Designing chemical reactor equipment requires a thorough understanding of powder flow. Solid rheology modelling offers various models for this purpose. A comparative study of two different CFD models, the Kinetic Theory of Granular Flow (KTGF) and the dense granular flow (μI law), is proposed. Both models were confronted with experimental results obtained on a rotating drum for different rotation speeds and powder flowabilities. Image processing was used to compare the experimental gas/solid interfaces with those obtained from CFD. The KTGF model did not represent the powder rheology at low rotation speeds, regardless of the powder, whereas it was closer to experiments at higher speeds. The dense granular flow model was more appropriate for this system as it described the powder shape inside a rotating drum relatively well for each experiment. The latter model is recommended for modelling dense granular flows, while the KTGF is better suited to gas-solid flows.