Journal Manuscripts Research Articles

Bibliometric Mapping of Dating Violence in Scopus and Web of Science

Introduction: Dating violence is a complex and multifaceted problem that affects people around the world. The objective was to evaluate the scientific production on dating violence in the Scopus and Web Of Science databases. Method: Scoping review was used as a method to analyze manuscripts in indexed journals. The search equations were designed with Boolean terms and operators. For the analysis of co-occurrences between authors and keywords, the Biblioshyni package was used. Results: The study covered the last 10 years, included 3077 publications from 735 journals, with a citation rate of 20.65 per document. 10499 authors participated, 92.95% of these were original articles and the most prominent authors are Miller E., Gibbs A., Decker M.R., and Silverman J.G., with the United States leading in production (49.89%). The Journal of Interpersonal Violence was the most prolific journal with 403 papers. Important thematic clusters were identified, such as violence in young couples, risk factors and interpersonal relationships, and aggression, in addition, an evolution from the approach of human and sexual relationships and violence in women was evidenced. The collaborative network showed strong connections between key authors such as Silverman, Miller, McCauley, Campbell, Stockman, Jewkes, and Gibbs. Conclusions: International collaboration and the concentration of studies in high-impact journals, mainly in the United States, underscore the need for multidisciplinary and culturally adapted approaches to effectively address and prevent dating violence. Received: 11 July 2024 / Accepted: 1 November 2024 / Published: 05 November 2024

The BIAD Standards: Recommendations for Archaeological Data Publication and Insights From the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database

Abstract This article presents a series of recommendations for the publication of archaeological data, to improve their usability. These 12 recommendations were formulated by archaeological data experts who mined thousands of publications for different data types (including funerary practices, accelerator mass spectrometry dating, stable isotopes, zooarchaeology, archaeobotany and pathologies) during the initial construction of the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database (BIAD). We also include data harmonisation vocabularies utilised for the integration of data from different recording systems. The case studies we cite to illustrate the recommendations are grounded in examples from the published literature and are presented in a problem/solution format. Though practically oriented towards the facilitation of efficient databasing, these recommendations – which we refer to as the BIAD Standards – are broadly applicable by those who want to extract scientific data from archaeological information, those who work with a specific region or theoretical focus and journal editors and manuscript authors. We anticipate that the use of the BIAD Standards will increase the usability, visibility, interoperability and longevity of published data and also increase the citations of those publications from which data were mined. The Standards will also help frame a unified foundation to support the continued integration of the natural sciences with archaeological research in the future.

Karen J. Foli: A Nurse Scholar With an Unconventional Trajectory.

Nurse scholar Karen J. Foli has had an unconventional trajectory. She has written everything from mysteries to thrillers to peer-reviewed journal manuscripts and Food and Drug Administration documents. She conceptualized and disseminated two middle-range theories, one surrounding parental postadoption depression and one surrounding nurses' psychological trauma. Foli's research has revealed a new type of nurse-specific trauma, insufficient resource trauma, which calls for efforts at the organizational level. Winner of several book of the year awards, she is now working on a third middle-range theory. Dr. Foli shares her journey and encourages nurses to give theory a shot.

Understanding bidirectional and transactional processes of child eating behaviours and parental feeding practices explaining poor health outcomes across infancy and early childhood in Australia: protocol for the Longitudinal Assessment of Children’s Eating (LACE) study

IntroductionChild eating behaviours develop through interactions between the child’s characteristics, psychological factors and the child’s social environment and this affects the child’s diet and weight. To examine the currently existing...

