Joint Line Research Articles

C0-C1 joint injection: Anatomical, clinical and technical review

BackgroundCervicogenic headaches (CGH) are proven clinical entities. The prevalence of CGH arising from the atlanto-occipital (AO) joint is unknown. The best evidence for treatment of CGH is for third occipital nerve radiofrequency neurotomy. Treatment of CGH includes intra-articular injections into upper cervical spine joints. ObjectiveTo perform a review of the anatomy and clinical presentation of AO joint (AOJ) pain referral as well as a technical description to safely access the AOJ. MethodsA literature review was performed to explore the intricacies of the cranio-cervical junction (CCJ) with a focus on the relation between the AOJ and vascular anatomy. Our technical approach is described with complementary images. ResultsThe AOJ lies anterior to a venous sinus and slightly superior to the horizontally oriented vertebral artery crossing the joint line. ConclusionThe authors propose a modified superior needle trajectory that seeks to avoid these vascular structures and to access the AOJ safely.

Impact of Aging and Knee Osteoarthritis on Lower Limb Alignment and CPAK Classification: Gender Differences in a Japanese Cohort.

Objective: This study investigates the impact of age and knee osteoarthritis (OA) on the coronal plane alignment of the lower extremity in Japanese males and females, utilizing the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification system. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 150 male and 150 female patients. Participants were divided into three groups according to age and OA progression. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured using standard digital long-leg radiographs. Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) were calculated, and the CPAK classification was performed to verify the distribution among the three groups. Results: The results showed increased varus alignment of the mean mLDFA correlated with OA in both genders and with aging in males. The mean mMPTA did not change in males but shifted toward varus in females with both aging and OA. Both genders demonstrated a constitutional varus alignment with the progression of osteoarthritis (males: 1.3 ± 2.4° to -3.5 ± 3.7°, p < 0.001; females: -1.2 ± 3.2° to -3.6 ± 2.9°, p < 0.001). However, this trend with aging was observed only in females (0.0 ± 2.5° to -1.2 ± 3.2°, p = 0.018). JLO maintained its apex distal position with aging and OA progression in all subjects. The study further revealed a notable transition from CPAK Type II to Type I with OA progression in both genders, additionally influenced by aging in females. Conclusions: Aging affects coronal alignment and CPAK classification differently across genders. With OA progression, there was a shift toward smaller aHKA, while JLO remained unchanged. Compared to other races, young Japanese people exhibit similar CPAK distributions, but distinct differences appear in OA-affected individuals, highlighting potential racial variations in CPAK classifications.

Medial Joint Opening in the Operated Knee After Unilateral High Tibial Osteotomy: Risk of Osteoarthritis and Future Surgery in the Operated and Nonoperated Knee.

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) modifies the mechanics of the affected knee but can also affect the nonoperated knee. However, no research has reported on the prognosis and risk factors related to the nonoperated knee after unilateral HTO. To assess the radiological parameters associated with osteoarthritis (OA) progression and the need for surgery in the nonoperated knee after unilateral HTO, with concurrent assessment of the operated knee. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. The medical charts of 197 patients with knee OA who underwent unilateral HTO between March 2007 and December 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Radiological parameters such as the Kellgren-Lawrence grade, weightbearing line ratio, joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and joint line obliquity angle were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The mean follow-up length for the 197 patients was 5.9 ± 3.2 years for the operated knee and 5.5 ± 3.2 years for the nonoperated knee. A smaller postoperative JLCA in the operated knee was a significant risk factor for OA progression (P = .027) and undergoing surgery (P = .006) in the nonoperated knee. Conversely, a larger postoperative JLCA in the operated knee was a significant risk factor for OA progression (P = .014) and conversion to arthroplasty (P = .027) in the operated knee. A postoperative JLCA >1.5° (P < .001) and <3.9° (P < .001) was needed to reduce the risk of undergoing surgery in the nonoperated knee and OA progression in the operated knee, respectively. Additionally, a pre- to postoperative change in the JLCA (ΔJLCA) between -5.6° and -1.7° (P = .021 and P = .004, respectively) was needed to reduce the risk of OA progression in both knees. A large medial joint opening (a small postoperative JLCA) in the operated knee after unilateral HTO was associated with a higher risk of OA progression and surgery in the nonoperated knee. Conversely, a small medial joint opening (a large postoperative JLCA) was associated with a higher risk of OA progression and conversion to arthroplasty in the operated knee. For a balanced medial joint opening, if the postoperative JLCA was between 1.5° and 3.9° or the ΔJLCA was between -5.6° and -1.7°, a favorable prognosis in both knees could be anticipated.

