Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Research Articles

Impact of Language Congruence on Patient Outcomes Following Gastrostomy Tube Insertion.

Inadequate health literacy poses a significant public health challenge, influencing patient treatment adherence and outcomes. This study explores outcomes in the setting of language congruence at the time of discharge for pediatric patients following laparoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion. We conducted a retrospective chart review from 2019 to 2022 at a community children's hospital, including 168 patients categorized based on language congruence. Although trends did suggest increased ER visits among Spanish-speaking patients, there were no statistically significant differences in health care utilization or patient outcomes identified. Further larger studies are needed for a comprehensive analysis of the relationship of language congruence at discharge on outcomes following surgical procedures as this may enable delivery of culturally competent medical care.

Modifiable Preoperative Risk Factors to Mitigate Postoperative Site Infection Following Pediatric Gastrostomy

PurposeThere are limited studies assessing modifiable preoperative risk factors for pediatric laparoscopic gastrostomy tubes (LGT) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. We sought to evaluate the effect of demographics and surgical/infectious history on the superficial infection rate following gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. MethodsAfter IRB approval, we conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2021 of pediatric patients undergoing LGT or PEG tube. The primary outcome was cellulitis or abscess formation within 30-days and 90-days postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with t-tests, Chi-squared, and logistic regression(p ≤ 0.05). ResultsThere were 382 patients, with 181 (47%) LGT and 201 (53%) PEGs. LGT patients were younger (5.9 vs. 12.3 months, p < 0.001) and more likely to be admitted to the neonatal or cardiac intensive care unit prior to their GT. There were similar rates of prior surgical intervention (58% vs. 66%, p = 0.29) and previous infection (37% vs. 38%, p = 0.87) in both LGT and PEG patients. Within 30-days postoperatively, LGT patients had a higher superficial infection rate (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.04). On multivariate regression, Black race (Odds Ratio 0.10, p = 0.03) was protective and prior Staphylococcus colonization (OR 2.35, p = 0.04) increased the odds of infection. In those patients colonized with Staphylococcus, 21% developed a superficial site infection compared to 9% in those not colonized (p = 0.01). ConclusionThese data suggest prior Staphylococcus colonization is a significant risk factor for superficial infection following GT. Further work into preoperative decolonization strategies may provide an avenue to decrease the high infection rate in this common pediatric procedure. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

How Many Operative Performance Ratings Does a Pediatric Surgery Fellow Need to Be Deemed Practice Ready?

PurposeIdentifying the number of cases required for a fellow to achieve competence has been challenging. Workplace-based assessment (WBA) systems make collecting performance data practical and create the opportunity to translate WBA ratings into probabilistic statements about a fellow's likelihood of performing to a given standard on a subsequent assessment opportunity. MethodsWe compared data from two pediatric surgery training programs that used the performance rating scale from the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL). We used a Bayesian generalized linear mixed effects model to examine the relationship past and future performance for three procedures: Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement, and Pyloromyotomy. ResultsFor site one, 26 faculty assessed 9 fellows on 16 procedures yielding 1094 ratings, of which 778 (71%) earned practice-ready ratings. For site two, 25 faculty rated 3 fellows on 4 unique procedures yielding 234 ratings of which 151 (65%) were deemed practice-ready. We identified similar model-based future performance expectations, with prior practice-ready ratings having a similar average effect across both sites (Site one, B = 0.25; Site two, B = 0.25). Similar prior practice-ready ratings were needed for Laparoscopic G-Tube Placement (Site one = 13; Site two = 14), while greater differences were observed for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair (Site one = 10; Site two = 15) and Pyloromyotomy (Site one = 10; Site two = 15). ConclusionOur approach to modeling operative performance data is effective at determining future practice readiness of pediatric surgery fellows across multiple faculty and fellow groups. This method could be used to establish minimum case number requirements. Type of StudyOriginal manuscript, Study of Diagnostic Test. Level of EvidenceII.