Fate of Abstracts Presented at Annual Meetings of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons from 2015 to 2019

Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) annual meetings provide opportunities to disseminate cardiothoracic research. We assessed rates of publication of STS abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals over five years and determined factors associated with successful publication. The STS "Annual Meeting Archive" was searched online for abstract books from STS annual meetings from 2015-2019. Abstract books were reviewed for information about presented abstracts. A PubMed and Google search was then performed to identify corresponding peer-reviewed journal publications. A total of 1451 abstracts were presented at STS annual meetings from 2015-2019. Overall publication rate of accepted abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals was 1097/1451=75.60%. Most published manuscripts were published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (750/1097=68.37%). Median duration between abstract presentation and peer-reviewed journal publication was 313[IQR=212.5-458] days. Only 29/1451=2.00% of abstracts won an award, and all 29 of these award-winning abstracts were published as a manuscript. Oral presentation was associated with increased odds of publication compared to poster presentation (OR=1.28[95% CI=1.04-1.71], p=0.021). Median 5-year impact factor of peer-reviewed journals containing these manuscripts was 5.04[IQR=5.04-5.04], and corresponding manuscripts were cited a median of 4[IQR=1-9] times. Overall, 836/1097=76.20% of manuscripts published in peer-reviewed scientific journals had a corresponding North American author. Annual STS meetings are a forum for the presentation of high-quality research. The rate of publication of accepted STS abstracts as manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals is >75%, comparing favorably with national meetings of other surgical societies, and >2/3 of published manuscripts are published in STS's official journal.

Digital HRM with Machine Learning Approach

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of how modern resource management resolves conventional challenges in that area. Computing technology with all its specific application variants will help human performance in HR management in the contemporary era. The rapid advancement of technology and digitalization has presented a digital economy characterized by business and the trade transactions based on technology. This study aims to analyze the influence of the digital economy as measured by the Value of Electronic Money Transactions and the Value of E-Commerce Transactions on Indonesia’s economic growth. This research method is descriptive qualitative with a literature study approach. The data sources used are journal manuscripts, books, and other sources that are in accordance with the theme of this study. The data will be elaborated to get the construction of relevant thoughts and reflect an adequate analysis of computers and human resource management in this modern era. The results of the study are computing is able to carry out administrative tasks automatically; computing is able to increase employee engagement; computing can help improve the recruitment and orientation process; computing can help ensure compliance; and computing can help drive data-driven decision making.

Investigating disparities in enrollment of patients in lung cancer clinical trials that led to FDA approval for immunotherapies between 2015 and 2023: A comparison with the US population.

e23104 Background: Registrational clinical trials have led to the FDA approval of numerous immunotherapy (IO) agents in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) since 2015. Given the historical lack of adequate representation of the US population with cancer in clinical trials, we aimed to analyze disparities in race and ethnicity reporting and enrollment in lung cancer clinical trials that led to FDA-approved immunotherapies between 2015-2023. Methods: The FDA archives and database were queried to review all FDA drug approvals for IO approved to treat NSCLC between 2015 to 2023. Enrollment data were obtained from FDA labels, ClinicalTrials.gov, and corresponding journal manuscripts. The enrollment incidence ratio (EIR) and enrollment mortality ratio (EMR) were calculated as the proportion of patients of a particular race among clinical trial participants in approval studies divided by the estimated proportion of patients of that particular race diagnosed or dying of lung cancer, respectively, among the US population. Results: Among 27 trials with a total of 15,878 subjects, distribution by race shows that 77.5% were White, 16.7% Asian, 8.8% Hispanic, 1.63% Black, 0.33% American Indian Alaska Native (AIAN), and 0.07% were Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI). 67.4% were males while 32.6% were females. The EIR for Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients was 0.99, 0.13, 3.56, and 0.85 respectively. The EMR for Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients was 0.99, 0.12, 4.23, and 0.96 respectively. Racial demographics were reported in 65% of journal manuscripts, 65% of ClinicalTrials.gov pages, and 92% of FDA labels while ethnicity demographics were reported in 0% of journal manuscripts, 42% of ClinicalTrials.gov pages, and 15% of FDA labels. Conclusions: Black, AIAN and female patients are severely underrepresented in lung cancer trials that lead to approval for IO based therapy. Asian patients were overrepresented. Less than half of the trials reported data on ethnicity. Further research is needed to see if regulatory initiatives to increase clinical trial diversity result in more equitable clinical trial enrollment in pivotal trials.

Stepping Up Summer Fun: the Cancer Research - Scholarship and Training Experience in Population Sciences (C-STEPS) Program.

