Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Group Research Articles

Robotic-Assisted Nissen Fundoplication in Pediatric Patients: A Matched Cohort Study.

Nissen Fundoplication (NF) is a frequently performed procedure in children. Robotic-assisted Nissen Fundoplication (RNF), with the utilization of the Senhance® Surgical System (SSS®) (Asensus Surgical® Inc., Durham, NC, USA) featuring 3 mm instruments, aims to improve precision and safety in pediatric surgery. This matched cohort study assesses the safety and feasibility of RNF in children using the SSS®, comparing it with Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF). Twenty children underwent RNF with the SSS® between 2020 to 2023 and were 1:1 matched with twenty LNF cases retrospectively selected from 2014 to 2023. Both groups were similar regarding male/female ratio, age, and weight. Two of the twenty RNF cases (10%) experienced intraoperative complications, whereas three in the LNF group of whom two required reinterventions. The observed percentage of postoperative complications was 5% in the RNF group compared to 15% in the LNF group (p = 0.625). The operative times in the RNF group significantly dropped towards the second study period (p = 0.024). Utilizing SSS® for NF procedures in children is safe and feasible. Observational results may tentatively suggest that growing experiences and continued development will lead to better outcomes based on more accurate and safe surgery for children.

Comparison of surgical payer costs and implication on the healthcare expenses between laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in a large healthcare system

IntroductionMagnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising antireflux surgical treatment. The cost associated with the device may be perceived as a drawback by payers, which may limit the adoption of this technique. There are limited data regarding the cost of MSA in the management of reflux disease. The aims of the study were to report the clinical outcome and quality of life measures in patients after MSA and to compare the pharmaceutical and procedure payer costs and the disease-related and overall expense of MSA compared to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) from a payer perspective.Methods and proceduresThis prospective observational study was performed in conjunction with the region’s largest health insurance company. Data were collected on patients who underwent MSA over a 2-year period beginning in September 2015 at the study network hospitals. The LNF comparison group was procured from members’ claims data of the payer. Inclusion was predicated by patients having continuous coverage during study period. The total procedural reimbursement and the disease-related and overall medical claims submitted up to 12 months prior to surgery and up to 12 months following surgery were obtained. The payer reimbursement data are presented as allowed cost per member per month (PMPM). These values were then compared between groups.ResultsThere were 195 patients who underwent MSA and 1131 that had LNF. MSA results in comparable symptom control, PPI elimination rate, and quality of life measures compared to values reported for LNF in the literature. The median (IQR) reimbursement of surgery was $13,522 (13,195–14,439) for those who underwent MSA and $13,388 (9951–16,261) for patients with LNF, p = 0.02. In patients who underwent MSA, the median reimbursement related to the upper gastrointestinal disease was $ 305 PMPM, at 12 months prior to surgery and $ 104 at 12 months after surgery, representing 66% decrease in cost. These values were $ 233 PMPM and $126 PMPM for patients who underwent LNF, representing a 46% decrease (p = 0.0001). At 12 months following surgery, the reimbursement for overall medical expenses had decreased by 10.7% in the MSA group and 1.4% in the LNF group when compared to the preoperative baseline reimbursement. The reimbursement for PPI use after surgery showed a 95% decrease in the MSA group and 90% among LNF group when compared to the preoperative baseline (p = 0.10).ConclusionWhen compared with LNF, MSA results in a reduction of disease-related expenses for the payer in the year following surgery. While MSA is associated with a higher procedural payer cost compared to LNF, payer costs may offset due to reduction in the expenses after surgery.

