Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms Research Articles

Modified upside-down technique with Gore tapered iliac limbs for isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

To describe the off-label use of tapered iliac limbs for the treatment of isolated iliac aneurysms with proximal landing zone significantly larger than distal landing zone. Inversion of a Gore Excluder tapered leg (W. L. Gore & Associates Inc, Flagstaff, Arizona) with a modified upside-down technique is described. The endoprosthesis, with the olive at the tip of the releasing system previously cut, is inserted in a tip-to-tip fashion into a 15 Fr introducer sheath. The graft is released inside the introducer. An 18 Fr introducer sheath is advanced up to the proximal sealing zone. Following the removal of the 18 Fr dilator, the 15 Fr introducer with the pre-released graft is inserted co-axially into the 18 Fr introducer. A pre-cut 15 Fr dilator is brought up to the endograft and used as a pusher. A pull-back maneuver of the co-axial system, countertractioning with the dilator maintained in position, allows the delivery of the endograft. This technique might offer a feasible option in case of endovascular exclusion of isolated iliac artery aneurysms with significant landing zone diameter mismatch. Extracorporeal inversion is time-saving and could be safer in terms of graft damage and infection.

Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm: A Single-Center Experience.

Aortic rupture is a rare and catastrophic emergency. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are the primary determinants of mortality. During follow-up, the majority of patients who have been effectively treated die from hypovolemic shock and multiorgan failure. This article describes the clinical and procedural details of sixteen patients with ruptured aortic aneurysms treated endovascularly. In addition, it discusses the main factors contributing to the mortality of these patients. Patients who underwent endovascular treatment for acute aortic rupture at our center from October 2016 to March 2023 were included in this retrospective study. A total of 16 patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for acute aortic rupture. The patients' mean age was 73.06 years (range: 52-92), and 15 of them were male. The ruptures occurred in the abdominal aortic aneurysm in ten patients, in thoracic aortic aneurysm in three patients, in the isolated iliac artery aneurysm in two patients, and there was one case of non-aneurysmal aortic rupture. In our series, patients who presented with an impending, self-limited rupture and stable hemodynamic status had good prognostic outcomes. However, eight patients died due to multiorgan failure, hemorrhagic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, renal failure, or abdominal compartment syndrome. These patients generally had poor admission vital signs and low hemoglobin values. The most critical determinants for the success of the procedure are promptly stopping the bleeding, avoiding general anesthesia, and opting for blood product replacement instead of fluid replacement. Each patient with ruptured aortic aneurysm should be managed according to the patient's hemodynamics at presentation, the size of the aneurysm, the suitability for percutaneous procedure, logistical factors, and the operator-center's experience.

Clinical data, guidelines and real-world outcomes of endovascular iliac aneurysm repair with the GORE® EXCLUDER® Iliac Branch EndoprosthesisProvision of Services for People with Vascular Disease 2021

Isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries are extremely rare. They most frequently occur in the common iliac artery (CIA) and are least frequent in the external iliac artery (EIA).1 Most (95%) affected patients are male and the median age of diagnosis is in the seventh decade of life.2 The underlying pathology of isolated iliac artery aneurysms is similar to that of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This includes degenerative aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, penetrating ulcer, post-dissection aneurysm mycotic aneurysm, and traumatic aneurysm.3 Unlike patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, those with iliac artery aneurysms present with symptoms of compression of other structures, particularly the ureter, sacral plexus and iliac veins. Reported growth rate of isolated iliac artery aneurysms is similar to that of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ruptured isolated iliac artery aneurysms are associated with significant mortality,4 which is higher when treatment is undertaken as an emergency rather than an elective surgical procedure. Effective and timely intervention is therefore essential to improve survival. The aim of surgical treatment is to exclude the aneurysm from the circulation to prevent further growth and rupture. Traditional open surgical repair (OSR) was the mainstay of treatment but is technically challenging due to the location of the aneurysms in the pelvis and a frequent prior history of abdominal aortic aneurysms.1 Endovascular repair (EVAR) of isolated iliac artery aneurysms is a less invasive alternative to OSR. It is performed by a combination of branch-vessel coil embolisation and stent grafting, and has potential advantages over OSR in reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality.5 This supplement is a report of a satellite symposium held during the Vascular Societies' Annual Scientific Meeting in November 2022. It reviews clinical data, guidelines and real-world outcomes of endovascular iliac aneurysm repair with the GORE® EXCLUDER® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis.

