Knee Injury And Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Scores Research Articles

The Effectiveness of Herbal Poultice in Relieving Pain and Flexibility in Osteoarthritis Patients

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition that causes joint degradation and primarily affects the elderly, reducing their quality of life and physical movements. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of Thai herbal poultice in relieving pain in OA patients. A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted amongst OA patients at Integrative medicine clinic, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Thailand. Participants were randomly allocated to the Thai herbal poultice or the diclofenac gel group (N=30). The main outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS), isokinetic testing, goniometer, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores (KOOS) at different time assessment. Data were analyzed by the paired t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Thai herbal poultice and diclofenac group showed a significant difference in both the VAS pain scores, extension and flexion as well as KOOS scores (P < 0.01 in both groups). In addition, when compared to diclofenac group, Thai herbal poultice group were significantly improve pain score at the sixth time point following the intervention (P < 0.01). Furthermore, no patients have experienced allergic reactions to therapies. In conclusion, Thai herbal poultice showed more efficiency in reducing pain scores than diclofenac gel without causing undesirable side effects.

An observational retrospective study on safety and functional outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Sironix suture button and interference screw

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a persistent orthopaedic condition that affects a wide spectrum of people. ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) stands out as the primary treatment option. Graft fixation with suture buttons and interference screws has proven to be a highly successful and reliable method for ACL-R. In this context, our research aims to assess the safety and functional outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R using the Sironix suture button and interference screw. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R using Sironix suture button and interference screw (January 2018-March 2022) were included in the study. Functional outcomes of patients were evaluated using the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) assessment, the Tegner activity scale (TAS), the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the modified knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) quality of life subscale, and the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) score. Adverse events, if any, were recorded. Results: All patients achieved excellent outcome measures for IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm, KOOS, and SANE scores. The mean (SD) IKDC score was 88.76 (7.16), Tegner activity score was 5.9 (1.13), while the Lysholm score was 96.9 (6.56). The overall KOOS score was 93.7 (7.52), and the overall SANE score for the affected joint was 94.5 (7.22). Conclusions: Arthroscopic ACL-R using Sironix implants (Helysis titanium interference screw, Helysis PLDLA+β-TCP interference screw, Infiloop fixed loop UHMWPE suture titanium button, Proloop adjustable loop UHMWPE suture Titanium button, and Titanium suture disc) demonstrated safety and good functional outcomes.

Improved Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Aged 16 and Younger at Two Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Despite Relatively High Rates of Reinjury and Repeat Surgery.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in adolescent patients, particularly those aged 16 and under, are increasingly common procedure that lacks robust clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. The purpose of this study was to report 2-year PROs of patients receiving ACLR aged 16 or younger using the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Secondary aims included characterizing treatment characteristics, return to sport (RTS), and clinical outcomes. The institutional PRO database was queried for patients receiving ACLR from 2009 to 2020. Patients aged older than 16, revision procedures, concomitant ligament repairs/reconstructions, and patients without full outcome data at 2 years were excluded. Outcomes over 2 years after ACLR included SANE, KOOS, reinjuries, reoperations, and time to RTS. A total of 98 patients were included with an average age of 15.0 years. Most patients were females (77.6%). Bone-tendon-bone autograft (69.4%) was the most used. Average RTS was 8.7 months (range: 4.8 to 24.0mo), with 90% of patients eventually returning to sport. A total of 23 patients (23.5%) experienced a reinjury and 24.5% (n = 24) underwent reoperation. Timing to RTS was not associated with reinjury, but patients who returned between 9.5 and 13.7 months did not sustain reinjuries. Mean KOOS and SANE scores at 2 years were 87.1 and 89.1, respectively, with an average improvement of +18.4 and +22.9, respectively. Change in KOOS was negatively impacted by reinjury to the anterior cruciate ligament graft and reoperation (anterior cruciate ligament failure: +10.0 vs 19.3, P = 0.081, respectively; reoperation: +13.2 vs +20.1, P = 0.051, respectively), though these did not reach statistical significance. Patients experienced improved SANE and KOOS scores after ACLR. Rates of reinjury and reoperation were relatively high and negatively impacted PRO scores but were not associated with the timing of RTS. Adolescent patients should be counseled regarding the risk of subsequent ipsilateral and contralateral knee injury after ACLR. Level IV-case series.

A Comparative Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Versus Conservative Treatment.

