Joint-sparing Procedures Research Articles

Isolated Talonavicular Arthrodesis as Treatment for Flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: A Case Series.

For the younger, more active patient with flexible symptomatic progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), joint-sparing procedures may be preferred to preserve functional motion. Isolated talonavicular (TN) arthrodesis has been described for treatment of rigid and flexible PCFD for patients that are older and less active whose deformity is still correctable through the TN joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with PCFD treated with isolated triplanar correction with a TN joint arthrodesis. Forty-nine patients (53 feet) with flexible PCFD underwent isolated TN arthrodesis. Weightbearing radiographs were performed pre- and postoperatively, and measurements included lateral talar-first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch, TN coverage angle, and the anteroposterior (AP) talar-first metatarsal angle. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and Veterans-Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) scores were also collected. Thirty-five females and 14 males were evaluated with a mean age of 63 years, at an average follow-up of 41.3 months. Significant improvements were found radiographically. Lateral radiographs demonstrated improvements in lateral talar-first metatarsal angle from 25.2 degrees preoperatively to 9.5 degrees postoperatively (P < .001) and calcaneal pitch from 14.9 degrees preoperatively to 17.5 degrees postoperatively (P < .001). AP radiographs showed the TN coverage angle improving from 35.0 degrees to 4.9 degrees postoperatively (P < .001) and AP talar-first metatarsal angle improving from 17.3 degrees to 5.9 degrees postoperatively (P < .001). Clinical outcomes were improved in the FAAM pain score (48.6 to 39.2, P = .130), FAAM ADL score (53.8 to 69.2, P = .002), FAAM Sport score (29.5 to 40.7, P = .099), and the overall FAAM score (47.7 to 63.1, P = .006). Patient satisfaction with medical care was 85.2/100 postoperatively. Isolated TN arthrodesis is a viable surgical option for older, lower-demand patients with flexible PCFD. This study demonstrated significant improvements in radiographic alignment and FAAM scores. Comparative studies with other surgical procedures should be performed to determine which is the best technique for older, lower-demand patients with flexible PCFD. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of Hindfoot Joint-Sparing Reconstructive Procedures for Flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: A Prospective Cohort Study

Category: Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Treatment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) is controversial and surgical procedures utilized usually depend on the type and rigidity of deformities present (PCFD classes and stages), degree of soft tissue involvement, and surgeon’s preference. Multiple surgical procedures are usually performed concomitantly to achieve adequate correction. Prospective data regarding the utilization of hindfoot joint-sparing reconstructive procedures in the treatment of flexible PCFD is scarce, and little is known about the influence of the different procedures utilized to treat PCFD in deformity correction and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the most used hindfoot joint-sparing procedures utilized by a single-surgeon to treat flexible PCFD, and the influence of the utilized procedures in deformity pattern corrections, and PROs. Methods: IRB-approved, prospective, and comparative cohort study. Adult PCFD patients with flexible deformity (stage 1), no history of surgical treatment, and that failed conservative treatment for &gt;3-months were enrolled. Patients underwent surgical treatment by a single-surgeon. Patients were excluded if a hindfoot fusion procedure was needed intra-operatively to achieve correction. Types, numbers, and sizes of surgical procedures utilized were recorded. Weight-bearing CT (WBCT) measurements of overall 3D deformity, Classes A (hindfoot valgus), B (abduction), C (medial column instability), D (peritalar subluxation), and E (ankle valgus tilt) were assessed preoperatively, and at first 3-months WBCT. PROs were recorded preoperatively and at the most recent follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to report the frequency of deformity and procedures utilized. Pre and postoperative measurements and PROs were compared with paired T-tests/Wilcoxon. Multivariate regression analysis was used to correlate procedures utilized with deformity correction and PROs. P-values of &gt;0.05 were considered significant. Results: A total of 29 patients included (28 feet, 79%F, 21%M), mean age and BMI of respectively 47.6-years and 34kg/m2. Average number of procedures performed was five and mean follow-up was 19.1 months (range, 3 to 40). Frequency and sizes of medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO), first ray plantarflexion procedure (Cotton/LapiCoton), and lateral column lengthening (LCL) procedures were, respectively: 100% (8.9mm displacement), 100% (66% Lapicotton/34% Cotton, 8.3mm wedge-opening) and 39% (6.8mm wedge-opening). Soft-tissue procedures performed: 83% Posterior tibial tendon (re-tensioning/FDL transfer/allograft reconstruction), 34% peroneal tendon (brevis-to-longus and brevis lengthening), 76% gastrocnemius-recession, 38% spring ligament (re-tensioning/reconstruction/augmentation) and 31% deltoid ligament (re- tensioning/reconstruction/augmentation). Significant improvement postoperatively was observed in all PCFD measurements performed and PROs (Figure). However, no direct correlation was found between procedures performed/measurement improvements and PROs. Conclusion: In this prospective comparative cohort study of flexible PCFD patients undergoing surgical treatment with hindfoot joint sparing surgical procedures, we observed significant postoperative improvement in all deformity patterns assessed (Classes A, B, C, and D) as well as PROs. MDCO and first ray plantarflexion procedures (Cotton or LapiCotton) were the most commonly utilized procedures and were performed in all cases. Even though deformity correction and PRO improvements were observed postoperatively, no direct correlation was observed between PROs and specific surgical procedures performed or deformity pattern corrections (PCFD classes).

