Isolated Iliac Aneurysms Research Articles

Modified upside-down technique with Gore tapered iliac limbs for isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

To describe the off-label use of tapered iliac limbs for the treatment of isolated iliac aneurysms with proximal landing zone significantly larger than distal landing zone. Inversion of a Gore Excluder tapered leg (W. L. Gore & Associates Inc, Flagstaff, Arizona) with a modified upside-down technique is described. The endoprosthesis, with the olive at the tip of the releasing system previously cut, is inserted in a tip-to-tip fashion into a 15 Fr introducer sheath. The graft is released inside the introducer. An 18 Fr introducer sheath is advanced up to the proximal sealing zone. Following the removal of the 18 Fr dilator, the 15 Fr introducer with the pre-released graft is inserted co-axially into the 18 Fr introducer. A pre-cut 15 Fr dilator is brought up to the endograft and used as a pusher. A pull-back maneuver of the co-axial system, countertractioning with the dilator maintained in position, allows the delivery of the endograft. This technique might offer a feasible option in case of endovascular exclusion of isolated iliac artery aneurysms with significant landing zone diameter mismatch. Extracorporeal inversion is time-saving and could be safer in terms of graft damage and infection.

Capturing the complexity of open abdominal aortic surgery in the endovascular era.

Volume and quality benchmarks for open abdominal aortic surgery and particularly open aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) in the endovascular era are guided by the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, but the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) OAR module fails to capture the full spectrum of complex OAR. We hypothesized that VQI-ineligible complex OAR would be the dominant form of open repairs performed at a VQI-participating tertiary center. All OAR cases performed at a single tertiary care center from 2007 to 2020 were reviewed. The VQI OAR criteria were applied with exclusions (non-VQI) defined as concomitant renal bypass, clamping above the superior mesenteric artery or celiac artery, repairs performed for trauma, anastomotic aneurysm, isolated iliac aneurysm, or infected aneurysms. Linear regression was used to assess temporal trends. Among a total of 481 open abdominal aortic operations, 355 (74%) were OAR. The average annual OAR volume remained stable over 14years (25± 6; P= .46). Non-VQI OAR comprised 54% of all cases and persisted over time (R2=0.047, P= .46). Supraceliac clamping (35%) was often necessary. The proportion of endograft explantation cases significantly increased over time from 4% in 2007 to 20% in 2019 (P= .01). Infectious indications represented 20% (n= 70) of cases. Visceral branch grafts were performed in 16% of all cases. OAR for ruptured aneurysm constituted 10% of cases. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in non-VQI vs VQI-eligible OAR cases (10% vs 4%; P= .04). Complex OAR comprises a majority of OAR cases in a contemporary tertiary referral hospital, yet these cases are not accounted for in the VQI. Creation of a "complex OAR" VQI module would capture these cases in a quality-driven national registry and help to better inform benchmarks for volume and outcomes in aortic surgery.

Endovascular management of iliac artery aneurysms

Purpose: The aim is to evaluate the role of endovascular interventions in treatment of iliac artery aneurysms with one year follow up. Patients and methods: our study included 20 patients with iliac artery aneurysms defined as (iliac artery with a diameter >3cm) with adequate proximal and distal landing zone. Patients with anastomotic aneurysms, infected aneurysms or with severe renal impairment (GFR <30ml/min/1.73m2) were excluded. FOR ISOLATED ILIAC ANEURYSM: access used through either: 1) Retrograde ipsilateral common femoral artery puncture. 2) Contralateral femoral puncture and performing a crossover technique. Under fluoroscopy, the stent graft devices were advanced into the iliac axis up to the planned graft deployment site, Embolization of the IIA was performed in cases where backflow from the IIA was expected to result in a type II endoleak. For Aorto-Iliac Aneurysms: Bilateral femoral access is needed to place endografts and can be performed via surgical femoral cut down. Once vascular access is established and landmarks for positioning the device are obtained with aortography, the main device is positioned with particular attention paid to the location of the opening for the contralateral iliac limb ("contralateral gate").