Windswept deformity of the knee: prevalence and predictive factors in osteoarthritic and healthy populations.

This study examined windswept deformity (WSD) of the knee, comparing prevalence and contributing factors in healthy and osteoarthritic (OA) cohorts. A case-control radiological study was undertaken comparing 500 healthy knees (250 adults) with a consecutive sample of 710 OA knees (355 adults) undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were determined for each knee, and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity, and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types were calculated. WSD was defined as a varus mHKA of < -2° in one limb and a valgus mHKA of > 2° in the contralateral limb. The primary outcome was the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between healthy and OA groups. Secondary outcomes were the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between constitutional varus and valgus CPAK types, and to explore associations between predefined variables and WSD within the OA group. WSD was more prevalent in the OA group compared to the healthy group (7.9% vs 0.4%; p < 0.001, relative risk (RR) 19.8). There was a significant difference in means and variance between the mHKA of the healthy and OA groups (mean -1.3° (SD 2.3°) vs mean -3.8°(SD 6.6°) respectively; p < 0.001). No significant differences existed in MPTA and LDFA between the groups, with a minimal difference in aHKA (mean -0.9° healthy vs -0.5° OA; p < 0.001). Backwards logistic regression identified meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy as predictors of WSD (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 10.0), p = 0.002; OR 11.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 89.3); p = 0.016; OR 41.6 (95% CI 5.4 to 432.9), p ≤ 0.001, respectively). This study found a 20-fold greater prevalence of WSD in OA populations. The development of WSD is associated with meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy. These findings support WSD being mostly an acquired condition following skeletal maturity.

Offset-stoichiometric reflowable composite bonding method with adhesive for mitigating strict faying surface tolerances

Inherent susceptibility of adhesive bonds to miniscule quantities of contamination can cause undetectable weakened bonds. For this reason, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) places strict regulations on adhesively bonded joints in primary aircraft structures. To meet certification requirements aircraft manufactures resort to redundant load paths in the form of fasteners which inherently add weight to the structure and increase manufacturing time. In prior work, a secondary bonding technique called AERoBOND was developed, which utilized off-stoichiometric epoxy-matrix resins to facilitate reflow and diffusion of the resin within the joint interface during a secondary bonding/cure process, thus achieving a bond similar to a co-cured joint. However, the AERoBOND process required tight spatial tolerances between the two parts being joined. This study examined the utilization of conventional adhesive with the AERoBOND method to act as a filler in the joint line, effectively reducing the need for tight tolerances on the joining parts and serving as a flexible alternative for existing manufacturing processes. Ultrasonic inspection, optical microscopy, and ASTM International standard tests were performed to analyze the joints for defects and to quantify the mode-I and mode-II interlaminar fracture toughness and short beam strength of the proposed methodology with varying manufacturing parameters. The comprehensive results indicate that the AERoBOND+ method with and without surface preparation performs comparably to co-cured and conventional, adhesively bonded joints when secondary cured in an autoclave with 791 kPa of pressure. As an example, the AERoBOND+ panel without surface preparation bonded with 791 kPa of pressure (referred to as AB+3 throughout paper) had a mode-I fracture toughness (GIc) of 0.643 kJ/m2 and a mode-II fracture toughness (GIIc) of 4.000 kJ/m2 in the non-precracked condition and 4.218 kJ/m2 in the precracked condition at the adhesive-to-prepreg interface. These results were 96 %, 142 %, and 217 %, respectively, of a co-cured baseline panel (referred to as C1 throughout paper).

The Distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification in a Sample of Spanish Southeast Osteoarthritic Population: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Background and Objectives: The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification is a pragmatic distribution of nine phenotypes for coronal knee alignment that can be used on healthy and arthritic knees. Our study aimed to describe the CPAK distributions in a Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population and compare them to other populations’ published alignment distributions. Method and Materials: Full-leg standing X-rays of the lower limb from 528 cases originating from the so-called Vega Alta del Segura (southeast of the Iberian Peninsula) were retrospectively analysed. We measured the mechanical hip–knee–ankle, lateral distal femoral, and medial proximal tibial angles. We calculated the arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle and the joint line obliquity to classify each case according to the criteria of the CPAK classification. Results: Based on the aHKA result, 59.1% of the cases were varus (less than −2°), 32.7% were neutral (0° ± 2°), and 8.2% were valgus (greater than +2°). Based on the JLO result, 56.7% of the cases had a distal apex (less than 177°), 39.9% had a neutral apex (180° ± 3°), and 3.4% had a proximal apex (greater than 183°). The most common CPAK distribution in our Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population was type I (30.7%), followed by type IV (25.9%), type II (21%), type V (11.2%), type III (5%), type VI (2.8%), type VII (2.4%), type VIII (0.6%), and type IX (0.4%). Conclusions: We described the distribution according to the CPAK classification in a sample of the osteoarthritic population from southeastern Spain. In our sample, more than 75% of the patients were classified as type I, II, and IV.

Gender, BMI, and Age-Related Variations in Lower Limb Alignment Parameters and CPAK Phenotypes in Chinese Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Research on the distribution of and the variation in coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) in the Chinese osteoarthritis population is limited. We aimed to establish the CPAK classification based on the characteristics of lower limb alignment in the Chinese osteoarthritis population. We also investigated variations in lower limb alignment parameters and CPAK phenotypes based on gender, body mass index (BMI), and age. A retrospective study was conducted on a total of 944 knees diagnosed with osteoarthritis in 479 patients from January 2017 to December 2023. A scatterplot was used to describe the distribution of the CPAK classification, and the differences in lower limb alignment parameters and the CPAK classification were compared across genders (male, female), ages (middle-aged/<65 years, elderly/≥65 years), and BMI categories (normal/<25 kg/m2, overweight and obese/≥25 kg/m2) using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. The average arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity (JLO) were -3.03° ± 5.69° and 174.45° ± 4.29°, respectively. There was a higher prevalence of constitutional varus alignment in males and the overweight or obese group, while constitutional valgus alignment was more common in females and the normal BMI group (p < 0.05). Additionally, females had a greater apex distal JLO than males (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in lower limb alignment parameters among different age groups (p > 0.05). Although there were variations in alignment parameters across different genders and BMI categories in the knee osteoarthritis population, the predominant CPAK classifications were type I (38.03%), followed by type II (20.02%) and type IV (17.06%). The most common CPAK types were I, II, and IV, and they were not influenced by gender, BMI, or age, indicating that the CPAK classification can reliably reflect constitutional alignment. A better understanding of native alignment variability can aid in providing patient-specific recommendations when considering orthopedic alignment strategies.

Medial Tibial Condylar Valgus Osteotomy improve clinical outcomes and effectively corrects significant Tibial varus deformities without compromising joint line obliquity or patellar heigh

