Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Research Articles

The clinical significance of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection

Objectives: This study aims to explore the clinical significance of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) and evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of this technique to predict the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs). Methods: The clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, lymph node findings and perioperative complications of 16 rectal cancer patients who underwent SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic LLND in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College during April 2017 and October 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The patients did not receive preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and presented with LPLNs but without LPLN enlargement (MRI showed the maximum short axes of the LPLNs were ≥5 mm and <10 mm at first visit). Results: All 16 patients were successfully performed SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation in laparoscopic LLND. Three patients underwent bilateral LLND and 13 patients underwent unilateral LLND. The lateral pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were clearly fluorescent before dissection in 14 patients and the detection rate of SLNs for these patients was 87.5%. Lateral pelvic SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 2 patients and negative results were found in 12 patients by frozen pathological examinations. Among the 14 patients in whom lateral pelvic SLNs were detected, the dissected lateral pelvic non-SLNs were all negative. All dissected LPLNs were negative in two patients without fluorescent lateral pelvic SLNs. The specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy was 85.7%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: This study indicates that lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation shows promise as a safe and feasible procedure with good accuracy. This technique may replace preventive LLND for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.

Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Could Harvest More Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes over Laparoscopic Approach for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) is a technically demanding procedure. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic LPNDs. This multi-institutional retrospective study included 108 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision with LPND for locally advanced rectal cancer. There were 74 patients in the laparoscopic and 34 in the robotic groups. The median operation time was longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (353 vs. 275 min, p < 0.001). No patients underwent conversion to open surgery in either group. Pathological LPN metastases were observed in 24 and 8 patients in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.347). Although the number of harvested mesorectal lymph nodes was similar (15.5 vs. 15.0, p = 0.968), the number of harvested LPNs was higher in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (7.0 vs. 5.0, p = 0.004). Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were similar (robotic vs. laparoscopic, 35.3% and 7 days vs. 37.8% and 7 days, respectively). Both laparoscopic and robotic LPND are safe and feasible for locally advanced rectal cancers, but robotic LPND showed more harvested lateral lymph node than laparoscopic LPND.

Long-term outcomes of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for clinical stageII/III middle-lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

We previously reported that indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI)-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) was able to increase the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes without impairing functional preservation. However, the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND have not been evaluated. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND to conventional laparoscopic LPLND without ICG-FI. This was a retrospective, multi-institutional study with propensity score matching. The study population included consecutive patients with middle-low rectal cancer (clinical stageII to III) who underwent laparoscopic LPLND between January 2013 and February 2018. The main evaluation items in this study were the 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence rate, and lateral local recurrence (LLR) rate. A total of 172 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic LPLND were included in this study. After propensity score matching, 58 patients were matched in each of the ICG-FI and non-ICG-FI groups. There were no substantial differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The ICG-FI group and non-ICG-FI group included 40 and 38 women and had a median age of 65 (IQR 60-72) and 66 (IQR 60-73) years, respectively. The median follow-up for all patients was 63.7 (IQR 51.3-76.8) months. The estimated respective 3-year overall survival, RFS, and local recurrence rates were 93.1%, 70.7%, and 5.2% in the ICG-FI group and 85.9%, 71.7%, and 12.8% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.201, 0.653, 0.391). The 3-year cumulative LLR rate was 0% in the ICG-FI group and 9.3% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.048). This study revealed that laparoscopic LPLND combined with ICG-FI was able to decrease the LLR rate. It appears that ICG-FI could contribute to improving the quality of laparoscopic LPLND and strengthening local control of the lateral pelvis. This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000041372 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ).

