Contraception:The Tragic Deception Paul M. Conner O.P. Yes, contraception is a tragic deception. Contraception is so subtle. It is tragic for unmarried, and even married, women. It is tragic for men or women who seek the true fulfillment and beauty of married and family life, or for those who seek a "safe" way to enjoy non-marital sexual relationships. It is tragic for families and for a culture made up principally of contracepting couples. It is tragic especially for Christians convinced that using contraception does not damage their marriage or their growth in Christian life. That contraception is an insidious tragedy is the focus of this commentary. But a vast majority of child-bearing couples in the United States reportedly use contraception! Even some Western government leaders are sure that this overwhelming majority proves that contraception is an unqualified good for those who need it.1 Moreover, many women, if not most, believe that it is needed for health reasons. How, therefore, could contraception be tragic? After all, contraception seems a godsend for the poor of the world, those struggling to support their families. It seems to help society struggling to pay health costs, energy costs, and welfare costs. Contraception seems like [End Page 321] a wonderful technological advance that has solved so many problems. Debate must be obsolete. Many people seem to think that the Catholic Church is retrograde on this issue, and that the Church will eventually change the condemnation of contraception of Pope Paul VI in his 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae. The Anglican Church led the way for this change among Christian bodies in its Lambeth Conference of 1930, and the Catholic Church, some think, will just have to catch up. Yet, strangely, nearly all Western countries are on a path that can be called social suicide, since none are replacing their populations with children.2 A main factor for this trend of more than fifty years in these countries is the widespread use of contraception. Another factor, of course, is abortion. Even though some Western governments are offering financial incentives for additional children, there are few signs that people in these cultures are willing to forego contraception and abortion, have more children, and save their societies from eventual extinction. Conversely, other religions and cultures, notably Muslims, retain their traditional opposition to unrestricted contraception.3 Such steadfastness, cultural and religious, runs counter to the prevailing secular mindset in Western countries today, making many in those countries assume that contraception is only a religious issue, and therefore on this basis is easily discounted. This commentary intends to investigate the morality of contraception principally from objective standpoints other than those of religion. It will show that sound science and philosophy (applicable to all cultures) alone yield compelling conclusions that the popular view of contraception is in fact a tragic deception. What Is Contraception Morally? Contraception is a choice of action, after sexual intercourse, to keep sperm from fertilizing an egg.4 In a moral sense, it is what a person or [End Page 322] couple chooses to do with some degree of moral awareness and responsibility. This is the "moral object," the main determinant of the morality of our actions. It is a means-step toward some goal. The goal may be made up of one or several reasons why they choose to act this way. These reasons are their moral motive, the second moral determinant to any of our actions. It may be true that the couple is in tough circumstances of poverty, health issues, family size, and so on. Their situation of trying circumstances, a third moral determinant, often generates part or all of the motive. Then, one's motive generates a further choice, to discover a means-step (the moral object) to fulfill it—in this case, either contraception or another anti-reproductive alternative. Finally, the fourth moral determinant completes the moral evaluation of contraception (and of any other action). It is comprised of the results stemming from this action. Technically called "consequences," they may affect several aspects of a couple's marriage and their individual persons. Here lies tragedy often in disguise. If foreknown, each of these four elements—what is chosen...
Read full abstract