Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Research Articles

Routine single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with concomitant cholecystectomy for elderly patients: a 6-year retrospective comparative study.

While single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has gained more popularity in recent years, its application to elderly patients needs further evaluation. Few SILC studies regarded this rapidly growing vulnerable population, and single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (SILCBDE) was never mentioned. We conducted an observational study of 146 routine SILCBDE to address this issue. One hundred forty-six consecutive patients underwent SILCBDE with concomitant cholecystectomies during a period of 6 years (July 2012-June 2016 and July 2018-July 2020). Forty patients with an age of 65years or older were the study target. Characteristics and operative outcomes were compared with the remaining 106 younger patients by retrospective chart review. The primary outcomes include complications and mortality, while the secondary outcomes contain intraoperative blood loss, operative time, procedural conversions, postoperative length of hospital stay, and bile duct stone recurrence. There was no mortality. The bile duct stone clearance rate was 98.6%. The elderly group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, higher comorbidity rate, higher acute cholangitis rate, lower completion intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) rate, longer operative time, more blood loss, longer postoperative hospital stay (p < .001), longer total hospital stay (p < .001), higher procedural conversion rate (p < .05), higher complication rate (p < .001), and the exclusive open conversion (2.5%). The difference in complications derived from Clavien-Dindo grade I. Routine SILCBDE with concomitant cholecystectomy by experienced surgeons is safe and efficacious for elderly patients as for younger patients. Randomized controlled trials are anticipated.

Structured learning and mentoring: shortening the learning curve in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Technological advances have made the laparoscopy procedure popular for simultaneous cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration. We aimed to assess the implementation of a structured mentorship program for training in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). We explored the effectiveness thereof in facilitating the learning of LCBDE as a single-stage treatment of common bile duct stones (CBD) with gallbladder in situ. The surgical databases of a mentor (experienced in LCBDE) and a mentee (new to LCBDE) were analyzed. The analysis retrospectively compared the mentor's first 100 cases (MF) with the mentee's first 100 (MEF) cases, and the mentor's last 100 cases (ML) with the mentee's initial cases. Data included demographics, technical details, and postoperative outcomes. A total of 300 patients underwent LCBDE. For MF vs. MEF (both n = 100), MF had a lower transcystic approach rate (5% vs. 70%; p < 0.001) than MEF. Postoperative median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MEF group compared to the MF group (2 vs 5, p < 0.001). No mortality or significant complications were observed in either group. For ML (n = 100) vs. MEF, the ML group had a higher transcystic rate (87% vs. 70%; p = 0.005). No differences in mortality or conversion were observed between the groups. Bile leak was lower in the ML (3% vs. 6%, p = 0.498) group than the MEF group. Postoperative median hospital stay did not significantly differ between the ML and MEF group (1 vs 2days, p = 0.952). Structured mentorship significantly influenced the successful adoption of LCBDE by the mentee, shortening the learning curve to provide outcomes in the first 100 cases, comparable to highly experienced centers. These results support the implementation of structured training and continuous mentoring to facilitate the learning curve of laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration after previous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: minimally invasive surgery technique.

Laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration after previous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: minimally invasive surgery technique.

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Pregnant Female: A Case Report

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Pregnant Female: A Case Report

ThP3.14 - Four-Year Experience of Laparoscopic Transcystic common bile duct exploration at a District Hospital

Abstract Aim This study aims to assess the outcomes of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) as a single-stage procedure for symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Methods In this retrospective analysis we included 87 patients with high suspicion of common bile duct (CBD) stones, imaging proven choledocholithiasis or failed Endoscopic Retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). These patients underwent either LCBDE or CBD exploration under fluoroscopy between 2019 and 2023. Results Among the 87 patients selected for a single stage procedure, 59 underwent Laparoscopic transcystic CBDE. Successful CBDE was achieved in 40 cases (68%), with four patients after failed ERCP. In one case on table ERCP with rendez-vous technique was used to complete CBD clearance. Two of them needed complementary post operative ERCP to remove impacted stones. Most cases with unsuccessful CBDE, 19 in total (32%), was due to difficult cannulation of a narrow cystic duct. Three were managed with on table ERCP and five had post-operative ERCP. Six patients (7%) experienced unplanned readmissions, three with retained stones post-successful stone clearance and two after clear on table cholangiogram, who were managed with ERCP. Bile leak occurred in two cases and it was self-limited within 14 days. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 5,3 days with a median LOS of 4 days. Conclusion Transcystic LCBDE, when surgical expertise and experience are available, is an effective and safe procedure for treating choledocholithiasis, providing comprehensive CBD clearance while avoiding the risks associated with ERCP.

