Kyphoplasty Group Research Articles

Early kyphoplasty in the elderly patient

Prevalence of vertebral compression fractures is over 30 % in the elderly population. The ideal treatment for these fractures remains a subject of debate. The objective in this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of early kyphoplasty and conservative treatment in vertebral compression fractures. Materials and methodsObservational retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients with acute vertebral compression fracture (25 patients treated by kyphoplasty and 25 treated by conservative therapy). Number and location of the fractures, radiographic assessment (Beck Index), symptoms duration, pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale -VAS), patient's functional capacity (Oswestry Disability Index – ODI) and analgesic use and dose were analysed. Both groups were followed for 1 year. ResultsMost of the patients in the sample were women with a mean age of 80,5 years old, both groups being comparable in age and sex (p=1 and p=1 respectively). The mean ASA score for kyphoplasty vs conservative was 2.6 vs 2.5 (p 0,54). VAS at initial diagnosis 8,50 vs 8,80 (p 0,405). VAS two months after initiation of the treatment 4,40 vs 2,40 (p 0,028), and VAS at one year follow-up was 1,80 vs 1,30 (p 0,216). ODI mean scores conservative vs kyphoplasty at initial diagnosis were 69,79 vs 74 (p 0,87) and two months later 31,60 vs15,40 (p 0,03). The mean Beck Index at the diagnosis conservative vs kyphoplasty was 59,20 % vs 61,50 % (p 0,68) and after 1 year 51,80 % vs 57,40 % (p 0,45). In the kyphoplasty group only 1 patient had to be hospitalised during 24 h. Cement leakage was detected in 2 patients without clinical repercussion. In the conservative group 5 patients had home help during their recovery and 3 went to nursing homes. ConclusionKyphoplasty is a minimally invasive surgical procedure with hardly any complications. It offers a faster and greater pain relief to elderly patients than conservative treatment. Early treatment with kyphoplarty allows patients to walk in a short time (early wandering) after the fracture. This treatment avoids long periods of rest and loss of muscle mass. It is a surgical procedure that should be considered as part of the initial therapeutic choices for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Level of evidenceIV

Percutaneous kyphoplasty combined with pediculoplasty for the surgical treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures

ObjectiveThis study introduces a minimally invasive technique for efficient three-column reconstruction, augmentation, and stabilization of osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures (OTLBFs).MethodsSixty-eight patients with OTLBFs and no neurological deficits were included from July 2019 to September 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: the simple percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) group (n = 32) and the percutaneous kyphoplasty combined with pediculoplasty (PKCPP) group (n = 36). The clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed during a minimum 1-year follow-up period. Clinical outcomes were assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS) and modified MacNab grading criteria. The radiological outcomes included the Cobb angle (CA), anterior wall height (AWH), and posterior wall height (PWH). The surgery duration, postoperative analgesic dosage, length of hospital stay, and complications were recorded.ResultsSurgery duration was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). The PKCPP group had a lower analgesic dosage and shorter hospital stay (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, the PKCPP group exhibited better VAS scores and modified MacNab scale scores (P < 0.05), but the differences at the last follow-up assessment were not significant (P > 0.05). Postoperative CA, AWH, and PWH correction were not significantly different on the first postoperative day (P > 0.05). However, the PKCPP group had significantly less CA and PWH loss of correction at the last follow-up visit (P < 0.05). The PKCPP group had significantly fewer complications (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe PKCPP technique complements simple PKP for OTLBFs. It quickly relieves pain, maintains the vertebral body height and Cobb angle, ensures cement stabilization, and offers more stable three-column support.

Assessment of Cement Leakage in Decompressed Percutaneous Kyphoplasty.

Symptomatic osteoporotic compression fractures are commonly addressed through vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. However, cement leakage poses a significant risk of neurological damage. We introduced "aspiration percutaneous kyphoplasty", also known as "decompressed kyphoplasty", as a method to mitigate cement leakage and conducted a comparative analysis with high viscosity cement vertebroplasty. We conducted a retrospective study that included 136 patients with single-level osteoporotic compression fractures. Among them, 70 patients underwent high viscosity cement vertebroplasty, while 66 patients received decompressed percutaneous kyphoplasty with low-viscosity cement. Comparison parameters included cement leakage rates, kyphotic angle alterations, and the occurrence of adjacent segment fractures. The overall cement leakage rate favored the decompressed kyphoplasty group (9.1% vs. 18.6%), although statistical significance was not achieved (p = 0.111). Nonetheless, the risk of intradiscal leakage significantly reduced in the decompressed kyphoplasty cohort (p = 0.011), which was particularly evident in cases lacking the preoperative cleft sign on X-rays. Kyphotic angle changes and the risk of adjacent segment collapse exhibited similar outcomes (p = 0.739 and 0.522, respectively). We concluded that decompressed kyphoplasty demonstrates efficacy in reducing intradiscal cement leakage, particularly benefiting patients without the preoperative cleft sign on X-rays by preventing intradiscal leakage.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw applied to the treatment of Kümmel's disease in porcine vertebrae.

