Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Research Articles

A study of comparison of perioperative complications in intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique vs extended view totally extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair

Background: Abdominal hernia occurs through the layers of the abdominal wall at a weak point. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is an established treatment for ventral hernias. This study was conducted in patients who underwent e-TEP and IPOM surgery for ventral hernia to characterize postoperative pain, recovery time, and quality of life. Predefined preoperative and peri-operative factors were examined for their potential impact. Methods: A prospective study on a total of 50 patients who underwent IPOM and e-TEP for ventral hernia was conducted, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomized by simple random sampling technique and were divided into two groups of 25 each (Group A- e-TEP and Group B- IPOM). Data of both groups were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Chi square test and Student ‘t’ test. Results: The eTEP approach provides benefits compared to IPOM in terms of reduced hospital stay, earlier return to work and cost effective. However, eTEP is linked to complex learning process and in the end the decision of the surgery type should be made on the basis of specific patient’s conditions, surgeon’s expertise and availability of resources Conclusions: In study we found that both surgeries were comparable, with each having some benefits over the other.

Long-term patient reported outcomes after robotic, laparoscopic, and open ventral hernia repair.

Current evidence demonstrates questionable incremental benefit of robotic abdominal wall (ventral) hernia repair when compared to other approaches. However, data are mainly limited to 30-day outcomes and do not capture long-term patient reported outcomes (PROs) where the robotic may provide distinct advantages. We analyzed patients who underwent ventral hernia repair from January 2020-September 30, 2022 in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR). Validated PROs included the Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory (VHRI), PROMIS Pain Intensity 3a (Pain 3a), and HerQLes quality of life measures. Survey weighting was employed to reduce non-response bias and balance respondents with the overall COHR population. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of operative approach with answering "Yes" to the 3 VHRI questions, reporting a worse than average Pain 3a score, and reporting a below median HerQLes score. Models accounted for patient, hernia, and operative characteristics. Our sample included 1583 patients undergoing hernia repair, of which 507 (32.0%) were robotic, 202 (12.8%) were laparoscopic, and 874 (55.2%) were open. Median follow up time was 1.3years (IQR 1.2-1.5). Patient characteristics were similar across approaches. Robotic repairs were more often performed electively, on larger hernias, and with mesh. After controlling for covariates, a robotic approach was associated with a lower predicted probability of reporting a bulge [19.5% (95% CI 15.7-23.2%)] than a laparoscopic approach [26.8% (95% CI 20.4-33.2%)], but was no different than an open approach [18.8% (95% CI 16.1-21.6%)]. No other differences in PROs were found by approach. We found a lower likelihood of reporting a bulge after robotic ventral hernia repair when compared with a laparoscopic approach, but no difference when compared with an open approach. No other differences in long-term PROs were found when comparing robotic to laparoscopic or open approaches.

Impact of 2023 Ventral Hernia Repair CPT Code Changes on Work Relative Value Units in a Tertiary Hernia Referral Center.

CPT codes for ventral hernia repair (VHR) changed in January 2023 to address the heterogeneity of procedures with a concomitant shift from a 90-day to a 0-day global period. This study reviews a tertiary referral center's experience with hernia coding comparing the work relative value units (wRVUs) generated for ventral hernia repair pre-2023 compared to post-2023. CPT codes were analyzed for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic VHR before updates to the CPT hernia codes (January 2022-September 2022) and following CPT change (January 2023-September 2023). Work RVU values were assigned based on nationally published values. CPT codes in 2022, CPT codes in 2023, 8 inpatient E&M codes, and 5 outpatient E&M codes were evaluated. 299 patients underwent VHR, 143 in 2022 and 156 in 2023. Average procedural VHR wRVUs increased from 9.6 in 2022 to 11.6 in 2023 (p<0.001). Procedures involving myofascial advancement flaps/component separation techniques (53.8% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.419) and wRVUs for the component separation procedures were similar between 2022 and 2023, respectively 17.7 vs 16.1 (p=0.419)]. The wRVUs associated with adjunctive procedures (mesh removal/placement) decreased from 3.3 to 0.6 (p<0.001) in the post-2023 era. Postoperative E&M wRVUs increased in 2023 for postoperative inpatient (0.48) and postoperative outpatient (0.39) services, compared to 0 wRVUs in 2022. Overall, the total management including follow-up clinic visit adjusted wRVUs for hernia repair was similar between 2022 and 2023, respectively 30.7 vs 29.2 (p=0.409). Procedural wRVUs for anterior abdominal hernia repair increased from 2022 to 2023 (p<0.001) at a tertiary referral medical center. However, total wRVUs, including the operation and postoperative visits, remained unchanged.

