Peter Sands had a stormy start before taking up his new position as Executive Director of The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria on March 5, 2018. He was plunged into controversy last month after the decision by The Global Fund's senior management team to partner with Heineken, among other multinationals, and the implications for global health. The organisation, which invests and raises almost US$4 billion each year, is the world's largest public–private partnership set up to finance programmes to treat and prevent these three diseases and strengthen national health systems in the long term. The Global Fund under Peter SandsWithin the space of a few short weeks, the reputation of Peter Sands, incoming Executive Director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, has gone from respected to reckless according to some critics. In an Offline column last November, The Lancet's Editor offered an unreserved welcome to Sands, praising his “credibility” and “refreshing new vision”. Sands had assiduously built a compelling argument for governments to take the economic costs of infectious diseases more seriously. Full-Text PDF Offline: Who is Peter Sands?The appointment of a new Executive Director to lead the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria was not a tidy process. The first attempt to find a successor to Mark Dybul ended in ignominious failure, with questions raised, variously, about the moral probity and conflicts of interest of several prominent candidates. The Global Fund Board tried again. Four names made it through to the final shortlist. And then disaster seemed to strike once more. One candidate, Peter Sands, withdrew his name for “personal reasons”. Full-Text PDF Stop the toasts: the Global Fund's disturbing new partnershipIn the preface to Heather Wipfli's history of WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), she recounts how when she joined WHO to work on the FCTC, a recent fellow graduate from her masters programme invited her to lunch. He had been hired as a consultant for the alcohol industry which, in his words, was “petrified by the progress of the FCTC and believed that they would be the next target.”1 His role was to collect “intelligence on the process to help the industry prepare a defence”.1 Close to 20 years later, it is safe to say that the alcohol industry was largely successful. Full-Text PDF Partnering over the limit: The Global Fund's brewing crisisWe strongly disagree with the recent comments from Peter Sands, the new executive director of The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.1 In response to serious concerns from civil society,2 researchers,3 journals,4 and national representatives5,6 about The Global Fund's partnership with Heineken, Sands states that “the global health community needs to engage the private sector more rather than less…Because if we really want to achieve the SDGs [Sustainable Development Goals] and build more resilient health systems, we need to partner with the private sector to leverage their resources and their capabilities to innovate.”1 This statement seems to reflect a corporate logic that engagement with industries—all industries, regardless of their products and effect—is both inevitable and beneficial in all areas. Full-Text PDF
Read full abstract