ThP5.5 - Outcomes Of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration And Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Single Centre Review From A District General Hospital In Northern Ireland

Abstract Aim Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is a one-stage therapeutic option for patients presenting with choledocholithiasis. This is a review of outcomes for patients who underwent this procedure in a district general hospital setting in Northern Ireland over a two-year period. Method This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data concerning all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration between October 2021 and October 2023. Data were reviewed to include pre-operative liver function, pre-operative imaging, rate of conversion to open procedure, length of stay, and readmission rate due to complications. Results 106 patients were included in the review. The average length of stay was 2.7 days (with a median of 1 day) and readmission rate was 7.5%. 87.7% of patients had deranged liver function tests on the morning of surgery, and 100% had proven choledocholithiasis on cross-sectional imaging prior to proceeding to theatre. Only two patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy. No patients developed postoperative pancreatitis. The complication rate was 11.3%, with most complications being of Clavien-Dindo Grade I or II. Conclusions Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents a safe and effective method for management of choledocholithiasis. It can be considered as an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a therapeutic option in an appropriately selected patient group.

ThP4.10 - Outcomes of Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration at the time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in patients with small common bile duct diameter

Abstract Aim Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LC+LCBDE) is a single stage therapeutic option for management of choledocholithiasis. There have been limited publications regarding the feasibility of transcystic LCBDE in patients with small (≤8mm) common bile ducts (CBD). This study seeks to examine the outcomes for patients with small ducts who underwent LC+LCBDE via a transcystic approach in a district general hospital over a two-year period. Methods Prospectively collected data regarding all patients who underwent LC+LCBDE over a period from January 2022 to December 2023 was retrospectively reviewed. Data concerning indication for surgery, CBD diameter, length of stay, complication rate, and readmission rate were determined from Electronic Care Records. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results 50 patients were identified. CBD diameter (as measured at pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography [MRCP]) ranged from 3.5mm to 8mm (average 6.25mm). One patient required conversion to open surgery due to difficulties with the LC element of the operation. Median postoperative length of stay was 1 day (range 0-8 days) and readmission rate was 6%. One patient experienced a complication beyond Clavien-Dindo Grade 2, this caused by a superficial wound infection requiring washout under general anaesthetic. One patient required subsequent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for management of retained CBD stones. Conclusions LC+LCBDE is a safe and effective management option for patients in the setting of choledocholithiasis with small common bile duct diameter. Small CBD should not necessarily be a deterrent to consideration of LCBDE as a therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients.

ThP3.15 - Trends in ERCP in a new city teaching hospital; is there a learning curve for a unit?

Abstract Aims Describe trends in volume, demographics, and complications over time for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in a new endoscopy unit. Methods Prospective recording of all ERCPs in a new city teaching hospital commenced when the unit opened in 2015. This registry recorded patient demographics, indications, procedural data and complications. We analysed annual trends over time using linear regression. Results 4504 ERCPs were performed during the study period (1/6/15-31/5/23), with a female predominance of 58%. Median age (70 years, interquartile range 59-80) was unchanged over the study period, however the proportion under 30 years had decreased over time (4%-1%, slope -0.93, p=0.042). Total number of procedures per year has decreased over time (peak 628 in 2016, falling to 438 in 2022). The proportion performed for stone disease has fallen over the study period (80%-71%, slope -0.07, p=&amp;lt;0.001). Though not a statistically significant difference, the rate of ERCP pancreatitis has had a clinically significant decrease over time (5.4%-3.9%, slope -0.033, p=0.32). Conclusion A number of changes in practice have occurred since three units were merged into one unit. We routinely give diclofenac and IV fluids post-procedure. We now preferentially treat younger stone patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration. This results in an evolving use of contemporary ERCP with an older patient cohort with an increased indication of cancer and other reasons and fewer total numbers. These factors will contribute to a lower incidence of pancreatitis post-procedure but cannot discount a learning curve effect for a new unit.

