Jig-based Total Knee Arthroplasty Research Articles

ROBOTIC-ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IS ASSOCIATED WITH EARLIER RETURN OF SYMMETRICAL LIMB FUNCTION COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

IntroductionRobotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated significant benefits, including improved accuracy of component positioning compared to conventional jig-based TKA. However, previous studies have often failed to associate these findings with clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a more nuanced assessment of a patient's functional recovery after TKA. This study aims to compare outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted and conventional TKA in the early postoperative period using conventional PROMS and wearable sensors.Method100 patients with symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA were included in this study (44 robotic-assisted TKA and 56 conventional TKA). Functional outcomes were assessed using ankle-worn IMUs and PROMs. IMU- based outcomes included impact load, impact asymmetry, maximum knee flexion angle, and bone stimulus. PROMs, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol-Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) were evaluated at preoperative baseline, weeks 2 to 6 postoperatively, and at 3-month postoperative follow-up.ResultsBy postoperative week 6, when compared to conventional TKA, robotic-assisted TKA was associated with significant improvements in maximum knee flexion angle (118o ± 6.6 vs. 113o ± 5.4; p=0.04), symmetrical loading of limbs (82.3% vs.22.4%; p<0.01), cumulative impact load (146.6% vs 37%; p<0.01), and bone stimulus (25.1% vs 13.6%; p<0.01). Whilst there were no significant differences in PROMs (OKS, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, and FJS-12) at any time point between the two groups, when comparing OKS subscales, significantly more robotic-assisted TKA patients achieved an ‘excellent’ outcome at 6 weeks compared to conventional (47% vs 41%, p= 0.013).ConclusionsIMU-based metrics detected an earlier return to function among patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA that PROMs were unable to detect within the first six weeks of surgery.

Knee

The April 2023 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Does bariatric surgery reduce complications after total knee arthroplasty?; Mid-flexion stability in total knee arthroplasties implanted with kinematic alignment: posterior-stabilized versus medial-stabilized implants; Inflammatory response in robotic-arm-assisted versus conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty; Journey II bicruciate stabilized (JII-BCS) and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty: the CAPAbility, blinded, randomized controlled trial; Lifetime risk of revision and patient factors; Platelet-rich plasma use for hip and knee osteoarthritis in the USA; Where have the knee revisions gone?; Tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: CT-based study of 1,351 tibiae.

INTRODUCTION OF ROSA ROBOTIC ARM SYSTEM FOR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IS ASSOCIATED WITH A MINIMAL LEARNING CURVE FOR OPERATIVE TIME

The introduction of robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) into the operating theatre is often associated with a learning curve and is potentially associated with additional complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve of robotic-assisted (RA) TKA within a multi-surgeon team.This prospective cohort study included 83 consecutive conventional jig-based TKAs compared with 53 RA TKAs using the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) for knee osteoarthritis performed by three high-volume (> 100 TKA per year) orthopaedic surgeons. Baseline characteristics including age, BMI, sex and pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence grade were well-matched between the conventional and RA TKA groups. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess learning curves for operative times for each surgeon. Peri-operative and delayed complications were reviewed.The CUSUM analysis for operative time demonstrated an inflexion point after 5, 6 and 15 cases for each of the three surgeons, or 8.7 cases on average. There were no significant differences (p = 0.53) in operative times between the RA TKA learning (before inflexion point) and proficiency (after inflexion point) phases. Similarly, the operative times of the RA TKA group did not differ significantly (p = 0.92) from the conventional TKA group. There was no discernible learning curve for the accuracy of component planning using the RA TKA system. The average length of post-operative follow-up was 21.3 ± 9.0 months. There was no significant difference (p > 0.99) in post-operative complication rates between the groups.The introduction of the RA TKA system was associated with a learning curve for operative time of 8.7 cases. Operative times between the RA TKA and conventional TKA group were similar. The short learning curve implies this RA TKA system can be adopted relatively quickly into a surgical team with minimal risks to patients.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves the rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components, but not the forgotten joint score 12: a single-center retrospective cohort study

