Knowledge Of Results Frequency Research Articles

Self-Controlled Feedback in Motor Learning: The Effects Depend on the Frequency of Request

The benefits of allowing learners to control when to receive knowledge of results (KR) compared to a yoked group has been recently challenged and postulated to be mild at best. A potential explanation for such dissident findings is that individuals differentially utilize the autonomy provided by the self-controlled condition, which, in its turn, affects the outcomes. Therefore, the present study investigated the effects of self-controlled KR on motor learning focusing on the frequency of KR requests when performing an anticipatory timing task. Self-controlled groups were created based on participants’ KR frequency of request (High, Medium, and Low referring to fifth, third, and first quintile) and, then, Yoked groups were created self-control condition pairing the KR request of the Self-controlled groups. We also measured self-efficacy and processing time as means to verify potential correlates. The results supported the expected interaction. While no difference between self-controlled and yoked groups were found for low frequencies of KR, a moderate amount of KR request was related to better results for the self-controlled group. Nonetheless, the opposite trend was observed for high frequencies of KR; the yoked group was superior to the self-controlled group. The results of this study allow us to conclude that the choices made, and not just the possibility of choosing, seem to define the benefits of KR self-control in motor learning.

Effect of Practice Structure and Feedback Frequency on Voice Motor Learning in Older Adults

The long-term goal of this research is to advance the rehabilitation of voice disorders through the study and development of efficacious treatment regimes based upon motor learning principles. This study examined the effect of contextual interference (CI) of practice structure with knowledge of results (KR) feedback on motor learning of a novel voice task, "Twang," by hypophonic, novice, and expert older adults. Prospective, randomized controlled mixed design. A total of 92 adults, age 55-80, recruited from the following motor skill levels: 1) Hypophonic voice; 2) Novice-untrained vocalists; 3) Expert-trained vocalists were randomly assigned to four different interventions and examined during acquisition, retention, and transfer phases of motor learning. Participants from each skill-level practiced the novel task, "Twang," according to the randomly assigned Practice Structure/KR combinations: 1) Blocked practice/100%KR; 2) Blocked practice/55% KR; 3) Random practice/100%KR; 4) Random practice/55% KR. During the motor performance phase, our results mirrored those reported in the limb motor learning literature for CI: A Blocked practice structure enhanced short-term effects of motor acquisition for novice, expert, and hypophonic subjects. The only significant result for KR occurred when paired with Random Practice in the hypophonic subject group: 100% KR paired with Blocked practice increased motor performance, but degraded motor learning. Fundamental motor learning principles were explored within the context of a voice training paradigm. Practice with a high CI and low frequency of KR degraded performance during short-term acquisition but enhanced long-term performance effects of motor learning. Voice clinicians and teachers may benefit by implementing motor learning theory into practice during training and treatment sessions.

The Effects of Manipulating Task Difficulty and Feedback Frequency on Children's Dart Throwing Accuracy and Consistency.

In the present study we investigated the effects of manipulating task difficulty (constant vs. progressive difficulty) and frequency of knowledge of results (KR) on the accuracy and consistency of children's performance of a novel fine motor coordination task (dart throwing). We assigned 69 right-handed physical education (PE) students (M age = 10.73, SD = 0.89 years) to progressive (PDG) or constant difficulty (CDG) groups. PDG and CDG were each split into three subgroups who received varying KR frequency (100%KR, 50%KR, and 33%KR), creating a total of six groups. We increased difficulty in the PDG by manipulating the distance to the target (2 m, 2.37 m, and 3.56 m), while distance to the target was constant for CDG throughout the experiment (2.37 m). We conducted performance assessments during familiarization (pre-test), acquisition (post-test), and retention (retention testing) learning phases under both normal condition (NC) and a time pressure condition (TPC). Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of difficulty manipulation on skill learning under both NC and TPC. Further analyses revealed that skill learning was enhanced by progressive difficulty manipulation. However, learning was not affected by KR frequency changes. Progressive difficulty practice enhanced both accuracy and consistency, specifically at retention testing. These results suggest that motor learning in children may be enhanced by practicing with progressive increases in difficulty. PE teachers are encouraged to gradually introduce difficulty levels in motor learning tasks that require high accuracy.

