Islet Preparations Research Articles

Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion after Donation after Circulatory Death Improves Pancreatic Islet Isolation Yield

Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion (aNRP) is an in-situ normothermic oxygenated donor perfusion technique before procurement during controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) procedures and allows for organ quality evaluation. There are few data on the effect of aNRP on pancreatic islet isolation and subsequent transplantation outcomes. We aim to evaluate the impact of aNRP on cDCD pancreatic islet isolation and transplantation.A retrospective analysis was performed on pancreatic islet isolation outcomes from aNRP, cDCD, and Donation after Brain death (DBD) pancreases. Isolations were compared to previous donor age (60-75) matched isolations. Islet function was asses by a dynamic Glucose Stimulated Insulin Secretion (dGSIS).Donor baseline characteristics did not differ among groups. Isolations from aNRP pancreases (471,739 IEQ [655,435 – 244,851]) yielded more islets compared to cDCD (218,750 IEQ [375,951 – 112,364, p<0.01) and to DBD (206,522 IEQ [385,544 – 142,446, p=0.03) pancreases. dGSIS tests in seven aNRP islet preparations showed a mean stimulation index of 4.91, indicating good functionality. Bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase during aNRP correlated with islet yield (r2=0.685, p=0.002; r2=0.491, p=0.016 respectively).Islet isolation after aNRP in cDCD donors results in a high islet yield with viable functional islets. aNRP could increase the utilization of pancreases for islet transplantation.

Pancreatic islet cells in microfluidic-spun hydrogel microfibers for the treatment of diabetes

Islet transplantation has been developed as an effective cell therapy strategy to treat the progressive life-threatening disease Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). To mimic the natural islets and achieve immune isolation, hydrogel encapsulation of multiple islet cell types is the current endeavor. Here, we present a microfiber loading with pancreatic α and β cells by microfluidic spinning for diabetes treatment. Benefiting from microfluidic technology, the cells could be controllably and continuously loaded in the alginate and methacrylated hyaluronic acid (Alg-HAMA) microfiber and maintained their high bioactivity. The resultant microfiber could then hold the capacity of dual-mode glucose responsiveness attributed to the glucagon and insulin secreted by the encapsulated pancreatic α and β cells. After transplantation into the brown adipose tissue (BAT), these cell-laden microfibers showed successful blood glucose control in rodents and avoided the occurrence of hypoglycemia. These results conceived that the multicellular microfibers are expected to provide new insight into artificial islet preparation, diabetes treatment, and regenerative medicine as well as tissue engineering. Statement of significance•The microfibers were generated with a double network of alginate and methacrylated hyaluronic acid.•The microfibers could simultaneously encapsulate pancreatic α and β cells and showed dual-mode glucose responsiveness.•The cell-laden microfibers maintained a long-term hormone-releasing function in vivo.•Cell-laden microfibers transplanted into diabetic mice could achieve glycemic control for 6 weeks.

Secreted GDF15 maintains transcriptional responses during DNA damage-mediated senescence in human beta cells.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic metabolic disease resulting from an autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells. Beta cells activate various stress responses during the development of T1D, including senescence, which involves cell cycle arrest, prosurvival signaling, and a proinflammatory secretome termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). We previously identified growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) as a major SASP factor in human islets and human EndoC-βH5 beta cells in a model of DNA damage-mediated senescence that recapitulates features of senescent beta cells in T1D. Soluble GDF15 has been shown to exert protective effects on human and mouse beta cells during various forms of stress relevant to T1D; therefore, we hypothesized that secreted GDF15 may play a prosurvival role during DNA damage-mediated senescence in human beta cells. We found that elevated GDF15 secretion was associated with endogenous senescent beta cells in an islet preparation from a T1D donor, supporting the validity of our DNA damage model. Using antibody-based neutralization, we found that secreted endogenous GDF15 was not required for senescent human islet or EndoC cell viability. Rather, neutralization of GDF15 led to reduced expression of specific senescence-associated genes, including GDF15 itself and the prosurvival gene BCL2-like protein 1 (BCL2L1). Taken together, these data suggest that SASP factor GDF15 is not required to sustain senescent human islet viability, but it is required to maintain senescence-associated transcriptional responses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Beta cell senescence is an emerging contributor to the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes, but candidate therapeutic targets have not been identified in human beta cells. In this study, we examined the role of a secreted factor, GDF15, and found that although it is not required to maintain viability during senescence, it is required to fine-tune gene expression programs involved in the senescence response during DNA damage in human beta cells.