Management of giant cell tumors of the distal radius

BackgroundThe distal radius is the most common location for giant cell tumors (GCT) in the upper extremity. Treatment should balance the goals of maximizing function and minimizing recurrence and other complications. Given the complexity in surgical treatment, various techniques have been described without clear standards of treatment. ObjectivesThe purpose of this review is to provide an overview of evaluation of patients presenting with GCT of the distal radius, discuss management, and provide an updated summary on outcomes of treatment options. ConclusionSurgical treatment should consider tumor Grade, involvement of the articular surface, and patient-specific factors. Options include intralesional curettage and en bloc resection with reconstruction. Within reconstruction techniques, radiocarpal joint preserving and sparing procedures can be considered. Campanacci Grade 1 tumors can be successfully treated with joint preserving procedures, whereas for Campanacci Grade 3 tumors consideration should be given to joint resection to prevent recurrence. Treatment of Campanacci Grade 2 tumors is debated in the literature. Intralesional curettage and adjuvants can successfully treat cases where the articular surface can be preserved, while en-bloc resection should be used in cases where the articular surface cannot undergo aggressive curettage. A variety of reconstructive techniques are used for cases needing resection, with no clear gold standard. Joint sparing procedures preserve motion at the wrist joint, whereas joint sacrificing procedures preserve grip strength. Choice of reconstructive procedure should be made based on patient-specific factors, considering relative functional outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates.

Giant cell tumour of bone.

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion that is difficult to treat as salvaging the joint can be associated with a high rate of local recurrence (LR). We evaluated the risk factors for tumour relapse after treatment of a GCTB of the limbs. A total of 354 consecutive patients with a GCTB underwent joint salvage by curettage and reconstruction with bone graft and/or cement or en bloc resection. Patient, tumour, and treatment factors were analyzed for their impact on LR. Patients treated with denosumab were excluded. There were 53 LRs (15%) at a mean 30.5 months (5 to 116). LR was higher after curettage (18.4%) than after resection (4.6%; p = 0.008). Neither pathological fracture (p = 0.240), Campanacci grade (p = 0.734), soft-tissue extension (p = 0.297), or tumour size (p = 0.872) affected the risk of recurrence. Joint salvage was possible in 74% of patients overall (262/354), and 98% after curettage alone (262/267). Of 49 patients with LR after curettage, 44 (90%) underwent repeated curettage and joint salvage. For patients treated by curettage, only age less than 30 years (p = 0.042) and location in the distal radius (p = 0.043) predicted higher LR. The rate of LR did not differ whether cement or bone graft was used (p = 0.753), but may have been reduced by the use of hydrogen peroxide (p = 0.069). Complications occurred in 15.3% of cases (54/354) and did not differ by treatment. Most patients with a GCTB can undergo successful joint salvage by aggressive curettage, even in the presence of a soft-tissue mass, pathological fracture, or a large lesion, with an 18.4% risk of local recurrence. However, 90% of local relapses after curettage can be treated by repeat joint salvage. Maximizing joint salvage is important to optimize long-term function since most patients with a GCTB are young adults. Younger patients and those with distal radius tumours treated with joint-sparing procedures have a higher rate of local relapse and may require more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up.