PurposeThe primary aim of this study was to compare postoperative short-term patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial following conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (Conv-TKA) versus robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements.MethodsThis retrospective, consecutive case–control trial included 83 patients with varus osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing Conv-TKA versus RA-TKA using bi-cruciate stabilized TKA. The rotational mismatch of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups were compared using 3DCT measurements. PROMs (2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12), patella score were compared in patients between 1 and 2 years postoperatively.ResultsThe two groups did not exhibit significant differences in any of the following preoperative factors: age at surgery, body mass index (BMI), preoperative range of motion (ROM), hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. There were no significant differences in postoperative HKA angle and tibial rotation angle, the absolute values of the femoral rotational angle and rotational mismatch were significantly smaller in the RA-TKA group than in the Conv-TKA group (both p < 0.01). Neither Postoperative PROMs (2011 KSS: pain, patient satisfaction, patient expectation, advanced activities score) nor patella score differed significantly between the groups, but FJS-12 was significantly better in the Conv-TKA group than in the RA-TKA group (p < 0.01).ConclusionsRA-TKA did not improve FJS-12 compared to Conv-TKA, but did result in more accurate rotational alignment of femoral component and rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components.Level of evidenceIV.

Introduction of ROSA robotic-arm system for total knee arthroplasty is associated with a minimal learning curve for operative time

PurposeThe introduction of robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) into the operating theatre is often associated with a learning curve and is potentially associated with additional complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve of robotic-assisted (RA) TKA within a multi-surgeon team.MethodsThis prospective cohort study included 83 consecutive conventional jig-based TKAs compared with 53 RA TKAs using the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) for knee osteoarthritis performed by three high-volume (> 100 TKA per year) orthopaedic surgeons. Baseline characteristics including age, BMI, sex and pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence graded and Hip-Knee-Ankle Axis were well-matched between the conventional and RA TKA groups. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess learning curves for operative times for each surgeon. Peri-operative and delayed complications (infection, periprosthetic fracture, thromboembolism, and compromised wound healing) and revisions were reviewed.ResultsThe CUSUM analysis for operative time demonstrated an inflexion point after 5, 6 and 15 cases for each of the three surgeons, or 8.7 cases on average. There were no significant differences (p = 0.53) in operative times between the RA TKA learning (before inflexion point) and proficiency (after inflexion point) phases. Similarly, the operative times of the RA TKA group did not differ significantly (p = 0.92) from the conventional TKA group. There was no discernible learning curve for the accuracy of component planning using the RA TKA system. The average length of post-operative follow-up was 21.3 ± 9.0 months. There was one revision for instability in the conventional TKA group and none in the RA TKA group. There were no significant difference (p > 0.99) in post-operative complication rates between the conventional TKA and RA TKA groups.ConclusionsThe introduction of the RA TKA system was associated with a learning curve for operative time of 8.7 cases. Operative times between the RA TKA and conventional TKA group were similar. The short learning curve implies this RA TKA system can be adopted relatively quickly into a surgical team with minimal risks to patients.

Learning curve for robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty: our experience with imageless hand-held Navio system.

The main purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve of Robotic assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty surgery through assessment of operative time and comparison with that of conventional jig based Total Knee Arthroplasty. The study included our first 75 Robotic assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty and 25 randomly selected conventional jig-based Total knee arthroplasty from June 2017 to December 2017. The 75 cases were divided into 3 groups of 25 consecutive cases. The mean of operative time for each phase and total time was compared between the 3 groups and with the mean of total time for conventional jig based group. In our experience, Robotic assisted Total Knee arthroplasty was associated with a learning curve of approximately 25 cases. The mean for Registration phase of Group A (1st set of 25 cases) was 6.12min (SD 1.8min), group B (2nd set of 25 cases) was 4.46min (SD 0.79min) and group C (3rd set of 25 cases) was 4.17min (SD 0.59min). The mean for Planning phase of group A was 5.08min (SD 1.01min), group B was 4.04min (SD 0.37min) and group C was 4.01min (SD 0.35min). The mean for Cutting Phase of group A was 28.22min (SD 6.24min), group B was 22.49min (SD 0.79min) and group C was 22.36min (SD 0.88min). The mean for total time of group A was 39.42min (SD 8.02), group B was 31min (SD 1.22min), group C was 30.53min (SD 1.14min) and conventional group was 30.54min (SD 1.14min). On comparing the Registration phase (Group A vs B, p < 0.001; Group B vs C, p 0.14; Group A vs C, p < 0.001), Planning phase (Group A vs B, p < 0.001; Group B vs C, p 0.75; Group A vs C, p < 0.001), Cutting phase (Group A vs B, p < 0.001; Group B vs C, p 0.58; Group A vs C, p < 0.001) and Total time (Group A vs B, p < 0.001; Group B vs C, p 0.74; Group A vs C, p < 0.001; Group A vs Conventional, p < 0.001; Group B vs Conventional, p 0.17, Group C vs Conventional, p 0.99), the results showed that the inflection point for learning curve in our hands was 25 cases. The learning curve and increased operation theatre time are likely to be major barrier in widespread acceptance of robotic technology amongst arthroplasty surgeons. We, in our experience can say that the learning curve was approximately 25 cases. The results of this study will help the arthroplasty surgeons in accepting this technology and achieve better outcomes.

