Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Research Articles

Comparison of Superselective Renal Artery Embolization versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Ruptured Hemorrhagic Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Single-Center Study

Purpose: To analyze the clinical efficacy of superselective renal artery embolization and retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of ruptured hemorrhagic renal angiomyolipoma and to provide a reference for the selection of treatment methods for ruptured hemorrhagic renal angiomyolipoma. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 24 patients who were diagnosed with ruptured hemorrhagic renal angiomyolipoma at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between January 2019 and December 2021. Among them, 10 patients were treated with superselective arterial embolization (SAE), and 14 patients were treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic part nephrectomy (RLPN). The differences between the two treatment methods in terms of hospital stay, hospital costs, anesthesia method, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest time, antibiotic dosage, postoperative complication rate, tumor diameter changes, creatinine value changes, hemoglobin value changes, tumor recurrence rate, and reoperation rate were compared. Results: All patients completed the treatment and were discharged. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, hospital costs, creatinine change values, or postoperative complication rates between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in surgical time (85.50 ± 19.94 min vs. 141.07 ± 76.33 min), intraoperative blood loss (21.50 ± 14.72 mL vs. 153.57 ± 97.00 mL), postoperative bed rest time (22.7 ± 1.56 h vs. 41.21 ± 3.57 h), preoperative hemoglobin levels (94.7 ± 23.62 g/L vs. 113.79 ± 17.83 g/L), and hemoglobin changes (−6.60 ± 10.36 g/L vs. −15.21 ± 8.79 g/L) between the two groups. Both groups of patients had an average follow-up period of 22 months, and patients in the SAE group had a mean reduction of 3.33 cm in tumor diameter within the follow-up period compared with the pre-embolization period (p < 0.05). None of the patients in the SAE group experienced rebleeding, and there was no tumor recurrence in either group. Conclusion: SAE and RLPN are effective treatments for ruptured renal angiomyolipoma with good outcomes. Furthermore, compared to RLPN, SAE offers advantages such as simplicity of operation, minimal trauma, shorter surgical time, minimal impact on hemoglobin levels, shorter bed rest time, faster postoperative recovery, and maximal preservation of renal units.

PE063 Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with cystic features: Comparison of perioperative outcomes and trifecta achievement

PE063 Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with cystic features: Comparison of perioperative outcomes and trifecta achievement

PJY17 Impact of clinical risk factors, tumor characteristics, PADUA and RENAL scores on warm ischemia time during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

PJY17 Impact of clinical risk factors, tumor characteristics, PADUA and RENAL scores on warm ischemia time during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

PE073 Analysis of risk factors of postoperative complications in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy patients

PE073 Analysis of risk factors of postoperative complications in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy patients

Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes after Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients aged 70 years or older following retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and compare their results with younger patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database identified 329 patients who underwent retroperitoneal LPN from January 2013 to October 2022. The patients divided into 2 groups defined by age ≥70 or <70 years at the time of surgery. A propensity score matching analysis was conducted to obtain two balanced groups. The groups were compared for safety (perioperative outcomes) and efficacy (oncological and functional outcomes). Results: After matching, all variables were well balanced with no differences between the two cohorts. No significant differences were found in perioperative outcomes, including operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications (P values >.05). Concerning functional outcomes, postoperative glomerular filtration rate and decrease in glomerular filtration rate were significantly better in the younger group compared with the elderly groups (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively). Although margin, ischemia, complications rates were similar between the cohorts (P = .068), Pentafecta rates were lower in the elderly patients (P = .029). In terms of oncological outcomes, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal LPN can be performed safely and with adequate oncological efficacy in elderly patients.

From sutureless to standard: a comprehensive analysis of conversion rates in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

ObjectiveTo assess the rate at which sutureless partial nephrectomy (SLPN) transitions to standard partial nephrectomy (SPN), focusing on preoperative factors that might prompt such conversions.Patients and methodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed the efficacy of SLPN performed on adults at our institution from 2016 to 2023. The subjects were patients diagnosed with localized solid renal tumors. The primary technique employed was resection with scissors and argon beam coagulation for hemostasis, with suturing techniques used only when necessary. Predictive factors necessitating conversion to SPN were identified, and the associations among multiple variables were explored using various statistical analysis methods, including logistic regression, to identify key preoperative predictive factors.ResultsOur institution performed 353 SLPN, with 21 cases (5.9%) necessitating conversion to SPN. The conversion rates for the Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN) subgroup and the Robotic-assist Partial Nephrectomy (RPN) subgroup were 7.9% (17/215) and 2.9% (4/138), respectively, nearing statistical significance (P = .066). Significant differences were observed between the conversion group and the no conversion group in terms of preoperative estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), age at surgery, tumor size, and exophytic/endophytic characteristics. Multivariate analysis identified age at surgery, preoperative eGFR, radiological tumor size, and tumor exophytic/endophytic nature as significant predictors for conversion to SPN.ConclusionThis investigation highlights the efficacy and feasibility of SLPN while identifying critical factors influencing the necessity for conversion to SPN. The identified predictors, including younger surgical age, superior preoperative eGFR, and specific tumor characteristics, provide valuable insights for refining surgical strategies.