Feasibility and short-term outcome of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer at an University Center

BackgroundOptimal treatments for lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis still remain controversial. Total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery combined with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) has 5-years pelvic recurrence lower than TME alone. LPLND had been adopted widely in Japan and around the world, but the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic LPLND in Vietnam have not been yet documented. MethodsA prospective, single group intervention study was conducted at our center. We recruited patients who had low rectal cancer (below peritoneal reflection) and LPLN with short-axis larger than 5 mm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Those who were over 80 years old and had severe comorbidity with life expectancy fewer than 5 years were excluded. ResultsFrom 01/2017 to 7/2019 we performed 22 laparoscopic LPLND. There was no conversion from laparoscopy to open procedure. The mean time for laparoscopic LPLND alone was 70 minutes and the average blood loss was 96.8 ml. Urinary retention occurred in 5 cases (22.7%). The incidence of positive LPLN was 45%, the mean lymph node harvested was 6. Short-axis and long-axis of LPLN on MRI were 13 mm and 19.5 mm in metastatic LPLN group comparing to 6.3 mm and 9.1 mm in non-metastatic group. ConclusionsLaparoscopic LPLND in low rectal cancer was a safe and feasible procedure with a low incidence of postoperative complications, low blood loss and short hospital stay. Laparoscopic LPLND should be indicated for patients with low rectal cancer, targeting those who have swollen LPLN on MRI.

Long-term effects of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on urinary retention in rectal cancer.

The addition of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in rectal cancer surgery has been reported to increase the incidence of post-operative urinary retention. Here, we assessed the predictive factors and long-term outcomes of urinary retention following laparoscopic LPLND (L-LPLND) with total mesorectal excision (TME) for advanced lower rectal cancer. This retrospective single-institutional study reviewed post-operative urinary retention in 71 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent L-LPLND with TME. Patients with preoperative urinary dysfunction or who underwent unilateral LPLND were excluded. Detailed information regarding patient clinicopathologic characteristics, post-void residual urine volume, and the presence or absence of urinary retention over time was collected from clinical and histopathologic reports and telephone surveys. Urinary retention was defined as residual urine > 100mL and the need for further treatment. Post-operative urinary retention was observed in 25/71 patients (35.2%). Multivariate analysis revealed that blood loss ≥ 400mL [odds ratio (OR) 4.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-16.43; p = 0.018] and inferior vesical artery (IVA) resection (OR 8.28; 95% CI 2.46-27.81; p < 0.001) were independently correlated with the incidence of urinary retention. Furthermore, bilateral IVA resection caused urinary retention in more patients than unilateral IVA resection (88.9% vs 47.1%, respectively; p = 0.049). Although urinary retention associated with unilateral IVA resection improved relatively quickly, urinary retention associated with bilateral IVA resection tended to persist over 1year. We identified the predictive factors of urinary retention following L-LPLND with TME, including increased blood loss (≥ 400mL) and IVA resection. Urinary retention associated with unilateral IVA resection improved relatively quickly. L-LPLND with unilateral IVA resection is a feasible and safe procedure to improve oncological curability. However, if oncological curability is guaranteed, bilateral IVA resection should be avoided to prevent irreversible urinary retention.

Long-term clinical outcomes of total mesorectal excision and selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced low rectal cancer: a comparative study of a robotic versus laparoscopic approach.

The long-term outcomes of minimally invasive lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) are not completely known. The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic LPND in low rectal cancer patients with suspected lymph node metastasis in the pelvic sidewall. We retrospectively reviewed the records of all rectal cancer patients who had laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) with LPND between March 2006 and June 2016. Stage IV patients were excluded. The outcomes of patients who had laparoscopic and robotic TME with LPND were compared. Twenty-nine patients had laparoscopic LPND and 70 had robotic LPND. No significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between the two groups. The urinary retention rate was lower in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (7.1% vs. 24.1%; p = 0.043). During a median follow-up of 44.3months, the overall recurrence rates were 48.3% and 31.4% in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.175). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 50.4% and 67.0% in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.227). The 5-year overall survival rates were 65.0% and 92.2% in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.017). Robotic TME with LPND is safe and feasible. In particular, it is associated with lower urinary retention. Robotic TME with LPND might yield a similar local recurrence rate and 5-year disease-free survival, but favorable long-term overall survival as compared to the laparoscopic approach. However, considering the retrospective nature and both major variables of TME and LPND involved together, this should be cautiously interpreted.

Surgical navigation system for laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery using laparoscopic-vision-tracked ultrasonic imaging.

