Kleinian School Research Articles

Psychoanalytic reflections on the conditions of possibility of human destructiveness

ABSTRACT This paper explores the psychoanalytic contribution to the understanding of war. It takes as its frame of reference the conditions of possibility in the human subject that form the basis for the detonation of such extremes of destruction. Starting with key papers of Freud that address this malaise of our “civilization” it goes on to consider the contributions from the Kleinian school (particularly Money-Kyrle and Segal). The argument is situated within a frame of reference which views the psychoanalytic contribution as part of what the author terms an interdisciplinary conversation. The paper concludes with some more general considerations regarding the horrors of our contemporary world.

The Latin American contribution to the psychoanalytic concept of phantasy

The author argues that the ubiquity of phantasies at various levels of mental functioning is undisputed in the current schools of psychoanalytic thought; however, she demonstrates some variations in their understanding of how the psychotherapeutic access to different configurations occurs. In the process of examining and acknowledging the central role played by unconscious phantasies in his patients’ symptoms, Freud gradually broadened the vernacular meaning of the German word ‘Phantasie’ that refers to imagination and the world of imagination, conferring on it the specific features that came to characterize its use in the psychoanalytic vocabulary. Later, the expansion of the concept derived from Melanie Klein’s clinical material obtained from child analyses gave rise to important debates. The author discusses the main points of disagreement that led to these debates, as well as their various theoretical and technical implications. Psychoanalytic associations in Latin America were strongly influenced by Klein and her followers. Thus, most of their scientific writings use the concept of unconscious phantasy put forward by the Kleinian school. Taking Kleinian principles as their starting point, Baranger and Baranger made the most original Latin American contribution to the concept of unconscious phantasy with their works on the unconscious phantasies generated by the analytic pair.

Using Countertransference: Analytic Contact, Projective Identification, and Transference Phantasy States

The influence of projective identification is an integral aspect of most psychoanalytic treatments, not only with patients who are more disturbed, but also with individuals are higher functioning and have neuroses. Projective identification involves both internal relational phantasies of self and object as well as external interactions with the environment. Both elements shape the transference. Continuous projections distort the ego's image of the object, causing introjections that bring increased guilt, anxiety, and envy onto the ego, creating even more radical projections. Consequently, the countertransference is repeatedly stimulated in an evolving or devolving manner (Clarkin, Yeomans, Kernberg, 2006). The case material has illustrated the constant interplay among projective identification, transference, and countertransference as well as the utility of countertransference in making the most helpful interpretations. The concept of analytic contact (Waska, 2006; Waska 2007) was noted as the vehicle of optimal psychological transformation. Rather than an emphasis on frequency, diagnosis, use of couch, or mode of termination, the focus is more on the clinical situation and the moment-to-moment work on internal conflict, unconscious phantasy, destructive defenses, analysis of the transference and extratransference anxieties, and the gradual integration of core object relational experiences. Regarding a more clinical rather than theoretical definition of psychoanalysis, Sandler (1988) states that what truly defines a treatment as psychoanalytic is the analyst's attitudes towards his patient, his willingness to contain and make the effort to patiently understand the patient's unconscious conflicts and reactions to internal phantasy states, the humane detachment and lack of judgment, and the maintenance of a comfortable and safe setting in which the transference can unfold. This definition is certainly similar to the elements of analytic contact. Use of the countertransference is crucial in finding a path into the patient's projective identification processes, which in themselves often hold the core phantasy states with which the patient most struggles. These phantasies shape his experience of the analyst and the world around him. Melanie Klein thought that phantasy was an essential aspect of the mind from birth onwards, with love, hate, and the quest for knowledge being innate, yet influenced by external events that then recast the phantasy and the patient's reaction and perception of those external situations (Spillus, 2007). Klein's belief that phantasy is the bedrock of human experience has led the Kleinian school to conceptualize the transference as being constant and all pervasive, and therefore, not something that arises at only selected times in the treatment. There is no differentiation between the transference and the working alliance. If the analyst is consistently on the alert for manifestations of the transference, he or she may be able to help the patient identify and work through phantasy conflicts. However, the transference, through a constant phenomenon, may elude the analyst for many reasons. Projective identification dynamics are often the culprit because transference phantasies are hidden, discharged, communicated, acted out, camouflaged, or traded off in projective identification interactions with the analyst. It is here that the countertransference, a likewise constant element in the treatment setting, can be most useful in relocating the transference phantasies. The analyst can begin to explore them, rather than be a part of the patient's denial, destructive acting out, or gratifications. As the countertransference is better understood, the analyst can begin to more properly contain, translate, and ultimately interpret the core phantasy states to help the patient feel more in control of them. It is this ongoing emphasis in working within the transference/projective identification/countertransference matrix that gradually brings clarity to the analyst who can share that knowledge as an interpretive proposal. Then, the patient may use it to build greater psychological freedom, emotional stability, and personal choice.

Between the basic fault and second skin

The ideas that are commonly associated with Esther Bick, such as primal skin function, defensive second skin phenomena and adhesive identity, are traditionally seen as affiliated to the larger body of work that constitutes the Kleinian school. I shall argue, however, that Bick's thinking owes a largely communally unrecognised debt to the work of her training analyst, Michael Balint. Beginning with a discussion of Bick's early psychoanalytic formation within the British Psychoanalytic Society, her ideas will be reapproached in the light of her contemporary psychoanalytic milieu, with particular reference to Balint's notions concerning primary object‐love, the basic fault and space. A brief history of the Manchester Training Centre, a short‐lived but pioneering British attempt to extend psychoanalytic training beyond London, is included incidentally. Bick's early intellectual openness to diverse psychoanalytic streams will then be discussed in relation to the formation of psychoanalytic groups and their relative capacity to tolerate difference.