Study of complications in partial nephrectomies in 1 year period at tertiary care cancer hospital

Background: Incidental diagnosis of small renal masses are increasing now a days due to increased use of imaging by ultrasound or cross sectional investigations done for other reason or routine screening. This has led to evolution in management of small renal masses and changes in treatment modalities directed towards nephron sparing procedures. Partial nephrectomy has evolved from open, laparoscopic to Robotic-assisted procedures. There have been studies on laparoscopic partial nephrectomy but no studies have been done in our country and no comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Materials and Methods: Cases who underwent partial nephrectomy from January 2021 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Altogether 46 patients underwent partial nephrectomy in open or laparoscopic surgery. The demographic data, pre-operative, per-operative and post-operative parameters were collected and tabulated. The early complications were defined as the complications that occurred during hospital stay or within 30 days of surgery. These were noted and classified according to Clavein-Dindo Classification. Data collected analyzed using SPSS 25 software. Results: We observed an overall complication rate of 49% vs 56% in laparoscopic group vs open group; In contrary, 13% vs 4.3% patients experienced high grade complications. The mortality rate was 0%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy had a steep learning curve. With maturity, the complications rates are not more than that of open surgery.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for small renal masses

Background: Due to the increased use of imaging modalities in daily medical practices, more and more small renal masses are detected. For these SRMs, nephron sparing procedures are more commonly opted rather than radical nephrectomy for the sake of preservation of renal function and proven similar oncological outcomes. This surgery has evolved from open, laparoscopic to Robot-assisted approaches. This article summarizes our institutional experience of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: Patients with small renal masses who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy at B.P. Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were retrospectively retrieved. Altogether 23 case notes fulfilled the criteria for analysis. All the demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative data were collected form the notes and plotted. All the issues within 30 days of surgery were defined as early complications. Clavein-Dindo Classification used for analysis. SPSS 25 software was used. Results: Twenty three patients underwent partial nephrectomy with lapascopic method. All were done trans-peritoneally. Average age of patient was 50.96±12.8 years with range of 33-76. Male were 14 and 9 were females. Average hospital stay was 8 days. The majority of patients after PN recovered well. Nonetheless, 8 developed postoperative complications. GI complications were 8.7%, infections related 13%, Wound related 8.7% and others. Two patients (8.3%) were required to undergo reoperation and nephrectomy for haematuria. Conclusion: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a surgery with steep learning curve. As it requires advanced laparoscopic suturing skills, complications in early period was common. After maturity the complications are as par to open PN.

Ischemia time in partial nephrectomy: to rush really matters?

Aim: The growth in the incidence of small renal masses has led the implementation of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to become the technique of choice. However, arterial clamping and secondary renal ischemia still mean a controversial issue due to the risk of renal failure. Our objective is to evaluate the existing literature and its relationship to our experience. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of our series over six years. We analyzed different clinical, perioperative and postoperative functional outcome variables and compared the relationship between tumor complexity and the need for ischemia as well as the relation between ischemia time and renal function over a follow-up time of 6 months. For the discussion, we led a review of the literature on the subject and the paradigm shift that has taken place over the years. Results: A total of 148 patients, most of them male (68.2%) with an average age of 62.4 [standard deviation (SD) 1.7] years, had a Charlson index of 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-4]. The average R.E.N.A.L. score was 6 (IQR 5-8). Intraoperative complications were observed in 8.1% of the cases, most of which involved bleeding from a major artery or vein (7.4%). Postoperative complications occurred in 23.6% of the patients, the majority being classified as Clavien 2. Arterial clamping was carried out in 52.7% of the interventions, with a median ischemia time of 8 min (IQR 0-18). The average hospital stay was three days (IQR 2-5). Previous median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 83 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 66.2-93.6). On the first postoperative day, the median GFR was 78.4 (SD 21.8), and at 6 months, it was 75.2 (SD 22). We found no statistically significant differences between having hypertension or diabetes mellitus and GFR after surgery, but we found differences in the correlation of a Charlson index ≥ 3 and deterioration of renal function, being the P values 0.01, 0.08 and 0.00 for the first postoperative day, after three and 6 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in whether having a previous chronic kidney disease influenced the decision to perform arterial clamping or not, with a P value of 0.104. Statistically significant differences were found in the relationship between R.E.N.A.L. score and ischemia time. Conclusion: Renal tumors with a higher R.E.N.A.L. score involve the need to accomplish a longer arterial clamping, but its relationship with the deterioration of renal function is unclear, since there are other risk factors, such as patient’s comorbidities.