3D Printed Total Talus Replacement after Free Vascularized Medial Femoral Condyle Osteocutaneous Flap for Avascular Necrosis of the Talus Leads to Poor Clinical Outcomes

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Talar avascular necrosis (AVN) is a difficult pathology to diagnose and manage. Traditional treatment options include both joint sparing procedures (vascularized bone graft, core decompression, intraosseous stem cell injection) and joint sacrificing procedures (arthrodesis or arthroplasty). Three dimensional (3D) printed total talus replacement (TTR) has recently gained more popularity as an intervention to salvage joint motion in patients with talus pathology. Although vascularized bone grafting can treat localized talar AVN, failure of this procedure to improve talar vascularity and prevent further subchondral collapse may require revision surgery. This is the first study to compare outcomes of patients with talar AVN who underwent primary 3D printed TTR and patients who underwent a secondary TTR subsequent to failure of a free vascularized medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap. Methods: This case series analyzed the outcomes of two patients who underwent a secondary 3D printed TTR subsequent to failure of the index revascularization procedure using an MFC flap in 2016. These patients were compared to a cohort of patients who underwent a primary 3D printed TTR to treat talar AVN between 2016 and 2019. Preoperative and postoperative assessment included ankle range of motion, foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and radiographic imaging. A minimum 12-month follow-up period was reported for patients. Results: Within the group that underwent a secondary TTR after a failed revascularization, both patients had a mean followup of 23.5 months. The 25 patients in the comparison group who all underwent a primary 3D printed TTR had an mean follow-up period of 22.1 (range:12-43) months. All patients in the study experienced improved VAS pain scores and ankle dorsiflexion post- operatively. In the secondary 3D printed TTR group, both patients demonstrated reduced plantarflexion of 20 degrees and ankle motion of 15 degrees relative to the comparison group which showed a minimal increase in both. When analyzing FAOS functional outcome score subscales, patient two demonstrated improvement in pain from 44 to 46, symptoms from 29 to 46, and activities of daily living from 47 to 76. Patient one experienced a decrease in sports and recreation from 15 to 5 and quality of life from 38 to 31. Conclusion: This case series demonstrated poor functional outcomes of two patients who underwent 3D printed TTR after talar revascularization with MFC grafts when compared to the cohort of patients who solely underwent a primary 3D printed TTR for talar AVN. Further investigation is warranted to determine which patients may benefit from a revascularization procedure or a primary 3D printed TTR.

Analysis of Corrective Distal Tibio-Fibular Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors: Consecutive 67 Cases in One Center

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle; Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: A supramalleolar osteotomy is a joint-sparing procedure that can change the mechanical axis load on the ankle joint in the coronal-sagittal planes. Restoration of the axial alignment allows for redistribution of loads to the less affected area of articular cartilage, slowing down or even stopping further articular degeneration. It has been reported that supramalleolar osteotomy has a useful effect in asymmetric varus ankle and medial compartment osteoarthritis, but as far as we know there are not many papers conducted in one center for large cases based study. In our paper, we analyzed the results of multiple cases (67 cases) of supramalleolar osteotomy surgical procedure performed in our center and make insight about prognostic factors like high talar tilt and takakura stage. Methods: From August 2007 to May 2020, a retrospective study was conducted on 67 ankles which underwent distal tibio-fibular osteotomy due to medial compartment osteoarthritis and asymmetric varus ankle in our center. The articular cartilage was evaluated simultaneously with the distal tibio-fibular osteotomy through arthroscopy exam intraoperatively. The mean age was 58.6 years(range 37-73 years). American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Visual analog scale (Vas) pain score, Range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction were used for functional evaluations. Ankle osteoarthritis was classified by Takakura stage, and the tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), tibial lateral surface angle (TLS) and talar tilt angle were measured for radiological evaluations. And, groups were divided according to the Takakura stage, and whether there were significant differences in the measured values was compared. Results: When Preop IIIB and Preop II, IIIA groups were compared, last fu AOFAS score and Pain vas score showed no significant difference. Talar tilt angle showed significant higher value in Preop IIIB group(p&lt;0.05). And TAS angle showed bigger correction in Preop IIIB group with borderline difference. (p=0.07) It seems that overcorrected TAS angle came out to maximize the effect of load transfer to laterally intra-operatively. And it is thought that the overcorrected TAS angle had a good effect on the clinical outcome. When Preop IIIB group were divided stage improved group with not improved group and compared each other, last fu AOFAS score and ROM showed worse results in Postop IIIB group significantly. (p&lt;0.05) Talar tilt showed higher value in Postop IIIB group on preop with borderline differences.(p=0.06) TAS angle showed no significant differences.(p=0.58) Conclusion: We performed SMO for stage IIIB medial ankle OA with significant TAS overcorrection, and achieved favorable clinical outcomes (AOFAS 85.1) when compared with preop stage IIIA group (AOFAS 85.6). Postop stage IIIB group showed higher preop talar tilt angles with poor AOFAS score when compared with postop takakura stage improved group (10.7 and 7.6). Many preop IIIB cases are found to be good candidate for SMO, but skillful selection for SMO is required for good results.

Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Is Uncommon after Intralesional Curettage in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is most often treated with intralesional curettage; however, periarticular lesions have been shown to increase risk for osteoarthritis. Additionally, the location of these lesions may occasionally preclude a joint-sparing procedure in recurrent tumors. This study sought to investigate rates of secondary arthroplasty in long-term follow-up of knee GCTB. Cases of knee GCTB treated at our institution were reviewed. Rates of recurrence and secondary arthroplasty were recorded, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. The records of 40 patients were reviewed. Local recurrence occurred in 25% of patients. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) probability was 87.4% (95% CI, 77.0-97.7), 72.4% (95% CI, 57.6-87.2), and 72.4% (95% CI, 57.6-87.2), respectively. Function improved after surgery with a mean preoperative MSTS score of 14.9 (standard deviation [SD] 8.4) and mean postoperative MSTS score of 25.1 (SD 5.6) (p <0.001). Three patients had evidence of radiographic osteoarthritis at the last follow-up though they did not require arthroplasty. Arthroplasty was performed as a secondary procedure in six patients. Five patients underwent arthroplasty for recurrent tumors after initial treatment with curettage and one patient underwent patellar arthroplasty for osteoarthritis after initial treatment with an allograft composite arthroplasty. Arthroplasty is performed as a secondary procedure in patients with GCTB at a relatively infrequent rate and more often for cases of recurrent disease than for osteoarthritis. Overall, patients treated for GCTB have improved functional outcomes after surgery than before. Large, multi-institutional studies may be required to assess the incidence of secondary osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty as this was an infrequent finding in our cohort.

Knee osteoarthritis Disease: A review

Osteoarthritis of the knee is a complex peripheral joint disorder with multiple risk factors. The molecular basis of osteoarthritis has been generally accepted; however, the exact pathogenesis is still not known. Management of patients with osteoarthritis involves a comprehensive history, thorough physical examination and appropriate radiological investigation. The relative slow progress in the disease allows a stepwise algorithmic approach in treatment. Non-surgical treatment involves patient education, lifestyle modification and the use of orthotic devises. These can be achieved in the community. Surgical options include joint sparing procedures such as arthroscopyando osteotomy or joint-replacing procedures. Joint-replacing procedures can be isolated to a single compartment such as patellofemoral arthroplasty or unicompartmental knee replacement or total knee arthroplasty. The key to a successful long-term outcome is optimal patient selection, preoperative counselling and good surgical technique.

Effect of Prior Joint-sparing Surgery on Outcomes of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

Category:Midfoot/Forefoot; OtherIntroduction/Purpose:Joint-sparing procedures such as cheilectomy are alternatives to first metatarsophalangeal fusion (MTPF) for treatment of hallux rigidus. These procedures have the proposed benefit of preserving joint motion and allowing for subsequent fusion if necessary. Despite the low incidence of revision after cheilectomy, some patients require subsequent MTPF due to arthritis progression or failure of symptom resolution. Prior studies have not compared outcomes between patients undergoing arthrodesis after cheilectomy and patients undergoing primary MTPF. The objective of this study was to determine if a history of a prior cheilectomy affected patient reported outcomes in patients treated with MPTF. We hypothesized that there would be no differences in outcomes between patients with and without history of prior cheilectomy.Methods:This retrospective cohort study included adult patients treated with MTPF for hallux rigidus with preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. Patients with no prior joint-sparing procedure (primary MTPF group) were assigned to one cohort, and patients with history of prior cheilectomy were assigned to another. Initial comparisons in preoperative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), pain intensity (Pint), global physical health (PH), global mental health (MH), and depression (D) scores were made using Mann-Whitney U tests. Postoperative PROMIS scores were compared using multivariable linear regression, controlling for age, BMI, gender, and preoperative scores. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to assess improvement in preoperative to postoperative scores in both groups.Results:A total of 127 patients (100 primary MTPF, 27 prior cheilectomy) with average follow-up of 19.6 months were included. Patient demographics including BMI, age, and gender distribution were similar between groups. Preoperative PF scores in the prior cheilectomy group were significantly worse than the primary MTPF group (median 40.5 vs 43.3, p<0.05). Table 1 illustrates the results of Wilcoxon signed rank tests demonstrating changes in scores in each PROMIS domain. There were no significant differences in postoperative PROMIS scores between the primary MTPF and prior cheilectomy groups.Conclusion:Patients undergoing MTPF for treatment of hallux rigidus both with and without a history of cheilectomy had no differences in postoperative outcomes as measured by PROMIS. Patients undergoing cheilectomy can be counseled that if the need to pursue MTPF arises due to arthritis progression or failure of symptom resolution, their postoperative function and pain after the fusion may not be affected by the cheilectomy.

