Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines Research Articles

Quality control of lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer

Numerous studies have confirmed that D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Standardized lymph node dissection plays a crucial role in ensuring surgical quality and efficacy. It is recommended to perform D2 lymph node dissection according to the 6th edition of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. For lymph nodes beyond the scope of D2 lymph node dissection, such as No.10, 13, 14v, 16 and mediastinal lymph nodes, selective D2+ lymph node dissection can be performed, which may be advantageous for some patients. Currently, omentectomy is the standard surgical procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the clinical significance of gastrectomy with preservation of the greater omentum requires further validation through large-scale clinical trials. Standardized ex vivo lymph node dissection is important for accurate postoperative staging, and it is recommended to harvest more than 30 lymph nodes to avoid staging deviation.

Oligometastasis of Gastric Cancer: A Review

The concept of oligometastasis is not yet fully established in the field of gastric cancer. However, metastatic lesions that are localized, technically resectable at diagnosis, present a certain response to preoperative chemotherapy, and present favorable survival outcomes with local treatments, sometimes in combination with chemotherapy, are recognized as oligometastasis in the field of gastric cancer. Oligometastasis is noted in European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines and Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines, and local treatment is mentioned as one of the pivotal treatment options for oligometastasis. Solitary liver metastasis or a small number of liver metastases; retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis, especially localized para-aortic lymph node metastasis; localized peritoneal dissemination; and Krukenberg tumor are representative types of oligometastasis in gastric cancer. The AIO-FLOT3 trial prospectively evaluated the efficacy of multimodal treatments for gastric cancer with oligometastasis, including surgical resection of primary and metastatic lesions combined with chemotherapy, confirming favorable survival outcomes. Two phase 3 studies are ongoing to investigate the efficacy of surgical resection combined with perioperative chemotherapy compared with palliative chemotherapy. Thus far, the evidence suggests that multimodal treatment for oligometastasis of gastric cancer is promising.

The correlation between No. 6 and No. 14v lymph node metastasis and the value of dissecting these lymph nodes in radical gastrectomy

Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy has been widely performed as the standard surgery for patients with gastric cancer in major medical centers in China and abroad. However, the exact extent of lymph node dissection is still controversial. In the latest version of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, No. 14v lymph nodes (along the root of the superior mesenteric vein) are again defined as loco-regional lymph nodes, and it is clarified that distal gastric cancer presenting with infra-pyloric regional lymph node (No.6) metastasis is recommended for D2+ superior mesenteric vein (No. 14v) lymph node dissection. To explore the relevance and clinical significance of No.6 and No.14v lymphadenectomy in radical gastric cancer surgery, a review of the national and international literature revealed that No.6 lymph node metastasis was associated with No.14v lymph node metastasis, that No.6 lymph node status was a valid predictor of No.14v lymph node negative status and false negative rate, and that for gastric cancer patients with No. 14v lymph node negative and No.6 lymph node positive, the dissection of No.14v lymph node may also have some significance. The addition of No. 14v lymph node dissection in radical gastrectomy is safe, but it is more important to distinguish the patients who can benefit from it. Professor Liang Han of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital is currently leading a multicenter, large-sample, prospective clinical trial (NCT02272894) in China, which is expected to provide higher level evidence for the clinical significance of lymph node dissection in No.14v.

Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition)

The sixth edition of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines was completed in July 2021, incorporating new evidence that emerged after publication of the previous edition. It consists of a text-based “Treatments” part and a “Clinical Questions” part including recommendations and explanations for clinical questions. The treatments parts include a comprehensive description regarding surgery, endoscopic resection and chemotherapy for gastric cancer. The clinical question part is based on the literature search and evaluation by an independent systematic review team. Consequently, not only evidence for each therapeutic recommendation was clearly shown, but it also identified the research fields that require further evaluation to provide appropriate recommendations.

Number of Examined Lymph Nodes as a Risk Factor for Recurrence in pT1N+ or pT2-3N0 Gastric Cancer.

Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy for pathological stage (p) T1N+ or pT2~3N0 gastric cancer. However, some patients experience disease recurrence. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for recurrence in pT1N+ or pT2-3N0 gastric cancer. The study included 157 patients with diagnosed pT1N+ or pT2-3N0 gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy at our institution between January 2001 and December 2020. Clinicopathological data and surgical data were obtained. Independent prognostic factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Thirteen patients (8.3%) experienced disease recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of examined lymph nodes was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio=10.90; 95% confidence interval=1.39-85.86; p=0.023). The group with ≤35 examined lymph nodes had significantly worse recurrence-free survival compared with the group with ≥36 examined lymph nodes (80.7% versus 98.7%; p=0.0005). The number of examined lymph nodes (≤35) was an independent risk factor for recurrence after radical gastrectomy with pT1N+ or pT2-3N0 gastric cancer.

How to Decide Approaches and Procedures for Early and Advanced Gastric Cancer?

In the 6th edition of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, laparoscopic surgery is recommended as one of the standard treatments for cStage I. On the other hand, the recommendation of robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer was also added, albeit not conclusively, to perform it for cStage I gastric cancer. Conversely, laparoscopic surgery for cStage II/III is not recommended, and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are being conducted in East Asia to expand the indication for advanced gastric cancer. Although laparoscopic surgery and robot-assisted surgery are now recommended in the Guidelines for Early-Stage Gastric Cancer, each institution should set its own criteria for indications according to its level of proficiency and try to provide high-quality treatment. For advanced gastric cancer, although there is no solid evidence for laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, the reality is that it is already being performed in facilities with ample experience. New evidence is expected to be reported in the future, based on which the recommendations may change.

Nomograms predicting prognosis of patients with pathological stages T1N2-3 and T3N0 gastric cancer

BACKGROUNDPatients with pathological stages T1N2-3 (pT1N2-3) and pT3N0 gastric cancer (GC) have not been routinely included in the target population for postoperative chemotherapy according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guideline, and their prognosis is significantly different. AIMTo identify the high-risk patients after radical surgery by analyzing biomarkers and clinicopathological features and construct prognostic models for them.METHODSA total of 459 patients with pT1N2-3/pT3N0 GC were retrospectively selected for the study. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the differences in the clinicopathological features between the pT1N2-3 and pT3N0 groups. The Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to analyze overall survival (OS). The independent risk factors for patient prognosis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses based on the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The cutoff values of continuous variables were identified by receiver operating characteristic curve. The nomogram models were constructed with R studio.RESULTSThere was no statistically significant difference in OS between the pT1N2-3 and pT3N0 groups (P = 0.374). Prealbumin (P = 0.040), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) (P = 0.021), and metastatic lymph node ratio (mLNR) (P = 0.035) were independent risk factors for prognosis in the pT1N2-3 group. Age (P = 0.039), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.002), and gastrectomy (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for prognosis in the pT3N0 group. The area under the curve values of the nomogram models for predicting the 5-year prognosis of the pT1N2-3 group and pT3N0 group were 0.765 and 0.699, respectively.CONCLUSIONNomogram model combining prealbumin, CEA, and mLNR levels can be used to predict the prognosis of pT1N2-3 GC. Nomogram model combining age, BMI, and gastrectomy can be used to predict the prognosis of pT3N0 GC.

Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial)