Intrathecal Morphine Enhances Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Study of 272 Patients.

BACKGROUND Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been increasingly used for treating renal tumors due to its advantages over other approaches. However, RAPN can induce acute incisional, peritoneal, visceral, and referred pain. Therefore, acute pain control in robotic surgery is a concern. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) for postoperative analgesia and recovery after RAPN. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent RAPN at our institute between 2020 and 2021. Among the 272 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 135 patients were administered 200 µg of ITM preoperatively (ITM group), while 137 patients were not (control group). Postoperative pain assessments using the numeric rating scale (NRS), opioid requirements, and recovery profiles during the first postoperative 24 h were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS As the primary endpoint, the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain (24-h average NRS pain score ≥4) was significantly lower in the ITM group than in the control group (36.3% vs 61.3%, P<0.001). Pain scores and cumulative opioid requirements were also significantly lower in the ITM group for all assessments (P<0.001). Moreover, the ITM group had a higher score on the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire on the first postoperative day (129 vs 120, P=0.003) despite an increased rate of postoperative nausea/vomiting (27.4% vs 13.1%, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that ITM provided superior pain control during the early period following RAPN, with reduced postoperative opioid requirements. Moreover, ITM improved patient satisfaction with recovery.

The effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in renal surgery.

To study the effect of ERAS on a textbook outcome (TO) after elective renal surgery. Retrospective study of all patients who underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomy or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST), Enschede, the Netherlands. In total, 277 patients were included. 66 patients from 2018 to 2021 (pre-ERAS group) and 211 patients from 2021 to 2023 (ERAS group). TO is a maximum of two nights in the hospital after surgery, no severe complications during or after surgery ≥ grade IIIb, no blood transfusions, no intensive care, no readmissions, and no mortality within 30days after surgery. Comparisons were made between the pre-ERAS and ERAS groups using unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for possible confounding. TO was significantly (p = 0.005) better in the ERAS group (TO = 76.8%) compared to the pre-ERAS group (TO = 59.1%). Compared to a pre-ERAS patient, the adjusted odds ratio for achieving a TO as an ERAS patient is 2.1 (95% CI 1.15-3.78). The implementation of ERAS showed a positive effect on the TO of elective renal surgery patients.

Robotic-assisted enucleation for renal masses: A comparison of on-clamp and off-clamp approach.

In surgically excising renal masses, studies have demonstrated that tumor enucleation is an effective option. However, there is limited literature comparing off-clamp to on-clamp tumor enucleation. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 189 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy via tumor enucleation by a single surgeon from March 2012 and April 2022. Patients were stratified based on use of renal hilar clamping intraoperatively. Surgical, oncologic, and renal functional outcomes were captured. Variables were analyzed and compared between the two groups using Student's T-tests and Chi-square tests. Of 189 procedures analyzed, 124 were performed on-clamp and 65 were performed off-clamp. There were no differences in patient demographics or average length of follow-up. There were no differences in estimated blood loss, complications, or hospital length of stay. Recurrence rates were similar for the two groups. The absolute difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate change between the two groups at time of first follow-up was not significant (p = 0.25). There is no significant difference in perioperative outcomes such as surgical time, blood loss, or complications between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in postoperative kidney function between the two techniques.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Is it the future of kidney surgery? A comparison of nephron-sparing techniques in partial nephrectomy

Technological advancements are significantly transforming various medical fields, including urology. The increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques and robotic assistance is particularly impactful. Three partial nephrectomy techniques are investigated: open partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Among these, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is considered to be superior due to shorter warm ischemia time, reduced blood loss, better early renal functional preservation, and shorter hospital stays. The zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy concept aims to improve postoperative kidney function outcomes. The integration of robotic technology and advancements in artificial intelligence and surgical training systems are expected to further enhance surgical techniques. Artificial intelligence, particularly when combined with computer vision algorithms, shows potential for creating precise and automated three-dimensional models for surgical planning in complex robot-assisted partial nephrectomy procedures, potentially leading to better patient outcomes. This review identifies the current capabilities and prospective advancements in the application of robotic technology in partial nephrectomy.