Background The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury with an incidence of 68.6 in 100,000 patients per year. Despite extensive research on ACL rupture, there are insufficient high-quality studies to determine clear treatment strategies for adults lacking the ACL. This study aims to examine the functional differences between surgical and conservative treatment based on the quality of the surgical process. Methodology In this prospective, comparative study, a total of 136 patients aged between 18 and 35 years were enrolled per inclusion and exclusion criteria. Using the lottery system, patients were dividedinto the following two groups: group A (n = 71) and group B (n = 65). Group A was treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation, whereas group B was treated conservatively (rehabilitation). Patient data, including age, sex, body mass index, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Level (TAL) score, and complications were recorded and compared. Results The demographic data were comparable, where males had dominancy in both groups. The mean IKDC and KOOS scores were higher in group A at all follow-ups compared to group B. The scores gradually increased at every follow-up till six months. At the final follow-up, the IKDC and KOOS scores were higher in group A than in group B, and a significant difference was observed among both groups. The TAL score also gradually increased at every follow-up till 6 months. At the final follow-up, the TAL score was higher in group A than in group B, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0032). Complications in both groups were comparable. Conclusions This study showed that both the conservatively treated group and the rebuilt group had identical outcomes, with the exception of the conservative group having greater objectively quantifiable instability. However, at the final follow-up, patients reported feeling just as satisfied with their knee without surgery, demonstrating no subjective difference in activity levels or functional outcomes. Therefore, non-athletes with an ACL-insufficient knee should still choose conservative treatment.

Clinical outcome of iterative meniscal suture after ACL reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up

IntroductionFailure rates in meniscal suture associated to ACL reconstruction range from 10 to 26.9%, often leading to meniscectomy. In young patients, the wish to conserve the meniscus may lead to iterative suture, if the lesion allows. There are no data available for clinical results of repeat meniscal suture at the same site as the primary lesion in a stabilized knee. The immediate socioeconomic cost, compared to meniscectomy, needs to be taken into account, and benefit needs to be demonstrated. The main aim of the present study was to assess the rate of secondary meniscectomy after iterative meniscal suture in stabilized knees. The study hypothesis was that failure rates are higher in iterative isolated meniscal suture after ligament reconstruction than in primary repair. Material and methodsThis single-center retrospective study analyzed patients receiving iterative meniscal suture on stable knee, between 2009 and 2019, with a minimum 26 months’ follow-up. Twenty-three patients were analyzed: 15 male, 8 female; mean age at iterative suture, 28.1±7.9 years (range, 14–49 years); mean BMI, 24.2±2.9kg/m2 (range, 19–31). Mean time to recurrence was 38.9±25.1 months (range, 6–93 months). Initial ACL graft used the patellar ligament in 69.6% of cases (n=16) and the hamstrings in 30.4% (n=7). Mean differential laximetry before iterative suture was 1.7±0.3mm (range, 1.2–2.3mm). Iterative suture was in the medial meniscus in 69.6% of cases (16/23) and in the lateral meniscus in 30.4% (7/23). Risk factors for failure, defined by requirement for meniscectomy, were assessed. Functional results were assessed on Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Tegner score. ResultsThe failure rate was 48% (11/23), incorporating all lesions together. Bucket-handle tear was most frequently associated with failure (91%; p<0.01). There was significant improvement after iterative suture in subjective IKDC score (51.6±15.2 vs. 81.3±15.6; p<0.001) and KOOS scores: symptoms and stiffness, 66.6±13.7 vs. 91.1±7.53 (p<0.001); pain, 79.2±12.7 vs. 93.4±7.4 (p<0.01); function, 91.3±11.2 vs. 97.9±4.44 (p<0.001); quality of life, 38.1±23.2 vs. 62.3±30.1 (p<0.001). ConclusionThe failure rate for iterative meniscal suture on stabilized knee was 48%. Bucket-handle tear was a major risk factor for failure (91%). Despite these high failure rates, functional results systematically improved. Level of evidenceIV.

Satisfactory outcomes after one-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using rectangular tunnel technique.

