Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Research Articles

Five-Year Outcomes from a Prospective Study on Safety and Efficacy of Phasix ST Mesh Use at the Hiatus During Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair has a high hernia recurrence rate. The aim of this study was to assess the 5-year hernia recurrence rate after PEH repair using a combination of bioresorbable mesh and advanced surgical techniques to address tension as needed in a prospective group of patients. In 2016, a prospective database was established for 50 patients undergoing primary, elective PEH repair with a new bioresorbable mesh (Phasix ST). Intraoperatively, tension was addressed with Collis gastroplasty and diaphragm relaxing incisions as needed. All 50 patients from the initial study were tracked and asked to return for objective follow-up. Recurrence was considered present for any hernia more than 2 cm in size. Objective follow-up was conducted in 27 of the original 50 (54%) patients at a median of 5.25 years after their PEH repair. Before the 5-year follow-up, 5 patients had a known recurrent hernia. Objective evaluation at 5 years identified an additional 3 recurrences, for a total recurrence rate of 25% (8 of 32 patients). The hernia recurrence rate in patients with a Collis gastroplasty was significantly lower than in those without a Collis (7% vs 54%, p = 0.008). Two patients underwent reoperation for hernia recurrence. No patient had a mesh infection or mesh erosion. The combination of Phasix ST Mesh and tension-reducing techniques during PEH repair led to a 25% hernia recurrence rate at 5 years. The addition of a Collis gastroplasty led to significantly fewer hernia recurrences and is indicative of the potential for esophageal shortening in many patients with a PEH. The long-term safety and efficacy of Phasix ST Mesh in combination with surgical technique for PEH repair is confirmed.

Risk factors associated with radiological and clinical recurrences after laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia with TiO2Mesh™ reinforcement.

Laparoscopic repair of large para-esophageal hiatal hernias (LPHH) remains controversial. Several meta-analyses suggest hiatus reinforcement with mesh has better outcomes over cruroplasty in terms of less recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results of treating LPHH with a biosynthetic monofilament polypropylene mesh coated with titanium dioxide to enhance biocompatibility (TiO2Mesh™). A retrospective observational study, using data extracted from a prospectively collected database was performed at XXX from December 2014 to June 2023. Included participants were all patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of large (> 5cm) type III hiatal hernia in which a TiO2Mesh™ was used. The results of the study, including clinical and radiological recurrences as well as mesh-related morbidity, were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients were finally analyzed. Laparoscopic approach was attempted in all but conversion was needed in one patient because of bleeding in the lesser curvature. With a median follow-up of 41months (and 10 losses to follow-up), 22% of radiological recurrences and 19.3% of clinical recurrences were described. Regarding complications, one patient presented morbidity associated with the mesh (mesh erosion requiring endoscopic extraction). Recurrent hernia repair was an independent factor of clinical recurrence (OR 4.57 95% CI (1.28-16.31)). LPHH with TiO2Mesh™ is safe and feasible with a satisfactory medium-term recurrence and a low complication rate. Prospective randomized studies are needed to establish the standard repair of LPHH.

Invited Commentary: Can More Liberal Use of Collis Gastroplasty in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Reduce Recurrence?

Invited Commentary: Can More Liberal Use of Collis Gastroplasty in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Reduce Recurrence?

