Joint Fusion Research Articles

Location of Vascular Structures at Risk in Relation to Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Objective: This study seeks to establish the normal distribution of the vasculature surrounding the SI joint while also demonstrating associations between distribution and laterality, sex, and ethnicity. Summary of Background Data: Sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion surgery has emerged as a viable treatment option for patients suffering from low back pain due to chronic SI joint dysfunction. Due to potential complications from iatrogenic injury to vasculature, it becomes critical to understand normal anatomy and locations with a high vasculature concentration surrounding the SI joint. Methods: The authors retrieved medical and radiographic records of patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the pelvis. Anterior and posterior compartments of the SI joint were established on the transverse view by creating an even coronal division of the SI joint. The superior, middle, and inferior compartments were established on the coronal view as three equal transverse compartments. The compartments in which vasculature was visualized were recorded. Results: Distribution of vasculature around the right and left hemipelvis concentrated in the inferior compartments and decreased in concentration while moving superiorly. Anterior compartments contain a higher vascularity than posterior compartments. Vasculature was present in less than 3% of the posterior middle, and posterior superior compartments while present in more than 83% of the inferior compartments. There were no significant differences with respect to vascular distribution when comparing the laterality of the right versus left hemipelvis. There were statistically significant relationships between vascular distribution and sex (P<0.05), as well as across self-reported ethnicity (P<0.05). Conclusion: SI screw placement in the posterior superior has the lowest risk of iatrogenic vascular injury. Careful consideration should be taken during SI joint fusion surgery in the inferior compartments due to its high vasculature density.

Outcomes of naviculocuneiform arthrodesis with and without adjunct arthrodesis

Naviculocuneiform (NC) arthrodesis is considered a challenging procedure compared to arthrodesis of other medial column joints and/or hindfoot fusions. The objectives of this study were to 1) report the incidence of nonunion and complications after NC arthrodesis with or without adjunct joint arthrodesis, and 2) report incidences in which a fixation method was used and report how many cuneiform joints were fused. A retrospective review of medical charts and radiographs were performed on patients from 1/2013 through 11/2023 at a single institution in the Midwest region. 137 cases included and 90 (66%) adjunct joint arthrodesis incidents. The overall nonunion rate was 25% (34/137 cases) and overall revision rate was 15% (21/137 cases). The nonunion rate with adjunct joint arthrodesis was 26% (23/90 cases) and without was 23% (11/47 cases). The screws-alone fixation had the lowest nonunion rate of 20% (4/20 cases). The overall complication rate was 47% (65/137 cases), and the most common cause was hardware issues (31%, 43/137 cases). Fixating all three joints regardless of fixation constructs resulted in 18% (5/28 cases) nonunion. Crossed screws with medial plate fixation when fixated medial and middle cuneiform joints had the highest nonunion rates (24%, 10/42 cases) while fixation with screws and staples had the lowest nonunion rates (11%, 1/9 cases). In conclusion, the choice of fixation technique and number of cuneiform joints fused could affect the success of NC arthrodesis. Implementing proper cuneiform joints fusion and recognizing the limitations of fixation techniques potentially reduces the risk of nonunion and complications.

AVALIAÇÃO DA TÉCNICA DE ARTRORRISE SUBTALAR NO TRATAMENTO DO PÉ PLANO VALGO FLEXÍVEL PEDIÁTRICO: UMA REVISÃO DE LITERATURA

Introduction: Flexible flatfoot is characterized by loss of the medial longitudinal arch and subtalar eversion and is a prevalent orthopedic condition among pediatric patients. Subtalar arthroereisis has emerged as an effective surgical option for the correction of this deformity, without the need for fusion of the subtalar joint or osteotomies. The aim of this study is analyze the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of subtalar arthroereisis in the treatment of flexible pediatric flatfoot. Methodology: This is an extended literature review study through bibliographic research using the terms subtalar, arthroereisis, and flexible flatfoot. The inclusion criteria included original articles published in the last 10 years. Results: Seven articles were selected to compose the review database. The studies addressed skeletally immature patients and evaluated the results of subtalar arthroereisis. Based on our articles, the results demonstrate a significant reduction in pain and adequate correction of deformities, regardless of the type of implant used – be it absorbable or non-absorbable. The procedure has a relatively low complication profile, which reinforces its reliability as a viable alternative for pediatric patients. The most common complications, such as implant loosening, incomplete correction, tarsal bone pain and screw breakage, were observed in a minority of cases. Conclusion: Subtalar arthroereisis presents an effective and safe surgical option for the treatment of flexible flatfoot foot in children.

