Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection Research Articles

Robotic intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer

This systematic review evaluated and compared the two currently available intersphincteric resection techniques (robotic and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection) for low rectal cancer, with the final aim of comparing associated factors between the two techniques. The assessed factors included surgical duration, hospital stay, complications, overall survival, local recurrence, and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). A literature search of the search engines “PubMed”, “SCOPUS”, and “Web of Science” was conducted, with a time interval set between 2015 and 2023. The initial search yielded 57 studies, of which 10 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Hence, data was extracted from only these 10 studies. The average reported robotic surgery time varied between 197 and 472 mins, while the laparoscopic surgery time varied between 240 and 325 mins. Conversely, the overall survival and local recurrence rates were 89.7% and 6.7% for robotic and 87.9% and 6.2% for laparoscopic resection, respectively. In addition, complications were reported in 16.5% and 18.2% of robotic and laparoscopic resection cases, respectively. This systematic review showed that although the surgery duration is longer in robotic resection compared to laparoscopic resection, the former technique is associated with lower rates of complications and local recurrence, and improved overall survival. In addition, few studies have reported on the prevalence of LARS; therefore, we recommend that this field be studied and included in the reported data of the upcoming studies to allow more conclusive evidence regarding prevalence of LARS among the two groups of intersphincteric resections.

Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is a viable option for sphincter preservation in early ultra-low rectal cancer, but postoperative anal dysfunction remains a concern. This study evaluates the outcomes of robotic ISR with coloanal anastomosis in early ultra-low rectal cancer, comparing its efficacy and safety with laparoscopic ISR. Retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 74 consecutive patients undergoing robotic intersphincteric resection (R-ISR) for early ultra-low rectal cancer between January 2017 and December 2018 (R-ISR group), matched with 110 patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (L-ISR). After 1:1 propensity score matching, each group comprised 68 patients. Comparative analyses covered surgical outcomes, complications, long-term results, and anal function. The R-ISR group showed longer total operative time than the L-ISR group (211.7 ± 25.3min vs. 191.2 ± 23.0min, p = 0.001), but less intraoperative bleeding (55.2 ± 20.7ml vs. 69.2 ± 22.9ml, p = 0.01). R-ISR group had fewer conversions to APR surgery (6/8.8% vs. 14/20.6%). Other perioperative indicators were similar. R-ISR exhibited a smaller tumor margin, superior mesorectal integrity, and comparable histopathological outcomes. Postoperative complications, 3-year and 5-year DFS, and OS were similar. At the 1-year follow-up, the Wexner Incontinence Score favored R-ISR (9.24 ± 4.03 vs. 11.06 ± 3.77, p = 0.048). Although R-ISR prolongs the operative time, its surgical safety and oncological outcomes are similar to conventional ISR procedures. Furthermore, it further shortens the margin of anal preservation, reduces the rate of conversion to APR surgery, and improves postoperative anal function.

Articulating forceps in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: A video comparison with robotic surgery

AbstractIntroductionTotal mesorectal excision (TME) is an established standard procedure for rectal surgery; however, it is technically challenging because of the deep and narrow pelvis. Minimally invasive surgeries have gained prominence for TME with favorable outcomes but come with limitations. Laparoscopic surgery often has dexterity restrictions because of the use of straight forceps, whereas robotic surgery is impeded by high costs and extended operative times. Articulating forceps aim to bridge the gap between these methods by offering enhanced dexterity at a lower cost.Patients and Surgical TechniqueThis video study involves two female patients diagnosed with lower rectal cancer. One patient underwent laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap‐ISR) using the ArtiSential articulating forceps (LIVSMED Inc.), and the other underwent robot‐assisted low anterior resection (Rob‐LAR) using the da Vinci Xi System. Both operations involved similar mesorectal dissection steps, except for the anastomosis. The standard port placement was used, and dissection was performed circumferentially down to the perianal region.DiscussionThe ArtiSential demonstrated effectiveness comparable with the da Vinci Xi system in TME surgery, with the potential advantage of improved cost‐effectiveness.

Risk factors, quality of life, and oncological effects of refractory anastomotic leakage for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection.

