Lamellar Hole-associated Epiretinal Proliferation Research Articles

Use of a Backflush Needle with a Silicone Tip Cannula to Embed Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation.

For the treatment of lamellar macular hole, the recent development of a lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) embedding technique is likely to improve functional and anatomical results. However, the peeling of LHEP is often technically challenging. We have developed a new technique using a backflush needle with a silicone tip cannula that seems safer and more effective for use in LHEP embedding. A 25-gauge vitrectomy system with an enhancing visual acuity system (D.O.R.C., Zuidland, Netherlands) was used in all cases. After core vitrectomy, triamcinolone acetonide (Wakamoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to visualize the membrane. A 25-gauge backflush needle with a silicone tip cannula was used to remove the thin preretinal membrane centripetally, leaving an LHEP on the edge of the hole. Brilliant Blue G (internal limiting membrane Blue; D.O.R.C.) was then used to stain the internal limiting membrane. This technique was used in six eyes with lamellar macular holes. In all cases, peeling and embedding of the LHEP was effectively performed without damaging the internal limiting membrane or causing retinal hemorrhage. No other intraoperative or postoperative complications were experienced. Using a silicone-tipped backflush needle with passive aspiration was a simple and effective technique for peeling and embedding of LHEPs in this small series.

Phenomenology of spontaneous closure in degenerative and mixed type lamellar macular hole.

To the describe OCT imaging characteristics of a cohort of patients showing spontaneously closing degenerative or mixed type lamellar macular holes (LMH) and to compare them to the ones of a sex and age matched group showing stable lesions. Patients diagnosed with degenerative and mixed type LMHs showing OCT-documented spontaneous anatomical closure were retrospectively selected from 3 specialized retina centres. An equal number of age and sex matching subjects were randomly selected among patients with anatomically stable lesions. Eleven (11) spontaneously closing (SC group) and 11 stable (ST group) degenerative LMH with a mean follow up of 4 years were recruited. Hyperreflective inner border (HIB) and linear hyperreflectivity in the outer plexiform layer (LHOP) at baseline were significantly more prevalent in SC group in processed images (respectively p = 0.007 and p = 0.003). A borderline significance in lamellar hole associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) at last follow up was detected (p = 0.085). As for mixed type LMH, 10 patients for SC group and 10 for ST group were recruited. LHOP at baseline in processed images was significantly more prevalent in SC group (p = 0.005). Spontaneously closing LMHs show higher prevalence of HIB and LHOP at the beginning of the closing process, a difference which is enhanced by image processing. These signs might be a signal of microglial and Muller cells coordinated activation.

Multimodel Imaging Evidence of Traction Component in Lamellar Macular Hole with Epiretinal Proliferation

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of epiretinal traction in idiopathic lamellar macular hole (LMH) with or without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP). Methods: A retrospective consecutive case series included 108 eyes diagnosed with LMH in a single tertiary referral center. Epiretinal traction was determined by the presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM), attached posterior hyaloid, or vascular traction with multimodal imaging studies and intraoperative findings in those received surgical interventions. Results: The 53 LMHs with LHEP had similar age, refraction, initial, and final visual acuity to the 55 LMHs without LHEP. Both groups exhibited high incidences of vascular traction (with and without LHEP: 92% and 84%, p = 0.36, respectively) and ERM and/or attached posterior hyaloid (both 100%, p = 1.00). The vision improved 10.5 and 14 ETDRS letters (p = 0.60) in the 30 eyes with and 19 eyes without LHEP that underwent vitrectomy. Vascular tractions released postoperatively in 88% and 100% of LMHs with and without LHEP, respectively (p = 0.27). The LMH, ERM foveoschisis, and mixed subtypes exhibited epiretinal traction in 100% of cases in all subtypes (p = 1.00). Conclusion: Our findings indicated that epiretinal traction, evaluated by multimodal imaging, is the norm rather than the exception in LMHs showing LHEP. The presence of tractional forces should be taken into consideration when treatment was planned in LMHs.

