Kaplan-Meier Estimates Of Freedom Research Articles

Predictors of recurrent restenosis after repeat drug-coated balloon therapy for drug-coated balloon restenosis in femoropopliteal lesions: Results of the RECURRENCE study.

Despite the widespread use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, there is still no consensus on treatment strategies for DCB restenosis. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrent restenosis after repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis in FP lesions. This multicenter retrospective study assessed 1176 consecutive limbs in 860 patients who successfully received initial DCB therapy for FP lesions at four cardiovascular centers between May 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 118 consecutive limbs of 104 patients treated via repeat DCB for primary DCB restenosis were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from recurrent restenosis was 74.6% at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis revealed that recurrent restenosis was independently associated with the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.92; p < 0.001), history of ≥2 endovascular therapies (EVTs) (HR, 3.11; 95%CI, 1.36-7.12; p = 0.007), and PACSS grade 3 or 4 (HR, 2.76; 95%CI, 1.15-6.63; p = 0.023). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of the time from initial DCB to primary restenosis to prevent recurrent restenosis was 12.6 months, with an area under the curve of 0.841 (p < 0.001). Repeat DCB therapy for DCB restenosis might be an acceptable strategy, particularly for restenosis that occurred more than 12.6 months after initial DCB, given the rate of freedom from recurrent restenosis.

Stellarex Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease: Five-Year Results from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to report the 5-year outcomes from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal randomized controlled trial of the lower dose (2 µg/mm2) Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Philips, formerly Spectranetics Corp, Colorado Springs, Colorado) compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Long-term safety and effectiveness data for DCBs remains limited. The ILLUMENATE Pivotal was a prospective, randomized, multi-center, single-blinded study. Patients (Rutherford Clinical Category 2 to 4) were randomized 2:1 to Stellarex DCB or PTA. Follow-up was through 60 months. In total, 300 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.8 ± 10.2 years. At 60 months, freedom from a primary safety event was 69.2% in the Stellarex DCB arm and 68.2% in the PTA arm (log-rank, p = 0.623). The cumulative rate of major adverse events was 41.0% compared with 44.6% (p = 0.597), respectively. Freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was 70.3% in the Stellarex DCB arm compared with 68.2% in the PTA arm (p = 0.505). Time to first CD-TLR was 768.3 ± 478.9 days compared with 613.5 ± 453.4 days, respectively (p = 0.161). Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from all-cause mortality were 80.1% in the Stellarex DCB arm and 80.2% in the PTA arm (log-rank, p = 0.980). In conclusion, the 5-year results of the ILLUMENATE Pivotal randomized controlled trial add to the consistent safety data from the broader ILLUMENATE clinical program. These are the first data to report the 5-year safety and efficacy of a lower dose (2 µg/mm2) DCB for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration:NCT01858428.

The Effect of One Year Aneurysm Sac Dynamics on Five Year Mortality and Continued Aneurysm Sac Evolution

One year aneurysm sac dynamics after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were independently associated with a greater all cause mortality risk in prior registry studies but were limited in completeness and granularity. This retrospective analysis aimed to study the impact of sac dynamics on survival within the Endurant Stent Graft Global Registry (ENGAGE) with five year follow up. A total of 1 263 subjects were enrolled in the ENGAGE Registry between March 2009 and April 2011. One year aneurysm sac changes were calculated between the one month post-operative imaging scans and the scan closest to the time of one year follow up. Sac regression was defined as a sac decrease of ≥ 5 mm and sac expansion as aneurysm sac growth ≥ 5 mm. The primary outcome was the five year all cause mortality rate. Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from all cause death were calculated. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine the association between sac dynamics and all cause death. At one year, 441 of the 949 study participants with appropriate imaging (46%) had abdominal aortic aneurysm sac regression, 462 (49%) remained stable, and 46 (4.8%) had sac expansion. For patients with sac regression, the five year all cause mortality rate was 20%, compared with 28% for stable sac (p= .007) and 37% for the sac expansion (p= .010) cohorts. After adjustment, the sac expansion and stable sac cohorts were associated with a greater all cause mortality rate (expansion: hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; 95% CI 1.1 - 3.2; p= .032; stable: HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 - 1.9; p= .019). In the ENGAGE Global Registry, the one year rate of sac regression was 46%, and one year sac regression was observed to be associated with greater five year survival, corroborating prior findings using data from vascular registries. Sac regression could become the new standard for success after EVAR.

Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in South Africa: One-year outcome from the Cryo Global Registry

Background. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon catheter ablation (CBA) is a well-established and widely adopted method for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent recurrences of AF. CBA adoption in South Africa (SA) and outcome data in SA patients are limited.Objectives. To evaluate real-world usage, safety and effectiveness of CBA in SA. Methods. In this sub-analysis of the Cryo Global Registry, 81 participants with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PsAF) were enrolled between 2017 and 2021 across two private SA hospitals. Baseline characteristics, procedural characteristics, 12-month safety, effectiveness (atrial arrhythmia recurrence), healthcare utilisation (repeat ablation and all-cause hospitalisation), quality of life (QoL; measured by EQ-5D-3L) and predefined symptoms were reported on. Results. Participants in the SA cohort were a mean (standard deviation) of 60 (12) years old, 19 (23.5%) were female, and 48 (59.3%) presented with PAF. The overall presence of baseline comorbidities in the SA cohort was relatively low compared with the entire Cryo Global Registry cohort. The acute PVI success rate was high (98.8%). Two serious procedure-related adverse events occurred in 2 (2.5%) participants in the SA cohort. Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence was 97.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.2 - 99.6%) in PAF and 78.4% (95% CI 58.1 - 89.7%) in persistent AF (p=0.035). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from repeat ablations and all-cause hospitalisations were 97.0% (95% CI 88.4 - 99.2%) and 98.5% (95% CI 90.0 - 99.8%), respectively. Participants reported significant improvement in EQ-5D-3L index score and symptoms from baseline (0.90 (0.11)) - 12 months (0.97 (0.07), p&lt;0.001). Conclusion. CBA standard-of-care procedures in SA resulted in a high clinical freedom from arrhythmia recurrence, with a low risk of safety events within 12 months post ablation. In addition, participants experienced an improvement in QoL and high freedom from healthcare utilisation at 12 months. The obtained results will be important for guiding clinical decisions around CBA in SA.

Long-Term Outcomes with Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Real-World Data Analysis.

BACKGROUND Long-term real-world outcomes data for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) converting from immediate-release tacrolimus (IRT) to prolonged-release tacrolimus (PRT) are limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective, non-interventional review of adult KTRs treated with PRT for ≥1 month was conducted in Germany. Data were extracted from time of transplant (2008-2014) to 2018. Primary composite endpoints (graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft dysfunction) and secondary endpoints (all-cause mortality, kidney function course, and tacrolimus dose/trough levels) were analyzed for sub-cohorts: de novo PRT, early conversion from IRT (within 6 months post-transplant), and late conversion (7 months to 3 years). RESULTS Analysis included 163 patients (101 de novo, 12 early converters, and 50 late converters). The overall Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from efficacy failure through 5 years was 0.537, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.455-0.612) (de novo: 0.512 [0.407-0.608]; early converters: 0.500 [0.208-0.736]; late converters: 0.594 [0.443-0.717]). The overall survival rate was 0.925 (95% CI 0.872-0.957) (de novo: 0.900 [0.823-0.945]; early converters: 0.917 [0.539-0.988]; late converters: 0.977 [0.846-0.997]). During follow-up, there was a gradual reduction in tacrolimus dose and trough levels; kidney function remained stable in all cohorts. Multivariable analysis found re-transplantation, organ donor quality, best estimated glomerular filtration rate 8-12 weeks after transplant, and treatment center (between-center differences in age, sex, donor status/quality) were significantly associated with efficacy failure. CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in long-term survival profiles between KTRs who received PRT de novo vs those who converted from IRT, with 5-year survival remaining high in both groups.

A registry-based study of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of the femoral-popliteal artery