Exploring pancreatic beta-cell subgroups and their connectivity.

Functional pancreatic islet beta cells are essential to ensure glucose homeostasis across species from zebrafish to humans. These cells show significant heterogeneity, and emerging studies have revealed that connectivity across a hierarchical network is required for normal insulin release. Here, we discuss current thinking and areas of debate around intra-islet connectivity, cellular hierarchies and potential "controlling" beta-cell populations. We focus on methodologies, including comparisons of different cell preparations as well as in vitro and in vivo approaches to imaging and controlling the activity of human and rodent islet preparations. We also discuss the analytical approaches that can be applied to live-cell data to identify and study critical subgroups of cells with a disproportionate role in control Ca2+ dynamics and thus insulin secretion (such as "first responders", "leaders" and "hubs", as defined by Ca2+ responses to glucose stimulation). Possible mechanisms by which this hierarchy is achieved, its physiological relevance and how its loss may contribute to islet failure in diabetes mellitus are also considered. A glossary of terms and links to computational resources are provided.

Human research islet cell culture outcomes at the Alberta Diabetes Institute IsletCore

ABSTRACT Human islets from deceased organ donors have made important contributions to our understanding of pancreatic endocrine function and continue to be an important resource for research studies aimed at understanding, treating, and preventing diabetes. Understanding the impacts of isolation and culture upon the yield of human islets for research is important for planning research studies and islet distribution to distant laboratories. Here, we examine islet isolation and cell culture outcomes at the Alberta Diabetes Institute (ADI) IsletCore (n = 197). Research-focused isolations typically have a lower yield of islet equivalents (IEQ), with a median of 252,876 IEQ, but a higher purity (median 85%) than clinically focused isolations before culture. The median recovery of IEQs after culture was 75%, suggesting some loss. This was associated with a shift toward smaller islet particles, indicating possible islet fragmentation, and occurred within 24 h with no further loss after longer periods of culture (up to 136 h). No overall change in stimulation index as a measure of islet function was seen with culture time. These findings were replicated in a representative cohort of clinical islet preparations from the Clinical Islet Transplant Program at the University of Alberta. Thus, loss of islets occurs within 24 h of isolation, and there is no further impact of extended culture prior to islet distribution for research.

Advancing Diabetes Research: A Novel Islet Isolation Method from Living Donors.

Pancreatic islet isolation is critical for type 2 diabetes research. Although -omics approaches have shed light on islet molecular profiles, inconsistencies persist; on the other hand, functional studies are essential, but they require reliable and standardized isolation methods. Here, we propose a simplified protocol applied to very small-sized samples collected from partially pancreatectomized living donors. Islet isolation was performed by digesting tissue specimens collected during surgery within a collagenase P solution, followed by a Lympholyte density gradient separation; finally, functional assays and staining with dithizone were carried out. Isolated pancreatic islets exhibited functional responses to glucose and arginine stimulation mirroring donors' metabolic profiles, with insulin secretion significantly decreasing in diabetic islets compared to non-diabetic islets; conversely, proinsulin secretion showed an increasing trend from non-diabetic to diabetic islets. This novel islet isolation method from living patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy offers a valuable opportunity for targeted study of islet physiology, with the primary advantage of being time-effective and successfully preserving islet viability and functionality. It enables the generation of islet preparations that closely reflect donors' clinical profiles, simplifying the isolation process and eliminating the need for a Ricordi chamber. Thus, this method holds promises for advancing our understanding of diabetes and for new personalized pharmacological approaches.

