Laparoscopic Colon Research Articles

Laparoscopic colon surgery: time to leave the urinary catheter in the operating room?

'Fast track' guidelines have incorporated multimodal measures to optimize perioperative outcomes in surgery, with laparoscopy being a pivotal component for its advantages in early recovery. In this setting,current recommendations regarding the use of aurinary catheter suggest its removal within the first 24-hours postoperatively. However,few studies have assessed the feasibility of leaving the operating room without it. The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colonic resections leaving the operating room with and without a urinary catheter. A retrospective study was conducted utilizing prospectively collected data from patients undergoing elective colon resections over a 17-month period. The patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of a urinary catheter upon leaving the operating room, and subsequently, their perioperative outcomes were compared. A total of 107 patients met the inclusion criteria (n = 28 with a urinary catheter and n = 79 without). Cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis (83.2%), and right hemicolectomy the most frequently performed surgery (32.7%). Two events of urinary catheter reinsertions were reported, both in the no-catheter group (0% vs 2.53%, p = 0.969), andthere were no cases of urinary tract infections. The overall and severe complications ratesexhibited no significant differences (25% vs. 26.6%, p = 1, and 7.14% vs. 5.06%, p = 1)and the length of stay was similar (p = 0.220). Removing the urinary catheter before leaving the operating room appears to be safe and associated with very low rates of urinary retention in selected patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic or upper rectal resections.

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with primary anastomosis for experimental modeling in the nonhuman primate.

Laparoscopic colon surgery is performed frequently in the clinical setting for a multitude of reasons including cancer, infection, and autoimmune disease. As a result, extensive research has been conducted in relation to clinical outcomes after surgery, but more recently, in relation to the impact of surgery and other patient factors on physiologic homeostasis including the host microbiome. Despite this, experimental surgical models for laparoscopic colon surgery are scarce in the literature with most studies utilizing rodents. While rodent studies provide valuable insights into basic mechanistic processes, the translation of novel therapeutic approaches to clinical practice often requires the use of large animal models. In exploring the intricate systems biology linking surgery and medicine, sophisticated models such as nonhuman primates (NHPs) play a pivotal role. By closely resembling human anatomical, physiological, and behavioral characteristics, NHPs facilitate the development and refinement of complex surgical techniques and peri-operative practices. Furthermore, they enable longitudinal studies that comprehensively assess both immediate and long-term outcomes. The availability and utilization of multiple robust models enhance the validity of surgical research, leading to more successful translation to human clinical practice. Here we describe our technique for performing a laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with a primary anastomosis in an NHP. The entire procedure was well tolerated without significant ventilation or hemodynamic issue. To our knowledge, this represents the first laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with primary anastomosis performed in an NHP. Furthermore, this demonstrates the feasibility of the technique and provides a relevant, preclinical model for the study of surgical colon disease. Although the surgical colectomy model in NHPs closely resembles the clinical scenario, it is crucial to recognize that a 'model' inherently comes with limitations. The intended use of any model should be carefully evaluated concerning the target patient population with the consideration of potential disparities in anatomy, physiology, environmental factors, and disease to properly interpret results. This model provides an opportunity to study mechanisms, from a systems biology perspective, underlying both innovative surgical treatments and their effects on diseases such as colon cancer, as well as benign conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, and anastomotic leak, offering high predictive value.

Clinical Effects of Laparoscopic Radical Colon Cancer Treatment with Complete Mesocolic Resection for Colon Cancer

Objective: This paper aims to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic complete mesocolic resection on the efficacy and survival of patients with colon cancer. Methods: 80 colon cancer patients were included in this study, 40 of whom were treated with traditional radical colon cancer surgery as the control group, and the other 40 were treated with laparoscopic complete mesocolic resection radical colon cancer surgery as the observation group. The study period lasted from April 2022 to April 2023, and the surgical indexes, postoperative recovery, quality of life, and the occurrence of complications of the two groups were monitored throughout the whole process and compared and analyzed. Results: The therapeutic effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The operation time, bleeding volume and postoperative hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the number of lymph node dissection was significantly higher than that of the control group, with highly significant differences (all P < 0.001). The postoperative recovery of the observation group (time of first anal defecation, time of first solid food intake, and time of wound healing) was significantly better than that of the control group (all P < 0.001). The quality of life of the observation group was significantly improved with a highly significant correlation (P < 0.001), and the complication rate was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical colon cancer surgery with complete mesocolic resection for colon cancer shows better clinical effects and advantages in the treatment of colon cancer, which is worth further promotion and application in clinical practice.