Embedding Technique versus Conventional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Lamellar Macular Holes with Epiretinal Proliferation

To examine the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) embedding and conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for lamellar macular holes (LMHs) with LHEP. Retrospective observational study. Forty eyes of 39 consecutive patients with LMHs and LHEP who underwent 3-port PPV with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. We compared the results of eyes that underwent PPV with LHEP embedding and ILM peeling (group E) with those of eyes that underwent PPV with ILM peeling only (group I) from September 2010 to September 2021. We confirmed whether the LHEP was embedded using postoperative OCT in all the cases. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the development of macular holes (MHs) were assessed. The mean patient age was 73.3 years. The mean follow-up duration was 23.1 months. There were 23 and 17 eyes in groups E and I, respectively. Preoperative BCVA (P= 0.774) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (P= 0.800) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The final BCVA in group E was better than that in group I (P= 0.059). The final CRT in group E was thicker than that in group I (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, a significant improvement in BCVA was observed in group E at 3 months (P= 0.001) and at the final visit (P < 0.001). None of the eyes in group E developed postoperative MHs, whereas 5 eyes in group I developed postoperative MHs. Pars plana vitrectomy using the LHEP embedding technique improved visual acuity significantly and yielded better anatomic outcomes than those with PPV using conventional ILM peeling; MH formation did not occur. Embedding LHEP is more effective than conventional surgical procedures for LMHs.

Vitreomacular Interface Disorders in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

Vitreomacular interface plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). This study investigated the prevalence and risk factors of vitreomacular interface disorders (VMID) in PDR. The macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans of 493 eyes from 378 PDR patients were retrospectively reviewed to detect VMID, including vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), epiretinal membrane (ERM), lamellar hole–associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP), and macular hole (MH). The associations between VMID and baseline factors, intraretinal structure, and visual acuity were analyzed. The prevalence was 78.9% for ERM, 13.4% for VMT, 4.8% for MH, 2.2% for LHEP, and 2.0% for VMA, respectively. On multivariable analyses (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval), fibrovascular proliferation (FVP) was positively associated with MH (8.029, 1.873–34.420), VMT (3.774, 1.827–7.798), and ERM (2.305, 1.460–3.640). High-risk PDR was another risk factor of ERM (1.846, 1.101–3.090). Female gender was positively associated with MH (3.836, 1.132–13.006), while vitreous hemorrhage was negatively associated with MH (0.344, 0.133–0.890). Eyes with all VMID subtypes showed more frequent macular cysts and tractional retinal detachment with poorer visual acuity (p ≤ 0.001). Therefore, the prevalence of VMID was considerably high, indicating that this distinct entity should be considered in interventions for PDR.

Idiopathic Macular Hole without Vitreomacular Separation

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and treatment outcomes of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) without vitreomacular separation (VMS). Methods: Consecutive cases of idiopathic FTMH at one tertiary center from January 2013 to April 2020 were retrospectively recruited. They were separated into two groups according to the findings in optical coherence tomography (OCT): FTMH with VMS and FTMH without VMS. Ophthalmic examinations and OCT were performed pre- and postoperatively. The clinical findings were compared between the two groups. Results: Of the total 124 cases, 15 (12.1%) were noted as FTMH without VMS with the presence of an attached posterior hyaloid (PH) at macula. The macular hole (MH) size was smaller (276.06 ± 170.10 μm) compared to those with VMS (492.83 ± 209.31 μm) (p < 0.001). The incidence of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) was much higher in this group (13/15, 86.7%) compared to FTMH with VMS (11/109, 10.1%) (p < 0.001). A higher rate of spontaneous closure of MH (13.3%) was also noted in FMTH without VMS (13.3% vs. 0.9% in FTMH with VMS, p = 0.040). After operation, the MH closure rate was 93.3%. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.098). Conclusions: A small percentage (12.1% in this series) of idiopathic FTMH had no VMS. The completely attached PH along with the high incidence of LHEP implied a tangential traction in FTMH without VMS. The MH size was usually small, and the postoperative outcomes were similar to those of conventional FTMH with VMS.

