Laparoscopic Hiatoplasty Research Articles

Giant Hiatal Hernia and P4HB Phasix TMST Mesh Hiatoplasty Outcomes

Surgical repair of giant hiatal hernia (GHH) and associated high recurrence rate defy technological advances in surgical sciences despite better instrumentation and availability of various mesh prostheses. Aim: This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of long-lasting biosynthetic absorbable Poly 4 Hydroxybutyrate Phasix TMST mesh outcomes in patients with GHH undergoing hiatal hernia repair. Methods: We studied a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent GHH repair between September 2020 and October 2023. Primary outcome measures were 30-day mortality and postoperative morbidities. Secondary outcome measures were 90-day readmission rates, patient-reported outcomes derived through modified Visick grading and recurrence of hiatus hernia. Results: 44 patients were included in this study. Median follow-up is twenty-four months. There was no mortality at 30 days. 4.5% (n=2) experienced significant complications at 30 days. Median length of stay was 3 days. 81% reported clinical improvement with enhanced Visick grade, and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) cessation rate was 77.4%. There were no readmissions at 90 days. 9.1% who reported symptom recurrence had anatomical hiatus hernia recurrence. Conclusion: The study showed laparoscopic hiatoplasty with P4B Phasix TMST mesh has low morbidity and recurrence with medium-term follow-up.

Postoperative exacerbated cough hypersensitivity syndrome induces dramatic respiratory alkalosis, lactatemia, and electrolyte imbalance

BackgroundThe perioperative management of patients with chronic cough or cough hypersensitivity syndrome and its sometimes severe effects is currently under-researched and under-reported.Case presentationA 46-year-old female patient with a history of chronic cough and Cough Hypersensitivity Syndrome. After laparoscopic hiatoplasty and anterior fundoplication under general anesthesia, experienced a pronounced exacerbation of coughing symptoms. Despite prompt and extensive treatment involving antitussives, inhalants, anxiolytics, and sedatives, the symptoms remained uncontrollable. Within a few hours, the patient developed a respiratory alkalosis with severe and life-threatening electrolyte shift (pH 7.705, pCO2 1.72 kPa, K+ 2.1 mmol/l). Lactatemia lasted for more than 12 hours with values up to 6.6 mmol/l. Acute bleeding, pneumothorax, and an acute cardiac event were ruled out. Deep analgosedation and inhalation of high-percentage local anesthetics were necessary to manage the clinical symptoms.ConclusionsThis case highlights the challenging nature of chronic cough and hypersensitivity syndrome perioperatively. A tailored anesthesiologic approach, exclusion of other provoking medical problems, and knowledge of possible management and treatment options are key.

Impact of antireflux surgery on gastroesophageal reflux-associated symptoms and quality of life.

Reflux disease has become endemic in the Western world. High quality hiatal reconstruction and fundoplication has a paramount importance in its therapy. While the primary goal of surgery is reducing reflux-associated disease burden, the evaluation and follow-up of disease-associated quality of life is essential. In this study, we aimed to measure and evaluate the pre- and post-operative reflux-associated quality of life of patients undergoing surgery between 01. 12. 2015 and 31. 12. 2020 at a tertiary care hospital. We utilized a health-related quality of life questionnaire both pre- and post-operatively. The main outcome measures were: patient-assessed heartburn, dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, nausea and vomiting. We also measured acid secretory medication use and patient satisfaction. We have assessed the pre- and post-operative questionnaries of 65 patients. All the symptoms above have decreased after surgery, and the changes were statistically significant (except for dysphagia). There was a tendency for minor weight loss after surgery. The use of acid secretion inhibitor medications decreased significantly. Our results are comparable to the outcomes of other tertiary care centers. Our workgroup has successfully adopted the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of the surgical care of reflux disease. If the proper indications for surgery are met, laparoscopic hiatoplasty and Toupet fundoplication are capable tools in decreasing reflux-associated symptoms and improving reflux-associated quality of life. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(2): 57-63.

Patient-tailored algorithm for laparoscopic cruroplasty standardization: comparison with hiatal surface area and medium-term outcomes.

Different methods have been described for laparoscopic hiatoplasty and hiatus hernia (HH) repair. All techniques are not standardized and the choice to reinforce or not the hiatus with a mesh is left to the operating surgeon's preference. Hiatal surface area (HSA) has been described as an attempt at standardization; in case the area is > 4 cm2, a mesh is used to reinforce the repair. The aim of this study was to describe a new patient-tailored algorithm (PTA), compare its performance in predicting crura mesh buttressing to HSA, and analyze outcomes. Retrospective, single-center, descriptive study (September 2018-September 2021). Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic HH repair. Outcomes and quality of life measured with the disease-specific gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and reflux symptom index (RSI) were analyzed. Fifty patients that underwent laparoscopic hiatoplasty and Toupet fundoplication were included. The median age was 61 years (range 32-83) and the median BMI was 26.7 (range 17-36). According to the PTA, 27 patients (54%) underwent simple suture repair while crural mesh buttressing with Phasix-ST® was used in 23 (46%). According to the HSA, the median hiatus area was 4.7 cm2 while 26 patients had an HSA greater than 4 cm2. The overall concordance rate between PTA and HSA was 94% (47/50). The median hospital stay was 1.9 days (range 1-8) and the 90-day complication rate was 4%. The median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 1-35). Hernia recurrence was diagnosed in 6%. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in one patient (2%). The GERD-HRQL (p < 0.001) and RSI (p = 0.001) were significantly improved. The application of PTA for cruroplasty standardization in the setting of HH repair seems effective. While concordance with HSA is high, the PTA seems easier and promptly available in the operative theater with a potential increase in procedure standardization, reproducibility, and teaching.

