Primary Care Issues Research Articles

Nociplastic pain and associated functional disorders: Update, diagnostic tools, and communication strategies for the general practitioner

Nociplastic pain and associated non-pain symptoms are frequent health issues in primary care. Professionals may feel apprehensive about their management and face challenges due to the complexity and chronicity of the somatopsychic conditions. A thorough understanding of nociplastic mechanisms, associated clinical elements, and the biopsychosocial model are necessary for individualized evaluation, identifying affected patients, selecting dedicated treatments to desensitize the central nervous system, and building a solid partnership between the patient and the clinician.

Exploring the Discriminant Validity of the Modified Arm Care Screen (MACS), Designed for Overhead Athletes, in Detecting Musculoskeletal Risk Factors in the General Population

Background: Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal issue in primary care, affecting up to 50% of patients six months post-consultation, leading to significant functional impairments and societal costs, especially due to sick leave. Shoulder injuries are particularly prevalent among ‘overhead athletes’ in sports like swimming, volleyball, and handball, with high injury rates reported annually. Screening tools like the Arm Care Screen (ACS) have been used to effectively identify athletes at risk of shoulder injuries. However, their applicability to the general population is less understood. This study aimed to assess the discriminant validity of a modified ACS (MACS) in detecting musculoskeletal risk factors among non-athletes. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 asymptomatic subjects over 18, excluding those with a history of shoulder injuries or surgeries. The MACS, comprising four tests, was administered, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Results: The results indicated low sensitivity (0–47.62%) and variable specificity (55.56–100%), suggesting that the MACS may not effectively identify risk factors in the general population. Positive and negative predictive values were inconsistent (ranging from 0 to 100), as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios (ranging from 0 to 3.47), highlighting the need for non-athlete-specific screening tools. Conclusion: While the MACS shows promise in athletes, its application in the general population requires further refinement. This study underscores the necessity for tailored screening methods to enhance the early detection and prevention of musculoskeletal issues in diverse populations.

Survey of GP registrars' training experience and confidence in managing children and adolescents with mental health conditions in primary care.

The aim of thisstudy is to assess General Practitioner (GP) trainees' training experience, and confidence in assessing and managing children and adolescents with common mental health conditions in primary care in Ireland. An online anonymous questionnaire was distributed to third and fourth year GP registrars enrolled in the Irish College of General Practitioners training schemes. The online questionnaire evaluated participants' training experiences and confidence levels in key areas of child and adolescent mental health in primary care. Sixty participants completed the survey out of 406, yielding a response rate of 14.8%. The majority (88%) reported no formal training or experience working in Child and Adolescent Mental Healthcare Services (CAMHS) during their GP training scheme. Responses indicated that many participants rated their competency, skills, and knowledge in essential areas of Child and Adolescent Mental Health as needing improvement. Similarly, their awareness of referral pathways and specialty services was below expectations, with poor perceived access to services. A large proportion (91.7%) expressed a definite need for further training in child and adolescent mental health disorders. The results highlight the need for enhanced training and support for GP trainees in the field of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, ensuring their ability to effectively and confidently address these common issues in primary care.

Nursing diagnoses related to cardiovascular function in primary care: A scoping review: Diagnósticos de enfermagem relacionados a função cardiovascular na atenção primária: Scoping review.

To map nursing diagnoses related to cardiovascular function reported in studies involving patients in primary care. A scoping review follows JBI guidelines. Literature searches were conducted from March to May 2024. Studies included focused on nursing diagnoses for adults and older adult patients with cardiovascular conditions in primary care settings. Results were systematically presented in tables and narratively. Among the 12 included studies, the most prevalent diagnosis was "noncompliance" (00079), removed from NANDA-I in 2017. Sixteen other diagnoses were identified, indicating a broader clinical profile of individuals with cardiovascular health issues in primary care. Most studies involved patients with hypertension in Brazil. Key nursing diagnoses for patients with cardiovascular conditions in primary care were identified. Ineffective health management emerged as a common characteristic among this population. Identifying prevalent diagnoses allows nurses to reinforce their commitment to managing cardiovascular conditions, improve care plans, and generate practice indicators for services, thus enhancing the quality of care provided.