Impact of metadata in multimodal classification of bone tumours

The accurate classification of bone tumours is crucial for guiding clinical decisions regarding treatment and follow-up. However, differentiating between various tumour types is challenging due to the rarity of certain entities, high intra-class variability, and limited training data in clinical practice. This study proposes a multimodal deep learning model that integrates clinical metadata and X-ray imaging to improve the classification of primary bone tumours. The dataset comprises 1,785 radiographs from 804 patients collected between 2000 and 2020, including metadata such as age, affected bone site, tumour position, and gender. Ten tumour types were selected, with histopathology or tumour board decisions serving as the reference standard.MethodsOur model is based on the NesT image classification model and a multilayer perceptron with a joint fusion architecture. Descriptive statistics included incidence and percentage ratios for discrete parameters, and mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range for continuous parameters.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 33.62 ± 18.60 years, with 54.73% being male. Our multimodal deep learning model achieved 69.7% accuracy in classifying primary bone tumours, outperforming the Vision Transformer model by five percentage points. SHAP values indicated that age had the most substantial influence among the considered metadata.ConclusionThe joint fusion approach developed in this study, integrating clinical metadata and imaging data, outperformed state-of-the-art models in classifying primary bone tumours. The use of SHAP values provided insights into the impact of different metadata on the model’s performance, highlighting the significant role of age. This approach has potential implications for improving diagnostic accuracy and understanding the influence of clinical factors in tumour classification.

Comparison of deep-learning multimodality data fusion strategies in mandibular osteoradionecrosis NTCP modelling using clinical variables and radiation dose distribution volumes

Objective.Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling is rapidly embracing deep learning (DL) methods, acknowledging the importance of spatial dose information. Finding effective ways to combine information from radiation dose distribution maps (dosiomics) and clinical data involves technical challenges and requires domain knowledge. We propose different multi-modality data fusion strategies to facilitate future DL-based NTCP studies.Approach.Early, joint and late DL multi-modality fusion strategies were compared using clinical and mandibular radiation dose distribution volumes. These were contrasted with single-modality models: a random forest trained on non-image data (clinical, demographic and dose-volume metrics) and a 3D DenseNet-40 trained on image data (mandibular dose distribution maps). The study involved a matched cohort of 92 osteoradionecrosis cases and 92 controls from a single institution.Main results.The late fusion model exhibited superior discrimination and calibration performance, while the join fusion achieved a more balanced distribution of the predicted probabilities. Discrimination performance did not significantly differ between strategies. Late fusion, though less technically complex, lacks crucial inter-modality interactions for NTCP modelling. In contrast, joint fusion, despite its complexity, resulted in a single network training process which included intra- and inter-modality interactions in its model parameter optimisation.Significance.This study is a pioneering effort in comparing different strategies for including image data into DL-based NTCP models in combination with lower dimensional data such as clinical variables. The discrimination performance of such multi-modality NTCP models and the choice of fusion strategy will depend on the distribution and quality of both types of data. Multiple data fusion strategies should be compared and reported in multi-modality NTCP modelling using DL.

Efficacy comparison of robot-assisted versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases

Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RA MIS-TLIF) and fluoroscopy-assisted MIS-TLIF (FA MIS-TLIF) in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases. Methods: The clinical data of 114 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent MIS-TLIF in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2019 to March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-eight patients underwent RA MIS-TLIF (robot group) and 56 patients received FA MIS-TLIF (freehand group). There were 16 males and 42 females in the robot group, with a mean age of (56.7±8.1) years. And there were 19 males and 37 females in the freehand group, with a mean age of (57.2±8.6) years. The clinical outcome parameters were the visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, operative time, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and complications. The radiographic change measures were the accuracy of screw placement, facet joint violation (FJV), fusion status, and change in disc height at the proximal adjacent segment. All the patients were followed-up for 2-5 years. Results: There was no significant differences in the VAS and ODI scores, blood loss, or postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (all P>0.05). The operative time was longer in robot group than freehand group [(158.5±12.1) min vs (146.4±15.4) min, P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies for patients between robot group and freehand group (P>0.05). The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies for the surgeon was significantly lower in robot group than freehand group (13.8±3.9 vs 74.7±6.8, P<0.001). The rate of a perfect screw position (grade A) was higher in robot group than freehand group [87.5%(203/232) vs 70.1%(157/224), P<0.001]. However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grades A and B) between the two groups [98.3%(228/232) vs 96.9%(217/224), P=0.330]. The FJV grade was significantly higher in freehand group than robot group (0.43±0.68 vs 0.13±0.43, P<0.001). During at 2-year postoperative follow-up, there was no significant difference in the fusion status between the two groups (P>0.05); however, the decrease in disc height at the proximal adjacent segment was significantly less in robot group than freehand group [(0.63±0.38) mm vs (0.92±0.35) mm, P=0.001]. In the robotic group, a pedicle screw penetrated the outer wall of the vertebral pedicle in one patient, which was adjusted during surgery. In the freehand group, two screws were inserted too deeply and penetrated the anterior cortex, resulting in mild abdominal discomfort postoperatively, which resolved by the third day after surgery. Conclusions: Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement is a safer and more accurate alternative to conventional freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in MIS-TLIF. Compared with freehand MIS-TLIF, robot-assisted MIS-TLIF increases the operation time, but the accuracy of screw placement is higher, and the intraoperative radiation dose and the degree of adjacent segment degeneration are reduced.

Ilizarov fixator as salvage procedure after frustrating arthrodesis using intramedullary nailing - is there a chance of consolidation?

Arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints is a salvage procedure that has been used successfully for years. Treatment options include internal procedures and external procedures. Retrograde intramedullary nailing is considered a safe procedure with a high degree of stability and comfort. Nevertheless, there are cases in which this internal arthrodesis fails and another procedure must be considered. Ilizarov fixator treatment could be a solution for those patients in whom intramedullary nailing has failed. Even if it means another surgical revision - is it possible to finally achieve consolidation with this method? In this single-center, retrospective study all documents of patients who underwent tibiotalar and subtalar joints fusion using the Ilizarov external fixator at our institution from 2003 to 2023 as secondary treatment after frustrated first arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail were reviewed. Nineteen patients (17 men and 2 women), with an average age of 55.7 (standard deviation (SD) 8.7, range 34-75) years were included. On average, 1.7 (SD 1.3, range 1-6) arthrodesis attempt were performed before final Ilizarov fixator arthrodesis. The average time spent in the Ilizarov fixator was 19 (SD 4, range 14-29) weeks. In seven cases (36.8%), both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints received bony consolidation in the end. If patients have undergone fusion of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints with a retrograde nail and this fails, it is difficult to achieve complete consolidation in the further course. A further attempt at arthrodesis using an Ilizarov fixator is possible, but the overall results are also poor. This procedure must therefore be seen as a last resort before amputation.

Text-image multimodal fusion model for enhanced fake news detection.

In the era of rapid internet expansion and technological progress, discerning real from fake news poses a growing challenge, exposing users to potential misinformation. The existing literature primarily focuses on analyzing individual features in fake news, overlooking multimodal feature fusion recognition. Compared to single-modal approaches, multimodal fusion allows for a more comprehensive and enriched capture of information from different data modalities (such as text and images), thereby improving the performance and effectiveness of the model. This study proposes a model using multimodal fusion to identify fake news, aiming to curb misinformation. The framework integrates textual and visual information, using early fusion, joint fusion and late fusion strategies to combine them. The proposed framework processes textual and visual information through data cleaning and feature extraction before classification. Fake news classification is accomplished through a model, achieving accuracy of 85% and 90% in the Gossipcop and Fakeddit datasets, with F1-scores of 90% and 88%, showcasing its performance. The study presents outcomes across different training periods, demonstrating the effectiveness of multimodal fusion in combining text and image recognition for combating fake news. This research contributes significantly to addressing the critical issue of misinformation, emphasizing a comprehensive approach for detection accuracy enhancement.