Over the last two decades, strides in cancer prevention, earlier detection, and novel treatments have reduced overall cancer mortality; however, cancer health disparities (CHD) persist among demographically diverse and intersecting populations. The development of a culturally responsive workforce trained in interdisciplinary, team-based science is a key strategy for addressing these cancer disparities. The Cancer Research - Scholarship and Training Experience in Population Sciences (C-STEPS) program at the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center is designed to increase and diversify the biomedical and behavioral research workforce by providing specialized and experiential curricula that highlight team-oriented cancer control and population science. Undergraduate students interested in CHD and in pursuing STEM-H (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and health) graduate or professional degrees are eligible for the program. C-STEPS students are paired with a UNM faculty mentor, who guides the student's 10-week summer research experience. They receive mentorship and support from three layers-faculty, near-peers (graduate students), and peers (undergraduates who have completed the C-STEPS program previously). Students generate five products, including a capstone presentation, grounded in the research they conduct with their faculty mentors. Since its founding in 2021, C-STEPS has trained three cohorts with a total of 32 students. The C-STEPS program provides a unique team-science approach with multilayer mentoring to create a sustainable pipeline for the development of students interested in STEM-H fields and CHD research. The capstone project led to 47% of students presenting their work at conferences, and two publishing their manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals. Overall, 89% of students were either "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the program and the same percentage recommended the program to other undergraduates.

Optimising postgraduate supervision using multilevel modeling techniques in a constrained higher education environment

The paper developed a multilevel model (MLM) of postgraduate (PG) supervision to improve the academic publication and PG completion rate. Crowdsourcing essentials were used in the development of the model. The crowds consisted of the MLM made of students from Honours to doctoral levels. Teamwork was also implored, where the teams were level mates and supervisory teams. The simplest form of the model has the potential to generate over 65 academic manuscripts for journals. Monitoring of the supervision process can provide maximized completion of the PG research studies. Research capacity building would be effected for the doctoral and master’s students making them able to supervise and co-supervise from Honours to doctoral levels upon completion of their studies. The study condemned the use of a single supervisor for several doctoral students. It recommended the implementation of the model (the MLM PG Supervision Framework). It further recommended that doctoral students should be assigned co-supervisors, preferably varied for different students, to enable diversity in the supervision experience.

Ten Ways to Improve Getting a Scientific Manuscript Accepted.

Scientific publication is the cornerstone to academic and private practice advancement in patient management and outcomes. Writing a manuscript requires a certain discipline and skill set that can be achieved with diligence and hard work. Anecdotal and review. Several factors must be considered in scientific writing and journal manuscript submission and acceptance. Choosing where to submit the manuscript; understanding the instructions to authors; disclosing ethically; formatting correctly; never plagiarizing; supplying high quality appropriate images; creating meaningful tables; curating a pertinent but thorough bibliography; having valid, supported conclusions; andrespecting timelines. A discussion of relevant components in manuscript writing and journal submission to improve your chances of acceptance.

Abstract A034: A new international program to accelerate novel therapeutics for brain tumors: presenting the brain tumor research novel therapeutics accelerator