Operating Room Recycling: Opportunities to Reduce Carbon Emissions Without Increases in Cost

BackgroundThe healthcare industry is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Within the hospital, operating rooms are responsible for the largest proportion of emissions due to high resource utilization and waste generation. Our aim was to generate estimates of greenhouse gas emissions avoided and cost implications following implementation of a recycling program across operating rooms at our freestanding children's hospital. MethodsData were collected from three commonly performed pediatric surgical procedures: circumcision, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, and laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Five cases of each procedure were observed. Recyclable paper and plastic waste was weighed. Emission equivalencies were determined using the Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. Institutional cost of waste disposal was $66.25 United States Dollars (USD)/ton for recyclable waste and $67.00 USD/ton for solid waste. ResultsThe proportion of recyclable waste ranged from 23.3% for circumcision to 29.5% for laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. The amount of waste redirected from landfill to a recycling stream could result in annual avoidance of 58,500 to 91,500 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, or 6583 to 10,296 gallons of gasoline. Establishing a recycling program would not require additional cost and could lead to modest cost savings (range $15 to 24 USD/year). ConclusionsIncorporation of recycling into operating rooms has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without increased cost. Clinicians and hospital administrators should consider operating room recycling programs as they work towards improved environmental stewardship. Level of EvidenceLevel VI – evidence form a single descriptive or qualitative study.

Outcomes of endoscopic percutaneous suture lateralization for neonatal and infantal bilateral vocal ford paralysis.

Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis (BVFP) is a rare but significant resource of respiratory distress in neonates and infants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and functional outcomes of Endoscopic Percutaneous Suture Lateralization (EPSL) for the treatment of BVFP in neonates and infants. A case series study of nine patients undergoing EPSL for BVFP between January 2019 and June 2021 was conducted. All patients were candidates for tracheostomy prior to EPSL. Demographic features including gender, age at diagnosis and surgery, main symptoms, airway comorbidities, airway support, and etiology were collected preoperatively. Patients were evaluated for breathing, swallowing and phonation postoperatively. Surgical success was defined as the ability to avoid tracheostomy. Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was conducted to identify aspiration. Voice evaluation was based on clinical observation. Nine patients underwent ten EPSL procedures (one in the left vocal fold, and nine in the right vocal fold). Eight patients (8/9) were able to successfully avoid tracheostomy and feed orally without aspiration after the procedure. One patient experienced clinical improvement in respiratory support requirements and underwent laparoscopic nissen and gastrostomy tube placement. At the last follow-up, two patients regained normal voice, two patients had mild dysphonia, and five patients had moderate dysphonia. Five patients showed partial return of the contralateral vocal fold function. EPSL is an effective and safe treatment for neonatal and infantal BVFP, which enables patients free from tracheostomy without significant impact on swallowing function or phonation. Level 4.

Airway Management of a Patient With Tracheoesophageal Fistula and Tracheal Stent

A 69-year-old male patient, a known case of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus on palliative care and Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) status, presented for urgent laparoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion under general anesthesia. The patient had developed an iatrogenic tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) because of the tracheal stent, which was placed for tracheal stenosis. A preoperative assessment was done, and a plan of airway management via one-lung ventilation (OLV) through an endobronchial tube was devised by the anesthesia team and discussed with the surgery team. The airway was secured via asleep fiberoptic right endobronchial intubation using a microlaryngeal tube (MLT) size 6 since there was uncertainty regarding adequate patency of the airway due to the invasion by the tumor and the presence of the stent. The patient remained hemodynamically stable. After surgical incision and insufflation of CO2 in the abdominal cavity, the patient's airway pressures were increased and we were unable to deliver adequate tidal volumes. Surgery was stopped; the presence of a kink in the circuit or endotracheal tube (ETT), the possibility of laryngospasm/bronchospasm, and pneumothorax were ruled out. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) revealed that the endobronchial tube was abutting the secondary carina. We pulled the MLT by 2 cm. The rest of the procedure was uneventful and we extubated the patient at the end of the procedure under vision using a fiber optic bronchoscope. The patient was discharged after two days of stay in the hospital. Our patient with TEF and tracheal stent posed a significant challenge for airway management. A thorough plan was drawn up and a team briefing was done. Perioperatively, the difficulty in ventilation was identified, and various other etiologies were ruled out with the successful identification and management of the problem.

The Abdominal Wall Factor: Impact of Surgical Technique in Feeding Access in the Obese Population