SP1.2 - Laparoscopic versus Robotic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the perioperative outcomes randomised controlled trials

Abstract Objective The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the perioperative surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of robotic incisional/ventral hernia repair (RIVHR) versus laparoscopic incisional/ventral hernia repair (LIVHR). Methods Randomised control trials (RCTs) reporting perioperative outcomes and costs in patients undergoing RIVHR versus LIVHR were selected from medical electronic databases and meta-analysis was conducted under the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using statistical software RevMan version 5. Results Four RCTs on 337 patients reporting perioperative outcomes and cost comparison were included. In the random effect model analysis, the duration of operation [standardized mean difference (SMD) -48.07, 95%, CI (-78.06, -18.07), z = 3.14, p = 0.002] was shorter and cost was lower [SMD 0.82, 95%, CI (-1.48, -0.16), z = 2.45, p = 0.01] in the LIVHR group but with significant statistical heterogeneity. However, the variables of hernia recurrence [risk ratio (RR) 2.29, 95%, CI (0.73, 7.12), z = 1.43, p = 0.15] and surgical site complications [RR 0.85, 95%, CI (0.48, 1.50), z = 0.55, p = 0.58] were statistically similar in both groups without any statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. Conclusion The RIVHR does not offer any superiority over LIVHR in all perioperative variables and it is not cost effective. Due to the paucity of the RCTs, a major multi-centre RCT is needed to validate these findings.

Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair (IPOM) versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair with Closure of Fascia Defect (IPOM Plus) for Ventral Hernias: Retrospective Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes

Background: Intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair, a type of Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair (LVHR), comprises bridging the defect from the peritoneal side with a composite mesh. Recently, IPOMPlus has become the recommended type of LVHR in which the defect in the fascia is sutured before placing the mesh. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study conducted at Dharan Hospital, Salem. Patients who had undergone IPOM-Plus or IPOM during January 2020 to June 2021 were selected. Data regarding demographics, intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were collected from medical record section. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 taking a p-value of &lt;0.05 as statistically significant. Results: A total of 74 patients were included in this study, out of which 34 patients had undergone IPOM (Group A) and 40 patients underwent IPOM-Plus (Group B). In both the groups, there was no statistical difference in demographic variables except more number of umbilical hernia in both the groups compared to epigastric and paraumbilical hernia. Hernia defect size and mean operative time were varied significantly (p-value &lt; 0.05) in both groups. More number of seroma formation (p=0.021), pseudosac at first OPD visit (p=0.020) and pseudosac at 6 months (p=0.027) in Group A compared to Group B. Conclusions: IPOM plus repair is safe with possible advantages over a standard IPOM repair in patients with ventral hernia in term of postoperative outcomes. Keywords: Ventral hernia, IPOM, IPOM Plus, Laparoscopy

The impact of overweight and obesity on the results of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, including robot-assisted repair - a literature review

Obesity is the fifth leading cause of death worldwide. In turn, ventral hernias (including an inguinal hernias) are one of the most common cases in general surgery. Minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic or robot-assisted procedures) are becoming more and more popular in ventral hernia treatment compared to open procedures. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of body mass index (BMI) value on the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs, including inguinal hernia repairs. Numerous studies evaluating this relationship are available. In most studies, There were also no statistically significant differences in the rate of intraoperative complications, the median operative time, the median length of hospital stay, the rate of postoperative pain, the surgical site infection, the rate of postoperative complications, the median time to recurrence, and the rate of early and late recurrences between groups with different BMI values. Moreover, studies proved that laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in obese patients is more effective compared to the open repair. The analysis revealed that high BMI values do not have a statistically significant impact on the outcomes of laparoscopic repair, including robot-assisted laparoscopic repair, in patients with ventral hernias. However, it should be noted that the analyzed studies often have limitations. For this reason, it is essential to conduct multicenter studies and perform long-term evaluations of patients.

Laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair (LaHRR): a case-series of 17 patients treated with a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia and diastasis repair.