A rare finding of lamellar macular hole with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in retinal vein occlusion

<br>A 69-year-old female presented with right eye vision of 20/120 Snellens. Ultrawide-field fundus imaging showed old vitreous hemorrhage with superotemporal sclerosed vessels post venous occlusion. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography revealed degenerative lamellar macular home (LMH) with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP). The patient underwent surgery using vitrectomy with the embedding technique. Post surgery, good recovery of the foveal contour was achieved with vision improving to 20/40. LMH with LHEP can be a sequela of chronic macular edema in RVO.<br>

Lamellar Hole-associated Epiretinal Proliferation in choroideremia: a case report

BackgroundTo report a clinical case of a patient affected with choroideremia (CHM) who underwent macular surgery for a macular hole (MH) with Lamellar Hole-associated Epiretinal Proliferation (LHEP).Case presentationWe have described a 48-year-old male patient affected with CHM who developed MH with LHEP over a 7-year follow-up. The patient was referred to the Regional Center for Hereditary Retinal Degenerations of the Eye Clinic in Florence (Italy) in April 2012. The patient underwent vitrectomy and Inner Limiting Membrane (ILM) and LHEP peeling with fluid-air exchange. Ultra-structural examination of the excised epiretinal proliferation, carried out using electron microscopy, showed dense amorphous material, mainly composed of abundant clusters of fibrous collagens resembling compact fibrous long spacing collagen (FLSC), embedded in native vitreous collagen (NVC) and type IV collagen. No cells were detected in any of the specimens collected. At the 3rd-week postoperative follow-up the macular hole was closed.ConclusionMacular hole with LHEP can be detected in CHM patients; in our patient the macular hole showed tractional and degenerative features, with good anatomical results after macular surgery.

Embedding and sparing of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in the treatment of lamellar macular holes.

Compare the outcomes of two surgical techniques, lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) embedding and LHEP sparing, in treating idiopathic lamellar macular holes (LMHs). Retrospective consecutive case series with 34 LMHs with LHEP that underwent operation. LHEP-sparing technique was used before July 2015 and LHEP-embedding after July 2015. Morphological features in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were identified, including the presence of LHEP, ellipsoid zone (EZ) defects, and types of LMH closure, along with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after surgery. No baseline differences were observed between the embedding (17 patients) and sparing (17 patients) groups in LMH size, retinal defect depth, or preoperative BCVA. The two groups' mean postoperative BCVAs were similar (embedding vs sparing: 0.388 ± 0.337 vs 0.465 ± 0.418 [Snellen: 20/49 and 20/58], P = 0.812). Postoperatively, a U-type closure was observed in 77 and 65% of patients in the embedding and sparing groups, respectively. Both groups exhibited V-type and T-type closures in half of the remaining patients (P = 0.753). Older age, postoperative external limiting membrane defect, postoperative EZ disruption, and non-U-type closure were associated with worse final BCVA. Both the LHEP-embedding and LHEP-sparing techniques significantly improved vision in patients with LMHs and produced similar visual and anatomical outcomes. Most patients achieved a normal U-type closure with either technique. Preservation of LHEP during surgery is vital and could facilitates successful surgery.

Modified surgical technique for lamellar macular holes with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP).

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation embedding technique with modification in the surgical management of degenerative lamellar macular hole (LMH). There is retrospective case series of consecutive eyes who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with LHEP embedding with internal limiting membrane (ILM) inversion technique for degenerative LMH. Primary outcome measure was improvement in foveal contour and central foveal thickness (CFT). Secondary outcome measures were changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), status of outer retinal layers (external limiting membrane-ELM & ellipsoid zone-EZ) and complications. Ten eyes were operated by modified LHEP embedding technique. Mean age was 65.8 ± 5.3years with 1:1 male to female ratio. Simultaneous cataract surgery was done in 70% cases. Mean follow-up duration was 7.9 ± 0.87months. 80% (8/10) eyes had improvement in foveal contour to normal appearance with increase in residual foveal thickness from 90.2 ± 26.83 microns to CFT of 226 ± 35.44 microns at 6months (p = 0.0054). Mean BCVA improved from 0.69 ± 0.19 logMAR to 0.32 ± 0.29 logMAR (p = 0.012). External limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) defects were present in four eyes (40%) pre-operatively. At the final visit 2 eyes (20%) had persistent defect in both ELM & EZ. None of the eyes progressed to full-thickness macular hole following surgery. The modified surgical technique of LHEP Embedding with ILM inversion is demonstrated to provide satisfactory results with reduced risk of complications for degenerative LMH. Larger and long-term follow-up studies are needed to establish this technique as standard surgical procedure for LMH with LHEP.

