Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Group Research Articles

A Comparative Study of Postoperative Outcomes: Open Cholecystectomy versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background: Surgery is usually necessary to treat gallstones, or cholelithiasis. Because laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less intrusive than open cholecystectomy, it is now the treatment of choice. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the postoperative results of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomies with regard to duration of hospital stay, complication rates, and amount of discomfort experienced during the procedure. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on one hundred patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who were to undergo elective cholecystectomy. Patients were randomized into two groups: Among the patients, 50 patients were operated for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 50 for Open Cholecystectomy. The data on the postoperative results of the operation, including the time spent during the operation, as well as the time spent on pain, the length of stay in the hospital, and complications were collected and compared using statistical methods with the chosen level of significance equals to p ≤0.05. Results: The mean operative time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy was less than Open Cholecystectomy (48. 5 ± 12. 4 vs. 68. 5 ± 15. 3 minutes; p≤0.05). The overall postoperative pain was less in patients who undertook Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with the mean pain period of (18. 3 ± 5.2) hours compared with 30. 7 ± 7. For Open Cholecystectomy patients the time taken was 1 hours. The length of the hospital stay was also lesser in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy group which was (1.8 ± 1.2) days compared to Open Cholecystectomy group of (4.8 ± 1.5) days. Also, the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy group had less complication rate at 12% compared to the Open Cholecystectomy at 38% with p ≤0.05 Conclusion: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is shown to be more beneficial in terms of postoperative results than Open Cholecystectomy in terms of the operating time, pain, hospital stay, and complications. Thus, these results shows Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as the most appropriate surgical management for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis; however, Open Cholecystectomy will still be required for cases that are not suitable for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program comparative analysis

BackgroundData demonstrating the clinical benefit of robotic cholecystectomy over the laparoscopic approach are lacking. Herein, we aim to evaluate whether robotic cholecystectomy is associated with improved surgical outcomes compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Study DesignThis is a retrospective cohort study that used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign indications in 2022. ResultsOf the 59,216 patients identified, 53,746 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 5,470 robotic. Compared with the robotic cohort, the patients in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group were older (50.4 vs 49.7 years), were of the male sex (32.7% vs 29.7%), and comprised a greater percentage of other races than White, African American, and Asian (28.6% vs 14.8%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that robotic cholecystectomy compared with the laparoscopic approach was independently associated with a lower risk of Clavien-Dindo complications grade 3 or 4 (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.98), a lower rate of conversion to open (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–0.61), and lower odds of requiring hospitalization ≥24 hours (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.81). There were no significant differences between the 2 approaches in terms of reoperation (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–1.00) and readmission (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–1.10). ConclusionRobotic cholecystectomy was independently associated with a lower risk of serious complications, lower rate conversion to open, and hospitalization ≥24 hours compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings suggest that new technologies might enhance the safety of minimally invasive surgery.

Predictors of the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis.

The predictors of difficulty performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for grade II acute cholecystitis have not been clearly understood. This retrospective study was performed between January 2019 and February 2023 and involved 102 eligible patients with grade II acute cholecystitis. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: difficult LC group (n=14) and nondifficult LC group (n=88). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, and a logistic regression model was used for multivariate analyses of the significant factors identified in the univariate analyses. Logistic multivariable regression analysis revealed that C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (odds ratio [OR]: 1.028, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.013-1.044; P <0.05), and time intervals between PTGBD and LC (OR: 1.047, 95% CI: 1.003-1.092; P =0.034) were independent predictors of difficult LC. When preoperative CRP was >154mg/L, LC difficulty, blood loss, and operative time increased ( P <0.05, P =0.01, P =0.01, respectively) compared with CRP <154mg/L. Difficult LC, increased blood loss, and longer operative time occurred more frequently when the interval between PTGBD and LC was >35 days compared with <35 days ( P <0.05, P =0.003, P =0.002, respectively). CRP levels >154mg/L and intervals between PTGBD and LC exceeding 35 days are associated with greater LC difficulty.