Refractory anastomotic leakage (RAL) after intersphincteric resection (ISR) usually leads to failure of protective stoma reversal in ultralow rectal cancers. The aim of this study is to assess the risk factors and oncological outcomes of both anastomotic leakage (AL) and RAL, and quality of life (QoL) of RAL after laparoscopic ISR (LsISR). A total of 371 ultralow rectal cancer patients with LsISR were enrolled from a tertiary colorectal surgery referral center. Risk factors for AL and RAL were identified by logistic regression. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) of AL and RAL was analyzed by the Cox regression. QoL of RAL group (compared with non-RAL group) was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. The rates of AL and RAL after LsISR accounted for 8.4% (31/371) and 4.6% (17/371) in this cohort, respectively. Non-left colic artery preservation (odds ratio [OR]=3.491, P=0.009), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (OR=6.038, P<0.001), and lower anastomosis height (OR=5.271, P=0.010) were independent risk factors for AL, while nCRT (OR=11.602, P<0.001) was the only independent risk factor for RAL. Male (hazard ratio [HR]=1.989, P=0.014), age>60years (HR=1.877, P=0.018), and lymph node metastasis (HR=2.125, P=0.005) were independent risk factors of poor 3-year DFS, but not RAL (P=0.646). RAL patients have significantly worse global health status, worse emotional and social function scores at the late postoperative stage, and worse urinary and sexual function at the early postoperative stage (all P<0.05). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was an independent risk factor for RAL after LsISR. RAL shows similar oncological outcomes, but with poor QoL.

Long-term outcomes and failure patterns after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection in ultralow rectal cancers

Long-term outcomes and failure patterns after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection in ultralow rectal cancers

Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer has always been a serious difficulty for surgeons. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) are commonly used Anus-preserving surgeries for low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical use of two surgical methods. A total of 152 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with taTME in 75 cases and ISR in 77 cases. After propensity score matching, 46 patients in each group were included in the study. Perioperative outcomes, anal function scores (Wexner incontinence score) and quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ CR38) at least 1year after surgery were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgical outcomes, pathological examination of surgical specimens, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications, except for patients in the taTME group who had their indwelling catheters removed later. Anal Wexner incontinence score was lower in taTME group than ISR group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, the physical function and role function scores in the ISR group were lower than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05), while the fatigue, pain symptoms, and constipation scores in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-CR38 scale, the scores of gastrointestinal symptoms and defecation problems in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05). Compared with ISR surgery, taTME surgery is comparable in terms of surgical safety and short-term efficacy, and has better long-term anal function and quality of life. From the perspective of long-term anal function and quality of life, taTME surgery is a better surgical method for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Functional outcomes after robotic or laparoscopic intersphincteric resection - An inverse probability weighting analysis.

Functional outcomes after robotic and laparoscopic Intersphincteric resections (ISR) have not been studied adequately. We aimed to compare the bowel functions after robotic or laparoscopic ISR. Single-center, cross-sectional study of minimally invasive ISR. Functional outcomes were assessed on the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), Wexner incontinence scale, and the Kirwan grading. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, T stage, tumour height, preoperative radiation, and anastomotic configuration) in the groups were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Functional outcomes were assessed for 132 patients, 85 laparoscopic and 47 robotic ISR were performed. After IPTW, baseline characteristics were well balanced (mean deviation <0.1). In the weighted cohorts of laparoscopic and robotic ISR, major LARS was observed in 18.1% and 18.5% (p - 0.182) and major incontinence on the Wexner scale in 18.4% and 22.8% (p - 0.443), respectively. The Kirwan grades of incontinence were also similar between the groups (p - 0.794). No differences in bowel functions on the LARS and incontinence scales between laparoscopic and robotic ISR were found in the present study.

Risk factor and nomogram for predicting the probability of a permanent stoma after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer

Objective: A permanent stoma can seriously affect patients' quality of life. Clinicians need to consider the risk of a permanent stoma when making clinical decisions. This study analyzed preoperative predictors of a permanent stoma after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer (LISR), and a prediction model was constructed validated. Methods: This was a retrospective study that analyzed clinical data of 331 ultralow rectal cancer patients who were diagnosed with primary rectal adenocarcinoma by endoscopy and pathology, including 218 males and 113 female, (58.8±11.2) years and (23.7±3.1) kg/m2. The patients underwent LISR with a preventive stoma from January 2012 to December 2020. Patients with multiple primary colorectal cancers, who underwent emergency surgery for intestinal obstruction or bleeding or perforation, and did not complete 18 months follow up were exclucled. R software was used to randomly select 234 patients as the modeling group with a ratio of approximately 7:3, and the remaining 97 patients comprised the validation group. The stoma site was determined by the surgeon before the operation, and the ileum 30 cm from the ileocecal valve was selected. The rates of a permanent stoma for the entire group and the preoperative clinical factors that may affect the permanency of a stoma in the modeling group were determined. A permanent stoma was defined as failure to close the stoma at 18 months after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the preoperative independent risk factors for a permanent stoma after LISR. R software was used to create the nomogram model, and the predictive ability of the nomogram model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Among the 331 patients who underwent LISR, 37 (26 cases in the modeling group and 11 cases in the validation group, 11.2%) developed a permanent stoma for the following reasons: anastomotic stenosis due to leakage (16 cases, 43.2%), distant metastasis (16 cases, 43.2%), intolerant to stoma closure surgery (3 cases, 8.1%), stenosis due to postoperative radiation (1 case, 2.7%), and poor recovery of anorectal function (1 case, 2.7%). Univariate analysis showed that preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, poorly differentiated tumor, cT3 stage, and distant metastasis were associated with a permanent stoma. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy [OR=3.078, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.326-7.147; P=0.009], cT3 stage (OR=2.257, 95%CI: 1.001-5.091; P=0.049), and stage IV cancer (OR=16.180, 95%CI: 2.753-95.102; P=0.002) were independent risk factors for permanent stoma after LISR. Based on the selected risk factors, a nomogram model for predicting permanent stoma was constructed. The area under the ROC curve of the modeling group was 0.793, the optimal cut-off value was 0.890, the sensitivity was 0.577, and the specificity was 0.885. The area under the ROC curve of the validation group was 0.953. The corrected curves of the modeling group and the validation group showed a good degree of fit. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, cT3 stage, and distant metastasis are independent predictors of a permanent stoma after LISR, and the nomogram model is helpful to predict the probability of a permanent stoma. Patients with high-risk factors should be adequately informed of the risk of a permanent stoma before colorectal surgery.

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection vs. transanal total mesorectal excision in overweight patients with low rectal cancer.

ObjectiveAnus-preserving surgery in overweight patients with low rectal cancer has been a challenge due to the narrow operating space. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) was once a standard therapeutic option for low rectal cancer. The effectiveness of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in treating this group of patients remains uncertain as a new surgical strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effects of taTME with ISR in overweight patients with low rectal cancer.MethodsA total of 53 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with taTME in 31 cases and ISR in 22 cases. The surgery-related data, pathological manifestations of surgical specimens, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications were compared.ResultsPatients in both groups completed the surgery successfully. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, anastomotic distance from the anal verge and ileostomy between the two groups (P > 0.05). TaTME group performed or virtually finished resection of the rectal mesentery, and no positive cases of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) or Distal Resection Margin (DRM) were detected in either group. The number of lymph nodes found in surgical specimens did not change significantly between the two groups (P = 0.391). In the subgroup analysis, however, more lymph nodes were detected in female patients undergoing taTME than in male patients (P = 0.028). The ISR group took less time to remove the drainage tubes (P = 0.013) and the same results were obtained in both groups of male patients in the subgroup analysis (P = 0.011). There were no statistically significant differences in time to start liquid diet, time to remove catheters, time to start flatus, time to begin ambulation, postoperative hospital stay, and readmission within 30 days after surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, female patients in the taTME group were initiated ambulation earlier than males in the subgroup analysis (P = 0.034). The difference was insignificant in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusiontaTME is safe and feasible for the treatment of overweight patients with low rectal cancer.

Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

Aim of this study was to compare operative, long-term oncological and functional outcomes of laparoscopic (LISR) and robotic (RISR) intersphincteric resection in low-lying rectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database was performed. 115 cases (LISR, n = 55; RISR, n = 60) were performed by a single surgeon (January 2011-January 2020). Clinical characteristics did not differ between the groups. Operating time was longer in RISR (160.0 ± 45.7 vs. 205.0 ± 36.5min, p = 0.035). There was no conversion in RISR, whereas in LISR, two patients (3.6%) converted to open surgery. Complete mesorectum was 61.8% and 83.3% for LISR and RISR (p = 0.046), respectively. Circumferential radial margin involvement was 10.9% and 8.3% in LISR and RISR (p = 0.365), respectively. Median follow-up was 82.8 (30-138) months for LISR and 83.6 (30-138) months for RISR. Three-, five-, and seven-year overall survival rates (OS) for LISR and RISR were: 88.6%, 80.4%, 73.4% and 90.4%, 86.3%, 76.9%, respectively. Three-, five-, and seven-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for LISR and RISR were 80.5%, 75.2%, 70.4% and 84.4%, 81.4%, 79.8% (p = 0.328), respectively. Three-, five-, and seven-year local recurrence-free survival rates in LISR and RISR were: 96.1%, 92.6%, 88.4% and 96.7%, 94.2%, 90.4% (p = 0.573), respectively. Mean Wexner score for LISR (n = 32) and RISR (n = 40) was: 10.5 ± 4.7 and 9.8 ± 4.2 (p = 0.782), respectively. Colostomy-free survival in LISR and RISR was: 3 years 94.5%/95.2%, 5 years 89.1%/91.7%, and 7 years 83.6%/85.0%. RISR is associated with better mesorectal integrity, no conversion, and lower postoperative complication rate. RISR has longer operation time. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes are similar in both groups.

Impact of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green on structural sequelae of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of malignant rectal tumors.

Recent studies have indicated the potential benefit of intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIR-FI) with indocyanine green in reducing early anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Nonetheless, whether NIR-FI is effective in reducing structural sequelae of anastomotic leakage (SSAL) remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of NIR-FI on SSAL after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) of malignant rectal tumors. This study was a retrospective single-center cohort study. A total of 293 consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic ISR from May 2010 to August 2017 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups; those who underwent elective laparoscopic ISR with lymphadenectomy for malignant rectal tumors using NIR-F (NIR-FI group) and those who underwent elective laparoscopic ISR with lymphadenectomy for malignant rectal tumors without using NIR-FI (control group). Thirty were excluded from the analyses (13 died, 7 had pelvic recurrence, and 10 were lost to follow-up). The primary endpoint was the rate of SSAL within 2years after the primary resection, whereas the secondary endpoint was the rate of natural defecation via the anus at 2years after the primary resection. Using various statistical analyses, such as propensity score matching, the rate of SSAL was compared between groups. A total of 263 patients were analyzed [177 males and 86 females, median age 61 (27-84) years]. Prior to propensity score matching (n = 263), NIR-FI was performed in 70 patients (26.6%) The rates of SSAL were 1.4% (1/70) in the NIR-FI group and 10.4% (20/193) in the control group (p = 0.02). After propensity score matching (n = 163), the rates of SSAL were 1.5% (1/66) in the NIR-FI group and 11.7% (12/103) in the control group (p = 0.02). Propensity score analyses, as well as simple regression analyses, revealed that NIR-FI was associated with a significantly lower risk of SSAL (OR 0.10-0.13; p = 0.03-0.05). NIR-FI is useful in reducing the rate of SSAL after laparoscopic ISR.

Clinical efficacy of different approaches for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: a comparison study

BackgroundThe operative results of different approaches for the laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LAISR) of low rectal cancer vary, and the patient characteristics associated with the best outcomes for each procedure have not been reported. We compared the efficacy of different approaches for LAISR of low rectal cancer and discussed the surgical indications for each approach.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from 235 patients with low rectal cancer treated via LAISR from October 2010 to September 2016. Patients underwent either the transabdominal approach for ISR (TAISR, n = 142), the transabdominal perineal approach for ISR (TPAISR, n = 57), or the transanal pull-through approach for ISR (PAISR, n = 36).ResultsThe PAISR and TAISR groups exhibited shorter operation times and less intraoperative blood loss than the TPAISR group. The anastomotic distance was shorter in the PAISR and TPAISR groups than in the TAISR group. No differences in the ability to perform radical resection, overall complications, postoperative recovery, Wexner score recorded 12 months after ostomy closure, 3-year disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, or overall survival (OS) were observed among the three groups.ConclusionsTAISR, TPAISR, and PAISR have unique advantages and do not differ in terms of operation safety, patient outcomes, or anal function. TPAISR requires a longer time to complete and is associated with more bleeding and a slower recovery of anal function. PAISR should be considered when TAISR cannot ensure a negative distal margin and the tumor and BMI are relatively small; otherwise, TPAISR is required.