Pelvic Osteotomies for Treatment of Young Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis Secondary to Developmental Dysplasia

Background. The value of joint-sparing reconstructive procedures in patients with osteoarthritis in a dysplastic hip is controversial.&#x0D; The study aimed to evaluate the immediate and mid-term results of reconstructive interventions performed in patients with this pathology.&#x0D; Methods. The treatment results of 30 patients aged 1440 years with osteoarthritis in the dysplastic hip were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 6.81.5 years in group 1 and 4.10.7 years in group 2. The clinical condition and treatment results were assessed by DAubigne-Postel, Severin, Tonnis criteria, and the Ilizarov Center system. In all cases, extra-articular reconstructive procedures were performed on both articular components.&#x0D; Results. The patients were divided into two groups by age. In group 1 (1418 years), the functional result was 16.00.5 points. According to the Severin criteria, the joints were distributed as follows: Ia, 7; IIa, 7; IIb, 2; and III, 3. The degree of hip osteoarthritis did not change in 13 joints. Osteoarthritis progressed in one joint, and arthritic changes regressed in four joints. The treatment results according to the criteria of the RSC VTO were good in 14 joints, satisfactory in 5, and unsatisfactory in 1. In group 2 (18 years, n = 11), the functional result was 15.00.4 points. The distribution of joints according to the Severin criteria was as follows: Ia, 3; IIa, 6, and III, 2. The degree of osteoarthritis did not change in 10 joints. Osteoarthritis progressed in one joint. The treatment results according to the criteria of the Ilizarov Center were good in seven joints, satisfactory in three, and unsatisfactory in one.&#x0D; Conclusions. The differentiated use of joint-sparing reconstructive procedures makes it possible to slow down the progression of the pathological process in the joint even in patients with developed osteoarthritis and, in some cases, to use them as a temporary alternative to endoprosthesis in adolescents and young adults.

Diaphyseal Proximal Phalangeal Shortening Osteotomy for Correction of Hammertoe Deformity: Operative Technique and Radiological Outcomes.

Correction of hammertoe deformities at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint results in an inherent loss of motion that can be a concern for active patients who want to maintain toe function and grip strength. Diaphyseal proximal phalangeal shortening osteotomy (DPPSO) is a joint-sparing procedure resecting a cylindrical portion of the proximal phalanx on the middiaphysis. This was a retrospective review including patients treated using DPPSO with at least a 1-year follow-up. Demographic, comorbidity, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and complication data were obtained. Radiological assessment included union status and alignment. Medial frontal anatomical (mFAA), frontal proximal interphalangeal (mFIA), plantar lateral anatomical (pLAA), and medial and plantar lateral interphalangeal angles (pLIA) were measured. A total of 31 patients (45 toes) were included, with a mean age of 59 years (range: 24-72) and follow-up of 35 months (range: 12-60; mean preoperative VAS score was 4.9 ± 1.72 improving to 1.62 ± 2.28; P < .01). Union occurred in all patients at an average of 11.2 weeks. Complications were present on 4 toes (8.8%), with no recurrences. The pLIA significantly changed from 44.9° to 17.9°. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative values of the mFAA, pLAA, and mFIA. DPPSO provides adequate pain relief and corrects the PIP joint in the lateral plane without significantly affecting the coronal plane or the anatomical axis of the phalanx in the frontal and lateral views, nor producing secondary deformities. DPPSO is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique with a low complication rate. Level IV: Retrospective case series.