BackgroundTibial condylar valgus osteotomy (TCVO), or Chiba osteotomy, is a recognized procedure for treating advanced knee osteoarthritis in middle-aged individuals. Although its effectiveness is established, limited literature exists on its outcomes for specific conditions such as post-traumatic deformities, Blount disease (BD), and Pagoda-like proximal tibia varus deformities. HypothesisWe hypothesized that TCVO could improve both clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with severe varus deformities, correcting lower-limb variances while preserving joint line obliquity (JLO) and patellar height in substantial varus deformities. Patients and methodsThis study included 33 patients who underwent TCVO, with etiologies including post-traumatic (26 patients, 78.8%), Blount disease (4 patients, 12.1%), and Pagoda deformities (3 patients, 9.1%). The average age was 32.5 years (standard deviation = 12.8 years). Techniques for deformity correction varied, including Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for 10 patients (30.3%) and locking plate fixation for 13 patients (39.4%). We assessed several radiological parameters such as hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), and proximal posterior tibial angle (PPTA). Patient-reported outcomes, including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and simple knee value (SKV), were recorded both pre-operatively and two years post-operatively. ResultsStatistically significant improvements were observed in clinical scores and alignment changes two years post-operatively, including increases in HKA (from 166.1 to 178.4, p < .0001) and MPTA (from 72.4 to 85.1, p < .0001), and a decrease in JLO (from 9.8 to 3.2, p < .0001). No significant changes were noted in JLCA, PPTA, and CDI, with the patellar height remaining stable post-operatively. The achieved corrections closely matched the pre-operative plans. ConclusionTCVO offers significant improvements in radiological and clinical parameters for patients with substantial tibial varus deformities, effectively maintaining JLO and patellar height. Optimal outcomes from TCVO are dependent on careful patient selection and precise execution of surgical techniques. Level of evidenceIII.

Preoperative Joint Line Convergence Angle as an Indicator of Clinical Outcomes and Accuracy of Alignment Correction After Double-Level Osteotomy.

The relationship between postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes after double-level osteotomy (DLO) has not been clarified. To examine the radiological and clinical outcomes after DLO and specifically evaluate the influence of the joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) on the accuracy of alignment correction and surgical outcomes. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Included were 74 knees in 51 patients (mean age, 61.0 years) who underwent DLO for varus osteoarthritic knees and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The target hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) for the intended limb alignment was set to 1° valgus. The lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, JLCA, and HKAA were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Outliers in alignment correction were defined as a deviation of ≥3° from the originally intended HKAA. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). In the data analysis, the influence of the radiological parameters on the postoperative outcomes was statistically assessed. Radiological and clinical evaluation at 2-year follow-up showed significant improvement from preoperative values (P < .001). The HKAA was corrected from 13.4°± 3.0° varus preoperatively to 0.5°± 2.8° varus at 2 years, indicating a slight undercorrection. Regarding clinical outcomes, significant pre- to postoperative improvement was found on the KOOS (from 185.0 ± 71.2 to 387.9 ± 70.5; P < .001). Overall, 22 of the 74 knees (29.7%) were deemed to be outliers at the 2-year follow-up (19 knees [25.7%] in undercorrection, 3 knees [4.1%] in overcorrection). Postoperative KOOS values were significantly worse in the outliers than in the nonoutliers (344.4 ± 77.7 vs 405.8 ± 59.3; P < .001), and both pre- and postoperative JLCA was significantly larger in the outlier group. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated a preoperative cutoff JLCA of 6.0° for predicting postoperative alignment outliers. A preoperative JLCA of ≥6° was found to be a significant prognostic factor affecting the radiological and clinical outcomes after DLO for varus osteoarthritic knees by compromising the accuracy of deformity correction, resulting in suboptimal postoperative alignment.

Alignment rod and gap measurement methods achieve comparable alignment correction in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for varus osteoarthritic knees.

To compare clinical and radiological outcomes of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) using two different alignment methods: the alignment rod (AR) versus the gap measurement (GM) method. The primary outcome was to report the surgical accuracy of coronal plane corrections in each method. Patients who underwent MOWHTO with either AR or GM method between 2014 and 2022 at a single institution, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, were included. The opening gap was gradually spread with an AR under fluoroscopic control in the AR group, whereas the osteotomy site was opened to the value of the measured gap distance in addition to the thickness of the bone saw in the GM group. Radiological assessment of geometric characteristics included hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and joint line convergence angle. Surgical accuracy, which is the deviation (Δ) between the intended and achieved correction, was compared between both methods. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores. A total of 110 patients (n = 110 knees) with a mean age of 54.1 ± 8.4 years were included in the study. Radiological parameters were significantly improved as reflected by HKA correction from 171.6° ± 2.0° to 181.1° ± 2.6° in the AR group and from 171.0° ± 2.3° to 181.1° ± 2.8° in the GM group at 2 years (Intergroup n.s). There was no significant intergroup difference for all radiological parameters and clinical outcomes. There was no intergroup difference in the surgical accuracy as evaluated by Δvalues and absolute Δvalues of both HKA and MPTA (n.s). Comparable correction accuracy was achieved in MOWHTO using either the AR or GM method. The GM method is simple and reliable in achieving the intended correction in MOWHTO. Ⅲ retrospective comparative study.

Pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.

The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification has been developed to predict individual variations in inherent knee alignment. The impact of preoperative and postoperative CPAK classification phenotype on the postoperative clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains elusive. This study aimed to examine the effect of postoperative CPAK classification phenotypes (I to IX), and their pre- to postoperative changes on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A questionnaire was administered to 340 patients (422 knees) who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) between September 2013 and June 2019. A total of 231 patients (284 knees) responded. The -Knee Society Score 2011 (KSS 2011), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 (KOOS-12), and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were used to assess clinical outcomes. Using preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior full-leg radiographs, the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) were calculated and classified based on the CPAK classification. To investigate the impact on PROMs, multivariable regression analyses using stepwise selection were conducted, considering factors such as age at surgery, time since surgery, BMI, sex, implant use, postoperative aHKA classification, JLO classification, and changes in aHKA and JLO classifications from preoperative to postoperative. The preoperative and postoperative CPAK classifications were predominantly phenotype I (155 knees; 55%) and phenotype V (73 knees; 26%), respectively. The change in the preoperative to postoperative aHKA classification was a significant negative predictive factor for KOOS-12 and FJS-12, while postoperative apex proximal JLO was a significant negative predictive factor for KSS 2011 and KOOS-12. In primary TKA for OA, preoperative and postoperative CPAK phenotypes were associated with PROMs. Alteration in varus/valgus alignment from preoperative to postoperative was recognized as a negative predictive factor for both KOOS-12 and FJS-12. Moreover, the postoperative apex proximal JLO was identified as a negative factor for KSS 2011 and KOOS-12. Determining the target alignment for each preoperative phenotype with reproducibility could improve PROMs.

UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL ALIGNMENT CORRECTION TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS? THE ROLE OF KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT. STATE OFF THE ART REVIEW

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is in many ways the ultimate kinematic operation as the express aim is to resurface the diseased side of the joint and restore pre-arthritic alignment and balance while maintaining integrity of both cruciate ligaments. An increasing body of knowledge relates the outcomes of UKA to pre-arthritic anatomy rather than an arbitrarily defined neutral. The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification provides a validated technique for calculating pre-arthritic limb alignment (the Arithmetic Hip-Knee-Ankle Ankle (aHKA)) and Joint Line Obliquity (JLO) and will enable a greater understanding of the interactions between pre-arthritic anatomy, choice of prosthetic position and outcomes. When pre-arthritic alignment is not taken into consideration a post-operative limb alignment of mild to moderate varus for medial UKA and moderate valgus for lateral UKA appears produces the best outcomes. When pre-arthritic anatomy is taken into account superior results have been reported with restoration of pre-arthritic limb alignment and joint line obliquity. Restriction boundaries have yet to be clearly defined for tibial component coronal and Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angles when applying this new paradigm, but existing evidence would suggest a 60 varus limit for the tibial coronal angle may be a reasonable starting point. Lateral UKA has inherent differences in terms of tibial component positioning and ligament balance targets. Mobile bearing UKA demands a three-dimensional understanding of the effect of implant position on bearing stability. Modification of technique is necessary to produce anatomic tibia component angles with equipment designed for mechanical alignment. Robotic technology allows accurate understanding of pre-arthritic anatomy, precise reproduction of patient specific virtual planning, equally precise manipulation of soft tissue balance and future research using these platforms likely to further clarify in terms of ideal patient specific component and limb alignment targets.