ThP5.10 - Post ERCP Pancreatitis at a Tertiary Center - A Retrospective Incidence and Causal Analysis

Abstract Background Incidence of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis (PEP) varies between 3.5% and 9.7% as per the 2014 meta-analyses. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence, perform a causal analysis and gauge the financial implications of PEP in our hospital for general surgical patients to help optimise the utilisation of resources. Methods All General Surgical patients who had ERCP between 01/10/2022 and 31/03/2023 were included in the analysis. A successful ERCP was defined as cannulation of the biliary tree. The digital patient records were analysed and collected onto a master datasheet. They were divided into PEP and non-PEP groups. Results A total of 131/155 attempted ERCPs were successful. Of these 131, 13 (9.92%) developed PEP. Females were predominantly affected. Three out of six patients (50%) undergoing ERCP for malignant biliary obstructions developed PEP. Elective ERCPs (15% vs 6.5%) and higher mean bilirubin levels &amp;gt;= 134.92 µmol/L posed a greater risk of developing PEP (p-value=0.021). The mean hospital stay was 3.5 days longer (2-49 days) in the PEP group. The total extra cost to the NHS ranged from £20,475 - £35,763 over 6 months. Conclusion Patients with gallstone disease should receive prompt cholecystectomy in adherence to NICE guidelines to reduce the risk of gallstone-related problems and ERCP need. This in turn would lead to a reduction in PEP and positively affect the financial implications on the NHS. We also recommend a randomised control trial for patients with grossly deranged liver function tests to compare ERCP with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct explorations combined.

Double-Needle Bidirectional Barbed Wire Continuous Layered Suture Technique for Laparoscopic Stage I Common Bile Duct Surgery.

Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) proves a safe and effective treatment for choledochal stones. After LCBDE, preferred choledochal closure is favored for short- and long-term outcomes compared with t-tube drainage. However, there are no relevant studies on the technique of layered closure of the common bile duct with double-needle bidirectional barbed suture at home and abroad. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy from January 2021 to October 2023 in our hospital was performed. A continuous layered one-stage suture using two-needle bidirectional barb wire. The primary outcomes were stone clearance, operative time, blood loss, and complications. Secondary outcomes were complications, length of hospitalization, and time to drain removal. Results: During the study period, laparoscopic surgery was successful in all cases, and the initial stones were removed without complications. Conclusion: The treatment of choledocholithiasis with continuous layered one-stage suture with double-needle bidirectional barbed wire after LCBDE is a new convenient and effective treatment in selected patients.

Moving the needle for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: defining obstacles for the path forward.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed very commonly but laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is performed infrequently. We aimed to determine the most significant barriers to performing LCBDE and to identify the highest yield interventions to facilitate adoption. A national survey was designed by content experts, who regularly perform LCBDE. The survey was distributed by email to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma memberships. Non-U.S. surgeon responses were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. Seven hundred twenty six practicing surgeons responded to the survey, 543 of which were US surgeons who perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Only 27% of respondents preferred to manage choledocholithiasis with LCBDE. Their technique of choice was choledochoscopy (70%). Despite this, 36% of surgeons did not have access to a choledochoscope or were unsure if they did. Seventy percent of surgeons who performed LCBDE did not have supplies readily available in a central stocking location. Only 8.5% of surgeons agreed that routine LCBDE would impact their referral relationship with gastroenterology. About half the respondents (47%) considered LCBDE worth the time, but only 25% knew about reimbursement for the procedure. Almost all (85%) of surgeons understood that LCBDE results in shorter length of stay compared to ERCP. Only a quarter of the surgeons performing cholecystectomy perform LCBDE. Multiple barriers contribute to low LCBDE utilization. Increasing availability of appropriate equipment, a dedicated supply cart, and teaching fluoroscopic LCBDE interventions may address limitations and increase adoption. These efforts may also increase efficiency, minimizing perceived time and skill restraints. Although many surgeons understand LCBDE decreases length of stay, they are unaware of surgeon-specific LCBDE financial benefits. Systematically addressing these barriers may increase LCBDE adoption, improve patient care, and decrease healthcare costs.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is an effective, safe, and less-costly method of treating choledocholithiasis.

