Isocenter Position Research Articles

Abstract PO5-22-02: Evaluation of a surface-guided and tattoo-less approach to setup for whole breast radiotherapy

Abstract Background: In preparation for adjuvant breast radiation therapy (RT), several small but permanent skin tattoo marks are often placed to assist with surface alignment for treatment setup and delivery. With advancements in surface-guided technologies, it may be possible to achieve setup accuracy with a “tattoo-less” approach, which can improve cosmetic and quality of life outcomes. This study evaluates the feasibility, accuracy, and potential dosimetric implications of a tattoo-less setup technique. Method: A retrospective analysis of 10 patients diagnosed with right-sided breast cancer who received adjuvant whole breast RT using a tattoo-less approach were included in this study. All patients received an initial whole breast dose of 42.56 Gray (Gy) in 16 daily fractions using a tangential three-dimensional conformal planning technique. This was followed by a 10Gy boost to the lumpectomy site delivered in 4 daily fractions. Daily setup for whole breast treatment was performed by aligning each patient to their individual reference breast surface generated from the planning computed tomography (CT) images via the Vision RT system. Bony landmarks were then verified via daily kV imaging, and translational shifts were recorded for each fraction. The kV imaging was performed to confirm the treatment positioning since the tattoo-less approach was new to the department. For 5 patients, dosimetric differences between initial surface alignment and shifts performed based on bony landmarks were evaluated by recalculating the original clinical plan with a new isocenter position using kV image shifts for each of their 16 treatment fractions. A plan sum of the 16 recalculated plans for each patient was used in further dosimetric analysis. Boost fractions were not included in this study, as setup was verified using surgical clips instead of bony anatomy. Results: Translational shifts for 158 fractions were reviewed as no kV imaging was performed for the other 2 fractions. The mean absolute kV imaging shift was 0.29 cm (CI (95%): 0.25, 0.32; range: 0 to 1.25) in the vertical axis, 0.28 cm (0.23, 0.32; 0 to 1.27) in the longitudinal axis, and 0.24 cm (0.20, 0.28; 0 to 1.98) in the lateral axis. Clinical plans for 5 patients were evaluated with a mean absolute kV shift of 0.27 cm (range: 0.15 to 0.39) in the vertical, 0.32 cm (0.13 to 0.77) in the longitudinal, and 0.29 cm (0.18 to 0.38) in the lateral directions. Dosimetric analysis revealed a slight increase in mean heart dose from the original clinical plan, with an average difference of 4.12 cGy (range: 0.7 to 10.5 cGy). The maximum increase in V20Gy of the ipsilateral lung was 2.7%. Less than 1% of change was observed in the maximum plan dose, as well as in the V95% coverage, expect for one patient, whose V95% was decreased from 99.6% to 94.6%. This difference was caused by a large longitudinal shift which could be attributed to possible patient movement. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the feasibility and accuracy of a tattoo-less treatment approach in a small cohort of breast cancer patients receiving whole breast RT. Further investigation with larger cohorts is warranted. Citation Format: Xinxin Zhang, Swati Mamidanna, Yin Zhang, Xiao Wang, Ning Yue, Shicha Kumar, Lindsay Potdevin, Maria Kowzun, Mridula George, Lara Hathout, Bruce Haffty, Nisha Ohri. Evaluation of a surface-guided and tattoo-less approach to setup for whole breast radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-22-02.

Inter-fractional error and intra-fractional motion of prostate and dosimetry comparisons of patient position registrations with versus without fiducial markers during treatment with carbon-ion radiotherapy.

A few reports have discussed the influence of inter-fractional position error and intra-fractional motion on dose distribution, particularly regarding a spread-out Bragg peak. We investigated inter-fractional and intra-fractional prostate position error by monitoring fiducial marker positions. In 2020, data from 15 patients with prostate cancer who received carbon-ion beam radiotherapy (CIRT) with gold markers were investigated. We checked marker positions before and during irradiation to calculate the inter-fractional positioning and intra-fractional movement and evaluated the CIRT dose distribution by adjusting the planning beam isocenter and clinical target volume (CTV) position. We compared the CTV dose coverages (CTV receiving 95% [V95%] or 98% [V98%] of the prescribed dose) between skeletal and fiducial matching irradiation on the treatment planning system. For inter-fractional error, the mean distance between the marker position in the planning images and that in a patient starting irradiation with skeletal matching was 1.49 ± 1.11mm (95th percentile = 1.85mm). The 95th percentile (maximum) values of the intra-fractional movement were 0.79mm (2.31mm), 1.17mm (2.48mm), 1.88mm (4.01mm), 1.23mm (3.00mm), and 2.09mm (8.46mm) along the lateral, inferior, superior, dorsal, and ventral axes, respectively. The mean V95% and V98% were 98.2% and 96.2% for the skeletal matching plan and 99.5% and 96.8% for the fiducial matching plan, respectively. Fiducial matching irradiation improved the CTV dose coverage compared with skeletal matching irradiation for CIRT for prostate cancer.