Background and objective: Treatment of Kümmel's Disease (KD) with pure percutaneous kyphoplasty carries a greater likelihood of bone cement displacement due to hardened bone and defect of the peripheral cortex. In this study, we designed a novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this modified surgical instruments in porcine vertebrae. Methods: 18 mature porcine spine specimens were obtained and soaked in 10% formaldehyde solution for 24h. 0.5000mmol/L EDTA-Na2 solution was used to develop in vitro osteoporosis models of porcine vertebrae. They were all made with the bone deficiency at the anterior edge of L1. These specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups for different ways of treatment: Group A: pure percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) group; Group B: unilateral novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw fixation combined with PKP group; Group C: bilateral novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw fixation combined with PKP group. The MTS multi-degree of freedom simulation test system was used for biomechanical tests, including axial loading of 500N pressure, range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation at 5Nm, and the displacement of bone cement mass at maximum angles of 5° and 10°. Result: The three groups were well filled with bone cement, no leakage or displacement of bone cement was observed, and the height of the vertebrae was higher than pre-operation (p < 0.05). In the left/right axial rotation, the specimens were still significantly different (p < 0.05) from the intact specimens in terms of ROM after PKP. In other directions, ROM of all group had no significant difference (p < 0.05) and was close to the intact vertebrae. Compared with PKP group, the relative displacement of bone cement in groups B and C was smaller (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the in vitro animal vertebral models, the treatment of KD with the placement of novel pedicle minimally invasive bone cement screw combined with PKP can effectively restore the vertebral height, improve the stability of the affected vertebra and prevent the displacement of bone cement. Biomechanically, there is no significant difference between bilateral and unilateral fixation.

Comparative study between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in management of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures

BackgroundPercutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty are effective minimally invasive procedures in reducing pain and improving the quality of life in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with different degrees, but it may lead to serious neurological complications.ResultsTwenty-five patients were included in our study. Both techniques were done under local anesthesia using bi-pedicular approach. All cases were assessed using plain radiographs pre- and post-operative, Visual Analogue Scale for pain, and modified Oswestry Disability Index for functional disability. Thirteen patients had vertebroplasty and 12 patients had kyphoplasty. The mean age for vertebroplasty group was 66.94 ± 6.71, while in kyphoplasty group, the mean age was 70.38 ± 9.21. In vertebroplasty group, there were ten females and three males, while in kyphoplasty group, there were nine females and three males. All cases had single vertebral level affection except one patient in the vertebroplasty group that had double-level affection. In vertebroplasty group, ten patients had lumbar spine affection, two patients had dorsal spine affection and one patient had combined dorsal and lumbar spine affection. In kyphoplasty group, ten patients had lumbar spine affection and two patients had dorsal spine affection. The mean post-operative Visual Analogue Scale was 0.46 and 0.50 in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty groups, respectively. The mean post-operative modified Oswestry Disability Index became 4.15 and 4 in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty groups, respectively. The mean post-operative local kyphotic angle was 6.0° and 6.50° in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty groups, respectively. The mean vertebral height became 73.15% and 75% post-operatively in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty groups, respectively. The intra-operative cement leakage occurred in three cases of vertebroplasty group and one case of kyphoplasty group (P = 0.644). The cost of kyphoplasty was very high in comparison with vertebroplasty.ConclusionsThere is no difference between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as regard pain relief, improved quality of life, correction of kyphotic angle, vertebral height restoration and the incidence of cement leakage except that kyphoplasty has a very high cost than vertebroplasty. Therefore, both techniques have an equal effect in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of percutaneous mesh-container-plasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures. Patients with malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures treated in a single tertiary care center between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and included in the study. Ninety-four patients who were diagnosed by pathological biopsy were divided into 2 groups according to the type of surgical treatment: the percutaneous kyphoplasty group (50 patients: 24 male, 26 female; mean age=73.02 ± 7.79 years) and the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group (44 patients: 21 male, 23 female; mean age=74.68 ± 7.88 years). The epidemiological data, surgical outcomes, and clinical and radiological features were compared between the 2 groups. Cement leakage, height restoration, deformity correction, and cement distribution were calculated from the radiographs. The visual analog scale, Oswestry disability index, Karnofsky performance scale scores, and short-form 36 health survey domains role physi cal and bodily pain were calculated preoperatively, immediately, and 1 year postoperatively. The visual analog scale score improved from 5 (range=4-6) preoperatively to 2 (range=2-3) immediately postoperatively in the percutaneous kyphoplasty group and from 5 (range=4-6) preoperatively to 2 (range=2-2) immediately postoperatively in the percutane ous mesh-container-plasty group; there was a significant difference between the 2 groups (P=.018). Although Oswestry disability index, Karnofsky performance scale, short-form 36 health survey domains bodily pain and role physical significantly improved in both groups after surgery compared to the preoperative period, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). The mean cost in the percutaneous kyphoplasty group was lower than that in the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group (5563 ± 439 vs. 6569 ± 344 thousand dollars, P < .05). There was no difference between the cement volume in the 2 groups, and cement distribution in the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group was higher than that in the percutaneous kyphoplasty group (44.30% ± 10.25% vs. 32.54% ± 11.76%, P < .05). Cement leakage was found to be lesser in the percutaneous mesh-container-plasty group (7/44) than in the percutane ous kyphoplasty group (18/50, P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in the recovery of vertebral body height and improvement of segmental kyphosis between the 2 groups (P > .05). Percutaneous kyphoplasty and percutaneous mesh-container-plasty both have significant abilities in functional recovery, height restoration, and segment kyphosis improvement in treating malignant thoracolumbar compression fractures. Percutaneous mesh container-plasty may be better able to relieve pain, inhibit cement leakage, and improve cement distribution than percutaneous kypho plasty. However, percutaneous mesh-container-plasty requires a relatively longer procedure and is more expensive than percutaneous kyphoplasty. Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Bone Cement and Pedicle Screw for the Treatment of Spinal Tumors with Spinal Cord Compression and Posterior Wall Defects.

ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of posterior internal fixation with open vertebroplasty (VP) and posterior internal fixation with open kyphoplasty (KP) in the treatment of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) with posterior wall destruction.MethodsThis retrospective study, conducted between January 2016 and May 2019, equally divided 60 patients with MESCC and posterior wall destruction into two groups based on the surgical method: open vertebroplasty with pedicle screw fixation (VP group) and open kyphoplasty with pedicle screw fixation (KP group). Visual analogue scale (VAS), SF‐36 scores, middle vertebral height (MVH), and posterior vertebral height (PVH) were evaluated for the two groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and 1 year after surgery. Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score, Frankel grades and complications were recorded and evaluated.ResultsFive patients were excluded from the analysis, and our study cohort consisted of 55 adult patients who met the inclusion criteria. The VAS and SF‐36 scores of these two groups of patients significantly improved, when compared with those before the surgery (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in total cost (8835 ± 1468 vs 9540 ± 053 USD) and cement volume (4.51 ± 0.96 ml vs 6.35 ± 1.09 ml) between two groups (P < 0.05). The MVH and PVH of these two groups of patients significantly improved, when compared with those before the surgery (P < 0.05). The MVH was significantly larger in the KP group than in the VP group postoperatively (20.15 ± 4.86 vs 17.70 ± 3.78, P < 0.05) and at the final follow‐up (20.42 ± 5.59 vs 17.28 ± 3.23, P < 0.05). However, the PVH of the two groups did not significantly differ at the two postoperative follow‐ups (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in surgery time, time from surgery to discharge, blood loss and complications between both groups postoperatively (P > 0.05).ConclusionIn the short term, both approaches are effective and safe in patients with MESCC and posterior wall destruction. The posterior internal fixation with open VP may be a good choice of surgical method in patients with MESCC and posterior wall defects.

KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT Introduction: Vertebral fracture is the main complication of osteoporosis and is common among the elderly. Conservative treatment is the first choice for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) but for persistent painful cases, percutaneous vertebral cement augmentation techniques, such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, are indicated. We performed a systematic review to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of both methods. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The PICO search strategy consisted of the following terms: Population- Patients with OVCFs; Intervention- Kyphoplasty; Control- Vertebroplasty; Outcomes- Pain, Cement Leakage, Vertebral Body Height, Adjacent level fractures, Oswestry (ODI) and SF36. Results: Seven articles were included in the qualitative analysis, selecting only randomized controlled trials. Four hundred and fifty patients were treated with vertebroplasty (VP) and 469 with kyphoplasty (KP). The leakage rate of the VP group was 63% versus 14% for the KP group. However, these results were without statistical significance. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ODI and SF-36 outcomes were evaluated based on the 6-month and 1-year follow-up results, and we were unable to find any significant differences between treatments. For restoration of vertebral height, the values of the KP group were, on average, 0.71 cm higher than those of the VP group, with 95% CI. Conclusion: Based on this systematic review, kyphoplasty is superior to vertebroplasty for achieving gains in vertebral body height. As regards cement leakage and other clinical outcomes, neither method showed statistically significant superiority. Level of Evidence I; Systematic review.

FRATURAS OSTEOPORÓTICAS DA COLUNA TRATADOS COM CIFOPLASTIA OU VERTEBROPLASTIA: UMA METANÁLISE

ABSTRACT Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) are both widely adopted treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), however, which of these techniques is more effective has not yet been established. We performed a systematic review of articles, followed by meta-analysis, in an attempt to establish the differences between KP and VP. Initially, 187 articles were obtained, 20 of which were systematically reviewed and submitted to meta-analysis. Thus, 2,226 patients comprised the universe of the present article, 1202 of whom underwent KP and 1024 of whom underwent VP. The statistically significant results observed included lower mean bone cement leakage (ml) in the group submitted to kyphoplasty, with OR: 1.50 [CI95%: 1.16 - 1.95], p &lt;0.05; shorter mean surgical time (minutes), 0.45 [CI90% 0.08 - 0.82], p &lt;0.1, for the group submitted to VP as compared to the KP group; and a lower mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score in the KP group, OR: −0.14 [CI95%: −0.28 - 0.01], p &lt;0.05. KP was more effective in improving physical function and had a lower frequency of cement leakage when compared to VP, although it requires longer surgical time. Level of evidence III; Systematic review of level III studies.

Results of treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty or conservative symptomatic management

Purpose: This nonrandomised study analyzed the results of treatment of painful vertebral fractures in patients with primary osteoporosis with balloon kyphoplasty and compared them with conventional management (control group).&#x0D; Methods: Consecutive patients were enrolled from an outpatient orthopaedic department over a four month period. Eight patients were treated with balloon kyphoplasty and eight with a symptomatic approach (analgesics, bed rest, thoracolumbosacral orthosis). Outcome measures included back pain severity measured on a visual analog scale (VAS), activity level measured on a VAS, bed rest, the SF-36 medical outcomes survey, subject satisfaction, and radiomorphology.&#x0D; Results: Patients reported severe back pain interfering with daily activities before treatment. Physical functioning and quality of life were also markedly impaired. Statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05) improvements in pain and functional outcomes occurred after treatment in the kyphoplasty group. Minor improvements were noted in the control group. Clinical outcomes were significantly different between the groups (P &lt; 0.05). Kyphoplasty increased the midline vertebral height of the treated vertebral bodies, whereas in the control group vertebral height decreased.&#x0D; Conclusion: A positive effect of kyphoplasty over conventional treatment was observed on vertebral morphology and patient satisfaction, pain, level of activity, and overall health perception.