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to report the results of a prospective, single-arm, registry-based study assessing the safety and performance of a paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) in a United States population. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, single-arm, post-market registry of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB for the treatment of ISR lesions in the SFA or popliteal artery at 43 sites within the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Registry from December 2016 to January 2020. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 12, 24, and 36 months. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success, target vessel revascularization, major limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. Results are presented as survival probabilities based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. ResultsPatients (N = 300) were 58% male, with a mean age of 68 ± 10 years. Diabetes was present in 56%, 80% presented with claudication, and 20% with rest pain. Lesions included ISR of the SFA in 68%, SFA-popliteal in 26%, and popliteal arteries in 7%. The mean lesion length was 17.8 ± 11.8 cm. Lesions were categorized as occlusions in 43% (mean occluded length, 16 ± 10 cm). TASC type was A (17%), B (29%), C (38%), and D (15%). Technical success was 99%. Re-stenting was performed in 5% and thrombolysis in 0.6% of patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from target lesion revascularization were 90%, 72%, and 62% at 12, 24, and 36 months. Freedom from target vessel revascularization was 88%, 68%, and 59% and freedom from major target limb amputation was 99.6%, 98.9%, and 98.9%, respectively, at 12, 24, and 36 months. Survival was 95%, 89%, and 85% at 12, 24, and 36 months. ConclusionsThis post-market registry-based study shows promising results in treating femoral-popliteal ISR with paclitaxel DCB in comparison to the results of plain balloon angioplasty reported in the literature. These results demonstrate the ability of the SVS VQI to conduct post-market evaluation of peripheral devices in partnership with industry and federal regulators.

Driveline infection according to driveline positioning in left ventricular assist device implant recipients.

We conducted a prospective, open-labeled, clinical trial, with a two-by-two factorial design, of argon cold plasma application and two different types of driveline positioning for the prevention of driveline infection (DLI) in 80 patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. Here, we present the results of intracorporeal loop positioning (n = 40) versus no intracorporeal loop positioning (n = 40). Patients were followed up for 1 year. According to the Driveline Expert STagINg and carE grading (DESTINE) system, a DLI was considered in case of a stage 2 or higher graded infection. During follow-up, 29 (36%) patients experienced a DLI, 16 in the group with intracorporeal loop positioning and 13 in the group with no intracorporeal loop positioning. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from DLI showed no statistically significant difference between study groups during follow-up (p = 0.33). In detail, 30-day freedom from DLI was for the groups with and without intracorporeal loop positioning 92 and 92%, respectively, and 1-year freedom from DLI was 51 and 62%, respectively. In conclusion, this controlled clinical trial was unable to show a statistically significant difference in freedom from DLI during one year of follow-up in groups with or without intracorporeal loop positioning. However, larger trials have to confirm these results.

Chronic safety and performance of the extravascular ICD: results from the global EV ICD Pivotal study

Abstract Background Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias, but conventional systems carry a risk of transvenous (TV) lead-related complications. The novel extravascular ICD (EV ICD) may reduce some of these complications, while offering anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), pause prevention pacing, and a device of similar size and projected battery longevity as a TV ICD, by placing a lead substernally. The EV ICD Pivotal study demonstrated EV ICD safety and performance for termination of ventricular arrythmias at 6 months. Longer-term performance is unknown. Purpose To report the chronic safety and performance of the EV ICD system. Methods The extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV ICD) Pivotal study was a prospective, international, single-arm, premarket clinical study. Patients with a class I or IIa indication for a single-chamber ICD per ESC or ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines were enrolled. Freedom from major system- and/or procedure-related complications at 18 mo was evaluated, as well as conversion of arrhythmias by anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock through all available follow up. Rates of ATP success were evaluated using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) and simple proportions. Results Implantation was attempted in 316 patients: 74.7% male, age 53.8±13.1 years, 82% primary prevention, left ventricular ejection fraction of 38.9%±15.4%, and New York Heart Association Class I (23.4%) or II/III (65.5%). Of 299 implanted patients (average follow up 16.2±7.2 mo), 19 experienced 80 spontaneous, appropriately treated arrhythmic episodes: 37 treated by ATP, 15 by ATP and shock, and 28 by shock alone with a Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated 6.8% of patients experiencing appropriate therapy by 18 mo (Figure). Of discrete episodes treated with shock, 21/21 (100%) were successfully terminated. ATP was delivered in 12 patients, successfully treating 35/52 episodes (67.3%; GEE adjusted 59.0%). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 35 patients through all follow up, with a rate of 10.2% at 1 year. The KM estimate of freedom from major EV ICD system-or procedure-related complications rate through 18 mo was 91.9% (95% CI: 88.2% to 94.4%). The most common event was lead dislodgment (10 events in 9 patients) identified 0 to 120 days post-implant, predominantly due to anchoring technique. Conclusion The safety and effectiveness of a novel EV ICD system with a substernal lead extends through chronic follow up. Shocks were avoided in nearly half of all spontaneous episodes because of the availability of ATP.Figure

Clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with drug-coated balloon treatment for femoropopliteal artery disease in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