Primary vitrectomy for degenerative and tractional lamellar macular holes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PurposeTo assess the efficacy of vitrectomy in degenerative and tractional lamellar macular holes (LMHs) by meta-analysis of published studies.MethodsPubMed, Medline and Embase databases were searched up to May 2020. Included cohorts were divided into three groups: degenerative LMH group, lamellar hole associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) group and tractional LMH group. LHEP is likely to be associated with degenerative LMHs, but less commonly could be associated with mixed LMHs. To reduce risk of possible misclassification bias, eyes with LHEP which could not have been precisely classified by the authors, were included into the LHEP group. The primary outcome was to investigate the visual change following primary vitrectomy in the degenerative LMH and LHEP group versus the tractional LMH group. A sensitivity analysis excluding the LHEP group was also performed on the primary outcome. Mean difference (MD) in best corrected visual acuity between baseline and post-treatment was calculated, along with 95% confidence interval (CI). Rate of incidence of post-operative full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) was assessed as secondary outcome.ResultsThirteen studies were included. Pooled analyses including all groups showed a significant visual improvement following vitrectomy (pre-post MD = -0.17;95%CI = -0.22,-0.12;p<0.001), with no difference in visual improvement between the degenerative LMH and LHEP group and the tractional LMH group. The sensitivity analysis excluding LHEP group confirmed no difference in visual change between the degenerative LMH group (pre-post MD = -0.18;95%CI = -0.24,-0.12;p<0.001) and the tractional LMH group (MD = -0.16;95%CI = -0.26,-0.07;p<0.001). The incidence rate of post-operative FTMH was higher in the degenerative LMH and LHEP group than in the tractional LMH group (p = 0.002).ConclusionPrimary vitrectomy for LMH ensured a favorable visual outcome, with no difference in visual gain between degenerative and tractional LMHs. However, a higher incidence of post-operative FTMHs was found in eyes with the degenerative LMH subtype.

SPONTANEOUS LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLES CLOSURE.

To report two cases of spontaneous closure of lamellar macular holes with epiretinal proliferation (ERP). Observational cases report. Two patients affected with lamellar macular hole showed progressive and spontaneous closure of the hole associated with ERP development. At presentation, both patients presented with irregular foveal contour, and foveal cavitation with apparent loss of retinal tissue. In both cases, ERP, also called "lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation", was present and increased in size over time. This proliferation progressively developed across the hole with apparent restoration of the foveal contour and preservation of visual acuity. This report describes two cases of lamellar macular hole in which ERP increased over time, resulting in lamellar macular hole closure. Such observations may suggest a spontaneous healing process driven by glial cell proliferation.

Surgery outcomes of lamellar macular eyes with or without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation: a meta-analysis

BackgroundGiven the two different kinds of epiretinal membranes, this study aimed to compare both the structural and functional outcomes of lamellar macular holes with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) after surgery.MethodPublications up to July 2020 that compared the surgical outcomes of lamellar macular hole with and without LHEP were included. Forest plots were created by using a weighted summary of proportion meta-analysis. Fixed or random effects models were used on the basis of I2 heterogeneity estimates. Meanwhile, to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis, a sensitivity analysis was carried out.ResultsEight pertinent publications that contained a total of 176 eyes without LHEP and 173 eyes with LHEP were included. They were all retrospective studies and had a follow-up of at least 6 months. In all studies, the preoperative best corrected visual acuity showed no significant differences between the two groups, and the visual acuity improved in both groups after surgery. The pooled result for the improved best corrected visual acuity was 0.18 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10 to 0.26; P < 0.01) between the with and without LHEP groups. The restored ellipsoid zone odds ratio was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.26 to 2.44; P = 0.69) for the group with LHEP compared to the group without LHEP.ConclusionPatients without LHEP had better postoperative visual acuity than patients with LHEP. No significant difference in restored ellipsoid zone was found between the two groups.

Morphology of partial-thickness macular defects: presumed roles of M\xfcller cells and tissue layer interfaces of low mechanical stability