Effects of normative feedback on motor learning are dependent on the frequency of knowledge of results

Studies on normative feedback have shown superior motor learning outcomes for individuals who believe that they are performing better than others through increased self-efficacy. Nevertheless, the effects of normative feedback were never dissociated from the knowledge of results (KR) provided to the learners which potentially interacts with self-efficacy as well. Thus, we investigated whether the effects of normative feedback on motor learning, associated with self-efficacy, would be dependent on the amount of KR provided. Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to four experimental groups in terms of KR frequency (100% and 33%) and normative feedback (positive and negative). In the acquisition phase, all groups received the average KR of their performance at the end of each block of trials (True feedback) and a fake KR based on their own performance (but said to be from a group of participants who practiced the same task) (False Feedback). The False Feedback indicated better or worse performance of the participant in comparison to the fake group, depending on their experimental group. Retention tests were performed immediately and after 24 h from the acquisition phase. To measure self-efficacy, a questionnaire on participant's efficacy was applied before the first block, after each block of trials and before the retention tests. The results revealed superiority of positive normative feedback and 100% KR frequency, compared to negative normative feedback and 100% KR frequency in the 24h retention test. No difference was found between the groups with a frequency of 33% of KR (positive and negative). All groups increased self-efficacy during practice, but there was no difference between groups at any stage of the study. We conclude that the effects of normative feedback on motor learning are dependent on the KR frequency. However, they were not associated with self-efficacy.

Effects of Knowledge of Results (KR) Frequency in the Learning of a Timing Skill: Absolute versus Relative KR Frequency

The interaction between the amount of practice and frequency of Knowledge of Results (KR) was investigated in a timing skill. In the acquisition phase the task involved 90 trials of releasing a knob and transporting three tennis balls from three near recipients to three far ones in a specific sequence and target time. The retention test performed 24 hr. later had the same sequence of transport but a new target time was required. In both phases, absolute error and standard deviation plus constant error was measured. The five groups differed in relation to frequency of KR and amount of practice. The results showed that intermediate frequencies as well as higher frequencies of KR elicited better performance during the retention test.

Efeitos do conhecimento de resultados autocontrolado na aprendizagem motora

O objetivo do presente estudo foi analisar três diferentes estratégias de fornecer conhecimento de resultados (CR): autocontrolado, yoked pareado por tentativa e yoked pareado pela frequência média total de CR, na prática aleatória. A amostra foi constituída por 45 voluntários universitários, distribuídos em três grupos (n= 15 sujeitos). A tarefa consistiu em pressionar as teclas 2, 4, 8 e 6 do teclado numérico de um computador, em três diferentes tempos alvo (700, 900 e 1100 ms), praticados aleatoriamente. O experimento constou de fase de aquisição e testes de retenção e transferência atrasados. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio da ANOVA e não foi constatada diferença significativa entre os grupos. Os resultados demonstraram que não houve efeito das frequências autocontroladas para a aprendizagem motora quando se utiliza a prática aleatória. Além disso, uma nova possibilidade de parear o grupo autocontrolado foi apresentada.

Frequency and precision of feedback and the adaptive process of learning a dual motor task

This work investigated the effects of frequency and precision of feedback on the learning of a dual-motor task. One hundred and twenty adults were randomly assigned to six groups of different knowledge of results (KR), frequency (100%, 66% or 33%) and precision (specific or general) levels. In the stabilization phase, participants performed the dual task (combination of linear positioning and manual force control) with the provision of KR. Ten non-KR adaptation trials were performed for the same task, but with the introduction of an electromagnetic opposite traction force. The analysis showed a significant main effect for frequency of KR. The participants who received KR in 66% of the stabilization trials showed superior adaptation performance than those who received 100% or 33%. This finding reinforces that there is an optimal level of information, neither too high nor too low, for motor learning to be effective.

