Laparoscopic Simulation Training Research Articles

476 Enhancing Surgical Education: Assessing the Impact of Laparoscopic Simulators in Learning Surgical Anatomy and Improving Surgical Skills

Abstract Aim We assessed laparoscopic simulators' efficacy in teaching surgical anatomy and enhancing surgical skills, offering insights into their role in shaping surgical education. Method 83 medical students and foundation year doctors were surveyed before and after a hands-on laparoscopic simulator session. Using a 5-point Likert scale, perceptions of the simulator's effectiveness in teaching surgical anatomy and the importance of laparoscopic simulator training for improving surgical skills were gauged. Attendees also rated the simulators’ effectiveness in providing information and exposure to Laparoscopic surgery. Scores underwent normality assessment via the Shapiro–Wilk test; a one-tailed T-test gauged statistical significance. Qualitative data was collected for deeper insights. Results Attendees exhibited a significant increase in belief in laparoscopic simulators as an effective means to learn surgical anatomy (mean before = 4.26, after = 4.49, p = 2.41 x 10-3). Agreement increased for the necessity of laparoscopic simulator training in medical education for improving surgical skills (mean pre-event = 4.36, after = 4.55, p = 3.31 x 10-3). Conclusions A notable surge in support for integrating laparoscopic simulators in medical education emerged, indicating a promising avenue for enhancing anatomical understanding in minimally invasive contexts. The positive shift underscores the increasing recognition of laparoscopic simulators as valuable tools for teaching surgical anatomy and skills. Future research should explore the impact of laparoscopic simulation training on long-term outcomes.

895 Innovating Automated Progress Tracking System (APS) for Laparoscopic Simulation Training in Low-Middle-Income-Countries Using LaApSi Models: Low-Cost High-Fidelity Performance Assessment System with Microcontroller Connectivity

Abstract Aim To develop a Low-Cost Automated Progress tracking system (APS) embedded in the silicon based Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Simulation (LaApSi) Model which enables real-time assessment of Laparoscopic Appendicectomy (LA). To assess its application and validity in the low-resource setting via Laparoscopic Surgery courses. Method APS architecture includes thin insulated wires embedded in the LaApSi Models at the mesoappendix, appendicular artery, and the base of the appendix which acts as an indicator when cut during the appendicectomy. These wires are further connected to the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) located at the base of the model which connects with the microcontroller and establishes communication with the computer giving real-time data. Results The prototyped APS model was able to establish key features: 1. Total duration of the procedure 2. Identify potential surgical hazard: blood vessel injury 3. Length at which the appendicectomy is performed 4. Injury to surrounding structures. These performance data were recorded in the database for further review, analysis, and comparison for progression in the simulation training. The system is set up on a points basis hence when a user makes a surgical error e.g., blood vessel injury during the surgical simulation in the APS LaApSi Model, -20 points (Blood Vessels Cut) appear on the computer screen (images available). Further assessment and validity of the APS models are planned to be carried out in low-resource settings in the next 8 weeks. Conclusions The availability of a model blueprint of this cost-effective APS system (<20£) to LMICs will address the key barrier of surgical simulation in low-resource settings.

COVID Recovery Laparoscopic Simulation Program for Gynecological Registrars—Trainee Perceptions of Regional Model

Study ObjectiveThe acquisition of gynecological operating skills can be challenging for trainees given the conflicting demands of clinical work. Alternative models of surgical skill training such as laparoscopic simulation is, therefore, required. This study demonstrates the development of a regional gynecological surgery laparoscopic simulation program and trainee perceptions of such an approach. DesignAn intervention-based cohort study. SettingA regional model based in West Midlands training region. Patients/ParticipantsResponses from 64 trainees in the training region who participated in this regional program were included. InterventionsA 3-stream curriculum was developed to deliver key training outcomes as required by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) core curriculum as a component of a COVID Recovery Program. Courses were held in 7 teaching hospitals. Courses consisted of both theory and practical teaching. MeasurementsA structured feedback tool was used to collect trainee perceptions of the program. Trainee satisfaction was measured on the Likert scale of 1 to 3. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted with rank-order analysis of coded free-text responses. Main ResultsOverall, the majority of trainees 92% (n = 58/64) were very satisfied with the course. Rank-order analysis demonstrated hands-on-practice to be the key perceived benefit of laparoscopic simulation among basic and intermediate trainees, while feedback on procedural skills was felt most useful among advanced trainees. ConclusionA regional approach to laparoscopic simulation training is both achievable and acceptable. Trainee perceptions of usefulness are altered by seniority and experience. This should be accounted for in the development of laparoscopic simulation programs.