One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the anatomic rectangular tunnel (RT) technique using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts results in anatomically precise tunnel placement and secure graft fixation. This study evaluated knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes in terms of femoral tunnel overlap. It was hypothesised that there would be no significant differences in knee joint laxity or clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap. Between 2012 and 2021, a single surgeon conducted 196 one-stage revision ACLRs with the RT technique using BTB grafts. Patients were divided based on the presence of femoral tunnel overlap. Knee joint laxity was evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and side-to-side difference measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form 2000. Knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes were compared between groups after a median follow-up of 2.5years (range 2.0-8.0). The study included 30 and 73 patients in the overlap and non-overlap groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the results of the Lachman test, pivot shift test, or KT-1000 arthrometer as well as in the Lysholm, KOOS, or IKDC scores between the two groups. Based on the IKDC scores, all patients were graded as normal or nearly normal. One-stage revision ACLR with the RT technique using BTB grafts improved knee joint laxity and had favourable clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap. To achieve optimal results in one-stage revision ACLR, it is crucial to create a tunnel within the anatomical attachment area and ensure proper graft fixation and tensioning. III.

Restoration of preoperative tibial alignment improves functional results after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The alignment obtained after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) influences the risk of failure. Kinematic alignment after UKA based on Cartier angle restauration is likely to improve clinical outcomes compared with mechanical alignment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of implant alignment and native knee restoration after UKA using the conventional techniques on clinical outcomes. This retrospective study included 144 medial UKA patients from 2015 to 2020. Radiographic measurements were performed pre- and postoperatively. Outliers were defined as follows: Δ Cartier > 3° (difference between the preoperative and postoperative Cartier angle); Δ MPTA (Medial Proximal Tibial angle) and postoperative TCA (Tibial Coronal component Angle) > 3° (difference between the positioning of the tibial implant and the preoperative proximal tibial deformity). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Society (IKS) Function and Knee score, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and the Subjective Knee Value (SKV) were evaluated. A Student t test or a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for non-normal data to compare pre- and postoperative values for functional scores and angular measurements. The correlation of postoperative angles with functional outcomes was assessed by the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. During the inclusion period, 214 patients underwent medial UKA, 71 patients were excluded, and 19 were lost to follow-up leaving 124 patients with 144 knees (20 bilateral UKA) included for analysis with a mean follow-up of 54.7months ± 22.1 (24-95). The Δ Cartier was significantly correlated with IKS function (R2 = 0.06, p < 0.001) and FJS (R2 = 0.05, p < 0.01) scores. The Δ preoperative MPTA-TCA was significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with KOOS (R2 = 0.38), IKS Knee (R2 = 0.17), IKS function (R2 = 0.34), SKV (R2 = 0.08), and FJS (R2 = 0.37) scores. In subgroup analysis, non-outliers (< 3°) for Δ preoperative MPTA-TCA had better KOOS score (Δ = 23.5, p < 0.001) and IKS Function (Δ = 17.7, p < 0.001) compared to outliers (> 3°) patients. Functional results after medial UKA can be influenced by implant alignment in the coronal plane with slight clinical improvement when positioning the tibial implant close to the preoperative tibial deformity, rather than by restoring the Cartier angle. This series suggests the interest of a more personalized alignment strategy, but these results will have to be confirmed by other controlled studies. IV, retrospective case series.

Effects of a Hybrid Teaching Program on Lower Limb Muscle Strength, Knee Function, and Depression in Older Adults After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of a nurse-led hybrid teaching program on lower limb strength, knee function, and depression in older adults after total knee replacement (TKR). This was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Fifty-two patients who underwent TKR were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (EG; n = 26), which received routine care plus 16 weeks of home rehabilitation through a hybrid teaching program, or the control group (CG; n = 26), which received routine care only. The intervention included pre-discharge face-to-face education, video instructions to follow at home after discharge, and four monthly telephone-based follow ups during the 16 weeks post-surgery. After the 16-week intervention, participants in the EG exhibited improved quadriceps strength, hamstring strength, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) compared to those in the CG. Generalized estimating equation analyses revealed a significant group-by-time interaction effect on quadriceps strength, overall KOOS score, and Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form score. Findings suggest that a nurse-led hybrid teaching program enhances physical and psychological function after TKR when compared to routine care. This hybrid teaching program, involving exercise and postoperative education, proves to be a feasible and cost-effective intervention for improving outcomes in older adults following TKR. Health care teams should consider it as a viable home rehabilitation option for older adults who undergo TKR. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 17(1), 31-40.].