ID: 338075 Improvement in Gait Abnormality following Minimally Invasive, Posterior Approach Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

ID: 338075 Improvement in Gait Abnormality following Minimally Invasive, Posterior Approach Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

Comparison of a Novel Posterior Integrated Transfixation Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Approach to the Posterolateral and Lateral Approaches: A Cadaveric Biomechanical and Computational Analysis of the Fixation, Invasiveness, and Fusion Area.

To concurrently assess and compare the fixation efficacy, invasiveness, and fusion potential of a posterior integrated transfixation cage system to the posterolateral threaded implant and lateral triangular rod systems, in a cadaveric model. Twelve (12) cadaveric sacroiliac joint specimens were utilized and tested within the single-leg stance multidirectional pure moment bending model. Each specimen was tested in the intact, destabilized, treated (using posterior, posterolateral, and lateral systems), and post-fatigue conditions by applying 0 to ± 7.5 Nm of moment in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending while measuring the angular range of motion between the sacrum and ilium. Computational models were reconstructed from Computed Tomography (CT) scans and manufacturer surgical technique guides. The models were utilized to quantify the volume of bone removed during implantation and the surface area available for fusion. The posterior integrated transfixation cage system and the lateral triangular rods produced equivalent motion reduction in all motion planes (P > 0.583). The posterolateral cylindrical threaded implant produced less motion reductions than the posterior and lateral implants in flexion-extension (6% ± 3% vs 37% ± 10% and 33% ± 11%, respectively, P <0.05). The posterior system removed 22%-60% less bone volume from the sacrum and ilium (P<0.10), introduced 200%-270% more implant surface to the joint space (P<0.01) and decorticated 75%-375% more joint surface area (P<0.01). The posterior integrated transfixation single-implant cage system is superior to the posterolateral cylindrical threaded single-implant system. Its performance in osteopenic bone is equivalent to the lateral triangular rod system in healthy bone; however, the posterior integrated transfixation cage system requires a single implant, while the lateral triangular rod system requires three. The posterior implant removes the least bone volume and has the most surface area for fusion, providing a significantly better opportunity for robust sacroiliac joint arthrodesis.

Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants: 5-Year Follow-Up.

Prospective, multicenter, single arm study with 5-year follow up. To report long-term (5-year) safety, effectiveness, and radiographic outcomes after sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion (SIJF) with 3D-printed triangular titanium implants (TTI) and compare them with solid titanium plasma spray coated implants. A large literature base supports minimally invasive SIJF with TTI for chronic SIJ dysfunction. SIJF with TTI was performed in 51 subjects and scheduled follow-up occurred at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months. Postoperative visits included quality of life questionnaires and functional tests. A high-resolution CT scan was performed at either 6 or 12 months, and again at 60 months. All CT scans were interpreted by an independent musculoskeletal radiologist. 5-year follow-up was available in 36 of 51 subjects (71%). At 5 years, improvements in SI joint pain (58.1 points [0-100 scale]), SIJ-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], 25.4 points) and quality of life (EuroQOL 5D, 0.24 points, and EuroQOL visual analog scale, 13.4 points) were sustained and showed no signs of diminution. The percentage of patients using opioids for SIJ pain decreased markedly from baseline (57%) to 5 years (17%). Physical function tests showed persistent improvements from baseline. There was no evidence of device breakage, migration or subsidence and few late adverse events occurred attributable to the device. Independent analysis of CT scans showed bone opposed to implants in all cases, and evidence of bone bridging in 90% of cases, and no evidence of radiolucency or other adverse bone reactions. Prospective 5-year follow-up showed that SIJ fusion using 3D-printed TTI resulted in immediate, marked, and persistent improvements in pain and quality of life, with improved physical function, reduced opioid use, and a low rate of revision surgery. Radiographic evidence showed implant integration and joint fusion. Level II.

Effectiveness of intra-articular analgesia in reducing postoperative pain after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

During the first postoperative days following minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF), patients often report serious pain, which contributes to high utilization of painkillers and prevention of early mobilization. This prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine 0.50% versus placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in 42 patients in reducing postoperative pain after MISJF. The primary outcome was difference in pain between bupivacaine and placebo groups, assessed as fixed factor in a linear mixed model. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and length of hospital stay. We found that SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine did not affect postoperative pain scores in comparison with placebo, neither as group-effect (p = 0.68), nor dependent on time (group*time: p = 0.87). None of the secondary outcome parameters were affected in the postoperative period in comparison with placebo, including opioid consumption (p = 0.81). To conclude, intra-articular infiltration of the SIJ with bupivacaine at the end of MISJF surgery is not effective in reducing postoperative pain. Hence, we do not recommend routine use of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with analgesia in MISJF.