Variable practice is superior to self-directed training for laparoscopic simulator training: a randomized trial

BackgroundMastering laparoscopy is challenging—it requires specific psychomotor skills which are difficult to obtain in the operating room without potentially compromising patient safety. Proficiency-based training programs using virtual reality simulators allow novices to practice and develop their skills in a patient-safe learning environment. Variable practice leads to stronger retention and skills transfer in a non-surgical setting. The objective of this trial was to investigate if variable practice was superior to self-directed training.MethodsA randomized trial where participants (n = 36) were randomized to proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training of basic skills using either variable practice or self-directed training, followed by a transfer test with proficiency-based training on a procedural task (a salpingectomy). All participants returned after a period of 3–5 weeks to perform a retention test. Results: The mean time to proficiency for the basic skills tasks were 119 min (SD: 93) for the variable practice group versus 182 min (SD: 46) for the self-directed training group (p = 0.015). The time to reach proficiency during the transfer test was 103 min (SD: 57) versus 183 min (SD: 64) for the variable practice group versus the self-directed training group, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean time to proficiency for the retention test was 51 min (SD: 26) and 109 min (SD: 53) for the variable practice group and self-directed training group, respectively (p < 0.001).ConclusionVariable practice is superior to self-directed training for proficiency-based laparoscopic training. With variable time to practice proficiency is reduced, there is higher transfer to a procedural task, and retention is improved.

Effect of virtual reality training to enhance laparoscopic assistance skills

BackgroundWhile laparoscopic assistance is often entrusted to less experienced individuals, such as residents, medical students, and operating room nurses, it is important to note that they typically receive little to no formal laparoscopic training. This deficiency can lead to poor visibility during minimally invasive surgery, thus increasing the risk of errors. Moreover, operating room nurses and medical students are currently not included as key users in structured laparoscopic training programs.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate the laparoscopic skills of OR nurses, clinical medical postgraduate students, and residents before and after undergoing virtual reality training. Additionally, it aimed to compare the differences in the laparoscopic skills among different groups (OR nurses/Students/Residents) both before and after virtual reality training.MethodsOperating room nurses, clinical medical postgraduate students and residents from a tertiary Grade A hospital in China in March 2022 were selected as participants. All participants were required to complete a laparoscopic simulation training course in 6 consecutive weeks. One task from each of the four training modules was selected as an evaluation indicator. A before-and-after self-control study was used to compare the basic laparoscopic skills of participants, and laparoscopic skill competency was compared between the groups of operating room nurses, clinical medical postgraduate students, and residents.ResultsTwenty-seven operating room nurses, 31 clinical medical postgraduate students, and 16 residents were included. The training course scores for the navigation training module, task training module, coordination training module, and surgical skills training module between different groups (operating room nurses/clinical medical postgraduate/residents) before laparoscopic simulation training was statistically significant (p < 0.05). After laparoscopic simulation training, there was no statistically significant difference in the training course scores between the different groups. The surgical level scores before and after the training course were compared between the operating room nurses, clinical medical postgraduate students, and residents and showed significant increases (p < 0.05).ConclusionOur findings show a significant improvement in laparoscopic skills following virtual surgery simulation training across all participant groups. The integration of virtual surgery simulation technology in surgical training holds promise for bridging the gap in laparoscopic skill development among health care professionals.