Abstract Background Hemodialysis (HD) patients, who are at high risk for atherosclerosis including peripheral artery disease, are associated with poor clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy. Although recent clinical trials have reported favorable outcomes after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for femoropopliteal lesions, its usefulness and risk factors in HD patients have not been well elucidated. Purpose This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes and the associated risk factors after DCB treatment in HD patients with femoropopliteal lesions. Methods This study included 140 HD patients with their 185 femoropopliteal lesions that underwent DCB treatment between September 2018 and January 2022. Non-HD patients and cases of acute limb ischemia were excluded. The endpoints were 1-year freedom from restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The risk factors were also evaluated. Result Duration of maintenance hemodialysis in all patients was 8.6 years. Mean lesion length was 11.0±6.9 cm, and rates of chronic total occlusion and severe calcification were 17.3% and 45.4%, respectively. Types of DCB were IN.PACT Admiral (22.9%), Lutonix (50.8%) and Ranger (24.3%). Bail-out stenting was performed in 1.1% of all lesions. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from restenosis and CD-TLR were 63.8% and 71.3% at 12 months, respectively. The freedom rates from CD-TLR after high-dose and low-dose DCB therapy were 79.4% and 66.4%, respectively (p=0.095). Risk factors independently associated with 1-year CD-TLR were diabetes [hazard ratio (HR) 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-5.15, p=0.043], chronic limb-threatening ischemia (HR 1.93, 95%CI 1.05-3.53, p=0.035) and sever calcification (HR 2.42, 95%CI 1.39-4.21, p=0.0019). When patients were divided into groups according to number of these three risk factors, the rates of freedom from CD-TLR at 12 months were 100%, 94.8%, 76.7% and 30.3% among groups with no risk factor, any 1 risk factor, any 2 risk factors and all risk factors, respectively (p&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusion The 1-year clinical outcomes after DCB treatment in HD patients with femoropopliteal lesions were unsatisfactory. Independent risk factors for 1-year CD-TLR were diabetes, chronic limb-threatening ischemia and severe calcification.

Disparities in Outcomes Between Sexes in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Treated with TEVAR

To evaluate differences in presentation and outcomes between sexes in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2017 186 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for TBAD at a single institution. Men (n=112) and women (n=74) were compared based on presenting demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. Women were older (P=0.04) and had a lower body mass index (P=0.03). More women (F) presented with continued pain or refractory hypertension (51.0% F, 30.0% M), while more men (M) presented with acute complicated dissections (19.0% F, 39.0% M) (P=0.008). At presentation, women had statistically higher relative rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P=0.05), hyperlipidemia (P=0.03), and smoking (P=0.03). Significantly more women were on Medicare without Medicaid (55.0% F, 34.0% M), while men had private insurance (35.0% F, 13.0% M) (P=0.005). There was no significant difference in blood pressure control at presentation, discharge, or at 30days. When normalized by body surface area, women had larger ascending aortic diameters (19.2(3.10)F, 17.5(2.40)M, P=0.0002), as well as proportionally larger true lumens at the left subclavian artery (14.9(2.90)F, 13.4(2.50)M, P=0.0002), carina (12.6(5.80)F, 9.90(4.80)M, P=0.0009), and celiac (10.5(4.50)F, 8.50(4.10)M, P=0.006) levels, and at the largest point of dissection (11.6(6.50)F, 9.60(4.80)M, P=0.04), as well as proportionately smaller false lumens at the carina (5.90(5.60)F, 9.30(6.10)M, P=0.003). Despite not being statistically significant, women had lower rates of stroke (6.80% F, 8.00% M, P=0.7) and acute kidney injury (5.40% F, 11.6% M, P=0.2), as well fewer days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.20(4.30)F, 4.60(6.60)M, P=0.2) and an overall shorter length of stay (6.80(6.70)F, 8.00(8.20)M, P=0.5). Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival for women versus men were 96.0% vs. 92.0%, 90.0% vs. 79.0%, and 70.0% vs. 69.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P=0.042). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from reintervention for women versus men were 89.0% vs. 90.0%, 58.0% vs. 72.0%, and 48.0% vs. 58.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P=0.13). Women present with TBAD at an older age, have more comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and have larger ascending aortic diameters for their size. Despite having less severe dissections as evidenced by smaller false lumens and wider true lumens, it does not appear that this correlates with improved outcomes for women when compared to men. It appears that this is one of the few, if not only, aortic pathologies that result in comparable outcomes between sexes.