Characterization of real-time cine MR imaging distortion on 0.35 T MRgRT with concentric cine imaging QA phantom

Objective. Real-time MRgRT uses 2D-cine imaging for target tracking and motion evaluation. Rotation of gantry induced B 0 off-resonance, resulting in image artifacts and imaging isocenter-shift precluding MR-guided arc therapy. Standard MRI phantoms designed for higher resolution images face challenges when low-resolution cine imaging is needed to achieve high frame rates. This work aimed to examine the spatial accuracy including geometric distortion and isocenter shift in real-time during gantry rotation on a 0.35 T MR-Linac using the concentric Cine imaging quality assurance (QA) phantom and its associated image analysis software. Approach. The Cine imaging QA phantom consists of two concentric shells of low-T1 mineral oil and a central alignment structure. The phantom was scanned on three different MRI systems; 0.55 T Siemens Free.Max, 1.5 T Philips Ingenia, and 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian MR-Linac using 2D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) imaging sequence. In addition, bSSFP cine MRI with the banding artifact correction was tested on 0.35 T ViewRay MR-Linac. Images from the MR-Linac were acquired with the Linac gantry stationary and rotating from gantry 300°→ 0° and vice versa. Three orthogonal image planes were scanned excluding the 1.5 T Philips Ingenia, where only the axial plane was scanned. The image analysis software calculated the distortion values as well as the isocenter position for each cine frame. Main results. The geometric distortion of cine imaging on MRIs and MR-Linac at gantry stationary are within 1 mm while the substantial geometric distortion of 2 and 2.2 mm were observed on 0.35 T MR-Linac while rotating the gantry clockwise (300°→ 0°) and counterclockwise 0°→ 300° respectively. The average imaging isocenter shift was 0.1 mm for both MRIs and the static gantry and imaging isocenter shift of ≤1.5 mm was observed during the gantry rotation. The imaging isocenter shift decreased by 1 ± 0.2 mm clockwise and counterclockwise with B 0 compensation. Significance. The concentric Cine imaging QA phantom and its associated software effectively demonstrate the image distortion on real-time cine imaging on regular MRIs and 0.35 T MR-Linac. The results of significant geometric distortion with a rotating gantry in the MR-Linac system require further investigation to alleviate the extent of the image distortion.

Development of a digital star-shot analysis system for comparing radiation and imaging isocenters of proton treatment machine.

To directly compare the radiation and imaging isocenters of a proton treatment machine, we developed and evaluated a real-time radiation isocenter verification system. The system consists of a plastic scintillator (PI-200, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), an acrylic phantom, a steel ball on the detachable plate, Raspberry Pi 4 (Raspberry Pi Foundation, London, UK) with camera module, and analysis software implemented through a Python-based graphical user interface (GUI). After kV imaging alignment of the steel ball, the imaging isocenter defined as the position of the steel ball was extracted from the optical image. The proton star-shot was obtained by optical camera because the scintillator converted proton beam into visible light. Then the software computed both the minimum circle radius and the radiation isocenter position from the star-shot. And the deviation between the imaging isocenter and radiation isocenter was calculated. We compared our results with measurements obtained by Gafchromic EBT3 film (Ashland, NJ, USA). The minimum circle radii were averaged 0.29 and 0.41mm while the position deviations from the radiation isocenter to the laser marker were averaged 0.99 and 1.07mm, for our system and EBT3 film, respectively. Furthermore, the average position difference between the radiation isocenter and imaging isocenter was 0.27mm for our system. Our system reduced analysis time by 10min. Our system provided automated star-shot analysis with sufficient accuracy, and it is cost-effective alternative to conventional film-based method for radiation isocenter verification.