Effect of iliac tortuosity on outcomes after iliac branch procedures

ObjectiveTo report a two-centers evaluation of the effects of iliac axis tortuosity on iliac branch device (IBD) results. MethodsFrom 2015 to 2021, all IBD procedures performed at two European centers were analyzed retrospectively. The preoperative pelvic tortuosity index (PTI), external tortuosity index (ETI), and double iliac sign (DIS) were assessed for each iliac axis submitted to IBD. The primary endpoints were technical success, early and mid-term IBD complications (occlusion, stenosis, endoleaks [ELs]) and reinterventions, and the association with the PTI, ETI, and DIS. The 30-day mortality, survival, freedom from complications and freedom from reinterventions (FFR) were the secondary endpoints. ResultsDuring the study period, 224 patients had undergone 256 IBD procedures for 165 (64.5%) aortoiliac aneurysms, 44 (17.2%) isolated iliac aneurysms, 11 (4.3%) abdominal aortic aneurysms with a short iliac landing zone, and 36 (14.1%) type Ib ELs. IBD was planned with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for 158 (61.7%), fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for 45 (7.6%), and isolated for 53 (20.7%) cases. Technical success and 30-day mortality were 99.2% (254 of 256) and 0.9% (2 of 224), respectively. A PTI >1.4, an ETI >1.7, and the DIS were tested to identify the risk factors for the endpoints. No ELs and 9 (3.5%) IBD occlusions, requiring five reinterventions (2%), had occurred within 30 days. No association with the PTI, ETI, or DIS was identified; IBD oversizing of ≥25% on the external iliac artery was independently related to occlusion (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1-18.1; P = .045). The mean follow-up was 31 ± 27 months, with 11 IBD occlusions, 14 ELs, and 21 reinterventions. At 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up survival, IBD patency, and FFR were 95%, 89%, and 80%; 93%, 91%, and 90%; and 93%, 89%, and 83%, respectively. The risk factors for overall complications (n = 34; 13.3%) and reinterventions (n = 26; 10.2%) were an ETI >1.7 (P = .037 and P = .019), a PTI >1.4 (P = .016 and P = .012), and a type Ib EL as the indication (P = .025 and P = .001), respectively. Cox regression confirmed PTI >1.4 as an independent predictor of overall complications and reinterventions (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P = .018; and HR, 3 95% CI, 1.3-6.8; P = .018, respectively) and ETI >1.7 as an independent risk factor for ELs (HR 6; 95% CI, 2.1-17.5; P = .001). The freedom from complications and FFR were significantly lower with a PTI >1.4 at 3 years (73% vs 92% [log-rank P = .01] and 77% vs 93% [log-rank P = .001], respectively). ConclusionsWe found IBDs to be safe and effective in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms. Early complications are uncommon and related to endograft oversizing rather than anatomic characteristics in the present study. Iliac tortuosity is a risk factor for overall complications and reinterventions, in particular for IBD-related ELs.

Long-term implications of elective evar that is non-compliant with clinical practice guideline diameter thresholds

ObjectiveCompliance with Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) clinical practice guideline (CPG)-diameter thresholds is variable for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). To evaluate the implications and appropriateness of repairs that are noncompliant with current guidelines, we investigated the long-term outcomes, adherence to imaging follow-up, and associated health care costs in patients undergoing EVAR for AAA who do or do not meet recommended diameter thresholds. MethodsAll patients receiving elective EVAR from 2003 to 2016 in the SVS Vascular Quality Initiative with linked Medicare claims were reviewed. Weekend procedures and isolated iliac aneurysms, as well as symptomatic and ruptured presentations, were excluded. Diameter thresholds for noncompliant repairs were defined as: men <55 mm; women <50 mm who did not have an iliac diameter ≥30 mm. We evaluated adherence to postoperative imaging surveillance, reimbursement amounts, reintervention, rupture, and all-cause mortality. We defined an EVAR quality metric as performance of the index procedure with freedom from conversion to open repair, 5-year rupture-free survival, and adherence to minimum imaging surveillance (at least one computed tomography scan documented between 6 and 24 months postoperatively). ResultsAmong 19,018 elective EVARs, 35% did not meet CPG diameter thresholds (26% within 5 mm of threshold). The rate of noncompliant repairs increased over time (24% in 2003 vs 36% in 2016; P < .001). Patients undergoing noncompliant repairs were younger, less likely to have multiple comorbidities, and more likely to receive EVAR with adherence to instructions for use criteria (89% vs 79%; P < .001). Patients undergoing noncompliant repairs had greater 5-year freedom from reintervention (86% vs 81%; P < .001), rupture-free survival (94% vs 92%; P = .01), and overall survival rates (71% vs 61%; P < .001) compared with repairs that complied with CPG diameter thresholds. Although noncompliant repairs had higher rates of 1-year imaging surveillance, overall differences were modest (68% vs 65%; P = .003). Importantly, for the entire cohort, follow-up imaging surveillance decreased over time (93% in 2003 vs 63% in 2014; P < .001). Notably, although noncompliant repairs had higher rates of achieving the composite quality metric compared with compliant repairs (43% vs 38%; P < .001), failure occurred with a significant majority of all repairs. ConclusionsCompliance with SVS-endorsed CPG diameter thresholds for elective EVAR is poor, and rates of noncompliance are increasing. Noncompliant repairs appear to be offered more commonly to patients with fewer comorbidities and favorable anatomy, and these repairs are associated with improved rates of reintervention, rupture, and survival compared with procedures meeting CPG diameter thresholds. Importantly, noncompliant repairs fail to meet minimum quality standards in a majority of cases, which underscores the need for further policies to improve the overall quality and appropriateness of AAA care delivery nationally.