Abstract Each year, we see many journal manuscripts highlighting successful pre-clinical experiments for potential new brain tumor therapies. Only a few of these therapies move forward into successful clinical trials. Indeed, developing a comprehensive translational program covers many aspects, including but not limited to, medicinal chemistry, blood brain barrier penetration, tumor heterogeneity, delivery, commercialization, and navigating the regulatory environment. Because of this, bringing a successful translational project from bench to bedside requires access to a diverse set of cutting-edge expertise to give promising therapies the best chance of succeeding. Recognizing that this journey is not easy to navigate, the Tessa Jowell Brain Cancer Mission has launched an international Brain Tumor Research Novel Therapeutics Accelerator (BTR-NTA). This program is led by an international group of drug development and brain tumor experts who provide independent guidance to researchers to position their therapeutic along a realistic pathway to clinical trials. The BTR-NTA is open to any international academic and industry researchers developing a medicinal product, delivery technology or device for brain tumors. The BTR-NTA welcomes groups at any stage of pre-clinical or clinical work. Academics and smaller biotech’s could benefit from feedback on their pre-clinical studies and plans for commercialization, while larger pharmaceutical companies could benefit from access to brain tumor specific expertise and patient input into clinical trial design. Researchers can apply to BTR-NTA twice a year, and if accepted will go through the following process: 1. Complete an application form covering work to date and future plans under strict confidentiality agreements; 2. Attend an in-person meeting with a tailored group of experts to further discuss their work; and 3. Receive a comprehensive written report from the BTR-NTA committee with feedback on strengths and weaknesses and guidance on next steps. The expert committee dedicates half a day to reviewing the applicants’ work in-person, and extensive time pre- and post-meeting. Throughout the process, applicants receive up to 150 hours of expert input. The multidisciplinary nature of the review committee spans the entirety of the drug development pathway to support longitudinal collaboration and avoid a siloed approach to research. The BTR-NTA was designed after a similar program in another rare disease field yielded impressive results. Thanks to charitable funding, the BTR-NTA is free to academics and at low cost for industry. The BTR-NTA aims to help address barriers for researchers by highlighting potential pitfalls or risks, providing multi-disciplinary feedback on work to date, giving constructive guidance on next steps and strengthening international collaboration in the brain tumor field. The ultimate goal of the BTR-NTA is to enable researchers with therapy for brain tumors to navigate the drug development journey and make it to the clinic in a low-cost and timely way. Citation Format: Nicky Huskens, Charlotte Aitken, Katie Bushby. A new international program to accelerate novel therapeutics for brain tumors: presenting the brain tumor research novel therapeutics accelerator [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr A034.

On the elements of an excellent research paper

Journal publications play a key role in the dissemination of research findings in the biomedical acoustics community. However, authors are often unsure of how to write a paper that will be considered as excellent by their peers, because the notion of excellence is arguably subjective and ill-defined. To demystify such an issue, this presentation will discuss four major elements (novelty, significance, rigor, writing quality) that are often found in excellent journal papers in biomedical ultrasound. Since 2022, these four elements have been adopted as the peer review criteria by the flagship ultrasonics journal of the IEEE press. Multi-day writing workshops with interactive, hands-on tutorials have been designed to engage prospective authors on how to plan and prepare journal manuscripts with the four elements of excellence. Reviewer training workshops have also been offered to inform journal reviewers about these evaluation criteria and expectations. Through these initiatives, we aim to establish a quality-driven publishing emphasis within the biomedical acoustics community. Achieving so will have long-term benefits on the reputation and growth of this research field.

Pelatihan Manajemen Chat GPT dalam Membuat Manuskrip Jurnal Nasional Terakreditasi Bagi Mahasisiwi MPI Universitas Nurul Jadid

Students have difficulty designing or writing manuscripts that will be published in accredited national journals. The purpose of this service is to provide solutions with training and mentoring activities for female students who will or are writing accredited scientific journal manuscripts by utilizing Chat GPT management both theoretically and practically. The action learning method, which consists of several stages starting with preparation, implementation, and evaluation, is the method used in this service, which is carried out face-to-face. The results of this service have a very significant impact on female students in making national journal manuscripts, starting from making titles to pamphlets with Chat GPT management. This can be seen from the test results before and after the training

PERKEMBANGAN HUKUM ISLAM PASCA PERIODE TAQLID (KEMAPANAN MAZHAB)