Optimized drug-coated balloon angioplasty of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries using the Tack Endovascular System: Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) III 24-month results in standard and long lesions.

The Tack Endovascular System is a minimal-metal dissection repair device that is purpose-built to treat post-percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) arterial dissections in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) III trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Tack Endovascular System in patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery (PPA) dissection after PTA with a drug-coated balloon (DCB). The objective of this study is to report the results in the standard- (SL) and long-lesion (LL) cohorts through 24 months. The TOBA III study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study including patients suffering from Rutherford category 2-4 PAD. Outcomes were assessed according to pre-specified lesion length in SL ( ≥ 20 mm and ≤150 mm) and LL ( > 150 mm and ≤250 mm) cohorts. Follow-up was through 24 months. TOBA III enrolled 201 patients, 169 patients in the SL cohort and 32 in the LL cohort. At 24 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from major adverse events were 91.7% and 82.6% for the SL cohort and LL cohort, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from clinically driven-target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were 92.3% in the SL cohort and 82.6% in the LL cohort. At 24 months, 78.8% of SL patients and 69.2% of LL patients experienced an improvement of >2 Rutherford categories (both cohorts p < 0.001). The baseline ankle-brachial index improved from 0.68 ± 0.18 to 0.93 ± 0.16 in the SL (p < 0.001) and from 0.62 ± 0.23 to 0.87 ± 0.15 in the LL cohort (p < 0.001) at 24 months. The 24-month results of the TOBA III trial support the safety and effectiveness of the Tack Endovascular System in patients who required post-PTA dissection repair in the SFA and PPA following DCB angioplasty for claudication and rest pain. In both the SL and LL cohorts, Tack placement was associated with sustained freedom from CD-TLR through 24 months as well as sustained improvements in Rutherford categories, ankle-brachial index, and quality of life.

2-year outcomes of MitraClip as a bridge to heart transplantation: The international MitraBridge registry

BackgroundIn the first report from the MitraBridge registry, MitraClip as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) proved to be at 1-year an effective treatment strategy for 119 patients with advanced heart failure (HF) who were potential candidates for HTx. We aimed to determine if benefits of MitraClip procedure as a bridge-to-transplant persist up to 2-years. MethodsBy the end of the enrollment period, a total of 153 advanced HF patients (median age 59 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 26.9 ± 7.7%) with significant secondary mitral regurgitation, who were potential candidates for HTx and were treated with MitraClip as a bridge-to-transplant strategy, were included in the MitraBridge registry. The primary endpoint was the 2-year composite adverse events rate of all-cause death, first hospitalization for HF, urgent HTx or LVAD implantation. ResultsProcedural success was achieved in 89.5% of cases. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. At 2-year, Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from primary endpoint was 47%. Through 24 months, the annualized rate of HF rehospitalization per patient-year was 44%. After an overall median follow-up time of 26 (9–52) months, elective HTx was successfully performed in 30 cases (21%), 19 patients (13.5%) maintained or obtained the eligibility for transplant, and 32 patients (22.5%) no longer had an indication for HTx because of significant clinical improvement. ConclusionsAfter 2-years of follow-up, the use of MitraClip as a bridge-to-transplant was confirmed as an effective strategy, allowing elective HTx or eligibility for transplant in one third of patients, and no more need for transplantation in 22.5% of cases.

5-Year Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons for Peripheral Artery In-Stent Restenosis, Long Lesions, and CTOs

BackgroundLong-term data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) outcomes in complex femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions are limited. ObjectivesThe authors sought to report 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes of a paclitaxel DCB for the treatment of de novo in-stent restenosis (ISR), long lesions (LL), or chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in the prespecified imaging cohorts of the IN.PACT Global Study. MethodsThe IN.PACT Global study was a prospective, international single-arm study. Assessments through 5 years included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), a safety composite (freedom from device- and procedure-related death to 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and freedom from clinically driven target vessel revascularization within 60 months), and major adverse events. ResultsThe prespecified imaging cohorts enrolled 132 de novo ISR, 158 LL, and 127 CTO participants. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from CD-TLR through 5 years were 58.0% (ISR), 67.3% (LL), and 69.8% (CTO). The cumulative incidences of the composite safety endpoint were 56.0% (ISR), 65.7% (LL), and 69.8% (CTO). The 5-year freedom from all-cause mortality with vital status update were 81.4% (ISR), 75.2% (LL), and 78.2% (CTO). Within the ISR cohort, 15.9% of participants experienced 2 or more TLRs, compared with 9.5% and 5.5% in the LL and CTO groups, respectively. ConclusionsResults demonstrate long-term safety and effectiveness of this DCB in all 3 cohorts, with low reintervention rates in the LL and CTO cohorts and no safety issues. These results support the inclusion of this DCB into the treatment algorithm for complex femoropopliteal disease.