Minimally invasive therapy of upside-down stomach: A single-center experience

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive therapy in Type IV hiatal hernia (upside-down stomach). Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of 58 consecutively operated patients with Type IV hiatal hernia between 1998 and 2015 was conducted. Short-term outcome was evaluated using Clavien-Dindo classification and long-term outcomes using phone survey and subjective assessment of patients at least 1 year following surgery. Results: Laparoscopic hiatoplasty was performed in all patients, with gastropexy in 55.2%, fundoplication in 39.6%, and combination of fundoplication and gastropexy in 5.2%. Complications were observed in 6.9%. Two early reoperations (within 30 days) due to acute reherniation were necessary. Adverse events occurred in seven cases – pleural opening and peroperative bleeding. Three patients were reoperated laparoscopically 2–17 months after the first surgery due to receiving partial stomach herniation. In 67.2% of patients, long-term subjective quality of life assessment was available. Eighty percent of them were completely satisfied, without recurrence of preoperative symptoms. Conclusion: Elective laparoscopic surgery of hiatal hernia Type IV is a safe procedure, which has all the benefits of minimally invasive therapy with favorable short- and long-term results.

The laparoscopic hiatoplasty with antireflux surgery is a safe and effective procedure to repair giant hiatal hernia

BackgroundAlthough minimally invasive repair of giant hiatal hernias is a very surgical challenge which requires advanced laparoscopic learning curve, several reports showed that is a safe and effective procedure, with lower morbidity than open approach. In the present study we show the outcomes of 13 patients who underwent a laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia.MethodsA total of 13 patients underwent laparoscopic posterior hiatoplasty and Nissen fundoplication. Follow-up evaluation was done clinically at intervals of 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery using the Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Health-Related Quality of Life scale, a barium swallow study, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, an oesophageal manometry, a combined ambulatory 24-h multichannel impedance pH and bilirubin monitoring. Anatomic recurrence was defined as any evidence of gastric herniation above the diaphragmatic edge.ResultsThere were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open technique. Symptomatic GORD-HQL outcomes demonstrated a statistical significant decrease of mean value equal to 3.2 compare to 37.4 of preoperative assessment (p < 0.0001). Combined 24-h multichannel impedance pH and bilirubin monitoring after 12 months did not show any evidence of pathological acid or non acid reflux.ConclusionAll patients were satisfied of procedure and no hernia recurrence was recorded in the study group, treated respecting several crucial surgical principles, e.g., complete sac excision, appropriate crural closure, also with direct hiatal defect where possible, and routine use of antireflux procedure.

Prophylactic Laparoscopic Hiatoplasty Technique with a Bioabsorbable Synthetic Tissue Regenerator in the Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopic fundoplication has been confirmed as an effective long-term therapy in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, but has been reported that various facto...

Aortic injury during laparoscopic esophageal hiatoplasty

A 75-year-old female patient with a type III hiatal hernia was submitted to laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty. Soon after the last suture fixed the mesh to the left crura, a hemorrhage was observed. Conversion to open surgery was not performed. The most common sources of bleeding (liver, phrenic arteries, crura, spleen, and short gastric vessels) were discarded as the cause of the hemorrhage. The mesh was set free in order to explore the lower mediastinum. The source of the hemorrhage was identified: it was the last suture fixing the mesh to the left crura, which was found passing through the aortic wall. The hemorrhage stopped as soon as the suture was removed. When facing a hemorrhage during this kind of surgery, it is essential to be methodical to discover the source of the bleeding. First of all, the most common sources of bleeding must be checked out. Injury of the inferior vena cava must also be ruled out, because it is an uncommon but potentially lethal complication. Afterwards, the lower mediastinum must be explored. Conversion to an open approach is needed if the patient becomes unstable or the surgeon does not have enough laparoscopic skills to find and solve the bleeding. Most of the reported cases of aortic injury during laparoscopic hiatoplasty are secondary to vascular injuries during port insertion. When a suture is the cause of bleeding, the removal of the stitch should be enough to stop the bleeding. If there is a tear of the aortic wall, a patch should be employed for the repair. In conclusion, left crura and thoracic aorta are very close to one another. The surgeon must be very careful when working near the left crura, mostly in old patients with a dilated and aneurysmatic aorta.

Esophageal angulation after hiatoplasty and fundoplication: a cause of dysphagia?

Hiatoplasty is generally considered an essential part of antireflux operations. Posterior closure of an enlarged hiatus may lead to anterior displacement of the esophagus and it may be contributory to postoperative dysphagia. The aims of this study were to (i) measure the normal esophageal anteroposterior angulation, (ii) evaluate the variation of the angulation after laparoscopic hiatoplasty and fundoplication, and (iii) correlate the angulation with postoperative dysphagia. Normal esophageal anteroposterior angle determined by barium preoperative barium esophagram was evaluated based on the study of 100 patients. Postoperative angulation was evaluated based on the study of 32 patients who underwent barium esophagram after laparoscopic hiatoplasty and fundoplication. The results showed that the normal esophageal anteroposterior angle was 150.4 +/- 10.7 (range 119-169) degrees. There was no correlation between the angle and gender (P = 0.6) or age (P = 0.1). Postoperative angle averaged 146.6 +/- 11.7 (range 122-170) degrees. Normal and post-operative angle were not different (P = 0.1). The difference between post- and preoperative angle averaged 0.7 +/- 8.9 (range -15-14). There was no statistically significant difference when pre- and post-operative angles were compared (P = 0.6). De novo dysphagia was present in 31% of the 32 postoperative patients. There was no statistically significant difference when the angles in patients with and without de novo dysphagia were compared (P = 0.2). We concluded that (i) laparoscopic hiatoplasty and fundoplication does not significantly change the esophageal anteroposterior angle; and (ii) de novo dysphagia is not with the esophageal anteroposterior angle.