Evaluasi Tata Laksana Pemeriksaan CT Scan Kepala: Efek Miscentering Pada Dosis Lensa Mata dan Kualitas Citra

Improper patient position in the isocenter position can interfere with optimization efforts. This study aimed to evaluate the management of head CT scans by knowing the effect of miscentering on the eye lens dose and noise. We used a water phantom and patient image and conducted a retrospective study of 1025 patients. Doses were calculated using IndoseCT software, while noise and miscentering were calculated using IndoQCT software. The difference in the right and left eye lens doses was tested using the student's t-test. The water phantom's position is above and below the isocenter of ±10, ±20, and ±30 mm. While the patient is correct at the center of the gantry (isocenter), the laser marker is between the patient's eyes and the symphysis pubic, and the height of the table is adjusted to the patient's center of mass. The vertical miscentering rate (posterior-anterior) is around 67.8%, with a miscentering range from -30 to -21 mm. There was no significant difference between the right and left eye lens doses (P-value > 0.05). The eye lens dose increases as the phantom or patient position decreases from the isocenter and decreases as the phantom or patient position increases from the isocenter. Likewise, with noise, it increases as the phantom or patient position increases from the isocenter and decreases as the phantom or patient position decreases from the isocenter. Miscentering above the isocenter position can potentially reduce the eye lens dose. Keywords: Miscentering, Eye lens dose, noise

Full 3-D modulation transfer function estimation of tomosynthesis system using modified Richardson-Lucy deconvolution.

Tomosynthesis systems are three-dimensional (3-D) medical imaging devices that operate over limited acquisition angles using low radiation dosages. To measure the spatial resolution performance of a tomosynthesis system, the modulation transfer function (MTF) is widely used as a quantitative evaluationmetric. We previously introduced a method to estimate the full 3-D MTF of a cone-beam computed tomography system using two-dimensional (2-D) Richardson-Lucy (RL) deconvolution with Tikhonov-Miller regularization. However, this method can not be applied directly to estimate the 3-D MTF of a tomosynthesis system, since the unique artifacts (i.e., shadow artifacts, spreading tails, directional blurring, and high-level noise) of the system produce several errors that lower the estimation performance. Varying positions of the negative pixels due to shadow artifacts and spreading tails cause inconsistent deconvolution performances at each of the directional projections, and the severe noise in the reconstructed images cause noise amplification during estimation. This work proposes several modifications to the previous method to resolve the inconsistent performance and noise amplification errors to increase the full 3-D MTF estimationaccuracy. Three modifications were introduced to the 2-D RL deconvolution to prevent estimation errors and improve MTF estimation performance: non-negativity relaxation function, cost function to terminate the iterative process of RL deconvolution, and regularization strength for noise control. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed modifications, we reconstructed sphere phantoms from simulation and experimental tomosynthesis studies in the iso-center and offset-center positions as well as estimated the full 3-D MTFs using the previous and proposed methods. We compared the 3-D render images, central plane images, and center profiles of the estimated 3-D MTFs and calculated the full widths at half and tenth maximum for quantitativeevaluation. The previous method cannot estimate the full 3-D MTF of a tomosynthesis system; its inaccurate negative pixel relaxation produces circular-shaped errors, and the mean squared error based simple cost function for termination causes inconsistent estimation at each directional projection to diminish the clear edges of the low-frequency drop and missing sample regions. Noise amplification from lack of noise regularization is also seen in the previous method results. Compared to the previous method, the proposed method shows superior estimation performance at reducing errors in both the simulation and experimental studies regardless of object position. The proposed method preserves the low-frequency drop, missing sample regions from the limited acquisition angles, and missing cone region from the offset-center position; the estimated MTFs also show FWHM and FWTM values close to those of the ideal MTFs than with the previousmethod. This work presents a method to estimate the full 3-D MTF of a tomosynthesis system. The proposed modifications prevent circular-shaped errors and noise amplification due to the geometry for limited acquisition angles and high noise levels. Compared to our previous method, the proposed scheme show better performance for estimating the 3-D MTF of the tomosynthesissystem.

Development and multi-institutional evaluation of a new phantom for verifying beam-positioning errors at off-isocenter positions

PurposeSingle-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases requires highly accurate treatment delivery at off-isocenter positions (off-iso). This study aimed to verify the beam-positioning errors at off-iso using a newly developed phantom tested at multiple institutions. MethodsThe off-iso phantom comprised five stainless-steel balls with a 3-mm diameter placed at the center and at four peripheral positions on a diagonal line. Each ball was placed 3.5 cm apart along each of the three axes. Two patterns of the phantom setup were defined as 0° and 90° phantom rotations to evaluate the beam-positioning error, which is the distance between the center of the ball and the irradiated field on the electronic portal imaging device. Furthermore, the reproducibility of the beam-positioning errors was verified by evaluating their standard deviation (SD) at a single institution, which included five measurements for two treatment machines. The errors were evaluated at multiple institutions using eight treatment machines. ResultsThe measurement time from setup to image acquisition was approximately 20 min for two patterns. The SD of the beam-positioning errors in the reproducibility tests was 0.41 mm. In the multi-institutional evaluation, the beam-positioning error at the isocenter position was within 1.00 mm of the AAPM-RSS tolerance, with the exception of two linacs. The largest beam-positioning error (1.36 mm) was observed 7.5 cm away from the isocenter in three directions at a gantry angle of 180°. ConclusionsThe developed phantom can be applied as a new tool for establishing beam-positioning errors in single-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy at off-isocenter positions.