Between the basic fault and second skin.

The ideas that are commonly associated with Esther Bick, such as primal skin function, defensive second skin phenomena and adhesive identity, are traditionally seen as affiliated to the larger body of work that constitutes the Kleinian school. I shall argue, however, that Bick's thinking owes a largely communally unrecognised debt to the work of her training analyst, Michael Balint. Beginning with a discussion of Bick's early psychoanalytic formation within the British Psychoanalytic Society, her ideas will be reapproached in the light of her contemporary psychoanalytic milieu, with particular reference to Balint's notions concerning primary object-love, the basic fault and space. A brief history of the Manchester Training Centre, a short-lived but pioneering British attempt to extend psychoanalytic training beyond London, is included incidentally. Bick's early intellectual openness to diverse psychoanalytic streams will then be discussed in relation to the formation of psychoanalytic groups and their relative capacity to tolerate difference.

'The dungeon of thyself': the claustrum as pathological container.

The author discusses the claustrum as an aspect of pathological containment within inner space and its relation to Bion's (1962a, b) container-contained concept. Having outlined the early psychoanalytic conceptual foundations of claustrophobia and the claustrum, the author charts the term from its introduction by Erikson in 1937 through its divergent developmental trajectories within the conceptual vocabulary of the classical, Independent and Kleinian schools up to Meltzer's (1992) contemporary reworking. The vicissitudes of the transmission of ideas within and between these groups is stressed, Esther Bick's work being particularly highlighted as an example of a nodal intellectual influence. The claustral space within the physical or internal object body, its internal structuralization, and the impairments in quality of psychic life of the selves that seek to inhabit such spaces, entered through intrusive projective identification, are highlighted. Developmental and psychopathological claustrum manifestations are discussed, particularly fear, separation, problems mourning and claustrophobia. A reciprocal and hierarchical avatar relation between the claustrum and the container is proposed.

“The Dungeon of Thyself”: The claustrum as pathological container

The author discusses the claustrum as an aspect of pathological containment within inner space and its relation to Bion's (1962a, b) container—contained concept. Having outlined the early psychoanalytic conceptual foundations of claustrophobia and the claustrum, the author charts the term from its introduction by Erikson in 1937 through its divergent developmental trajectories within the conceptual vocabulary of the classical, Independent and Kleinian schools up to Meltzer's (1992) contemporary reworking. The vicissitudes of the transmission of ideas within and between these groups is stressed, Esther Bick's work being particularly highlighted as an example of a nodal intellectual influence. The claustral space within the physical or internal object body, its internal structuralisation, and the impairments in quality of psychic life of the selves that seek to inhabit such spaces, entered through intrusive projective identification, are highlighted. Developmental and psychopathological claustrum manifestations are discussed, particularly fear, separation, problems mourning and claustrophobia. A reciprocal and hierarchical avatar relation between the claustrum and the container is proposed.

After Eden: Envy and the defences against anxiety paradigm

Envy has the potential for substantial destructiveness in social systems. Despite its fundamental place in the Kleinian psychoanalytic study of individuals, for several decades, envy has been virtually excluded from psychoanalytic studies of social systems. This paper focuses on this omission, arguing that the Kleinian school established a paradigm focusing on 'social systems as a defence against anxiety'. The implicit delimiting of this paradigm has allowed no room for envy: envy is quite distinct from anxiety; and it is not defensive, involving unwarranted attacks instead. In recent years, envy has emerged as the existing paradigm's anomaly. It is argued here that a new paradigm which has conceptual space for the notion of 'social systems as an envious attack' is required. Group, organizational and societal examples are offered to exemplify the dangerous and malignant potential of envy in such social systems.

The Psychology of Dependence Between Landlord and Sharecropper in Northeastern Brazil

Contrasting beliefs and attitudes held by sharecroppers and their landlord on a fazenda in Northeastern Brazil reveal a tendency to split one another into positively and negatively idealized images. Sharecroppers who ambivalently seek patronage construct good vs. bad landlords/patrons. The landlord, defensive about envy and hostility among sharecroppers, constructs good vs. bad tenants/workers. Theory from the Kleinian school of psychoanalysis concerning envy, splitting, and idealization provides a framework for interpreting ethnographic case materials.

Healing, Exorcism and Object Relations Theory

SUMMARY.From the earliest years of the psychoanalytic movement analysts have inclined to be either healers or exorcists. Jung, Ferençzi, Rank and Reich seem to speak with the characteristic voice of the healer. There is an implicit trust in the healing power of relationship, an emphasis on the patient's creative potential, a readiness to engage. Whereas those analysts, like Karl Abraham, who followed Freud's advocacy of analytic detachment, maintain a greater distance between themselves and their patient while focussing on the negative aspects of the infantile psyche. This tradition set the style of the classical analytic approach rigorously maintained by Melanie Klein and her followers. The Kleinian school actively challenges resistance, manipulation, seduction and all the carefully hidden expressions of negative transference. In their determination to‘name the devils’and their readiness to confront them, they, like Davanloo, take the characteristic stance of the exorcist.While healing and exorcism are very different modes of functioning, it would be a false simplification to see them as mutually exclusive. The shaman, in reclaiming the lost soul, must at the same time do battle with the devils that hold it captive. The exorcist, even as he drives out the demons, prays earnestly for the soul of the sinner. An object relations analyst must be capable of controntation when the occasion warrants; equally the classical analyst heals through sensitive understanding and the maintenance of safe analytic boundaries. Healing alone will fail where no attempt is made to purge the patient of his bad inner objects. But, more fundamentally, the whole therapeutic enterprise is meaningful only to the degree that a truly human connection has been established. The difficulty is to move freely between the two modes and to see them as complementary aspects of a single process.