Soft-tissue penetration of the oscillating saw during tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.

Inadvertent soft tissue damage caused by the oscillating saw during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) occurs when the sawblade passes beyond the bony boundaries into the soft tissue. The primary objective of this study is to assess the risk of inadvertent soft tissue damage during jig-based TKA by evaluating the excursion of the oscillating saw past the bony boundaries. The second objective is the investigation of the relation between this excursion and the surgeon's experience level. A conventional jig-based TKA procedure with medial parapatellar approach was performed on 12 cadaveric knees by three experienced surgeons and three residents. During the proximal tibial resection, the motion of the oscillating saw with respect to the tibia was recorded. The distance of the outer point of this cutting portion to the edge of the bone was defined as the excursion of the oscillating saw. The excursion of the sawblade was evaluated in six zones containing the following structures: medial collateral ligament (MCL), posteromedial corner (PMC), iliotibial band (ITB), lateral collateral ligament (LCL), popliteus tendon (PopT), and neurovascular bundle (NVB). The mean 75th percentile value of the excursion of all cases was mean 2.8 mm (SD 2.9) for the MCL zone, mean 4.8 mm (SD 5.9) for the PMC zone, mean 3.4 mm (SD 2.0) for the ITB zone, mean 6.3 mm (SD 4.8) for the LCL zone, mean 4.9 mm (SD 5.7) for the PopT zone, and mean 6.1 mm (SD 3.9) for the NVB zone. Experienced surgeons had a significantly lower excursion than residents. This study showed that the oscillating saw significantly passes the edge of the bone during the tibial resection in TKA, even in experienced hands. While reported neurovascular complications in TKA are rare, direct injury to the capsule and stabilizing structures around the knee is a consequence of the use of a hand-held oscillating saw when making the tibial cut. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1324-1330.

Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of implant positioning and reduces outliers in achieving the planned limb alignment compared to conventional jig-based TKA.Robotic TKA does not have a learning curve effect for achieving the planned implant positioning. The learning curve for achieving operative times comparable to conventional jig-based TKA is 7-20 robotic TKA cases.Cadaveric studies have shown robotic TKA is associated with reduced iatrogenic injury to the periarticular soft tissue envelope compared to conventional jig-based TKA.Robotic TKA is associated with decreased postoperative pain, enhanced early functional rehabilitation, and decreased time to hospital discharge compared to conventional jig-based TKA. However, there are no differences in medium- to long-term functional outcomes between conventional jig-based TKA and robotic TKA.Limitations of robotic TKA include high installation costs, additional radiation exposure, learning curves for gaining surgical proficiency, and compatibility of the robotic technology with a limited number of implant designs.Further higher quality studies are required to compare differences in conventional TKA versus robotic TKA in relation to long-term functional outcomes, implant survivorship, time to revision surgery, and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:611-617. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190022.

Minimal under-correction gives better outcomes following total knee arthroplasty in severe varus knees-myth or reality?-analysis of one hundred sixty two knees with varus greater than fifteen degrees.

