350 SEER, 8i, 2, 2003 immediate eastern neighbours. For the Anglophone reader Davies's and Moorhouse's work will open a very large window on the complex yet fascinating world of Central Europe, made even more compelling by their exertions. Abingdon School W. H. ZAWADZKI Schmitt,OliverJens. Dasvenezianische Albanien (I392-I479). SudosteuropaischeArbeiten , Ii o. R. Oldenbourg, Munich, 2001 . 70I pp. Maps. Notes. Appendix. Bibliography.Index. C69.8o. TWENTY years afterAlain Ducellier published his massiveLafafademaritime de l'Albanie. Durazzoet Valona duXIe auXVesiecle(Thessaloniki, I98I), a worthy and no less substantial sequel has been supplied by Oliver Jens Schmitt. Ducellier's book, despite its title, made little attemptto penetrate the fifteenth century;in dealing with politics, it emphasized the ties between Albania and the kingdom of Naples, and in dealing with trade it made heavy use of the archivesof Dubrovnik. Schmitt'sbook isbased on Venetian evidence, but like Ducellier he aimsto encompass a verywide range of topics.Thus he examines the Albanian aristocracy, homing in on noble families such as the Balshi, Thopia and Kastriota, whose outside ties, whether to the Serbs, the Neapolitans or the Ottomans, greatly affected the political evolution of the Albanian lands. He also passes under review, though briefly, the merchants who were present at Shkoder and other trading centres; and he has useful comments on the smaller towns and villages as well their economy, population, administration,as part of the Venetian overseas empire. Particularly notable is his analysis of the town statutes of Shkoder, based on a manuscriptin the Museo Correrin Venice. (Itis, however, a pity that he does not make more use of the physical evidence provided by the Rozafat citadel that stillsurvivesoverlookingShkoder).This leads him to presentan image of Albania under Venetian rule in which peoples, languages and religions coexisted and even intermingled, with speakers of Albanian, Dalmatian, Italian, and Slavonic tongues doing business together as they traded in fish, salt and other basic foodstuffs.His concern is with the period between the Venetian acquisition of Shkoder (Scutari) in the aftermath of the battle of Kossovo/Kosova and its loss as Ottoman power in Albania was steadily enforced, notwithstandingthe rearguardmovement led by Skanderbeg. There is thus much new and carefully digested material in this book. Inevitably, Schmitt covers some ground that is reasonablyfamiliar.On trade, he often relies on the work of Ducellier and Hrabak, based on the Ragusan archives. However, he does mobilize effectively the mass of information contained in Valentini'sActaAlbaniae Veneta (25 vols, Munich/Palermo/Milan, 1967-75). This is also the major source for his account of the political relationshipbetween Venice and the Albanian coast, the subjectof Ioo pages of variabledensity:he providesmuch detail on the earliestphases, but in later decades his discussion is too rapid and too lightly footnoted. Although he is anxious to place Skanderbegin the wider context of Venetian relationswith Albania, he explains less fully the intimate ties linking Skanderbeg to the REVIEWS 35I Neapolitan court, or how the politics of Italy in the era of the Peace of Lodi and the Congress of Mantua influenced the attitude of Venice towards the Turks. Yet he distances himself from some earlier, Albanian, historiography which predictably cast Skanderbegas the national hero defending Shqiperia against Italian imperialism (the Venetians occupying the role of Mussolini's Fascists here). Albanian scholarship on the Venetian presence in Albania culminated in L. Malltezi's Qytet e bregdetit shqiptar gjatM sundimit venedikas ('The Albanian Coastal Cities under Venetian Domination', Tirana, I988); and a great virtue of Schmitt's book is his review of existing literatureon medieval Albania, includingitemsthatremainvirtuallyinaccessiblein westernlibraries. Schmitt is unduly modest about the significance of his work. He contends that 'Venice's commercial interest lay not in Albania, but in the Levant' (p. 222). While no one would deny that the galleyfleetsbound forAlexandria were the glory of Venetian commerce, it is also clearfrom Schmitt'sworkthat the Adriatic was much more than a route to the East. For he also observes (p. 242) that the loss of Dalmatia to the Hungarians in 1350 created a crisis for Venice: the lack of secure harbours in the Middle Adriatic made the acquisition of dominion in northernAlbania especiallyvaluable. In addition, the goods to be acquired there, though modest...
Read full abstract