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted as a local treatment for gastrointestinal tract tumors. As a simplified endoscopic procedure, hybrid ESD (H-ESD) has been performed for colorectal neoplasms in recent times. However, whether H-ESD is superior to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for patients with early gastric neoplasms (EGN) remains unclear. In this trial, we will compare the treatment outcomes of H-ESD and C-ESD. We hypothesize that the procedure time for H-ESD is shorter than that for C-ESD.MethodsThis is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial to be conducted beginning in August 2020 at nine institutions in Japan. We will determine if H-ESD is superior to C-ESD in terms of procedure time in patients with EGN diagnosed as macroscopically intramucosal (T1a) differentiated carcinoma ≤ 20 mm in diameter without ulcerative findings according to current Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. A total of 82 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the C-ESD or the H-ESD group. The primary outcome is ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes include mucosal incision, time and speed of submucosal dissection, en bloc resection, complete resection, curability, adverse events related to the ESD procedure, extent of dissection before snaring, volume of injection solution, number and time of hemostasis, thickness of the submucosal layer in the resected specimen, and handover to another operator. The stated sample size was determined based on the primary outcome. According to a previous report comparing the procedure times of C-ESD and H-ESD, we hypothesized that H-ESD would provide a 0.2 reduction in logarithmically concerted procedure time (−37%). We estimated that a total of 82 participants were needed to reach a power of 80% for a t-test with a significance level of 0.05 and considering a 10% dropout.DiscussionThis trial will provide high-quality data on the benefits and risks of H-ESD for EGN patients. The results of this study could lead to improved outcomes in patients with EGN undergoing ESD. The results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR UMIN000041244. Registered on July 29, 2020.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Tube Carcinoma after Esophagectomy Contributes to Long-Term Outcomes.

The incidence of gastric tube carcinoma (GTC) after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma has increased in recent years. Surgical removal of the reconstructed gastric tube is associated with high mortality, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a promising alternative. There are limited reports of ESD for GTC. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of ESD in GTC. This single-center retrospective study examined patients who underwent ESD for GTC after esophagectomy at our institution between 2003 and 2018. The curability of GTC with ESD was evaluated histologically according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines. Patient characteristics and procedural and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Overall, 31 patients (29 men and 2 women; median age, 73 years) with 45 GTC lesions underwent ESD. The mean period between primary esophagectomy and the diagnosis of GTC was 10.6 years. Bleeding during ESD was noted in two patients (6.5%). No other adverse or fatal events such as perforation were noted. Complete resection and curative resection were documented in 80.6% and 48.4% of cases, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 67.6% and 47.7%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 100% and 92.9%, respectively. One patient died of GTC, and fourteen patients died of other diseases, including primary carcinoma in five cases. ESD was safe and provided good long-term outcomes in patients with GTC. Regular long-term gastroscopy is required for the early detection of GTC. Patients with GTC after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma have a high risk of other primary carcinomas or comorbidities after ESD.

Feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years.

BACKGROUNDEndoscopic resection, especially endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is increasingly performed in elderly patients with early gastric cancer, and lesions beyond the expanded indications are also resected endoscopically in some patients. It is essential to assess whether gastric ESD is safe and suitable for elderly patients and investigate what type of lesions carry an increased risk of ESD-related complications.AIMTo assess the efficacy and feasibility of gastric ESD for elderly patients, and define high-risk lesions and prognostic indicators.METHODSAmong a total of 1169 sessions of gastric ESD performed in Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital from 2006 to 2014, 179 sessions (15.3%) were performed in patients aged ≥ 80 years, and 172 of these sessions were done in patients with a final diagnosis of gastric cancer. These patients were studied retrospectively to evaluate short-term outcomes and survival. The short-term outcomes included the rates of en bloc resection and curative resection, complications, and procedure-related mortality. Curability was assessed according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2010. Fisher’s exact test was used to statistically analyze risk factors. Clinical characteristics of each group were compared using Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. Survival rates at each time point were based on Kaplan-Meier estimation. Overall survival rates were compared between patients with gastric cancer in each group with use of the log-rank test. To identify prognostic factors that jointly predict the hazard of death while controlling for model overfitting, we used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model including factors curative/ noncurative, age, gender, body mass index, prognostic nutritional index, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Glasgow prognostic score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and antithrombotic agent use. We selected the LASSO Cox regression model that resulted in minimal prediction error in 10-fold cross-validation. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTSThe en bloc dissection rate was 97.1%, indicating that a high quality of treatment was achieved even in elderly patients. As for complications, the rates of bleeding, perforation and aspiration pneumonitis were 3.4%, 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. These complication rates indicated that ESD was not associated with a particularly higher risk in elderly patients than in nonelderly patients. A dissection incision > 40 mm, lesions associated with depressions, and lesions with ulcers were risk factors for post-ESD bleeding, and location of the lesion in the upper third of the stomach was a risk factor for perforation in elderly patients (P < 0.05). Location of the lesion in the lower third of the stomach tended to be associated with a higher risk of bleeding. The overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between curative and noncurative ESD (P = 0.69). In patients without additional surgery, OS rate was significantly lower in patients with a high CCI (≥ 2) than in those with a low CCI (≤ 1) (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONGastric ESD is feasible even in patients aged ≥ 80 years. Observation without additional surgery after noncurative ESD is reasonable, especially in elderly patients with CCI ≥ 2.