Simultaneous aortoiliac kissing Endovascular stenting for management of isolated monolateral common iliac artery aneurysm with no proximal landing zone.

Isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IIAA) is an uncommon finding. It, accounts for 0.03% of all patients and 2% of all abdominal aneurysm. Endovascular approach represents the treatment of choice for most patients with IIAA. We reported our experience on iliac aneurysm with no proximal landing zone by simultaneous aortoiliac kissing endovascular (S.A.K.E.) covered stenting. This is a retrospective analysis of nine consecutive patients with IIAA with no proximal landing zone, who underwent endovascular kissing covered stenting (Gore®Viabahn®VBX) The median aneurysm diameter was 4.1cm, with a median 3-mm proximal neck length. In 3/9 aneurysms involving the internal iliac arteries the origin of the internal iliac artery was covered after its embolization and a stent graft extending to the external iliac artery (EIA) was placed. All stents were flared with semi-compliant balloon. Iliac aneurysm exclusion was obtained in all cases (100%), no graft migration or endo-leak were recorded. The median operative time was 28min; the median fluoroscopy time was 9min and a median 70mL of contrast was used. At a median 24-month follow-up, all patients are alive, and no endo-leak or migration, infection, distal embolization, limb loss were observed. Moderate buttock claudication was experienced in 1/9 patients with internal iliac artery embolization. In 6/9 patients a shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac was recorded after 1year. Endovascular management of IIAAs cases has been reported in literature and it was confirmed to be safe and successful. The IAA usually progresses into expansion which eventually leads into rupture. Adequate long proximal and distal landing zones were the most important feature related to better outcomes. Short proximal neck (˂10mm) represents a real challenge for iliac aneurysm treatment and, nowadays, a classical bifurcated aortoiliac endograft deployment represents the treatment of choice. Endovascular repair of isolated CIA aneurysms with no proximal neck is safe and successful using the SAKE stenting technique with VBX adequately flared and it represents effective and minimally invasive alternative to aortobiliac endograft implantation in the treatment of these aneurysms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report which describes this approach in the treatment of IIAA with no adequate proximal landing zone. Our approach overcomes the need to aortic bifurcation graft implantation and reduces procedure time, contrast dose and radiation exposure. It also preserves relevant collaterals vessels thanks to inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries sparing. A proximal aortic bifurcation endograft allows proximal sealing to be regained. Large population study with longer follow-up are needed to establish this approach as a new standard.

Endovascular Management of Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysm

Endovascular Management of Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysm

Endovascular Management of Giant Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms: A Case Series.

Endovascular Management of Giant Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms: A Case Series.

Application of a Novel Common-Iliac-Artery Skirt Technology (CST) in Treating Challenge Aorto-Iliac or Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms.

Purpose: To report a novel common-iliac-artery skirt technology (CST) in treating challenge iliac artery aneurysms.Methods: When required healthy landing zone of common iliac artery (CIA) is not available, CST is a strategy to exclude the internal iliac artery (IIA) and prevent IIA reflux without need of embolization. Patients who received endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in our center from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively screened, and patients treated with CST or with IIA embolization (IIAE) were enrolled.Results: After retrospective screen of 524 EVAR patients, 39 CST patients, 26 IIAE patients, and 7 CST + IIAE patients were enrolled in this study. CST group suggested to have more aged, hyperlipemia, and smoking patients than IIAE group. Two groups had comparable maximal diameter of abdominal aorta (AA), CIA, EIA, but larger diameter of IIA (CST 19.82 ± 2.281 vs. IIAE 27.82 ± 3.401, p = 0.048), and CIA bifurcation (CST 25.01 ± 1.316 vs. IIAE 29.76 ± 2.775, p = 0.087) was found in IIAE group. Anatomy of 79.5% of CST patients and 92.3% of IIAE patients (p = 0.293) was not suitable for potential use of iliac branch device. CST group had significant shorter surgery time (CST 97.42 ± 3.891 vs. IIAE 141.0 ± 8.010, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (CST 15.35 ± 0.873 vs. IIAE 19.32 ± 1.067, p = 0.009), lower in-hospital [CST 0% (0/39) vs. IIAE 11.5% (3/26), p = 0.059] and 1-year follow-up stent related MAEs [CST 6.7% (2/30) vs. IIAE 28.6% (6/21), p = 0.052], but comparable mortality and stent related MAEs for all-cohort follow-up analysis comparing to IIAE group. In our study, a lower in-hospital buttock claudication (BC) rate for CST (CST 20.5% vs. IIAE 46.2%, p = 0.053) and a comparable erectile dysfunction (ED) rate (CST 10.3% vs. IIAE 23.1%, p = 0.352) were found between CST and IIAE groups. After 1 year, both groups had about one third relief of BC symptoms [CST 33.3% (4/12) vs. IIAE 30.7% (4/13), p = 1.000]. Subgroup analysis of 14 patents concomitant with IIA aneurysm in CST group and the 7 CST + IIAE patients were carried out, and no difference was found in mortality, stent MAEs, sac dilation, or reintervention rate. Last, illustration of seven typical CST cases was presented.Conclusion: In selected cases, the CST is a safe, feasible-and-effective choose in treating challenge iliac artery aneurysms and preventing IIA endoleak.