OGBN O07 Factors in recurrence following 862 giant paraesophageal hernia repairs

Abstract Background Repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is associated with a considerable hernia recurrence rate by objective measures. This study evaluated trends in outcomes of laparoscopic non-mesh repair of giant PEH over 30 years, and factors associated with anatomical recurrence. Methods Data was extracted from a single-surgeon prospective database of laparoscopic repair of giant PEH from 1991-2021. Upper endoscopy was performed within 12 months postoperatively and selectively thereafter. Any supra-diaphragmatic stomach was defined as anatomical recurrence. Cases were chronologically divided into tertiles with trends in casemix, operative factors and outcomes evaluated. Patient and hernia characteristics, and technical operative factors, including “composite repair” (360-degree fundoplication with esophagopexy and cardiopexy to right crus), were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Results 862 repairs met selection criteria. Mean age 69.3years, majority(65.8%) female and hernia type III(87.4%) with median hernia size 66%. There was an increasing proportion of “composite repair” after the first decade(Group1, 2.7%;Group2, 81.9%;Group3, 100%;p<0.001).There were less anatomical hernia recurrence(Group1, 36.6%;Group2, 22.9%;Group3, 22.7%;p<0.001) over time. The overall anatomical recurrence rate was 27.3% with median followup 33months(IQR 16, 68). There were 10(1.2%) Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications including two perioperative deaths(0.2%). Multivariate analysis identified age<70years, presence of Barrett’s, absence of “composite repair”, and hiatus closure under tension as independent factors associated with recurrence(HR1.27,95%CI0.88-1.82,p=0.01;HR1.58,95%CI1.12-2.23,p=0.009;HR1.72,95%CI1.2-2.44,p=0.002;HR2.05,95%CI1.33-3.17,p=0.001,respectively). Conclusions Hernia recurrence rates decreased with increasing case volume. This coincided with the increasing adoption of “composite repair”, supporting the possible improvement in recurrence rates with this approach. Repair was associated with substantial anatomical recurrence associated with patient and technique factors. Patient factors included age <70 years, Barrett’s esophagus, and hiatus tension. “Composite repair” was associated with lower recurrence rate.

Recurrence in Paraesophageal Hernia: Patient Factors and Composite Surgical Repair in 862 Cases

BackgroundRepair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is associated with a considerable hernia recurrence rate by objective measures. This study analyzed a large series of laparoscopic giant PEH repair to determine factors associated with anatomical recurrence. MethodData was extracted from a single-surgeon prospective database of laparoscopic repair of giant PEH from 1991 to 2021. Upper endoscopy was performed within 12 months postoperatively and selectively thereafter. Any supra-diaphragmatic stomach was defined as anatomical recurrence. Patient and hernia characteristics and technical operative factors, including “composite repair” (360° fundoplication with esophagopexy and cardiopexy to right crus), were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analysis. ResultsLaparoscopic primary repair was performed in 862 patients. The anatomical recurrence rate was 27.3% with median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 16, 68). Recurrence was symptomatic in 45% of cases and 29% of these underwent a revision operation. Hernia recurrence was associated with younger age, adversely affected quality of life, and were associated with non-composite repair. Multivariate analysis identified age < 70 years, presence of Barrett’s esophagus, absence of “composite repair”, and hiatus closure under tension as independent factors associated with recurrence (HR 1.27, 95%CI 0.88–1.82, p = 0.01; HR 1.58, 95%CI 1.12–2.23, p = 0.009; HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.2–2.44, p = 0.002; HR 2.05, 95%CI 1.33–3.17, p = 0.001, respectively). ConclusionRepair of giant PEH is associated with substantial anatomical recurrence associated with patient and technique factors. Patient factors included age < 70 years, Barrett’s esophagus, and hiatus tension. “Composite repair” was associated with lower recurrence rate.

The value of "diaphragmatic relaxing incision" for the durability of the crural repair in patients with paraesophageal hernia: a double blind randomized clinical trial.

Surgical repair of paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) is burdened with high recurrence rates, and hitherto various techniques explored to enforce the traditional crural repair have not been successful. The hiatal reconstruction in PEH is exposed to significant tension, which may be minimized by adding a diaphragmatic relaxing incision to enhance the durability of the crural repair. All individuals undergoing elective laparoscopic repair of a large PEH, irrespective of age, were considered eligible. PEHs were classified into types II-IV. The preoperative work-up program included multidetector computed tomography and symptom assessment questionnaires, which will be repeated during the postoperative follow-up. Patients were randomly divided into a control group with crural repair alone and an intervention group with the addition of a left-sided diaphragmatic relaxing incision at the edge of the upper pole of the spleen. The diaphragmatic defect was then covered by a synthetic mesh. The primary endpoint of this trial was the rate of anatomical PEH recurrence at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, odynophagia, gas bloat, regurgitation, chest pain, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, postprandial pain, cardiovascular and pulmonary symptoms, and patient satisfaction in the immediate postoperative course (3 months) and at 1 year. Postoperative complications, morbidity, and disease burden were recorded for each patient. This was a double-blind study, meaning that the operation report was filed in a locked archive to keep the patient, staff, and clinical assessors blinded to the study group allocation. Blinding must not be broken during the follow-up unless required by any emergencies in the clinical management of the patient. Likewise, the patients must not be informed about the details of the operation. ClinicalTrials.gov, identification number NCT04179578.