The clinical impact of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery associated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been performed in various fields, especially in the pelvic cavity. However, little is known about the utility of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery associated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We herein report the clinical impact of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery associated with RARP. We experienced five cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery associated with RARP. One involved robot-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with en bloc prostatectomy for T4b rectal cancer, and one involved robot-assisted laparoscopic intersphincteric resection combined with RARP for synchronous rectal and prostate cancer. The remaining three involved robot-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection (RaLAR) after RARP. For robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, the da Vinci Xi surgical system was used. We could perform planned robotic rectal cancer surgery in all cases. The median operation time was 529 min (373-793 min), and the median blood loss was 307 ml (32-1191 ml). No patients required any transfusion in the intra-operative or immediate peri-operative period. The circumferential resection margin was negative in all cases. There were no complications of grade ≥III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and no conversions to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery associated with RARP is feasible in patients with rectal cancer. The long-term surgical outcomes remain to be further evaluated.

Analysis of risk factors of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and construction of a nomogram prediction model

Objectives: To examine the risk factors of anastomotic leakage for low rectal cancers undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR), and to construct a nomogram prediction model for it. Methods: The perioperative data of 302 low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic ISR by the same surgical team of Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital between January 2012 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 190 males and 112 females, aging 60(14) years (range: 20 to 84 years). χ2 test, independent sample t test, U test and Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors for anastomotic leakage. R software was used to complete the drawing of the nomogram prediction model, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of the nomogram prediction model. Results: There were 24 patients (7.9%) had anastomotic leakage among the 302 patients enrolled, including 10 cases of grade A leakage, 9 cases of grade B leakage, and 5 cases of grade C leakage. Out of the 24 patients, 2 patients (8.3%) died, 3 patients (12.5%) received leakage-related reoperation. Median healing time of the anastomotic leakage was 74 (58) days (range: 14 to 180 days). Univariate analysis showed male gender (P=0.009), preoperative serum albumin concentration (P=0.004), neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (P=0.017), preserving left colonic artery (P=0.002) and performing a diverting ileostomy (P=0.015) were significantly correlated with anastomotic leakage. Logistic multivariate analysis showed male gender (OR=6.052, 95%CI: 1.535 to 23.860, P=0.010), neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (OR=4.098, 95%CI: 1.318 to 12.821, P=0.015), no preserving left colonic artery (OR=16.699, 95%CI: 3.051 to 91.406, P=0.001) and not performing a diverting ileostomy (OR=21.218, 95%CI: 4.341 to 103.710, P<0.01) were independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. According to the results of multi-factor regression analysis, the nomogram prediction model was constructed. The area under the curve of the nomogram prediction model was 0.840 (95%CI: 0.766 to 0.914). After internal verification, the concordance index value of the model was 0.840. Conclusion: Male gender, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, no preserving left colonic artery and not performing a diverting ileostomy are independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage for low rectal cancers undergoing laparoscopic ISR.

Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Permanent Stoma after Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for the development of a permanent stoma in laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LS-ISR) for ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma and to develop and validate a prediction model to predict the probability of permanent stoma after surgery. MethodsA primary cohort consisting of 301 consecutive patients who underwent LS-ISR was enrolled in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors and develop the nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. An independent validation cohort contained 91 consecutive patients from January 2012 to January 2019. ResultsThe permanent stoma rate was 11.3% (34/301) in the primary cohort and 18.7% (17/91) in the validation cohort. Multivariable analysis revealed that nCRT (OR, 3.195; 95% CI, 1.169-8.733; P=0.024), ASA score of 3 (OR, 5.062; 95% CI, 1.877-13.646; P=0.001), distant metastasis (OR, 14.645; 95% CI, 3.186-67.315; P=0.001), and anastomotic leakage (OR, 11.308; 95% CI, 3.650-35.035; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for permanent stoma, and a nomogram was established. The AUCs of the nomogram were 0.842 and 0.858 in the primary and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves showed good calibration in both cohorts. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful. ConclusionWe developed and validated a nomogram for ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent LS-ISR, and the nomogram could help surgeons identify which patients are at a higher risk of a permanent stoma after surgery.

