In this dialogic intervention, we discuss the multiple dimensions of forgetting in Italian history and historiography through both temporal and geographical lenses. To do so, we begin by exploring issues of memory and "strategic” forgetfulness (Del Boca 2002; Favero 2010), arguing that forgetting is not merely a neutral and passive act, but rather a generative process embedded within dynamics of race, gender, class, and space. Starting with the temporal dimension, we discuss Charles Mills’s concept of “white ignorance” (2007), which underlines the ways “collective memory” has been used and manipulated to forge racialized national identities and to selectively forget the colonial past and (by extension) the war crimes committed by Europeans during the colonial invasion of Africa. Within this framework, ignorance, rather than representing absence, serves an ideological function and is used to create oblivion through selective forms of cultural remembrance. In the case of Italy, certain stories of Italian colonial and racial violence (as well as anticolonial and antiracist resistance) have been excluded from the domain of mainstream knowledge production, resulting in the perpetuation and transmission of dominant master narratives based on white, Eurocentric, and colonial ideas of “knowledge.” We also analyze memory and forgetting from a geographical perspective, considering the ways memory and forgetting become embedded in physical places such as monuments, street names, and spatial arrangements. Additionally, the production of historical amnesia functions through the active forgetting of the deep and layered connections that link Italy to the broader global circuits of colonial racial capitalism, as well as transnational resistance. This conversation encourages the exploration of alternative ways of knowing within an epistemological framework of resistance and will promote the use of memories and “subjugated knowledges” (Foucault, 1980) as powerful multidimensional counternarratives for challenging crystallized and selective notions of hegemonic historical memory.
Read full abstract