Joint line convergence angle should be considered when constitutional alignment is predicted based on arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study.

Few studies have illustrated the role of the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) in the correlation between the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA). We aimed to determine this role and to evaluate the effect of the JLCA in predicting constitutional alignment using the aHKA. A total of 107 normal participants (214 knees) and 246 patients (477 knees) with osteoarthritis(OA) were retrospectively examined using long-leg radiographs. The formula was calculated geometrically on plain radiographs of the knee based on the relationships among the mHKA, aHKA, and JLCA, and the distribution of the JLCA between the groups was determined. The effect of the JLCA on the prediction of constitutional alignment using the aHKA were evaluated. The geometric formula was determined to be 'mHKA=180°+aHKA - JLCA', and was verified. The median (quartile 1, quartile 3) JLCA was 2.0° (1.0°, 3.5°) and 2.5° (1.0°, 4.5°) in the normal and OA groups, respectively. The JLCA affected the prediction of constitutional alignment based on the aHKA. It should be considered when constitutional alignment is predicted based on the aHKA in patients with high JLCA values.

Efficiency assessment of intelligent patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundIn total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the practical use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been reported previously with both advantage and disadvantage. The application of artificial intelligent (AI) forces overwhelmingly development of medical industries, while the impact of AI on PSI efficiency remains unknown. Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficiency of Intelligent-PSI (i-PSI) in TKA, compared with the conventional instrumentation-TKA (CI).Methods102 late-stage OA patients who met inclusive criteria were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial and separated into two groups (i-PSI vs. CI). In both groups, an AI preoperative planning engine was applied for surgery decision making. In CI group, conventional instrumentation was applied for bony resection, while resection of i-PSI group was completed with i-PSI. A convolutional neural network was applied to automatically process computer tomography images and thus produced i-PSI. With the help of three-dimension printing, the workflow of production was largely simplified. AI-driven preoperative planning guided resection and alignment decisions. Resection measurement, perioperative radiography and perioperative clinical outcomes were analyzed to verify efficiency of i-PSI.ResultsIn resection outcomes, smaller deviation of lateral and medial distal femoral resection were found in i-PSI group than CI group (P = 0.032 and 0.035), while no difference was found in other resection planes. In radiography outcomes, postoperative coronal alignments of i-PSI group, including postoperative Hip–knee–ankle axis (HKA) (P = 0.025), postoperative HKA outliners (P = 0.042), Femoral coronal alignment (FCA) (P = 0.019) and Joint line convergence angle (JLCA) (P = 0.043) showed closer to neutral position than CI group. Moreover, Femoral sagittal alignment (FSA) of i-PSI group showed closer to neutral position than CI group(P = 0.005). No difference was found in other alignments. In clinical outcomes, i-PSI group seemed to cost more surgical time than CI group (P = 0.027), while others showed no differences between the two groups.ConclusionIntelligent Patient-specific Instrumentation in TKA achieved simplified production flow than conventional PSI, while also showed more accurate resection, improved synthesis position and limb alignment than conventional instrumentation. Above all, this study proved that i-PSI being an applicable and promising tool in TKA.

Adjusted planning based on the joint line convergence angle improves correction accuracy in the standing position after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

BackgroundPostoperative change of the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) is known to be a factor affecting correction error in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). The purpose of this study was to assess whether preoperative planning that considers change of the JLCA can achieve accurate correction in the standing position after OWHTO.MethodsOWHTO was performed for 109 knees with osteoarthritis of the knee. The amount of angular correction was planned aiming to achieve mechanical valgus of 5° in 55 knees (conventional planning), and it was adjusted in 54 knees (adjusted planning) according to the preoperative JLCA as follows: not changed with JLCA ≤ 3°; decreased 1° with JLCA 4–6°; decreased 2° with JLCA 7–8°; and decreased 3° with JLCA ≥ 9°. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, JLCA, and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on standing long-leg radiographs. Correction error ≤ 2º was defined as the acceptable range, and correction error > 2º was defined as an outlier.ResultsThe conventional planning group had a significantly greater postoperative HKA angle than the adjusted planning group (6.1º and 4.9º, respectively). The mean JLCA decreased from 4.8º to 2.6º in the conventional planning group and from 4.6º to 2.7º in the adjusted planning group. The conventional planning group had significantly greater postoperative MPTA than the adjusted planning group (96.2º and 94.7º, respectively). The rate of outliers with correction error > 2º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (9%) than in the conventional planning group (24%). The rate of the MPTA > 95º was significantly lower in the adjusted planning group (30%) than in the conventional planning group (69%).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that preoperative planning with adjustment of the correction angle according to the preoperative JLCA improved correction accuracy in the standing position after OWHTO.