The impact of the robotic platform on assistant variability in complex gastrointestinal surgery

BackgroundNissen fundoplication is considered an advanced minimally invasive procedure whether performed laparoscopically or robotically. In laparoscopic surgery, it is evident that assistant skill level impacts operative times. However, the robotic platform allows improved surgeon autonomy. We aimed to determine the impact of assistant training level on operative times in robotic Nissen fundoplication (RNF) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). MethodsA prospectively maintained Nissen database (2011-2016) from a single academic institution was utilized to collect patient characteristics, operative times, length of stay, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, readmission rate, and assistant training level. Assistants were either postgraduate year-3 surgery residents defined as junior-level assistants or a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellow defined as senior-level assistants. ResultsThere were 105 patients included in our analyses. When comparing postgraduate year-3 residents to MIS fellows performing LNF, the median operative time was significantly decreased when senior-level assistants were present in the LNF group, 85 (75-103) versus 129 (74-269) min, P = 0.02. In comparison, median operative times in the RNF group were independent of the assistant's level of training, 154 (71-300) versus 158 (101-215) min, P = 0.34. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the junior- and senior-level assistant cohorts for estimated blood loss, length of stay, postoperative complications, and 30-d readmission rates in either the LNF or RNF group. ConclusionsAssistant training level impacted operative time for LNF but not RNF. These differences are most likely attributed to increased autonomy of the operating surgeon afforded by the robotic platform reducing assistant variability.

Same-day discharge in benign esophageal surgery: a prospective cohort study

Day-case esophageal surgery has been demonstrated to be safe in small prospective cohorts and only for laparoscopic fundoplication. The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility and safety of a large series of esophageal day-case surgeries, including laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF), Zenker diverticulectomy (ZD), and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and to compare the outcomes among three procedures.This was a prospective, observational study of selected patients who underwent day-case LNF, ZD, and LHM between 2003 and 2013. Postoperative outcomes, the patients' satisfaction, and functional results were evaluated with dedicated scores and compared.Of the 427 patients who underwent surgery for those indications during the study period, 168 (39.3%) eligible patients underwent day-case procedures (134 LNF, 14 LHM, and 20 ZD). The overnight unplanned admission rate was 16.2% and was similar among the groups (P = 0.681). Ten patients were readmitted during the first postoperative week because of dysphagia (n = 6, all in the LNF group), flu-like syndrome (n = 1), and secondary perforation (n = 3, all in the LHM group). The unplanned seven-day readmission rate was significantly higher in the LHM group than in the ZD and LNF groups (P = 0.042). The 30-day rates of unplanned readmission and consultation were 8.9% (P = 0.300) and 4.8%, respectively. At follow-up, 87.5% of the patients were satisfied with day-case treatment, and the functional results were good for 81.4% of the patients.Day-case esophageal surgery is feasible for LNF and seems to be feasible for ZD. Safety criteria have not yet been met for LHM, requiring further adaptations.

Nissen fundoplication vs proton pump inhibitors for laryngopharyngeal reflux based on pH-monitoring and symptom-scale.

AIMTo compare the outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and type I hiatal hernia diagnosed by oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and symptom-scale assessment.METHODSFrom February 2014 to January 2015, 70 patients who were diagnosed with LPR and type I hiatal hernia and referred for symptomatic assessment, oropharyngeal pH-monitoring, manometry, and gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled in this study. All of the patients met the inclusion criteria. All of the patients underwent LNF or PPIs administration, and completed a 2-year follow-up. Patients’ baseline characteristics and primary outcome measures, including comprehensive and single symptoms of LPR, PPIs independence, and satisfaction, and postoperative complications were assessed. The outcomes of LNF and PPIs therapy were analyzed and compared.RESULTSThere were 31 patients in the LNF group and 39 patients in the PPI group. Fifty-three patients (25 in the LNF group and 28 in the PPI group) completed reviews and follow-up. Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring parameters were all abnormal with high acid exposure, a large amount of reflux, and a high Ryan score, associated reflux symptom index (RSI) score. There was a significant improvement in the RSI and LPR symptom scores after the 2-year follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05), as well as typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Improvement in the RSI (P < 0.005) and symptom scores of cough (P = 0.032), mucus (P = 0.011), and throat clearing (P = 0.022) was significantly superior in the LNF group to that in the PPI group. After LNF and PPIs therapy, 13 and 53 patients achieved independence from PPIs therapy (LNF: 44.0% vs PPI: 7.14%, P < 0.001) during follow-up, respectively. Patients in the LNF group were more satisfied with their quality of life than those in the PPI group (LNF: 62.49 ± 28.68 vs PPI: 44.36 ± 32.77, P = 0.004). Body mass index was significantly lower in the LNF group than in the PPI group (LNF: 22.2 ± 3.1 kg/m2 vs PPI: 25.1 ± 2.9 kg/m2, P = 0.001).CONCLUSIONDiagnosis of LPR should be assessed with oropharyngeal pH-monitoring, manometry, and the symptom-scale. LNF achieves better improvement than PPIs for LPR with type I hiatal hernia.