Vascular-oriented D3 lymph node dissection with left colic artery preservation for distal sigmoid colon cancer: a variety of techniques.

One of the approaches to distal sigmoid colon cancer surgical treatment is segmental colonic resection with vascular preservation of left colic artery (LCA). D3 lymph node dissection may technically vary according to different vascular anatomy. This study aims to show the approaches to D3 lymph node dissection with LCA preservation for distal sigmoid colon cancer according to different patterns of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) branching. CTangiography with 3D reconstruction was routinely performed to identify the IMA branching pattern. Laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection with D3 lymph node dissection and left colic artery preservation in standardized fashion was performed in all cases. Data, including clinical, intraoperative, and short-term surgical outcomes, is presented as median numbers (Me) and interquartile range (IQR). Twenty-six patients with distal sigmoid colon cancer were treated with laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection. The approach to D3 lymph node dissection varied according to different anatomical variations. There was one conversion (3.8%) and one anastomotic leakage (3.8%) in patients with high BMI. At the same time, there was a high apical lymph node count (Me 3 (IQR 2-5), min-max 0-10) due to the skeletonization of the IMA. The technical aspects of D3 lymph node dissection with left colic artery preservation may vary in different types of LCA and sigmoid artery branching patterns regardless of the standardized anatomical landmarks. The anatomical features should be considered when performing vascular-sparing lymph node dissection.

Laparoscopic resection of a descending colon tumor with right-sided fixation of the sigmoid colon: a case report

BackgroundIntestinal malrotation is a condition in which the process of counterclockwise rotation and fixation to the peritoneum and retroperitoneum during fetal life is incomplete. In adults, it is generally asymptomatic and is often discovered incidentally. We report a case of laparoscopic partial resection of the descending colon for a tumor of the descending colon with a rare form of intestinal malrotation in which the inferior mesenteric artery ran symmetrically and the sigmoid colon was fixed to the dorsal cecum and right-sided retroperitoneum.Case presentationA 75-year-old man was referred to our department of internal medicine due to a positive fecal occult blood test. Lower endoscopy revealed a laterally spreading tumor in the descending colon, and endoscopic submucosal dissection was attempted; however, this procedure was difficult, and the patient was referred to our department for surgical treatment. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed that the endoscopic clip was located in the descending colon on the right side, the inferior mesenteric artery was symmetrical, and the sigmoid colon was located on both the right and dorsal sides of the cecum. Laparoscopic ileocecum and sigmoid colon mobilization was performed from the left side of the patient. After the completion of sigmoid colon mobilization, which returned the sigmoid colon and descending colon to anatomical normalcy, laparoscopic partial resection of the descending colon was performed. Based on the results of a histopathological examination, a granular type of laterally spreading tumor was diagnosed. The patient was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day 8.ConclusionsDetailed preoperative imaging and surgical simulation are necessary for abdominal surgery involving intestinal malrotation.

CC vs. CC-Plus: A Comparison between Two Cranial-to-Caudal Approaches for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with approximately 1.9 million new cases and over 935,000 deaths in 2020. Right-sided colon cancer, a subset of colorectal cancer, represents a significant health burden. Laparoscopic colon surgery has significantly improved postoperative recovery. The superiority of one approach or landmark over another is still argued about due to the lack of large-scale prospective studies. However, deep understanding both of the anatomical variation and characteristics of each approach is of extreme importance to minimizing adverse effects and maximizing patient benefit after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Among these, the cranial-to-caudal approach offers advantages such as reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, and decreased risk of vascular injury. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two cranial-to-caudal approaches for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH). Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the differences between the conventional cranial-to-caudal approach with medial ligation of the middle colic vein (MCV), and the cranial-to-caudal approach with cranial MCV ligation and surgical trunk sheath opening (CC-plus). The goal is to determine which method offers superior outcomes in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and overall patient recovery. This single-center retrospective study compared two cranial-to-caudal approaches for LRH. The study included 51 patients who underwent LRH between January 2021 and November 2023 at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (26 patients) used the cranial-to-caudal approach with medial ligation of the middle colic vein (MCV), and Group B (25 patients) used the cranial-to-caudal approach with cranial MCV ligation and surgical trunk sheath opening (CC-plus). General characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0, with significance set at p < 0.05. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding age, gender, tumor location, or clinical staging. All patients achieved R0 resection with no perioperative deaths. The CC-plus group had significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter operation time compared to the CC group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in first postoperative exhausting time, first postoperative defecation time, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were evaluated in postoperative complications (surgical site infection (SSI), ileus or bowel obstruction, refractory diarrhea, anastomotic leakage, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), hemorrhage) between the two groups on a median follow up of 12.6 months. Pathological examination showed no significant differences in total lymph nodes dissected and tumor stage. The cranial-to-caudal approach with MCV ligation via the cranial approach (CC-plus) is a safe and effective method for LRH, offering advantages in terms of reduced operation time and intraoperative blood loss. This study's findings suggest that the CC-plus approach may be superior to the conventional cranial-to-caudal approach.