Medial meniscal repair in stable knees: Survival rate and risk factors for failure at a minimum of 5 years

IntroductionThe menisci play a major role in the protection of the knee against osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus (MM) tear occurring in a stable knee is more at risk of repair failure than a suture concomitant with reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. HypothesisThe survival of MM sutures in stable knees depends on the type of lesion. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study was carried out as part of the 2022 Francophone Arthroscopy Society's symposium, across 10 centers (Bordeaux-Mérignac, Caen, Lille, Lille Louvière, Lyon, Marseille, Toulouse, Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg and Versailles) including medial meniscus sutures in stable knees performed before the end of 2017 (minimum 5 years of follow-up) with a collection of demographic, imaging, suture and postoperative protocol data, and a functional evaluation using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS). The aim of this study was to analyze the medial meniscus sutures in stable knees and to evaluate their survival and their risk factors for failure according to the type of lesion; failure being defined by the use of a meniscectomy. ResultsThree-hundred and sixty-seven MM sutures, including 122 bucket-handle tears, were included. The KOOS score was improved by the meniscal suture by an average of 22.2 points for each sub-score (p<0.05), with an improvement, which was more marked for the bucket-handle tears. The failure rate, defined by revision surgery by meniscectomy, was 33% on average (42% for bucket-handles tears, 26% for others). The probability of survival was reduced for bucket-handle tears (62% at 5 years versus 77% for the other types). For all lesions, the main risk factor identified for failure was immediate weight-bearing [OR=3.6 (1.62; 7.98), p=0.0016]. Smoking was a failure risk factor for bucket-handle tears [OR=5.76 (1.81; 18.35), p=0.003]. ConclusionMM sutures in stable knees improve knee function but present a different risk of failure depending on the type of lesion treated with a higher risk of failure for bucket-handle tears with the need for caution to be applied with regards to weight-bearing and smoking. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective series.

Inflammatory biomarkers in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis: exploring the potential link to chronic postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty-a secondary analysis.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the end-stage treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), and approximately 20% of patients experience chronic postoperative pain. Studies indicate that inflammatory biomarkers might be associated with pain in OA and potentially linked to the development of chronic postoperative pain after TKA. This study aimed to (1) evaluate preoperative serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with OA and healthy control subjects, (2) investigate preoperative differences of inflammatory biomarker profiles in subgroups of patients, and (3) compare subgroups of patients with and without postoperative pain 12 months after surgery. Serum samples from patients with OA scheduled for TKA (n = 127) and healthy participants (n = 39) were analyzed. Patients completed the Knee-injury-and-Osteoarthritis-Outcome-Score (KOOS) questionnaire and rated their clinical pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS) before and 12 months after TKA. Hierarchical cluster analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis were used to compare groups (patients vs control subjects) and to identify subgroups of patients in relation to postoperative outcomes. Difference in preoperative and postoperative VAS and KOOS scores were compared across subgroups. Twelve inflammatory markers were differentially expressed in patients when compared with control subjects. Cluster analysis identified 2 subgroups of patients with 23 proteins being significantly different ( P < 0.01). The 12-months postoperative VAS and KOOS scores were significantly different between subgroups of patients ( P < 0.05). This study identified differences in specific inflammatory biomarker profiles when comparing patients with OA and control subjects. Cluster analysis identified 2 subgroups of patients with OA, with one subgroup demonstrating comparatively worse 12-month postoperative pain intensity and function scores.

Treatment with CR500® improves algofunctional scores in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a post-market confirmatory interventional, single arm clinical investigation

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive and degenerative condition. Several pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are able to improve the OA symptoms and the structural characteristics of the affected joints. Among these, infiltrative therapy with hyaluronic acid (HA) is the most used and consolidated procedure for the pain management. The addition of skin conditioning peptides to HA promotes the cartilage remodeling processes and a better permeation of the HA-based gel containing a peptide mixture, CR500®. Furthermore, the topic route of administration is convenient over the routinely used intra-articular injective procedures. In this study, the effectiveness of CR500® was evaluated in terms of improvement of the algo-functional symptoms related to unilateral knee OA.Methods38 mild and moderate OA patients were enrolled at a screening visit (V-1), treated at baseline visit (V1), and then continued the topical application of CR500® twice a week for 4 weeks, and followed-up for 3 visits (V2-V4) from week 2 to 4. Lequesne Knee Index (LKI) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were collected. Synovial fluid was collected and used for the quantification of neoepitope of type II collagen (C2C), C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II), type II collagen propeptide (CPII), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and HA. The expression of CD11c and CD206 was evaluated on cell pellets.ResultsThree patients were excluded, thus 35 patients were included in the analysis. The treatment with CR500® was safe and well tolerated, with 7.9% patients had mild adverse events, not related to the device. The LKI total score showed a significant decrease from V1 to V4. KOOS score also showed a significant improvement of patient condition at V2, V3 and V4 in comparison with V1 for all subscales, except for KOOS sport subscale which improved only from V3. At V1 a negative correlation among KOOS pain subscale values and C2C, CPII and TNFα levels was observed, as well as a positive correlation between KOOS pain subscale and CD11c/CD206 ratio.ConclusionCR500® is safe and appear to be effective in improving pain and function in OA patients during the 4 weeks of treatment.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05661162. This trial was registered on 22/12/2022.