INTRODUCTION: Surgical feeding access is necessary in long-term care of patients. Although high complication rates have been documented, modification of operative technique to minimize complication has not been described. We sought to document complication rate of surgical feeding access and identify contributing factors. We hypothesized that in obese patients, laparoscopic gastrostomy tubes (LapG) would confer fewer complications than percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (PEG). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all surgical feeding access cases performed by the ACS service from September 1, 2012, to June 30, 2021. Patient demographics, hospitalization metrics, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Feeding access accounted for 14% of cases performed by the ACS service and represented 21% of 30-day mortalities. There were 133 complications associated with these procedures, with no difference between trauma and emergency general surgery populations (6.8% vs 5.7%, p = 0.44). Patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 had a higher incidence of complications including tube migration requiring operation (4.6% vs 2.5%, p = 0.03). This association held true in PEG patients (4.8% vs 2.2%, p = 0.03), but not in LapG patients (2.4% vs 2.6%, p = 0.87). CONCLUSION: Complications from feeding access has been studied, but this is the first to determine thresholds for changes in operative approach. ACS surgeons should consider LapG over PEG to minimize complication risk in patients with BMI >30 kg/m2. We must tailor our operative technique to the patient populations we care for instead of using a “one-size fits all” approach. If surgeons are tasked feeding access procedures to facilitate patient throughput, we must mitigate potential complications instead of accepting their inevitability.

Evaluating caretaker satisfaction with same‐day discharge after gastrostomy tube placement

BackgroundSame-day discharge (SDD) after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement, using written and video-based preoperative education, has been our standard institutional practice since 2017. We aim to evaluate caretaker satisfaction with this protocol. MethodsAll patients planned for SDD after G-tube placement from February 2021-February 2022 were identified. Chart review was performed to identify demographic information, successful same-day discharge or reason for postoperative admission, time to first postoperative feed, length of stay (LOS), and complications requiring emergency department evaluation, readmission, or reoperation. Telephone follow-up at two weeks postoperatively was conducted to evaluate satisfaction with the SDD protocol. ResultsForty-nine patients were eligible for SDD with a median age of 1.1 years [0.7, 4.4]. Forty-two (86%) patients were successfully discharged the same day with a median LOS of 7.5 h [6.7, 8.1], and 7 (14%) were admitted postoperatively for further education or emesis with a median LOS of 30.4 h [26.9, 31.2]. Median time to initiation of feeds was 2.3 h [1.7, 2.9]. 8 (16%) patients were evaluated in the emergency department within 30 days postoperatively, resulting in two re-admissions: one for peri‑stomal erythema and fever requiring oral antibiotics at 21 days and one for G-tube dislodgement requiring reoperation and replacement at 28 days. On two-week telephone follow-up, 42 caretakers (100%) felt that their education was adequate for same-day discharge and felt comfortable with the same-day discharge protocol. Six (14%) caretakers stated their child's pain was not well controlled at some point between discharge and survey follow-up, and three caretakers (7%) called a provider within the first 24 h for issues with pain. Forty-one caretakers (98%) expressed satisfaction going home the day of surgery. ConclusionCaretaker satisfaction and comfort with same-day discharge following laparoscopic G-tube placement are high, ascribed to comprehensive preoperative education and anticipatory guidance. Type of studyPrognostic. Level of evidenceLevel 1.

When Is It Safe to Feed After Surgical Feeding Tube Placement? A Survey of EASTMembers.

Many critically ill trauma and surgical patients require nutritional support. Patients needing long-term enteral access often undergo placement of surgical feeding tubes, including percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube, laparoscopic gastrostomy tube, and open gastrostomy tube. This study was performed to determine national practice patterns for feeding after feeding tube placement. A 16-question online survey was administered to members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma via Qualtrics about feeding practices after placement of the feeding tube. Questions included demographics, training, current practice, annual procedural volume, timing to resume feeds: <2, 6, 12, or 24h, methods to advance feeds, and reasons behind management decisions. For comparison, responses were grouped into "early" (≤6h) and "late" (18-24h) groups. The chi-square test was used, and P<0.05 was significant. Five hundred sixteen Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma members completed the survey. Most (95%) respondents worked at a level 1 or 2 trauma center, and 68% are in academic practice. The most common feeding tube placement was percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (median = 25/y, interquartile range = 15-40). Responses showed variability in timing of when feeds were resumed after procedure. Early feeding was not affected by age (≤42y), trauma center designation, volume, or training programs at the respondent's hospital. Graduates of surgical critical care fellowship were less likely to feed early (P=0.043). There is wide variability in feeding practices after surgical feeding tube placement. Given the large quantity of procedures performed, a randomized controlled trial should be performed to determine the optimal timing to resume feeds in critically ill patients.

Ultrasound-Guided Gastrostomy Tube Placement: An Evaluation of Postoperative Complications in the Pediatric Population.