Differences in the Difficulty of Accessing Various 3-Dimensional Locations Under Mirror-Image Conditions During Laparoscopic Surgery.

Laparoscopic colon surgery frequently requires performing maneuvers under mirror-images conditions; the complexity differs depending on the surgical site location in the abdominal cavity. However, no previous reports have examined this. Eleven surgeons participated in this study. Operations were performed on 25 points placed at the bottom and sides of a laparoscopic training box under mirror-image conditions. The mean time-point required to operate at each point and variation between surgeons were evaluated. When the right hand was used, time-points to touch the right side-superficial ends were 0.50 to 0.58 and 0.27 to 0.45 for the other sites. With the left hand, time-points to touch the left side-superficial ends were 0.58 to 0.63 and 0.28 to 0.51 for the other sites, indicating that the most difficult manipulation was at the proximal site of the surgical port. The variation in the difficulty according to the spots increased with a decrease in the surgeon's experience (right hand, r =-0.248; left hand, r =-0.491). In performing laparoscopic surgery under mirror-image conditions, the technical difficulty varies by location, and operating in locations close to the forceps port is the most difficult.

Hyperbaric bupivacaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia combined with total intravenous anesthesia during oncological colon surgery in a 23-hour stay enhanced recovery protocol: A non-randomized study.

After the success of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, perioperative care has been further optimized in accelerated enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), where optimal pain management is crucial. Spinal anesthesia was introduced as adjunct to general anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain and facilitate mobility. This study aimed to determine which spinal anesthetic agent provides best pain relief in accelerated ERP for colon carcinoma. This single center study was a secondary analysis conducted among patients included in the aCcelerated 23-Hour erAS care for colon surgEry study who underwent elective laparoscopic colon surgery. The first 30 patients included received total intravenous anesthesia combined with spinal anesthesia with prilocaine, the 30 patients subsequently included received spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Primary endpoint of this study was the total amount of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered during hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were amounts of MMEs administered in the recovery room and surgical ward, pain score using the numeric rating scale, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Compared to prilocaine, the total amount of MMEs administered was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group (n = 60, 16.3 vs 6.3, P = .049). Also, the amount of MMEs administered and median pain scores were significantly lower after intrathecal bupivacaine in the recovery room (MMEs 11.0 vs 0.0, P = .012 and numeric rating scale 2.0 vs 1.5, P = .004). On the surgical ward, median MMEs administered, and pain scores were comparable. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine was associated with less opioid use and better pain reduction immediately after surgery compared to prilocaine within an accelerated ERP for elective, oncological colon surgery.

Laparoscopic right colectomy: correct technique based on key anatomical principles

Since the early1990s, laparoscopic right colon resections have been the most performed advanced laparoscopic procedures just after laparoscopic left colectomies and sigmoid resections. Indications for laparoscopic right colectomies are either benign or malignant diseases. Despite its many indications, a laparoscopic right or extended right colectomy is mostly performed for cancer of the caecum, the ascending colon, the hepatic flexure or the proximal transverse colon. Worldwide, colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer: an estimated 1,880,725 people were diagnosed with colorectal cancer in 2020, out of which 1,148,515 were colon cancer cases and 40% were located in the right colon. These figures make an oncologic sound surgery for right colon cancer of the utmost relevance. More recently, complete mesocolic excision has been advocated as the optimal choice in term of radicality, especially in node-positive patients with right colon cancer. Laparoscopic standard right colectomy and extended right colectomy with or without CME should be performed according to defined principles based on a close knowledge of key anatomical landmarks. This knowledge will allow to trace anatomical structures and drive instruments along the correct surgical planes and has its foundations in teachings from surgeons and scientists of past and present time.