Interaction of Feedback Frequency and Task Difficulty in Children's Motor Skill Learning

Providing adults with knowledge of results (KR) after each practice trial (100% KR) usually is found to be detrimental to motor skill learning compared with conditions in which feedback is less frequently provided. The effect of 100% KR on children's learning is less clear, with research showing that children with cerebral palsy benefit from less frequent KR, whereas children with typical development do not. This study was designed to examine the interaction of KR frequency and task complexity on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a novel throwing skill in fourth- and fifth-grade children with typical development. This was an observational study. Children threw beanbags for accuracy at an unseen target while walking or while standing still. These 2 levels of task complexity were crossed with 2 frequencies (33% and 100%) of KR provision. Following practice, retention tests without feedback were performed 5 minutes later and then 1 week later along with transfer tests to assess the generalizability of learning. Analyses revealed that learning was improved on the easy version of the task when a 33% KR frequency was provided during practice. In contrast, in the difficult version, learning was facilitated by provision of a 100% KR frequency during practice. Structuring practice conditions for children should take into account task complexity and feedback frequency in determining the cognitive challenge necessary for optimal skill learning. More generally, the findings suggest that practitioners teaching motor skills should design practice conditions in accordance with the cognitive processing capacity of the learner.

Feedback Schedules for Motor-Skill Learning: The Similarities and Differences between Physical and Observational Practice

ABSTRACT In 2 experiments, the authors assessed different knowledge of results (KR) schedules for observational and physical practice. In Experiment 1, participants had to learn a sequence timing task under either a bandwidth (KR being delivered when participants’ performance was outside a predefined bandwidth or range) or yoked (same number of KRs provided as the bandwidth group) KR procedure. The results show that for both practice conditions the bandwidth KR schedule was more effective in promoting learning than the yoked schedule. During Experiment 2, a KR frequency was controlled (100% or 33% KR) and the data indicate that a reduced KR frequency only enhanced the learning of observers. Because a low KR frequency improves the sensory process controlling motor learning, the authors propose that action observation may be perceptual in nature.

Reduced Frequency of Knowledge of Results Enhances Learning in Persons with Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder, known to cause a large number of motor and non-motor limitations. Research related to factors that affect motor control and learning in people with PD is still relatively limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different frequencies (100 versus 66%) of knowledge of results (KR) on the learning of a motor skill with spatial demands in participants with PD. Twenty individuals with PD were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The 100% group received KR after each trial, while the 66% group received KR on two thirds of the trials. A linear positioning task with a spatial target was used. Participants carried out the task with the dominant hand while blindfolded. In the acquisition and retention phases, the goal was to position the cursor at a distance of 60 cm from the starting point. The hypothesis was that participants with PD, who practiced with a reduced KR frequency, would demonstrate more effective learning than those who practiced with a 100% KR frequency, similar to previous findings with adults without neurological disorders. The results showed differences between the groups in the retention phase (without KR): The 66% KR group was more accurate and less variable in their performance than the 100% KR group. Thus, reducing KR frequency can enhance motor learning in persons with PD, similar to what has previously been found for unimpaired participants.

Specificity of practice: Interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback.

In 2 experiments, the authors investigated a potential interaction involving the processing of concurrent feedback using design features from the specificity of practice literature and the processing of terminal feedback using a manipulation from the guidance hypothesis literature. In Experiment 1, participants produced (198 trials) flexion-extension movements to reproduce a specific pattern of displacement over time with or without vision of the limb position and with 100% or 33% knowledge of results (KR) frequency. The transfer test was performed without vision and KR. In Experiment 2, the authors assessed whether sensory information processing was modulated by the amount of practice. Participants performed 54 or 396 trials under a 100% or a 33% KR frequency with vision before being transferred to a no-vision condition without KR. Results of both experiments indicated that the Vision-33% condition suffered a larger detrimental effect of withdrawing visual information than the Vision-100% condition. Experiment 2 indicated that this detrimental effect increased with practice. These results indicated the reduction in terminal feedback prompted participants to more deeply process the concurrent visual information thus reinforcing their dependency on the visual information.

Reduced Feedback: Motor Learning Strategy in Persons with Alzheimer's Disease

This study investigated various frequencies of feedback known as knowledge of results (KR) in learning a motor skill. Participants included 21 persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 19 age-matched and education level-matched well elderly individuals who were randomly assigned to two groups; a 100% KR or 33% KR group. The task involved turning a knob that controlled the height of a column on a computer screen to match the height of a target column. Participants with AD who experienced the 33% KR condition performed significantly better in the retention and transfer tasks than those who experienced the 100% KR condition. This suggests that reduced frequency of KR may facilitate the retention and generalization of simple motor skills in persons with mid to moderate levels of AD. Replicating this study using a larger sample size will provide stronger evidence to help guide effective treatment protocols that facilitate motor skill performance.

