HOLLYWOOD, EVERY now and then, churns out a lm about role swaps or age swaps. Some magical happening occurs and swoosh, an adult becomes a child and a child becomes an adult, and much hilarity ensues as they struggle to cope with their new roles. Interestingly, it always seems to be the child who copes best with their new status, and the adult turned child who ends up in a kerfu e. is line of thought follows a classic bit of association. An event triggering a memory, triggering an idea, completing a circle. e trigger, in this case, was a moment from the closing ceremony of the London Olympics. ere was a brief, and given the rest of the show (my opinion only, of course), an all too eeting broadcast of Running up that hill by Kate Bush. A good friend of mine had recently surprised me by saying that he had been listening to a great deal of the songstress recently, which is one of the reasons why it stuck in my memory, post closing ceremony. e other being that it is a really good song (stick with me here). So, with the song still fresh in my memory (no mean feat these days), I decided to listen again, and being one for a decent lyric, I was struck by the line ‘... if I only could, I’d make a deal with god, and get him to swap our places...’ It was while listening that I was reading Michael Rosen’s excellent blog (always thought provoking), which questioned whether the present government’s thinking on maths was up to scratch and t for purpose. is led, in my head at least, to an image of certain ministers and education secretaries being swoooshed/zapped in some lm, as per above, into nurseries and primary schools to live their lives as children again – I know, I should get out more. e point being, is this: Is what the ministers in charge of steering educational policy proclaim as being best for children and right for them, all that important to a child? What would the ministers-turned-children’s experience in a setting or primary school be? Would their viewpoint change? Now, this might seem a bit far-fetched, or even irrelevant (or irreverent), but there is an important consideration here. In determining what we think is right for the future of the country, are we providing the best experiences for children today? Can forward thinking on an economic and political scale, be compatible with ensuring the happiness, care, emotional support, love, challenge, opportunities and varied experiences that help children to grow up contented, well-rounded, creative and expressive? I am not saying that the two are incompatible, merely that at all times we need to ensure that future expectations do not take away from the enchanted and extraordinary world of childhood – if you were a child again, you would want to be a child, not a future something or other. ere needs to be a balance, because a world without balance will always teeter on the edge of chaos. e Olympics has taught us that given the right support and the right environment we can achieve phenomenal things, whether it is winning gold medals or volunteering and helping others, and all things in between. We should all be mindful of legacy. Editor Neil Henty MSc eye@markallengroup.com
Read full abstract