First Tarsometatarsal Alignment May Self-Correct After Triple Arthrodesis in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

Triple arthrodesis is commonly used to correct rigid progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). These patients often have associated first tarsometatarsal (TMT) instability on lateral weightbearing radiographs. It has not been well established if it is necessary to add first TMT arthrodesis to adequately correct the overall deformity. This study retrospectively examined pre- and postoperative radiographs of PCFD patients with first TMT instability that were managed by triple arthrodesis alone. All triple arthrodesis cases were searched for a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients with PCFD who underwent triple arthrodesis without first TMT joint fusion. Preoperative radiographs were examined for first TMT joint instability, demonstrated by plantar gapping of the first metatarsal-medial cuneiform angle or first metatarsal dorsal subluxation at the TMT joint. Measurement of sagittal first metatarsal-medial cuneiform angle and first metatarsal subluxation as described by King and Toolan was performed. Twenty patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Six patients did not demonstrate at least 30% improvement of one or both measurements of first TMT instability postoperatively and were considered failures. Fourteen patients demonstrated correction of their first TMT joint instability. Average follow-up was 5.0 (range, 1.8-9.4) years. The first metatarsal-medial cuneiform angle improved from 3.8 to 1.1 degrees (P < .05). The first metatarsal subluxation corrected from 4.1 to 1.5 mm (P < .05). One patient showed radiographic evidence of arthritis in the first TMT joint at final follow-up. Seventy percent of patients with PCFD with asymptomatic first TMT joint instability demonstrated correction of first TMT radiographic instability with isolated triple arthrodesis. This was maintained at 5-year mean follow-up. In cases of PCFD with medial column instability, triple arthrodesis alone may be adequate to restore overall alignment.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Posterior Atlantoaxial Lateral Mass Joint Fusion (MIS-PALF): A Muscle-Sparing Procedure for Atlantoaxial Instability or Dislocation.

Conventional surgical procedures for atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (AAI/D) have been associated with a high prevalence of postoperative occipitocervical pain and dysfunction, as well as substantial perioperative blood loss. We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion (MIS-PALF), a procedure that can largely avoid disruption of suboccipital musculature, would be superior to the standard Goel-Harms technique in terms of postoperative pain and perioperative blood loss. This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing MIS-PALF for AAI/D at Peking University Third Hospital's Department of Orthopaedics from January 2021 to December 2021 and a historical control group of patients with the same diagnoses who were treated with the Goel-Harms technique. The duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss, postoperative length of hospital stay, postoperative body temperature, pain, supplementary use of narcotics, spinal cord function/improvement (assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores), reduction of AAI/D (determined based on radiographic parameters), rate of successful fusion, and complication rate were all compared between the 2 groups. No significant differences were noted between the groups (43 MIS-PALF cases, 86 control cases) regarding baseline data, operative time, spinal cord function or improvement, reduction of AAI/D, rate of successful fusion, and complication rate. MIS-PALF was associated with significantly less perioperative blood loss, a shorter postoperative hospital stay (decreased by 30.8%), lower intensity and frequency of postoperative pain (decreased by 10.6% and 61.9%, respectively), less need for supplementary narcotics, and less frequent postoperative fever (decreased by 48.7%). This was the first prospective cohort study of which we are aware on minimally invasive procedures for atlantoaxial fusion. Clinical efficacy (AAI/D reduction, rate of successful atlantoaxial fusion, JOA score improvement), efficiency (operative time), and safety (complications) of MIS-PALF appeared to be noninferior to those of the Goel-Harms technique. MIS-PALF was superior in terms of postoperative occipitocervical pain and length of hospital stay, both of which directly affect overall patient satisfaction and postoperative recovery of quality of life. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion after Instrumented Spinal Fusion.