Can we replace computed tomography angiography by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the surveillance of patients submitted to aortoiliac aneurysm repair?

This study was designed for evaluation of CEUS (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) for the detection of endoleaks after EVAR (endovascular aortic aneurysms repair) as an alternative to CTA (computed tomography angiography), the gold standard in post-EVAR surveillance. Post-EVAR surveillance of patients who underwent CEUS and CTA was retrospectively analyzed to compare the accuracy of CEUS compared to CTA. For that, the following parameters were analyzed: the largest aneurysm diameter, type of endoleaks, and the time elapsed after EVAR using both surveillance tests. The study involved 110 pairs of exams in patients with infrarenal aortoiliac or isolated iliac artery aneurysm, covering predominantly a male population (89%). The time elapsed after EVAR using CEUS or CTA exams were statistically similar, ranging from one to 58months (mean 12.2) and one to 65months (mean 9.7), respectively (p = 0.124). CEUS sensitivity was 75.5%, specificity 96.7%, false positives were 24.5%, and false negatives were 3.3%. The accuracy between the two exams was 87.3%. A secondary analysis, comparing CTA with CEUS as a reference standard, revealed CEUS sensitivity of 24.5%, higher than CTA for detecting endoleaks, with a concordance rate of true positive results of 75.5%. Among the endoleaks detected solely by CEUS (12 cases), one case was type Ia and eleven were type II, while those detected only by CTA (2 cases), one was type Ia and one type II. Additionally, a type II endoleak associated with type Ib, identified by CEUS, was seen as type II for CTA only. There was no difference between the pre-EVAR and the post-EVAR diameters of aortoiliac aneurysm (p = 0.058), both for CEUS and CTA. Computed tomography angiography, on the other hand, showed significant aneurysm diameter reduction compared to CEUS for isolated iliac artery aneurysms (p < 0.001). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was more effective than CTA in identifying and characterizing endoleaks in patients undergoing EVAR, especially type II endoleaks. The advantages include efficacy and, particularly, safety, and must be considered in EVAR surveillance protocols so that its use becomes widespread. We understand that CEUS, as a surveillance exam, considerably reduces risks to patients compared to CTA.

Isolated iliac artery aneurysm in association with congenital pelvic kidney treated with iliac branch device: case report

BackgroundAssociation of abdominal aortic aneurysm with congenital pelvic kidney is rare and association with isolated iliac artery aneurysm is not yet described in the literature.Case presentationWe present a case of successful repair of an isolated common iliac artery aneurysm associated with a congenital pelvic kidney treated by an endovascular technique. A 75-year-old man was referred for the treatment of an asymptomatic left common iliac artery aneurysm. A computed tomography angiography revealed an isolated left common iliac artery aneurysm and a left pelvic kidney. The maximum diameter of the aneurysm was 32 mm. The congenital pelvic kidney was supplied by three small superior polar arteries that emerged from the proximal non-aneurysmal portion of the common iliac artery and the main artery that arose from the left internal iliac artery. The aneurysm exclusion was accomplished by using an iliac branch device (Gore Excluder Iliac Branch, Flagstaff, AZ). The 1 and 6 months computed tomography angiography after the procedure demonstrated complete exclusion of the aneurysm and preservation of all renal arteries.ConclusionTreating patients with an association of iliac artery aneurysms and pelvic kidneys can be a challenge due the variable arterial anatomy. The use of iliac branch device is a safe and effective alternative in selected cases.