Minimally invasive approach in a rare emergency surgery, gallbladder perforation

BackgroundGallbladder perforations are challenging to manage for surgeons due to their high morbidity and mortality, rarity, and surgical approach. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now included with open cholecystectomy in surgical managing gallbladder perforations. This study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in cases of type I gallbladder perforation according to the Modified Niemeier classification.MethodsPatients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: LC and conversion to open cholecystectomy (COC). Demographic, clinical, radiologic, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were compared between groups.ResultsThis study included 42 patients who met the inclusion criteria, of which 28 were in the LC group and 14 were in the COC group. Their median age was 68 (55–85) years. Age did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.218). However, the sex distribution did differ significantly between groups (p = 0.025). The location of the perforation differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001). In the LC group, 22 patients were perforated from the fundus, four from the trunk, and two from the neck. In the COC group, two patients were perforated from the fundus, four from the trunk, and eight from the neck. Surgical procedure times differed significantly between the LC (105.0 min [60–225]) and COC (125.0 min [110–180]) groups (p = 0.035). The age of the primary surgeons also differed significantly between the LC (42 years [34–63]) and COC (55 years [36–59]) groups (p = 0.001).ConclusionsLC can be safely performed for modified Niemeier type I gallbladder perforations. The proximity of the perforation site to Calot’s triangle, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and Tokyo classification are factors affecting conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery of gallbladder perforations.

Evaluating the Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Cholecystectomy in a Community Hospital Setting

Background: Gallstone obstruction is the most common reason for presenting acute cholecystitis (AC), where inflammation may have dire consequences. Given that the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) process is minimally invasive and more beneficial than other surgical operations such as open cholecystectomy (OC). Methods: This was a prospective observational study comparing LC and OC in a one-year follow-up from a community hospital in Larkana. Descriptive statistics and inferential tests apply to collect and analyze data on patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative problems, and recovery factors. Results: Out of the 70 patients, 50 had LC, and 20 had OC. Significantly shorter hospital stays (2.3±1.1 days) and surgical times (75.2±20.4 minutes vs. 105.6±25.3 minutes, p&lt;0.001) were linked to LC. The LC group experienced shorter recovery times (10.4± 3.7 days vs. 18.6±5.2 days, p&lt;0.001) and lower postoperative pain levels (3.2±1.1 vs. 5.6±1.7, p&lt;0.001). Although the OC group had proportionally greater rates of gastrointestinal problems, wound infections, and bleeding, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: A shorter operative time, less hospitalization, less postoperative pain score, and faster recovery were observed with LC compared to OC. Further studies are needed to confirm these results; thus, LC is recommended as the surgical strategy of choice for AC. Keywords: Gallstones, Pain, Operation, Recovery.

Analysis of quality of life in patients after transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery.

At present, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the main surgical treatment for gallstones. But, after gallbladder removal, there are many complications. Therefore, it is hoped to remove stones while preserving the function of the gallbladder, and with the development of endoscopic technology, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery came into being. To compare the quality of life, perioperative indicators, adverse events after LC and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery (EGPS) in patients with gallstones. Patients who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from 2020 to 2022 were retrospectively collected. We adopted propensity score matching (1:1) to compare EGPS and LC patients. A total of 662 cases were collected, of which 589 cases underwent LC, and 73 cases underwent EGPS. Propensity score matching was performed, and 40 patients were included in each of the groups. In the EGPS group, except the gastrointestinal defecation (P = 0.603), the total score, physical well-being, mental well-being, and gastrointestinal digestion were statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery (P < 0.05). In the LC group, except the mental well-being, the total score, physical well-being, gastrointestinal digestion, the gastrointestinal defecation was statistically significant compared with the preoperative score after surgery (P < 0.05). When comparing between groups, gastrointestinal defecation had significantly difference (P = 0.002) between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the total postoperative score and the other three subscales. In the surgery duration, hospital stay and cost, LC group were lower than EGPS group. The recurrence factors of gallstones after EGPS were analyzed: and recurrence was not correlated with gender, age, body mass index, number of stones, and preoperative score. Whether EGPS or LC, it can improve the patient's symptoms, and the EGPS has less impact on the patient's defecation. It needed to, prospective, multicenter, long-term follow-up, large-sample related studies to prove.