Capturing the Complexity of Open Abdominal Aortic Surgery in the Endovascular Era

Volume and quality benchmarks for open abdominal aortic surgery and, in particular, for open aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) in the endovascular era are actively debated. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) OAR module has failed to capture the full spectrum of complex OAR. We hypothesized that VQI-ineligible complex OAR would be the dominant form of open repair performed at a VQI-participating tertiary center. All OAR cases performed from 2007 to 2019 were reviewed. The VQI OAR criteria were applied, with exclusions (non-VQI) defined as concomitant renal bypass, clamping above the superior mesenteric artery or celiac artery, and repairs performed for trauma, an anastomotic aneurysm, isolated iliac aneurysm, or infected aneurysm. Linear regression was used to assess the temporal trends. Among a total of 456 open abdominal aortic operations, 330 (72%) were OARs. The average annual OAR volume remained stable over 13 years (25 ± 6; R2 = 0.05; P = .45). Non-VQI OAR comprised 54% of all cases and persisted over time (R2 = 0.03; P = .85; Fig). Both suprarenal (28%) and supraceliac (35%) clamping were often necessary. The proportion of endograft explantation cases increased significantly over time from 4% to 20% (mean, 14%; R2 = 0.47; P = .01). An infectious indication was present for 68 cases (21%). Visceral branch grafts were performed in 16% of all cases. OARs for a ruptured aneurysm constituted 10% of all cases. No statistically significant difference was found in 30-day mortality between the non-VQI and VQI-eligible OAR cases (8% vs 4%; P = .11). Complex OAR comprised a majority of OAR cases in a contemporary tertiary referral hospital; however, these cases were not accounted for in the VQI. Creation of a “complex OAR” VQI module would capture these cases in a quality-driven national registry and help to better inform the benchmarks for volume and outcomes in aortic surgery.

Prediction model of isolated iliac and abdominal aneurysms.

We analyse the cardiovascular risk factors in patients undergoing screening for Isolated Iliac Aneurysm (IIA) and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) and propose a logistic regression model to indicate patients at risk of IIA and/or AAA. A screening programme was carried out to identify the presence of aneurysm based on Duplex scan examination. Cardiovascular risk factors information was collected from each subject. A descriptive analysis for the incidence of IIA and AAA stratified by age and sex was carried out to evaluate factors incidence. A logistic regression model was developed to predict the probability of developing an aneurysm based on the observed risk factor levels. A threshold probability of aneurysm risk for a datum patient was also identified to effectively direct screening protocols to patients most at risk. A cohort of 10842 patients was evaluated: 1.52% affected by IIA, 2.69% by AAA and 3.90% by at least one. Risk factors analysis showed that: IIA was correlated with cardiological status, diabetes, cardiovascular disease family history, and dyslipidaemia; AAA was correlated with cardiological status, body mass index, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia; diabetes and dyslipidaemia were the most relevant factors with at least one aneurysm. The prediction tool based on the logistic regression and the threshold probability predict the presence of IIA and AAA in 69.7% and 83.8% of cases, under k-fold cross-validation. The proposed regression model can represent a valid aid to predict IIA and AAA presence and to select patients to be screened.

Racial Differences in Isolated Aortic, Concomitant Aortoiliac, and Isolated Iliac Aneurysms: This is a Retrospective Observational Study.

Our aim was to describe the racial and ethnic differences in presentation, baseline and operative characteristics, and outcomes after aortoiliac aneurysm repair. Previous studies have demonstrated racial and ethnic differences in prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms and showed more complex iliac anatomy in Asian patients. We identified all White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients undergoing aortoiliac aneurysm repair in the VQI from 2003 to 2019. We compared baseline comorbidities, operative characteristics, and perioperative outcomes by race and ethnicity. In our 60,435 patient cohort, Black patients, followed by Asian patients, were most likely to undergo repair for aortoiliac (W:23%, B:38%, A:31%, H:22%, P < 0.001) and isolated iliac aneurysms (W:1.0%, B:3.1%, A:1.5%, H:1.6%, P < 0.001), and White and Hispanic patients were most likely to undergo isolated aortic aneurysm repair (W:76%, B:59%, A:68%, H:76%, P < 0.001). Black patients were more likely to undergo symptomatic repair and underwent rupture repair at a smaller aortic diameter. The iliac aneurysm diameter was largest in Black and Asian patients. Asian patients were most likely to have aortic neck angulation above 60 degree, graft oversizing above 20%, and completion endoleaks. Also, Asian patients were more likely to have a hypogastric artery aneurysm and to undergo hypogastric coiling. Asian and Black patients were more likely to undergo repair for aortoiliac and isolated iliac aneurysms compared to White and Hispanic patients who were more likely to undergo repair for isolated aortic aneurysms. Moreover, there were significant racial differences in the demographics and anatomic characteristics that could be used to inform operative approach and device development.

Internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion for endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms.

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is used to treat aorto-iliac and isolated iliac aneurysms in selected patients, and prospective studies have shown advantages compared with open surgical repair, mainly in the first years of follow-up. Although this technique produces good results, anatomic issues (such as common iliac artery ectasia or an aneurysm that involves the iliac bifurcation) can make EVAR more complex and challenging and can lead to an inadequate distal seal zone for the stent-graft. Inadequate distal fixation in the common iliac arteries can lead to a type Ib endoleak. To avoid this complication, one of the most commonly used techniques is unilateral or bilateral internal iliac artery occlusion and extension of the iliac limb stent-graft to the external iliac arteries with or without embolisation of the internal iliac artery. However, this occlusion is not without harm and is associated with ischaemic complications in the pelvic territory such as buttock claudication, sexual dysfunction, ischaemic colitis, gluteal necrosis, and spinal cord injury. New endovascular devices and alternative techniques such as iliac branch devices and the sandwich technique have been described to maintain pelvic perfusion and decrease complications, achieving revascularisation of the internal iliac arteries in patients not suitable for an adequate seal zone in the common iliac arteries. These approaches may also preserve the quality of life of treated individuals and may decrease other serious complications including spinal cord ischaemia, ischaemic colitis, and gluteal necrosis, thereby decreasing the morbidity and mortality of EVAR. To assess the effects of internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion during endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms and isolated iliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialists searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 28 August 2019. The review authors searched Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and the Indice Bibliográfico Español de Ciencias de la Salud (IBECS) on 28 August 2019 and contacted specialists in the field and manufacturers to identify relevant studies. We planned to include all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared internal iliac artery revascularisation with internal iliac artery occlusion for patients undergoing endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms and isolated iliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. Two review authors independently assessed identified studies for potential inclusion in the review. We used standard methodological procedures in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. We identified no RCTs that met the inclusion criteria. We found no RCTs that compared internal iliac artery revascularisation versus internal iliac artery occlusion for endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms and isolated iliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. High-quality studies that evaluate the best strategy for managing endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms with inadequate distal seal zones in the common iliac artery are needed.

The Treatment of Aneurysms of the Extremities Arteries - a Systematic Overview - New Therapies for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysm Employing a New Classification

Aneurysms of arteries in the extremities have a low incidence and are often manifest through complications. The most serious complications are rupture and extremity-threatening ischemia. Both usually lead to the diagnosis. Absolute indications for therapy are symptomatic aneurysms and asymptomatic aneurysms of 2 cm diameter or more. The extrailiacal gold standard is interponat or bypass with venous graft material. Endovascular methods are reserved for inoperable patients and clinical decisions on special cases. In contrast, complex endovascular techniques have been established in isolated iliac aneurysms and have significantly improved treatment options. Their implementation is bound to the existence of a suitable landing zone. This is the basis for a new classification of isolated iliac artery aneurysm. With the help of morphological subtypes, this classification permits standardised procedure planning for perfusion preservation of the internal iliac artery. The present article gives an overview of the current treatment strategy for aneurysms of extremities arteries. Similarities and regional differences in therapy are discussed.

Late outcomes of different hypogastric stent grafts in aortoiliac endografting with iliac branch device: Results from the pELVIS Registry