No Radiographic Evidence of Medial Collateral Ligament Elongation in Valgus Osteoarthritic Knees Enables Treatment with Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty.

When performing caliper-verified kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) in the osteoarthritic (OA) knee with valgus deformity, an elongated medial collateral ligament (MCL) could result in a valgus setting of the tibial component. The present study analyzed KA TKA in patients with valgus deformities (i.e., tibiofemoral angle > 10 degrees of valgus) and determined (1) the occurrence of radiographic MCL elongation, (2) the incidence of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) release and the use of constrained components, and (3) whether the 1-year Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and Likert satisfaction score were comparable to KA TKAs for OA deformities ≤10 degrees of valgus. One hundred and two consecutive patients who underwent KA TKA by a single surgeon were analyzed radiographically and clinically at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Radiographic MCL elongation was identified by a greater than 1 degree of valgus orientation of the tibial component relative to the OA tibial joint line. Twenty-six patients had a radiographic anatomic tibiofemoral angle greater than 10 degrees of valgus (range of OA deformity: 11-23 degrees of valgus). Seventy-six had an OA deformity ≤10 degrees of valgus (10-degree valgus to -14-degree varus). No patient had MCL elongation or a ligament release, or required constrained components. The median FJS of 78, OKS of 42, and KOOS JR of 76, and the 85% satisfaction rate of the patients with greater than 10 degrees of OA valgus deformity were not significantly different from those with ≤10 degrees of OA valgus deformity (p ≥ 0.17). Because MCL elongation was not detected in OA deformities up to 23 degrees of valgus, the risk of under-correcting the valgus deformity leading to instability and poor outcome scores is low when performing KA TKA using primary components without releasing the LCL and/or PCL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: IV.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of the First Metacarpal Axes in Healthy Individuals and Early-Stage Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Patients-Potential Implication on First Metacarpal Corrective Osteotomy.

Background: Numerous anatomical features of the first carpometacarpal (CMC I) joint have been investigated as potential predispositions for CMC I osteoarthritis (OA). Even though load transmission through the CMC I joint-and, therefore, the development of osteoarthritis-is believed to be influenced by the geometry of the first metacarpal (MC I) bone, there is no common definition of the MC I axes. Methods: CT scans of twenty healthy volunteers and pre- and postoperative CT scans of six patients with CMC I OA undergoing Wilson osteotomy were analyzed. We proposed a calculation method based on anatomical landmarks for the proximal joint surface axis (PA) angle and the definition of an anatomical (AA) and a mechanical (MA) longitudinal axis. We hypothesized that for an MC I extension osteotomy to be effective, the AA and MA need to be aligned surgically. Results: To align AA and MA, an average correction angle of 22.60° (SD 2.53°) at 1 cm and 26.73° (SD 2.55°) at 1.5 cm distal to the CMC I joint line is required. Conclusions: The hereby proposed method for patient-specific calculation of the correction can be used to improve the surgical technique.

Femoral and tibial phenotypes of varus alignment in a Southeast Asian arthritic population: a descriptive study.