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in rectal cancer surgery requires considerable skill because the pelvic arteries, which need to be located to guide the dissection, are covered by other tissues and cannot be observed on laparoscopic views. Therefore, surgeons need to localize the pelvic arteries accurately before dissection, to prevent injury to these arteries. This report proposes a surgical navigation system to facilitate artery localization in laparoscopic LPLND by combining ultrasonic imaging and laparoscopy. Specifically, free-hand laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) is employed to capture the arteries intraoperatively in this approach, and a laparoscopic vision-based tracking system is utilized to track the LUS probe. To extract the artery contours from the two-dimensional ultrasound image sequences efficiently, an artery extraction framework based on local phase-based snakes was developed. After reconstructing the three-dimensional intraoperative artery model from ultrasound images, a high-resolution artery model segmented from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images was rigidly registered to the intraoperative artery model and overlaid onto the laparoscopic view to guide laparoscopic LPLND. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the vision-based tracking system, and the average reconstruction error of the proposed tracking system was found to be 2.4mm. Then, the proposed navigation system was quantitatively evaluated on an artery phantom. The reconstruction time and average navigation error were 8min and 2.3mm, respectively. A navigation system was also successfully constructed to localize the pelvic arteries in laparoscopic and open surgeries of a swine. This demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed system in vivo. The construction times in the laparoscopic and open surgeries were 14 and 12min, respectively. The experimental results showed that the proposed navigation system can guide laparoscopic LPLND and requires a significantly shorter setting time than the state-of-the-art navigation systems do.

Laparoscopic versus open selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following total mesorectal excision for locally advanced low rectal cancer.

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) dissection represents a technically challenging procedure with a high potential risk of surgical morbidity. The purpose of this study was to compare the technical feasibility, safety, and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic LPLN dissection (LPLD) following total mesorectal excision (TME) with open LPLD for locally advanced low rectal cancer (LALRC). Between January 2010 and December 2016, consecutive patients with LALRC and swollen LPLNs who underwent laparoscopic or open TME with LPLD at our institution were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Data regarding patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and oncological outcomes were analyzed and compared. A total of 64 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-four patients underwent open procedure, and 30 underwent laparoscopic procedure. The mean blood loss volume was significantly less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (165 vs. 422mL; P = 0.012). The mean operative time was not significantly different between the laparoscopic and the open groups (354 ± 91 vs. 315 ± 78min; P = 0.522). The overall postoperative complication rates were 30.0% and 35.3% for the laparoscopic and open groups (P = 0.428), respectively. Postoperative urinary retention was significantly less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (14.7 vs. 0%; P = 0.036).The duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (8.5 ± 3.8 vs. 13.6 ± 6.5days; P = 0.025). The numbers of harvested lymph nodes and positive resection margin rates showed no significant differences. Pathological LPLN metastases were confirmed in 10 patients (29.4%) in the open group and 11 (36.7%) in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.537). The median follow-up duration was 41.5months (range 3-98). The laparoscopic and open groups also showed a similar 3-year overall survival rate (88.2% vs. 85.3%; P = 0.577), relapse-free survival rate (73.3% vs. 67.6%; P = 0.889), and local recurrence rate (3.3 vs. 5.9%; P = 0.653). Laparoscopic TME with LPLD is technically feasible and safe in selected patients with LALRC and is associated with similar oncological outcomes as open approach.

Adverse Effects on the Postoperative Urinary Function After Combined Resection of Inferior Vesical Artery in Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Retrospective Analysis of Consecutive 95 Series.

The combined resection of the vesical artery (VA) in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (L-LPLD) was reported to facilitate the safe dissection of metastatic lymph nodes. However, whether or not the combined VA resection affects the urinary function remains controversial. The purpose of the present study was to examine the risk factors for the postoperative urinary dysfunction (PUD) after L-LPLD followed by total mesorectal excision and to clarify the effects of the combined VA resection in L-LPLD on PUD. L-LPLD was performed in 95 patients with advanced rectal cancer at Saga University Hospital and Kyushu University Hospital from January 2013 to December 2017. The risk factors for PUD after L-LPLD were investigated. The univariate analysis revealed that the combined resection of the inferior vesical artery (IVA) was a risk factor for PUD. To examine by the type of IVA resection, the incidence of PUD significantly increased with the bilateral IVA resection, but the unilateral IVA resection induced PUD on the same level with the preservation of IVA. Bilateral IVA resection in L-LPLD could increase the incidence of PUD. Thus, if possible, the preservation of the unilateral IVA through L-LPLD should be considered.