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate long-term results of self-expanding vs balloon-expandable hypogastric stent grafts in conjunction with iliac branch devices (IBDs) for aortoiliac aneurysm repair in a multicenter experience (pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS involving the iliac bifurcation [pELVIS] Registry). MethodsAll patients electively treated for aortoiliac aneurysm with the Cook IBD (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) in nine European centers were reviewed. Clinical and imaging data were prospectively collected in each center, and a multicenter database was created and interrogated. The primary outcome was the primary patency of the IBDs. For the purpose of this investigation, three subgroups were identified: patients receiving a hypogastric balloon-expandable stent graft (BESg); those with a self-expanding stent graft (SESg); and those with any stent graft plus relining with a bare-metal stent (RESg). ResultsBetween 2005 and 2017, there were 691 patients who underwent 747 elective endovascular repairs of aortoiliac aneurysms (n = 518 [75.0%]) or isolated iliac aneurysms (n = 173 [25.0%]) with Cook IBDs (n = 56 bilateral) in nine European centers. Mean age was 72 years (range, 41-93 years); 658 (95.2%) patients were male. In 364 patients (52.7%), BESg was used; in 127 (18.4%), SESg; and in 200 (28.9%), RESg. At 30 days, there were 3 (0.4%) perioperative deaths, 3 (0.4%) technical failures, 7 (1.0%) graft thromboses, 30 (4.3%) reinterventions, and 1 (0.1%) conversion to open repair. After a mean follow-up of 32 months (range, 0-128 months), 28 (3.7%) IBD occlusions and 17 (2.3%) IBD-related endoleaks occurred. In 10 patients, iliac diameter increased >5 mm (1.4%). Overall primary patency was 99.2% at 1 month, 97.9% at 12 months, and 95.1% at 72 months. Primary patency was not significantly different in the BESg vs SESg or RESg cohorts (P = .4). During follow-up, there were 126 (18.2%) reinterventions, 93 (13.5%) of which were IBD related, including 11 (1.6%) conversions. Overall, freedom from reintervention and conversion was 90.4% at 12 months and 71.0% at 72 months. IBD-related reinterventions during follow-up in the three cohorts were not significantly different (P = .3) Overall survival was 71.3% at 72 months without differences between the subgroups. At multivariate analysis, aneurysmal hypogastric artery (P < .001; Exp [B] = 4.44) and bilateral treatment (P = .02; Exp [B] = 1.87) were associated with an increase in late failure. ConclusionsIn this wide real-world experience, long-term results of endovascular treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with the IBD are favorable, with a low rate of late graft occlusion and aneurysm-related death. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed in patients receiving hypogastric BESg vs SESg or endovascular relining.

Preliminary Results of the Evar 30-D SACVA Registry. The First and Largest Multicentric Registry in Southern Spain of Evar for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Introduction: EVAR has been adopted worldwide as a standard approach for AAA in high risk patients unfit for open repair (OR), but also offered to no high-risk patients with no friendly anatomy for EVAR, based in the lower short-term morbidity of the endovascular approach. But published data are still controversial about the benefits of this approach in patients fit for surgery or with hostile aortic anatomies. Methods: Consecutive cases included from January 2016 to December 2017 in a collaboration between 10 Vascular Surgery departments and the Sociedad Andaluza de Angiología y C Vascular(SACVA). Retrospective multicentre data collected through specific designed formularies analyzed by the statistical department FIBAO(CHU Jaen). Initial descriptive analysis are presented in this paper. Results: 372 cases were collected from 10 centers, range cases/center (74-3). Elective EVAR 306(82%) and emergent EVAR 66 cases(18%). Epidemiological data: 357(96%) males and 15(4%) females, mean age of 73,69y.o. for no emergent EVAR VS 75y.o. for emergent EVAR. Tobacco use(89%) followed by arterial hypertension(80%) are the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors. Based on AAA anatomy 76% were aortic aneurysms, 21% aorto-iliac and just 3% isolated iliac aneurysms. Mean of the AAA max diameter was 60.44mm for elective VS 75.54mm for emergent/ruptured cases. Mean neck diameter at renal arteries level was 24,3mm for elective VS 24.9mm for emergencies, and 2cm lower to renal was 26.57mm for elective vs 27.99mm for emergent. Anaesthetic risk 57.4% of the patients were ASA III and 25.7% ASA IV. Percutaneous access in 41.8% of the elective and 27.3% of the emergent cases. 29.7% of the cases where considered hostile neck anatomies, with 18.8% treated out of the instructions of use(IFU's) of the stentgraft. Stentgraft devices: 45.9 % with infrarenal fixation versus 54.1% suprarenal fixation. Technical success for EVAR achieved in 97.8%, with a conversion to OpenRepair rate inferior to 1.3%. 30-D endoleaks in 17.5% of the cases, from those 6% classed as type I. Hospital stay for elective EVAR was 4.85 days VS 8.44 for emergencies. Post-Implant syndrome in 17.4% patients. 30-D mortality for the 62 emergent cases was 22.2% VS 0.7% for the 312 elective. No major 30-D complications reported after EVAR in 85% of the elective cases versus 57.1% of the emergencies. Conclusion: The results of this multicentric registry, the largest with these characteristics performed in Spain shows similar 30-D results compared with other international registries and trials published in the literature, with a global decrease in 30-D mortality, lower than 1.5% for elective AAA repair and close to 20% for ruptured AAA, and reported technical success of superior to 98%. But the elevate number of cases included in this registry performed in hostile necks and out of the stentgrafts IFU's should be clearly remarked. Although it seems not to be relevant at the initial presented 30-D data after EVAR there is a need of close follow-up of these patients and it is mandatory to report the mid and long-term results of these patients over the next years. Disclosure: Nothing to disclose