Advancements in laparoscopic techniques led to the adoption of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) as an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for management of choledocholithiasis (CD). The goal of this study was to describe the initial experience at a safety net hospital with acute care surgeons performing LCBDE for suspected CD. We hypothesized LCBDE would reduce length of stay and hospital costs compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and ERCP performed in the same hospital admission. This was a retrospective case-control study from 2019 to 2023 comparing LCBDE to LC/ERCP among patients diagnosed with CD. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Data reported as median [interquartile range] or research subjects with condition (percentage). A total of 110 LCBDE were performed, while 121 subjects underwent LC and ERCP. Patients in the LCBDE group were more likely to be female with a total of 87 female subjects (77.6%) compared to 76 male subjects (62.8%) (95% CI 1.14-3.74). Initial WBC was lower in the LCBDE group at 8.4 [6.9-11.8] compared to the LC/ERCP group at 10.9 [7.9-13.5] (p = 0.0013). Remaining demographics and lab values were similar between the two groups. Patients who underwent LCBDE had a significantly shorter length of stay at 2days [1-3] compared to those in the LC/ERCP group at 4days [3-6] (p < 0.001). Hospital charges for the LCBDE group were $46,685 [$38,687-$56,703] compared to $60,537 [$47,527-$71,739] for the LC/ERCP group (p < 0.001). LCBDE is associated with significantly lower hospital costs and shorter length of stay with similar post-operative complication and 30-day readmission rates. Our results show that LCBDE is safe and should be considered as a first-line approach in the management of CD.

Multi-institutional Analysis of Choledocholithiasis in Pediatric vs Adult Patients

BackgroundIn adults, upfront intraoperative cholangiogram with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is well accepted for management of choledocholithiasis. Despite recent evidence supporting LCBDE utility in children, there has been hesitation to adopt this surgery first (SF) approach over ERCP first (EF) due to perceived technical challenges. We compared rates of successful stone clearance during LCBDE between adult and pediatric patients to evaluate if pediatric surgeons could anticipate similar rates of successful clearance. MethodsA multicenter, retrospective review of pediatric (<18 years) and adult patients with choledocholithiasis managed from 2018 to 2024 was performed. Demographic and clinical data were obtained. Rate of successful duct clearance with LCBDE was compared. Surgical and endoscopic complications (infections, bleeding, pancreatitis, bile leak) were also compared. Results724 patients, 333 (45.9%) pediatric and 391 (54.0%) adults, were included. The median age of pediatric vs adult patients was 15.2 years [13.1, 16.6] vs 55.5 years [34.1, 70.5], respectively. Of these, 201 (60.4%) pediatric vs 169 (43.2%) adult patients underwent SF, p < 0.001. LCBDE was attempted in 84 (41.7%) pediatric vs 140 (82.8%) adults, p = 0.002. LCBDE success was higher in pediatric vs adult patients (82.1% vs 71.4%, p = 0.004). Complications rates were similar however, pediatric patients who underwent EF had higher endoscopic complications (9.1% vs 3.6%, p = 0.03). ConclusionLCBDE is highly successful in children vs adults with no increased surgical complications. This data, coupled with the limited ERCP access for children, supports that LCBDE is an equally effective tool for managing choledocholithiasis in children as is accepted in adults. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Reducing MRCP Utilization Through a “Surgery First” Approach for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis: A CARES Working Group Retrospective Study