Many minimally invasive techniques have been developed over the years to treat primary ventral hernias and rectus abdominis diastasis, all of which have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of complications, reproducibility, and cost. We present a case-series of a novel approach that was safe and reproducible in a cohort of 17 patients. All patients in the study underwent the novel procedure between October 2022 and July 2023. We collected data retrospectively, including patient general characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications. Patient follow-up lasted 12months to exclude recurrences. Seventeen patients underwent the procedure for primary uncomplicated ventral hernias and rectus diastasis. The median length of hospital stay was 2days (IQR 2-3). In 4 out of 17 cases minor complications occurred within 30days, of which 3 were class I and 1 was a class II complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. There were no recurrences. Although limited by a small cohort of patients and a non-comparative study design, our study presents encouraging results in regards to the safety of this technique. More studies with a larger study population are needed to evaluate the benefits and pitfalls of this new technique.[query names].

Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic IPOM is technically challenging, especially regarding fascial closure. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a simpler approach. We aimed to compare hybrid and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases to identify studies comparing hybrid versus laparoscopic IPOM VHR reporting the outcomes of recurrence, mortality, seroma, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.1.2 using a random-effects model. We screened 2,896 articles and fully reviewed 22 of them. A total of five studies, encompassing 664 patients were included. Among them, 337 (50.8%) underwent laparoscopic IPOM. All patients had incisional hernias, with a mean diameter varying from 3 to 12.7cm, 60% were women, with a mean BMI varying from 29.5 to 38. The hybrid approach had a lower rate of seroma when compared to the laparoscopic (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.92; p = 0.038; I²=78%). We found no difference in recurrence, mortality, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time between groups. Hybrid IPOM is a safe and effective method for incisional hernia repair. Moreover, it facilitates fascial defect closure and decreases postoperative seromas.

Hybrid Technique for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: Description and Early Results.

Objective Ventral hernia repair is a widely practiced surgical procedure worldwide. The objective of this paper is to evaluate and analyze the results of a hybrid approach for treating ventral hernias. Methods All patients with clinically and radiologically proven ventral hernia underwent hybrid laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at Princess Royal University Hospital, London, United Kingdom using a retrospective approach with the same surgical team. Large defects >10 cm, inguinal hernia, para-stomal hernia, incarcerated patients, and spigelian hernia were excluded. We utilized the laparoscopic approach for the dissection and isolation of the sac and used the port site for the delivery of mesh into the abdominal cavity. Results Our study comprises 67 patients, with 39 males (58.2%) and 28 females (41.8%). The median age in our study group was 41 years (range: 18-65 years). The median BMI was 38 kg/m2 (range: 24-52 kg/m2). The majority of the cases were umbilical or paraumbilical hernias (n = 46). The median defect size in our study was 5.4 cm (range: 2-10 cm). The median operative time was 67 minutes. We have not encountered any recurrences in this group. Conclusion This hybrid approach combines the advantages of both the open and laparoscopic approaches.

Evaluation of the Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized placebo controlled trial

BackgroundThe Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) reduces postoperative pain after several types of abdominal laparoscopic surgeries. There is sparse data on the effect of ESPB in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to test the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ESPB for this procedure.MethodsIn this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study, adult patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were randomly assigned to either bilateral preoperative ESPB with catheters at the level of Th7 (2 × 30 ml of either 2.5 mg/ml ropivacaine or saline), with postoperative catheter top ups every 6 h for 24 h. The primary outcome was rescue opioid consumption during the first hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption at 4 h and 24 h, pain scores, nausea, sedation, as well as Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) during the first week.ResultsIn total, 64 patients were included in the primary outcome measure. There was no significant difference in rescue opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents (OME)) at one hour postoperatively, with the ESPB group 26.9 ± 17.1 mg versus 32.4 ± 24.3 mg (mean ± SD) in the placebo group (p= 0.27). There were no significant differences concerning the secondary outcomes during the seven-day observation period. Seven patients received a rescue block postoperatively, providing analgesia in five patients.ConclusionWe found no difference in measured outcomes between ESPB and placebo in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Future studies may evaluate whether a block performed using higher concentration and/or at a different thoracic level provides more analgesic efficacy.Trial registrationNCT04438369; 18/06/2020.

The Utilization of Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair (LVHR) in Incarcerated and Strangulated Cases: A National Trend in Outcomes.