Laparoscopic Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy: Is Incidental Gallbladder Cancer Any Different?

A majority of gallbladder cancers presentincidentally. Operative risk factors and outcomes for laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy in incidental gallbladder cancer are not well characterized. Patients with incidental gallbladder cancer and acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conversion to open cholecystectomy in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) from 2010-2019 were reviewed. The primary endpoint was risk factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy in incidental gallbladder cancer. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables.Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. A total of 5,789 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were identified, of which, 50 (0.9%) had incidental gallbladder cancer. Forincidental gallbladder cancer patients, there were no differences in preoperative profile and risk factors between laparoscopic and converted to open cholecystectomy groups. Incidental carcinoma patients undergoing conversion to open cholecystectomy had lower preoperative sodium levels than the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (P=0.007). Hospital length of stay (days) was longer for those with a conversion to open cholecystectomy for incidental carcinoma compared to non-conversion, 14 (10.8, 18.8) vs 2 (0.3, 5) (P=0.004). The patients converted to open cholecystectomy also had higher rates of postoperative sepsis (50% vs 0%, P<0.001) and reoperation than the laparoscopic cohort (50% vs 2.2%, P<0.001). Readmission and mortality rates, among other complications, were not significantly different between both surgical approaches in incidental gallbladder cancer patients. Patients with conversion to open cholecystectomy had worse outcomes including longer hospital stays and higher rates of sepsis and reoperation. It remains difficult to predict which incidental gallbladder patients will require a conversion to open surgery. Further study examining whether more complicated recovery results in worse oncologicoutcomes is warranted.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.

Gallstone disease is a common gastrointestinal disorder in industrialised societies. The prevalence of gallstones in the adult population is estimated to be approximately 10-15%, and around 80% remain asymptomatic. At present, cholecystectomy is the default option for people with symptomatic gallstone disease. To assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of observation/conservative management compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones in secondary care. Parallel group, multicentre patient randomised superiority pragmatic trial with up to 24 months follow-up and embedded qualitative research. Within-trial cost-utility and 10-year Markov model analyses. Development of a core outcome set for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease. Secondary care elective settings. Adults with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease referred to a secondary care setting were considered for inclusion. Participants were randomised 1: 1 at clinic to receive either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or observation/conservative management. The primary outcome was quality of life measured by area under the curve over 18 months using the Short Form-36 bodily pain domain. Secondary outcomes included the Otago gallstones' condition-specific questionnaire, Short Form-36 domains (excluding bodily pain), area under the curve over 24 months for Short Form-36 bodily pain domain, persistent symptoms, complications and need for further treatment. No outcomes were blinded to allocation. Between August 2016 and November 2019, 434 participants were randomised (217 in each group) from 20 United Kingdom centres. By 24 months, 64 (29.5%) in the observation/conservative management group and 153 (70.5%) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group had received surgery, median time to surgery of 9.0 months (interquartile range, 5.6-15.0) and 4.7 months (interquartile range 2.6-7.9), respectively. At 18 months, the mean Short Form-36 norm-based bodily pain score was 49.4 (standard deviation 11.7) in the observation/conservative management group and 50.4 (standard deviation 11.6) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The mean area under the curve over 18 months was 46.8 for both groups with no difference: mean difference -0.0, 95% confidence interval (-1.7 to 1.7); p-value 0.996; n = 203 observation/conservative, n = 205 cholecystectomy. There was no evidence of differences in quality of life, complications or need for further treatment at up to 24 months follow-up. Condition-specific quality of life at 24 months favoured cholecystectomy: mean difference 9.0, 95% confidence interval (4.1 to 14.0), p < 0.001 with a similar pattern for the persistent symptoms score. Within-trial cost-utility analysis found observation/conservative management over 24 months was less costly than cholecystectomy (mean difference -£1033). A non-significant quality-adjusted life-year difference of -0.019 favouring cholecystectomy resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £55,235. The Markov model continued to favour observation/conservative management, but some scenarios reversed the findings due to uncertainties in longer-term quality of life. The core outcome set included 11 critically important outcomes from both patients and healthcare professionals. The results suggested that in the short term (up to 24 months) observation/conservative management may be a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources in selected patients, but subsequent surgeries in the randomised groups and differences in quality of life beyond 24 months could reverse this finding. Future research should focus on longer-term follow-up data and identification of the cohort of patients that should be routinely offered surgery. This trial is registered as ISRCTN55215960. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/192/71) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 26. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Evaluating effectiveness and safety of combined percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis patients: Meta-analysis.