Islamic law experienced dullness and decline after the period of taklid. However, that period disappeared after Muslims sought a solution so as not to be left behind from the West which was increasingly advanced while Islam was the opposite. The revolution of Islamic thought was present during the progress of Islam after blind taklid, spearheaded by Islamic thinkers of his time, such as Abdul, Sheikh Muhammad as- Sirhindi, Sayyid Ahmad Syahid, Muhammad Abdul Wahab and so on, which made Islamic law and Islamic thought advance again. This research aims to analyze the development of Islamic law after the taqlid period. This research uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach as a data search process. Primary and secondary data are obtained from books, electronic journal manuscripts that have been published in journals that have national and international reputations related to the development of Islamic law during the taqlid period. After the data has been obtained, data analysis is carried out to find answers to the problems raised and after that the real conclusion is drawn. The results showed that Islamic law experienced a period of development, one of which is called the Awakening period which began in the second part of the 19th century until now, with the central figures being Jalaluddin Al-Afghani (1839-1897) and Muhammad Abduh (1849-1905). Their thoughts were heavily influenced by those of Ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328). The first characteristic is the call to establish Pan Islamism and make comprehensive changes to the Islamic world, especially in the field of utilizing reason over the Qur'an and Sunnah and at the same time releasing ties from the shackles of the madhhab. Mazhab is something common, but excessive bigotry against the mazhab is something that perishes and destroys. Second, the approach to Islamic law through Mazhab Comparison, both the Shafi'i, Maliki, Hanafi and Hambali madhabs plus the Shi'a Mazhab. Comparisons are even made with Western legal systems and other laws. Third, it is characterized by considerable attention from the European and Western world in general to study Islamic law so that they make Islamic law an official subject in the Faculty of Law. Fourth, from the development of Islamic law is the tendency in Muslim countries to return to Islamic Law as seen in the Middle East and in Southeast Asia. Even if the country is not an Islamic state, the law applied in it is Islamic law.

COMPARISON OF THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS IN INDONESIA BEFORE AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A LITERATURE REVIEW

This journal manuscript is the result of a literature review analyzing approaches to evaluating regional government financial performance in Indonesia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research uses a systematic literature review method with a sample of 20 articles. The results of the analysis show that the independence, efficiency and effectiveness ratios are the main ratios used in evaluating regional government financial performance. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on financial performance with the majority of studies recording a decline in performance in 2020, although some cases experienced an increase. Further research is needed to understand the long-term impact of the pandemic on the financial performance of local governments in Indonesia.

Systematic Review of Best Management Practice Implementation for Agricultural Phosphorus Management in Florida: A 30-Year Overview

Highlights BMPs have been proven to be efficient in managing P loads in Florida. BMP efficiencies vary between 20% and 80%, with few higher than 50%. Integration of modeling strategies and field demonstrations could improve BMP efficiencies. Further implementation of testbeds and pilot studies could improve adoption and enhance our understanding of BMP efficiency. Abstract. In Florida, the implementation of best management practices (BMPs) has significantly reduced phosphorous (P) loads from the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) into the Lake Okeechobee watershed over the past two decades. While the removal of over 6,165 metric tons of total phosphorus entering the Everglades Protection Area is a notable achievement, some freshwater sources continue to exceed established limits (Naja et al., 2017), demanding a critical examination of BMP efficiency at managing low P concentrations. In this systematic literature review, we analyzed peer-reviewed journal manuscripts published over the past 30 years, focusing on the intersection of phosphorus management, water, Florida, and the environment. The dataset synthesized from our review provides insights into the efficiency of BMPs in terms of P management over time. Our findings show a predominant focus on stormwater treatment areas (STAs) and constructed wetlands as BMPs with demonstrated good efficiency. However, the variability in reported efficiencies underscores the complexity of phosphorus pollution and its impacts. Treatment trains ranged from 20% to 39% for the lower range of efficiency in phosphorus removal and from 60% to 79% for the higher range of efficiency. Focusing on strategies with higher P load reduction efficiencies could enhance future management strategies in Florida. Field-based pilot studies with well-defined control settings can facilitate long-term evaluations of P management programs that allow the implementation of BMPs. Similarly, the evaluation of new technologies, including materials, precision-smart practices, and the integration of modeling strategies with field-scale studies suggest a promising approach to engaging stakeholders in achieving higher BMP efficiencies. This systematic review highlights current BMP strategies that have demonstrated high P load reduction efficiency. There is a need for continued research that simultaneously assesses strategies to reduce P pollution before it forms and employs a multidimensional approach to P management. This approach should integrate multiple successful BMPs through field and modeling strategies. Keywords: , Agriculture, Best Management Practices (BMP), Florida, Non-point source pollutants, Phosphorus loads.

The Gender Gap in Surgical Literature: Are We Making Progress?