Early after its adoption, minimally invasive surgery had limited usefulness in emergent cases. However, with improvements in equipment, techniques, and skills, laparoscopy in complex and emergency operations expanded substantially. This study aimed to examine the trend of laparoscopy in incarcerated or strangulated ventral hernia repair (VHR) over time. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for laparoscopic repair of incarcerated and strangulated hernias (LIS-VHR) and compared over 2 time periods, 2014-2016 and 2017-2019. The utilization of laparoscopy in all incarcerated or strangulated VHR increased over time (2014-2016: 39.9% (n = 14 075) vs 2017-2019: 46.3% (n = 18 369), P < .001). Though likely not clinically significant, demographics and comorbidities statistically differed between groups (female: 51.7% vs 50.0%, P = .003; age 54.5 ± 13.7 vs 55.4 ± 13.8years, P < .001; BMI 34.9 ± 8.0 vs 34.6 ± 7.8kg/m2, P < .001). Patients from 2017 to 2019 were less comorbid (18.9% vs 16.8% smokers, P < .001; 18.2% vs 17.3% diabetic, P = .036; 4.6% vs 4.1% COPD, P = .021) but had higher ASA classification (III: 43.3% vs 45.7%; IV: 2.5% vs 2.7%, P < .001). Hernia types (primary, incisional, recurrent) were similar in each group. Operative time (89.7 ± 59.3 vs 97.4 ± 63.4min, P < .001) became longer but length-of-stay (1.4 ± 3.3 vs 1.1 ± 2.6days, P < .001) decreased. There was no statistical difference in surgical complications, medical complications, reoperation, or readmission rates between periods. Laparoscopic VHR has become a routine method for treating incarcerated and strangulated hernias, and its utilization continues to increase over time. Clinical outcomes have remained the same while hospital stays have decreased.

Comparison between intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with closure of fascial defect (IPOM plus) and intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for ventral hernias

Aim. To evaluate the intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with closure of fascial defect (IPOM plus) versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) for ventral hernias (VHs). Materials and methods. A total of 89 patients with VHs with a defect between 3–12 cm who underwent a surgery from 2018 to 2023 years were enrolled in this study. All of them were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 included 45 patients after intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with closure of fascial defect (IPOM plus), Group 2 – 44 patients after intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). The distribution of patients by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hernia type (primary VH, incisional hernia), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was studied. Results. The differences in sex, mean age, patient distribution based on hernia type, BMI, ASA score and hernia orifice size were not statistically significant between the two groups. Therefore, both groups were comparable. The operative time in minutes was 73.17 ± 7.43 in Group 1 and 70.93 ± 8.84 in Group 2 (not statistically significant). The pain score 12 hours after surgery was 5.24 ± 0.60 in Group 1 comparing to 5.02 ± 0.45 in Group 2 (not statistically significant). The pain score 8 days after surgery was 2.88 ± 0.31 in Group 1 comparing to 2.75 ± 0.43 in Group 2 (not statistically significant). There was no significant difference concerning the incidence of early complications between the two groups. 41 (91.11 %) patients of Group 1 and 40 (90.9 %) patients of Group 2 were examined during a 22-month follow-up period. No complications were noted. Conclusions. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides satisfactory results in terms of safety and efficacy. Thus, IPOM plus repair is safe, feasible and offers possible advantages over the standard IPOM technique as reported in the literature. Poor outcomes described in the literature are probably related to independent variables such as mesh and suture types as well as closure technique.

Weight reduction among females undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: The role of Calcium and Vitamin D3.

To evaluate the role of Vitamin-D and calcium supplementation on preoperative weight reduction in obese women before laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. This double-blind clinical trial was conducted at the affiliated health centers of King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia from January 2021 to December 2021. It included forty-five obese women aged 24-56 years, with body mass index (BMI) of 34.0-48.0kg/m2. They were randomly allocated into two groups; the Group-A (N=22) included obese women who received supplementation of 5000IU cholecalciferol (Vitamin-D3), and 1000mg calcium daily for 12 months, while the Group-B (N=23) received no treatment. Measurement of change in weight and BMI and comparison of their pre-operative weight reduction, laparoscopic operative time, and length of hospital stay was done. There were no differences in patients' biographic data between the two groups. During the study, Vitamin-D level in the patients increased and there was a significant positive association with weight loss. In group-A, the mean weight loss was 11.8±3.5 kg. At the end of first year, their BMI decreased from 36.1±1.6kg/m2 at baseline to 29.7±2.6 kg/m2, whereas in-group-B, the mean weight loss was 6.8±3.1 kg and their BMI decreased from 36.9±2.69kg/m2 at baseline to 32.7±0.93kg/m2. The operation time and the length of hospital stay were shorter in group-A (107 vs.128.min) and (3 vs. 5 days) respectively as compared to Group-B. Vitamin-D and calcium supplementation contributes to a remarkable weight reduction of preoperative obese female patients, which in turn is associated with significantly better outcome of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia.