Long-Term Follow-up of Subjects With Iliac Occlusive Disease Treated With the Viabahn VBX Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthesis

This physician-initiated study provides 5-year (i.e., long-term) treatment durability data from 3 top recruitment sites that participated in the prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm VBX FLEX clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02080871). It evaluates the long-term treatment durability of the GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endoprosthesis (VBX Stent-Graft) in the treatment of subjects with de novo or restenotic aortoiliac lesions. A total of 59 subjects with 94 treated lesions were enrolled at the 3 participating sites from the original 140 intent-to-treat subjects in the VBX FLEX study. The primary durability endpoint was long-term primary patency. Secondary long-term outcomes included freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), freedom from target vessel revascularization (TVR), as well as resting ankle-brachial index (ABI), Rutherford category, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, and Walking Impairment status. Fifty-nine subjects participated and twenty-eight (47.5%) were available through the end of the study at 5-year follow-up (the median follow-up time was 6.6 years due to complications resulting from COVID-19 precautions). At 3 and 5 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from all-cause mortality were 94.5% and 81.7%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for primary patency at 3 and 5 years were 94.0% and 89.5% (by lesion) and 91.7% and 84.4% (by subject). Primary assisted patency at 3 and 5 years were 93.3% and 93.3%. Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from TLR at 5 years was 89.1%. The majority of subjects were asymptomatic (Rutherford category 0) at 3 years (29/59; 72%), and at 5-year follow-up (18/28; 64%). The 5-year mean resting ankle-brachial index was 0.95±0.18, an improvement of 0.15±0.26 from the baseline (p<0.001). Quality of life measures also showed sustained improvement through long-term follow-up. The 5-year long-term follow-up data underscore the robustness and durability of the Viabahn Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthesis for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease. Durable improvement after endovascular treatment of iliac occlusive disease is clinically important because many of these patients are claudicants with significant life expectancy. This study is the first to evaluate the long-term outcomes in patients with iliac occlusive disease treated with the Viabahn VBX balloon-expandable endopirostheses. The study reports excellent long-term patency outcomes with prolonged clinical benefit. These durable results are likely to be an important consideration for clinicians undertaking iliac artery revascularization procedures.

Five-year results of the LEOPARD trial of commercially available endografts

ObjectiveThe LEOPARD (Looking at EVAR Outcomes by Primary Analysis of Randomized Data) trial is a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using commercially available devices in a real-world population. MethodsA prospective, randomized, multi-center trial was performed to compare the anatomically fixated (AF) AFX/AFX2 endograft system (Endologix) with endografts with proximal fixation (PF) (Cook Medical Zenith Flex; Gore Excluder; and Medtronic Endurant II) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. The primary endpoint was freedom from aneurysm-related complications (ARCs), a composite endpoint consisting of perioperative death (≤30 days), aneurysm rupture, conversion to open surgical repair, postoperative endoleaks, endograft migration (≥10 mm), aneurysm enlargement (≥5 mm), endograft limb occlusion, and device- or aneurysm-related reintervention. ResultsThe study population was 455 patients enrolled at 56 United States centers: 235 patients were treated with AF devices and 220 with PF devices. The primary endpoint supported noninferiority of the AF cohort at 1 year. The 5-year freedom from ARC Kaplan-Meier estimates were 63.8% for AF patients and 55.5% for PF patients (P = .10). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from aneurysm-related mortality were 98.7% and 97.0% in the AF group and 99.5% and 98.5% in the PF group at 1 and 5 years. There was no difference in aneurysm-related mortality, all-cause mortality, rupture, secondary interventions, and type I and type III endoleak between the two cohorts. The type III endoleak rate at 5 years for the AFX cohort was 1.5% and 0.0% for the comparator cohort (P = .11). There was a lower type II endoleak rate in the AF group at 5 years (78.8% vs 68.4%; P = .037). There were zero open surgical conversions (0.0%) in the AF group and four (2.0%) in the PF group. ConclusionsThe 5-year results from the LEOPARD study demonstrated that there was no clinically significant difference in overall aneurysm-related outcomes between patients randomized to the AFX endograft system or commercially available endografts with proximal fixation.