Tele-mentoring - a way to expand laparoscopic simulator training for medical students over large distances: a prospective randomized pilot study

BackgroundStudies have shown the clinical benefits of laparoscopic simulator training. Decreasing numbers of operations by surgical residents have further increased the need for surgical simulator training. However, many surgical simulators in Sweden are often insufficiently used or not used at all. Furthermore, large geographical distances make access to curriculum-based surgical simulator training at established simulator centres difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether tele-mentoring (TM) could be well tolerated and improve basic laparoscopic surgical skills of medical students 900 km away from the teacher.MethodsTwenty students completed an informed consent and a pre-experimental questionnaire. The students were randomized into two groups: (1) TM (N = 10), receiving instructor feedback via video-link and (2) control group (CG, N = 10) with lone practice. Initial warm-up occurred in the Simball Box simulator with one Rope Race task followed by five consecutive Rope Race and three Peg Picker tasks. Afterwards, all students completed a second questionnaire.ResultsThe whole group enjoyed the simulator training (prescore 73.3% versus postscore 89.2%, P < 0.0001). With TM, the simulator Rope Race overall score increased (prescore 30.8% versus postscore 43.4%; P = 0.004), and the distance that the laparoscopic instruments moved decreased by 40% (P = 0.015), indicating better precision, whereas in the CG it did not. In Peg Picker, the overall scores increased, whereas total time and distance of the instruments decreased in both groups, indicating better performance and precision.ConclusionsSimulation training was highly appreciated overall. The TM group showed better overall performance with increased precision in what we believe to be the visuospatially more demanding Rope Race tasks compared to the CG. We suggest that surgical simulator tele-mentoring over long distances could be a viable way to both motivate and increase laparoscopic basic skills training in the future.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty proficiency during a residency program after adoption of a standardized simulation training program is maintained during the COVID pandemic despite reduced surgery volume.

To evaluate the effect of the standardized laparoscopic simulation training program in pyeloplasty, following its implementation and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective chart review was performed at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, a tertiary referral center in south Brazil, in which 151 patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed by residents between 2006-2021. They were divided into three groups: before and after adoption of a standardized laparoscopic simulation training program and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main outcome was a combined negative outcome of conversion to open surgery, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III or higher) or unsuccessful procedure, defined as need for redo pyeloplasty. There was a significant reduction in the combined negative outcome (21.1% vs 6.3%), surgical time (mean 200.0 min vs 177.4 min) and length of stay (median 5 days vs 3 days) after the adoption of simulation training program. These results were maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic (combined negative outcome of 6.3%, mean surgical time of 160.1 min and median length of stay of 3 days) despite a reduction in 55.4% of the surgical volume. A structured laparoscopic simulation program can improve outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty during the learning curve.

Role of video self-assessment in laparoscopic simulation training: a randomized pilot trial

Residency programs have implemented simulation training to compensate for reduced operating room exposure. Video recording is an educational tool that can be utilized for coaching, telepresence, and self-assessment during simulation training. Data is limited on the utility of video recording and self-assessment for laparoscopic training in Ob/Gyn residency programs.. This study aimed to determine the role of video self-assessment as an educational tool in laparoscopic simulation training and to establish the feasibility of our study design for a larger randomized controlled trial. This was a prospective pilot study with a parallel, randomized, trial design that occurred in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Mount Sinai Hospital. Subject participation took place in a surgical simulation training room. A total of 23 subjects were recruited (7 medical students, 15 residents, 1 fellow) voluntarily. All participants completed the study. All the subjects completed a pretest survey. The surgical simulation room contained a single Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery box trainer and video-recording station. For session #1, each participant performed 2 Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery tasks (A, peg transfer; B, intracorporeal knot tie). Participants were video recorded during session #1 and were randomized to either receive or not receive their video recording. The video group (n=13) and control group (n=10) repeated the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery tasks 7 to 10 days later (session #2). The primary outcome was percentage change in completion time between sessions. Secondary outcomes were percentage change in peg and needle drops between sessions. The participant characteristics (video vs control) were as follows: average training level (6.15 vs 4.90 years), self-assessment (1=poor, 10=excellent) of surgical skill (4.8 vs 3.7), and laparoscopic skill (4.4 vs 3.5). Training level was inversely correlated with completion time for tasks A and B (r, -0.79 and -0.87; P<.0001). Less experienced trainees required the maximum time allotted for each task in session #1 (A, 3; B, 13). Regarding the primary outcome, the video group improved less than the control group (A, 16.7% vs 28.3%; B, 14.4% vs 17.3%). After controlling for training level (residents only), the video group improved more in the primary outcome (A, 17% vs 7.4%; B, 20.9% vs 16.5%) and secondary outcomes (A, 0.0% vs -194.1%; B, 41.3% vs 37.6%). Video self-assessment has a potential role in simulation training for obstetrics-gynecology residents. With key improvements, the feasibility of our study design was demonstrated in preparation for a future definitive trial.