The Role of Physicians in Approaching Mental Health Issues in Primary Care

The Role of Physicians in Approaching Mental Health Issues in Primary Care

Can Puborectalis Muscle and Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Thickness Indicate Dyssynergic Defecation?

Introduction: Chronic constipation (CC) is a common issue in primary care and gastroenterology. Defined variably by patients and clinicians, CC per Rome III criteria requires symptoms for six months, present three or more days per month for three months. Dyssynergic defecation (DD), a functional constipation type, involves the failure of pelvic floor muscles to relax during defecation. This study examines the relationship between DD, puborectalis muscle thickness, and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness via MR defecography. Material and Method: After ethical approval, MR defecography images of 110 patients from Ankara Bilkent City Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Exclusions included pelvic floor descensus, rectal mass, cystocele, rectocele, or movement artifacts. The study comprised 52 DD patients and 52 matched controls. Measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue at L5-S1 and puborectalis muscle thickness were performed on T2-weighted images. Results: DD patients had significantly higher abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue and puborectalis muscle thickness than controls (p=0.021, p=0.001). No significant gender differences were noted. ROC analysis revealed cut-off values of 23 mm for adipose tissue and 4.8 mm for puborectalis muscle thickness. Positive predictive values for DD were 62% for adipose tissue >23 mm, 74% for puborectalis muscle thickness >4.8 mm, and 90% for both criteria. Discussion: MR defecography is essential for diagnosing DD. This study is the first to investigate the link between DD and puborectalis muscle thickness. Increased abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue suggests a connection between DD and obesity, possibly due to increased intra-abdominal pressure leading to higher puborectalis muscle tone. Conclusion: Puborectalis muscle thickness >4.8 mm and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness >23 mm are key parameters for diagnosing DD in MR defecography. These findings underscore the importance of MR defecography in diagnosing and understanding DD, leading to more precise and individualized treatments.

Experiences and observations from a care point for displaced Ukrainians: a community case study in Antwerp, Belgium.

A total of 7,307 Ukrainian refugees moved to Antwerp, Belgium, during the study period (01 April 2022 to 31 December 2022). The city's administration set up three care centers where these people were introduced to the Belgian primary care system, a medical file was created, and acute/preventive/chronic care was delivered. This community case study analyzes the organization and contents of care and reflects upon its meaning for the mainstream healthcare system. This is an observational study using routine electronic medical record data to measure the uptake of care. For a sample of 200 subjects, a retrospective chart review was conducted. All refugees with a medical file at one of the three participating care centers were included. For the observational study, 2,261 patients were reached (30% of the potential users), and 6,450 contacts were studied. The nurses (including midwives) conducted 4,929 out of 6,450 (76%) of all consultations, while the general practitioners (GPs) conducted 1,521 out of 6,450 (24%). Of the nurse consultations, 955 (19%) were followed by another nurse consultation and 866 (18%) by a GP consultation. In the structured case reviews, most contacts were concerned with acute problems (609 out of 1,074, 57%). The most prevalent reasons for encounters and diagnoses were typical primary care issues. The nurses were able to manage half of the cases independently (327, 55%), referred 37% (217) of cases to the GP, and consulted a GP (live, by telephone, or a dedicated app) for 8% (48) of cases. GPs mostly prescribed drugs, referred to a medical specialist, and advised over-the-counter drugs, while nurses more often advised over-the-counter drugs (mostly paracetamol, nose sprays, and anti-inflammatory drugs), provided non-medical advice, or ordered laboratory tests. The medical care points delivered mostly typical acute primary care in this first phase, with a key role for nurses. The care points did not sufficiently take up chronic diseases and mental health problems. These results will inform policymakers on the use of primary care centers for newly arriving patients in times of a large influx. A nurse-first model seems feasible and efficient, but evaluation of safety and quality of care is needed. Once the acute phase of this crisis fades away, questions about the comprehensiveness, continuity, and integration of care for migrants remain relevant.