Early Surgical Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation for Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common and debilitating knee injury that can significantly impair knee function and stability. The optimal management of ACL injuries remains a topic of ongoing debate, with two primary treatment approaches being surgical reconstruction and adequate rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to compare the knee function and stability outcomes between these two treatment modalities, shedding light on their respective effectiveness. We utilized Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 20, 2022. We utilized the Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality assessment. The following outcomes were assessed: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee score, Lysholm score, the occurrence of the knee giving way, Tegner score, KT1000, Lachman test, pivot shift test, SF-36 score to assess the quality of life, and incidence of reinjury and reoperation. We included a total of six trials with a population sample size of 691 patients, which were divided into surgical versus non-surgical groups, accounting for 348 and 343 patients, respectively. The pooled estimate demonstrated that the surgical reconstruction was associated with a significant increase in the IKDC score (MD = 7.49 [2.04, 12.94], (P = 0.007)), and KOOS score was significant in the reconstruction cohort (MD = 5.87 [1.64, 10.09], (P = 0.007)). The incidences of reoperation (RR = 0.43 [0.20, 0.91], (P = 0.03)), reinjury (RR = 0.49 [0.27, 0.88], (P = 0.02)), and occurrence of the knee giving way (RR = 0.19 [0.08, 0.49], (P = 0.005)) were significantly decreased in the surgical cohort. There is no significant difference between both cohorts regarding the Lysholm score (1.27 [-1.39, 3.93], (P = 0.35)). The findings of this comprehensive analysis indicate that early reconstruction does not demonstrate clear superiority over rehabilitation alone in terms of knee function, Lysholm score, and Tegner score among patients with ACL rupture. However, early reconstruction does exhibit a substantial reduction in the incidence of reinjury, reoperation, and knee giving way, suggesting potential benefits in terms of stability outcomes. These results underscore the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and preferences in treatment decision-making.

ARE OBESITY AND AGE CONTRAINDICATIONS TO HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY IN MEDIAL COMPARTMENT OSTEOARTHRITIS?

AbstractHigh tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a well-recognised procedure to address medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). There remains dispute on the impact of pre-operative patient factors on patient related outcome measures (PROMS).Does BMI and age affect &gt; 2 year and &gt; 5 year oxford knee scores (OKS) and Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores (KOOS).A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Timeframe was 26/6/2014 and 25/8/2022. BMI and age were recorded. OKS and KOOS were collected at &gt; 2 years and &gt; 5 years.There were 81 procedures included, of these 50 had OKS and KOOS scores at &gt; 2 years and 35 at &gt; 5 years. Median BMI was 28.5kg/m2, range was 18.6–40.8kg/m2. Spearman's rank for &gt;2 year OKS was p(df)=−0.210 p=0.157, &gt; 5 year OKS p(df)=−0.215 p=0.230. For &gt; 2 year and &gt; 5 year KOOS subscales there were no statistically significant associations on Spearman's rank.For age, median age was 52.5, range 26–71 years old. OKS at &gt;2 year p(df)=0.068 p=0.664, OKS &gt;5 years p(df)=0.065 p= 0.709. For &gt;2 year and &gt; 5 year KOOS subscales there were no statistically significant associations on Spearman's rank.There were no adverse outcome in patients up-to the age of 71. There were no statistically significant Spearman's rank correlations between PROMS and OKS/KOOS scores. This supports recent KOG consensus statement highlighting physiological age importance vs chronological age. Of note there were more negative associations in the BMI group compared with age.

