The Seongju Peasant’s Struggle in 1862, according to a very concise report by the Country’s Officer, it was an ordinary process among numerous incidents at the time. Then, when I discovered a material called 『Byeonmurok』 written by a person named Seo Taek-hyeon a former yibang(吏房), the content became very rich. He wrote this article because his house was destroyed in the conflict between between Local Official Class. Although it is an individual’s Works. it is helpful in understanding the development process of the Seongju Uprising and the trends within the Local Official Class(邑吏層). Furthermore, it is also very important that the eupri personally wrote their rituals, behaviors, terms, etc. naturally.<BR> In Seongju in 1862, along with the influence of Jinju, which occurred earlier, there was a protest under the pretext of correcting the 12 articles. However, the mainstream Bae clan, led by Bae Sul-ho, a former yibang(吏房) in Seongju county, and Yoo Young-ha, who supported him, were attributed to Seo Taek-hyeon, who was connected to the protest leader(狀頭), who provided ‘Eubpye 12 Articles(邑弊12條)’, attacked him and destroyed the house, complaining about injustice. To this end, Seo Taek-hyeon wrote 『Byeonmurok』 and protested.<BR> ‘Correcting the 12 Articles(邑弊12條)’ was brief and well organized. According to this, it can be seen that there are evils throughout the Seongju Tax Administration. In addition, it can be seen that Seongju’s divergence is very large through 『Byunmurok』 and the appeal of Lee Won-jo. In the end, in order to resolve the dissatisfaction of the townspeople in Seongju and to manage the township well, there was no choice but to change the current management method of the township centered on Bae Sul-ho. On the other hand, external conditions also had an influence on this. The Bae Sul-ho system, which was maintained despite the 1st and 2nd protests in Seongju in 1862, was significantly overthrown by the central government inspectorate who could no longer neglect the police issue in 1864. It was eventually destroyed by the punishment of Yeong-eup(營邑) again in 1868.<BR> As a result, the Bae clan suffered a heavy blow. With this, it can be considered that the case that occurred in 1862 following the abolition of the Eupri Class was completed one step. On the other hand, Seo Taek-hyeon, who had been targeted by them, survived, and new powers took on important posts.<BR> Although it is already known that there were conflicts and fights over the position within the Local Official Class, it can be inferred that the Seongju case has a tendency to challenge the forces that seek to weaken or improve exploitation over ‘social issues’. After that, there were changes in the management of the Local Officer Class(邑吏) of Seongju, and it led to various incidents surrounding the appointment of yibang(吏房) in the 1880-1890s.
Read full abstract