IntroductionThe percentage of women in surgical leadership roles is not commensurate with percent of women in field of surgery. Citation indexes are used as proxy for scholarly impact and may serve as an indicator of women's progress in academic surgery. We aimed to evaluate gender disparities in authorship of surgery manuscripts in high-impact journals. MethodsIn this bibliometric analysis of original research articles from four high-impact surgical journals from 2008 to 2010 (period A) and 2018-2020 (period B), the gender of primary and senior authors was assigned by Genderize.io. Number of citations per article was identified via Web of Science. Number of citations by gender of authors was compared across time periods. ResultsOf the 3575 articles (Period A = 1915; Period B = 1660), 962 (26.9%) had women as primary authors and 590 (17.2%) as senior authors. Over time, significant increases in women primary and senior authorship were noted from 22.8% to 31.7% (P < 0.001) and 13.9% (254/11,915) to 21% (336/1660), respectively (P < 0.001). Articles written with women primary authors had fewer median (interquartile range) citations than those by men as primary author in period A (39 [17-69.5] versus 42 [20.0-84.0]; P = 0.005). Gender parity was noted in period B (9 [4-19] versus 9 [4-20] citations; P = 0.307). In period A, articles written by women as both primary and senior authors had approximately 25% fewer median citations compared with those by men (34 [17-62] versus 44 [21-86]); P < 0.011), and this reached parity in period B (9 [4-20] versus 9 [4-21]); P < 0.658). ConclusionsOverall, gender authorship and citations parity are improving in high-impact surgery journals.

Scope, Opportunity and challenges of Polyester Staple Fiber (PSF) Production in Bangladesh

Polyester Staple Fiber (PSF) is an important synthetic textile fiber used in various industries, including apparel, home furnishings, and industrial textiles. Bangladesh, a developing country with a growing textile industry, has the potential to become a major producer of PSF. This journal manuscript presents an in-depth analysis of the scope, opportunities, and challenges of PSF production in Bangladesh. The scope of PSF production in Bangladesh is vast due to the country's low labor costs and availability of raw materials. Additionally, the government's support for the textile industry through incentives and infrastructure development provides further opportunities for PSF production. However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed, including the high cost of importing machinery and technology, the lack of skilled labor and technical expertise, and the need for investment in research and development. Moreover, environmental concerns related to the production process, such as waste management and energy efficiency, need to be addressed for sustainable development of the PSF industry in Bangladesh. The manuscript presents an overview of the current state of the PSF industry in Bangladesh, including production processes, raw materials, and export markets, as well as an analysis of the industry's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Overall, the manuscript highlights the potential of the PSF industry in Bangladesh for growth and development, provided the challenges are addressed and a strategic approach to the industry's development is taken. The manuscript concludes with recommendations for policymakers, investors, and industry players to promote sustainable and inclusive growth of the PSF industry in Bangladesh.

We agree completely with the reviewer, but … ”: Stance in author rebuttal letters for journal manuscript reviews

Authors’ rebuttal letters (ARLs) in response to journal reviewers critically affect whether a paper is accepted or rejected. However, the genre is traditionally “occluded” from the public view, and its linguistic or rhetorical features are seldom examined in the literature. Using Hyland’s (2005) model, this study analyzes stance markers, i.e., expressions of the speaker’s attitudes towards or commitment concerning a proposition, in 50 ARLs from five high-impact Nature Portfolio journals, which started publishing ARLs as supplements to manuscripts in 2020. The analysis shows that authors’ stance deployment differs markedly between different sections of the ARL, i.e., Opening Statement, Point-by-Point Response, Additional Changes, and Closing Remarks. Attitude markers, boosters, and self-mentions are more frequent in ARLs than in research articles, serving to advocate the paper, highlight improvements, and show gratitude towards reviewers. Only 6 % ARLs fully accommodate all reviewer suggestions. When rejecting a criticism, authors rarely express total disagreement with reviewers, choosing instead to hedge the No Revision claims, use expressions of agreement and gratitude as buffers, and boost positive aspects of the paper. Findings of this study may be of interest to those who seek a better understanding of the language of ARLs, including ESP teachers and novice researchers.

How can NHS trusts in England optimise strategies to improve the mental health and well-being of hospital doctors? The Care Under Pressure 3 (CUP3) realist evaluation study protocol

IntroductionThe growing incidence of mental ill health in doctors was a major issue in the UK and internationally, even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. It has significant and far-reaching implications,...