Paper 32: Meniscus Repair Outcomes and Reoperation Rate in Patients Over the Age of 40

Objectives: Meniscus injuries remain a common source of morbidity in patients over the age of 40. Historically, meniscus injuries in this age group have been treated non-operatively or with surgical management limited to debridement procedures. There is strong evidence for repair over meniscectomy in younger patients, however literature remains sparce regarding repair outcomes and re-operation rates for patients over the age of 40. The objectives of this study were to document patient reported outcomes, complications, and re-operation rates for meniscus repairs in patients above the age of 40 and determine what patient demographics or injury characteristics correlated with reoperation. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single academic institution after obtaining IRB approval. An initial query of patients over the age of 40, was performed via the CPT code 29882. Inclusion criteria consisted of patient age greater than 40 at time of initial meniscal repair. Exclusion criteria consisted of prior surgery in the ipsilateral knee, meniscal root repair, septic arthritis postoperatively, and any form of knee trauma postoperatively. Patients that met inclusion criteria were chart reviewed for relevant data including demographic information, comorbidities, surgical procedure information such as type of implant used, laterality of meniscus tear, type of tear and pattern, and revision/re-operation data. Patients were then contacted to answer full 100-point KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) questionnaires. Results: 413 total patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at time of surgery was 46 years (IQR, 43-51), and 214 patients were female (51.8%). KOOS scores were reported at a median follow-up of 24-months (IQR, 3-62). Median symptom, pain, activity of daily living (ADL), sport, and quality of life (QoL) subscales were reported as 78.6 (IQR, 60.7-92.9), 87.5 (IQR, 69.4-97.2), 94.1 (IQR, 82-100), 80.0 (IQR, 55-95), and 68.8 (IQR, 40.6-81.3), respectively. A total of 74 patients underwent reoperation (17.8%). There was no significant difference in reoperation rates when stratified by age group (40-49, 50-59, 60-69) (p=0.515). Reoperation rates were not affected by type of implant used for initial meniscus repair (Fast-fix anchor, Omnispan meniscal anchor, Meniscal cinch implant, Fiberwire, MaxBraid suture, Ethibond suture, PDS suture or Bionics meniscal arrow) (p&gt;0.7). Average number of all-inside anchors used for repair was 2 (IQR, 2-3) and did not correlate with reoperation (p=0.49). Location of initial meniscus tear (body or posterior horn) and tear pattern did not correlate with reoperation rates (p&gt;0.36, p&gt;0.28 respectively). A total of 47 patients complained of postoperative stiffness, of which 28 (6.7%) underwent lysis of adhesions and/or arthroscopic debridement (p=.042). Twenty-five patients sustained a meniscal re-tear or injury, of which 17 underwent reoperation with partial or total meniscectomy. Of the total patient cohort, only seven patients ultimately went on to require ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty (1.6%). Conclusions: Patients over the age of 40 who underwent meniscus repair showed favorable reported outcomes at a mean 2-year follow-up. Reoperation rates were associated with postoperative stiffness and repeat injury. Re-operation rates in patients over 40 are comparable to reported rates of younger patients who undergo meniscus repair.

Spanish Version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life Questionnaire: Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Validation.

The Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the effect of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on the lives of patients. It was originally written in English, which may affect its use when completed by nonnative English speakers. To translate and adapt the ACL-QOL to Spanish and provide evidence of its psychometric properties. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. A total of 183 patients with an ACL injury from 4 Catalan hospitals were included: 99 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction (ACLR) completed the Spanish version of the ACL-QOL (ACL-QOL-Sp) twice (mean interval, 15.2 days) in 2 weeks for test-retest reliability, and 84 patients completed the ACL-QOL-Sp, the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Scale, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) before and at 4 and 9 months after ACLR to assess responsiveness. The association between the ACL-QOL-Sp and the other outcome measures was evaluated with the Spearman correlation coefficient. The ACL-QOL-Sp showed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97). The standard error of measurement was 3.6, also suggesting the precision of measurements. The smallest detectable change was 9.98 in 94% of patients. No association was found between the ACL-QOL-Sp score and the Tegner score or SF-12 mental component summary score; however, a moderate correlation was found with the overall KOOS score (r = -0.545), Lysholm score (r = 0.509), and SF-12 physical component summary score (r = 0.607). The correlation ranged from weak for the KOOS-Symptoms subscore (r = -0.290) to moderate for the KOOS-Quality of Life subscore (r = -0.698). No ceiling or floor effects were observed. The ACL-QOL-Sp showed a moderate effect size (0.73) at 4 months but a large effect size (1.70) at 9 months. The ACL-QOL-Sp showed adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness in evaluating quality of life after ACLR in Spanish-speaking patients.