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common disease in general surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is widely recognized as the "gold standard" surgical procedure for treating AC. For low-risk patients without complications, LC is the recommended treatment plan, but there is still controversy regarding the treatment strategy for moderate AC patients, which relies more on the surgeon's experience and the medical platform of the visiting unit. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder puncture drainage (PTGBD) can effectively alleviate gallbladder inflammation, reduce gallbladder wall edema and adhesion around the gallbladder, and create a "time window" for elective surgery. To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of LC or PTGBD combined with LC for treating AC patients, providing a theoretical basis for choosing reasonable surgical methods for AC patients. In this study, we conducted a clinical investigation regarding the combined use of PTGBD tubes for the treatment of gastric cancer patients with AC. We performed searches in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database. The search encompassed literature published from the inception of these databases to the present. Subsequently, relevant data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. A comprehensive analysis was conducted, encompassing 24 studies involving a total of 2564 patients. These patients were categorized into two groups: 1371 in the LC group and 1193 in the PTGBD + LC group. The outcomes of the meta-analysis revealed noteworthy disparities between the PTGBD + LC group and the LC group in multiple dimensions: (1) Operative time: Mean difference (MD) = 17.51, 95%CI: 9.53-25.49, P < 0.01; (2) Conversion to open surgery rate: Odds ratio (OR) = 2.95, 95%CI: 1.90-4.58, P < 0.01; (3) Intraoperative bleeding loss: MD = 32.27, 95%CI: 23.03-41.50, P < 0.01; (4) Postoperative hospital stay: MD = 1.44, 95%CI: 0.14-2.73, P = 0.03; (5) Overall postoperative complication rate: OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.45-2.43, P < 0.01; (6) Bile duct injury: OR = 2.17, 95%CI: 1.30-3.64, P = 0.003; (7) Intra-abdominal hemorrhage: OR = 2.45, 95%CI: 1.06-5.64, P = 0.004; and (8) Wound infection: OR = 0. These findings consistently favored the PTGBD + LC group over the LC group. There were no significant differences in the total duration of hospitalization [MD = -1.85, 95%CI: -4.86-1.16, P = 0.23] or bile leakage [OR = 1.33, 95%CI: 0.81-2.18, P = 0.26] between the two groups. The combination of PTGBD tubes with LC for AC treatment demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and enhanced safety, suggesting its broader application value in clinical practice.

Clinical application of ERCP concurrent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with extrahepatic bile duct stones