Initial end-to-end testing of the ExacTrac dynamic deep inspiration breath hold workflow using a breath hold breast phantom

ExacTrac Dynamic (ETD) provides a Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) workflow for breast patients. Stereoscopic x-ray imaging combined with optical and thermal mapping allows localisation against simulation imaging, alongside surface guided breath hold monitoring. This work aimed to determine appropriate imaging parameters, the optimal Hounsfield Unit (HU) threshold for patient contour generation and workflow evaluation via end-to-end (E2E) positioning using a custom breast DIBH phantom. After localisation via existing Image Guidance (IG), stereoscopic imaging was performed with a range of parameters to determine best agreement. Similarly, residual errors in prepositioning were minimised using a range of HU threshold contours. E2E positioning was completed for clinical workflows allowing residual isocentre position error measurement and existing IG comparison. Parameters of 60 kV and 25mAs were determined appropriate for patient imaging and HU thresholds between −600 HU and −200 HU enabled adequate prepositioning. The average and standard deviation in residual isocentre position error was 1.0 ± 0.9 mm, 0.4 ± 1.0 mm and 0.1 ± 0.5 mm in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions, respectively. Errors measured using existing IG were −0.6 ± 1.1 mm, 0.5 ± 0.7 mm and 0.2 ± 0.4 mm in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions, and 0.0 ± 1.0o, 0.5 ± 1.7o and −0.8 ± 1.8o for pitch roll and yaw. The use of bone weighted matching increased residual error, while simulated reduction of DIBH volume maintained isocentre positioning accuracy despite anatomical changes. This initial testing indicated suitability for clinical implementation during DIBH breast treatments.

Optimization of isocenter position for multiple brain metastases single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery to minimize dosimetric variations due to rotational uncertainty

PurposeThis paper studied a novel calculation framework that can determine the optimal value isocenter position of single isocenter SRS treatment plan for multiple brain metastases, in order to minimize the dosimetric variations caused by rotational uncertainty. Materials and methods21 patients with 2–4 GTVswho received SRS treatment for multiple brain metastases in our institution were selected for the retrospective study. The PTVwas obtained by expanding GTV 1 mm isotropic margin. We studied a stochastic optimization framework, which determined the optimal value isocenter location by maximizing the average target dose coverageCtarget,meanwith a rotation error of no more than 1°. We evaluated the performance of the optimal isocenter by comparing theCtarget,meanand average dice similarity coefficient (DSC)with the optimal value and the center of mass (CM) respectively as the treatment isocenter. The extra PTV margin to achieve 100% target dose coverage was calculated by our framework. ResultsCompared to the CM method, the optimal value isocenter method increased the averageCtarget,meanof all targets from 97.0% to 97.7%and the average DSC from 0.794to 0.799. Throughout all the cases, the average extra PTV margin to obtain full target dose coverage was 0.7 mmwhen using the optimal value isocenter as the treatment isocenter. ConclusionWe studied a novel computational framework using stochastic optimization to determine the optimal isocenter position of SRS treatment plan for multiple brain metastases. At the same time, our framework gave the extra PTV margin to obtain full target dose coverage.

Acceptance, commissioning and quality assurance of the MRIdian®: Site experience and three years follow-up

PurposeThis study presents the methodology and results of the acceptance and periodical quality controls on the MRIdian®. Materials and methodsThe impact of the magnetic field on other machines was investigated by controlling nearby linacs dose profiles. The image quality of the 0.345T MR scanner was evaluated, also assessing the integrated linear accelerator influence. The photon beams lateral and depth dose profiles were measured in motorized water tanks, along dose rate and output factors, and compared to Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. The isocenter position, gantry angles and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) position were controlled using film dosimetry. Gating latency and dosimetric accuracy were controlled with a dynamic phantom. ResultsThe magnetic field had no significant impact on other nearby linacs. Image quality was within tolerances and did not vary over time. Dose profiles measured showed good agreement with MC data, with maximum differences of 1.3% in-field. Output factors were within 0.8% of calculated values. Imaging and radiative isocenter matched within 0.9±0.4mm over all monthly controls. Gantry rotation was precise within –0.1±0.2°, with an isocenter variation of 1.4±0.3mm diameter. The average MLC position was within 0.4±0.1mm of theoretical value. Finally, the gating latency was 0.14±0.07sec and the gated dose within 0.3% of base value. ConclusionAll results are within the tolerances fixed by ViewRay® and show low variations over 2 years, comforting the use of small margins and gating for high-dose adaptive treatments.