Health issues in primary care during hot weather periods

Health issues in primary care during hot weather periods

Quality of heart failure registration in primary care: observations from 1 million electronic health records in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area.

Proper coding of heart failure (HF) in electronic health records (EHRs) is an important prerequisite for adequate care and research towards this vulnerable patient population. We set out to evaluate the accuracy of registration of HF diagnoses in primary care EHRs. In a routine primary care database covering the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area, we identified all episodes of care with International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) codes K77 (decompensatio cordis) or K84.03 (cardiomyopathy) up to 31/12/2021. We also performed two text-based searches toidentify HF episodes without an appropriate ICPC-code. Anexpert panel evaluated all ICPC and text matches for congruence between the assigned codes and notes. From a database of 968,433 records we identified 19,106 patients (2.0 %) with a total of 24,011 ICPC-coded HF episodes. Removal of 1,324 episodes found to concern other or uncertain diagnoses and inclusion of 4,582 validated HF episodes identified through text search led to exclusion of 909 (overregistration: 4.8 %) and inclusion of 2,266 additional patients (underregistration: 11.1 %). The inclusion of miscoded HF episodes advanced the first known date of HFdiagnosis in 3.9 % of records, with a median shift of 3.45 years. Episode-level underregistration decreased significantly over time, from 23.8 % in 2006 to 10.0 % in 2021. While there is improvement over time, there are still substantial levels of over- and underregistration ofHF, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation ofICPC-coded data. The findings contribute to the understanding of HF registration issues in primary care and provide insights for improving registration practices.

Exploring factors associated with healthcare professionals’ subjective perceptions of complex issues in primary care in Japan: a self-administered survey study on confidence, satisfaction and burden levels

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore factors associated with healthcare professionals’ subjective perceptions of complex issues in primary care settings in Japan.DesignCross-sectional survey conducted through a self-administered web-based...

Patient Complexity in Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics in Ontario

Aim: To assess the level of complexity of patients in Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics (NPLCs).
 Background: Complexity has emerged as a key issue in primary health care. There is no easily accessible dataset to evaluate the level of complexity and needs of their patients in this clinic model.
 Methods: NPs at four NPLCs assessed patients during the study period with the PCAM, which is a reliable and valid tool that is used to evaluate physical and biopsychosocial elements contributing to complexity. A total of 677 PCAM evaluations were completed which were analyzed to determine the level of complexity of patients in NPLCs.
 Findings: The results showed that patients with the highest complexity are those with high social/economic needs: low education; low income; low levels of employment.
 Conclusions: These results demonstrate the potential positive impact of an interdisciplinary team and may inform changes to the allocation of resources in the clinic settings.

COVID-19 Disruption To Routine Health Care Services: How 8 Latin American And Caribbean Countries Responded.

Latin America and the Caribbean was one of the regions hardest hit globally by SARS-CoV-2. This qualitative exploratory study examined how the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the delivery of routine health services from the perspective of health care system decision makers and managers. Between May and December 2022, we conducted forty-two semistructured interviews with decision makers from ministries of health and health care managers with responsibilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in eight countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. On the basis of these interviews, we identified themes in three domains: impacts on the provision of routine health services, including postponed and forgone primary care and hospital services; barriers to maintaining routine health services due to preexisting structural health care system weaknesses and difficulties attributed to the pandemic; and innovative strategies to sustain and recover services such as public-private financing and coordination, telemedicine, and new roles for primary care. In the short term, policy efforts should focus on recovering postponed services, including those for noncommunicable diseases. Medium- and long-term health care system reforms should strengthen primary care and address structural issues, such as fragmentation, to promote more resilient health care systems.