To document and compare the functional outcome of neutral alignment and under-correction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in severe varus knees of more than 15° at three and 12months post-surgery. One hundred twenty-four consecutive patients (163 TKAs) of an average age of 61.9years (52-79) with a pre-operative varus more than 15° were managed with jig-based TKA. Based on the post-operative mechanical femorotibial alignment (FTMA), they were categorised into three groups, namely neutral (180+3°), mild varus (173° to 176°) and severe varus (172° and below). The outcomes of these three groups were assessed at three and 12months by the Oxford knee score and the WOMAC score were calculated and co-related to the extent of correction. At threemonths, knees in the mild varus group (n = 88) had the best results with an Oxford knee score of 41.76+1.44 and a WOMAC score of 19.29+2.93 compared to the severe varus group and the neutral alignment group which had Oxford knee scores (OKS) of 37.43+2.51 and 31.91+3.51 and WOMAC scores of 22.57+1.51 and 24.46+4.15 respectively. However at 12months, knees in all the groups (neutral, mild varus, severe varus) had similar good functional outcomes with OKS of 39.08 + 1.68, 39.24 + 1.88, 39.29 + 1.11 and WOMAC scores of 17.42+2.15, 16.48+2.11, 16.14+1.21 respectively. A scatter plot done for post-operative FTMA and the functional outcome score for both scores showed a bell curve with the best outcome corresponding to a FTMA of 175° at 3months and equal distribution for both scores at 12months. The results of our study showed that minimal under-correction gave superior functional outcomes at threemonths. But this advantage was temporary and both, under-correction and neutral alignment achieved equally good outcomes at oneyear. Considering the increased prosthesis longevity associated with neutral alignment, we propose that neutral alignment must be aimed for during TKA for knees with severe varus. Prospective study.

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty

AimsThe objective of this study was to compare early postoperative functional outcomes and time to hospital discharge between conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and robotic-arm assisted TKA.Patients and MethodsThis prospective cohort study included 40 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based TKA followed by 40 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted TKA. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the medial parapatellar approach with identical implant designs and standardized postoperative inpatient rehabilitation. Inpatient functional outcomes and time to hospital discharge were collected in all study patients.ResultsThere were no systematic differences in baseline characteristics between the conventional jig-based TKA and robotic-arm assisted TKA treatment groups with respect to age (p = 0.32), gender (p = 0.50), body mass index (p = 0.17), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.88), and preoperative haemoglobin level (p = 0.82). Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), decreased reduction in postoperative haemoglobin levels (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001) and improved maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based TKA. Median time to hospital discharge in robotic-arm assisted TKA was 77 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 74 to 81) compared with 105 hours (IQR 98 to 126) in conventional jig-based TKA (p < 0.001).ConclusionRobotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with decreased pain, improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based TKA.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:930–7.

Iatrogenic Bone and Soft Tissue Trauma in Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Conventional Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study and Validation of a New Classification System

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to compare macroscopic bone and soft tissue injury between robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (CJ-TKA) and create a validated classification system for reporting iatrogenic bone and periarticular soft tissue injury after TKA. MethodsThis study included 30 consecutive CJ-TKAs followed by 30 consecutive RA-TKAs performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperative photographs of the femur, tibia, and periarticular soft tissues were taken before implantation of prostheses. Using these outcomes, the macroscopic soft tissue injury (MASTI) classification system was developed to grade iatrogenic bone and soft tissue injuries. Interobserver and Intraobserver validity of the proposed classification system was assessed. ResultsPatients undergoing RA-TKA had reduced medial soft tissue injury in both passively correctible (P < .05) and noncorrectible varus deformities (P < .05); more pristine femoral (P < .05) and tibial (P < .05) bone resection cuts; and improved MASTI scores compared to CJ-TKA (P < .05). There was high interobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92 [95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96], P < .05) and intraobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.94 [95% confidence interval: 0.92-0.97], P < .05) of the proposed MASTI classification system. ConclusionThere is reduced bone and periarticular soft tissue injury in patients undergoing RA-TKA compared to CJ-TKA. The proposed MASTI classification system is a reproducible grading scheme for describing iatrogenic bone and soft tissue injury in TKA. Clinical RelevanceRA-TKA is associated with reduced bone and soft tissue injury compared with conventional jig-based TKA. The proposed MASTI classification may facilitate further research correlating macroscopic soft tissue injury during TKA to long-term clinical and functional outcomes.

Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) has perceived advantages in the early postoperative stage for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is not clear whether the improved radiographic alignment achieved by computer-assisted navigation surgery (CAS) improves midterm clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes of MIS TKA performed with and without CAS after a minimum follow-up of 7 years. MethodsBetween 2007 and 2009, 50 patients underwent CAS and MIS TKA, and 50 patients underwent jig-based MIS TKA in this prospective study. Ninety-six patients were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, and clinical and radiological evaluations were performed. ResultsMidterm results demonstrated that the Knee Society knee score, function score, and range of motion were comparable in the 2 groups. The percentage of patients with the mechanical axis within ±3° of neutral was significantly higher in the CAS group than in the jig-based group (94% vs 79%, respectively; P = .038). No knees had loosening after TKA. However, 1 patient in the CAS group demonstrated late infection 4 years postoperatively. ConclusionCAS did not improve midterm outcomes after MIS TKA compared with jig-based surgery, although CAS reduced outliers in coronal alignment.

Surgeon variability in total knee arthroplasty component alignment: a Monte Carlo analysis

Component mal-alignment in total knee arthroplasty has been associated with increased revision rates and poor clinical outcomes. A significant source of variability in traditional, jig-based total knee arthroplasty is the performance of the surgeon. The purpose of this study was to determine the most sensitive steps in the femoral and tibia arthroplasty procedures. A computational model of the total knee arthroplasty procedure was created, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed that included surgeon variability in each step of the procedure. The proportion of well-aligned components from the model agrees with clinical literature in most planes. When components must be aligned within ±3° in all planes, component alignment was most sensitive to the accuracy of identifying the lateral epicondyle for the femoral component, and to the precision of the transverse plane alignment of the extramedullary guide for the tibial component. This model can be used as a tool for evaluating different procedural approaches or sources of variability to improve the quality of the total knee arthroplasty procedure.

Kinematic analysis of leg alignment during conventional versus navigated total knee arthroplasty: Initial results of a prospective study

Current kinematic navigation systems provide real-time spatial analyses of leg alignments during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) instead of delayed radiographic verification after surgery. A prospective study was conducted to investigate leg alignments of TKAs that underwent different surgical guidance [intramedullary (IM) jig-based vs. navigation-assisted] using a kinematic navigation system. Since May 2007, patients admitted for primary TKA were considered for inclusion. Within 6 months, 38 sets of intraoperative analyses on the operated legs have been performed. Excluding seven unreliable data sets, 15 conventional IM jig-based TKAs and 16 navigation-assisted TKAs were available. The leg alignments in maximum knee extension were retrieved for comparison. Although similar final coronal alignments were accurately achieved in both groups (0.21 valgus in the IM group vs. 0.17 valgus in the NA group, p=0.993), a more flexed sagittal axis was constructed with conventional IM jigs (1.93 flexion in the IM group vs. 0.58 extension in the NA group, p<0.05). The study suggests that comparable coronal precision could be achieved with conventional IM jigs by trained surgeons, although computer-assisted navigation is a documented method to restore accurate alignment. Different sagittal alignments observed in this study indicate the inherent discrepancy between different surgical guides as well as their according concepts.

Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome

Correct alignment of the leg and positioning of the components are important factors in good long-term outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer-assisted navigation systems were introduced to improve component alignment accuracies. The three main hypotheses of this study were that the navigated compared to jig-based patient will show the following: (1) No difference in clinical outcomes. (2) Better alignment in the frontal and sagittal plane. (3) Better rotational positioning of components. The authors evaluated 100 patients who had minimally invasive TKA using either an image-free computer-assisted navigation system (n=50) or a jig-based technique (n=50). Six months postoperatively, clinical and radiological evaluations were performed using full-length standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and CT scans of the knee. Knee Society knee score, function score, and range of motion were comparable in the two groups after surgery. The percentage of patients with a frontal tibiofemoral angle within ±3° of the ideal was significantly higher in the navigated group than in the jig-based group (94% vs. 78%, respectively; P=0.041). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of the frontal and sagittal planes as well as rotational alignment of the femoral or tibial components. Computer-assisted TKA gives a better correction of alignment of the leg compared with jig-based TKA when combined with a minimally invasive surgical approach.