BackgroundThe pathogenesis of partial-thickness macular defects and the role of Müller glial cells in the development of such defects are not well understood. We document the morphological characteristics of various types of partial-thickness macular defects using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, with the focus on tractional and degenerative lamellar holes, and discuss possible pathogenic mechanisms.MethodsA retrospective case series of 61 eyes of 61 patients with different types of partial-thickness macular defects is described.ResultsPartial-thickness macular defects are caused by anteroposterior or tangential traction onto the fovea exerted by the partially detached posterior hyaloid and epiretinal membranes, respectively. Tractional elevation of the inner Müller cell layer of the foveola—without (outer lamellar holes, foveal pseudocysts) or with a disruption of this layer (tractional lamellar holes, macular pseudoholes)—produces an elevation of the inner layers of the foveal walls (nerve fiber layer to outer plexiform layer [OPL]) and a schisis between the OPL and Henle fiber layer (HFL). With the exception of outer lamellar holes, the (outer part of the) central outer nuclear layer and the external limiting membrane remain nondisrupted in the various types of partial-thickness defects. Degenerative lamellar holes are characterized by cavitations between the inner plexiform layer and HFL of the foveal walls; many cases have lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP). Proliferating cells of the disrupted Müller cell cone may contribute to the development of LHEP and fill the spaces left by degenerated photoreceptors in the foveal center.ConclusionsIt is suggested that morphological characteristics of partial-thickness macular defects can be explained by the disruption of the (stalk of the) Müller cell cone in the foveola and the location of tissue layer interfaces with low mechanical stability: the boundary with no cellular connections between both Müller cell populations in the foveola, and the interface between the OPL and HFL in the foveal walls and parafovea. We propose that the development of the cavitations in degenerative lamellar holes is initiated by traction which produces a schisis between the OPL and HFL, and enlarged by a slow and chronic degeneration of Henle fibers and bipolar cells.Trial registration retrospectively registered, #143/20-ek, 04/03/2020

PEELING OF THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE WITH FOVEAL SPARING FOR TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLE.

To compare the functional and anatomical results of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy with those of observation for degenerative lamellar macular hole with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. A prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study. Thirty-six eyes were randomized to undergo surgery with foveal internal limiting membrane sparing (Group S) or observation only (Group C). The main outcome measures were foveal retinal sensitivity, visual acuity, and central retinal thickness. After 6 months, a significant difference was found in foveal retinal sensitivity between Group S (12.8 ± 1.7 dB) and Group C (9.39 ± 1.8 dB; P < 0.001). Similarly, best-corrected visual acuity improved in Group S and remained stable in Group C (respectively, 0.17 ± 0.13 and 0.46 ± 0.21 logMAR; P < 0.001). A significant increase in central retinal thickness was observed in Group S, but not in Group C (272 ± 24 vs. 147 ± 20 µm, P < 0.001). Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling is a feasible treatment for degenerative lamellar macular hole with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation, yielding better improvements in best-corrected visual acuity and foveal retinal sensitivity than observation alone. Further studies are needed to optimize this new surgical approach.

Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal membrane is a common feature of macular holes in retinitis pigmentosa.

To describe the features and surgical outcomes of macular holes (MHs) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). A review of consecutive series of 110 patients (206 eyes) with RP who underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations was conducted. Eleven eyes of ten RP patients were identified with MHs (full thickness or lamellar). Atypical epiretinal membrane, which appeared on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images as a thick homogenous layer of moderately reflective material that was present on the inner retinal layer, was considered to be lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP). Five eyes underwent modified vitreoretinal surgery, where hole margin LHEP tissue was retained. Nine eyes exhibited a lamellar macular hole (LMH), one exhibited a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), and one exhibited both FTMH and LMH. LHEP was found in all eyes, identified intraoperatively as yellowish, sticky epiretinal membrane with internal limiting membrane beneath it. Two eyes experienced spontaneous closure of MHs without visual acuity (VA) improvement. Five eyes that underwent surgery achieved sealed MHs post-operatively and demonstrated improved, but limited, vision at their latest follow-up. LHEP is common in MHs associated with RP. While some eyes could achieve spontaneous closure without any VA changes, a conservative vitreoretinal surgery approach, in which the hole margin LHEP tissue is spared, can effectively repair these MHs with limited VA improvement.

Results of lamellar macular hole-associated epiretinal proliferation embedding technique for the treatment of degenerative lamellar macular hole.