Role of percutaneous vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement in the treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) were considered as relative or even absolute contraindication for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty and these relevant reports are very limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement and conventional kyphoplasty in managing severe OVCFs. 37 patients of severe OVCFs experiencing vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty were reviewed and divided into two groups, according to the procedural technique, 18 in high-viscosity cement percutaneous vertebroplasty (hPVP) group and 19 in conventional percutaneous kyphoplasty (cPKP) group. The operative time, and injected bone cement volume were recorded. Anterior vertebral height (AVH), Cobb angle and cement leakage were also evaluated in the radiograph. The rate of cement leakage was lower in hPVP group, compared with cPKP group (16.7% vs 47.4%, P = 0.046). The patients in cPKP group achieved more improvement in AVH and Cobb angle than those in hPVP group postoperatively (37.2 ± 7.9% vs 43.0 ± 8.9% for AVH, P = 0.044; 15.5 ± 4.7 vs 12.7 ± 3.3, for Cobb angle, P = 0.042). At one year postoperatively, there was difference observed in AVH between two groups (34.1 ± 7.4 vs 40.5 ± 8.7 for hPVP and cPKP groups, P = 0.021), but no difference was found in Cobb angle (16.6 ± 5.0 vs 13.8 ± 3.8, P = 0.068). Similar cement volume was injected in two groups (2.9 ± 0.5 ml vs 2.8 ± 0.6 ml, P = 0.511). However, the operative time was 37.8 ± 6.8 min in the hPVP group, which was shorter than that in the cPKP group (43.8 ± 8.2 min, P = 0.021). In conclusion, conventional PKP achieved better in restoring anterior vertebral height and improving kyphotic angle, but PVP with high-viscosity cement had lower rate of cement leakage and shorter operative time with similar volume of injected cement.

Torakolomber Kırıkların Tedavisinde Torakolomber Yaralanma Sınıflaması ve Şiddet Skoru (TLICS) Kullanımının Sonuçları

Aim: To compare short and long term pain intensity changes and long term loss of correction rates in patients who were treated either by kyphoplasty or posterior segmentation due to their TLICS and LSC scores, therefore evaluate the specificity of these classifications. Material and Methods: Medical records of 106 patients operated due to thoracolumbar compression or burst fracture in our clinics between years 2012 to 2015 have been evaluated retrospectively. The patients were evaluated with postoperative radiography (loss of reduction) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in their follow-ups. Results: The average stay on hospital was 6.53 ± 4.51 days in kyphoplasty group. The mean preoperative cobb angle was 10.76±11.67 degrees, which improved to 10.19±10.66 degrees at postoperative 1th month. Beside this, the mean preoperative VAS score was 7.93±0.68 then improved to 4.25±0.77 and 2.75 ± 1.43 at postoperative 6th, 12th month follow-ups respectively. There were 42 patients in instrumentation group. The mean hospitalization was 13.47±10.43 days. The mean preoperative cobb angle was 15.84±10.52 and it improved to 11.86±8.15 degrees at the postoperative 1th-month follow-up. The preoperative VAS scores of the patients improved from 7.71±0.71 to 4.09±0.79 and 4.26±1.23 at 6th and 12th month follow-ups. Conclusion: In long term follow up the kyphoplasty group showed more loss of correction however lesser VAS scores comparing to the instrumentation group. Although evaluating TLICS scores to kyphoplasty patients is still based on case reports in our series it was performed to 64 patients.

Comparison Between Hyperextension and Neutral Positions for Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Which is Best for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures?

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the demographic features (including total cost), surgical effects, radiographic parameters, and complications of kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) in the hyperextension (HP) and neutral positions (NP) and to assess their efficacy and cost-effectiveness for treating single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 245 consecutive patients who underwent KP or VP from February 2018 to February 2019 with observation on postoperative day 2 and at the one-year follow-up. The first 122 patients (86 KP and 36 VP cases) were treated in the neutral position, and the remaining 123 in the hyperextension position (90 VP and 33 KP cases). Back pain and impact on daily life were evaluated. Cobb’s angle and the ratio of the anterior (AR) and middle vertebral (MR) bodies were the main radiographic parameters. The chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), repeated measurement ANOVA, and post hoc tests (Bonferroni adjustments) were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the demographic features, operation time, or rate of re-fracture at the one-year follow-up among the groups. The rate of cement leakage was significantly lower in the HPVP group than in the NPKP group. The total cost was significantly lower in the VP groups than in the KP groups. At the one-year follow-up, back pain was significantly lower in the HPVP group than in the NPKP group. The Oswestry Disability Index, Cobb’s angle, AR, and MR in the HPVP group were similar to those in the NPKP and HPKP groups, but better than those in the NPVP group.ConclusionHPVP can achieve better pain relief, and similar disability scores, Cobb’s angle, AR and MR recovery, with a lower total cost, compared with NPKP. HPVP is the most economically efficacious treatment for OVCF.