Error Detection Processes During Observational Learning

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether a faded knowledge of results (KR) frequency during observation of a model's performance enhanced error detection capabilities. During the observation phase, participants observed a model performing a timing task and received KR about the model's performance on each trial or on one of two trials. Delayed retention and transfer tests were used to assess the observer's ability to detect error in the model's performance and in the participant's performance while physically practicing the task. Results indicated a beneficial effect of a reduced KR frequency for performance stability and the ability to detect errors in both the model and the participant's own performance. The results suggest that aspects of the processing mechanism(s) developed in observational learning and related to KR are probably similar to those developed through physical practice.

Error Detection Processes During Observational Learning

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether a faded knowledge of results (KR) frequency during observation of a model's performance enhanced error detection capabilities. During the observation phase, participants observed a model performing a timing task and received KR about the model's performance on each trial or on one of two trials. Delayed retention and transfer tests were used to assess the observer's ability to detect error in the model's performance and in the participant's performance while physically practicing the task. Results indicated a beneficial effect of a reduced KR frequency for performance stability and the ability to detect errors in both the model and the participant's own performance. The results suggest that aspects of the processing mechanism(s) developed in observational learning and related to KR are probably similar to those developed through physical practice.

Effects of relative frequency and delay interval of knowledge of results (KR) in the acquisition of motor skills


 The purpose of the present study was to identify the effects of relative frequency and delay interval of Knowledge of Results (KR) in the acquisition of a serial motor skill. Sixty students were randomly distributed in 2 experiments, with three groups in each experiment (n = 10). The Experiment 1 investigated the effects of the KR frequency without KR delay interval and the Experiment 2 investigated the effects of the KR frequency with KR delay interval (3 seconds) in the acquisition of a serial motor skill. The serial task consisted of putting a tennis ball into six holes, positioned in a wood platform in a previously determined target time. In both experiments, the subjects performed 60 trials in target time of 2,700 ms, in the acquisition phase. In the Experiment 1, the results showed superiority of G33 in relation to the other groups, during the tests. In the Experiment 2, the results did not show any difference among the groups. These results are discussed with respect to the effect of KR delay interval, showing the role of combination of the variables.
 

Frequency of knowledge of results and motor learning in persons with developmental delay

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of high versus low frequency knowledge of results (KR) in a group of 16 individuals with developmental delay and in gender and age-matched average individuals learning a motor skill on a laptop computer. Participants were randomly assigned to either a 100% KR or a 50% KR group. KR was provided during the acquisition phase according to group assignment as participants learned the motor skill, whereas no KR was provided during the retention phase. Results indicated both populations who received 50% KR in the acquisition phase demonstrated better performance in the retention phase than those who received 100% KR. The results of this study suggest that, as has been found in the average population, feedback that is too frequent can interfere with learning and retention of tasks for individuals with developmental disabilities (DD). Limitations involved the small sample size along with the task potentially being artificial in nature. Future research is needed to study further the effects of frequency of KR on skill acquisition, particularly in instrumental activities of daily living in this population.

Motor Learning Strategies for Well Elderly: A Pilot Study

Although motor learning strategies have been studied throughout the 20th century, relatively little is known about motor learning strategies that are specifically effective for older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare the skill acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skills in older persons on relatively easy and relatively difficult tasks across varying frequencies of knowledge of results (KR). It was hypothesized that there would be a significant interaction upon task learning between frequency of KR and task difficulty for the acquisition, retention, and transfer phases. Participants included 61 right-hand dominant, well, elderly individuals, aged 60 to 87 years. The task involved turning a knob that controlled the height of a bar on a computer screen to match the height of a target bar. The target bar height and the time interval of the target bar were manipulated into four groups including the 100% KR/easy task, the 100% KR/hard task, the 33% KR/easy task and the 33% KR/hard groups. Participants were randomly assigned to these four groups. Although there was no significant interaction between group and time for the retention phase (p >.05), there were significant interactions in the acquisition and transfer phases between group and time (p <.05). The acquisition phase had a large disparity during the initial performance with the reduced KR groups having greater error that was eliminated in the final acquisition trials. In the transition phase, the 33% feedback/hard group demonstrated better performance across the trials than the other three groups. Based on these results, it may be beneficial to employ a reduced frequency feedback schedule when learning relatively difficult tasks for subsequent generalization of those learned skills by an elderly population, though more research beyond this pilot study is needed to corroborate these findings.