Comparison of midterm results of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured and elective abdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveEndovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became an increasingly preferred modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair both in elective AAA repair (el-EVAR) and EVAR of a ruptured AAA (r-EVAR) setting. Ruptured AAAs usually have more hostile anatomies and less time for planning. Consequently, more complications may arise after r-EVAR. The purpose of this study was to compare mi-term outcomes between r-EVAR and el-EVAR. MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing EVAR from 2000 to 2015 at a tertiary institution was performed. Patients with previous aortic surgery, nonatherosclerotic AAA and isolated iliac aneurysms were excluded. In-hospital casualties or patients who were intraoperatively converted to open repair were also excluded. For the midterm outcome analysis, only patients with at least two postoperative examinations (a 30-day computed tomography scan and a second postoperative examination performed 6 months or later) were considered. The primary end point was freedom from aneurysm-related complications (a composite of type I or III endoleak, aneurysm sac growth, migration of more than 5 mm, device integrity failure, AAA-related death, late postimplant rupture, or AAA-related secondary intervention). Freedom from secondary interventions, neck-related events (defined as a composite of type IA endoleak, migration of more than 5 mm, or preemptive neck-related secondary intervention) and late survival were secondary end points. The impact of device instructions for use (IFU) compliance on neck events was also assessed. ResultsThe study included 565 patients (65 r-EVAR and 500 el-EVAR). Eighty-two patients were treated outside proximal neck IFU, 13 in the r-EVAR group (21.3%) and 69 (14.5%) in the el-EVAR (P = .16). During the index hospitalization, there were more complications (12.3% vs 3.2%; P = .001) and reinterventions (12.3% vs 2.8%; P < .001) in the r-EVAR group. After discharge, median clinical follow-up time was 4.3 years (interquartile range, 2.1-7.0 years) without differences between both groups. Five-year freedom from AAA-related complications was 53.9% in the r-EVAR group and 65.4% in the el-EVAR (P = .21). In multivariable analysis the r-EVAR group was not at increased risk for late complications (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.61; P = .81). Five-year freedom from neck-related events was 74% in r-EVAR and 82% in the el-EVAR group (P = .345). Patients treated outside neck IFU were at greater risk for neck-related events both in r-EVAR (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.8-22.9; P = .004) and el-EVAR group (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.5; P < .001). Freedom from secondary interventions at 5 years was 63.0% for r-EVAR and 76.9% for el-EVAR (P = .16). Survival at 5 years was 68.8% in the r-EVAR group and 73.3% in the el-EVAR group (P = .30). ConclusionsDurable and sustainable midterm outcomes were found for both r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients who survived the postoperative period. Patients treated outside the IFU are at greater risk for late complications. Surveillance protocols may be tailored according to individual anatomy and IFU compliance rather than timing of repair.

AN ALTERNATIVE WAY TO TREAT ILIAC ANEURYSM

Isolated iliac aneurysms or combined with aortic aneurysms can be treated through implantation of three balloon expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents in order to create a new iliac bifurcation. We present nine patients, unfit for open surgery and anatomically non suitable for

Surgical internal iliac artery preservation associated with endovascular repair of infrarenal aortoiliac aneurysms to avoid buttock claudication and distal type I endoleaks

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess outcomes of a hybrid technique for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) associated with iliac aneurysm without distal neck by combining an AAA endovascular repair approach with open surgery for preservation of the internal iliac artery (IIA). MethodsThe files of 51 patients operated on between 1998 and 2017 in a single vascular surgery department were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were patients with AAA associated with uni-iliac or bi-iliac aneurysm without suitable distal sealing zone. Surgery consisted of deployment of an aortouni-iliac stent graft combined with an extra-anatomic crossover prosthetic bypass. With use of a limited retroperitoneal approach, the contralateral proximal common iliac aneurysm was surgically excluded and the IIA revascularized by direct ilioiliac anastomosis or terminal common iliac suture, preserving the iliac bifurcation. ResultsThe patients' mean age was 74 years (58-88 years), and 92% were men. The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (0.1-18 years). Twenty-nine patients (57%) had one or more high-risk criteria for open surgery. Nineteen patients (37.3%) had aortouni-iliac aneurysms, 19 (37.3%) aortobi-iliac aneurysms, 5 (10%) isolated iliac aneurysms, and 8 (15.7%) bi-iliac aneurysms without aortic location. Four patients (7.8%) also had IIA aneurysms. Surgery was successful in all cases. Two patients (4%) died during the 30 days after surgery. One surgically preserved IIA occluded within the first month, resulting in buttock claudication. The 5-year IIA primary patency rate was 96%. Type I proximal endoleaks occurred in two patients, requiring additional surgery 3 years and 13 years after the initial surgery, respectively. ConclusionsThis hybrid technique, consisting of AAA endovascular exclusion combined with open IIA revascularization, is safe and effective for preservation of pelvic vascularization. It is associated with long-term patency and low morbidity rates. We have been using this technique since before the advent of branched dedicated devices, allowing preservation of the IIA with good results. This technique should continue to be proposed, especially in patients not eligible for endovascular iliac branch repair because of anatomic contraindications, to avoid pelvic ischemia if the IIA has to be sacrificed.