All-Arthroscopic Muscle Slide and Advancement Technique to Repair Massive Retracted Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

Symptomatic massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral joint arthritis and chronic medial retraction often are deemed “irreparable.” These patients often are treated with alternative joint-sparing procedures including superior capsular reconstruction or tendon transfer procedures. Open and arthroscopic-assisted muscle advancement techniques allow maximal lateral tendon mobilisation during rotator cuff repair. In this report, we present an all-arthroscopic technique of complete supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle scapular detachment and advancement in retracted massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. This allows for an anatomical tendon footprint reduction and tension-free repair.

The role of Denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of bone.

Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up. Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma. A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 33.8 years (18 to 67) with high-risk GCTB received median six cycles of Denosumab before surgery. Tumours occurred most commonly around the knee (17/25, 68%). The median follow-up was 57 months (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 88). The joint was salvaged in 23 patients (92%). Two required knee arthroplasty due to intra-articular fracture and arthritis. Local recurrence developed in 11 patients (44%) at a mean of 32.5 months (3 to 75) following surgery, of whom four underwent repeat curettage and joint salvage. One patient developed secondary osteosarcoma and another benign GCT lung metastases. The use of Denosumab for joint salvage was associated with a higher than expected rate of local recurrence at 44%. Neoadjuvant Denosumab for joint-sparing procedures should be considered with caution in light of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):184-191.

Mid-Carpal Joint Sparing Procedure for Idiopathic Avascular Necrosis of Capitate

Background Avascular necrosis of the capitate (AVNC) is an uncommon pathology of the wrist. Several procedures have been described for the treatment of AVNC. The type of treatment varies depending upon the stages. In early stages, revascularization procedures are performed. If secondary osteoarthritis develops, then the treatment options include intercarpal fusion, four corner fusion, prosthesis replacement of the capitate, tendon interposition, and wrist arthrodesis. No long-term study is available for choosing an appropriate method of the treatment for AVNC. Case Description Herein, we report a case of AVNC that was managed by hemi-resection of the capitate with capito-hamate fusion and tendon interposition. One year after surgery, patient was asymptomatic and radiographs revealed fusion of capito-hamate joint and maintenance of the mid-carpal joint space. There was no evidence of carpal collapse. Literature Review All the literature about mid-carpal joint sparing (MCJS) procedures has been reviewed in this report. This is a goal behind writing of this case report as there have been very few publications about these procedures. Clinical Relevance This case illustrates the successful treatment of AVNC by MCJS procedure. The intercarpal fusion and the four corner fusion are one time procedures, and these can be used if the MCJS procedure fails or sometimes, as primary procedure, if the patient gives consent for the same. It appears prudent to save arthrodesis procedures for the future.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Correction of Adult Acquired Flat Foot Deformity: An Anatomic Study

Category:Midfoot/Forefoot; HindfootIntroduction/Purpose:Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a complex and chronic debilitating condition characterized by a decrease in the medial arch height and, in advanced stages, a decrease in the talonavicular coverage angle as the forefoot drifts into pronation and abduction. Operative treatment of stage II deformity has changed significantly over the past few decades. Joint sparing procedures which aim to realign the hindfoot and augment the diseased tibialis posterior tendon with the flexor digitorum longus transfer are commonly performed. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been associated with smaller incisions, less blood loss, and quicker recovery times. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively observe the tendinous and neurovascular structures at risk with MIS AAFD osteotomy procedures in cadaveric feet.Methods:MIS technique was used to perform medial displacement calcaneal, Evans, and Cotton osteotomies on nine cadaveric feet under fluoroscopic guidance. The sural nerve, superficial peroneal nerve and its branches, deep peroneal nerve, dorsalis pedis artery, saphenous vein, and peroneal and extensor hallucis longus tendons were carefully dissected from each cadaveric foot and evaluated for injuries following the MIS osteotomy cuts. The distance from the osteotomy cuts and these anatomic structures were measured and recorded.Results:On average, the sural nerve was 8.4 mm and 9 mm from the calcaneal and Evans osteotomy sites, respectively. The intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve was on average 68.3 mm and 41.1 mm from the calcaneal and Evans osteotomy sites, respectively. The peroneal tendons were on average 16.7 mm and 0 mm from the calcaneal and Evans osteotomy sites, respectively. The extensor hallucis was an average of 1 mm from the Cotton osteotomy site. There was a partial tear injury to the peroneus brevis in four of the cadaveric specimens at the Evans osteotomy site without complete laceration. There was no injury to the sural nerve, superficial peroneal nerve and its branches, saphenous vein, deep peroneal nerve, dorsalis pedis artery, or extensor hallucis longus tendon.Conclusion:Tendinous and neurovascular structures are at risk with MIS AAFD osteotomy procedures. Care should be taken with soft tissue handling and blunt dissection to decrease iatrogenic injuries to these structures. Specifically, extra care and recognition of the peroneal tendons during the Evans osteotomy may prevent damage, as this structure was at greatest risk among the three osteotomy cuts. Future research studies evaluating this technique and the functional outcomes in patients in a clinical setting is warranted. Surgical technique studies are underway to implement smaller, yet appropriate bone grafts through mini incisions.