BackgroundCholedocholithiasis in children is rising and frequently managed with an endoscopy-first (EF) approach that utilizes endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a resource intensive modality that often precedes ERCP to gain further assurance of choledocholithiasis prior to intervention. MRCP can lead to a longer length of stay (LOS) and strain healthcare resources. We hypothesized that the use of MRCP is decreased with a surgery-first (SF) approach. MethodsThe Choledocholithiasis Alliance for Research, Education, and Surgery (CARES) Working Group conducted this retrospective study on pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. SF patients underwent LC + intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) ± laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Imaging studies included ultrasound (US), MRCP, and computed tomography (CT). ResultsFrom seven institutions, 357 pediatric patients were identified. The SF (n = 220) group received fewer imaging studies then EF (n = 137) (1.29 vs. 1.62; p < 0.05). US was more commonly employed and the number of US and CT scans was similar. The SF group had lower MRCP utilization than EF (29% vs. 59%; p < 0.05). EF patients that received an MRCP had the longest LOS (4.0 d [2.4, 6.3]) compared to SF that did not (1.9 d [1.2, 3.2]) (p < 0.05). ConclusionChildren with choledocholithiasis managed with an EF approach receive more diagnostic imaging, especially MRCP. While MRCP remains a powerful diagnostic tool, a surgery-first approach can minimize the resource utilization and LOS associated with magnetic resonance imaging. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

A Novel Taxonomy of Intraoperative Cholangiograms in Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Tool for Advancing Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Outcomes Research.

Cholangiography for visualization of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an important diagnostic roadmap in the context of suspected choledocholithiasis (CDL). The renewed interest in transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) necessitates a general description of the range of CDL presentations. Our aim was to establish a novel classification system of intraoperative cholangiograms (IOCs) to advance research efforts in this field. A novel cholangiogram classification system, featuring 8 distinct presentations of choledocholithiasis, was applied to a data set of 80 preintervention IOCs for suspected choledocholithiasis. The classification system is as follows: A (no common bile duct stones, duodenal filling present, and concern for air bubbles), B (no common bile duct stones, no duodenal filling, and concern for sludge), C1 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), C2 (stone(s) < 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), D1 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct with duodenal filling), D2 (stone(s) ≥ 2x size of cystic duct without duodenal filling), E1 (congenital anatomical variant and/or common duct stricture), and E2 (surgically altered biliary anatomy). Cholangiogram review yielded preintervention classifications for 6 of 8 variants (A-E): A (7.5%), B (3.75%), C1 (23.75%), C2 (42.5%), D1 (15%), and D2 (7.5%). Analysis of cystic duct diameter yielded no significant differences among classification groups, indicating no predominant pattern of cystic duct anatomy within a given classification. An IOC classification system for suspected choledocholithiasis is foundational to answering key clinical questions for transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus cholangioscopy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.

Currently, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the main treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis. However, the treatment is unsatisfactory, and the development of better therapies is needed. To determine the clinical efficacy of LC plus cholangioscopy for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis. Patients (n = 243) with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis admitted to The Affiliated Haixia Hospital of Huaqiao University (910th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force) between January 2019 and December 2023 were included in the study; 111 patients (control group) underwent ERCP + LC and 132 patients (observation group) underwent LC + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Surgical success rates, residual stone rates, complications (pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia, biliary tract infection, and bile leakage), surgical indicators [intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and operation time (OT)], recovery indices (postoperative exhaust/defecation time and hospital stay), and serum inflammatory markers [C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were compared. No significant differences in surgical success rates and residual stone rates were detected between the observation and control groups. However, the complication rate, IBL, OT, postoperative exhaust/defecation time, and hospital stays were significantly reduced in the observation group compared with the control group. Furthermore, CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6 Levels after treatment were reduced in the observation group compared with the levels in the control group. These results indicate that LC + LCBDE is safer than ERCP + LC for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis. The surgical risks and postoperative complications were lower in the observation group compared with the control group. Thus, patients may recover quickly with less inflammation after LCBDE.

The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration after prior gastrectomy.