Motor Learning Strategies for Well Elderly: A Pilot Study

Although motor learning strategies have been studied throughout the 20th century, relatively little is known about motor learning strategies that are specifically effective for older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare the skill acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skills in older persons on relatively easy and relatively difficult tasks across varying frequencies of knowledge of results (KR). It was hypothesized that there would be a significant interaction upon task learning between frequency of KR and task difficulty for the acquisition, retention, and transfer phases. Participants included 61 right-hand dominant, well, elderly individuals, aged 60 to 87 years. The task involved turning a knob that controlled the height of a bar on a computer screen to match the height of a target bar. The target bar height and the time interval of the target bar were manipulated into four groups including the 100% KR/easy task, the 100% KR/hard task, the 33% KR/easy task and the 33% KR/hard groups. Participants were randomly assigned to these four groups. Although there was no significant interaction between group and time for the retention phase (p >.05), there were significant interactions in the acquisition and transfer phases between group and time (p <.05). The acquisition phase had a large disparity during the initial performance with the reduced KR groups having greater error that was eliminated in the final acquisition trials. In the transition phase, the 33% feedback/hard group demonstrated better performance across the trials than the other three groups. Based on these results, it may be beneficial to employ a reduced frequency feedback schedule when learning relatively difficult tasks for subsequent generalization of those learned skills by an elderly population, though more research beyond this pilot study is needed to corroborate these findings.

Frequency effects of knowledge of results in learning of a motor task with spatial control demands in visual impairment people

The objective of the present study was to verify the effects of knowledge of results (KR) frequency in learning of a motor skill of adults with visual impairment. Nineteen subjects were distributed into two groups in relation to the diverse conditions of KR frequency used. The 100% frequency group received KR after each trial, while the 50% frequency group received KR in half of the trials. A linear positioning task was used, with spatial control demand. The tested hypothesis is that subjects with visual impediments, who practiced with reduced KR frequency, will demonstrate a higher learning than subjects who practiced with 100% KR, according to the previous results in adults without visual impairments. The data analysis carried out through the ANOVA, exhibit no differences between the groups, showing that reduced frequencies are so effective as high frequencies in the learning of a motor skill in adults with visual impairment.

Knowledge of Results for Motor Learning: Relationship Between Error Estimation and Knowledge of Results Frequency

The authors of the present study investigated the apparent contradiction between early and more recent views of knowledge of results (KR), the idea that how one is engaged before receiving KR may not be independent of how one uses that KR. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, participants (N = 64) practiced a simple force-production task and (a) were required, or not required, to estimate error about their previous response and (b) were provided KR either after every response (100%) or after every 5th response (20%) during acquisition. A no-KR retention test revealed an interaction between acquisition error estimation and KR frequencies. The group that received 100% KR and was required to error estimate during acquisition performed the best during retention. The 2 groups that received 20% KR performed less well. Finally, the group that received 100% KR and was not required to error estimate during acquisition performed the poorest during retention. One general interpretation of that pattern of results is that motor learning is an increasing function of the degree to which participants use KR to test response hypotheses (J. A. Adams, 1971; R. A. Schmidt, 1975). Practicing simple responses coupled with error estimation may embody response hypotheses that can be tested with KR, thus benefiting motor learning most under a 100% KR condition. Practicing simple responses without error estimation is less likely to embody response hypothesis, however, which may increase the probability that participants will use KR to guide upcoming responses, thus attenuating motor learning under a 100% KR condition. The authors conclude, therefore, that how one is engaged before receiving KR may not be independent of how one uses KR.