Experience with Laparoscopic and Robotic Colon Surgery Together with Other Major Minimally Invasive Procedures for Unrelated Pathologies.

Background: Indications for combined colon surgery together with other procedures include oncologic multivisceral resections and abdominal trauma. It is unclear if combining minimally invasive (MI) colon surgery with unrelated other procedures increases the risk for complications. Patients and Methods: The surgical database from two institutions during a 10-year period was queried for combined colon surgeries together with other interventions. All open cases, combined cases performed for one pathology and MI colectomies together with a minor procedure, were excluded. Results: Median age of the 6 men and 7 women was 64.4 (range 42.7-75.4) years. Colon surgeries included right (5), sigmoid (4) transverse (1) colectomies, rectum resection (1), rectopexy (1), and colostomy reversal (1) with indications of colorectal cancer (5), diverticulitis (3), benign ileocecal mass (1), colonic volvulus (3) and rectal prolapse (1). Second procedures included two splenectomies (sarcoidosis, ITP), paraesophageal hernia repairs (4), right diaphragmatic repairs [eventration (2) and Morgagni type hernia]; cholecystectomies (2), appendectomy (acute appendicitis), duodenal wedge resection (carcinoid), reversal of a gastric bypass (Roux limb stricture) one each. Cases were done laparoscopically (7) and robotic assisted (6). In most cases only 4 trocars were used. Median OR time was 4.3 (range 2.5 to 6.6) hours. No anastomotic breakdown was observed. Conclusions: Combining MI colectomy and other major abdominal surgeries can be safely done and in this series did not increase morbidity or mortality but avoids a second operation. Patient selection seems important and port placement may need to be altered to achieve good exposure for both procedures.

Evaluation of bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

Although intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) for colon cancer requires longer operative time than extracorporeal anastomosis (EA), its short-term postoperative results, such as early recovery of bowel movement, have been reported to be equal or better. As IA requires opening the intestinal tract in the abdominal cavity under pneumoperitoneum, there are concerns about intraperitoneal bacterial infection and recurrence of peritoneal dissemination due to the spread of bacteria and tumor cells. However, intraperitoneal bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes have not been clarified. To clarify the effects of bacterial and tumor cell contamination of the intra-abdominal cavity in IA. Of 127 patients who underwent laparoscopic colon resection for colon cancer from April 2015 to December 2020, 75 underwent EA (EA group), and 52 underwent IA (IA group). After propensity score matching, the primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival rates, and secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival rates, type of recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI) incidence, number of days on antibiotics, and postoperative biological responses. Three-year disease-free survival rates did not significantly differ between the IA and EA groups (87.2% and 82.7%, respectively, P = 0.4473). The 3-year overall survival rates also did not significantly differ between the IA and EA groups (94.7% and 94.7%, respectively; P = 0.9891). There was no difference in the type of recurrence between the two groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in SSI incidence or the number of days on antibiotics; however, postoperative biological responses, such as the white blood cell count (10200 vs 8650/mm3, P = 0.0068), C-reactive protein (6.8 vs 4.5 mg/dL, P = 0.0011), and body temperature (37.7 vs 37.5 °C, P = 0.0079), were significantly higher in the IA group. IA is an anastomotic technique that should be widely performed because its risk of intraperitoneal bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes are comparable to those of EA.

Multimodal therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a case of complete clinical and radiological response of liver metastases

Background. Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Population-based studies have shown that 25–30 % of patients with colorectal cancer have synchronous liver metastases at the time of diagnosis. despite modern advances in oncology and surgery, only 25 % of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are suitable for liver resection, which is the only curative treatment option for these patients. In recent years, the indications for curative treatment of mCRC have expanded. due to the introduction of new targeted drugs into clinical practice, the tumor response rate to preoperative therapy has increased, thus increasing surgical resection rate. Some patients experience a complete clinical response, which is defined as the complete disappearance of liver metastases. However, 30–70 % of patients develop recurrent metastases in the liver within the first year of follow-up, and currently, even in the presence of complete regression of metastases, it is recommended to perform resection of the initially affected hepatic segments. Case presentation. We describe a case of complete clinical and radiological response of liver metastases after chemotherapy in a patient with sigmoid colon cancer. Molecular genetic analysis revealed the wild type of the Kras, Nras and Braf genes. The patient received 3 courses of preoperative chemotherapy according to the FOLFOxIRI + Cetuximab regimen. Laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection with d3 lymph node dissection was followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (12 cycles). After 16 months of follow-up, no evidence of colon cancer recurrence and liver metastasis was found. Conclusion. Current targeted therapy has demonstrated efficacy in treating mCRC with synchronous liver metastases and makes it possible, in selected cases, to avoid the liver resection provided that a complete clinical and radiological response of the metastases is achieved.