Knowledge of femoral and tibial morphology is important for patient-specific surgery in both joint reconstruction and preservation procedures. Studies evaluating morphological variance in femoral and tibial alignments in Asian populations are scarce. This is the first descriptive study evaluating the femoral and tibial phenotypes of varus alignment in a Southeast Asian population. Long-leg coronal standing radiographs of 2021 limbs were obtained, and the hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle and joint line convergence angle were measured. Joint line obliquity was calculated, and the knees were classified according to the Coronal Plane Alignment of Knee (CPAK) classification. Descriptive analyses on alignment parameters and demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity and body mass index [BMI]) were performed and entered into a linear regression model. The highest frequency of limb alignment in the population was found to be CPAK type I (52.71%, n = 1003). Tibial varus was the largest contributor of varus malignment. Of the varus knees (n = 1247), varus deformity was found solely in the tibia (68.60%), solely in the femur (2.07%) and was contributed by both the femur and the tibia (4.97%). In the linear regression model, BMI was found to be a strong determinant for femoral varus (P = 0.004) and joint line incongruence (P < 0.001). The findings of this study will be important to surgeons during planning for joint preservation procedures (such as corrective osteotomies) and joint arthroplasties to restore alignment.

Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcomes of Metaphyseal Sleeves for Addressing Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type 2 and 3 Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (RTKA) is a complex procedure challenged by significant bone loss, necessitating effective restoration techniques. This study investigates the clinical outcomes and complications of metaphyseal sleeves in RTKA with severe metaphyseal bone loss, aiming to evaluate their efficacy over a minimum four-year follow-up. Methods This was a retrospective observational study on 29 patients who underwent RTKA with Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type II or III bone defects using porous coated tibial and/or femoral metaphyseal sleeves from December 2016 and January 2019. Data collection included demographic information, etiology for revision, and functional outcomes assessed by the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. Results The cohort comprised patients with a mean age of 62.6 years (SD=7.8), predominantly female (N=21, 71.4%). The primary indication for RTKA was aseptic loosening (N=18, 62.1%) followed by Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI). Significant improvements were noted in the range of motion. Both KSS (Pre-op:57.97 vs. Post-op:73.59) and OKS (Pre-op:15.86 vs. Post-op:30.66) showed highly significant improvement (p<0.0001). Radiographic assessments indicated stable component position and signs of osseous integration without any osteolysis. No sleeve-related complications were observed. Survival analysis demonstrated a high cumulative survival probability over the study period. Conclusion Metaphyseal sleeves offer a viable solution for managing severe bone loss in RTKA, providing stable fixation, restoring joint line kinematics, and facilitating stress distribution to the metaphyseal region. This study corroborates the effectiveness of metaphyseal sleeves in challenging revision scenarios, aligning with previous research.

Hypermobile Anterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: A Retrospective Case-Series Study of Presentation, Imaging, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Hypermobility of the lateral meniscus is typically associated with the posterior part of this structure, with occurrences in the anterior part rarely reported. However, a hypermobile anterior horn of the lateral meniscus can manifest clinical symptoms. This study aimed to increase awareness regarding hypermobility in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus by presenting its clinical presentations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, arthroscopic findings, treatment approaches, postoperative protocols, and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case-series involving patients diagnosed as having hypermobile anterior horn of the lateral meniscus through arthroscopy. The clinical presentations, preoperative image findings, arthroscopic findings, treatments, postoperative protocols, and clinical outcomes following meniscal stabilization were all reviewed. Results: A total of 17 patients (17 knees) with a mean age of 45.9 ± 18.4 years were analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 18.2 ± 7.6 months (range, 6-24 months). Primary symptoms included anterior lateral knee pain, tenderness in the lateral joint lines, and a locking sensation in six of the knees. MRI revealed hypodense lesions anterior to the meniscus, fluid accumulation, degenerative changes, and anterior horn deformities. Following meniscal stabilization, the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score increased from 65.8 ± 12.7 before surgery to 91.1 ± 9.6 at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). All the analyzed knees achieved a full range of motion by the final follow-up, with no patient experiencing any complication or requiring reoperation. Conclusions: There is no specific sign or test that can be used to detect a hypermobile anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. A thorough arthroscopic examination is essential for diagnosing hypermobility in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Arthroscopic meniscal stabilization yields favorable outcomes.