Five-Year Experience Training Surgeons with a Laparoscopic Simulation Training Program for Bariatric Surgery: a Quasi-experimental Design.

Nearly 200,000 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are performed yearly. Reported learning curves range between 50 and 150, even 500 cases to decrease the operative risk. Simulation programs could accelerate this learning curve safely; however, trainings for LRYGB are scarce. This study aims to describe and share our 5-year experience of a simulated program designed to achieve proficiency in LRYGB technical skills. A quasi-experimental design was used. All recruited participants were previously trained with basic and advanced laparoscopic simulation curriculum completing over 50h of practical training. Ex vivo animal models were used to practice manual and stapled gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and stapled jejunojejunostomy (JJO) in 10, 3, and 4 sessions, respectively. The main outcome was to assess the manual GJ skill acquisition. Pre- and post-training assessments using a Global Rating Scale (GRS; max 25 pts), Specific Rating Scale (SRS; max 20 pts), performance time, permeability, and leakage rates were analyzed. For the stapled GJ and JJO, execution time was registered. Data analysis was performed using parametric tests. In 5years, 68 trainees completed the program. For the manual GJ's pre- vs post-training assessment, GRS and SRS scores increased significantly (from 17 to 24 and from 13 to 19 points respectively, p-value < 0.001). Permeability rate increased while leakage rate and procedural time decreased significantly. This simulated training program showed effectiveness in improving laparoscopic skills for manual GJ and JJO in a simulated scenario. This new training program could optimize the clinical learning curve. Further studies are needed to assess the transfer of skills to the operating room.

Preparing Future Surgeons: An Evaluation of Academic Surgeons' Views on Laparoscopic Simulation Training for Medical Students.

Introduction With the development of laparoscopic simulation, medical students are motivated to expand their knowledge and proficiency in basic surgical skills. This study aims to demonstrate their capability and readiness for surgical clerkships and, ultimately, surgical residency. This study's primary objective is to ascertain academic surgeons' perspectives regarding laparoscopic simulation in undergraduate medical education and to determine if early exposure may afford medical students additional opportunities during their surgical clerkships. Methods A survey was created to ascertain surgeon perspectives on medical students' early exposure to laparoscopic simulation. Five-point Likert scales were used to indicate surgeon perspectives. The survey was conducted over the two days of the meeting; all attendees' meeting inclusion criteria were encouraged to participate. Surgeons practicing within the state of Alabama, with prior experience overseeing the development and training of medical students before June 1, 2022, and attending the AL Chapter American College of Surgeons 2022 Annual Meeting were eligible to complete the survey. Only completed surveys were included for analysis. Statement 1: "Pre-clinical exposure to laparoscopic simulators is beneficial to the training and development of medical students pursuing a surgical career." Statement 2: "I am more likely to allow medical students to participate in laparoscopic surgery cases if they have had prior exposure to, and training with, laparoscopic simulators." Results An on-site survey was conducted among 18 surgeons consisting of 14 full-time faculty attendings, two post-graduate year-five residents, and two post-graduate year-three residents, all practicing in academic medicine with experience overseeing the training of medical students.In response to Statement 1, 33.3% of respondents strongly agree and 66.6% agree. In response to Statement 2, 61.1% of respondents strongly agree, 33.3% agree, and 5.6% were undecided. Discussion Our study provides evidence to support the inclusion of laparoscopic simulation training in undergraduate medical education to enhance medical students' basic surgical skills and improve their clinical experience. Further research could inform the development of effective laparoscopic simulation training programs that prepare medical students transitioning to surgical residency.