Application of indocyanine green-enhanced near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUNDAs one effective treatment for lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis (LPNM), laparoscopic LPLN dissection (LPND) is limited due to the complicated anatomy of the pelvic sidewall and various complications after surgery. With regard to improving the accuracy and completeness of LPND as well as safety, we tried an innovative method using indocyanine green (ICG) visualized with a near-infrared (NIR) camera system to guide the detection of LPLNs in patients with middle-low rectal cancer.AIMTo investigate whether ICG-enhanced NIR fluorescence-guided imaging is a better technique for LPND in patients with rectal cancer.METHODSA total of 42 middle-low rectal cancer patients with clinical LPNM who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) and LPND between October 2017 and March 2019 at our institution were assessed and divided into an ICG group and a non-ICG group. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, pathological outcomes, and postoperative complication information were compared and analysed between the two groups.RESULTSCompared to the non-ICG group, the ICG group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (55.8 ± 37.5 mL vs 108.0 ± 52.7 mL, P = 0.003) and a significantly larger number of LPLNs harvested (11.5 ± 5.9 vs 7.1 ± 4.8, P = 0.017). The LPLNs of two patients in the non-IVG group were residual during LPND. In addition, no significant difference was found in terms of LPND, LPNM, operative time, conversion to laparotomy, preoperative complication, or hospital stay (P > 0.05).CONCLUSIONICG-enhanced NIR fluorescence-guided imaging could be a feasible and convenient technique to guide LPND because it could bring specific advantages regarding the accuracy and completeness of surgery as well as safety.

Utility of preoperative 3-D simulation of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: Surgical outcomes of 10 initial cases.

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) is technically challenging because of the complicated anatomy of the pelvic wall. To overcome this difficulty, we introduced preoperative 3-D simulation. The aim of the study is to investigate the usefulness of preoperative 3-D simulation for the safe conduct of laparoscopic LPLD for rectal cancer. After undergoing colonoscopy, patients were brought to the radiology suite where multi-detector row CT was performed. Three-dimensional images were constructed at a workstation and showed branches of the iliac artery and vein, ureter, urinary bladder, and enlarged lymph nodes. All members of the surgical team participated in preoperative simulation using the 3-D images. A total of 10 patients with advanced lower rectal cancer and enlarged lateral pelvic lymph nodes underwent laparoscopic unilateral LPLD after total mesorectal excision, tumor-specific mesorectal excision, or total proctocolectomy. Four of the 10 patients (40%) had variations in pelvic vascular anatomy. The median operative time for unilateral LPLD was 91 min (range, 66-142 min) and gradually declined, suggesting a good learning curve. The median number of lateral pelvic lymph nodes harvested was nine (range, 3-16). The median estimated blood loss was 13 mL (range, 10-160 mL). No conversion to open surgery or intraoperative complications occurred. No patient had major postoperative complications. Preoperative 3-D simulation may be useful for the safe conduct of laparoscopic LPLD, especially for surgeons with limited prior experience.

Clinical and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer: Single-institution Experience.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for total mesorectal excision (TME) with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in advanced lower rectal cancer. Forty-four patients who underwent TME with LPLD for lower rectal cancer (pStage II/III) between January 2008 and December 2014 were divided into two groups according to the type of surgical approach as follows: open LPLD group (OLD, n=17) and laparoscopic LPLD group (LLD, n=27). Operative time was comparable between the groups (p=0.15), whereas intraoperative blood loss and complication rates were significantly less in LLD than in OLD. Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in LLD than in OLD. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were similar in the two groups. Disease-free survival was better in LLD than in OLD, although the difference was not significant. Laparoscopic TME with LPLD is safe and feasible.