Significance of Nissen fundoplication after endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus.

HALO radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proven as safe and efficient in eradication of both non- and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). Definitive post-RFA treatment is yet to be determined. RFA was performed in 56 patients with BE, 38 with intestinal metaplasia (IM) and 18 with low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and repeated in case of residual BE. Length of the BE was classified according to C&M criteria. Follow-up included regular upper GI endoscopies with biopsies 6months, 1 and 2years after the complete resolution of BE. Patients were divided into two groups regarding post-RFA treatment: those maintaining proton pump inhibitors (PPI) daily and those submitted to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) at least 3months after BE eradication or synchronous with RFA. There were no perforations or strictures related to RFA. Complete endoscopic resolution of BE was observed in 83.92% patients (86.84% IM and 77.77% LGD), in 25 that maintained PPI and 22 in whom LNF was done. In PPI group, 2-year follow-up revealed BE recurrence in biopsy samples in 20% of patients, while in LNF group 9.1% of patients had recurrent IM. In overall sample of patients, no difference was noted regarding the influence of post-RFA treatment (p<0.423). LNF proved superiority over PPI treatment in patients with long-segment BE (cutoff C>4cm, p<0.021). HALO RFA is a safe procedure, with high rate of success in complete eradication of BE in symptomatic GERD patients. LNF provides good protection for neosquamous epithelium and in selected group of patients could be offered as a first line of treatment after HALO RFA.

Outcome of Stretta radiofrequency and fundoplication for GERD-related severe asthmatic symptoms.

This study aimed to investigate the outcome of treatment with Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). A total of 137 gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with severe asthmatic symptoms who responded inadequately to medical treatment for asthma were investigated. The patients were followed up 1 year and 5 years after SRF (n = 82) or LNF (n = 55) treatment. A questionnaire covering 29 related symptoms and medication use was employed. Digestive, respiratory, and ear-nose-throat (ENT) symptom scores significantly decreased after antireflux treatment. Symptom scores respectively changed from 17.2 ± 10.1, 31.9 ± 6.6, and 21.1 ± 11.8 to 5.0 ± 6.2, 11.5 ± 10.2, and 6.3 ± 6.8 at 1 year and to 5.6 ± 6.5, 13.1 ± 10.1, and 7.8 ± 7.2 at 5 years (P < 0.001). The outcome of LNF was significantly better than that of SRF in terms of digestive (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), respiratory (P = 0.006, P = 0.001), and ENT symptoms (P = 0.006, P = 0.003) at both 1 year and 5 years. SRF and LNF were both effective against the digestive symptoms of GERD as well as GERD-related severe asthmatic and ENT symptoms, with better outcomes exhibited by the LNF group. Severe asthmatic symptoms and GERD were closely associated, and this finding warrants further study.

Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients

The efficacy and safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with the LINX device (Torax Medical) has been reported in several short-and long-term studies, rivaling historic results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF), but with fewer side effects. However, there have been no studies comparing patients with similar disease to validate these results. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing MSA and LNF from June 2010 to June 2013. Patients were matched using propensity scores incorporating multiple preoperative variables. Outcomes were measured by GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores, proton-pump inhibitor use, satisfaction, and complications. One hundred and seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria, 62 MSA and 117 LNF. Propensity score matching identified 50 patients in both groups using the "best-fit" model with a caliper of 0.5 SD. At 1 year after surgery, both groups had similar GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores (4.2 MSA and 4.3 LNF; p = 0.897) and proton-pump inhibitor use (17% of MSA and 8.5% of LNF; p = 0.355). Although there was no difference in the number of patients reporting mild gas and bloating (27.6% MSA and 27.6% LNF; p = 1.000), there were no patients with severe gas and bloating in the MSA group compared with 10.6% in the LNF group (p = 0.022). More LNF patients were unable to belch (8.5% of MSA and 25.5% of LNF; p = 0.028) or vomit (4.3% of MSA and 21.3% of LNF; p = 0.004). The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was similar between the groups (46.8% MSA and 44.7% LNF; p = 0.766). Analogous GERD patients had similar control of reflux symptoms after both MSA and LNF. The inabilities to belch and vomit were significantly fewer with MSA, along with a significantly lower incidence of severe gas-bloat symptoms. These results support the use of MSA as first-line therapy in patients with mild to moderate GERD.

Aerosolized intraperitoneal local anesthetic for laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge following laparoscopy. Aerosolized intraperitoneal local anesthetic (AILA) is a novel method to deliver local anesthetic. The aim was to evaluate aerosolized ropivacaine in pain management following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and cholecystectomy (LC). This prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial enrolled consecutive patients undergoing LNF and LC. The treatment group (TG) received intraperitoneal ropivacaine (5 mL 1 % Naropin(®)) at CO2 insufflation via the AeroSurge(®) aerosolizer device through the camera port. The control group (CG) received 5 mL of saline in the same manner. Postoperative shoulder tip pain at rest 6 h postoperatively was the primary study endpoint, with secondary endpoints of shoulder and abdominal pain within the first 24 h, recovery room stay, hospital stay, and postoperative analgesia use. Pain scores were collected using the Verbal Rating Score. Eighty-seven patients were included in the final analysis (TG n = 40, CG n = 47). There was no significant difference between CG and TG at the primary endpoint. In the LC group, AILA significantly reduced shoulder tip pain at rest at 10 (p = 0.030) and 30 min (p = 0.040) and shoulder tip pain on movement at 10 (p = 0.030) and 30 min (p = 0.037). In the LNF group, AILA significantly reduced postoperative abdominal pain at rest at 6 h (p = 0.009). AILA reduced overall incidence of shoulder tip pain in the LC group (11.8 vs. 57.9 %, p = 0.004). This study did not demonstrate a significant difference between TG and CG in the primary endpoint, pain at 6 h postoperatively.

Inflammatory response after open and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in children: a randomized study

It is assumed that laparoscopic surgery generally induces less inflammatory responses than open surgery. Since few studies have compared immune responses after laparoscopic and open surgery in children, we examined inflammatory markers in children randomized to open (ONF) or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). Blood samples were collected prior to surgery (D0), and on postoperative day 1 (D1) and day 2 (D2). Inflammatory markers were measured using a multiplex antibody bead kit. The postoperative levels of inflammatory markers were statistically analyzed using a linear mixed model. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Twenty-nine patients randomized to ONF or LNF were included. Median age was 3.1 years (range 1.0-14.2) in the ONF group and 4.0 years (range 0.2-14.2) in the LNF group. Plasma levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10 were significantly higher in the ONF group than in the LNF group postoperatively (P = 0.04). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the levels of pro-inflammatory markers tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, white blood cell count, or C-reactive protein. We did not find that laparoscopy induced a substantially less inflammatory response than laparotomy in children undergoing fundoplication.

Conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparison of postoperative acid reflux parameters

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is a technically demanding surgical procedure designed to cure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It represents an alternative to life-long medical therapy and the only recommended treatment modality to overcome refractoriness to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The recent development of robotic systems prompted evaluation of their use in antireflux surgery. Between 1997 and 2000, in a PPI-responsive series we found postoperative normalization of esophageal acid exposure time (EAET) in most but not all cases. Between 2007 and 2009, in a PPI-refractory series we found postoperative normalization of EAET in all cases. We decided to analyze retrospectively our prospectively collected data to evaluate whether differences other than the conventional or robot-assisted technique could justify postoperative differences in acid reflux parameters. Baseline demographic, endoscopic, and manometric parameters were compared between the two series of patients, as well as postoperative manometric and acid reflux parameters. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic, endoscopic, and manometric characteristics between the two groups of patients. The median lower esophageal sphincter tone increased significantly, and the median EAET decreased significantly after conventional as well as after robot-assisted LNF. The median postoperative EAET was significantly lower in the robot-assisted (0.2%) than in the conventional LNF group (1%; P=0.001). Abnormal EAET values were found in 6 of 44 (14%) and in 0 of 44 cases after conventional and robot-assisted LNF, respectively (P=0.026). Robot-assisted LNF provided a significant gain in postoperative acid reflux parameters compared with the conventional technique. In a challenging clinical setting, such as PPI-refractoriness, in which the efficacy of endoscopic or pharmacological treatment modalities is only moderate, even a small therapeutic gain can be clinically relevant. In centers where robot-assisted LNF is available, it should be preferred to conventional LNF in PPI-refractory GERD.

A meta‐analysis comparing laparoscopic partial versus Nissen fundoplication

For proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, partial fundoplication is considered as effective as Nissen, but with fewer side effects. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effect of laparoscopic partial fundoplication (LPF) with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). Extensive medical literature searches of the PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were performed up to April 2010 for all randomized clinical trials that compared LPF versus LNF. The effect variables analysed were the incidence of post-operative dysphagia, heartburn, inability to belch, outcome or satisfaction and Visick score. Meta-analyses were carried out using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval. Thirteen randomized trials were considered suitable for the meta-analysis. A total of 1374 patients underwent LPF or LNF. There was a significant reduction of the incidence of post-operative dysphagia (OR = 0.44, P < 0.0001) and inability to belch (OR = 0.41, P < 0.005) for the LPF compared to that of the LNF group. Compared with LPF, LNF resulted in a significant reduction of the incidence of post-operative heartburn (OR = 1.94, P < 0.01). The outcome or satisfaction of patients and Visick I and II scores were comparable between the two groups. Both LPF and LNF are effective for the treatment of proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. LPF enables a decreased post-operative dysphagia and gas-related side effects, while LNF is more successful in controlling reflux symptoms, particularly heartburn, than LPF. A balance should be found between anti-reflux and side effects.

Comparison of Transesophageal Endoscopic Plication (TEP) with Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF) in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Reflux Disease

Transesophageal endoscopic plication (TEP) is a novel endotherapeutic approach in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This non-randomized prospective study compares TEP with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). Twenty-four consecutive patients treated with LNF, and 27 managed by TEP were studied. Symptom severity scores, endoscopy, 24 h esophageal pH and esophageal manometry and quality-of-life assessments were obtained pre- and posttreatment. In the LNF group the mean age was 36 yr (17-68) compared with 39 yr (22-62) in the TEP group. Symptom scoring, acid regurgitation score, reduction in the requirements of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and quality of life remained significantly improved in both groups at a median of 1 yr [10-18 months] follow-up post procedure. However, the improvement was significantly better in symptom score (p= 0.0383) and the control of acid reflux in the LNF group (p= 0.0007). Post-procedure dysphagia was more common in the LNF group. Both techniques improved symptom score, acid regurgitation, quality of life, and reduced the requirements for PPIs. The control of heartburn and acid reflux was better for LNF. TEP, like LNF, is a safe and effective method of management of symptomatic GERD but further developments are necessary to ensure control of esophageal acid reflux.