Single Cell RNAseq Analysis of Cytokine-Treated Human Islets: Association of Cellular Stress with Impaired Cytokine Responsiveness.

Pancreatic β-cells are essential for survival, being the only cell type capable of insulin secretion. While they are believed to be vulnerable to damage by inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and interferon-gamma, we have recently identified physiological roles for cytokine signaling in rodent β-cells that include the stimulation of antiviral and antimicrobial gene expression and the inhibition of viral replication. In this study, we examine cytokine-stimulated changes in gene expression in human islets using single-cell RNA sequencing. Surprisingly, the global responses of human islets to cytokine exposure were remarkably blunted compared to our previous observations in the mouse. The small population of human islet cells that were cytokine responsive exhibited increased expression of IL-1β-stimulated antiviral guanylate-binding proteins, just like in the mouse. Most human islet cells were not responsive to cytokines, and this lack of responsiveness was associated with high expression of genes encoding ribosomal proteins. We further correlated the expression levels of RPL5 with stress response genes, and when expressed at high levels, RPL5 is predictive of failure to respond to cytokines in all endocrine cells. We postulate that donor causes of death and isolation methodologies may contribute to stress of the islet preparation. Our findings indicate that activation of stress responses in human islets limits cytokine-stimulated gene expression, and we urge caution in the evaluation of studies that have examined cytokine-stimulated gene expression in human islets without evaluation of stress-related gene expression.

A static glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (sGSIS) assay that is significantly predictive of time to diabetes reversal in the human islet bioassay

IntroductionStatic incubation (static glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, sGSIS) is a measure of islet secretory function. The Stimulation Index (SI; insulin produced in high glucose/insulin produced in low glucose) is currently used...

Donor- and isolation-related predictive factors of in vitro secretory function of cultured human islets.

Human islet preparations designated for research exhibit diverse insulin-secretory profiles. This study aims to assess the impact of donor- and isolation-related factors on in vitro islet secretory function. A retrospective analysis of 46 isolations from 23 pancreata discarded for clinical transplantation was conducted. In vitro islet secretory function tests were performed on Day 1 and Day 7 of culture. Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) were employed to investigate the relationships between various predictors characterizing the patient and donor characteristics as well as the isolation effectiveness and two functional outcomes including the islet stimulation index (SI) and area under the insulin curve (AUC). Fixed effects were introduced to represent the main effects of each predictor, and backward elimination was utilized to select the most significant fixed effects for the final model. Interaction effects between the timepoint (Day 7 vs. Day 1) and the predictors were also evaluated to assess whether predictors were associated with the temporal evolution of SI and AUC. Fold-change (Fc) values associated with each predictor were obtained by exponentiating the corresponding coefficients of the models, which were built on log-transformed outcomes. Analysis using LMMs revealed that donor body mass index (BMI) (Fc = 0.961, 95% CI = 0.927-0.996, p = 0.05), donor gender (female vs. male, Fc = 0.702, 95% CI = 0.524-0.942, p = 0.04), and donor hypertension (Fc = 0.623, 95% CI = 0.466-0.832, p= <0.01) were significantly and independently associated with SI. Moreover, donor gender (Fc = 0.512, 95% CI = 0.302-0.864, p = 0.02), donor cause of death (cerebrovascular accident vs. cardiac arrest, Fc = 2.129, 95% CI = 0.915-4.946, p = 0.09; trauma vs. cardiac arrest, Fc = 2.129, 95% CI = 1.112-7.106, p = 0.04), pancreas weight (Fc = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.001-1.019, p = 0.03), and islet equivalent (IEQ)/mg (Fc = 1.277, 95% CI = 1.088-1.510, p ≤ 0.01) were significantly and independently associated with AUC. There was no predictor significantly associated with the temporal evolution between Day 1 and Day 7 for both SI and AUC outcomes. This study identified donor- and isolation-related factors influencing in vitro islet secretory function. Further investigations are essential to validate the applicability of these results in clinical practice.

DNA Methylation-Based Assessment of Cell Composition in Human Pancreas and Islets.