Cement Augmentation for Single-Level Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: Comparison of Vertebroplasty With High-Viscosity Cement and Kyphoplasty

Although the majority of available evidence suggests that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty (KP) can relieve pain associated with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) and improve function, evidence of clinical and radiographic outcome in highly viscous cement vertebroplasty (HVC) or KP for the treatment of VCFs is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effects between HVC and KP in the treatment of single-level osteoporotic VCFs including radiographic and clinical outcomes. From January 2017 to October 2018, 96 patients with single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture who had undergone either KP or HVC surgery at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively, with at least 1 year follow-up. All patients were divided into the HVC group (n= 50) or the KP group (n= 46). Clinical data including clinical and radiologic evaluation results were performed pre- and postoperatively. The operation time of the HVC group (32.24 ±10.08 minutes) was less than that of the KP group (40.76 ± 9.49 minutes), with significant differences. Compared with preoperative data, the visual analog scale scores, Oswestry disability index scores, vertebral body height, and local kyphotic angle were improved after surgery. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in local kyphotic angle, vertebral body height, leakage rate of bone cement, and incidence of adjacent-level vertebra fracture. Restoring the vertebral height and local kyphotic angle corrections of HVC are similar with those of KP. Additionally, KP is not superior in the leakage rate of bone cement and incidence of adjacent-level vertebra fracture compared to HVC.

Percutaneous Balloon Kyphoplasty and Short Instrumentation Compared with Traditional Long Instrumentation for Thoracolumbar Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

A considerable propotion of patients with cancer got thoracolumbar vertebral metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, which affected their quality of life. Traditional surgical management involves early decompression with concomitant spine stabilization with long instrumentation. However, complications are caused by massive blood loss and long operation time. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of short posterior instrumentation with kyphoplasty and the traditional method for thoracolumbar metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Between January 2004 and December 2015, a retrospective study was conducted on 120 patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression from T6 to L5 and divided into 2 groups: short posterior instrumentation with the balloon kyphoplasty group (group I, n= 50) and the long posterior instrumentation group (group II, n= 70). The clinical and radiographic parameters of patients in the 2 groups were compared with a nonrandomized cohort method. Patients were followed up from 3 to 40 months after surgery according to survival time. In group I, the surgery had a mean blood loss of 650 mL and a survival time of 19.1 months. In group II, the surgery had a mean blood loss of 2100 mL and a survival time of 14.14 months. A significant difference in blood loss amount (P= 0.002) was observed. Complications, including deep wound infection, durotomy, and uncontrolled bleeding, were observed in both groups. No postoperative cement-induced neurologic deterioration, implant failure occurred. Kyphoplasty with short posterior instrumentation is a novel technique that can be performed safely and effectively for the treatment of thoracolumbar metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Rigid stability, reduced blood loss, and short fixation decrease surgical morbidity of spinal metastasis.

Intermediate screws or kyphoplasty: Which method of posterior short-segment fixation is better for treating single-level thoracolumbar burst fractures?

To compare intermediate screws (IS) with kyphoplasty (KP) in posterior short-segment fixation (PSSF) for patients with single-level thoracolumbar burst fractures. Between 2010 and 2016, 1465 patients were retrospectively reviewed; 48 patients were enrolled with a minimal follow-up of 2years. Perioperative and functional outcomes were compared. The regional Cobb angle (CA) was included in radiographic analysis. Implant failures or CA correction loss over 10° were regarded as surgical failures. Multiple linear regression was performed to investigate the risk factors of kyphosis recurrence. Fluoroscopic time (23.7 ± 3.6 vs. 79.3 ± 12.1s, p < 0.001), operative time (109.6 ± 13.1 vs. 123.8 ± 19.0min, p = 0.006) and blood loss (104.6 ± 34.9 vs. 129.1 ± 21.7ml, p = 0.005) were all lower in the IS group. The KP group had lower Visual Analogue Scale scores (3.3 ± 0.9 vs. 2.7 ± 0.8, p = 0.028) and greater anterior body height (ABH) (30.3 ± 9.0 vs. 36.3 ± 11.0%, p = 0.044) after surgery, and less correction loss (5.6 ± 2.7 vs. 0.4 ± 1.2%, p < 0.001). Both groups had a CA correction loss of 4° with a 10% failure rate. The A3 Magerl subclassification, smaller preoperative ABH and smaller postoperative CA had positive correlations with CA correction loss. PSSF with KP provides better back pain relief, greater ABH reduction and less correction loss, while IS has the advantages of less operative time, fluoroscopic time and blood loss. Magerl subclassification of burst fracture is a potential predictor for recurrent kyphosis. Reducing fractured vertebral body height rather than segmental curvature may be more important in PSSF. Retrospective, non-randomized controlled study. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Delayed Height Loss After Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture with Severe Collapse: Comparison with Vertebroplasty