Background: Using ultrasound guidance has been demonstrated as a feasible alternative method for gastrostomy tube placement in the pediatric population. The aim of this study is to evaluate short- and long-term postoperative complications after ultrasound-guided gastrostomy tube placement (USGTP) and to compare them with complications after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement (LGTP). Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent USGTP (n = 41) and LGTP (n = 120) at the same institution. Comparisons were made between the two groups in the context of demographics as well as 30-day and 6-month postoperative complications. A phone survey (n = 26) further identified USGTP complications potentially not captured in the electronic medical records. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, and indication for procedure between the two groups. Chart review revealed that USGTP and LGTP had statistically comparable rates of emergency department (ED) visits for postoperative complications. Among USGTP patients, 8% had a recorded ED visit within 30 days of the operation and 13% presented to the ED within 6 months, compared with 6% and 11%, respectively, in the LGTP group (P = .65, P = .69). The USGTP phone survey reported total complications over an average postoperative follow-up time of 34.6 months (range 8-87) and revealed a total ED visit rate of 35%, which is comparable with rates reported in the literature for minimally invasive feeding tube placement. Conclusion: USGTP is a safe and feasible alternative option for gastrostomy tube placement in the pediatric population and it has postoperative complication rates that are comparable with LGTP.

Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Infants During an Open Abdominal Procedure: A Novel Approach.

Introduction: Infants with intra-abdominal pathology necessitating open abdominal surgery may also require placement of a gastrostomy tube (GT). Use of laparoscopy provides better visualization for gastrostomy placement and lowers the risk of complications compared with an open approach. We describe a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic GT placement at the time of an open abdominal procedure. Methods: All patients who underwent an open abdominal procedure with concurrent laparoscopic gastrostomy from January 2010 to June 2020 were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were performed with categorical variables reported as proportions and continuous variables reported as medians with interquartile range [IQR]. Results: Twelve patients were included; 8 (67.5%) were male. The median age at time of surgery was 10 weeks [IQR 6, 14], with a median weight of 4.1 kg [IQR 3.4, 4.8]. Ten patients had the laparoscope placed through the open incision, whereas 2 had the laparoscope placed through a separate incision. Median operative time was 106 minutes [IQR 80, 125]. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications included surgical site infection in 5 (41.7%), leaking around the GT in 3 (25%), and malfunction of the tube in 1 (8.3%). One patient required reoperation 28 days postoperatively due to malfunction. Conclusion: Laparoscopic GT can be safely performed at the time of an open abdominal procedure, and frequently through the same incision, harnessing the benefits of a laparoscopic approach even when an open incision is needed.

Modified laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in children: Does subcutaneous suture type matter?

Laparoscopic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement carries the risk of early tube dislodgement and is often modified with absorbable subcutaneously-tunneled transabdominal tacking sutures that can aid in tube replacement. However, these buried sutures may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This study sought to evaluate SSI rates associated with different types of transabdominal tacking sutures used in modified laparoscopic GT placement. A single-institution, retrospective review was performed of all patients ≤18 years-old undergoing modified laparoscopic GT placement between September 2016 and March 2020. Patients were stratified into three groups by suture type used, and the primary outcome was SSI within six weeks of surgery. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed by chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A total of 113 modified laparoscopic GT placements were performed at a median age of 9 months (interquartile range 3 months to 3 years). Prophylactic antibiotic use was similar between groups. Eleven patients (10%) developed an SSI, and all were treated with antibiotics alone. No SSIs were observed with the use of poliglecaprone suture (n=46), and higher SSI rates were observed with use of polyglactin (n=17) and polydioxanone (n=51) suture (18% polyglactin vs. 16% polydioxanone vs. 0% poliglecaprone, p<0.05). No differences were observed in rates of early postoperative dislodgement, leakage, or granulation tissue. Absorbable braided and long-lasting monofilament transabdominal tacking sutures may increase risk of SSI following modified laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. In this cohort, the use of poliglecaprone (Monocryl) suture was associated with no SSIs and similar rates of postoperative dislodgement, leakage, and granulation tissue. Treatment Study, Level III.

Surgical Site Infection in Children with Neuromuscular Disorders after Laparoscopic Gastrostomy: A Propensity-Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics Database Analysis.