Management of isolated iliac aneurysms: A Tunisian center experience

Isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries are rare. The diagnoses of these aneurysms become easier with non-invasive radiologic investigations. The development of endovascular treatment is a recent alternative to surgical treatment. We report our experience in the management of 8 cases of isolated iliac aneurysms in the department of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery of the Habib Bourguiba Hospital of Sfax.

Comparable perioperative mortality outcomes in younger patients undergoing elective open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BackgroundEvidence for benefit of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) over open surgical repair for de novo infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in younger patients remains conflicting because of heterogeneous study populations and small sample sizes. The objective of this study was to compare perioperative and short-term outcomes for EVAR and open surgery in younger patients using a large national disease and procedure-specific data set. MethodsWe identified patients 65 years of age or younger undergoing first-time elective EVAR or open AAA repair from the Vascular Quality Initiative (2003-2014). We excluded patients with pararenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms, those medically unfit for open repair, and those undergoing EVAR for isolated iliac aneurysms. Clinical and procedural characteristics were balanced using inverse propensity of treatment weighting. A supplemental analysis extended the study to those younger than 70 years. ResultsWe identified 2641 patients, 73% (n = 1928) EVAR and 27% (n = 713) open repair. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 59-64 years), and 13% were female. The median follow-up time was 401 days (interquartile range, 357-459 days). Unadjusted perioperative survival was 99.6% overall (open repair, 99.1%; EVAR, 99.8%; P < .001), with 97.4% 1-year survival overall (open repair, 97.3%; EVAR, 97.4%; P = .9). Unadjusted reintervention rates were five (open repair) and seven (EVAR) reinterventions per 100 person-years (P = .8). After propensity weighting, the absolute incidence of perioperative mortality was <1% in both groups (open repair, 0.9%, EVAR, 0.2%; P < .001), and complication rates were low. Propensity-weighted survival (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.38; P = .6) and reintervention rates (open repair, 6; EVAR, 8; reinterventions per 100 person-years; P = .8) did not differ between the two interventions. The analysis of those younger than 70 years showed similar results. ConclusionsIn this study of younger patients undergoing repair of infrarenal AAA, 30-day morbidity and mortality for both open surgery and EVAR are low, and the absolute mortality difference is small. The prior published perioperative mortality and 1-year survival benefit of EVAR over open AAA repair is not observed in younger patients. Further studies of long-term durability are needed to guide decision-making for open repair vs EVAR in this population.

Secondary Procedures Following Iliac Branch Device Treatment of Aneurysms Involving the Iliac Bifurcation: The pELVIS Registry

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and reasons for secondary procedures in patients treated with iliac branch devices (IBDs) for isolated iliac aneurysm or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 575 surgical-high-risk patients (mean age 72.0±8.4 years; 558 men) with isolated iliac aneurysms (n=79) or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation (n=496) were treated with placement of 650 ZBIS or Gore IBDs (75 bilateral) in 6 European centers. The primary outcome was procedure-related reinterventions for occlusion or high-grade (>70%) stenosis of the bridging device, occlusion of the ipsilateral common or external iliac artery (EIA), type I/III endoleak, rupture, or infection following IBD implantation. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed based on preset definitions of comorbidities, aneurysm morphology, intraoperative variables, and follow-up strategies. Results: Nine (1.6%) reinterventions were performed within 30 days for occlusion or endoleak. Among 10 (1.5%) occluded EIAs ipsilateral to a deployed IBD, 6 underwent a reintervention with additional stent placement after thrombolysis (n=4) or a femorofemoral or iliofemoral crossover bypass (n=2). Three of 14 patients with early type I endoleak had a reintervention for an insufficient proximal sealing zone (stent-grafts in 2 common iliac arteries and 1 bifurcated endograft). Mean clinical and radiological follow-up were 32.6±9.9 and 29.8±21.1 months, respectively. Forty-two (7.3%) patients underwent reinterventions in the follow-up period. The overall postoperative reintervention rate was 8.9%. Both external and common iliac segments occluded in 30 (4.6%) IBDs; 2 patients had a crossover bypass and 14 were treated with endovascular techniques. In the other 14 patients, no specific treatment was performed. Seven (1.2%) patients with isolated EIA occlusion were treated during follow-up. Nineteen of the overall 28 patients with type I endoleak underwent endovascular repair. The other 9 were under radiological surveillance due to less significant (<5 mm) sac increase. No reintervention was performed to recanalize 11 (1.6%) occluded internal iliac arteries. Conclusion: Midterm experience with placement of IBDs is associated with a low incidence of secondary procedures due to type I endoleaks and occlusions. The main reasons for reinterventions seem to be short proximal sealing zone and poor conformability of the ZBIS device in elongated EIAs.