Impact of end-stage knee osteoarthritis on perceived physical function and quality of life: A descriptive study from Jordan.

Of the present study was to evaluate the impact of end-stage knee OA on patient's perception of their functional abilities and quality of life (QoL) using the self-reported questionnaire; the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and to determine the contribution of knee pain on patient's perceived outcomes. Patients with end-stage knee OA who are on the waiting list for total knee arthroplasty were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Patients were asked to fill out the KOOS questionnaire. Knee pain for both sides was quantified on a continuous scale from 0-10. Age, and anthropometric data were recorded. Descriptive statistics were calculated for patients' characteristics, and for the scores of each KOOS subscale. Hierarchical linear regression models were created to determine the contributions of knee pain on two KOOS subscales; the function in daily living (KOOS-ADL), and the knee-related quality of life (KOOS-QoL). Patients in this study scored low across KOOS subscales (27.7% - 54.2%) with the QoL subscale being the lowest. After accounting for age and BMI, hierarchical linear regressions revealed that knee pain in both sides were determinants of self-perceived KOOS-ADLs, while only knee pain in the most-affected side significantly contributed to lower KOOS-QOL scores. End-stage knee OA negatively impact the patients' perceived function and quality of life. Patients' KOOS scores were similar to those reported in other countries, with QoL being the domain most affected. Our findings demonstrate that the level of knee pain has a determinant effect on our patients' perceptions of functional abilities and QoL. As waiting-list patients, addressing knee pain with a targeted regimen prior to TKA, as well as increasing patient's awareness about knee pain management, may improve/ or minimize deterioration in perceived functional ability and QoL while awaiting TKA.

Partial meniscectomy using needle arthroscopy associated with significantly less pain and improved patient reported outcomes at two weeks after surgery: A comparison to standard knee arthroscopy

Purposeto compare immediate post-operative pain and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after partial meniscectomy with needle (NA) vs. standard (SA) arthroscopy technique. MethodsA retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who underwent partial meniscectomy before and after adoption of a needle arthroscopic technique was performed. Meniscus repairs, root repairs, and those with ligamentous injuries were excluded. Total milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) consumed, Visual analog scale (VAS) pain, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were compared pre-operatively and at 2 and 6-weeks postoperatively. Univariate analysis was used to compare results. ResultsNineteen patients were in each group (NA: 10 females, SA: 11 females). Mean ± SD age (NA 42.8 ± 8.4 vs. SA 47.6 ± 10.4 years, p = 0.13) and body mass index (NA 31.4 ± 5.6 vs. SA 35.1 ± 5.4 m/kg2, p = 0.06) were not significantly different. Seventeen (89%) patients in both groups had medial meniscus tears of the posterior horn. Preoperative Outerbridge score was significantly greater in the SA group (3.4 vs. 1.8, p = 0.002); however, preoperative VAS pain (NA 6.1 ± 1.7 vs. SA 6.1 ± 1.8, p = 0.98) and KOOS pain (NA 44 ± 17% vs. SA 37 ± 12.5%, p = 0.20) were similar. Amount of arthroscopic fluid used was significantly greater in the SA vs. NA group (1.4 ± 0.7 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 L, p < 0.0001), but tourniquet time was equivalent (NA 20 ± 6 vs.16 ± 6 min, p = 0.11). VAS pain scores (NA 1.0 ± 1.1 vs. SA 2.6 ± 1.5, p = 0.0014), KOOS pain (NA 79 ± 15% vs. 58 ± 19%, p = 0.0006), and Quality of Life (QOL) scores (NA 70 ± 22% vs. SA 43 ± 24%, p = 0.001) were significantly better at 2-weeks post-op in the N group. By 6 weeks post-op, all PROs including VAS pain and KOOS scores were similar between groups. ConclusionsAdoption of a needle arthroscopic technique for partial meniscectomy was associated with significantly improved VAS and KOOS pain scores two-weeks post-operatively. Differences were not sustained at 6 weeks after surgery. Level of evidenceIII, Retrospective Comparison Study.