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication compared with proton-pump inhibitors for treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux

Both laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are established in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The aim of this study was to compare these two treatments in a randomized clinical trial. Between July 1997 and August 2001, 340 patients with a history of GORD for at least 6 months were investigated by endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring and manometry. Of these, 217 were randomized, 109 to LNF and 108 to PPI therapy. The two groups were well matched for age, sex, weight and severity of reflux. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring and manometry were performed 3 months after treatment, and quality of life was assessed in both groups using the Psychological General Well-being Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale at 3 and 12 months after treatment. At 3 months there was an improvement in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure from 6.3 to 17.2 mmHg in the LNF group but no change in the PPI group (8.1 and 7.9 mmHg before and after treatment respectively) (P < 0.001). The mean DeMeester acid exposure score improved from 42.7 to 8.6 (P < 0.001) in the LNF group and from 36.9 to 17.7 in the PPI group (P < 0.001). The mean gastrointestinal symptom and general well-being scores improved from 31.7 and 95.4 respectively before treatment to 37.0 and 106.2 at 12 months after LNF, compared with changes from 34.3 and 98.5 to 35.0 and 100.4 respectively in the PPI group. The differences in both of these scores were significant between the two groups at 12 months (P = 0.003). LNF leads to significantly less acid exposure of the lower oesophagus at 3 months and significantly greater improvements in both gastrointestinal and general well-being after 12 months compared with PPI treatment.

The economics of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

Background & Aims: A major impetus for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is its purported cost savings compared with medical therapy, but few studies have examined these economic outcomes. The aim was to analyze health care costs and use among a cohort of patients undergoing LNF and compare them with patients with medically treated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: Comparison of health care use and direct costs from the third-party payer perspective using 13 United HealthCare Plans. Sixty-one patients who underwent LNF from January 1994 to June 1998 and 178 matched controls were used for this study. Outcome variables included the cost of hospital and outpatient visits, hospitalizations, related endoscopic procedures, and pharmacy claims for proton pump inhibitors, H 2 receptor antagonists, and prokinetics. Cost of LNF or index esophagogastroduodenoscopy was not included. Results: Sixty-one LNF patients and 178 controls were studied. No differences were seen for the costs of office visits and hospital admissions or the number of gastrointestinal procedures. LNF patients had significantly lower gastrointestinal medication costs. Median total health care costs were significantly lower in the LNF group but mean total costs were not different. This was attributable to $201,000 in costs for managing complications in one patient that skewed total health care cost in the LNF group. Conclusions: For the 12 months after surgery, LNF reduced costs for gastrointestinal medications but not total costs for the cohort. LNF cost is impacted greatly by the cost of associated complications. Based on these data, LNF does not appear to significantly reduce the direct cost of health care for GERD patients on a population basis.

The influence of surgical technique on clinical outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

During laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF), it is unclear whether the short gastric vessels (SGV) should be divided, the crura reapproximated, or the wrap sutured to the crus. Since first performing LNF, we have consistently utilized a <2.5-cm wrap performed over a >50 Fr dilator. Other technical details have varied, and these are reviewed in terms of early clinical outcome. Of 105 consecutive patients undergoing LNF, two were converted to open operation (2%). In the remaining 103 patients with >/=3-month follow-up (mean 17 months), the initial 46 (group 1; 45%, mean age +/- SEM = 47 +/- 2 years) had selective division of the SGV, crural closure, and wrap fixation. In this group, 32 patients (70%) underwent SGV division, 30 patients (65%) had crural closure (10 anteriorly/20 posteriorly), and 14 patients (30%) had the wrap sutured to the crus. During the subsequent 57 LNFs (group 2; 55%, 47 +/- 2 years), all patients underwent SGV division, posterior crural closure, and suture of the wrap to the crus. Clinical outcome at >/=3 months was compared between the two groups. The frequencies of mild reflux symptoms, meteorism, and persistent dysphagia were similar in the two groups. However, the incidences of slippage of the wrap into the chest and the need for secondary intervention (esophageal dilatation and/or laparoscopic reoperation) decreased significantly from 15% and 13% of patients in group 1, respectively, to no occurrences in group II. Chi-square analyses revealed that combinations of these technical variables were significantly related to the improved outcome in group II. Based on these data demonstrating improved clinical outcome, we recommend routine division of the SGV, posterior closure of the crura, and fixation of the wrap to the crus during LNF.