Application of a highly simulated and adaptable training system in the laparoscopic training course for surgical residents: Experience from a high-volume teaching hospital in China

ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness, feasibility, and training effect of a highly simulated and adaptable laparoscopic training system in the advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course for surgical residents. MethodsThis study prospectively took the surgical residents who received the advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 as the research objects. In the stage one course, the trainees are randomly distributed into the dry simulation system group and Darwin laparoscopic training system group. The subjective assessment results of the trainees from the two groups are collected by questionnaires, and the simulation assessment results of the two groups are evaluated in a unified, objective, and standardized assessment form. The pre-course and post-course questionnaires were used to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the Darwin system in the stage two course. ResultsA total of 62 trainees completed the stage one and stage two courses. In the stage one course, the trainees were randomly distributed into the dry simulation trainer group (N = 19) and the Darwin group (N = 43). The results of the subjective assessment questionnaire showed that compared with the dry simulator group, the students in the Darwin group had higher subjective scores (P < 0.05). The objective assessment results for the 3 modules of "One Track Transfer", "One Tunnel Pass" and "High and Low Pillars" in the Darwin group were significantly better than those in the dry simulator group (P < 0.05). The trainees who received the stage two course completed the questionnaires before and after the course. The results showed that compared with pre-course evaluation, "basic theoretical knowledge of laparoscopy", "basic skills of laparoscopy", "laparoscopic suture technique" and "camera-holding technique" were significantly improved after training (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe highly simulated and adaptable laparoscopic training system is effective and feasible in the advanced integrated two-stage laparoscopic simulation training course for surgical residents.

Origami Box Folding Exercise: A laparoscopic box simulation training and assessment method in facilitating laparoscopic psychomotor skills with minimal preparation

ObjectiveLaparoscopic box simulation training is widely recognized as an assessment tool to facilitate psychomotor skills especially for novice surgeons. However, current commercialized training modules including pegs, gauze, clips, pins etc. are generally costly and relatively inaccessible. We introduce a simple and pioneer surgical training drill, the Origami Box Folding Exercise (OBFE), based on the validated evaluating system of objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) constructed with the scoring system of procedure-specific checklist (PSC) and global rating scale (GRS). Materials and methodsFace and content validation of the OBFE and OSATS are evaluated by five endoscopic experts from two medical centers in Taiwan. This is a prospective observational study analyzing the pre-test/post-test result of OBFE from 37 participants in two individual workshops as training and evaluating method for laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Both the pre and post tests are video recorded with a time limit of 5 min graded by two independent evaluators based on the OSATS scoring system. ResultsThe reliability of PSC, GRS, and intergroup value between PSC and GRS were 0.923, 0.926 and 0.933, respectively. Inter-rater reliability of PSC, GRS, and both were 0.985, 0.932 and 0.977, respectively. Construct validity of PSC and GRS were statistically significant, with p-value 0.006 and 0.001, respectively. ConclusionOBFE enhances laparoscopic psychomotor skills with requirement of a single piece of paper. The associated OSATS tool for a 5-min OBFE test was validated. OBFE training is an efficient training and assessment system to promote psychomotor skills in laparoscopic box simulation drill which requires simple and economical preparation.

Recommendations to develop a laparoscopic surgical simulation training program. Insights gained after 12 years of training surgeons

Introduction. The use of simulation in surgery has made it possible to shorten learning curves through deliberate practice. Although it has been incorporated long ago, there are still no clear recommendations to standardize its development and implementation. This manuscript aims to share recommendations based on our experience of more than twelve years of employing and improving a methodology in laparoscopic surgical simulation. Topics for Reflection. To transfer surgical skills to a trainee, we base our methodology on a three-pillar framework: The hardware and infrastructure (tools to train with), the training program itself (what to do), and the feedback (how to improve). Implementing a cost-effective program is feasible: the hardware does not need to be high fidelity to transfer skills, but the program needs to be validated. These pillars have evolved over time by incorporating technology: the on-site guidance from experts has changed to a remote and asynchronous modality by video recording the trainee’s execution, and by enabling remote and asynchronous feedback. The feedback provider does not necessarily have to be an expert clinician in the subject, but a person previously trained to be a trainer. This allows for deliberate practice until mastery has been reached and learning curves are consolidated. Conclusions. Recommendations based on the experience of our center have been presented, explaining the framework of our strategy. Considering these suggestions, it is hoped that our simulation methodology can aid the development and implementation of effective simulation-based programs for other groups and institutions.