Assessment of pancreas cell type composition is crucial to the understanding of the genesis of diabetes. Current approaches use immunodetection of protein markers, for example insulin as a marker of beta-cells. A major limitation of these methods is that protein content varies in physiological and pathological conditions, complicating the extrapolation to actual cell number. Here we demonstrate the use of cell type-specific DNA methylation markers for determining the fraction of specific cell types in human islet and pancreas specimens. We identified genomic loci that are uniquely demethylated in specific pancreatic cell types and applied targeted PCR to assess the methylation status of these loci in tissue samples, enabling inference of cell type composition. In islet preparations, normalization of insulin secretion to beta-cell DNA revealed similar beta-cell function in pre-T1D, T1D and T2D , which was significantly lower than in non-diabetic donors. In histological pancreas specimens from recent-onset T1D this assay showed beta-cell fraction within the normal range, suggesting a significant contribution of beta-cell dysfunction. In T2D pancreata we observed increased alpha-cell fraction and normal beta-cell fraction. Methylation-based analysis provides an accurate molecular alternative to immune detection of cell types in the human pancreas, with utility in the interpretation of insulin secretion assays and the assessment of pancreas cell composition in health and disease.

Advancements in innate immune regulation strategies in islet transplantation.

As a newly emerging organ transplantation technique, islet transplantation has shown the advantages of minimal trauma and high safety since it was first carried out. The proposal of the Edmonton protocol, which has been widely applied, was a breakthrough in this method. However, direct contact between islets and portal vein blood will cause a robust innate immune response leading to massive apoptosis of the graft, and macrophages play an essential role in the innate immune response. Therefore, therapeutic strategies targeting macrophages in the innate immune response have become a popular research topic in recent years. This paper will summarize and analyze recent research on strategies for regulating innate immunity, primarily focusing on macrophages, in the field of islet transplantation, including drug therapy, optimization of islet preparation process, islet engineering and Mesenchymal stem cells cotransplantation. We also expounded the heterogeneity, plasticity and activation mechanism of macrophages in islet transplantation, providing a theoretical basis for further research.

Silicone rubber membrane devices permit islet culture at high density without adverse effects.

Conventional culture conditions, such as in T-flasks, require that oxygen diffuse through the medium to reach the islets; in turn, islet surface area density is limited by oxygen availability. To culture a typical clinical islet preparation may require more than 20 T-175 flasks at the standard surface area density of 200IE/cm2. To circumvent this logistical constraint, we tested islets cultured on top of silicon gas-permeable (GP) membranes which place islets in close proximity to ambient oxygen. Oxygenation of individual islets under three culture conditions, standard low-density, non-GP high density, and GP high density, were first modeled with finite element simulations. Porcine islets from 30 preparations were cultured for 2days in devices with GP membrane bottoms or in paired cultures under conventional conditions. Islets were seeded at high density (HD, ∼4000IE/cm2, as measured by DNA) in both GP and non-GP devices. In simulations, individual islets under standard culture conditions and high density cultures on GP membranes were both well oxygenated whereas non-GP high density cultured islets were anoxic. Similarly, compared to the non-GP paired controls, islet viability and recovery were significantly increased in HD GP cultures. The diabetes reversal rate in nude diabetic mice was similar for HD GP devices and standard cultures but was minimal with non-GP HD cultures. Culturing islets in GP devices allows for a 20-fold increase of islet surface area density, greatly simplifying the culture process while maintaining islet viability and metabolism.

Islets-on-Chip: A Tool for Real-Time Assessment of Islet Function Prior to Transplantation.