Efficacy of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumor: a multicenter, prospective study.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors with the reported outcomes of conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and investigate the transition of renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label trial across 17 academic centers in Japan. Patients with endophytic renal tumors classified as cT1, cN0, cM0 were included and underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. We defined two primary outcomes to assess functional and oncological aspects of the procedure, which were represented by the warm ischemic time and positive surgical margin, respectively. Comparisons were made using control values previously reported in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy studies. In the historical control group, the warm ischemia time was 25.2, and the positive surgical margin was 13%. Our per-protocol analysis included 98 participants. The mean warm ischemic time was 20.3min (99% confidence interval 18.3-22.3; p < 0.0001 vs. 25.2). None of the 98 participants had a positive surgical margin (99% confidence interval 0-5.3%; p < 0.0001 vs. 13.0%). The renal function ratio of eGFR before and after protocol treatment multiplied by splits was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.75). Factors such as preoperative eGFR, resected weight, and warm ischemic time influenced the functional loss of the partially nephrectomized kidney after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors offers a shorter warm ischemia time and comparable positive surgical margin rate compared with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

The application of mixed reality navigation system in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 10): a retrospective cohort study.

The application of mixed reality navigation system in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 10): a retrospective cohort study.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Partial and Radical Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors Larger Than Four Centimeters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Earlier studies have juxtaposed different laparoscopic methods for treating renal tumors; however, extensive evidence with a particular focus on large kidney tumors remains lacking. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the perioperative outcomes, kidney performance, and cancer-related results of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for treating extensive, localized, non-metastatic kidney tumors (cT1b-cT2N0M0). We systematically searched multiple databases from database inception until December 2023 for relevant studies. Selected data were analyzed with the Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.4 software using a random-effects model. Outcomes were expressed as odds ratios and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, considering a P value of < 0.05 as significant. Data from nine studies encompassing 1,303 patients (529 LPN, 774 LRN) revealed that LPN was associated with lengthier surgeries and increased blood loss compared to LRN. While LPN exhibited higher postoperative complication rates, the disparity did not reach statistical significance. LPN led to improved postoperative renal function, manifesting as a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and fewer incidents of new chronic kidney disease cases. Both groups demonstrated comparable tumor recurrence and overall mortality rates, but LPN exhibited significantly lower cancer-specific mortality rates. LPN, despite longer operative times and greater intraoperative blood loss, was found to be superior to LRN in preserving postoperative renal function. Oncologically, LPN and LRN have comparable overall mortality rates, but LPN showed a significant advantage in terms of lower cancer-specific mortality rates.

Fascial Plane Blocks With Glucocorticoids or Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Local Infiltration for Laparoscopic Non-donor Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighted Study.