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis in the treatment of low rectal cancer: 10-year experience

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis in the treatment of low rectal cancer: 10-year experience

Three Cases of Anastomotic Complications after Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection Treated with Intra-anal Canal Re-anastomosis

Three Cases of Anastomotic Complications after Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection Treated with Intra-anal Canal Re-anastomosis

Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer.

The aim was to evaluate the physiological variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap-ISR) for ultralow rectal cancer. This was a retrospective study that included 56 patients who underwent Lap-ISR from a prospectively collected database. The RAIR was examined preoperatively and up to 12 months after ileostomy closure. The primary outcome included physiological variation in RAIR and its difference between partial, subtotal and total ISR. The secondary outcome was its correlation with functional outcome. The reflex was present in 95% (53/56) of patients preoperatively, in 36% (20/56) before ileostomy closure, in 48% (27/56) at 3-6months and in 61% (34/56) at 12 months after ileostomy closure. The elicited volume of RAIR was significantly increased at 12 months after ileostomy closure than at baseline (P=0.005), but its duration and amplitude did not differ significantly. There was no significant difference in the reflex recovery between the ISR groups (partial vs. subtotal vs. total: 65% vs. 63% vs. 44%, P=0.61). At 12 months after ileostomy closure, the RAIR-present group had favourable functional results and patient satisfaction (P<0.05). Major faecal incontinence was found in 82% of patients in the RAIR-absent group. The RAIR is abolished in the majority of patients after Lap-ISR, but a time-dependent recovery could be observed in more than half of the patients. The reflex recovery is not influenced by the resection grade of the internal sphincter. However, persistent loss of the RAIR correlates with worse continence.

Effects of needlescopic surgery on postoperative pain in intersphincteric or abdominoperineal resection.

Laparoscopic surgery allows minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer, and needlescopic surgery (NS) offers even more minimally invasive operations beyond the scope of conventional laparoscopic surgery (CS). The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of NS for intersphincteric resection (ISR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) to treat anal or rectal cancer without an abdominal incision for specimen extraction and to measure abdominal wound pain compared to CS. Between September 2014 and December 2016, a total of 134 patients underwent laparoscopic ISR or APR. Of these, 26 patients underwent NS, and 108 patients underwent CS. Postoperative abdominal wound pain was estimated using the numerical rating scale. Short-term outcomes were compared between NS and CS. No conversion to CS or open surgery was required. Median operation time was significantly shorter with NS (295 min) than with CS (331.5 min; p = 0.020). Median estimated blood loss was significantly lower with NS (30 ml) than with CS (50 ml; p = 0.011). Postoperative pain score on postoperative day (POD)5 was significantly lower with NS than with CS (p = 0.025), and frequencies of analgesic use were significantly lower with NS than with CS on POD0, POD2, and POD3 (p = 0.032, p = 0.017, p = 0.045, respectively). The postoperative complications occurred at similar frequencies between groups (p = 0.655). NS for ISR or APR offers comparable short-term outcomes to CS, with better pain outcomes.

ISR for T1-2 Low Rectal Cancer: A Japanese Approach.

The evolution over the past 20 years of anal preservation in rectal cancer surgery has been truly remarkable. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) reported by Schiessel in 1994 in Australia has been shown to enable anal preservation even for cancers quite close to the anus. In Japan, ISR via the detachment of the anal canal between the internal and external sphincters and excision of the internal sphincter first began to be practiced in the latter half of 1990. A multicenter Phase II trial of ISR in Japan suggested that 70% of the cases had relatively good function with less than 10 points of Wexner score but around 10% had severe incontinence that would not be improved for long term. The primary end point of the clinical study, 3-year local recurrence rate, was 13.2% across the overall cohort (T1, 0%; T2, 6.9%; and T3, 21.6%). When ISR is performed on T1/T2 rectal cancers, sufficient circumferential resection margin can be obtained even without preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and local recurrence rate was acceptably low. Based on these evidences, ISR is a currently important, standard treatment option among anal-preserving surgeries for T1/T2 low-lying rectal cancers. In Japan, a feasibility study (LapRC trial) of laparoscopic ISR on Stage 0 and Stage 1 low rectal cancer showed excellent outcomes. A prospective Phase II clinical trial targeting low rectal cancers within 5 cm from the anal verge (ultimate trial) is being performed and awaiting the results in near future.