Islet transplantation improves metabolic control in patients with unstable type 1 diabetes. Clinical outcomes have been improving over the last decade, and the widely used beta-score allows the evaluation of transplantation results. However, predictive pre-transplantation criteria of islet quality for clinical outcomes are lacking. In this proof-of-concept study, we examined whether characterization of the electrical activity of donor islets could provide a criterion. Aliquots of 8 human donor islets from the STABILOT study, sampled from islet preparations before transplantation, were characterized for purity and split for glucose-induced insulin secretion and electrical activity using multi-electrode-arrays. The latter tests glucose concentration dependencies, biphasic activity, hormones, and drug effects (adrenalin, GLP-1, glibenclamide) and provides a ranking of CHIP-scores from 1 to 6 (best) based on electrical islet activity. The analysis was performed online in real time using a dedicated board or offline. Grouping of beta-scores and CHIP-scores with high, intermediate, and low values was observed. Further analysis indicated correlation between CHIP-score and beta-score, although significance was not attained (R = 0.51, p = 0.1). This novel approach is easily implantable in islet isolation units and might provide means for the prediction of clinical outcomes. We acknowledge the small cohort size as the limitation of this pilot study.

Characteristics of research-focused human islet preparations from organ donors with type 2 diabetes

ABSTRACT Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) affects 463 million individuals worldwide. β-cell dysfunction and relatively inadequate β-cell mass has been implicated in the pathogenesis of T2D. Primary human islets from T2D patients can reveal the islet dysfunction and the underlying mechanisms and thus have become valued resources for diabetes research. Our center (Human Islet Resource Center, China) has prepared a number of batches of human islets from T2D organ donors. The present study aims to characterize islet isolation processes, islet yields, and qualities of T2D pancreases by comparing with non-diabetic (ND) ones. Overall, 24 T2D and 80 ND pancreases were obtained with informed research consents. The digestion time, islet purity, yield, size distribution, islet morphology score, viability, and function in each islet preparation were analyzed. We found that at digestion stage, T2D pancreases need significantly longer digestion duration and have worse digestion rates and lower gross islet yields. At purification stage, T2D pancreases have poorer purity, purification rate, morphology score, and islet yields after purification. Functional evaluation by GSI assay showed that the human T2D islets have significantly lower glucose stimulated insulin secretion ability. In conclusion, the features of longer digestion duration, lower yields and quality, and impaired insulin secretion in T2D group are consistent with the pathological condition of this disease. Both islet yields and islet function evaluation results did not support human T2D islets as clinical transplantation resources. However, they could serve as good research models for T2D disease studies and promote the advancement of diabetes research.

Evaluating the Potential for ABO-incompatible Islet Transplantation: Expression of ABH Antigens on Human Pancreata, Isolated Islets, and Embryonic Stem Cell-derived Islets.

ABO-incompatible transplantation has improved accessibility of kidney, heart, and liver transplantation. Pancreatic islet transplantation continues to be ABO-matched, yet ABH antigen expression within isolated human islets or novel human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived islets remain uncharacterized. We evaluated ABH glycans within human pancreata, isolated islets, hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors, and the ensuing in vivo mature islets following kidney subcapsular transplantation in rats. Analyses include fluorescence immunohistochemistry and single-cell analysis using flow cytometry. Within the pancreas, endocrine and ductal cells do not express ABH antigens. Conversely, pancreatic acinar tissues strongly express these antigens. Acinar tissues are present in a substantial portion of cells within islet preparations obtained for clinical transplantation. The hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors and their ensuing in vivo-matured islet-like clusters do not express ABH antigens. Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation should remain ABO-matched because of contaminant acinar tissue within islet preparations that express ABH glycans. Alternatively, hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors and the resulting in vivo-matured hESC-derived islets do not express ABH antigens. These findings introduce the potential for ABO-incompatible cell replacement treatment and offer evidence to support scalability of hESC-derived cell therapies in type 1 diabetes.