Clinical and Organizational Nursing Innovations in Primary Care: Findings From a Stakeholders' Symposium.

Nursing innovations in primary care, based on interprofessional care models, could be better identified, recognized, and deployed. This article presents the results of a symposium discussing the implementation of nursing innovations in primary care in Quebec, Canada, in partnership with researchers and stakeholders. Built on the appreciative inquiry approach, 9 nursing innovations were described. To support the implementation of such nursing innovations responding to current primary care issues and population needs, 4 recommendations emerged: the need to implement strategies to achieve optimal scope of practice for primary care nurses; the importance to develop funding and organizational models that support primary care nursing innovation; the need to enhance a collaborative and democratic governance open to innovation; and the opportunity to create partnerships with the research community and teaching institutions.

Heavy menstrual bleeding in adolescents: a primary issue in primary care

Heavy menstrual bleeding in adolescents: a primary issue in primary care

Improving access to treatment for alcohol dependence in primary care: A qualitative investigation of factors that facilitate and impede treatment access and completion.

Timely intervention for people with alcohol dependence in primary care is needed. Primary care services have a key role in supporting adults with alcohol dependence and require appropriate provision of services. To examine the perceptions of both primary care practitioners and adults with alcohol dependence regarding service provision and to describe help seeking behaviours for adults with alcohol dependence. Qualitative study consisting of semi-structured interviews with adults with alcohol dependence, healthcare professionals and staff members of specialist alcohol services who had previous or current experience in the management, treatment, or referral of adults with alcohol dependence in Northwest England. Interviews were conducted with ten adults with alcohol dependence and 15 staff. Data were analysed thematically, applying principles of constant comparison. Three themes were identified following inductive thematic analysis. The first theme, point of access relates to current service provision being reactive rather than preventative, the stigma associated with alcohol dependence and a person's preparedness to change. The second theme identified was treatment process and pathways that highlights difficulties of engagement, mental health support, direct access and person-centred support. The third theme was follow-up care and discusses the opportunities and threats of transitional support or aftercare for alcohol dependence, signposting and peer support. There are clear opportunities to support adults with alcohol dependence in primary care and the need to increase provision for timely intervention for alcohol related issues in primary care.

Exploring patterns of collaboration among professionals, organisations, patients and communities that meet complex challenges and promote patient well-being

Managing the well-being of a super-ageing society requires effective collaboration and communication between professionals, organisations, patients and families. Alongside education and training, the importance of a comprehensive understanding of interprofessional competencies cannot be understated. Professor Junji Haruta is building on his personal experience as a physician dealing with family illnesses to conduct research that promotes a holistic approach to medicine. He believes primary care professionals will play a crucial role in providing optimal care for the elderly population in communities for the next 20 years. Haruta is developing resources, including models and theories linked to education on complex issues in primary care, to promote effective interprofessional education. These can be utilised by individuals, universities, organisations and the wider community as a comprehensive system and facilitate the development of solutions to the increasingly complex challenges associated with healthcare, promoting individual and societal well-being. Haruta employs empirical generalisation, which explores relationships between two or more variables observed across different conditions and involves collecting findings from various cases and specific contexts to identify patterns. In one study, he and his collaborators investigated the learning process of medical students in an online community diagnostics programme using a realist approach, which involves theory-driven evaluation, to identify patterns of learning within this programme using the Context (C), Mechanism (M) and Outcome (O) framework. They found that the students acquired knowledge about communities through four distinct learning patterns, and the community diagnosis programme facilitated a deeper understanding of communities through the application of discovery learning, variation theory and cognitive flexibility theory.