Fusion Versus Joint-Sparing Reconstruction for Patients With Flexible Flatfoot.

Passively correctible, adult-acquired flatfoot deformities (AAFD) are treated with joint-sparing procedures. Questions remain as to the efficacy of such procedures when clinical deformities are severe. In severe deformities, a primary fusion may lead to predictable outcomes, but risks nonunion. We evaluated pre- and postsurgical flexible AAFD patients undergoing joint-sparing or fusion procedures, comparing reoperation and complication rates. We identified patients with flexible AAFD between January 1, 2001 and 2016. Exclusion criteria were incomplete medical record, rigid AAFD, and prior flatfoot surgery. Patient demographics, pre- and postsurgical radiographic measurements, surgery performed, and postoperative complications were evaluated by bivariate analysis, comparing joint-sparing versus fusion procedures. Of 239 patients (255 feet) (mean follow-up 62 ± 50 months), 209 (87%) underwent joint-sparing reconstructions, 30 (12.6%) underwent fusions. Fifty-four (24.1%) feet underwent joint-sparing reconstruction with reoperation versus 11 (35.5%) in fusion patients (P = .17). Radiographic improvement in talonavicular angle, talar first-metatarsal (anteroposterior view), and Meary's angle was higher in fusion patients (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .003, respectively). More nonunion reoperations among fusion patients were offset by reoperations in joint-sparing patients. Fusion uniquely corrected Meary's angle. Nonunion is of less concern for joint-sparing versus fusion for patients with severe flexible AAFD. Degree of deformity versus advantage of joint motion should improve decision making. Level IV: Retrospective case series.

Osteoarthritis of the ankle

Ankle arthritis is a debilitating condition. Primary ankle joint osteoarthritis is much rarer than hip or knee arthritis. The majority of cases are post-traumatic secondary to previous articular trauma or ligamentous instability. Treatment methods available are guided by disease severity and the patient's functional demands. Weight loss, activity modification, the wearing of an ankle brace or high-topped lace-up boots and orthoses should be the first line of treatment. Joint-sparing procedures such as arthroscopic debridement, supramalleolar osteotomy and distraction arthroplasty have been trialled with low levels of supporting evidence. The demand for joint preservation has led to the development of total ankle allografting procedures, but these have fallen out of favour. Despite advancements, the gold standard for end-stage arthritis remains arthrodesis, although evidence for total ankle arthroplasty in certain groups of patients is increasing. The current third-generation implants have improved survivorship although their results remain inferior to arthroplasty of the hip and knee. There is currently a UK randomized control trial of ankle replacement versus arthrodesis under way as well as several national joint registries, which will hopefully better define those patients who will gain most benefit from replacement as opposed to fusion.

Limb salvage surgery with joint preservation for malignant humeral bone tumors: operative procedures and clinical application