To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications after vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with severe collapse. Patients >65 years old with single osteoporotic vertebral fracture (T10-L2) with severe collapse (>40%) were prospectively enrolled and allocated to either KP or VP. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index were used for clinical assessment. Vertebral height loss (HL) and segmental kyphotic angle were measured radiographically at preoperative; postoperative; and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative time points. Procedure-related and postoperative complications were recorded. Forty-six patients (27 with VP, 19 with KP) were enrolled. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were similar at all time points in the 2 groups. Complication rates were also similar. HL and kyphotic angle were restored significantly in both groups. KP showed a better result in HL (KP group HL 20.5% ± 5.6% vs. VP group HL 29.8% ± 4.6%, P < 0.001). Progressive vertebral HL was observed, and patients with KP showed a greater collapse in height. At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in vertebral height (KP group HL 29.8% ± 6.3% vs. VP group HL 33.0% ± 5.2%, P= 0.075). KP and VP showed similar improvements in pain and disability during treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Although vertebral height and segmental kyphotic angle were restored significantly in both groups, progressive vertebral HL was inevitable, especially after KP. This likely resulted from the difference of bone-cement interface as a consequence of balloon tamping in KP. Surgeons must consider the respective features of vertebral augmentations.

Single-level vertebral kyphoplasty is not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic secondary adjacent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a matched case–control analysis

To compare the rate of new symptomatic adjacent-level fractures within 1year after an isolated osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) treated by either kyphoplasty or non-operative treatment. Patients aged ≥ 50years with an isolated, fresh, and symptomatic osteoporotic VCF who were treated by kyphoplasty were compared to patients of similar age, gender, vertebral segment, and bone mineral density who were treated non-operatively (n = 98). A matched case-control analysis was conducted by retrospective chart review, and the rate of new adjacent-level symptomatic vertebral fractures, defined as occurring within two segments of the index fracture, within the first year was determined. Ninety-eight patients (66 female, aged 73.5, SD 9.7years) were analyzed in this matched case-control study. The adjacent fracture rate within 1year was not different between the kyphoplasty group and the non-operative group (20.4 vs 18.4%; McNemar, p = 1.0). The time to a new adjacent fracture after the index fracture was significantly shorter in the kyphoplasty (7, SD 8weeks) versus non-operative group (22, SD 13weeks). Patients with osteoporotic VCFs treated with kyphoplasty did not show an increased rate of additional symptomatic adjacent-level VCFs when compared to a non-operative control group matched for age, gender, fracture level, and bone mineral density. Level III.

Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Treatment-Related Decision Making for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to analyze the impact and usefulness of characteristic signal change of a linear black signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on treatment-related decision making.Material/MethodsForty-one patients with a linear black signal on MRI were enrolled in this prospective study. They were randomly divided into the percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) group (n=24) and the conservative treatment group (n=17). Clinical measures, including visual analog scale (VAS) and short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, were analyzed. Radiographic measures, including anterior vertebral body height, kyphosis angle and rate of bone-union, were evaluated.ResultsVAS scores were significantly lower in the PKP group than in the conservative treatment group post-treatment and at one-year follow-up. After one year of treatment, the values for physical functioning, physical health, and body pain were significantly higher in the PKP group than in the conservative treatment group (p<0.05). The PKP group had a significantly higher anterior vertebral body height, rate of bone-union, and lower kyphosis angle than the conservative treatment group at one-year follow-up (p<0.05).ConclusionsIn patients with a linear black signal detected on MRI, the first-choice treatment should be PKP rather than conservative treatment.

Effect of Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Compared to Vertebroplasty – Overview of Systematic Reviews

Introduction Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are possible options for vertebral augmentation after osteoporotic fractures. Both are percutaneous techniques with specific advantages and disadvantages. Our aim is to compare the clinical and radiological results of these two procedures. Methods An overview of published systematic reviews in the literature on the effects of kyphoplasty compared with vertebroplasty was performed. Results After short and long follow-up, the kyphoplasty group had lower pain scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS), lower scores in the Oswestry Disability index (ODI), greater restoration of the vertebral body height and lower kyphosis angle in the immediate postoperative period. There was less leakage of cement to the vertebral canal and extraspinal spaces. Conclusions Compared with vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty achieved better results in pain relief, quality of life, correction of spinal deformity and lower risk of cement leakage.