Venous Invasion Is a Risk Factor for Recurrence of pT1 Gastric Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis

BackgroundPostoperative adjuvant therapy for early gastric cancer (EGC) has not been widely studied, and there are differing indications for postoperative adjuvant therapy between Western and Asian countries. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for EGC, but it is unclear whether surgery alone is the most appropriate treatment. MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective study of 1001 consecutive patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for pT1 gastric cancer between 1999 and 2013 at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital. ResultsRecurrence was observed in 12 patients, nine of whom as the result of hematogenous metastasis. In all patients with pT1 gastric cancer (n = 1001), lymph node metastasis was identified as an independent predictive factor for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.910, P = 0.002). In patients with pT1N + gastric cancer, however, the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was still high, 90.8%. In patients with pT1N + gastric cancer (n = 97), the presence of venous invasion (pT1N + v +) was identified by univariate and multivariate analyses as an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR = 4.791, P = 0.032). In patients with venous invasion, the 5-year DSS rate was significantly lower than that in those without venous invasion (79.3% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.018). ConclusionsLong-term prognosis of patients with EGC with lymph node metastasis is good, but venous invasion is associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Selective application of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for pT1N + v + gastric cancer may efficiently improve prognosis among patients with EGC.

Determination of Additional Surgery after Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Practically Modified Application of the eCura System.

Simple SummaryRecent treatment guidelines for gastric cancer recommended additional surgery for patients with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, this strategy may be too excessive since few patients have lymph node metastasis (LNM). In this study, we modified the eCura system, a risk-scoring system for LNM after non-curative ESD, by classifying lymphatic invasion and venous invasion as a single entity of lymphovascular invasion. By using the modified eCura system, patients after non-curative ESD were simply categorized into high- and low-risk groups as lymph node metastasis depending on whether the tumor had lymphovascular invasion and other risk factors or not. Moreover, there was no intermediate-risk group, which could not recommend the appropriate treatment modality in the eCura system.Background: Additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may be excessive as few patients have lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is necessary to develop a risk stratification system for LNM after non-curative ESD, such as the eCura system, which was introduced in the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. However, the eCura system requires venous and lymphatic invasion to be separately assessed, which is difficult to distinguish without special immunostaining. In this study, we practically modified the eCura system by classifying lymphatic and venous invasion as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Method: We retrospectively reviewed 543 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy after non-curative ESD between 2006 and 2019. LNM was evaluated according to LVI as well as size >30 mm, submucosal invasion ≥500 µm, and vertical margin involvement, which were used in the eCura system. Results: LNM was present in 8.1% of patients; 3.6%, 2.3%, 7.4%, 18.3%, and 61.5% of patients with no, one, two, three, and four risk factors had LNM, respectively. The LNM rate in the patients with no risk factors (3.6%) was not significantly different from that in patients with one risk factor (2.3%, p = 0.523). Among patients with two risk factors, the LNM rate without LVI was significantly lower than with LVI (2.4% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.027). Among patients with three risk factors, the LNM rate without LVI was lower than with LVI (0% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.195), although not statistically significantly. Based on LNM rates according to risk factors, patients with LVI and other factors were assigned to the high-risk group (LNM, 17.4%) while other patients as a low-risk group (LNM, 2.4%). Conclusions: Modifying the eCura system by classifying lymphatic and venous invasion as LVI successfully stratified LNM risk after non-curative ESD. Moreover, the high-risk group can be simply identified based on LVI and the presence of other risk factors.

Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and segmental gastrectomy: discrimination of concepts and surgical procedures

Both pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) and segmental gastrectomy (SG) achieve the preservation of gastric cardia and pylorus through the circumferential resection of stomach, while concepts and surgical procedures of these two operations are obviously different. In this sense, transectional gastrectomy includes both PPG and SG. PPG is one of the standard surgical procedure for early gastric cancer (EGC). The extent of lymph node dissection (No.1, 3, 4sb, 4d, 6, 7, 8a, 9) and the retention of infrapyloric vessels, hepatic and pyloric branch of vagal nerve has formed a consensus. Meanwhile, SG is regarded as an investigational treatment according to the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. It is still controversial and may generate an ethical risk in the clinical practice. This article distinguishes the difference in the concepts and surgical procedures between PPG and SG, assisting a comprehensive evaluation in further research.

Efficacy and Safety of Ramucirumab/nab-paclitaxel for Previously Treated Advanced Gastric Cancer in Community Hospitals.

As the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is free of ethanol and premedication, the duration of administration is shorter and patients can drive themselves to and from the hospital. In the 2018 Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines, ramucirumab (RAM) plus weekly nab-PTX is conditionally recommended for previously treated patients with advanced gastric cancer. Here, we retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of RAM+nab-PTX for such patients in community hospitals. From January 2018 to December 2019, 43 patients with metastatic and recurrent gastric cancer received RAM+nab-PTX treatment. Six patients (13.9%) were older than 80 years and 9 patients (20.9%) showed ECOG-PS 2. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were reviewed retrospectively. Median PFS was 114 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84-190) and median OS was 297 days (95% CI: 180-398). ORR and DCR were 32.4% and 72.2%, respectively. The incidence rates of ≥grade 3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were 53.5% and 2.3%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. RAM plus nab-PTX combination therapy demonstrated manageable toxicity even patients who were elderly or had an ECOG-PS 2. This treatment is useful in community hospital settings.

Clinical Impact of the Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients with Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines recommend S-1 and S-1 plus docetaxel as postoperative chemotherapy for pathological stage II and III gastric cancer (GC). There is currently no strategy for using chemotherapy to treat high-risk recurrent pathological stage II/III. Previous studies reported that the several nutritional, immunological, and inflammatory markers examined the association with clinical outcomes after surgery for GC. Methods: Ninety patients with GC (stage II, n = 48; stage III, n = 42) for whom gastrectomy was performed at our institution between November 2009 and September 2018 were examined. Nutritional, immunological, and inflammatory markers were calculated from blood samples within 1 week before surgery. Results: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) status correlated with the pathological stage and disease recurrence after surgery (p = 0.015 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Thirty-three patients had disease recurrence after gastrectomy (stage II, n = 11; stage III, n = 22). The PNI was significantly lower in the recurrent group than in the non-recurrent group (p = 0.0003). The PNI correlated with overall survival and recurrence-free survival after gastrectomy (p = 0.0021 and p = 0.0001, respectively). A multivariate analysis identified the PNI as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.006). Conclusion: The PNI may be useful for predicting the outcomes of patients with pathological stage II/III GC and may contribute to the selection of an appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

Recurrence after ESD curative resection for early gastric cancer

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is gaining ground as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) that has a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. According to the 5th edition of Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines, annual or biannual follow-up with endoscopy is recommended, but follow-up with abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) for surveillance of metastases is not recommended after the eCuraA resection. However, we experienced a case of lymph node recurrence following ESD resulting in eCuraA.Case presentationA 76-year-old female received ESD for EGC in a previous hospital 4 years ago. Pathological findings were tub1, 30 mm, T1a (M), UL0, Ly0, V0, pHM-, pVM- (eCuraA) according to the 15th edition of Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed submucosal tumor, which was suspected as a swollen lymph node by CT and endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration revealed the recurrence of gastric cancer. We performed total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Postoperative pathological examination revealed no local recurrent tumor at the ESD site in the stomach. Swollen lymph node was diagnosed as metastasis and lymph node metastasis was limited near the cardia.ConclusionThis case provides valuable information about tumor with a minimum poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma component may develop lymph node metastasis even satisfying the guidelines criteria for curative resection.

