Abstract Background Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric oncology patients during their treatment. Bloodstream infections are the main site of infection in these patients. Bacteremia in these patients can be secondary to a primary infectious focus, result from central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) or mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI). Methods Descriptive study of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients undergoing oncological treatment and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a tertiary pediatric oncology hospital in Brazil from January 1st, 2021 to June 30th, 2023. Infections were classified according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC/NHSN) criteria into CLABSIs, MBI-LCBIs and secondary bloodstream infections. Among the bloodstream infections that met CDC/NHSN criteria for CLABSI, were analyzed separately those who also met the criteria of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) according to Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Results During this period were diagnosed 335 episodes of bloodstream infection (123 episodes in 2021, 150 in 2022 and 62 episodes in the first 6 months of 2023). There were 378 microorganisms isolated. These infections were classified into: 35% CLABSIs, 27% MBI-LCBIs, 23% CRBSIs, and 15% secondary bloodstream infections. Among the CLABSIs, the most common microorganisms were non-fermenting gram negative bacilli (NFGNB) 38%, enterobacteriaceae 35% and coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) 11%. Between CRBSIs, there were 31% enterobacteriaceae, 22% CoNS and 19% NFGNB. Among the MBI-LCBIs there were 66% enterobacteriaceae and 23% group viridans streptococci (VGS). Streptococcus pneumoniae (33%) was the most common microorganism in secondary infections followed by Staphylococcus aureus (17%). Assessing all infections together, the main enterobacteriaceae were Klebsiella spp. (40%) and only 50% of them were sensitive to cefepime while 10% were carbapenems resistant. Among NFGNB, 13% of Pseudomonas spp. and 5% of Acinetobacter spp. were carbapenems resistant. Between the gram-positive bacteria, 77% of the S. aureus were methicillin sensitive, the same percentage of the VGS were sensitive to cefepime. Conclusion Among bloodstream infections, there were a predominance of CLABSI followed by MBI-LCBIs. Antimicrobial resistance between gram-positive bacteria, is of little concern in our institution. In the case of gram-negative bacteria, resistance to cefepime is becoming worrying among enterobacteriaceae.