Retrospective Cohort Study. To identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion. Patients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion. 549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; P < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; P < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; P < 0.001). The highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.

Outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumour.

The ulna is an extremely rare location for primary bone tumours of the elbow in paediatrics. Although several reconstruction options are available, the optimal reconstruction method is still unknown due to the rarity of proximal ulna tumours. In this study, we report the outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumours. Medical profiles of 13 patients, who between March 2004 and November 2021 underwent osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction after the resection of the proximal ulna tumour, were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were measured clinically by the assessment of elbow range of motion (ROM), stability, and function, and radiologically by the assessment of allograft-host junction union, recurrence, and joint degeneration. The elbow function was assessed objectively by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and subjectively by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) questionnaire. The mean follow-up of patients was 60.3 months (SD 28.5). The mean elbow flexion-extension ROM was 95.8° (SD 21). The mean MSTS of the patients was 84.4 (SD 8.2), the mean TESS was 83.8 (SD 6.7), and the mean MEPS was 79.2 (SD 11.5). All the patients had radiological union at the osteotomy site. Symptomatic osteoarthritic change was observed in three patients (23%), one of whom ended up with elbow joint fusion. Two patients (15.4%) had recurrence during the follow-up period. Surgical complications included two allograft fractures, two plate fractures, three medial instabilities, and two infections. Osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction provides acceptable functional outcomes. Despite a high rate of complications, it is still a valuable reconstruction method, particularly in skeletally immature patients who need their distal humerus physis for the rest of hand growth.

The exponential growth of nonsurgeons performing fusions for low-back pain.

This study aimed to report changes in utilization and payment trends of low-back pain (LBP) interventions and the impact of nonsurgeon interventionalists on these changes. Medicare Part B national summary data files were used to gather annual utilization and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data for LBP interventions from 2000 to 2021. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes were grouped as decompression, spinal fusion, sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), physical therapy (PT), and chiropractic manipulation (Chiro). The total allowed services and payments were collected for each HCPCS group. CMS provider-level files, available from 2013 to 2021, were used to collect neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, and nonsurgeon interventionalist (interventional radiology and pain management) data for each surgical HCPCS code group (decompression, spinal fusion, and SI joint fusion). The United States Consumer Price Index was used to adjust for inflation. From 2000 to 2021, there were 339,720,725 Medicare-approved interventions and payments of approximately $21 billion for LBP (percentage of cumulative payments: 41.8% Chiro, 16.5% ESI, 14.4% spinal fusion, 14.3% PT, 10.2% decompression, and 0.4% SI joint fusion). In a subgroup analysis, spinal fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (59.2%), neurosurgeons (40.6%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (< 1%) from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon fusion utilization each grew by < 3% and associated Medicare payments to each specialty declined by 1% each year. During the same period, nonsurgeon interventionalist utilization grew 26% each year and associated Medicare payments to nonsurgeon interventionalists for spine fusions grew 62% each year. In a subgroup analysis, SI joint fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (50.7%), neurosurgeons (24.8%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (24.5%) from 2018 to 2021. Neurosurgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined by 1% each year and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 2% each year. Orthopedic surgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined 1% and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 4% each year. Nonsurgeon interventionalist use of SI joint fusions grew 415% and payments grew 435% each year. The substantial growth in Medicare payments for surgical LBP interventions is disproportionally driven by nonsurgeon interventionalists. The exponential growth of nonsurgeon interventionalists performing spinal fusion surgeries, particularly SI joint fusions, largely accounts for the significant increase in Medicare expenditures.

Catamaran SI Joint Fusion System(R) MAINSAILTM Study: a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, post-market study of six-month clinical outcomes and twelve-month radiographic findings