BackgroundHowever, the application of limb salvage with joint preservation is controversial. The purpose of this study is to propose a selection strategy of joint-sparing operative procedures for humeral malignancies based on tumor origin, site and bone strength.MethodsThe medical data of 28 patients with humeral malignancies treated at our institute from January 2010 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients had a median age of 51 years (range, 8–82 years). Bone strength scoring system was utilized to evaluated bone strength of the tumor. Four joint-sparing surgical methods were performed on selected patients. Evaluation of limb function was based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system. Two-sample t-test was used to compare patient group data such as bone strength score and postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score.ResultsThe mean follow-up period for the 7 patients with primary malignancies was 45 months (range, 15–66 months). One patient died due to recurrence and lung metastasis, while the remaining 6 patients (6/7, 85.7%) survived without recurrence. For the 21 patients with metastases, 5 survived with tumors, with an average survival time of 25.8 months (range, 9–48 months). The rest died from progression of the primary tumors. The mean bone strength score for the biological reconstruction group and non-biological reconstruction group was respectively 9.7 ± 1.3 and 12.9 ± 1.2. A significant difference between the 2 groups (p < 0.05) was found. Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was respectively 27.2 ± 1.8 and 26.1 ± 1.7 for the 2 groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Non-oncological complications included fracture (1), aseptic loosening (1) and radial nerve injury (1).ConclusionsAlcohol devitalized autograft replantation is applicable for diaphyseal humeral primary malignancies, with a good response to chemotherapy and a low bone strength score (≤10). In situ microwave ablation is suitable for diaphyseal and (or) metaphyseal low-grade malignant bone tumors or metastases with a low bone strength score (≤10). Intercalary prosthetic reconstruction is preferred for diaphyseal metastases with a high bone strength score (> 10).

Rheumatism operations in a state of flux-"Foot"

Surgical management of rheumatic feet has dramatically changed over the last decades influenced by the development of new pharmacological drugs and tissue-preserving surgical procedures. It has switched from joint resection to joint-sparing procedures as the method of choice. Nevertheless, the surgical interventions commonly used for non-rheumatic patients cannot be applied to rheumatic patients without reflection: in addition to the basic treatment, comorbidities, degree of mobilization of the patient, orthopedic shoe engineering and orthotic treatment play amajor role. Due to the decreasing incidence of the classical rheumatic foot, it has become even more important for physicians, physiotherapists and ergotherapists to recognize the development of such a disease as early as possible and immediately start the appropriate treatment.

Fusion Versus Flexible Reconstruction for Patients with Flexible Flatfoot

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: When passively correctible, adult acquired flatfoot deformities (AAFD) are often treated with joint-sparing procedures. Questions remain, however, as to the efficacy of such flexible procedures when clinical deformities become more severe. In patients with increasingly severe deformities, a primary fusion may lead to more predictable outcomes, but also risks nonunion. The primary aim of this study was to compare the reoperation rates and complication rates following flexible reconstructions versus fusion procedures in the treatment of flexible AAFD. Methods: All patients, who were diagnosed and treated surgically for a flexible AAFD between January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2016, were identified. Exclusion criteria included incomplete medical records, rigid flatfoot deformities, and prior flatfoot surgery. Procedures defined as flexible reconstructions included medial calcaneal osteotomy (MCO), lateral calcaneal lengthening (LCL), double osteotomy, posterior tibial tendon (PTT) debridement, or PTT augmentation; procedures defined as fusions included subtalar (ST) arthrodesis, talonavicular (TN) arthrodesis, calcaneocuboid (CCJ) arthrodesis (alone or in combination with a LCL), double arthrodesis, or triple arthrodesis. Patient demographics, type of surgical procedure, postoperative complications, and reoperation rates were collected. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare patients who had a flexible reconstruction procedure versus a fusion procedure. Results: Two-hundred-thirty-nine patients (255 feet, mean follow up 62±50 months, range 15-104) were included. Two-hundred-eight (87%) patients underwent a flexible reconstruction, average age 55 (±12.0), while 31 (13%) patients underwent a fusion, average age 58 (±14.4) (p = 0.161). Age, BMI, diabetes and neuropathy rates were similar for both groups. Fifty-four patients (24%) underwent a flexible reconstruction and returned to the OR versus 11 (34%) in the fusion group (p = 0.217). Nonunion occurred more in the fusion group, with 5 (16%) versus 10 (4%) nonunions in the flexible reconstruction (p = 0.027). Symptomatic nonunion rates were similar. Rates of surgical revision for nonunion among patients returning to the OR were similar between flexible (7/54, 3%) and fusion (3/11, 9%) groups (p = 0.117). Conclusion: No significant difference in reoperation rates was found between flexible AAFD patients who were treated with flexible reconstructions versus fusions. As expected, the nonunion rate was significantly higher in the fusion group. Notably, rates of revision surgery for nonunion were similar between groups. Our findings suggest that nonunion should be less of a concern when considering a flexible versus fusion procedure for patients with a severe AAFD, and that other factors such as the degree of deformity should guide decision making.