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and lithotomy (LCBDE) in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with bile duct stones. MethodsFrom September 2018 to January 2022, 195 patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with extrahepatic bile duct stones from Department of Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiading Central Hospital met the inclusion criteria, including 60 cases in the LC group and 86 cases in the LCBDE group. The general condition, operation success rate, complications and residual stone rate of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsIn the simultaneous operation group, 58 patients successfully performed ERCP, and the indwelling rate of the abdominal drainage tube (41.7 % vs. 95.3 %) was significantly better than that in the LCBDE group. There was no significant difference in the conversion rate to open surgery, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. In the simultaneous surgery group, 4 patients (6.7 %) developed pancreatitis after ERCP, which was cured by conservative treatment. The pain score at 6 h after operation was significantly lower than that in the LCBDE group (3.9 ± 1.6 vs 6.5 ± 2.4). There were no significant differences in biliary leakage (1.7 % vs. 4.7 %), postoperative cholangitis (5.0 % vs. 5.8 %), incision infection (3.3 % vs. 3.5 %), and bile duct stone residue rate (5.0 % vs 3.5 %) between the two groups. There was no severe pancreatitis, second operation or death. The duration of hospital stay was shortened in the concurrent operation group (5.1 ± 2.3d vs 7.9 ± 3.7d), and the operation cost was significantly higher than that in the LCBDE group (48839.9 ± 8549.5 vs 34635.9 ± 5893.7 yuan). ConclusionERCP combined with LC and LCBDE are both safe and effective methods for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic bile duct stones. The simultaneous operation group has certain advantages in patient comfort and rapid rehabilitation, which can be popularized in qualified units.

Progress and controversy in minimally invasive approach to radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer

Surgical treatment is one of the most important forms of treatment in patients with gallbladder cancer. With the development of minimally invasive technology, the feasibility, safety and efficacy of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer have received continuous attention.For patients with an early T-stage (Tis or T1a), laparoscopic simple cholecystectomy is safe and economical, with a good prognosis for postoperative patients, and it has been widely accepted and performed. Radical resection of advanced gallbladder cancer requires resection of the gallbladder, its liver bed, and other neighboring invaded organs, as well as clearance of regional lymph nodes, which requires experienced gallbladder cancer treatment teams to strictly grasp the indications, select appropriate patients, and formulate a good surgical strategy to ensure the therapeutic effect. Meanwhile, robot-assisted radical resection for gallbladder cancer has been performed in a few centers and shows good clinical potential, but more high-quality studies are needed to further evaluate its value in gallbladder cancer treatment.

Feasibility of robotic cholecystectomy at an academic center with a young robotic surgery program: a retrospective cohort study with umbrella review

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been standard of care for surgical treatment of benign gallbladder pathology for decades. With the advent of robotic surgical technology, robotic cholecystectomy (RC) has gained attention as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy. This study introduces a single-surgeon experience with laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy and an umbrella systematic review of the outcomes of both approaches. A retrospective chart review was performed at a single institution on a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder pathology. An umbrella systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. A total of 103 patients were identified; 61 patients underwent LC and 42 underwent RC. In the RC cohort, 17 cases were completed using a four-port technique while 25 were completed using a three-port technique. Patients undergoing RC were older compared to the LC group (44.78 vs 57.02 years old; p < 0.001) and exhibited lower body mass index (29.37 vs 32.37 kg/m2, p = 0.040). No statistically significant difference in operative time or need for postoperative ERCP was noted. Neither this series nor the umbrella systematic review revealed significant differences in conversion to open surgery or readmissions between the LC and RC cohorts. Three-port RC was associated with reduced operative time compared to four-port RC (101.28 vs 150.76 min; p < 0.001). Robotic cholecystectomy is feasible and safe at a young robotic surgery program in an academic center setting and comparable to laparoscopic cholecystectomy clinical outcomes.

Predictive Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in Acute Cholecystitis

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment in acute cholecystitis. However, one in six cases is expected to be difficult due to intense inflammation and suspected adherence to and involvement of adjacent important structures, which may predispose patients to higher risk of vascular and biliary injuries. In this study, we aimed to identify the preoperative parameters with predictive value for surgical difficulties. A retrospective study of 255 patients with acute cholecystitis admitted in emergency was performed between 2019 and 2023. Patients in the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) group experienced more complications compared to the normal LC group (33.3% vs. 15.3%, p &lt; 0.001). Age (p = 0.009), male sex (p = 0.03), diabetes (p = 0.02), delayed presentation (p = 0.03), fever (p = 0.004), and a positive Murphy sign (p = 0.007) were more frequently encountered in the DLC group. Total leukocytes, neutrophils, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly higher in the DLC group (p &lt; 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001 respectively). The Tongyoo score (AUC ROC of 0.856) and a multivariate model based on serum fibrinogen, thickness of the gallbladder wall, and transverse diameter of the gallbladder (AUC ROC of 0.802) showed a superior predictive power when compared to independent parameters. The predictive factors for DLC should be assessed preoperatively to optimize the therapeutic decision.

Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with CBD excision in gallbladder cancer patients with biliary obstruction

Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with CBD excision in gallbladder cancer patients with biliary obstruction

CONVERSION OF LAPAROSCOPIC TO OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Background: Globally, gallstone disease (GS) is a significant health issue, especially for adults although cholecystitis is common, there is an evidence of variance in its diagnosis and course of therapy, including surgery. In place of open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the preferred course of treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. In situations where laparoscopic cholecystectomy is dangerous; a surgeon may be forced to change from laparoscopy to an open procedure. The aim of the study was to clarify the benefits and role of minimally invasive surgery in comparison to the open conventional method of cholecystectomy, with a focus on the postoperative phase and to compare the ratio of Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy between male and female genders. Methods: 185 Patients of cholecystitis aged between 10 years to 80 years (86.5% males and 13.5% females) were presented to Zawia Medical Center during the period from March 2005 till April 2006 that randomly get an open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They were divided into open and laparoscopic Cholecystectomy group. Results: In this study, a total of 185 patients were included: 160 females (86.5% of the total) and 25 males (13.5% of the total). Whereas, 86 females (53.7%) were operated on by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and 74 females (46%) were operated on by open cholecystectomy. In comparison, of a total of 25 males, 12 (48%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 13 (52%) underwent open cholecystectomy. The conversion rate was eight cases (8.2%) due to technical, bleeding, or massive adhesion. Conclusion: From this study, we concluded that the laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy ratio (female: male ratio) was 86.5% to 13.5% of the total 185 patients, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be a safe procedure with quick recovery, early discharge from the hospital, and less postoperative pain as compared to open cholecystectomy.

Cystic Duct Exploration in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Bile duct injury (BDI) is a severe complication following cholecystectomy and is therefore a particularly concerning surgical predicament for hepatobiliary surgeons. Owing to very high medical compensation awarded to patients suffering from BDI, surgeons need to exercise caution during surgery to avoid BDI. Herein, we explored a novel method to identify cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), expanding the applicability of this surgical approach. Patients receiving LC between April 2021 and October 2022 at the Gaoyou People's Hospital were included in this retrospective clinical study and divided into two groups according to whether the cystic duct was incised (one group with LC alone, while another with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and cystic duct exploration [LCCDE]). Clinical and baseline characteristics of patients were collected, and the preoperative and postoperative biochemical parameters were compared. The surgical outcomes of LCCDE were observed. A total of 114 patients had undergone LC, while 162 patients had received LCCDE as treatment. There were no significant differences in age, gender, common bile duct diameter, preoperative and postoperative biochemical parameters between the two groups. No significant difference in the mean operation time between the LC and LCCDE groups was noted (p = 0.409). In the LCCDE group, white secretions in the cystic duct were observed in 92 patients (56.8%). The presence of intraoperative white secretions in the cystic duct may further confirm the presence of cystic duct, thereby enabling earlier detection of BDI. Importantly, LCCDE, as the new surgical method explored in this study, does not extend the operation time.