Paclitaxel-coated balloons for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease: final five-year results of the IN.PACT Global Study.

Numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the superiority of paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCBs) over non-coated angioplasty balloons for treatment of femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD). There is a paucity of clinical evidence in more complex patients who are often excluded from RCTs and long-term data up to 5 years are very limited in PAD revascularisation studies. This is a report of the 5-year outcomes from the prospective, single-arm, international IN.PACT Global Study. The IN.PACT Admiral DCB was evaluated for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease treatment in a real-world patient population. In total, 1,535 patients were enrolled at 64 international sites. The prespecified clinical cohort included 1,406 patients with claudication or rest pain. Patients were evaluated up to 5 years for the occurrence of adverse events and clinically driven target lesion revascularisations (CD-TLR). The mean lesion length was 12.1±9.5 cm in 1,774 lesions, 18.0% had in-stent restenosis, 35.5% were total occlusions and 68.7% were calcified. Per independent clinical events committee adjudication, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from CD-TLR up to 5 years was 69.4%, and the restricted mean survival time to first CD-TLR was 1,470.1 days. Outcomes were similar for males and females; freedom from CD-TLR was 69.1% in females and 69.6% in males (p=0.602). The cumulative incidence of major adverse events for the clinical cohort was 45.9% and freedom from all-cause mortality with the vital status update was 78.9% up to 5 years. The IN.PACT Admiral DCB demonstrated safe and durable outcomes in real-world participants with complex femoropopliteal disease. gov: NCT01609296.

First- Versus New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Heart Transplant With Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Although several studies have previously reported on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in heart transplant patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy, few data regarding new-generation DES are currently available. We sought to compare the efficacy of new-generation versus first-generation DES in 90 consecutive patients with heart transplant (113 de novo coronary lesions) who underwent urgent or elective PCI with first-generation (28 patients) or new-generation (62 patients) DES. For each patient, the severity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and postprocedural extent of revascularization were quantified calculating baseline and residual SYNTAX score, respectively. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events-myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or target vessel revascularization-at 3years. Overall, the median baseline SYNTAX score was 8 (5 to 15), and a total number of stents per patient of 1.6 ± 0.9 was implanted. Post-PCI residual SYNTAX score was 1.5 (0 to 4), with 13 patients having a score >8. At 3 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from major adverse cardiac events was 64%, with no differences between first-generation and new-generation DES groups (log-rank test p=0.269). Nevertheless, patients treated with new-generation DES experienced a lower rate of target vessel revascularization (15% vs 31%, log-rank test p=0.058). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, a post-PCI residual SYNTAX score >8 (hazard ratio 2.37, confidence interval 0.98 to 5.73, p=0.054) was identified as an independent predictor of the primary end point.

Volumetric analysis of effectiveness of embolization for preventing type II endoleaks following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveThe presence of endoleak was associated with the failure of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) treatment. The key to eliminating type II endoleak has shifted from reintervention to prevention. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of applying fibrin sealant to prevent type II endoleak in conjunction with EVAR. MethodsAll patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent EVAR from June 2019 to July 2021 were reviewed. Patients were grouped as Group A: standard EVAR with preemptive embolization and Group B: standard EVAR alone. The primary endpoint was the incidence of type II endoleak. The secondary endpoints were aneurysm sac regression, the inferior mesenteric artery patency, the numbers of patent lumbar arteries, and all-cause mortality. ResultsA total of 104 patients were included in Group A, and 116 were included in Group B. Technical success rate was 100%. The overall incidence of type II endoleak in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (4.8% vs 19.0%). The mean time of freedom from type II endoleak was 22.71 months for Group A (95% confidence interval, 21.59-23.83 months) and 19.89 months for Group B (95% confidence interval, 18.08-21.70 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from type II endoleak showed a significantly longer duration of freedom from type II endoleak in Group A (81.0% vs 95.2%). Group A showed a continuous sac regression tendency. In Group B, the sac volume decreased within 12 months but increased by 3.07 cm3 at 24 months. No complications were noted in both groups. ConclusionsNonselective preemptive embolization with porcine fibrin sealant during EVAR was safe and effective in preventing type II endoleak in the short and mid-term. Preemptive embolization can lead to a significantly higher sac regression rate. Larger patient populations and longer follow-ups with randomized control designed trials are expected to verify the long-term effectiveness and safety of preemptive embolization in preventing type II endoleak.