A policy ethnography study of a Singapore regional health system on its governance adaptations and associated challenges as a project organisation to implement Healthier Singapore

ObjectivesProject organisations reflect a modern and non-bureaucratic form of organising public-sector activities, which promises innovation, entrepreneurship, and order and control to bring about change. This study seeks to investigate the project organisation Singapore Health Services (SingHealth) Region Health System (RHS)'s approach to implementing the Healthier Singapore (HSG) strategy, including models of governance and perceptions of RHS leads, identify the challenges facing the RHS, and to draw insights into the conditions necessary for using project organisation as a policy tool in policy implementation. Study designWe adopted a policy ethnography approach to answering the research question. MethodsThe approach involved: (1) non-participant observation with fieldnotes taken during meetings, events, programme activities, and conferences concerning SingHealth and HSG implementation; (2) analysis of 52 organisational documents; and (3) interviews with 21 senior SingHealth leaders from the RHS Executive Committee, involved in envisioning and overseeing the production of RHS projects to align with the HSG strategy (March to September 2022). ResultsEvidence demonstrates the presence of multiple governance and interactive governance in HSG implementation, including legitimising the RHS as the project organisation; engaging the private corporations; incorporating the citizens; and working with non-governmental organisations. However, the RHS faced many challenges, ranging from governance, workforce, financing, IT infrastructure and care models, problem definition, primary care and legacy issues, knowledge management, and being pandemic-informed in its delivery. ConclusionThe RHS will need to address these challenges through the necessary constitutive, directive, and operational actions, and interactive governance to enhance its institutional capacity to implement the HSG Strategy.

The Integration of Clinical Decision Support Systems Into Telemedicine for Patients With Multimorbidity in Primary Care Settings: Scoping Review.

Multimorbidity, the presence of more than one condition in a single individual, is a global health issue in primary care. Multimorbid patients tend to have a poor quality of life and suffer from a complicated care process. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) and telemedicine are the common information and communication technologies that have been used to reduce the complexity of patient management. However, each element of telemedicine and CDSSs is often examined separately and with great variability. Telemedicine has been used for simple patient education as well as more complex consultations and case management. For CDSSs, there is variability in data inputs, intended users, and outputs. Thus, there are several gaps in knowledge about how to integrate CDSSs into telemedicine and to what extent these integrated technological interventions can help improve patient outcomes for those with multimorbidity. Our aims were to (1) broadly review system designs for CDSSs that have been integrated into each function of telemedicine for multimorbid patients in primary care, (2) summarize the effectiveness of the interventions, and (3) identify gaps in the literature. An online search for literature was conducted up to November 2021 on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Searching from the reference lists was done to find additional potential studies. The eligibility criterion was that the study focused on the use of CDSSs in telemedicine for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The system design for the CDSS was extracted based on its software and hardware, source of input, input, tasks, output, and users. Each component was grouped by telemedicine functions: telemonitoring, teleconsultation, tele-case management, and tele-education. Seven experimental studies were included in this review: 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 non-RCTs. The interventions were designed to manage patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, polypharmacy, and gestational diabetes mellitus. CDSSs can be used for various telemedicine functions: telemonitoring (eg, feedback), teleconsultation (eg, guideline suggestions, advisory material provisions, and responses to simple queries), tele-case management (eg, sharing information across facilities and teams), and tele-education (eg, patient self-management). However, the structure of CDSSs, such as data input, tasks, output, and intended users or decision-makers, varied. With limited studies examining varying clinical outcomes, there was inconsistent evidence of the clinical effectiveness of the interventions. Telemedicine and CDSSs have a role in supporting patients with multimorbidity. CDSSs can likely be integrated into telehealth services to improve the quality and accessibility of care. However, issues surrounding such interventions need to be further explored. These issues include expanding the spectrum of medical conditions examined; examining tasks of CDSSs, particularly for screening and diagnosis of multiple conditions; and exploring the role of the patient as the direct user of the CDSS.

Diagnostic concordance of telemedicine as compared to face-to-face care in primary health care clinics in rural India: a randomized crossover trial.