To investigate the outcomes of embedding lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) into retinal cleavage for the surgical treatment of degenerative lamellar macular hole (LMH). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 34 consecutive eyes of degenerative LMH patients who underwent vitrectomy with LHEP embedding and who were followed up for at least 12months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and macular structure preoperatively and at the final follow-up were compared. The mean (±SD) follow-up period was 30.0 ± 17.7months. Twelve patients (35.3%) were men, and the mean age was 69.6 ± 10.1years. Twenty-three eyes (67.6%) underwent simultaneous cataract surgery. BCVA was significantly improved at the final visit, from 0.31 ± 0.25 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units to 0.10 ± 0.25 (P < 0.01). This improvement in mean BCVA at the final postoperative visit occurred regardless of whether the eyes underwent simultaneous cataract surgery, from 0.30 ± 0.26 preoperatively to 0.04 ± 0.16 (P < 0.01) in the "with cataract surgery" group and from 0.32 ± 0.26 preoperatively to 0.21 ± 0.35 (P < 0.05) in the "without cataract surgery" group. CRT was also significantly improved at the final visit, from 123.2 ± 42.6μm preoperatively to 191.2 ± 42.6μm (P < 0.01). External limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone defects were detected in 17 (50.0%) and 15 (44.1%) eyes, respectively, but these were resolved in 10 (58.8%) and 7 (46.7%) eyes, respectively, at the final visit. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Embedding LHEP may be an effective and safe procedure to treat degenerative LMH.

DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION OF A LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLE WITH LAMELLAR HOLE–ASSOCIATED EPIRETINAL PROLIFERATION

To describe evolution and progression of a lamellar macular hole (LMH) with "lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP)" using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence. Observational case report. We report on a 63-year-old male patient demonstrating a complete history of LMH development with LHEP occurring during a follow-up period of 8 years. Presenting with a normal foveal contour and attached posterior vitreous at first visit, an LMH developed shortly after incomplete posterior vitreous detachment with vitreopapillary adhesion. On spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images, progression of the LMH including enlargement of the intraretinal cavitation and decrease in the retinal thickness were documented. An increase of LHEP was first documented 6 months after LMH evolution. One month after cataract surgery and 6 years after the first visit, a full-thickness macular hole developed that closed spontaneously after 4 weeks. Localization of LHEP had moved into the foveal defect toward the outer retinal layers. Thereafter, the LMH was stable, and the patient presented with a visual acuity of 20/25. Proper follow-up time is important for studying eyes with an LMH. Epimacular cell proliferation shows progression over time that appears to be associated with morphologic changes of the LMH including shape of the lamellar defect, amount of LHEP, and contractive properties of epiretinal tissue. The presence of LHEP was documented shortly after posterior vitreous detachment.

Embedding of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation combined with internal limiting membrane inversion for the treatment of lamellar macular hole: a case report

BackgroundWe recently reported that lamellar macular hole (LMH) with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) can be effectively treated by embedding the LHEP into the retinal cleavage to improve foveal contour and visual acuity. Here, we report a case of LMH with LHEP for which we performed embedding of the LHEP combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) inversion. We then evaluated the effects of this surgery on macular morphology and visual functions.Case presentationA 62-year-old man presented with visual disturbance (20/29) and metamorphopsia in his right eye. B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging revealed the presence of both partial-thickness defect of the macula with degenerative retinal cleavage and LHEP at the surface of the retina. En face OCT imaging showed the absence of retinal fold. We performed phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation, vitrectomy, embedding of LHEP into the retinal cleavage, and ILM inversion. Three months after the surgery, both foveal contour and visual acuity (20/20) were improved and metamorphopsia was reduced.ConclusionEmbedding of the LHEP combined with ILM inversion may be an effective treatment for LMH with LHEP.

LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLE WITH LAMELLAR HOLE–ASSOCIATED EPIRETINAL PROLIFERATION IN FAMILIAL EXUDATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY

To present a clinical case of lamellar macular hole with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in a pediatric familial exudative vitreoretinopathy patient. Retinal findings are described, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography documentation is provided. The efficacy of surgical intervention is also discussed. A 4-year-old girl presented with poor vision in her right eye, which was discovered during routine physical examination. Clinical examination revealed familial exudative vitreoretinopathy in both eyes and a lamellar macular hole in the right eye. Both of the patient's parents were also examined, which revealed familial exudative vitreoretinopathy in the girl's father. The patient underwent vitrectomy, inner limiting membrane and lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation peeling, and air-fluid exchange. Images obtained with optical coherence tomography revealed lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation at the lamellar defect edge in the patient's right eye. Postoperative examination showed that the lamellar macular hole had closed. Pediatric familial exudative vitreoretinopathy patients may develop lamellar macular hole with lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. Vitreoretinal surgery effectively closes this type of macular hole.