Demographic characteristics and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colon cancer surgeries at a newly developed cancer center in Peshawar, Pakistan.

In Pakistan, colon cancer ranks fourth in incidence, exhibiting survival rates of 90% to 14%, contingent on TNM staging and early detection. This research focuses on the demographic involvement and short-term outcomes of elective colon cancer resections at a newly established tertiary care cancer center utilizing laparoscopic procedures. A retrospective analysis of elective laparoscopic colorectal resections at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Peshawar, from April 2021 to February 2022 was conducted. Out of 157 cases, 79 had colon cancer. Criteria included patients >18 years old with positive biopsies; consent non-providers were excluded. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations using SPSS-22. The study encompassed biopsy-confirmed colon cancers in patients >18 years. 157 colorectal cases were performed, including 79 colon cancers. The sample comprised 61 males (77.2%) and 18 females (22.7%), mean age 42 years. Most patients (33%) were in the 36-45 age group. Majority were from KPK (69.6%), followed by Afghanistan (24%). Tumors were predominantly in the ascending colon (30.3%). Most were moderately differentiated (70.8%). Mean lymph node yield was 19.0, with 1.2% requiring open laparotomy. Post-discharge, one readmission occurred within 30 days. Mortality within 90 days was 2%, attributed to aspiration pneumonia and chemotherapy-related effects. Elective laparoscopic colonic surgery exhibits safety and efficacy in treating colon cancer. The study provides evidence of minimal morbidity and mortality, low readmission rates, and absence of anastomotic leaks. Hence, elective laparoscopic colonic surgery should be favored due to fewer post-operative complications and superior short-term outcomes. Larger studies on colon cancer are imperative for enhanced healthcare delivery.

Intraoperative effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery

IntroductionPulmonary atelectasis is common in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia, which increases the risk of perioperative respiratory complications. Alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARM) are used to open up the lung parenchyma with atelectasis, although the duration of their benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an ARM in laparoscopic colon surgery, the duration of response over time, and its haemodynamic impact. MethodsTwenty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery were included. After anaesthetic induction and initiation of surgery with pneumoperitoneum, an ARM was performed, and then optimal PEEP determined. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchange variables, and haemodynamic parameters, were analysed before the manoeuvre and periodically over the following 90 min. ResultsThree patients were excluded for surgical reasons. The alveolar arterial oxygen gradient went from 94.3 (62.3−117.8) mmHg before to 60.7 (29.6−91.0) mmHg after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained during the 90 min of the study. Dynamic compliance of the respiratory system went from 31.3 ml/cmH2O (26.1–39.2) before the manoeuvre to 46.1 ml/cmH2O (37.5−53.5) after the manoeuvre (P < .05). This difference was maintained for 60 min. No significant changes were identified in any of the haemodynamic variables studied. ConclusionIn patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery, performing an intraoperative ARM improves the mechanics of the respiratory system and oxygenation, without associated haemodynamic compromise. The benefit of these manoeuvres lasts for at least one hour.

Impact of institutional volume on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy.

The impact of institutional volume on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy is still being debated. This study aimed to investigate whether differences in postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colon resection exist between high- and low-volume centers. Data were reviewed for 1360 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided according to whether they were treated at a high-volume center (≥100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 947) or a low-volume center (<100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 413). Propensity score matching was applied to balance covariates and minimize selection biases that could affect outcomes. Finally, 406 patients from each group were matched. After matching, patients from high-volume centers showed a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (19 vs. 17, p < .001) and more frequent involvement of expert surgeons (98.3% vs. 88.4%, p < .001). Postoperative complication rates were similar between groups (p = .488). No significant differences between high- and low-volume centers were seen in relapse-free survival (88.8% each, p = .716) or overall survival (85.7% vs. 82.8%, p = .480). The present study suggests that in appropriately educated organizations, relatively safe procedures and good prognosis may be obtained for laparoscopic colectomy cases, regardless of institutional volume.