A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic IPOM plus.

Ventral hernia repairs, particularly laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), have become common procedures among general surgeons worldwide. Despite the benefits of LVHR, acute postoperative pain remains a significant concern. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have been employed to alleviate postoperative pain in various laparoscopic procedures. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic-guided TAP block in laparoscopic IPOM plus and its impact on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care center in India involving 72 patients undergoing laparoscopic IPOM plus. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group I received laparoscopic-guided TAP block, while Group II received standard general anesthesia without TAP block. Pain scores were assessed at 6, 12, and 24h postoperatively using the numerical rating scale. Postoperative analgesic requirements were also recorded. Group I demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 6 and 24h postoperatively compared to Group II. The need for additional analgesics was significantly lower in Group I (13.8%) compared to Group II (72.2%). There were no significant differences in age, BMI, duration of surgery, or other demographic characteristics between the two groups. The findings of this randomized controlled trial demonstrate the effectiveness of laparoscopic-guided TAP blocks in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic requirements after laparoscopic IPOM plus.

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite advancements in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) using the intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (sIPOM), recurrence remains a common postoperative complication. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of defect closure (IPOM-plus) versus non-closure in ventral and incisional hernia repair. The aim is to determine which technique yields better outcomes in terms of reducing recurrence and complication rates. A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception until October 1, 2022, to identify all online English publications that compared the outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with and without fascia closure. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eleven cohort studies involving 1585 patients met the inclusion criteria. The IPOM-plus technique was found to reduce the recurrence of hernias (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.35, 0.76], p < 0.01), seroma (OR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.32, 0.71], p < 0.01), and mesh bulging (OR = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.42], p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.29, 0.65], p < 0.0001), type of article (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.35, 0.76], p = 0.0008 < 0.01), geographical location (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.36, 0.82], p = 0.004 < 0.01), follow-up time (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.34, 0.73], p = 0.0004 < 0.01) had a significant influence on the postoperative recurrence of the IPOM-plus technique. The IPOM-plus technique has been shown to greatly reduce the occurrence of recurrence, seroma, and mesh bulging. Overall, the IPOM-plus technique is considered a safe and effective procedure. However, additional randomized controlled studies with extended follow-up periods are necessary to further evaluate the IPOM-plus technique.

Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundVentral hernia repair underwent various developments in the previous decade. Laparoscopic primary ventral hernia repair may be an alternative to open repair since it prevents large abdominal incisions. However, whether laparoscopy improves clinical outcomes has not been systematically assessed.ObjectivesThe aim is to compare the clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic versus open approach of primary ventral hernias.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted in February 2023. All randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy with the open approach in patients with a primary ventral hernia were included. A fixed-effects meta-analysis of risk ratios was performed for hernia recurrence, local infection, wound dehiscence, and local seroma. Meta-analysis for weighted mean differences was performed for postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and time until return to work.ResultsNine studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall hernia recurrence was twice less likely to occur in laparoscopy (RR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.32–0.74; p < 0.001; I2 = 29%). Local infection (RR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.19–0.49; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), wound dehiscence (RR = 0.08; 95%CI = 0.02–0.32; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), and local seroma (RR = 0.34; 95%CI = 0.19–0.59; p < 0.001; I2 = 14%) were also significantly less likely in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Severe heterogeneity was obtained when pooling data on postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and time until return to work.ConclusionThe results of available studies are controversial and have a high risk of bias, small sample sizes, and no well-defined protocols. However, the laparoscopic approach seems associated with a lower frequency of hernia recurrence, local infection, wound dehiscence, and local seroma.

Comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic and open primary ventral hernia repair according to European registry for abdominal wall hernias quality of life score

Background Ventral hernia can be defined as noninguinal and nonhiatal hernia in the fascia of the abdominal wall. Laparoscopic repair become a popular method with decreased overall complications nowadays. We aimed to provide an efficient management for ventral hernia through comparison of quality of life (QoL) postlaparoscopic and open techniques according to European registry for abdominal wall hernias quality of life (EuraHS-QOL) score. Patients and methods The data of 54 patients with primary ventral hernia were collected prospectively. Of these patients, 27 underwent open repair, and 27 underwent laparoscopic repair after excluding patients with a complicated and recurrent ventral hernia and incisional hernia. Perioperative QoL was assessed according to the EuraHS score. Results Two groups were designed, each including 27 patients. The most common complication was seroma (25.9%) in open repair, followed by infection (18.5%), while only one case in laparoscopic repair had port site infection; the difference was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). The mean operative time in open repair was 51.2±5.1 and 89.7±9.5 in laparoscopic repair; the difference was highly significant (P&lt;0.001). The mean length of stay in the hospital was 23.1±7.3, and it was 19.1±6 in laparoscopic repair; the difference was significant (P&lt;0.05). All cases in open repair had subcutaneous drain; but not in laparoscopic repair; the difference was highly significant (P&lt;0.001). The EuraHS score in all its items was significant in favor of laparoscopic repair. Conclusion Laparoscopic repair was associated with high QoL, less complications, and recovery time as compared with open repair of ventral hernia.

Assessment of Mesh Fixation by Dual Use of Trans-Fascial Sutures and Tacks in The Outcome of Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair “Case-Series”

Assessment of Mesh Fixation by Dual Use of Trans-Fascial Sutures and Tacks in The Outcome of Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair “Case-Series”

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh with fascial repair (IPOM plus) for ventral and incisional hernia

Abdominal wall surgery for ventral hernia is one of the commonest procedures performed by the surgeons. The aim of the study is to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM plus approach. Materials and methods. This study describes 70 patients who underwent laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair plus (IPOM plus) for ventral and incisional hernia. These were then followed up for a period of a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 5 years. Results. Of the 70 patients, 8 (11.43 %) linea alba hernias, 28 (40.00 %) umbilical hernias, 34 (48.57 %) had incisional hernias. The distribution based on ASA score: I – 23 (32.86 %) patients, II – 39 (55.71 %), III – 8 (11.43 %). The mean age was 50.21 ± 0.89 years (M ± m). Male to female ratio was 1.19:1.00. Average defect size was 4.77 ± 0.21 cm (M ± m). Mean operating time was 58.27 ± 0.52 minutes (M ± m). Mean post-op hospital stay was 1.84 ± 0.06 days (M ± m). Intensity of pain by VAS pain score was 5.11 ± 0.92, 4.47 ± 0.31, 2.90 ± 0.72, 0.92 ± 0.81 (M ± m) after 6 hours, 24 hours, 1 week, 6 weeks respectively. No conversion to open laparotomy was required. Reported complications were port-site seroma 3 (4.29 %), port-site hematoma 1 (1.43 %) over one year of follow-up. 62 (88.57 %) patients were evaluated over 21 months follow-up period, no complications have been reported. Conclusions. Obtained results showed that the IPOM plus repair is safe and may be used for routine laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair, the closure of fascial defect appears to give chance for good fixation of the mesh and decrease postoperative morbidity.

Systematic review of robotic ventral hernia repair with meta-analysis.

Despite being one of the most common operations performed by general surgeons, there is a lack of consensus regarding the recommended approach for ventral hernia repair (VHR). Recent times have seen the rapid development of new techniques, such as robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the currently available evidence relating to RVHR, in comparison to open VHR (OVHR) and laparoscopic VHR (LVHR). A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. A meta-analysis was performed for the outcomes of length of stay (LOS), recurrence, operative time, intraoperative complications, wound complications, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, mortality and costs. A total of 39 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, RVHR reduced LOS, intra-operative complications, wound complications and readmission compared to OVHR. Compared to LVHR, RVHR was associated with increased operative time and costs, with comparable clinical outcomes. There is currently a lack of robust evidence to support the robotic approach in VHR. It does not demonstrate major benefits in comparison to LVHR, which is more affordable and accessible. Strong quality, long-term data is required to help with establishing a gold standard approach in VHR.