Comment on Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation as an Alternative to High-Risk Pancreatojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

We thank Dr Leo Hans Buhler and colleagues for their keen interest in our study1 and the editor for the opportunity to respond to the issues that were raised. The PAN-IT trial recruited patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and various other neoplastic disorders. Buhler and colleagues pointed out that in our study the proportion of patients with PDAC was 9 of 31 (29%) versus 5 of 30 (16.7%) for the pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and total pancreatectomy (TP-IAT) groups, respectively, and suggested that this difference (although nonsignificant: P = 0.36, Fisher exact test) may have favored TP-IAT over PD when assessing the outcomes of our trial, particularly disease-specific and overall survival. As reported in the article, to avoid imbalance in the severity of neoplastic disease between the 2 groups, we allocated patients to study treatment by minimization, to balance periampullary adenocarcinoma (including PDAC, ampullary adenocarcinoma, distal bile adenocarcinoma, and duodenum carcinoma) versus other neoplastic, benign or borderline lesions in the 2 groups. Randomization was indeed successful, as the proportion of patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma was 24 (PDAC n = 9) of 31 (77.4%) versus 21 (PDAC n = 5) of 30 (70%), for PD and TP-IAT, respectively (P = 0.57, Fisher exact test). To respond to the concern of Buhler and colleagues, we performed additional analyses of our data. However, numbers in the presented subanalyses are low and, therefore, results should be taken with caution, this being the reason why they were not presented in our original article. In an intention-to-treat subanalysis, morbidity rates in patients with PDAC versus other periampullary adenocarcinoma (other K) were 88.9% versus 100% (P = 0.37), respectively, after PD and 60% versus 68.8% (P = 1.00) after TP-IAT, that is, patients with PDAC had similar morbidity rates than patients with other K in both treatment groups. Therefore, the prevalence of PDAC within treatment groups did not influence our primary endpoint, that is, morbidity. In the Cox-regression analysis used in our original article to estimate overall and disease-specific survival for both treatment groups in patients at high risk of POPF (group A and B), we included PDAC diagnosis as an additional covariate. In this post hoc analysis, we confirmed a trend toward a reduction of mortality, even when taking into account PDAC diagnosis. For simplicity, we report only disease-specific survival data of this analysis: risk for death TP-IAT versus PD: HR = 0.57 (0.21–1.54), P = 0.27; PDAC versus others K: HR = 1.99 (0.77–5.1). Similarly, in the Cox-regression analysis used in our original article to estimate overall and disease-specific survival for both treatment groups in all patients (groups A, B, and C), we included PDAC diagnosis as an additional covariate. In this post hoc analysis, we again confirmed a trend toward a reduction of mortality, even when taking into account PDAC diagnosis. For simplicity, once more we report only disease-specific survival data of this analysis: risk for death TP-IAT versus PD: HR = 0.46 (0.21–1.54), P = 0.093; PDAC versus others K: HR = 1.58 (0.73–3.4), P = 0.24]. Furthermore, we understand and share the concerns of Buhler and colleagues on the risk of “SPIN”; however, we do not believe our results were presented so to raise the issue of SPIN. SPIN in RCTs is defined as “specific reporting strategies to highlight that the experimental treatment is beneficial, despite a statistically nonsignificant difference for the primary outcome.”2 In our trial, the primary outcome was indeed significant and we do considered an extremely positive result the finding of no significant differences in disease-free survival, site of recurrence, disease-specific survival and overall survival between PD and TP-IAT since the fear of infusing malignant cells with the islet preparation has been limiting the use of IAT for patients with malignancy. Moreover, we clearly stated that the trend toward a reduction of mortality was a post hoc finding and, as such, was not reported in the abstract. Finally, we reported among the limitations of the study the heterogeneity in term of indication for pancreatectomy and that our study was underpowered to detect significant difference in survival. As commonly accepted, we have used our post hoc analysis to suggest new working hypotheses and our recently started TP-IAT-01 trial (NCT05116072), which hypothesize that TP-IAT rather than PD may improve access to adjuvant chemotherapy, will hopefully provide further evidence for or against this hypothesis.

Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature

Islets transplanted for type-1 diabetes have their viability reduced by warm ischemia, dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG; hypoxia model), oxidative stress and cytokine injury. This results in frequent transplant failures and the major burden of patients having to undergo multiple rounds of treatment for insulin independence. Presently there is no reliable measure to assess islet preparation viability prior to clinical transplantation. We investigated deep morphological signatures (DMS) for detecting the exposure of islets to viability compromising insults from brightfield images. Accuracies ranged from 98 % to 68 % for; ROS damage, pro-inflammatory cytokines, warm ischemia and DMOG. When islets were disaggregated to single cells to enable higher throughput data collection, good accuracy was still obtained (83–71 %). Encapsulation of islets reduced accuracy for cytokine exposure, but it was still high (78 %). Unsupervised modelling of the DMS for islet preparations transplanted into a syngeneic mouse model was able to predict whether or not they would restore glucose control with 100 % accuracy. Our strategy for constructing DMS' is effective for the assessment of islet pre-transplant viability. If translated into the clinic, standard equipment could be used to prospectively identify non-functional islet preparations unable to contribute to the restoration of glucose control and reduce the burden of unsuccessful treatments.

Preparation of Whole-mount Mouse Islets on Vascular Extracellular Matrix for Live Islet Cell Microscopy.

Pancreatic islet β cells preferentially secrete insulin toward the plasma membrane, making contact with the capillary extracellular matrix (ECM). Isolated islets separated from the exocrine acinar cells are the best system for cell biology studies of primary β cells, whereas isolated islets lose their capillary network during ex vivo culture. Providing the appropriate extracellular signaling by attaching islets to vascular ECM-coated surfaces can restore the polarized insulin secretion toward the ECM. The guided secretion toward ECM-coated glass coverslips provides a good model for recording insulin secretion in real time to study its regulation. Additionally, β cells attached to the ECM-coated coverslips are suitable for confocal live imaging of subcellular components including adhesion molecules, cytoskeleton, and ion channels. This procedure is also compatible for total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, which provides optimal signal-to-noise ratio and high spatial precision of structures close to the plasma membrane. In this article, we describe the optimized protocol for vascular ECM-coating of glass coverslips and the process of attachment of isolated mouse islets on the coverslip. This preparation is compatible with any high-resolution microscopy of live primary β cells. Key features • Optimized coating procedure to attach isolated islets, compatible for both confocal and TIRF microscopy. • The ECM-coated glass coverslip functions as the artificial capillary surface to guide secretion toward the coated surface for optimal imaging of secretion events. • Shows the process of islets attachment to the ECM-coated surface in a 6-day ex vivo culture.

Is ABO Compatibility Important in Islet Transplantation?

One of the current criteria for clinical islet allotransplantation is ABO blood group compatibility between donor and recipient.1 The distribution of ABH antigens in human pancreata was first examined >40 y ago, revealing expression in acinar and vascular cells but not in islets.2 This underlined the importance of ABO matching in whole pancreas transplantation, but the situation in islet transplantation is more complicated. Although islets in situ appear to be ABH-negative,2 islets prepared for transplant are invariably contaminated with exocrine tissue including acinar cells. Furthermore, it is not known whether the islet isolation and transplantation process itself influence ABH expression. It is therefore somewhat surprising that ABH expression in islet preparations before and after transplant has not been characterized until now. In this issue of Transplantation, Verhoeff et al3 present a detailed immunohistochemical and flow cytometric survey of ABH antigen levels in human pancreatic tissue, isolated human clinical-grade islets, and islets derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). After confirming that ABH antigens are present on acinar cells but not on endocrine and ductal cells in the pancreas, the authors demonstrate that islet preparations consist primarily of ABH-negative endocrine cells but are significantly contaminated with ABH-positive acinar cells. When islets were transplanted into immunodeficient rats, the endocrine component was ABH-negative at 24 wk, whereas remnant acinar tissue stained positive. Pancreatic endocrine progenitors derived from hESCs were ABH-negative and remained so after in vivo maturation following transplantation into rats, although this was not unexpected given that the hESC donor was blood group O. The human-to-immunodeficient rat islet xenograft model used in the latter part of the study does have some limitations. First, the kidney subcapsular site does not accurately reflect the clinical scenario, in which islets are transplanted intraportally.1 Subcapsular delivery co-localizes the islets with acinar tissue fragments and potentially exposes the islets to “bystander” injury and inflammation when anti-ABH antibodies attack the acinar cells. In contrast, intraportal delivery disperses islets and acinar fragments widely throughout the liver microvasculature, which probably minimizes co-localization and thus reduces the likelihood of bystander effects. Furthermore, subcapsular but not intraportal delivery shields the graft from exposure to anti-ABH IgM antibodies. Although these differences are not relevant in the immunodeficient rat model, they may well be relevant in the clinical setting. Second, the immunodeficient rat model does not allow investigation of the importance of the in vivo anti-ABH immune response to islet grafts. I have worked with one of the authors (L.J.W.) to develop a mouse model of anti-A antibody-mediated rejection of transgenic blood group A-expressing cardiac grafts.4 However, these A-transgenic donor mice are unsuitable for examining anti-A–mediated islet graft rejection because expression of the antigen is endothelial cell-restricted and absent on islets. Humanized mouse models may be more appropriate, as suggested by the authors. The take-home message of this interesting paper is that ABO matching is indeed likely to be important in islet allotransplantation—as is the case for HLA matching5—but may become less so if islet purification efficiency improves sufficiently or if hESC-derived islets are used. On the former point, the authors speculate that the restriction of surface expression of ABH antigens to acinar tissue (starkly illustrated by Figure 6A in the paper) provides an opportunity to enrich the purity of A, B, or AB islets by some form of negative selection. Although practicality at scale may be an issue, this is an intriguing proposition that is worthy of further consideration.