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that children with neuromuscular scoliosis have a higher incidence of infection after spine surgery. The purpose of the study is to determine whether children with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) have higher rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) or increased hospital length of stay (LOS) compared with children without NMDs following laparoscopic gastrostomy creation, a common pediatric general surgery operation. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of laparoscopic gastrostomy creation in children from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics database (NSQIP-P) 2018-2019. Patients were stratified based on NMD status. We performed multivariable logistic regression and ordered logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio of superficial SSI within 30 days of surgery and increased LOS. Results: We screened 252,367 patients from the NSQIP-P 2018-2019 dataset. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and 1:1 propensity score-matching, there were 991 children with NMDs and 991 children without NMDs. Children with NMDs had higher prevalence of superficial SSI within 30 days of gastrostomy creation: 36 (3.63%) versus 18 (1.82%); p = 0.013. Children with NMDs had increased odds of having a superficial SSI within 30 days of laparoscopic gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement compared with children without NMD (odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.58; p = 0.018). There was no difference in LOS based on NMD status. Conclusion: Children with NMDs have two-fold increased odds of superficial SSI after laparoscopic gastrostomy creation compared with children without NMDs. Children with NMDs should be the aim of targeted quality improvement initiatives to reduce infection risks.

Laparoscopic gastrostomy in a patient with asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy (ATD), also known as Jeune syndrome, is an autosomal recessive disease which causes thoracic insufficiency. Complications and life expectancy vary based on specific mutations. Infants with this condition may require operative feeding access in addition to surgery for other associated anomalies. No prior cases of laparoscopic surgery in ATD have been recorded in the literature. This case demonstrates that with proper technique, laparoscopic surgery can be accomplished safely. Newborn diagnosed with ATD prenatally with anatomical 20-week ultrasound who required long term enteral feeding access due to inability to tolerate oral feeds secondary to tachypnea. Patient underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement at 2 weeks of age. This was well tolerated, and no complications arose from insufflation pressure despite small thoracic volumes. Pressure control ventilation was used along with frequent desufflation breaks. Patient tolerated tube feeds at goal until expiration at 8 weeks of age. Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed in patients with ATD with appropriate monitoring and ventilatory support. Although ATD is commonly fatal, this type of palliative surgery can improve patients’ quality of life and allow them to discharge home safely so they can spend more time with family.

Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Less Complications Associated with Laparoscopic Approach.

Background: There are few nationwide studies comparing outcomes of open, laparoscopic (LAP), and percutaneous endoscopic (PEG) gastrostomy tube (GT) placement in the pediatric population. Materials and Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014 was used to identify patients ≤18 years (excluding newborns) who underwent GT placement. Demographics, hospital characteristics, and outcomes were compared by the GT approach. Results: There were 3278 patients (41% female, age 3 ± 5 years) identified who underwent GT placement (40% open versus 32% PEG versus 28% LAP). Following an open approach, there were higher rates of GT-related complications (10% versus 4% LAP versus 3% PEG) and postoperative gastrointestinal issues (24% versus 12% LAP versus 9% PEG) on index hospitalization, both P < .001. Readmission within 30 days and 1 year were 18% and 43%, respectively. Overall readmission rates were not affected by the GT approach (44% open versus 44% LAP versus 43% PEG, P = .773). However, readmission for GT-related complications was the lowest following the LAP approach (<0.3% versus 2% open versus 2% PEG, P < .001). When those who also underwent fundoplication were excluded, conversion to gastrojejunostomy or jejunostomy (GJ/J) on readmission was higher following open and PEG approaches (4% open versus 2% PEG versus 0% LAP, P = .039). Conclusions: Compared with PEG gastrostomy and open gastrostomy, LAP GT placement appears to have lower index complications and reoperation rates, and at least comparable readmission outcomes. Despite these advantages, LAP GT placement remains underutilized.

The Paired T-Fastener Technique: A Bolster-Free Gastropexy for Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement.

Purpose: Gastropexy during laparoscopic gastrostomy tube (GT) insertion can be technically challenging. T-fasteners are an effective method of gastropexy. However, the use of external bolsters requires an additional procedure for removal and may cause skin complications due to pressure necrosis. We describe our experience utilizing T-fasteners in a novel way that eliminates external bolsters during laparoscopic GT placement. Methods: Pediatric patients requiring enteral access who underwent gastrostomy at a single institution using the paired T-fastener technique were reviewed. Gastropexy was achieved by passing pairs of T-fasteners, under laparoscopic and/or endoscopic guidance, through single stab incisions into the stomach in a square configuration, allowing the suture from one T-fastener to be tied subcutaneously to its paired suture. This eliminates the need for external bolsters. Operative time and 30-day postoperative complications, including local wound infection, granulation tissue formation, bleeding, and tube replacement, are reported. Results: Thirty patients underwent gastrostomy placement using the paired T-fastener technique. Mean age was 9.2 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.9) and mean weight 29.9 kg (SD 21.0). Mean tube length was 2.2 cm (SD 0.71). Eight patients underwent an additional procedure at the time of gastrostomy. Mean operative time was 74.4 minutes (SD 39.7). Five patients developed a local wound infection requiring antibiotics. Five developed granulation tissue. Seven patients underwent tube replacement within 30 days for dislodgment or stem upsize. Conclusion: The paired T-fastener technique is a safe and efficient method for primary button gastrostomy placement. This method eliminates the need for additional trocars or external bolsters and may be helpful in patients with thick abdominal walls.