ABSTRACT Background Minimally invasive surgical techniques for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation have the potential to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes, but evidence remains limited. This interim analysis presents initial findings from an ongoing prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Catamaran System. Methods The primary endpoint of success at 6 months was defined as a ≥20 mm improvement in SIJ pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), no neurologic worsening, absence of device-related serious adverse events (SAEs), and no surgical reintervention. Secondary endpoints included 6 month evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), patient satisfaction, and 12 month radiographic CT fusion, performed by an indpendent radiologist. Results Thirty-three consecutive patients (mean age: 58.9 years; %-females: 76%; Body Mass Index: 30.5) were treated across six U.S. clinical sites. At the primary endpoint of 6 months, 80% of patients met the criteria for success, with no device-related SAEs and no surgical reintervention reported. VASSIJ-Pain significantly decreased from preoperative levels (mean: 80.9 mm) to 6 months postoperatively (31.1 mm; p < 0.001). Mean ODI scores also showed a significant improvement from preoperative values (51.9%) to 6 months postoperatively (29.6%, p < 0.01). Patients reported high satisfaction rates throughout all follow-ups, with 93.3% of patients being satisfied at 6 months. Conclusion In patients diagnosed with chronic SIJ pain, minimally invasive inferior-posterior delivery of the Catamaran implant was safe and effective in relieving pain and reducing disability.

Effect of Distraction Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ankle Arthritis.

Currently, the traditional treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis is joint fusion or joint replacement. The aim of this article is to explore the clinical efficacy of distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis. A retrospective analysis was conducted with a total of 34 cases who were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis and treated by distraction arthroplasty from January 2007 to November 2021. The average age was 42.3 years. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and pain visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate ankle pain and functional improvement before surgery and at the last follow-up. Based on age, the patients were divided into the ≤45-year-old group [young group, 15 cases, age (36.37 ± 4.31) years old] and the >45-year-old group [middle-aged and elderly group, 19 cases, age (53.74 ± 3.17) years old]. The analysis included comparing preoperative and postoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot and VAS scores and the influence of age on distraction arthroplasty. All 34 patients were followed up, and the follow-up time ranged from 13 to 143 months, with an average of 45.3 months. The follow-up times for the young and middle-to-elderly groups were (33.19 ± 21.37) months and (55.63 ± 29.69) months, respectively. At the last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot and VAS scores were significantly improved compared with the preoperative assessment (p < 0.05). According to the etiological analysis, except for Pilon fracture, which showed no differences pre- and postoperation in the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score (p > 0.05), all other patients showed significant differences in these two scores (p < 0.05). The difference in preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores between the young and middle-to-elderly groups was statistically significant (t = 3.422, p = 0.021). The preoperative and postoperative comparison of preoperative VAS scores, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores, and VAS scores before and after surgery showed no differences (p > 0.05). The joint space width (JSW) of 10 patients who were followed up for more than 5 years was (2.9 ± 0.5) mm. Two patients who were followed up for more than 10 years showed 3.3 and 3.0 mm, respectively, JSW. Distraction arthroplasty with the Ilizarov external fixator can achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis (except arthritis caused by Pilon fracture surgery). Age has no statistical impact on the efficacy of distraction arthroplasty.

Charcot reconstruction using a novel intramedullary nail along the medial column: 3-5 year follow-up results

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a destructive, chronic disease of the bone structure and joints, and is identified in patients experiencing peripheral neuropathy, frequently associated with diabetes. The foot and ankle are most impacted by Charcot neuroarthropathy; whereas the goal of management is to stabilize the joint to avoid pedal collapse, infection, and foot amputation. Novel surgical approaches and hardware have shown promise in achieving these goals, allowing patients to return to ambulation, while avoiding late-stage complications. This multicenter, retrospective, consecutive case series reviewed individuals with midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy who underwent surgical reconstruction using a novel locking intramedullary nail (LIN) in the medial column with at least 36 months of follow-up. Patients were treated between 2019 and 2021.This report presents data and outcomes on 30 patients with Charcot disease treated with a LIN to achieve stability and fusion along the medial column of the reconstruction, with 36-60 months of follow-up data. Of these patients, 93.3% (n = 28) demonstrated complete (multiple joint) fusion along the medial column while there were zero nonunions. Overall, the mean time to fusion was 14.1 weeks (range 10-18 weeks) and 18.1 weeks mean time to functional braced-weightbearing (range 12-28 weeks). Overall, this retrospective review investigated the long-term use of a novel LIN in Charcot neuroarthropathy patients. The success of this LIN was demonstrated by the rate of fusion and time to functional braced-weightbearing, and safety was demonstrated by the low incidence of adverse events. Overall, these results indicate that use of a LIN within the medial column to be successful in the surgical reconstruction of an unstable midfoot Charcot deformity.