5G-Assisted Remote Guidance in Laparoscopic Simulation Training Based on 3D Printed Dry Lab Models.

This is a pilot study to assess the utility of applying 5G-assisted remote guidance in laparoscopic simulation training. A single trainee of a junior surgeon was recruited to complete three steps of tasks including basic task 1, basic task 2, and model task, and the performance was recorded and evaluated. The operator completed each task three times. Except for basic task 1, all tasks were remotely guided by a more experienced surgeon using 5G technology. Tasks completion time and a 30-point objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score were utilized to assess the results of simulation training. All remote guidance processes were successfully completed without significant network latency. Through basic task 1, the operator quickly became familiar with the trained laparoscopic instruments. For basic task 2, OSATS scores increased from 16 to 24 points, and completion time decreased from 1500 to 986 s after training under 5G-assisted remote guidance. For model tasks, OSATS scores increased from 15 to 26 points, and completion time decreased from 1734 to 1142 s. This is a novel mode of laparoscopic simulation training to increase the convenience of training. Perhaps in the near future, surgeons can simulate difficult operations at home or in the office, and accurately grasp the possible situations that may occur in actual operations in advance.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12262-022-03590-2.

Simulation-based skills training: a qualitative interview study exploring surgical trainees’ experience of stress

IntroductionStress can affect the ability to acquire technical skills. Simulation-based training (SBT) courses allow surgical trainees to train their technical skills away from stressful clinical environments. Trainees’ subjective experiences of stress during SBT courses on laparoscopic surgery remains understudied. Here, we explored the subjective stress experiences of surgical trainees during mandatory laparoscopic SBT courses. We aimed to obtain a broader understanding of which factors of the simulation training the trainees perceived as eliciting stress.MethodsA qualitative study with semistructured individual interviews was undertaken to explore trainees’ subjective experiences of stress. Twenty surgical trainees participated while attending courses at a national training center for advanced laparoscopic surgery. Questions explored trainees’ stress experiences during the SBT courses with a focus on perceived stressors related to laparoscopic simulation training on two box-trainers and one virtual reality simulator. Interview data were analyzed using inductive, qualitative content analysis methods to identify codes, categories, and themes.ResultsFindings indicated that trainees have a variety of stress experiences during laparoscopic SBT. Three main themes were identified to be related to stress experiences: simulation task requirements, psychomotor skill levels and internal pressures, with subcategories such as task difficulty and time requirements, unrealistic haptic feedback and realism of graphics, inconsistent and poor technical performance, and self-imposed pressures and socio-evaluative threats.ConclusionsInsights into surgical trainees’ experience of stress during laparoscopic SBT courses showed that some stress experiences were directly related to simulation training, while others were of psychological nature. The technical and efficiency requirements of simulation tasks elicited stress experiences among trainees with less laparoscopic experience and lower levels of psychomotor skills. Self-imposed pressures played an integral part in how trainees mobilized and performed during the courses, suggesting that levels of stress might enhance laparoscopic simulation performance. For course facilitators aiming at optimizing future laparoscopic SBT courses, attending to the realism, providing clarity about learning objectives, and having awareness of individual differences among trainees’ technical level when designing the simulation tasks, would be beneficial. Equally important to the laparoscopic SBT is to create a psychological safe learning space in order to reduce the internal pressures of trainees.

Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic simulation: a promising future for large-scale automated evaluations.