The efficacy of the application of the curative criteria of the 5rd edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Background:The curative criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric carcinoma were updated by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. No study has shown promising results with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction based on the new curative criteria. The purpose of this study was to validate clinical efficacy of the application of the curative criteria of the 5th edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after endoscopic submucosal dissection.Methods:Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma between January 2013 and June 2018 were eligible for this study. Clinical and pathological features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using medical records.Results:The success rate for en-bloc resection was 97.2% (172/177) and the curative resection rate was 71.2% (126/177). Additional endoscopic submucosal dissection or radical surgery was conducted in 10 patients (5.6%) who did not fulfil the curative resection criteria, while one patient with curative resection remedied with endoscopic submucosal dissection because of recurrence. According to eCura scoring system, 94 patients (53.1%) were categorized into eCura A, 34 patients (19.2%) into eCura B, 11 patients (6.2%) into eCura C-1, and 38 patients (21.5%) into eCura C-2. Five patients categorized as eCura C-2 underwent radical surgery, two of whom have lymph node metastasis.Conclusions:Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction that met the expanded criteria of the 5th edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines were acceptable and should be the standard treatment instead of surgical resection.

Segmental gastrectomy with cardia preservation for early gastric cancer

Segmental gastrectomy with cardia preservation can reduce the symptoms of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and improve the quality of life, which is potentially advantageous among function-preserving gastrectomy procedures. However, due to the limited extent of excision, this procedure is classified as an investigational treatment in the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, without wide acceptance in clinical practice. It is generally believed that the surgical indication of segmental gastrectomy is more selected compared to the pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, and there are also differences between their therapeutic goals. The indications of cardia preservation in segmental gastrectomy mainly depend on the T stage, the distance of the resection margin and the metastasis of lymph nodes. Other points of segmental gastrectomy mainly include the scope of lymphadenectomy, the preservation of blood vessels and vagal nerves, which are still controversial in different researches. High-quality evidences are needed to confirm the safety and long-term efficacy of the segmental gastrectomy.

774 ENDOSCOPIC SURVEILLANCE INTERVAL MORE THAN 12 MONTHS IS A RISK OF GASTRIC CANCER WITH NON-CURATIVE ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION

Surveillance endoscopy must be performed for patients with a high risk of developing gastric cancer (GC). According to the 5th edition of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines (JGC-GL), they recommend performing surveillance endoscopy annually or twice a year for high risk patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the usefulness of surveillance endoscopy for the detection of early-stage gastric cancer and to verify the surveillance intervals of annual or twice a year. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 177 gastric cancer patients who previously underwent surveillance endoscopy at least two times at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. The average age of patient were 73.2 (26—93) years. The number of male and female was 131 and 46, respectively. The rate of severe atrophy was 88.0% (147/167). There were 5 uninfected, 34 current, and 132 past infection of Helicobacter pylori, respectively. There were 102 patients with a history of endoscopic resection (ER). The median size of GCs was 9.5 mm. There were 164 differentiated and 13 undifferentiated GCs, 161 mucosal, 14 submucosal, and 2 muscularis propria, respectively. 174 and 3 GCs were resected by ER and surgical resection, respectively. Among the ER cases, 160 were curative ER and 14 were non-curative ER cases due to submucosal invasion, lymph-vascular invasion, or positive margin. Among non-curative ER cases, 8 underwent additional surgical resection, and lymph node metastasis was found in 1 case (12.5%). The median endoscopic surveillance interval from the last endoscopy to the detection of gastric cancer in the curative ER cases was 12 months (5—177). The median interval in the non-curative ER cases and surgical resection cases with non-indication of ER was 14 months (10—63). The rate of patients who had endoscopic surveillance interval more than 12 months were significantly higher in the non-curative ER cases and surgical cases than those in curative ER cases (p=0.0029). Endoscopic surveillance interval more than 12 months identified as a risk factor in multivariate analysis (p=0.0174). Surveillance endoscopy should be performed within12 months to detect gastric cancer with curative ER. A multi-institutional prospective study is necessary to investigate the appropriate interval of surveillance endoscopy.

Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition)

Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition)