Jamming Stimulus Research Articles

Adaptive frequency shifts of echolocation sounds in Miniopterus fuliginosus according to the frequency-modulated pattern of jamming sounds.

When flying in a group, echolocating bats have to separate their own echoes from pulses and echoes belonging to other individuals to extract only the information necessary for their own navigation. Previous studies have demonstrated that frequency-modulated (FM) bats change the terminal frequencies (TFs) of downward FM pulses under acoustic interference. However, it is not yet clear which acoustic characteristics of the jamming signals induce the TF shift according to the degree of acoustic interference. In this study, we examined changes in the acoustic characteristics of pulses emitted by Miniopterus fuliginosus while presenting jamming stimuli with different FM patterns to the bat flying alone. Bats significantly altered their TFs when responding to downward (dExp) and upward (uExp) exponential FM sounds as well as to a constant-frequency (CF) stimulus, by approximately 1-2 kHz (dExp: 2.1±0.9 kHz; uExp: 1.7±0.3 kHz; CF: 1.3±0.4 kHz) but not for linear FM sounds. The feature common to the spectra of these three jamming stimuli is a spectrum peak near the TF frequency, demonstrating that the bats shift the TF to avoid masking of jamming sounds on the TF frequency range. These results suggest that direct frequency masking near the TF frequency range induces the TF shift, which simultaneously decreases the similarity between their own echolocation sounds and jamming signals.

Active acoustic interference elicits echolocation changes in heterospecific bats.

Echolocating bats often forage in the presence of both conspecific and heterospecific individuals, which have the potential to produce acoustic interference. Recent studies have shown that at least one bat species, the Brazilian free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis), produces specialized social signals that disrupt the sonar of conspecific competitors. We herein discuss the differences between passive and active jamming signals and test whether heterospecific jamming occurs in species overlapping spatiotemporally, as well as whether such interference elicits a jamming avoidance response. We compare the capture rates of tethered moths and the echolocation parameters of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) challenged with the playback of the jamming signal normally produced by Brazilian free-tailed bats and playback of deconstructed versions of this signal. There were no differences in the capture rates of targets with and without the jamming signal, although significant changes in both spectral and temporal features of the bats' echolocation were observed. These changes are consistent with improvements of the signal-to-noise ratio in the presence of acoustic interference. Accordingly, we propose to expand the traditional definition of the jamming avoidance response, stating that echolocation changes in response to interference should decrease similarity between the two signals, to include any change that increases the ability to separate returning echoes from active jamming stimuli originating from conspecific and heterospecific organisms. Flexibility in echolocation is an important characteristic for overcoming various forms of acoustic interference and may serve a purpose in interspecific interactions as well as intraspecific ones.

Adaptive changes in echolocation sounds byPipistrellus abramusin response to artificial jamming sounds

The echolocation behavior of Pipistrellus abramus during exposure to artificial jamming sounds during flight was investigated. Echolocation pulses emitted by the bats were recorded using a telemetry microphone mounted on the bats' backs, and their adaptation based on acoustic characteristics of emitted pulses was assessed in terms of jamming-avoidance responses (JARs). In experiment 1, frequency-modulated jamming sounds (3 ms duration) mimicking echolocation pulses of P. abramus were prepared. All bats showed significant increases in the terminal frequency of the frequency-modulated pulse by an average of 2.1-4.5 kHz when the terminal frequency of the jamming sounds was lower than the bats' own pulses. This frequency shift was not observed using jamming frequencies that overlapped with or were higher than the bats' own pulses. These findings suggest that JARs in P. abramus are sensitive to the terminal frequency of jamming pulses and that the bats' response pattern was dependent on the slight difference in stimulus frequency. In experiment 2, when bats were repeatedly exposed to a band-limited noise of 70 ms duration, the bats in flight more frequently emitted pulses during silent periods between jamming sounds, suggesting that the bats could actively change the timing of pulse emissions, even during flight, to avoid temporal overlap with jamming sounds. Our findings demonstrate that bats could adjust their vocalized frequency and emission timing during flight in response to acoustic jamming stimuli.

Closed-loop stabilization of the jamming avoidance response reveals its locally unstable and globally nonlinear dynamics

The Jamming Avoidance Response, or JAR, in the weakly electric fish has been analyzed at all levels of organization, from whole-organism behavior down to specific ion channels. Nevertheless, a parsimonious description of the JAR behavior in terms of a dynamical system model has not been achieved at least in part due to the fact that 'avoidance' behaviors are both intrinsically unstable and nonlinear. We overcame the instability of the JAR in Eigenmannia virescens by closing a feedback loop around the behavioral response of the animal. Specifically, the instantaneous frequency of a jamming stimulus was tied to the fish's own electrogenic frequency by a feedback law. Without feedback, the fish's own frequency diverges from the stimulus frequency, but appropriate feedback stabilizes the behavior. After stabilizing the system, we measured the responses in the fish's instantaneous frequency to various stimuli. A delayed first-order linear system model fitted the behavior near the equilibrium. Coherence to white noise stimuli together with quantitative agreement across stimulus types supported this local linear model. Next, we examined the intrinsic nonlinearity of the behavior using clamped frequency difference experiments to extend the model beyond the neighborhood of the equilibrium. The resulting nonlinear model is composed of competing motor return and sensory escape terms. The model reproduces responses to step and ramp changes in the difference frequency (df) and predicts a 'snap-through' bifurcation as a function of dF that we confirmed experimentally.

Behavioral responses to jamming and ‘phantom’ jamming stimuli in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia

The jamming avoidance response (JAR) of the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia is characterized by upward or downward shifts in electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency that are elicited by particular combinations of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) and differential phase modulation (DPM). However, non-jamming stimuli that consist of AM and/or DPM can elicit similar shifts in EOD frequency. We tested the hypothesis that these behavioral responses result from non-jamming stimuli being misperceived as jamming stimuli. Responses to non-jamming stimuli were similar to JARs as measured by modulation rate tuning, sensitivity, and temporal dynamics. There was a smooth transition between the magnitude of JARs and responses to stimuli with variable depths of AM or DPM, suggesting that frequency shifts in response to jamming and non-jamming stimuli represent different points along a continuum rather than categorically distinct behaviors. We also tested the hypothesis that non-jamming stimuli can elicit frequency shifts in natural contexts. Frequency decreases could be elicited by semi-natural AM stimuli, such as random AM, AM presented to a localized portion of the body surface, transient changes in amplitude, and movement of resistive objects through the electric field. We conclude that 'phantom' jamming stimuli can induce EOD frequency shifts in natural situations.

An Electrifying Memory

Electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency in the weakly electric brown ghost knife fish ( Apteronotus leptorhynchus ), which is set by the pacemaker nucleus (PMn, which contains pacemaker and relay neurons), increases in response to a similar frequency EOD or electronic stimulus (which jams the fish's electrosensory system). This jamming avoidance response (JAR) depends on activation of glutamatergic inputs to N -methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors on the relay neurons. Oestreich et al ., who previously described long-term frequency elevation (LTFE), a form of cellular memory in which EOD frequency remains increased for hours after a prolonged jamming stimulus, measured neural correlates of JAR and LTFE in response to afferent stimulation in PMn slices. The magnitude of LTFE depended on the total number of stimuli and not on stimulus frequency or pattern. Further, like LTFE induced by a brief tetanic burst, LTFE in response to prolonged low-frequency stimulation was sensitive to blockade of NMDA receptors. The N-type Ca 2+ channel blocker ω-conotoxin GVIA prevented initiation of JAR and LTFE without affecting basal firing frequency, whereas ω-conotoxin GVIA had no effect on established LTFE. This suggests that LTFE induction--but not its maintenance--depends on synaptic input. NMDA application also elicits LTFE (LTFE NMDA ), and the magnitude of LTFE NMDA was reduced by decreasing extracellular Ca 2+ concentration. Stimulus-induced LTFE and LTFE NMDA were both sensitive to blockade of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels; moreover, TRPM5, which is activated by intracellular Ca 2+ , was cloned from PMn RNA and localized to pacemaker and relay neurons by in situ hybridization. Thus, the authors propose that LTFE occurs in the PMn and that, although it is initiated by synaptic input, its maintenance depends on Ca 2+ -dependent activation of TRP channels and the ensuing neuronal depolarization. J. Oestreich, N. C. Dembrow, A. A. George, H. H. Zakon, A "sample-and-hold" pulse-counting integrator as a mechanism for graded memory underlying sensorimotor adaptation. Neuron 49 , 577-588 (2006). [PubMed]

Species-specific differences in sensorimotor adaptation are correlated with differences in social structure

Here, we report a species difference in the strength and duration of long-term sensorimotor adaptation in the electromotor output of weakly electric fish. The adaptation is produced by changes in intrinsic excitability in the electromotor pacemaker nucleus; this change is a form of memory that correlates with social structure. A weakly electric fish may be jammed by a similar electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency of another fish and prevents jamming by transiently raising its own emission frequency, a behavior called the jamming avoidance response (JAR). The JAR requires activation of NMDA receptors, and prolonged JAR performance results in long-term frequency elevation (LTFE) of a fish's EOD frequency for many hours after the jamming stimulus. We find that LTFE is stronger in a shoaling species (Eigenmannia virescens) with a higher probability of encountering jamming conspecifics, when compared to a solitary species (Apteronotus leptorhynchus). Additionally, LTFE persists in Eigenmannia, whereas, it decays over 5-9 h in Apteronotus.

Structural and functional organization of a diencephalic sensory‐motor interface in the gymnotiform fish, Eigenmannia

The diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) of gymnotiform fish comprises a series of finely tuned neuronal filters for control of the jamming avoidance response (JAR) and probably other electromotor tasks as well. The nE receives electrosensory input from the dorsal torus semicircularis (TSd) and octavolateral input from the ventral torus (TSv). The nE, in turn, projects to various hypothalamic and thalamic nuclei, including the prepacemaker nucleus (PPn), which can modulate the frequency of electric organ discharges (EODs) via its unique input to the medullary pacemaker nucleus. Four subdivisions of the nE can now be recognized: 1) The beat-related area (nEb)--a rostral cluster of tightly packed cells which receives TSd input and projects to the inferior lobe, anterior tuberal nucleus, anterior thalamic nucleus, central posterior thalamic nucleus, and PPn. The nEb contains neurons responsive to beat patterns caused by jamming stimuli. Stimulation of the nEb with L-glutamate, however, fails to induce any EOD-frequency shift. 2) The area causing EOD-frequency rises (nE increases)--a horizontal band of cells at the dorsal aspect of the caudal nE which receives TSd input and projects to the PPn and vicinity and to the cerebellum; nE increases stimulation induces slow EOD-frequency rises characteristic of the JAR. Responses of these cells to jamming stimuli are not yet known. 3) The area causing EOD-frequency falls (nE decreases)--a horizontal band of cells at the ventral aspect of the caudal nE which receives TSd input and projects only to the PPn and vicinity; nE decreases stimulation induces slow EOD-frequency falls characteristic of the JAR. The responses of these cells to jamming stimuli are not yet known. 4) The acousticolateral region (nEar)--a complex medial region of the nE which receives input predominantly from the ventral torus and projects to the inferior lobe, anterior tuberal nucleus, central posterior thalamic nucleus, PPn, and cerebellum; the sensory and motor properties of this region are not known in detail, although auditory and mechanosensory responses have been recorded here. Projections to the PPn and its vicinity suggest direct control of electromotor behaviors by the nE, whereas thalamic and hypothalamic projections may provide a substrate for electrosensory influences on neuroendocrine and motivational control centers. The optic tectum projects strongly to the pretectum and various other diencephalic nuclei in the vicinity of the nE, but it does not innervate the nE itself. Accordingly, ablation of the tectum does not affect the performance of the JAR.

From distributed sensory processing to discrete motor representations in the diencephalon of the electric fish,Eigenmannia

During their jamming avoidance response (JAR), weakly electric fish of the genus Eigenmannia shift their electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency away from a similar EOD frequency of a neighboring fish. The behavioral rules and neural substrates for stimulus recognition and motor control of the JAR have been extensively studied (see review by Heiligenberg 1986). The diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) links sensory processing within the torus semicircularis and optic tectum with the mesencephalic prepacemaker nucleus which, in turn, modulates the medullary pacemaker nucleus and hence the EOD frequency. Two separate areas within the nE responsible for JAR-related EOD frequency rises and frequency falls, respectively, were identified by iontophoresis of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate. Bilateral lesion of the areas causing EOD frequency rises resulted in elimination of JAR-related frequency rises above a baseline frequency obtained in the absence of a jamming stimulus. Similarly, bilateral lesion of the areas causing frequency falls resulted in a loss of JAR-related frequency falls below the baseline frequency. Whether these areas are also responsible for non-JAR-related frequency shifts is not known. The strength of response and spatial extent of the areas causing frequency shifts varied among fish and also varied in individual fish, reflecting the strength of JAR-related frequency shifts and the balance of activities in frequency-rise and frequency-fall areas. Local application of bicuculline-methiodide or GABA demonstrated a tonic inhibitory input to each area and suggests a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the two ipsilateral areas, possibly accounting for much of the individual plasticity. The nE thus is a site for neuronal transformation from distributed, topographically organized processing within the laminated structures of the torus and tectum to discrete cell clusters which control antagonistic motor responses.

'Recognition units' at the top of a neuronal hierarchy? Prepacemaker neurons in Eigenmannia code the sign of frequency differences unambiguously.

The electric fish, Eigenmannia, is able to discriminate the sign of the frequency difference, Df, between a neighbor's electric organ discharges (EODs) and its own. The fish lowers its EOD frequency for positive Dfs and raises its frequency for negative Dfs to minimize jamming of its electrolocation ability by a neighbor's EODs of similar frequency. This jamming avoidance response (JAR) is controlled by a group of 'sign-selective' neurons in the prepacemaker nucleus (PPN) that is located at the boundary of the midbrain and the diencephalon (Fig. 1). Extracellular recordings from a total of 35 neurons revealed a great similarity between behavioral and neuronal response properties: 1. All neurons fired vigorously for negative Dfs and were almost silent for positive Dfs, regardless of the orientation of the jamming stimulus, and thus discriminated the sign of Df unambiguously (Fig. 2). 2. In accordance with behavioral observations, individual neurons failed to discriminate the sign of Df when the jamming stimulus had the same field geometry as the signal mimicking the animal's own EOD (Fig. 3). 3. Df magnitudes which evoke strongest JARs, usually 4 to 8 Hz, also induced most vigorous responses in sign-selective neurons (Fig. 5). 4. Behavioral and neuronal thresholds for the detection of small jamming signals were similar. Threshold for sign selectivity was reached when the amplitude ratio of the jamming signal to the EOD mimic, measured near the head surface, was 0.001. This value corresponds to a maximal temporal disparity (a necessary cue for performing a correct JAR) of 1 to 2 microseconds for signals received by the two sides of the body in a transverse jamming field (Fig. 7). 5. The effects of two jamming fields, offered orthogonally to each other, may interact nonlinearly at the behavioral as well as at the neuronal level. A positive Df presented in one field may suppress behavioral and neuronal responses to modulations of the sign of Df in the other field (Fig. 8c).

Stimulus discrimination in the diencephalon ofEigenmannia: the emergence and sharpening of a sensory filter

Neuronal reliability and sensitivity to behaviorally relevant stimulus patterns were investigated in a higher-order nucleus of the diencephalon believed to participate in the jamming avoidance response (JAR) of the weakly electric fish, Eigenmannia. The fish raises or lowers its frequency of electric organ discharge (EOD) to minimize interference from a neighboring fish's EOD. Proper JARs require determination of the sign of the difference frequency (Df) between the neighboring fish's EOD and the fish's own EOD. Bastian and Yuthas (1984) recently described diencephalic neurons within the nucleus electrosensorius that are able to make this determination. In the present study, response properties of such neurons were compared with those of lower-level 'sign-selective' cells found in the torus semicircularis and the optic tectum (Heiligenberg and Rose 1985) as well as with properties of the intact behavior. Most sign-selective cells within the nucleus electrosensorius show a high degree of selectivity for one sign of the difference frequency; cells with either sign preference were found in approximately equal numbers. The sign preference and the degree of sign selectivity is most often independent of the spatial orientation of the jamming stimulus. In contrast, the responses of toral and tectal cells are less robust and consistent and are often highly dependent on the geometry of the jamming stimulus. Determination of the sign of the difference frequency requires the analysis of amplitude modulations coupled with modulations in phase (timing) differences between pairs of areas of the body surface. The most sensitive cells recorded in the nucleus electrosensorius can determine the sign of the difference frequency with timing differences of 1 microsecond or less, roughly comparable to the behavioral threshold of 400 ns (Carr et al. 1986). The best toral/tectal response required at least a 16 microseconds modulation. Cells within the nucleus electrosensorius thus code the sign of Df with a high degree of reliability and sensitivity. Ambiguities persist, however, which suggest that single cells at this level cannot completely account for the behavioral discrimination. Additional processing may be necessary to transform a still primarily sensory code into a motor program for control of the JAR (Rose et al. 1988).

The Sexually Dimorphic Jamming Avoidance Response in the Electric Fish Eigenmannia (Teleostei, Gymnotiformes)

ABSTRACT Eigenmannia’s, jamming avoidance response (JAR) is a frequency change of its electric organ discharge (EOD) in response to an electric stimulus of similar frequency (small ΔF; ΔF = FFish – FStim). It is assumed that the response to an unclamped stimulus, ΔR = FResponse – FRest, is stereotyped and non-habituating, and improves the fish’s electrolocation performance in the presence of a jamming stimulus, such as the EOD of a nearby conspecific. Adult females gravid with eggs (N = 3) gave good responses (frequency decrease of at least 3 Hz) to – ΔF (stimulus frequency higher than fish frequency), but no response or only weak responses (<0·5 Hz) to + ΔF (stimulus frequency lower than fish frequency). After 2·75 years, a sexually mature female still showed the same behaviour, whereas an immature female (see below) had changed its behaviour considerably on becoming sexually mature. Large males (N = 4) did not give JARs to +ΔF, and no JARs or only weak ones to – ΔF (| ΔR| < 0·7 Hz). Increasing the stimulus intensity by +10 or +20 dB did not change this result. After 2·5 years, two large males were still found to be almost unresponsive. However, large males gave rapid frequency modulations (‘short rises’ and ‘interruptions’), which have been described from threatening fish likely to attack, even at the weakest stimulus intensity. One group of juveniles (N=4; probably females) gave only a weak increase in frequency (AR <0 ·9 Hz) in response to +ΔF but a strong frequency decrease (|ΔR|>2Hz) in response to –ΔF. Another group of juveniles (N=4; probably males) gave strongest responses (ΔR >3 Hz) to ΔF = 0Hz. In these juveniles, the ‘equilibrium point’ of no response was at ΔF ≈ – 0·6 Hz to – 1Hz instead of at ΔF = 0 Hz. They thus increased, rather than decreased, their EOD frequency even at small – ΔFs, which would have been more economical. A decrease in frequency was weaker than an increase. A significant frequency change could even be elicited by stimuli of ΔF = 0 Hz that are phase-locked to the EOD. The accuracy of assessment of ΔF, as determined in juvenile fish giving good + ΔRs and – ΔRs, was not better than ±0·3 Hz (at ΔF = – 0·6 Hz). The JAR showed strong habituation. Dedicated to Professor Kurt Fiedler on his 60th birthday. None of the 14 fish showed a frequency difference vs response curve close to optimal for the purpose of jamming avoidance. An alternative function of the JAR in social communication is considered.

Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: behavior.

Electrolocation behavior of Apteronotus leptorhynchus was studied by monitoring the animal's ability to maintain orientation to a variety of moving electrolocation targets. The primary goal of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of various types of electrical 'jamming signals' in disrupting electrolocation performance. 1. Two measures of electrolocation performance were used: The latency between the electrolocation target motion and the fish's following response, and the minimum distance separating the fish from the target during the target movement sequence. Latency increased and minimum fish-target distance decreased as target size was decreased, and when large diameter ceramic targets were used as control stimuli the fish were less able to avoid, and frequently collided with, these 'electrically transparent' objects. 2. Four types of jamming signals were used in attempts to mask the electrosensory input used for electrolocation. Broad-band noise and sinusoidal signals, different in frequency by a few Hz from the animal's personal electric organ discharge (DF stimuli), were used to jam the tuberous electroreceptors. Five Hz and 50 Hz sinusoidal signals were used to jam the low-frequency or ampullary receptor system. Both the noise and the DF stimuli were effective in reducing electrolocation performance, and the threshold intensity for behavior deterioration was about three-fold lower for DF stimuli as compared to the noise. The rate of change of response deterioration as a function of increasing jamming intensity was, however, not different for these two types of stimuli. Neither the 50 Hz nor the 5 Hz jamming signals caused electrolocation deterioration when presented alone. However, 5 Hz jamming, when added to either the noise or DF jamming, did result in significant increments in response deterioration. This suggests that the ampullary receptors can provide supplementary information for electrolocation. 3. Electrolocation performance deterioration was also studied with various difference frequencies between an animal's EOD and the sinusoidal jamming stimulus. Increasing DF results in decreased electrolocation deterioration, but even at the highest DF frequencies used (128 Hz) significant response degradation was observed. 4. The apparent differences in the effectiveness of noise and DF stimulation in reducing electrolocation performance are largely accounted for by the differential effects of the tuberous electroreceptor filter characteristics on these two types of signals.

Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: electroreceptor physiology

Responses of ampullary and tuberous electroreceptor afferents were studied using moving electrolocation targets and electrical modulations of the animal's electric organ discharge as stimuli. The ability of the electroreceptors to encode these stimuli was measured with and without various forms of electrical jamming signals. The goal of this study was to measure the deterioration in electroreceptor responses due to the jamming signals, and to compare these results with the behavioral measures of electrolocation under the same conditions of jamming as described in the preceding report (Bastian 1987). 1. Three types of jamming stimuli were used to interfere with the tuberous electroreceptor afferents' ability to respond to the test stimuli mentioned above: Broad-band noise, high frequency stimuli consisting of a sinusoidal waveform having a frequency maintained at a chosen difference frequency (DF) from the EOD frequency of the fish being studied, and 5 or 50 Hz sinusoidal stimuli. 2. The tuberous receptor afferents' spontaneous frequency was sensitive to continuous presentation of all but the 5 Hz jamming signals. The 4 Hz DF signal caused the largest increase in spontaneous activity, the 50 Hz stimulus was intermediate in effectiveness, and the noise stimulus caused the smallest increase. Estimates of the variability of the ongoing receptor activity were also made, and both the 4 Hz DF and the 50 Hz stimuli reduced the coefficient of variation of the receptor activity, but noise had no significant effect on this parameter. Noise, 4 Hz DF, and 50 Hz jamming signals also reduced the tuberous receptors' responses to a 100 ms EOD amplitude modulation, and the 5 Hz stimulus was again ineffective. 3. Noise and 4 Hz DF jamming were also effective in reducing tuberous receptor afferents' responses to a moving metal electrolocation target. The 4 Hz DF stimulus was most effective in reducing the receptor's ability to encode information about the target. Receptor responses showed about a three-fold larger decrease per 10 dB increase in DF jamming amplitude as compared to similar sized increases in noise amplitude. Threshold target distances were also determined with and without noise and DF jamming, and again, the noise stimulus was less effective in reducing the distance at which electrolocation targets were just detectable. 4. Recordings from ampullary receptor afferents confirmed that the galvanic potentials produced by metal electrolocation targets stimulate these receptors while EOD distortions caused by such objects probably do not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Processing information carried in a high frequency wave: Properties of cerebellar units in a high frequency electric fish

The mode of processing information in the electrosensory system of the South American weakly electric fishApteronotus albifrons (Gymnotoidae) was investigated at the level of the cerebellum. Single unit recordings were made with the fish immobilized with FlaxedilŖ and the response of the neurons to a moving object was monitored with and without “jamming”. As a jamming stimulus a sinusoidally modulated voltage with a frequency close to the fish's ownelectricorgandischarge (EOD) frequency was introduced into the experimental tank by means of two silverplate electrodes straddling the fish's body. The stimulus was frequency-clamped to the EOD to maintain a constant frequency difference (δF:=Ffish-Fstim) between the two signals. The response to the object deteriorates for δF frequencies >0 to about 10Hz to reappear at δF frequencies above 10 Hz (Fig. 3). The correlation of theaveragedresponsehistograms (ARH) of the “jammed” case with the undisturbed ARH reveals that the correlation coefficients are lowest when the clamped (=fish cannot escape jamming stimulus frequency) “jammingavoidanceresponse” (JAR) is highest (Fig. 4). In a second series of experiments (Figs. 5, 6) the response of the cerebellar units to the jamming stimulus alone shows that at the cerebellar level the system behaves like a band pass filter with a sharp cutoff between 0 Hz and 1 Hz and a less steep roll off towards 10 Hz, the 3 dB point being around 7 Hz. A model is proposed, showing that the information conveyed in amplitude or phase modulations of the high frequency carrier — the EOD — is converted by the receptors, which are tuned to the carrier frequency, into a frequency modulated spike train traveling along the primary afferent fibers and recovered by subsequent low frequency band pass filters at different stations in the CNS (the posterior lateral line lobe, an unknown intermediate and the cerebellum) (Fig. 8). The model suggests that the significance of the JAR is to shift the “low frequency noise”, i.e., the amplitude and phase fluctuations introduced by the jamming signal out of the pass band of the cerebellar units into a range where these units are insensitive to it. A comparison with the processing of auditory signals suggests that the mode of processing electrosensory information might be a general scheme for both modalities having the advantage of dealing with only one frequency and therefore being a useful tool to investigate all central aspects of extraction of features carried in a high frequency signal.