IntroductionA limitation to expanding laparoscopic simulation training programs is the scarcity of expert evaluators. In 2019, a new digital platform for remote and asynchronous laparoscopic simulation training was validated. Through this platform, 369 trainees have been trained in 14 institutions across Latin America, collecting 6729 videos of laparoscopic training exercises. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has recently emerged in surgical simulation, showing usefulness in training assessment, virtual reality scenarios, and laparoscopic virtual reality simulation. An AI algorithm to assess basic laparoscopic simulation training exercises was developed. This study aimed to analyze the agreement between this AI algorithm and expert evaluators in assessing basic laparoscopic-simulated training exercises.MethodsThe AI algorithm was trained using 400-bean drop (BD) and 480-peg transfer (PT) videos and tested using 64-BD and 43-PT randomly selected videos, not previously used to train the algorithm. The agreement between AI and expert evaluators from the digital platform (EE) was then analyzed. The exercises being assessed involve using laparoscopic graspers to move objects across an acrylic board without dropping any objects in a determined time (BD < 24 s, PT < 55 s). The AI algorithm can detect object movement, identify if objects have fallen, track grasper clamps location, and measure exercise time. Cohen’s Kappa test was used to evaluate the agreement between AI assessments and those performed by EE, using a pass/fail nomenclature based on the time to complete the exercise.ResultsAfter the algorithm was trained, 79.69% and 93.02% agreement were observed in BD and PT, respectively. The Kappa coefficients test observed for BD and PT were 0.59 (moderate agreement) and 0.86 (almost perfect agreement), respectively.ConclusionThis first approach of AI use in basic laparoscopic skills simulated training assessment shows promising results, providing a preliminary framework to expand the use of AI to other basic laparoscopic skills exercises.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09576-1.

Haptic simulators accelerate laparoscopic simulator training, but skills are not transferable to a non-haptic simulator: a randomized trial.

Laparoscopy requires specific psychomotor skills and can be challenging to learn. Most proficiency-based laparoscopic training programs have used non-haptic virtual reality simulators; however, haptic simulators can provide the tactile sensations that the surgeon would experience in the operating room. The objective was to investigate the effect of adding haptic simulators to a proficiency-based laparoscopy training program. A randomized controlled trial was designed where residents (n = 36) were randomized to proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training using haptic or non-haptic simulators. Subsequently, participants from the haptic group completed a follow-up test, where they had to reach proficiency again using the non-haptic simulator. Participants from the non-haptic group returned to train until reaching proficiency again using the non-haptic simulator. Mean completion times during the intervention were 120min (SD 38.7min) and 183min (SD 66.3min) for the haptic group and the non-haptic group, respectively (p = 0.001). The mean times to proficiency during the follow-up test were 107min (SD 41.0min) and 58min (SD 23.7min) for the haptic and the non-haptic group, respectively (p < 0.001). The haptic group was not faster to reach proficiency in the follow-up test than during the intervention (p = 0.22). In contrast, the non-haptic group reached the required proficiency level significantly faster in the follow-up test (p < 0.001). Haptic virtual reality simulators reduce the time to reach proficiency compared to non-haptic simulators. However, the acquired skills are not transferable to the conventional non-haptic setting.

Use of virtual platform for delivery of simulation-based laparoscopic training curriculum in LMICs.

Laparoscopic surgery is rapidly expanding in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet many surgeons in LMICs have limited formal training in laparoscopy. In 2017, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) implemented Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP), an in-person simulation-based laparoscopic training curriculum for surgeons in LMICs. In light of COVID-19, SAGES adapted GLAP to a virtual format with telesimulation. This study explores the feasibility and efficacy of virtual laparoscopic simulation training in resource-limited settings. Participants from San Jose, Costa Rica, Leon, México, and Guadalajara, México enrolled in the virtual GLAP curriculum, meeting biweekly for 2-h didactic classes and 2-h hands-on live simulation practice. Surgical residents' laparoscopic skills were evaluated using the five Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) tasks during the initial and final weeks of the program. Participants also completed pre-and post-program surveys assessing their perception of simulation-based training. The study cohort consisted of 16 surgical attendings and 20 general surgery residents. A minimum 70% response rate was recorded across all surveys in the study. By the end of GLAP, residents completed all five tasks of the FLS exam within less time relative to their performance at the beginning of the training program (p < 0.05). Respondents (100%) reported that the program was a good use of their time and that education via telesimulation was easily reproduced. Participants indicated that the practice sessions, guidance, and feedback offered by mentors were their favorite elements of the training. A virtual simulation-based curriculum can be an effective strategy for laparoscopic skills training. Participants demonstrated an improvement in laparoscopic skills, and they appreciated the mentorship and opportunity to practice laparoscopic skills. Future programs can expand on using a virtual platform as a low-cost, effective strategy for providing laparoscopic skills training to surgeons in LMICs.

Remote and asynchronous training network: from a SAGES grant to an eight-country remote laparoscopic simulation training program.

Limitations in surgical simulation training include lack of access to validated training programs with continuous year-round training and lack of experts' ongoing availability for feedback. A model of simulation training was developed to address these limitations. It incorporated basic and advanced laparoscopic skills curricula from a previously validated program and provided instruction through a digital platform. The platform allowed for remote and asynchronous feedback from a few trained instructors. The instructors were continuously available and provided personalized feedback using a variety of different media. We describe the upscaling of this model to teach trainees at fourteen centers in eight countries. Institutions with surgical programs lacking robust simulation curricula and needing instructors for ongoing education were identified. The simulation centers ("skills labs") at these sites were equipped with necessary simulation training hardware. A remote training-the-administrators (TTA) program was developed where personnel were trained in how to manage the skills lab, schedule trainees, set up training stations, and use the platform. A train-the-trainers (TTT) program was created to establish a network of trained instructors, who provided objective feedback through the platform remotely and asynchronously. Between 2019 and 2022, seven institutions in Chile and one in each of the USA, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, El Salvador, México, and Perú implemented a digital platform-based remote simulation curriculum. Most administrators were not physicians (19/33). Eight Instructors were trained with the TTT program and became active proctors. The platform has been used by 369 learners, of whom 57% were general surgeons and general surgery residents. A total of 6729 videos, 28,711 feedback inputs, and 233.7 and 510.2 training hours in the basic and advanced programs, respectively, were registered. A remote and asynchronous method of giving instruction and feedback through a digital platform has been effectively employed in the creation of a robust network of continuous year-round simulation-based training in laparoscopy. Training centers were successfully run only with trained administrators to assist in logistics and setup, and no on-site instructors were necessary.

The Successful Implementation of a Laparoscopic Simulation Training Program in the Dominican Republic

IntroductionMount Sinai Hospital in New York introduced a laparoscopic surgery simulation center to a public hospital in Santiago, Dominican Republic to determine the feasibility of training programs in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). MethodsIn August 2018, recruitment and preliminary data were collected at the Hospital Jose Maria Cabral y Báez in Santiago, Dominican Republic. The simulation room consists of three simulation stations. Residents were required to practice 1 h/wk guided by a general surgery postgraduate year 3 (PGY3) Mount Sinai resident. Number of hours practiced was self-reported and follow-up data was collected in June 2019. The study endpoints include times on three simulated laparoscopic tasks including peg-transfer, precision cutting, and intracorporeal knot tying. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were used for statistical analysis. ResultsThe partnership between hospitals allowed for successful integration into the Dominican general surgery training. Over 10 mo, residents averaged 25 h of practice (range: 8-35 h; SD 9.95 h). In total, 85% of the residents participated in the study (5 postgraduate year 1 [PGY1], 2 postgraduate year 2 [PGY2], and 4 postgraduate year 3 [PGY3]). Resident median simulation times significantly improved for precision cutting (3:49 min versus 2:09 min, P = 0.002) and intracorporeal knot tying (5:20 min versus 2:47 min, P = 0.037). There was neither significant difference in peg-transfer times nor performance between resident years (P = 0.12). ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the successful integration of a laparoscopic simulation program into an LMIC surgical resident training program. With commitment from local institutions and external resources, establishing laparoscopic simulation centers are feasible and expandable, thereby allowing general surgery residents in other LMICs, the opportunity to improve their laparoscopic skills.