253-LB: Ethnic Differences in Pancreatic Hormone Secretion in Health and T2D

Purpose: We tested the hypothesis that a critical biologic determinant of T2D disparities is based on ethnicity-related differences in pancreatic islet function. Methods: Utilizing donor tissues from the NIDDK-funded Human Pancreas Analysis Program (HPAP) , we examined both insulin and glucagon secretion from nondiabetic and diabetic Caucasian and African American donor islets. Initially, a physiological amino acid mixture was used to stimulate glucagon secretion, followed by low and high glucose to stimulate insulin secretion and suppress glucagon secretion. During the high glucose step, IBMX (0.1 mM) is added to potentiate secretion of both hormones. Insulin and glucagon concentration in perifusates and islet extracts was measured by radioimmunoassay or ELISA. Statistical comparisons were drawn by repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Comparing nondiabetic islets, we observed overlapping insulin secretion profiles between both ethnicities; however, glucagon secretion was distinctly greater in both nondiabetic African American (+111%) islets compared to nondiabetic Caucasian islets, under all interventions. In T2D, the reduction in insulin secretion was significantly greater in African American T2D donors (high glucose -76%; IBMX -76%) compared to Caucasian T2D donors (high glucose -47%; IBMX -50%) . More strikingly, glucagon secretion in T2D donors was markedly different based on ethnicity. Whereas Caucasian T2D islets exhibited a similar baseline of glucagon secretion compared to Caucasian controls, there was a marked reduction of glucagon secretion overall in African American T2D donors (-70%) compared to their corresponding controls. The largest detected difference was in IBMX-potentiation of glucagon secretion, which is higher in Caucasian T2D donors (+103%) but significantly decreased in African American T2D donors (-76%) . Preliminary analysis of hormone content in a subset of the donor islet preparations revealed no differences according to ethnicity. Conclusions: We propose that ethnicity-related differences in nondiabetic islet function may contribute to the enhanced risk of T2D. Disclosure N. M. Doliba: None. M. Brissova: None. K. H. Kaestner: None. D. A. Stoffers: Other Relationship; Biomarin, Correlagen. J. Roman: None. A. V. Rozo: None. W. Qin: None. C. Liu: None. A. Naji: None. M. R. Rickels: Advisory Panel; Sernova, Corp., Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Zealand Pharma A/S, Consultant; L-Nutra Inc. M. A. Atkinson: None. A. C. Powers: None. Funding This work is supported by 3UC4-112217-01S1 and U01-DK123594-02, UC4-DK-112217, UC4-DK-112232, and U01-DK-123716.