Elective Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Leads to an Increase in Life Expectancy Over Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Patients: An Updated Markov Analysis.

The aim of this study was to perform an updated Markov analysis to determine the optimal management strategy for patients with an asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia (PEH): elective laparoscopic hernia repair (ELHR) versus watchful waiting (WW). Currently, it is recommended that patients with an asymptomatic PEH not undergo repair based on a 20-year-old Markov analysis. The current recommendation might lead to preventable hospitalizations for acute PEH-related complications and compromised survival. A Markov model with updated variables was used to compare life-years (L-Ys) gained with ELHR versus WW in patients with a PEH. One-way sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the analysis to alternative data inputs, while probabilistic sensitivity analysis quantified the level of confidence in the results in relation to the uncertainty across all model inputs. At age 40 to 90, ELHR led to greater life expectancy than WW, particularly in women. The gain in L-Ys (2.6) was greatest in a 40-year-old woman and diminished with increasing age. Sensitivity analysis showed that alternative values resulted in modest changes in the difference in L-Ys, but ELHR remained the preferred strategy. Probabilistic analysis showed that ELHR was the preferred strategy in 100% of 10,000 simulations for age 65, 98% for age 80, 90% for age 85, and 59% of simulations in 90-year-old women. This updated analysis showed that ELHR leads to an increase in L-Ys over WW in healthy patients aged 40 to 90 years with an asymptomatic PEH. In this new paradigm, all patients with a PEH, regardless of symptoms, should be referred for the consideration of elective repair to maximize their life expectancy.

A synopsis of the SAGES ADOPT course for foregut surgery and its positive impact on surgeons' confidence levels.

The Acquisition of Data for Outcomes and Procedure Transfer (ADOPT) program was established by SAGES to develop and expand individual surgeon's comfort with specific, complex operations using hands-on teaching and longitudinal mentoring. The 2022-2023 Foregut (Dominating the Hiatus) section of the course focused on hiatal hernia dissection and gastric fundoplication techniques. Our aim was to describe the experience of surgeons who participated in the course. The hands-on component occurred in March 2022 at the SAGES annual meeting. Each expert mentor was matched to two participants. The mentors guided the surgeons through steps of a laparoscopic paraesophageal (PEH) hernia repair and fundoplication using a cadaveric model. Afterwards, monthly group webinars occurred and participants could receive individual coaching from their assigned mentor for a year. Each participant was given a pre-course survey with 3 and 12-month follow-up questionnaires. The majority of the 16 participants were employed in non-academic settings (87.5%). Years in practice ranged from 1 to 26, and 69% completed a fellowship. 100% completed the pre-course survey, and 53.8% responded to the 12-month post-course survey. Participant-reported effectiveness in performing a PEH hernia repair with fundoplication increased from 37.5% pre-course to 85.7% by the conclusion of the course. Confidence levels for the six core steps of the operation also increased: pre-course only 56-75% were confident with each step, this improved to 100% in four out of six steps. 85.7% said the course has changed their practice. Since inception, the ADOPT program has aimed to provide expert instruction for practicing surgeons to learn new techniques or improve their confidence in performing operations. The data for the 2022 ADOPT Foregut course shows that 1year of participation made a positive impact on these surgeons' practices. This helps to fill in the learning gap that occurs after formal surgical training ends.

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The robotic approach offers improved visualization and maneuverability for surgeons. This systematic review aims to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair, specifically examining postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, and recurrence. A systematic review including thorough research through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane, was performed and only comparative studies were included. Studies concerning other types of hiatal hernias or children were excluded. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare overall postoperative complications, hospital stay, and operation time. Ten comparative studies, with 186,259 participants in total, were included in the meta-analysis, but unfortunately, not all of them reported all the outcomes under question. It appeared that there is no statistically significant difference between the conventional laparoscopic and the robotic-assisted approach, regarding the overall postoperative complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-1.11), the mean operation time (t = 1.41; 95% CI, -0.15-0.52; p = 0.22), and the hospital length of stay (t = -1.54; degree of freedom = 8; 95% CI, -0.53-0.11; p = 0.16). Only two studies reported evidence concerning the recurrence rates. Overall, the robotic-assisted method did not demonstrate superiority over conventional laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair in terms of postoperative complications, operation time, or hospital stay. However, some studies focused on cost and patient characteristics of each group. Further comparative and randomized control studies with longer follow-up periods are needed for more accurate conclusions on short- and long-term outcomes.

Response to: Comment on "Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: to Mesh or Not to Mesh".

Response to: Comment on "Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: to Mesh or Not to Mesh".

Comment on "Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: to Mesh or Not to Mesh".

Comment on "Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: to Mesh or Not to Mesh".

Trends in outcomes of 862 giant hiatus hernia repairs over 30 years

PurposeLaparoscopic giant hiatus hernia repair is technically difficult with ongoing debate regarding the most effective surgical technique. Repair of small hernia has been well described but data for giant hernia is variable. This study evaluated trends in outcomes of laparoscopic non-mesh repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) over 30 years.MethodsRetrospective analysis of a single-surgeon prospective database. Laparoscopic non-mesh repairs for giant PEH between 1991 and 2021 included. Three-hundred-sixty-degree fundoplication was performed routinely, evolving into “composite repair” (esophagopexy and cardiopexy to the right crus). Cases were chronologically divided into tertiles based on operation date (Group 1, 1991–2002; Group 2, 2003–2012; Group 3, 2012–2021) with trends in casemix, operative factors and outcomes evaluated. Hernia recurrence was plotted using weighted moving average and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.Results862 giant PEH repairs met selection criteria. There was an increasing proportion of “composite repair” after the first decade (Group 1, 2.7%; Group 2, 81.9%; Group 3, 100%; p < 0.001). There were less anatomical hernia recurrence (Group 1, 36.6%; Group 2, 22.9%; Group 3, 22.7%; p < 0.001) and symptomatic recurrence (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 21.9%; Group 3, 7%; p < 0.001) over time. The incidence of anatomical recurrence declined over time, decreasing from 30.8% and plateauing below 17.6% near the study’s end. Median followup (months) in the first decade was higher but followup between the latter two decades comparable (Group 1, 49 [IQR 20, 81]; Group 2, 30 [IQR 15, 65]; Group 3, 24 [14, 56]; p < 0.001). There were 10 (1.2%) Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III complications including two perioperative deaths (0.2%).ConclusionHernia recurrence rates decreased with increasing case volume. This coincided with the increasing adoption of “composite repair”, supporting the possible improvement in recurrence rates with this approach.

A 13-year experience with biologic and biosynthetic absorbable mesh reinforced laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Mesh reinforced cruroplasty during laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair remains controversial due to wide variation in surgical technique and mesh composition. This study aims to review outcomes and rates of recurrence following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) with mesh reinforced cruroplasty utilizing absorbable mesh at a single institution. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent LPEHR with mesh was performed. Medical records were reviewed for patient reported, radiographic or endoscopic evidence of recurrence, defined as > 2cm of vertical intrathoracic stomach. If no studies were available for review, patients were considered to have no recurrence. Outcomes and mesh-related complications were also reviewed. Between 10/2008 and 9/2021, 473 patients underwent LPEHR with absorbable mesh; 1.3% type 2 hernias, 86.0% type 3 hernias, 12.7% type 4 hernias. Three types of mesh were used: initially biologic mesh (n = 83), then heavyweight synthetic bioabsorbable mesh (n = 261), and finally lightweight synthetic bioabsorbable mesh (n = 111). There were no significant differences in age, ASA, BMI, gender, smoking status, chronic steroid use, preoperative acid suppression, hernia type, or recurrent hernia between groups. There were no significant differences in 30-day postoperative outcomes. Reflux Symptom Index, GERD-HRQL, and Dysphagia Scores at 1- and 2-year postoperative timepoints were not significantly different. The overall recurrence rate was 16.7%, with no significant differences in recurrence rates between biologic, heavyweight or lightweight biosynthetic absorbable mesh through 2 years after surgery. A shorter median time to recurrence (10months, p = 0.016) was seen in the lightweight group. LPEHR with absorbable mesh reinforced cruroplasty is feasible and safe, with equivalent patient-reported outcomes, including dysphagia, up to 2-years postop regardless of mesh choice. No significant differences in recurrence rates between biologic, heavyweight, or lightweight synthetic bioabsorbable mesh were seen up to 2 years after LPEHR.

The impact of frailty on outcomes following laparoscopic repair of 'giant' paraesophageal hernias.

Frailty is a measure of physiologic reserve and correlates with surgical outcomes in the elderly. Patients who present with giant paraesophageal hernias (PEH) are typically older than 65. We defined 'giant' as a PEH with 50% or more of the stomach in the chest. We hypothesized that frailty correlates with 30-day complications, length of stay, and discharge destination following laparoscopic giant PEH repair. Patients older than 65 to undergo primary laparoscopic repair of a giant PEH at a single academic medical center between 2015 and 2022 were included. Hernia size was determined by preoperative imaging. Frailty was assessed clinically prior to surgery using the modified Frailty Index (mFI), an 11-item instrument that counts clinical deficits associated with frailty. A score ≥ 3 was considered frail. A major complication was a Clavien grade IIIB or higher. Of the 162 patients included in the study, mean age was 74.4 ± 7.2, and 66% of patients were female (n = 128). The mFI was ≥ 3 in 37 patients (22.8%). Frail patients were older (78 ± 7.9 vs. 73 ± 6.6years, p = 0.02). There was no difference in overall complication rate (40.5% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.22) or major complication rate (8.1% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.20) between frail and non-frail patients. Functionally impaired patients (METS < 4) were more likely to develop a major complication (17.9% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.01). Average length of stay was 2.4days, and frail patients experienced a longer mean hospital stay (2.5 ± 0.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.8, p = 0.03). Frail patients were more likely to be discharged to a destination other than home. Increased frailty as assessed by the mFI is correlated with length of stay and discharge destination following laparoscopic repair of giant PEH in patients > 65. Complication rates were comparable for both frail and non-frail cohorts.

Economic evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Robotic approach in paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair may improve outcomes over laparoscopic approach, though at additional cost. This study aimed to compare cost-effectiveness of robotic and laparoscopic PEH repair. A decision tree was created analyzing cost-effectiveness of robotic and laparoscopic PEH repair. Costs were obtained from 2021 Medicare data and were accumulated within 60months after surgery. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Branch-point probabilities and costs of robotic surgery consumables were obtained from published literature. The primary outcome of interest was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. A secondary analysis including attributable capital and maintenance costs of robotic surgery was conducted as well. Laparoscopic repair yielded 3.660 QALYs at $35,843.82. Robotic repair yielded 3.661 QALYs at $36,342.57, with an ICER of $779,488.62/QALY. Robotic repair was favored when rates of openconversion and symptom recurrence were low, or with reduced cost of robotic instruments. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis favored laparoscopic repair in 100% of simulations. When accounting for costs of robotic technology, robotic approach was preferred only in unrealistic clinical scenarios. Laparoscopic repair is likely more cost-effective for most institutions, though results were relatively similar. With experienced surgeons who surpass the initial learning curve, robotic surgery may improve outcomes enough to be cost-effective, but only when excluding capital and maintenance fees.

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia (PEH) Repair, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, and Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) in a Patient with Achalasia After Sleeve Gastrectomy.

GERD and Achalasia are two known complications after sleeve gastrectomy. Treatment towards each of these complications varies and requires a tailored approach. We present a 55-year-old female with class II obesity and a previous history of sleeve gastrectomy who developed significant gastroesophageal reflux disease refractory to medical management. After a covid infection in fall of 2020, she began to report new symptoms of dysphagia that progressed from solids to liquids. She underwent extensive workup including upper endoscopy, upper GI barium swallow, manometry, pH impedence, and EndoFlip leading to a diagnosis of Achalasia type II as well as a paraesophageal hernia. Given these findings, she underwent a combined paraesophageal hernia repair with conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric diversion and an intra-operative peroral endoscopic myotomy. Intraoperatively, she was noted to have significant lower abdominal adhesions leading to performing the Roux-en-Y reconstruction through a supramesocolic defect in a retrocolic fashion. While the development of heartburn and achalasia after sleeve gastrectomy is rare, it requires interventions dedicated towards each etiology. This case demonstrates treatment of both these symptoms is feasible in a single operation.

A Narrative Review on Treatment of Giant Hiatal Hernia.