Evaluation of an MRI linac magnetic isocenter walkout with gantry rotation in the presence of angle-specific corrections

Objective. To reduce the magnetic isocenter position variation with gantry rotation on an 0.35 T MRI-guided linac to a practically negligible level. Approach. Central fRequency (CF) offset, eddy current calibration, cross-term calibration, gradient delay, and gradient offsets are tuned for each MR linac installation at every 30° of gantry rotation and stored in a look-up table (LUT). During treatment, the CF is tuned only once in the beginning at an arbitrary gantry angle. After that, imaging paramters are offset based on the stored LUT values for any given gantry angle. Main results. For the same hardware configuration, the implementation of the gantry-angle-specific parameter corrections reduced the total isocenters range of travel in the transverse plane from 1.1 to 0.3 mm and from 0.8 to 0.2 mm in horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. With the longitudinal shift always being negligible (≤0.2 mm), the radius of the sphere encompassing the isocenter locations was reduced from 0.6 to 0.2 mm. Geometric distortion improved as well; in particular, the gantry-angle-averaged maximum longitudinal distortion within a 35 cm diameter sphere was reduced from 1.4 to 0.8 mm. Since the CF is tuned only once during treatment, imaging may resume promptly after the gantry reaches the next target position. Significance. The MRI-guided linear accelerator was conceived primarily as an instrument for precision image-guided therapy. Thus, it is important to keep the treatment and imaging isocentres as close as possible while minimizing the geometric distortion. The described solution reduces the walkout of the imaging isocenter to a fraction of 1 mm, while keeping geometric distortion in a substantial volume below 1 mm. The approach is robust and does not increase the overall procedure time.

Technical note: Comprehensive evaluations of gantry and couch rotation isocentricities for implementing proton stereotactic radiosurgery.

Mechanical accuracy should be verified before implementing a proton stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) program. Linear accelerator (Linac)-based SRS systems often use electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) to verify beam isocentricity. Because proton therapy systems do not have EPID, beam isocentricity tests of proton SRS may still rely on films, which are not efficient. To validate that our proton SRS system meets mechanical precision requirements and to present an efficient method to evaluate the couch and gantry's rotational isocentricity for our proton SRS system. A dedicated applicator to hold brass aperture for proton SRS system was designed. The mechanical precision of the system was tested using a metal ball and film for 11 combinations of gantry and couch angles. A more efficient quality assurance (QA) procedure was developed, which used a scintillator device to replace the film. The couch rotational isocentricity tests were performed using orthogonal kV x-rays with the couch rotated isocentrically to five positions (0°, 315°, 270°, 225°, and 180°). At each couch position, the distance between the metal ball in kV images and the imaging isocenter was measured. The gantry isocentricity tests were performed using a cone-shaped scintillator and proton beams at five gantry angles (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°), and the isocenter position and the distance of each beam path to the isocenter were obtained. Daily QA procedure was performed for 1month to test the robustness and reproducibility of the procedure. The gantry and couch rotational isocentricity exhibited sub-mm precision, with most measurements within ±0.5mm. The 1-month QA results showed that the procedure was robust and highly reproducible to within ±0.2mm. The gantry isocentricity test using the cone-shaped scintillator was accurate and sensitive to variations of ±0.2mm. The QA procedure was efficient enough to be completed within 30min. The 1-month isocentricity position variations were within 0.5mm, which demonstrating that the overall proton SRS system was stable and precise. The proton SRS Winston-Lutz QA procedure using a cone-shaped scintillator was efficient and robust. We were able to verify radiation delivery could be performed with sub-mm mechanical precision.

Impact of electronic portal image quality on Elekta AQUA® collimator isocenter.