Background With the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase and scaling up of provider-to-provider telemedicine programs that connect frontline health providers such as nurses and community health workers at primary care clinics with remote doctors at tertiary facilities to facilitate consultations for rural patients. Considering this new trend of increasing use of telemedicine, this study was conducted to generate evidence for patients, health providers, and policymakers to compare if provider-to-provider telemedicine-based care is equivalent to in-person care and is safe and acceptable in terms of diagnostic and treatment standards. Objective This study aims to compare the diagnosis and treatment decisions from teleconsultations to those of in-person care in teleclinics in rural Gujarat. Methods We conducted a diagnostic concordance study using a randomized crossover study design with 104 patients at 10 telemedicine primary care clinics. Patients reporting to 10 telemedicine primary care clinics were randomly assigned to first receive an in-person doctor consultation (59/104, 56.7%) or to first receive a health worker–assisted telemedicine consultation (45/104, 43.3%). The 2 groups were then switched, with the first group undergoing a telemedicine consultation following the in-person consultation and the second group receiving an in-person consultation after the teleconsultation. The in-person doctor and remote doctor were blinded to the diagnosis and management plan of the other. The diagnosis and treatment plan of in-person doctors was considered the gold standard. Results We enrolled 104 patients reporting a range of primary health care issues into the study. We observed 74% (77/104) diagnostic concordance and 79.8% (83/104) concordance in the treatment plan between the in-person and remote doctors. No significant association was found between the diagnostic and treatment concordance and the order of the consultation (P=.65 and P=.81, respectively), the frontline health worker–doctor pair (both P=.93), the gender of the patient (both P>.99), or the mode of teleconsultation (synchronous vs asynchronous; P=.32 and P=.29, respectively), as evaluated using Fisher exact tests. A significant association was seen between the diagnostic and treatment concordance and the type of case (P=.004 and P=.03, respectively). The highest diagnostic concordance was seen in the management of hypertension (20/21, 95% concordance; Cohen kappa=0.93) and diabetes (14/15, 93% concordance; Cohen kappa=0.89). The lowest values were seen in cardiology (1/3, 33%) and patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms (3/10, 30%). The use of a digital assistant to facilitate the consultation resulted in increased adherence to evidence-based care protocols. Conclusions The findings reflect that telemedicine can be a safe and acceptable alternative mode of care especially in remote rural settings when in-person care is not accessible. Telemedicine has advantages. for the potential gains for improved health care–seeking behavior for patients, reduced costs for the patient, and improved health system efficiency by reducing overcrowding at tertiary health facilities.

Determinants of referral for suspected coronary artery disease: a qualitative study based on decision thresholds

BackgroundChest pain is a frequent consultation issue in primary care, with coronary artery disease (CAD) being a serious potential cause. Primary care physicians (PCPs) assess the probability for CAD and refer patients to secondary care if necessary. Our aim was to explore PCPs’ referral decisions, and to investigate determinants which influenced those decisions.MethodsPCPs working in Hesse, Germany, were interviewed in a qualitative study. We used ‘stimulated recall’ with participants to discuss patients with suspected CAD. With a sample size of 26 cases from nine practices we reached inductive thematic saturation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed by inductive-deductive thematic content analysis. For the final interpretation of the material, we used the concept of decision thresholds proposed by Pauker and Kassirer.ResultsPCPs reflected on their decisions for or against a referral. Aside from patient characteristics determining disease probability, we identified general factors which can be understood as influencing the referral threshold. These factors relate to the practice environment, to PCPs themselves and to non-diagnostic patient characteristics. Proximity of specialist practice, relationship with specialist colleagues, and trust played a role. PCPs sometimes felt that invasive procedures were performed too easily. They tried to steer their patients through the system with the intent to avoid over-treatment. Most PCPs were unaware of guidelines but relied on informal local consensus, largely influenced by specialists. As a result, PCPs gatekeeping role was limited.ConclusionsWe could identify a large number of factors that impact referral for suspected CAD. Several of these factors offer possibilities to improve care at the clinical and system level. The threshold model proposed by Pauker and Kassirer was a useful framework for this kind of data analysis.