Composite Index Tagging for PVIinParoxysmal AF: A Prospective, Multicenter Postapproval Study.

VISITAG SURPOINT (VS)-guided ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has demonstrated good short- and long-term success rates with low rates of complications in recent, predominantly European, studies. However, there is a lack of multicenter data from the United States. This U.S. study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of VS ablation using a contact force-sensing catheter for the treatment of drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The prospective, nonrandomized VS postapproval study was conducted at 32 U.S. sites. Ablation consisted of pulmonary vein isolation with recommended VS index targets (anterior, roof, or ridge: 550; posterior or inferior: 380). Additional non-pulmonary vein triggers were ablated at the investigators' discretion. Subjects were followed for 12months, including a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was the primary adverse event rate up to 7days postablation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and an additional set of failure modes based on stringent monitoring (weekly transtelephonic monitoring [TTM] [day 91 through month 5], monthly TTM [months 6 to 12], and any symptomatic cardiac episode using TTM, plus electrocardiogram [atdischarge, 1month, 3months, 6months, and 12months] with 24-hour Holter monitoring [12months]). Of 283 patients enrolled, 261 had the catheter inserted and underwent ablation (safety cohort); 246 metall eligibility criteria (effectiveness cohort). Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.2minutes. Mean amount of catheter-delivered fluid was 671mL; only 18.0% of patients utilized a Foley catheter. Primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met. The raw primary adverse event rate was 4.3% (14 events, n=11). At 12months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from primary effectiveness failure was 76.4%; estimates of 12-month freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, or atrial flutter recurrence were 81.5% and 92.7% per stringent monitoring and standard-of-care monitoring (excluding TTM), respectively. The first-pass isolation rate was 83.1%, represented by no acute reconnection after the 30-minute waiting period. Freedom from repeat ablation at 12months was 94.0%. The VS postapproval study confirms reproducibility of clinical safety and effectiveness of the standardized VS paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation workflow with &gt;80% 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and first-pass isolation rate of 83.1%. Procedures were performed with minimal fluoroscopy. (Evaluation of VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module With External Processing Unit [EPU]; NCT03624881).

Outcomes of Endurant II Stent Graft According to Anatomic Severity Grade Score

Objectives: This study’s objective was to evaluate Endurant II (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota) stent graft’s early and midterm outcomes and compare the results according to the anatomic severity grade (ASG) scores. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients treated with the Endurant II stent graft between January 2013 and May 2021. The patients were divided into 2 independent groups, including those with a low ASG score (score <14) and a high ASG score (score >14). Results: A total of 165 consecutive patients (89% males, age 74±8 years) were included. There were 110 (67%) patients in the low-score group and 55 (33%) patients in the high-score group. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Primary clinical success at 30 days was 100% and at 1 year was 96%. Median operative time was longer in the high-score group with no statistical significance (133 vs 120 minutes, p=0.116). The median dose area product of low-score patients (50.9 Gy·cm2; IQR 22.4–75.5 Gy·cm2) was significantly lower than high-score patients (85.0 Gy·cm2; IQR 46.5–127.9 Gy·cm2) with p=0.025. Median fluoroscopic time was lower in low-score patients (17 minutes; IQR 13–24 minutes) compared with high-score patients (19 minutes; IQR 16–23 minutes) without a significant difference at p=0.148. At a midterm follow-up of 32 months (range 2–63 months), combined complications (29% vs 8%, p<0.001) and implant-related complications (13% vs 4%, p=0.043) were higher in the high-score group. Systemic complications at 30 days were higher in the high-score group without a statistically significant difference (15% vs 11%, p=0.500). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from reintervention was significantly higher in the low-risk group at 1 (97% vs 90%), 2 (96% vs 88%), and 3 years (96% vs 85%) with (p=0.035). The cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in the low-score group than high-score group (p=0.001) at 1 (99% vs 87%), 2 (98% vs 85%), and 3 years (96% vs 82%). Conclusions: Endurant II endovascular aneurysm repair seems to be safe in both low-score and high-score patients. However, patients in the high-score group showed more implant-related complications and midterm mortalities than those in the low-score group.