Feasibility of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision with Extended Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

The feasibility of additional lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is controversial, especially in laparoscopic surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of adding laparoscopic LPLND to TME in patients with advanced lower rectal cancer and swollen LPLNs treated with preoperative CRT. We reviewed 327 patients with lower rectal cancer without distant metastasis who underwent preoperative CRT followed by laparoscopic TME. Laparoscopic LPLND was added in patients with swollen LPLNs before CRT. Outcomes were compared between patients with (n=107) and without (n=220) LPLND. LPLN metastasis was found in 26 patients (24.3%) in the LPLND group. The operation time was significantly longer, and total blood loss was significantly greater in the LPLND than TME group (461 vs. 298min and 115 vs. 30mL, respectively; P<0.0001). The major complication rate was similar in the LPLND and TME groups (9.3 vs. 5.5%, respectively; P=0.188), and there were no conversions to open surgery. The LPLND and TME groups also showed a similar 3-year relapse-free survival rate (84.7 vs. 82.0%, respectively; P=0.536) and local recurrence rate (3.2 vs. 5.2%, respectively; P=0.569) despite significantly more patients with pathological lymph node metastasis in the LPLND than TME group (37.4 vs. 22.3%, respectively; P<0.0001). Additional laparoscopic LPLND is feasible in patients with advanced lower rectal cancer and clinically swollen LPLNs treated with preoperative CRT, with no significant increase in major complications compared with TME alone.

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgical therapy for advanced low rectal cancer patients. This study assessed potential risk factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (LPLM) and evaluated the feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic LPLD compared with the conventional open approach. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 90 patients with advanced low rectal cancer who underwent LPLD following total mesorectal excision at Kyushu University Hospital between January 2001 and July 2014. We compared the clinicopathological features between the patients with and without LPLM and the surgical outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic LPLD (LL) and open LPLD (OL). Fourteen (15.6%) patients had LPLM. Univariate analysis revealed that undifferentiated cancer, positive lymphatic invasion, >50% circumferential cancer extent, mesorectal lymph node metastases (MLM), and distant metastasis were associated with LPLM. In the multivariate analysis, MLM was the only independent risk factor for LPLM. Forty-six (51.1%) patients underwent LL, and 44 (48.9%) patients underwent OL. The mean surgical duration was longer in the LL group than in the OL group (641.0 vs. 312.0min, P<0.001). The LL group also had less hemorrhage (252.0 vs. 815.0mL, P<0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (22.9 vs. 29.1days, P=0.04) than the OL group. The mean number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes was larger in the LL group than in the OL group (19.5 vs. 15.8, P<0.05). The morbidity rate and overall survival (3-year OS: 94.7 vs. 82.9%, P=0.25) did not differ between the two groups. Patients with advanced low rectal cancer presenting MLM are good candidates for LPLD. Laparoscopic LPLD enables retrieval of more lymph nodes and may be acceptable for the treatment of advanced low rectal cancer.

Laparoscopic extended lateral pelvic node dissection following total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer: initial clinical experience

To evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) following total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. A review of a prospectively collected database at Kyungpook National University Hospital from May 2003 to September 2009 revealed a series of 16 consecutive laparoscopic TME with LPLD patients with preoperative diagnosis of lateral node metastasis. Data regarding patient demographics, operating time, perioperative blood loss, surgical morbidity, lateral lymph node status, functional outcome, and mid-term oncologic result were analyzed. In all 16 patients, the procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. During the study period, robot-assisted laparoscopic LPLD was performed in two patients. Mean operative time was 321.9 min (range 220-510 min). The mean number of lateral lymph nodes harvested was 9.1 (range 3-19), and a total of nine patients (56.2%) had lymph node metastases. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0 and 31.2%, respectively. Recovery after the procedure was rapid, and mean hospital stay was 9.9 days (range 7-14 days). With median follow-up of 38 months, among nine patients who were lateral pelvic node positive, one patient experienced pelvic side-wall local recurrence (11.2%). Laparoscopic TME with LPLD is safe and feasible, with the advantage of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective controlled study comparing laparoscopy and conventional open surgery with long-term follow-up evaluation is needed to confirm the authors' initial experience.