Comparative Analysis of Haemodynamic and Capnographic Changes in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Open Cholecystectomy: A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now preferred over the open procedure due to advantages such as reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential for increased Intra-abdominal Pressure (IAP) during laparoscopic procedures, which may impact haemodynamic stability and respiratory parameters. However, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis directly comparing both surgical approaches from both haemodynamic and capnographic perspectives. Aim: To compare the haemodynamic and capnographic changes between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was conducted at Department of Anaesthesiology, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam, India from May 2021 to June 2022. The study included 300 patients scheduled for cholecystectomy, divided into two groups: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) Group I (n=150) and Open Cholecystectomy (OC) Group II (n=150). Haemodynamic parameters, including Pulse Rate (PR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), and Oxygen Saturation (SpO2 ), were recorded. Capnographic parameters, such as End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO2 ) levels, were also measured at regular intervals. Data analysis was performed using the student’s t-test and Chi-square test with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 software and Microsoft excel. Results: There were no significant differences in age, body weight, and sex distribution between Group I and Group II. However, significant differences were observed in PR and SBP at 15 minutes (PR: 101.46 and 95.86; SBP: 148.57 and 140.97), 30 minutes (PR: 104.52 and 99.82; SBP: 141.28 and 136.07), and 45 minutes (PR: 102.52 and 97.70; SBP: 140.59 and 133.95) (p-value &lt;0.01). Highly significant differences were observed in MAP and EtCO2 postinsufflation at 15 minutes (MAP: 118.38 and 108.61; EtCO2: 36.48 and 33.89), 30 minutes (MAP: 111.11 and 106.01; EtCO2: 41.02 and 36.15), 45 minutes (MAP: 110.73 and 103.48; EtCO2: 42.65 and 38.36), and 60 minutes (MAP: 106.08 and 101.45; EtCO2: 41.10 and 38.21) (p-value &lt;0.01). DBP showed high significance at 15 minutes (103.21 and 93.23), 30 minutes (96.74 and 92.57), and 60 minutes (93.14 and 86.92) (p-value &lt;0.01), and significant (p-value=0.01) at 45 minutes (95.53 and 87.59). Oxygen saturation showed significance (p-value &lt;0.05) at 15 minutes (99.93 and 100). Conclusion: The present study demonstrated a significant increase in both haemodynamic and capnographic parameters, even in American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Grade-I and Grade-II patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to the open surgical technique. These findings emphasise the need for careful monitoring during laparoscopic procedures.

Early outcomes of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with CBD excision in gallbladder cancer patients

Early outcomes of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with CBD excision in gallbladder cancer patients

Effectiveness of conservative management versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the prevention of recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease (C-GALL trial): pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of conservative management compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the prevention of symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease.DesignParallel group, pragmatic...

A Medium-Term Comparison of Quality of Life and Pain After Robotic or Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

IntroductionWe sought to compare medium-term outcomes between robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) using validated quality of life (QoL) and pain assessments. Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent RC or LC between 2012 and 2017 at a single academic institution were examined. Cases converted to open were excluded. Patients were contacted by telephone in 2019 and completed two standardized surveys to rate their QoL and pain. ResultsOf those screened, 122 (35.8%) completed both surveys. Ninety three (76.2%) underwent RC and 29 (23.8%) underwent LC. The groups (RC versus LC) were similar based on mean age (47.9 versus 45.5 y, P = 0.48), gender (66.7% versus 72.4% female, P = 0.56), race (86.0% White/5.4% Black versus 72.4% White/13.8% Black, P = 0.2), insurance status (98.9% versus 100.0% insured, P = 0.58), median body mass index (31.8 versus 31.3, P = 0.43), and median Charlson Comorbidity Index (1 versus 0, P = 0.14). Fewer RC patients had a history of steroid use compared to LC (16.1% versus 34.5%, P = 0.03). No overall significant difference in QoL was demonstrated. LC group had higher severity of “tiring-exhausting pain” (P = 0.04), “electric-shock pain” (P = 0.003), and “shooting pain” (P = 0.05). The “overall intensity” of pain in the “gallbladder region” between the groups was similar at the time of follow-up (P = 0.31). ConclusionsQoL over 2-7 y following time of surgery is comparable for robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The laparoscopic approach may be associated with a higher severity of subset categories of pain, but overall pain between the two approaches is comparable.