Functional ability in knee osteoarthritis: role of neuropathic pain and central sensitization

BackgroundPain in osteoarthritis (OA) has been attributed traditionally to local tissue injury causing ‘nociceptive pain’. However, recent studies suggest that neuropathic and central sensitization mechanisms may contribute to the pain experience. However, the relationship between these pain mechanisms and physical function has not been thoroughly addressed. This study aimed to assess the association of central sensitization and neuropathic pain with physical function in knee OA.ResultsParticipants with a positive central sensitization inventory score (CSI) (≥ 40) had a decreased total Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and its subscales (p < 0.001), a longer timed up and go test time (p = 0.002) and a higher PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) and visual analogue scale (p < 0.001, p = 0.026 respectively). The severity of Kellgren-Lawrence grading (KL) (p < 0.001), depressive and anxiety symptoms (p < 0.001) increased with neuropathic pain severity. In addition, participants with a high PD-Q score (≥ 19) had a longer timed up and go test time (p < 0.001) and a decreased total KOOS score (p < 0.001). Moreover, we found that CSI score, KOOS score, and KL grading were significantly predicted the PD-Q score (p = 0.046, p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively). Regarding the physical function predictors, multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that pressure pain threshold at right elbow and right knee (p = 0.005, p < 0.001) in addition to PD-Q (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with KOOS score, while CSI and Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale were not.ConclusionKnee OA patients with significant central sensitization and neuropathic pain reported increased pain, more functional impairment, more anxiety and depressive symptoms than OA patients without central sensitization and neuropathic pain. Additionally, neuropathic pain and presence of central sensitization were significant predictors for functional ability.

The Evaluation of Cartilage Regeneration Efficacy of Three-Dimensionally Biofabricated Human-Derived Biomaterials on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Arm, Open Label Study in Egypt.

Full thickness cartilage defects in cases of knee osteoarthritis are challenging in nature and are difficult to treat. The implantation of three-dimensional (3D) biofabricated grafts into the defect site can be a promising biological one-stage solution for such lesions that can avoid different disadvantages of the alternative surgical treatment options. In this study, the short-term clinical outcome of a novel surgical technique that uses a 3D bioprinted micronized adipose tissue (MAT) graft for knee cartilage defects is assessed and the degree of incorporation of such graft types is evaluated via arthroscopic and radiological analyses. Ten patients received 3D bioprinted grafts consisting of MAT with an allogenic hyaline cartilage matrix on a mold of polycaprolactone, with or without adjunct high tibial osteotomy, and they were monitored until 12 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were examined with patient-reported scoring instruments that consisted of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The graft incorporation was assessed using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. At 12 months follow-up, cartilage tissue biopsy samples were taken from patients and underwent histopathological examination. In the results, at final follow-up, the WOMAC and KOOS scores were 22.39 ± 7.7 and 79.16 ± 5.49, respectively. All scores were significantly increased at final follow-up (p < 0.0001). MOCART scores were also improved to a mean of 82.85 ± 11.49, 12 months after operation, and we observed a complete incorporation of the grafts with the surrounding cartilage. Together, this study suggests a novel regeneration technique for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis patients, with less rejection response and better efficacy.

Evaluation of clinical efficacy of Ginkgo biloba extract in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease characterized by deteriorating articular cartilage. Most patients may not get enough control of symptoms in spite of the availability of various treatment options. Because of the synergistic impact of flavonoids and ginkgolides, Ginkgo biloba (GB) has been shown to possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties besides its generally safe profile. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of the Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) in patient with Knee OA . Methods: This is a randomized double blinded clinical trial conducted in a private orthopaedic clinic in Al-Najaf Government-Iraq between 1st November 2021 to 1st June 2022. Patients were randomized into two groups; Group A administered the standard treatment (diclofenac capsule 100 milligram sustained released with paracetamol 1 gram twice daily) with GBE capsule 120 milligram twice daily, while Group B administered the standard treatment with placebo (starch) capsule only. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was performed to assess the efficacy of the GBE in patient with Knee OA for eight weeks.Results: 60 patients (Group A: mean age 54.2±8.6, male 24.24%, female 75.76%; Group B: mean age 58.0±8.4, male 22.22%, female 77.78%) successfully completed the eight weeks follow up. Pain, symptoms, sport, activity of daily living (ADL) scores showed significant improvement in Group A from the first two weeks after treatment with GB in comparison with group B. however, scores of quality of life (QOL) were not significantly improved in two group comparison at each assessment week. Only 10 patients (group A:8, group B:2) reported gastrointestinal adverse effects during the study which were all mild. Conclusions: GB may provide additional beneficial health effects to patients with knee OA based on KOOS scores when add to the standard treatment regime. Registration: ClincialTrials.gov (NCT05398874, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05398874).