Perioperative and Late Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms

The aim of the study is to report early and follow-up outcomes of the endovascular treatment with iliac endografts for isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs). Records of patients who underwent elective endovascular repair for IIAA (both primary and para-anastomotic) from 2005 to 2015 in 2 Italian centers were retrospectively examined. Demographic data, preoperative patient comorbidities, iliac aneurysm characteristics, contralateral iliac axis involvement, patency of hypogastric arteries and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), and data of endovascular treatment were obtained for analysis. Early end points were technical success (TS), perioperative morbidity, clinical success (CS), freedom from reintervention (FFR) and survival. Follow-up end points were CS, FFR, survival, evolution of the aneurysmal sac, and endoleak (EL). Thirty-two IIAAs were treated through an endovascular approach in 30 patients (male 96.7%; mean age 74.2years±7.6, range 55-86). Aneurysms were para-anastomotic in 11 (34.4%) cases. Mean diameter was 42.9±15.6mm (range 30-100). Twenty (62.5%) aneurysms involved exclusively the common iliac artery, 7 (21.9%) the hypogastric, and 5 (15.6%) both arteries. Ipsilateral hypogastric artery was stenotic or occluded in 4 (12.5%) and 1 (3.1%) patient, respectively. Contralateral hypogastric artery was occluded in 2 (6.3%) cases. IMA was patent in 9 (30%) patients. The ostium of the hypogastric artery was preserved in 5 cases (15.6%) and voluntarily covered in 27 (84.4%). Endovascular embolization of hypogastric artery was obtained with a plug device in 8 cases (25%). Hypogastric surgical revascularization was performed in 2 cases (6.3%). TS was 96.9%. Thirty-day morbidity was 6.3% (2/32). CS was 96.9% (1 endograft limb stenosis). Thirty-day FFR was 90.6% (1 transluminal angioplasty, 2 inguinal revisions). Thirty-day survival was 100%. At 1, 3, and 6years, CS was 93.4%, 85.6%, and 85.6%, respectively (1 endograft limb thrombosis, 1 endograft limb stenosis, 1 hypogastric type II EL with sac enlargement). At 1, 3, and 6years, FFR was 87.5%, 76.8%, and 76.8%, respectively (1 fibrinolytic therapy and stenting, 1 stenting, 1 surgical ligation of hypogastric artery). At 1, 3, and 6years, survival was 100%, 96.3%, and 81.3%, respectively. No IIAA-related deaths were reported. During follow-up, aneurysmal diameter was unchanged in 12 cases (37.5%), decreased in 19 (59.4%), and increased in 1 (3.1%). Type II EL from hypogastric artery was detected in 3 cases (9.4%) and led to sac enlargement requiring surgical treatment in 1 case. Endovascular treatment of isolated iliac aneurysm is safe and effective, providing that strict anatomical requirements are respected. Aneurysm embolization with vascular plugs was not associated with pelvic complications in this series. Endograft stenosis and thrombosis are the most frequent complications, which can be easily managed with endovascular approaches.

Abdominal ultrasound-scanning versus non-contrast computed tomography as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm \u2013 a validation study from the randomized DANCAVAS study

BackgroundValidating non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (nCT) compared to ultrasound sonography (US) as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening.MethodsConsecutively attending men (n = 566) from the pilot study of the randomized Danish CardioVascular Screening trial (DANCAVAS trial), underwent nCT and US examination. Diameters were measured in outer-to-outer fashion. Sensitivity and specificity were done testing each modality against each other as reference standard. Measurements were tested for correlation, variance in diameters, and mean differences were tested using paired t-test.ResultsDue to logistics, 533 underwent both nCT and US. In four patients, aortae could not be visualized with US, and two of these had an AAA (>30 mm) as diagnosed by nCT. Using nCT 30 (5.7%, 95% CI: 4.2;7.5%) AAA were found. US failed to detect 9 of these, but diagnosed 3 other cases, resulting prevalence by US was 4.5% (95% CI: 3.0;6.6%). Additionally, 5 isolated iliac aneurysms (≥20 mm) (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.3;2.2%) were discovered by nCT.US performed reasonably, with sensitivity ranging from 57.1–70.4%, specificity however, ranged higher 99.2–99.6%. Comparably nCT performed with sensitivity ranging from 82.6–88.9%, nCTs specificity however ranged from 97.7–98.4%. Analysis showed good correlations with no tendency to increasing variance with increasing diameter, and no significant differences between nCT and US with means varying slightly in both axis.ConclusionsnCT seems superior to US concerning sensitivity, and is able to detect aneurysmal lesions not detectable with US. Finally, the prevalence of AAA in Denmark seems to remain relatively high, in this small pilot study group.