The increased incidence of gallstones can be linked to previous gastrectomy (PG). However, the success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography after gastrectomy has significantly reduced. In such cases, laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) may be an alternative. In this study, LTCBDE was evaluated for its safety and feasibility in patients with PG. We retrospectively evaluated 300 patients who underwent LTCBDE between January 2015 and June 2023. The subjects were divided into 2 groups according to their PG status: PG group and No-PG group. The perioperative data from the 2 groups were compared. The operation time in the PG group was longer than that in the No-PG group (184.69 ± 20.28 minutes vs 152.19 ± 26.37 minutes, P < .01). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (61.19 ± 41.65 mL vs 50.83 ± 30.47 mL, P = .087), postoperative hospital stay (6.36 ± 1.94 days vs 5.94 ± 1.36 days, P = .125), total complication rate (18.6 % vs 14.1 %, P = .382), stone clearance rate (93.2 % vs 96.3 %, P = .303), stone recurrence rate (3.4 % vs 1.7 %, P = .395), and conversion rate (6.8 % vs 7.0 %, P = .941) between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred in either groups. A history of gastrectomy may not affect the feasibility and safety of LTCBDE, because its perioperative results are comparable to those of patients with a history of No-gastrectomy.

540 Outcomes of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; a Single Centre Review from a District General Hospital in Northern Ireland

Abstract Aim Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration is a one-stage therapeutic option for patients presenting with choledocholithiasis. This is a review of outcomes for patients who underwent this procedure in a district general hospital setting in Northern Ireland over a two-year period. Method This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data concerning all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration between October 2021 and October 2023. Data were reviewed to include pre-operative liver function, pre-operative imaging, rate of conversion to open procedure, length of stay, and readmission rate due to complications. Results 106 patients were included in the review. The average length of stay was 2.7 days (with a median of 1 day). 87.7% of patients had deranged liver function tests on the morning of surgery, and 100% had proven choledocholithiasis on cross-sectional imaging prior to proceeding to theatre. Only two patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy. No patients developed post-operative pancreatitis. The complication rate was 11.3%, with most complications being of Clavien-Dindo Grade I or II. The readmission rate was 7.5%. Conclusions Common bile duct exploration at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents a safe and effective method for management of choledocholithiasis. It can be considered as an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a therapeutic option in an appropriately selected patient group.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in a patient with situs inversus totalis: A case report

AbstractSitus inversus complicates diagnosis and treatment due to the mirrored organ placement in relation to normal anatomy. This report describes a 78‐year‐old female patient with situs inversus totalis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Utilizing the “French mirror technique” for port placement, the surgeon adeptly mirrored standard maneuvers with a 2‐mm needle forceps in the left hand and a 5‐mm forceps in the right in a reversed anatomical setting. This technique maintained familiar hand movements, despite the patient's unique anatomy. The surgeon applied transcystic ductal bile duct exploration, using choledochoscopy for duct exploration and a basket catheter for stone removal. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration through the transcystic ductal route are viable and effective for patients with situs inversus.

Surgical strategies for challenging common bile duct stones in the endoscopic era: A comprehensive review of current evidence.

While endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the primary treatment modality for common bile duct stones (CBDS) or choledocholithiasis due to advancements in instruments, surgical intervention, known as common bile duct exploration (CBDE), is still necessary in cases of difficult CBDS, failed endoscopic treatment, or altered anatomy. Recent evidence also supports CBDE in patients requesting single-step cholecystectomy and bile duct stone removal with comparable outcomes. This review elucidates relevant clinical anatomy, selection indications, and outcomes to enhance surgical understanding. The selection between trans-cystic (TC) vs trans-choledochal (TD) approaches is described, along with stone removal techniques and ductal closure. Detailed surgical techniques and strategies for both the TC and TD approaches, including instrument selection, is also provided. Additionally, this review comprehensively addresses operation-specific complications such as bile leakage, stricture, and entrapment, and focuses on preventive measures and treatment strategies. This review aims to optimize the management of CBDS through laparoscopic CBDE, with the goal of improving patient outcomes and minimizing risks.