ISOLATED ILIAC ARTERY ANEURYSM- 10 YEARS INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE

Objective: To review the experience of our institution in repairing isolated iliac artery aneurysm (isolated IAA) in the last 10 years. Introduction: Unlike abdominal and combined aortoiliac artery aneurysms, isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs) are uncommon. An isolated iliac artery aneurysm is dened as a twofold increase in the diameter of the iliac artery without a coexisting aneurysm at another location. IIAA was encountered infrequently in the past, comprising 0.9% to 4.7% of all intra-abdominal aneurysms according to a review of previous studies; however, in recent times, many asymptomatic IIAAs have been detected incidentally because of the widespread use of abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent isolated IAA repair at Institute of vascular sciences, MMC and RGGGH, Chennai, India, were reviewed, to obtain information on patients' demographics, vascular risk factors, type of treatment and outcome Results: A total of 13 patients with 18 aneurysms, 11 men(84.6%) 2 women(15.4%), with a mean age of 58.1±6 years, and two paediatric patients of age 11yrs (Female) and 3 months (Male) were treated. The mean diameter was 4.6 ± 1.0 for non-ruptured at elective repair; 5.5±2.1 cm on the emergency cases. The majority of aneurysms were at the common iliac artery. All of them except one, underwent open repair.Ten (84%) had elective operations, and two (16%) emergency repair for ruptured aneurysm. Hypertension and diabetes were seen as the most common risk factors with most of the patients were smokers. One was a known case of CKD and the paediatric female was a known case of RHD. There was one postoperative death in this series, patient succumbed on POD 1. Conclusion: This case series reviews the literature with regard to the natural history, diagnostic workup, and treatment of iliac artery aneurysms. For patients undergoing elective repair, preoperative imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance is advocated. Repair is recommended for good-risk patients with aneurysms larger than 3.5 cm as there is high chances of rupture with increasing diameter.

Feasibility and Safety of Sac Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate in Emergency Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms or Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of sac embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) in emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and iliac artery aneurysm (IAA) in comparison to EVAR without sac embolization. Materials and Methods: Between February 2012 and December 2019, among 44 consecutive patients with ruptured AAA or IAA, 29 underwent EVAR. Of these, 22 patients (median age 77.5 years; 18 men) had concomitant sac embolization using NBCA; the remaining 7 patients (median age 88 years; 6 men) underwent EVAR without sac embolization and form the control group. The technical success, clinical success (hemodynamic stabilization), procedure-related complications, and mortality were compared between the groups. Results: All EVAR procedures and embolizations were successful. The clinical success rates in the NBCA and control groups were 95% (21/22) and 71% (5/7), respectively (p=0.14). There was no complication related to the procedure. Type II endoleak occurred in 4 of 21 patients (19%) in the NBCA group vs none of the control patients. One patient (5%) died in the NBCA group vs 3 (43%) in the controls (p=0.034). Conclusion: Sac embolization using NBCA in emergency EVAR appears to be feasible and safe for ruptured AAA and IAA.

Outcomes after Standalone Use of Gore Excluder Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis for Endovascular Repair of Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms

The aim of our study was to describe outcomes of stand-alone use (i.e., without concomitant implantation of an aortic stent graft) of the Gore Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) for elective endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. We evaluated all consecutive patients electively treated for isolated iliac artery aneurysms using standalone Gore Excluder IBE (January 2014-December 2018). Early (i.e., 30-day) endpoints were technical success, mortality, major adverse events (MAEs), and major access-site complications. Late endpoints were survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), internal iliac artery (IIA) primary patency, IIA branch instability, graft-related adverse events (GRAEs), secondary interventions, endoleaks (ELs), aneurysm sac behavior, and new-onset buttock claudication (BC). A total of 11 consecutive patients (10 men; median age 75years) were included. The technical success rate was 100%. At 30days, mortality, MAEs, and major access-site complications were all 0%. Survival and freedom from ARM were 91% and 100%, respectively; only one nonaortic related death was recorded during follow-up. At a median follow-up of 14months, IIA primary patency, IIA branch instability, and GRAEs were 100%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. No instances of graft migration ≥10mm were detected. No graft-related secondary interventions were recorded, and 2 patients required a procedure-related secondary intervention 3months after the index procedure (1 common femoral artery endarterectomy and 1 external iliac artery stenting). Although new-onset type 1 or type 3 ELs were never noted, one patient developed a new-onset type 2 EL. Aneurysm sac regression ≥5mm was noted in 6 patients (55%), whereas in the remaining ones, the sac size was stable. No instances of new-onset BC were noted. Use of standalone Gore Excluder IBE for elective endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment option. These results may support use of the technique as an effective means of endovascular reconstruction in patients with suitable anatomy.

The Treatment of Aneurysms of the Extremities Arteries - a Systematic Overview - New Therapies for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysm Employing a New Classification

Aneurysms of arteries in the extremities have a low incidence and are often manifest through complications. The most serious complications are rupture and extremity-threatening ischemia. Both usually lead to the diagnosis. Absolute indications for therapy are symptomatic aneurysms and asymptomatic aneurysms of 2 cm diameter or more. The extrailiacal gold standard is interponat or bypass with venous graft material. Endovascular methods are reserved for inoperable patients and clinical decisions on special cases. In contrast, complex endovascular techniques have been established in isolated iliac aneurysms and have significantly improved treatment options. Their implementation is bound to the existence of a suitable landing zone. This is the basis for a new classification of isolated iliac artery aneurysm. With the help of morphological subtypes, this classification permits standardised procedure planning for perfusion preservation of the internal iliac artery. The present article gives an overview of the current treatment strategy for aneurysms of extremities arteries. Similarities and regional differences in therapy are discussed.

Successful endovascular exclusion of an isolated iliac artery aneurysm causing “May–Thurner effect”

Successful endovascular exclusion of an isolated iliac artery aneurysm causing “May–Thurner effect”

Endovascular Repair of an Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with Liver Cirrhosis

Endovascular repair is increasingly becoming the main strategy for management of aortic and peripheral aneurysms. Several methods have been chosen to treat aneurysms based on the anatomy, coexisting nearby aneurysms and available tools. We present a 60 years old man with an isolated large iliac artery aneurysm which discovered incidentally and was treated using an endovascular approach and obliterating internal iliac artery without early and late complications at 3 years long follow up.

Endovascular Treatment Versus Open Surgery for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this review was to compare the outcomes of endovascular treatment (ET) versus open surgery (OS) for patients with isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs). Studies that reported ET and OS for IIAAs were searched in databases until December 5, 2018. Studies were included for reporting both ET and OS for patients with IIAAs, and at least one of the following outcomes: postoperative mortality, postoperative ischemic complications (PIC), wound complications, blood transfusion, and length of hospital stay (LHS). We adopted Inverse Variance method to calculate the mean difference (MD) of LHS, and adopted Mantel-Haenszel method for odds ratios (ORs) of postoperative mortality, PICs, wound complications, and blood transfusion. Nine studies were included, and all of them were observational studies, 7 studies were available for meta-analysis. When compared with OS, ET was associated with a higher risk of PICs (OR: 3.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-10.02), a lower risk of blood transfusion (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.58), and a much shorter LHS (MD: -4.39, 95% CI: -6.18 to -2.60). The postoperative mortality and wound complication were similar between groups. Both ET and OS were safe and effective methods to repair IIAAs with similar postoperative mortality. Compared with OS, ET can reduce the need for transfusion and the time of LHS, but it was associated with a higher risk of PICs. The comparisons of primary patency and reintervention rates were still unclear between the 2 groups.

Endovascular Repair of Iliac Artery Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience in 10-Years.

Isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) are rare, but nonetheless life-threatening when ruptured. The endovascular approach has taken over open repairs in time. The reported data is constituted of a retrospective series. We reviewed our 10-year-long experience with elective endovascular treatment of iliac aneurysms. Data regarding 22 patients with 24 IAAs treated with endovascular stent grafting between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. Twenty-two patients (aged 68.4 ± 9.6 years, range 50-82) with 24 unilateral or bilateral iliac aneurysms were treated. Twenty patients (91%) were male. Two patients with unilateral IAA had prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgical repair. The mean aneurysm diameter was 4.8 ± 2.1 (3.8 to 7.1) mm. Procedural success rate was 100%, only one patient with an iliovenous fistula had periprocedural type II endoleak. Internal iliac artery coil occlusion was applied in 16 of 24 procedures (66%). Thirty-day mortality included one patient (4%). Endovascular repair is the preferred approach for isolated IAAs. Because of the retrospective nature of data sets, larger cohorts are necessary for better definition of morbidity and mortality rates.

Primary Endovascular Elective Repair and Repair of Ruptured Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms Is Durable—Results of 72 Consecutive Patients

PurposeTo evaluate outcome of endovascular elective repair and repair of ruptured isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs) as a primary treatment strategy. Materials and MethodsAll patients with an IIAA undergoing endovascular treatment were included. Aneurysms were classified according to an anatomic classification and treated with coiling of the internal iliac artery, stent graft placement in the common to external iliac artery, or placement of a bifurcated aortoiliac stent graft. Between November 1996 and November 2015, 72 patients with 85 IIAAs underwent endovascular repair. Mean age was 73.9 years ± 9.2. Common iliac artery was involved in 63 patients (74.1%), internal iliac artery was involved in 21 patients (24.7%), and external iliac artery was involved in 1 patient (1.2%). Mean diameter was 5 cm (range, 2.5–11 cm). Emergency repair was performed in 19 patients owing to rupture (26.4%). ResultsOverall primary technical success rate was 95.8% with conversion rate to open surgery of 4.2% (all in the emergency group) and in-hospital mortality rate of 1.4%. During mean follow-up of 4.3 years ± 3.3 (median 3.8 y; range, 0–14.2 y), 17 endoleaks were observed (6 type I, 10 type II, 1 type IIIa). Overall reintervention rate was 16.7%. Primary patency rate was 98.6%. During the follow-up period, 22 deaths occurred (30.6%), including 2 aneurysm-related deaths (2.8%). ConclusionsPrimary endovascular repair of IIAAs shows excellent results and should be considered as first-line therapy. Surgical backup should be available in emergency cases.

Technical issues and clinical outcomes of endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms: A single-center experience.

Isolated iliac artery aneurysms are the relatively uncommon condition. This study aims to evaluate the technical issues and clinical outcomes of endovascular repair in a cohort of isolated iliac artery aneurysms treated. We retrospectively reviewed 22 consecutive patients with isolated iliac artery aneurysms between December 2006 and September 2016. Iliac artery aneurysms were treated in one of the three ways: (1) standard bifurcated aortic stent graft placement with limb extension; (2) coverage of iliac artery aneurysms with covered stent grafts; and (3) embolization of the arterial branches distal to the aneurysms with coils or vascular plugs. Twenty-two patients (20 men) with a mean age 64.7 years underwent endovascular repair during the study period. The median diameter of the isolated iliac artery aneurysms was 5.9 ± 1.7 cm (2.9-9.0 cm). Technical success was 95.5%. Conversion to open surgery was performed in one patient with bilateral internal iliac artery aneurysms. Four patients underwent placement of a bifurcated stent graft. A covered stent graft was deployed in 16 patients, with embolization of internal iliac artery in 14 patients. Simple coil embolization of isolated internal iliac artery aneurysm was performed in one patient. There was one sudden cardiac death on day 4 after the procedure due to heart failure. During the follow-up period (range: 1-50 months, mean 19.8 months), five patients died of causes not related to isolated iliac artery aneurysms, and transient buttock claudication was observed in one patient. Our study documents the safety and effectiveness of endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms with low morbidity and mortality.

TCTAP A-035 Impact on Aortic Diameter After Treatment for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysm Depending on Treatment Options

Isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAA) are relatively uncommon and represent 2-7% of all intra-abdominal arterial aneurysms. Open surgical repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm has been a treatment of choice. Since elective EVAR for AAA became standard treatment, this technique applied to IIAA