Artificial intelligence algorithms for predicting post-operative ileus after laparoscopic surgery

ObjectiveBy constructing a predictive model using machine learning and deep learning technologies, we aim to understand the risk factors for postoperative intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic colorectal cancer patients, and establish an effective artificial intelligence-based predictive model to guide individualized prevention and treatment, thus improving patient outcomes. MethodsWe constructed a model of the artificial intelligence algorithm in Python. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a training set for variable identification and model construction, or a test set for testing model performance, at a ratio of 7:3. The model was trained with ten algorithms. We used the AUC values of the ROC curves, as well as accuracy, precision, recall rate and F1 scores. ResultsThe results of feature engineering composited with the GBDT algorithm showed that opioid use, anesthesia duration, and body weight were the top three factors in the development of POI. We used ten machine learning and deep learning algorithms to validate the model, and the results were as follows: the three algorithms with best accuracy were XGB (0.807), Decision Tree (0.807) and Neural DecisionTree (0.807); the two algorithms with best precision were XGB (0.500) and Decision Tree (0.500); the two algorithms with best recall rate were adab (0.243) and Decision Tree (0.135); the two algorithms with highest F1 score were adab (0.290) and Decision Tree (0.213); and the three algorithms with best AUC were Gradient Boosting (0.678), XGB (0.638) and LinearSVC (0.633). ConclusionThis study shows that XGB and Decision Tree are the two best algorithms for predicting the risk of developing ileus after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. It provides new insight and approaches to the field of postoperative intestinal obstruction in colorectal cancer through the application of machine learning techniques, thereby improving our understanding of the disease and offering strong support for clinical decision-making.

An algorithm to support the surgeon's decision-making in determining the coordinates of operative access during laparoscopic colon interventions

An algorithm to support the surgeon's decision-making in determining the coordinates of operative access during laparoscopic colon interventions

Operation-specific risk of postoperative nausea: a cross-sectional study comparing 72 procedures

ObjectivesDetermination of the procedure-specific, risk-adjusted probability of nausea.DesignCross-sectional analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcome data. We used a logistic regression model with type of operation, age, sex, preoperative opioids, antiemetic...

An innovative surgical treatment method in persistent rectal prolapse: Ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy.

Herein, the results of the cases, who underwent surgical repair with or without ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy due to recurrent rectal prolapse, were discussed. The demographic characteristics, surgical technique, and results of children who were operated in the department of Pediatric Surgery for rectal prolapse between 2004 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In 18 years, six pediatric cases (2 females [33%] and 4 males [67%]) were operated for persistent rectal prolapse. The mean operative age of the patients was 7.5 years (2.1-17), and all had severe rectal prolapse. Some of these patients were followed up in other centers and their rectal prolapse continued despite diet changes, toilet behavior training, and the treatment of sclerosing agents. Rectal trimming was applied to one of the first two patients who were operated for anal atresia and recurrence did not occur. In the second case who underwent laparoscopic colon pull-through, Ekehorn rectopexy was performed alone and no recurrence was observed also in this case. Considering that rectosigmoid colon adhesions formed on the anterior abdominal wall due to colostomy opening-closing may provide ventral sigmoidopexy, it was decided to offer the option of applying both methods together. Three of the next four cases were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis. All four underwent ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy. Ekehorn's butterfly sutures were removed on 15th day and Foley catheters on 21st day. Three cases with cystic fibrosis were uneventful. However, a 14-year-old girl with a history of sexual abuse relapsed 6 months later. Ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy is a successful and unique method in terms of providing intestinal fixation. It may be the primary option for definitive surgical treatment of persistent rectal prolapse.

Usefulness of intraoperative ultrasound examination for laparoscopic right-side colon cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) in laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) requires a precise understanding of the vascular anatomy. The efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) in the identification of blood vessels for RSCC surgery was not evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and short-term outcomes of CME with CVL with or without IUS by laparoscopic surgery for RSCC. We performed IUS on 26 patients of RSCC and compared with a total of 124 patients who underwent the surgery for RSCC at our institution. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the confounding effects to imbalances in the use of IUS. The IUS identified the main feeding artery and the accompanying vein in all 26 cases. After PSM, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the IUS group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (5 ml vs. 30 ml, p = 0.035) and no significant difference of the postoperative complications was observed. The IUS reduced the risk of bleeding in the surgery for RSCC. The IUS is a safe and feasible technique that help the surgeons for anatomical understandings under real-time condition in the laparoscopic surgery of RSCC.