The collimator radiation isocenter position determined in AQUA® v3.0 [Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden] software test "MLC Leaf and Jaw Position" was independently validated using an in-house MATLAB [Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.] script. The AQUA test determines radiation isocenter using the mean field center of nine 4 cm × 4 cm electronic portal imager (EPID) exposures at equidistant collimator angles. Impact of EPID image quality on AQUA reported isocenter for thirteen Elekta linear accelerators with Agility MLC heads were evaluated. Of the thirteen, three had visually and quantitatively identifiable artifacts. For the ten good EPID's there was a systematic 0.25 mm offset of the MATLAB calculated mean field center relative to AQUA in the X-axis and Y-axis. This corresponds to one image pixel and was found to be due to differences in software co-ordinate convention. After subtracting this offset there was no significant difference in AQUA and MATLAB calculated isocenter. For the three machines with poor image quality there was a demonstrated variation in AQUA calculated field center and therefore radiation isocenter relative to MATLAB. Restricting the region of interest (ROI) in AQUA software to only the irradiated section of the EPID brought AQUA and MATLAB result for these three machines into agreement.

Evaluation of plan quality and treatment efficiency in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans with a variable source-to-axis distance.

Radiotherapy deliveries with dynamic couch motions that shorten the source-to-axis distance (SAD) on a C-arm linac have the potential to increase treatment efficiency through the increase of the effective dose rate. In this investigation, we convert clinically deliverable volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans for cranial radiosurgery into virtual isocenter plans through implementation of couch trajectories that maintain the target at a shortened but variable SAD throughout treatment. A randomly sampled population of patients treated with cranial radiosurgery from within the last three years were separated into groups with one, two, and three lesions. All plans had a single isocenter (regardless of number of targets), and a single prescription dose. Patient treatment plans were converted from their original delivery at a standard isocenter to a dynamic virtual isocenter in MATLAB. The virtual isocenter plan featured a variable isocenter position based upon the closest achievable source-to-target distance (referred to herein as a virtual source-to-axis distance [vSAD]) which avoided collision zones on a TrueBeam STx platform. Apertures were magnified according to the vSAD and monitor units at a given control point were scaled based on the inverse square law. Doses were calculated for the plans with a virtual isocenter in the Eclipse (v13.6.23) treatment planning system (TPS) and were compared with the clinical plans. Plan metrics (MU, Paddick conformity index, gradient index, and the volume receiving 12 Gy or more), normal brain dose-volume differences, as well as maximum doses received by organs at risk (OARs) were assessed. The values were compared between standard and virtual isocenter plans with Wilcoxon Sign Ranked tests to determine significance. A subset of the plans were mapped to the MAX-HD anthropomorphic phantom which contained an insert housing EBT3 GafChromic film and a PTW 31010 microion chamber for dose verification on a linac. Delivering plans at a virtual isocenter resulted in an average reduction of 20.9% (p = 3×10-6 ) and 20.6% (p = 3.0×10-6 ) of MUs across all VMAT and all DCA plans, respectively. There was no significant change in OAR max doses received by plans delivered at a virtual isocenter. The low dose wash (1.0-2.0 Gy or 5-11% of the prescription dose) was increased (by approximately 20 cc) for plans with three lesions. This was equivalent to a 2.7%-3.8% volumetric increase in normal tissue receiving the respective dose level when comparing the plan with a virtual isocenter to a plan with a standard isocenter. Gamma pass rates with a 5%/1mm analysis criteria were 96.40% ± 2.90% and 95.07% ± 3.10% for deliveries at standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Absolute point dose agreements were within -0.36% ± 3.45% and -0.55% ± 3.39% for deliveries at a standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Potential time savings per arc were found to have linear relationship with the monitor units delivered per arc (savings of 0.009 s/MU with an r2 = 0.866 when fit to plans with a single lesion). Converting clinical plans at standard isocenter to a virtual isocenter design did not show any losses to plan quality while simultaneously improving treatment efficiency through MU reductions.

Simple and effective immobilization for radiation treatment of choroidal melanoma.

At our institution, patients diagnosed with choroidal melanoma requiring external beam radiation therapy are treated with two 6 MV volumetric-modulated arcs delivering 50 Gy over 5 daily fractions. The patient is immobilized using an Orfit head and neck mask and is directed to look at a light emitting diode (LED) during CT simulation and treatment to minimize eye movement. Patient positioning is checked with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) daily. Translational and rotational displacements greater than 1 mm or 1° off the planned isocenter position are corrected using a Hexapod couch. The aim of this study is to verify that the mask system provides adequate immobilization and to verify our 2-mm planning target volume (PTV) margins are sufficient. Residual displacements provided by pretreatment verification and post-treatment CBCT data sets were used to assess the impact of patient mobility during treatment on the reconstructed delivered dose to the target and organs at risk. The PTV margin calculated using van Herk's method1 was used to assess patient motion plus other factors that affect treatment position, such as kV-MV isocenter coincidence. Patient position variations were small and were shown to not cause significant dose variations between the planned and reconstructed dose to the target and organs at risk. The PTV margin analysis showed patient translational motion alone required a PTV margin of 1 mm. Given other factors that affect treatment delivery accuracy, a 2-mm PTV margin was shown to be sufficient for treatment of 95% of our patients with 100% of dose delivered to the GTV. The mask immobilization with LED focus is robust and we showed a 2-mm PTV margin is adequate with this technique.

