Results from a retrospective, quantitative, cross-sectional study to assess the agreement and accuracy of the clinical dermatoscopic diagnosis of melanoma and nonmelanoma SC in comparison with dermatopathologic examinations. In total, 3205 patients were evaluated, with a 67-year mean age. Of these patients, 1603 (50.1%) had a clinical-dermatoscopic hypothesis of AC, with 859 (53.4%) being female and 744 (46.6%) being male patients. Of the suspected cases, 1300 had a clinical-dermatoscopic diagnosis of BCC; 230, SCC; 34, MM; and 39, keratoacanthoma (KA), with a dermatopathologic confirmation of 90.85%; 67.39%; 93.5%; and 85.64%, respectively. The clinical dermatoscopic versus dermatopathologic agrement for all the SC was statistically significant, according to Kappa coefficient and chi-square test. For KA, our accuracy was 85.64%, and these data are the first publication that correlate the clinical dermatoscopic suspect of KA with dermatopathologic confirmation. Our findings show our BCC clinical accuracy (90.85%) is in accordance with the literature. However, for SCC and MM, we had an accuracy greater than what had been published until then, respectively, 67.39 and 93.5%. In conclusion, an exact diagnosis of SCC depends on clinical, dermatoscopic, and histopathologic criteria. Likewise, MM, in which clinical diagnosis’ assertiveness is only 76%, SCC’s clinical diagnosis may be considered a fragile issue because KA is often confused with SCC. In these cases, dermatoscopy has the ability to speed up the therapeutic management of SC which needs more immediate management, even more so when the dermatopathologic diagnosis, the gold-standard tool for diagnosing SC, may be delayed or not available.
Read full abstract