A Retrospective Review of Primary Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement.

The laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy tube placement (LAP) has increasingly become the preferred method for placing gastrostomy tubes in infants and children. The goal of this retrospective review was to examine our institutional experiences with our transition from the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedure to LAP technique. All patients undergoing primary PEG or LAP gastrostomy at Boston Children's Hospital between January 2010 and June 2015 were identified. The primary aim was to compare complication rates within the first 6 months after tube placement; differences in total hospital procedural costs, hospital resource utilization, and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease were examined. Nine hundred and eighty-seven patients (442 PEG and 545 LAP gastrostomy tubes) were included. No differences in total complications within 6 months were seen. Patients undergoing PEG placement had more gastrostomy-related complications (PEG 30 [6.7%] vs LAP 13 [2.4%], P = 0.0007) and cellulitis (PEG 23 [5.1%] vs LAP 2 [0.4%], P = 0.03) within the first week of placement. Patients undergoing LAP procedures had more granulation tissue episodes (PEG 19 [4.4%] vs LAP 107 [19.8%], P = 0.005). No differences in emergency room visits, hospital readmissions, or postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease were seen, although transition to a gastrojejunal tube was higher in patients undergoing LAP procedure (PEG 20 patients [4.6%] vs LAP 51 patients [9.5%], P = 0.0008). Total complications were similar between patients undergoing PEG versus LAP gastrostomy tube placement. Patients with the PEG procedure had more complications within the first week of placement versus patients with the LAP procedure had more granulation skin complications.

Focus on the totally laparoscopic feeding gastrostomy tube placement operative technique

Laparoscopic feeding gastrostomy placement is a surgical operation that allows the feeding of malnourished patients through a tube that is placed in the gastric lumen. The benefits of an improved nutritional status in terms of improving clinical outcomes are well documented in the literature and consist in a reduction of the complication rates of the surgical patients, the length of hospital stay, the readmission rates, and a reduction of the cost of health services by reducing the morbidity or mortality. We present a totally laparoscopic technique of feeding tube placement.

Focus on the totally laparoscopic feeding gastrostomy tube placement operative technique

Focus on the totally laparoscopic feeding gastrostomy tube placement operative technique

Concomitant gastrostomy tube insertion during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease: analysis of risk factors for fundoplication failure.

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication(LNF) and gastrostomy tube (GT) placement may be performed concomitantly in children with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and failure to thrive. We aimed to evaluate the rate and risk factors for LNF failure in children undergoing concomitant LNF/GT. A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study was conducted, reviewing patients that underwent LNF (2005-2014). Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, and type of GT (laparoscopy- or endoscopy-assisted). The primary outcome measure was LNF failure. Data was compared using contingency tables or Mann-Whitney tests, when appropriate. An exploratory analysis by Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine predictors of time to LNF failure after LNF/GT. Of 189 children that underwent LNF, 99 (52%) had a concomitant GT (55% laparoscopy-, 45% endoscopy-assisted). LNF failed in 15% after LNF/GT and in 17% after LNF alone (p = 0.84), at a median age of 23months (IQR 8-41). Using univariate analysis, we found that a younger age at the time of surgery (p = 0.05), prematurity (p = 0.0018), esophageal atresia (p = 0.01), and endoscopy-assisted GT (p = 0.02) were potential predictors of LNF failure after LNF/GT. After multivariate regression analysis, prematurity (p = 0.007) remained significantly associated with LNF failure after LNF/GT. No predictive factors for LNF failure after LNF alone were identified. Concomitant GT insertion and LNF is a common practice, as half of the children that undergo LNF also received GT insertion. Children born preterm or with esophageal atresia comprise a fragile population at high-risk of LNF failure after LNF/GT. Prospective, multicentric studies are needed to evaluate the best GT technique to use in children undergoing LNF.