Automatic measurement of beam-positioning accuracy at off-isocenter positions.

This study performed an automatic measurement of the off-axis beam-positioning accuracy at a single isocenter via the TrueBeam Developer mode and evaluated the beam-positioning accuracy considering the effect of couch rotational errors. TrueBeam STx and the Winston-Lutz test-dedicated phantom, with a 3 mm diameter steel ball, were used in this study. The phantom was placed on the treatment couch, and the Winston-Lutz test was performed at the isocenter for four gantry angles (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°) using an electronic portal imaging device. The phantom offset positions were at distances of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100mm from the isocenter along the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and left-right directions. Seventeen patterns of multileaf collimator-shaped square fields of 10 × 10 mm2 were created at the isocenter and off-axis positions for each gantry angle. The beam-positioning accuracy was evaluated with couch rotation along the yaw-axis (0°,±0.5°, and±1.0°). The mean beam-positioning errors at the isocenter and off-isocenter distances (from the isocenter to±100mm) were 0.46-0.60, 0.44-0.91, and 0.42-1.11mm for the couch angles of 0°,±0.5°, and±1°, respectively. The beam-positioning errors increased as the distance from the isocenter and couch rotation increased. These findings suggest that the beam-positioning accuracy at the isocenter and off-isocenter positions can be evaluated quickly and automatically using the TrueBeam Developer mode. The proposed procedure is expected to contribute to an efficient evaluation of the beam-positioning accuracy at off-isocenter positions.

Optimization of isocenter position for multiple targets with nonuniform-margin expansion.

The single isocenter for multiple-target (SIMT) technique has become a popular treatment technique for multiple brain metastases. We have implemented a method to obtain a nonuniform margin for SIMT technique. In this study, we further propose a method to determine the isocenter position so that the total expanded margin volume is minimal. Based on a statistical model, the relationship between nonuniform margin and the distance d (from isocenter to target point), setup uncertainties, and significance level was established. Due to the existence of rotational error, there is a nonlinear relationship between the margin volume and the isocenter position. Using numerical simulation, we study the relationship between optimal isocenter position and translational error, rotational error, and target size. In order to find the optimal isocenter position quickly, adaptive simulated annealing (ASA) algorithm was used. This method was implemented in the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system and compared with isocenter at center-of-geometric (COG), center-of-volume (COV), and center-of-surface (COS). Ten patients with multiple brain metastasis targets treated with the SIMT technique was selected for evaluation. When the size of tumors is equal, the optimal isocenter obtained by ASA and numerical simulation coincides with COG, COV, and COS. When the size of tumors is different, the optimal isocenter is close to the large tumor. The position of COS point is closer to the optimal point than the COV point for nearly all cases. Moreover, in some cases the COS point can be approximately selected as the optimal point. The ASA algorithm can reduce the calculating time from several hours to tens of seconds for three or more tumors. Using multiple brain metastases targets, a series of volume difference and calculating time were obtained for various tumor number, tumor size, and separation distances. Compared with the margin volume with isocenter at COG, the margin volume for optimal point can be reduced by up to 27.7%. Optimal treatment isocenter selection of multiple targets with large differences could reduce the total margin volume. ASA algorithm can significantly improve the speed of finding the optimal isocenter. This method can be used for clinical isocenter selection and is useful for the protection of normal tissue nearby.