Background: The current gold standard of treatment for giant hiatal hernias (GHHs) is laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was performed as a less invasive procedure for paraesophageal hernias more than 25 years ago. Its viability and safety have almost all been shown. Materials and Methods: A review of recent and current studies' literature was done. Prospective randomized trials, systematic reviews, clinical reviews, and original articles were all investigated. The data were gathered in the form of a narrative evaluation. We examine the state of laparoscopic GHH repair today and outline the GHH management strategy. Results: In this review, we clear up misunderstandings of GHH and address bad habits that may have contributed to poor results, and we have consequently performed a methodical evaluation of GHH. First, we address subcategorizing GHH and provide criteria to define them. The preoperative workup strategies are then discussed, with a focus on any pertinent and frequent atypical symptoms, indications for surgery, timing of surgery, and the importance of surgery. The approach to the techniques and the logic behind surgery are then presented along with some important dissection techniques. Finally, we debate the role of mesh reinforcement and evaluate the data in terms of recurrence, reoperation rate, complications, and delayed stomach emptying. Finally, we suggest a justification for common postoperative investigations. Conclusions: Surgery is the only effective treatment for GHH at the moment. If the right operational therapy principles are applied, this is generally successful. There is a growing interest in laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair as a result of the introduction of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Today's less invasive procedures provide a better therapeutic choice with a lower risk.

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair With Nissen Fundoplication in a Patient With Ancient Schwannoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction.

Schwannomas are mostly benign tumors that originate from Schwann cells and are rarely seen in the gastrointestinal tract. Our patient is a 65-year-old female who was found to have a 1.5cm lesion at the gastroesophageal junction, which was clipped and excised on endoscopy. Histologic examination demonstrated an ancient schwannoma. Two years afterward, she presented to our clinic for a large type III paraesophageal hernia. We took her to the operating room for a laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and Nissen fundoplication. We performed an upper endoscopy during the case and found no recurrence of the ancient schwannoma. The case progressed well without complications. She was discharged on postoperative day 1 after tolerating a pureed diet and reported no issues in follow-up. In summary, we demonstrate a successful surgical outcome in a patient who had undergone resection of this rare tumor 2 years prior to her surgery.

Comparison of laparoscopic vs. robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review.

In both clinical practice and residency training, the use of robotic platforms in surgery is becoming more common. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. The PRISMA statement guidelines were used to perform this systematic review. We conducted a database search which included Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. There were 384 articles discovered in the initial search using various keywords. From those 384 articles, after duplicates were removed and publications were eliminated based on eligibility criteria, 7 publications were then chosen for analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Narrative synthesis of results has been provided. When compared to standard laparoscopic approaches, robotic surgery for large PEHs may offer benefits in terms of decreased conversion rate and shorter hospital stay. Some studies found a decrease in need for esophageal lengthening procedures and fewer long-term recurrences. The perioperative complication rate is similar between the two techniques in most studies; however, one large study of nearly 170,000 patients in the early years of robotics adoption demonstrated a higher rate of esophageal perforation and respiratory failure in the robotic group (2.2% increase in absolute risk). Cost is another disadvantage of robotic repair when compared to laparoscopic repair. Our study is limited by the non-randomized and retrospective nature of the studies. More studies into recurrence rates and long-term complications are needed to determine the efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic PEHs repair.

The Impact of Body Mass Index on Recurrence Rates Following Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

Introduction: Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) has a reported recurrence rate of nearly 50%. While the etiology of these recurrences is multifactorial, obesity likely plays a role. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on hiatal hernia recurrence following LPEHR. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected foregut surgical database identified patients who underwent a primary standard elective LPEHR between 2006 and 2012 and objective follow up &gt;12 months after surgery. Hernia recurrence was defined as &gt;2 cm axial displacement of fundoplication/stomach above the diaphragm on barium swallow/endoscopy. Data was analyzed based on BMI. Results: Of 236/350 (67%) who had long term-objective follow-up (mean 34 months), the overall recurrence rate was 24%. Recurrence rates were lower for patients with normal BMI (10.8% vs 26.1%, P &lt; .05). Recurrence rates were similar across elevated BMI groups (overweight = 31%, class I = 24%, class II = 24%, class III = 18%, P = NS). The odds of recurrence was 2.92 (95% CI: 0.99-8.64) greater for patients with BMI &gt; 25 than for normal weight individuals. There was no difference in recurrence rates based BMI &lt;or&gt;35. Conclusions: Patients with a normal BMI experience significantly lower recurrence rates following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. The increased risk appears to be similar across BMI categories, including individuals who do not meet criteria for formal weight loss surgery. Therefore, a BMI greater than 35 alone is not a reliable demarcation of recurrence risk. Efforts to achieve normal weight pre-operatively are recommended to minimize recurrences.