Study objective The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks (FPBs) versus local infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic non-donor nephrectomy. This study specifically compares the efficacy of FPBs with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus FPBs with dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DXP) and methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) versus surgical site local anesthetic infiltration without FPBs. Design This is a retrospective cohort study conducted over a five-year period (January 2018-December 2022). Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary care, academic, multi-hospital healthcare system. Participants Patients who underwent elective radical or partial laparoscopic non-donor nephrectomy were included in the study. Intervention Patients either received preoperative FPBs without intraoperative surgical site local anesthetic infiltration or received surgical site local anesthetic infiltration without FPBs (n = 141) at participating hospitals. Measurements The primary endpoint of this study was postoperative opioid use, measured as oral milligram morphine equivalents (MME). Secondary endpoints included postoperative pain scores, length of hospital stays, and significant adverse events within 30 days. The impact of medications utilized in FPBs was determined by univariate and multivariable analyses with covariates balancing propensity score weighting. Main results Patients undergoing non-donor laparoscopic radical or partial nephrectomy who received FPBs with bupivacaine or ropivacaine plus glucocorticoids DXP and MPA were more likely to be opioid-free 24-48 hours postoperatively compared to those who received FPBs with LB or surgical site local anesthetic infiltration without FPBs (40.5% vs. 30% vs. 13.9%, respectively; p = 0.017). Patients who received FPBs with glucocorticoids also reported the lowest pain scores at rest and with activity 0-12 hours postoperatively as compared to patients who received LB or local infiltration (p = 0.006 and p = 0.014, respectively). Additionally, patients who received FPBs with glucocorticoids received over 30% fewer opioids during the first 48 hours postoperatively compared to patients who received surgical site local anesthetic infiltration alone (30 MME vs. 44 MME, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in total opioid use during the first 48 hours postoperatively between patients who received FPBs with bupivacaine plus glucocorticoids and those who received FPBs with bupivacaine plus LB (mean ratio: 0.91, (95% CI: 0.05 ~ 15.97); p = 0.948). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stays or rate of adverse events between the groups. Conclusion Perioperative FPBs for non-donor laparoscopic nephrectomy using glucocorticoids as an adjuvant to long-acting local anesthetics may decrease postoperative opioid use and reduce pain scores as compared to FPBs with LB or surgical site local anesthetic infiltration. Bupivacaine or ropivacaine combined with DXP and MPA is a safe and effective alternative to LB for FPBs in laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed by a single experienced surgeon according to two reconstruction methods, including single-layer and double-layer renorrhaphy.

This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of single-layer versus double-layer renorrhaphy in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) performed by an experienced surgeon.We enrolled 655 patients who underwent RAPN between January 2019 and June 2023. After excluding those with multiple tumors or incomplete medical records, 554 patients were included in the final analysis. We compared surgical outcomes between single-layer renorrhaphy (outer cortical closure) and double-layer renorrhaphy (inner layer suture and outer cortical closure), adjusting for preoperative factors such as sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), preoperative complications (diabetes or hypertension), surgical approach (transperitoneal or retroperitoneal), tumor size, and tumor complexity, using propensity score matching. Of the 554 patients analyzed, 59 were classified into the single-layer group and 495 into the double-layer group. Before matching, the double-layer group had more complex and larger tumors. After matching, 58 patients were included in each group. The single-layer group showed significantly shorter operative times (91min vs. 100min, p = 0.0361), lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (7.9ml vs. 27ml, p = 0.021), and better preservation of eGFR (-1.2% vs. -5.1%, p = 0.0313). Other outcomes, such as perioperative complications and postoperative hospital stay, were not significantly different between the groups. Single-layer renorrhaphy demonstrated better surgical outcomes, including shorter operative time, lower EBL, and better preservation of kidney function, compared to double-layer renorrhaphy. These findings suggest that single-layer reconstruction may optimize RAPN outcomes in selected patients.

Tumor morphology evaluation using 3D-morphometric features of renal masses.

To assess the correlation between the general (gender, age, and maximum tumor size) and 3D morphotopometric features of the renal tumor node, following the MSCT data post-processing, and the tumor histological structure; to propose an equation allowing for kidney malignancy assessment based on general and morphometric features. In total, 304 patients with unilateral solitary renal neoplasms underwent laparoscopic (retroperitoneoscopic) or robotic partial or radical nephrectomy. Before the procedure, kidney contrast-enhanced MSCT followed by the tumor 3D-modeling was performed. 3D model of the kidney tumor, and its morphotopometric features, and histological structure were analyzed. The morphotopometric ones include the side of the lesion, location by segments, the surface where the tumor, the depth of the tumor invasion into the kidney, and the shape of tumor. Out of 304 patients, 254 (83.6%) had malignant kidney tumors and 50 (16.4%) benign kidney tumors. In total, 231 patients, out of 254 (90.9%) were assessed for the degree of malignant tumor differentiation. Malignant tumors were more frequent in men than in women (p < 0.001). Mushroom-shaped tumors were the most common shapes among benign renal masses (35.2%). The most common malignant kidney tumors had spherical with a partially uneven surface (27.6%), multinodular (tuberous (27.2%)), and spherical with a conical base (24.8%) shapes. Logistic regression model enabled the development of prognostic equation for tumor malignancy prediction ("low" or "high"). The univariate analysis revealed the correlation only between high differentiation (G1) and a spherical tumor with a conical base (p = 0.029). The resulting logistic model, based on the analysis of such predictors as gender and form of kidney lesions, demonstrated a large share (87.6%) of correct predictions of the kidney tumor malignancy.

Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors with Cystic Features: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Trifecta Achievement

Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors with Cystic Features: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Trifecta Achievement