Reduction in Total On-Table Time for Palliative Radiation Patients Using Pre-Treatment Field Validation

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Palliative radiation therapy is commonly used to help relieve pain, prevent pathologic fracture, and improve quality of life. Physicians often use conventional 2D or 3D conformal radiotherapy to treat these lesions with multi-field arrangements. These fields are traditionally verified with portal images obtained with the patient on the treatment table, to simultaneously evaluate block design accuracy and isocenter position. Unfortunately, this process can be time-consuming as each field needs to be independently and sequentially verified, which can negatively impact patients in pain on the treatment table. Therefore, minimizing total "on-table" time by streamlining the validation process can improve patient experience and quality of life during radiation therapy. Our research investigates an alternative validation process to reduce total on-table time and improve clinic efficiency by validating all fields with port films obtained prior to patient arrival, then verifying isocenter position against patient anatomy using cone beam CT (CBCT). An isodose-line (IDL) surrogate structure was utilized as needed for either block edge (e.g., 50% IDL) or clinically meaningful dose (e.g., 95% IDL) when deemed useful for verification of anatomy within the treatment field. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Data was gathered for 172 patients treated for palliation over nine years at a single institution within the VA system. From our record and verify system, "total table time" was acquired – defined as time from initial image procurement to completion of first treatment delivery. Data was analyzed based on patient setup method (PORTs vs. Pre-PORTs + CBCT) in addition to the treatment site. <h3>Results</h3> We found a significant 60% reduction in average on-table time when implementing the Pre-PORTs + CBCT validation method as compared to the traditional PORTs only method. <h3>Conclusion</h3> We report a practical process to verify field design and treatment iso-center while reducing total table time, an important goal especially in palliative cases to minimize pain and improve patient experience during radiation therapy. Additionally, this approach improves workflow and can potentially increase clinic throughput. While cone beam CTs for palliative patients are not always feasible in current reimbursement models, this technique can also improve patient safety and treatment accuracy by automating shifts and limiting table time for combative or altered patients, and thereby might ultimately provide added incentive for changing those models.

Surface guided 3DCRT in deep-inspiration breath-hold for left sided breast cancer radiotherapy: implementation and first clinical experience in Iran.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the overall accuracy of the surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) workflow through a comprehensive commissioning and quality assurance procedures and assess the potential benefits of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy as a cardiac and lung dose reduction approach for left-sided breast cancer irradiation. Accuracy and reproducibility of the optical surface scanner used for DIBH treatment were evaluated using different phantoms. Patient positioning accuracy and reproducibility of DIBH treatment were evaluated. Twenty patients were studied for treatment plan quality in target dose coverage and healthy organ sparing for the two different treatment techniques. Reproducibility tests for the surface scanner showed good stability within 1 mm in all directions. The maximum position variation between applied shifts on the couch and the scanner measured offsets is 1 mm in all directions. The clinical study of 200 fractions showed good agreement between the surface scanner and portal imaging with the isocenter position deviation of less than 3 mm in each lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction. The standard deviation of the DIBH level showed a value of < 2 mm during all evaluated DIBHs. Compared to the free breathing (FB) technique, DIBH showed significant reduction of 48% for heart mean dose, 43% for heart V25, and 20% for ipsilateral lung V20. Surface-guided radiotherapy can be regarded as an accurate tool for patient positioning and monitoring in breast radiotherapy. DIBH treatment are considered to be effective techniques in heart and ipsilateral lung dose reductions for left breast radiotherapy.

Development and feasibility evaluation of an AR-assisted radiotherapy positioning system.

PurposeThe aim of this study is to develop an augmented reality (AR)–assisted radiotherapy positioning system based on HoloLens 2 and to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of this method in the clinical environment.MethodsThe obtained simulated computed tomography (CT) images of an “ISO cube”, a cube phantom, and an anthropomorphic phantom were reconstructed into three-dimensional models and imported into the HoloLens 2. On the basis of the Vuforia marker attached to the “ISO cube” placed at the isocentric position of the linear accelerator, the correlation between the virtual and real space was established. First, the optimal conditions to minimize the deviation between virtual and real objects were explored under different conditions with a cube phantom. Then, the anthropomorphic phantom–based positioning was tested under the optimal conditions, and the positioning errors were evaluated with cone-beam CT.ResultsUnder the normal light intensity, the registration and tracking angles are 0°, the distance is 40 cm, and the deviation reached a minimum of 1.4 ± 0.3 mm. The program would not run without light. The hologram drift caused by the light change, camera occlusion, and head movement were 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, 1.0 ± 0.6 mm, and 1.5 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. The anthropomorphic phantom–based positioning errors were 3.1 ± 1.9 mm, 2.4 ± 2.5 mm, and 4.6 ± 2.8 mm in the X (lateral), Y (vertical), and Z (longitudinal) axes, respectively, and the angle deviation of Rtn was 0.26 ± 0.14°.ConclusionThe AR-assisted radiotherapy positioning based on HoloLens 2 is a feasible method with certain advantages, such as intuitive visual guidance, radiation-free position verification, and intelligent interaction. Hardware and software upgrades are expected to further improve accuracy and meet clinicalbrendaannmae requirements.