Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Research Articles

Response of Irritable Bowel Syndrome to Abdominal Fat Reduction

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the response of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) among patients having central obesity to reducing abdominal fat using Focused Ultrasound (cavitation) in addition with aerobic exercise as well as a low calorie, low-FODMAPs diet. Methods: A total of 60 individuals, between the ages of 20 and 45, who were diagnosed with both irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) as well as abdominal obesity, having a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 30 to 39.9 kg/m², were divided into two groups of similar size by a random assignment process. Group A were given focused ultrasound cavitation accompanied by moderate aerobic exercise and a low calorie, low-FODMAPs diet over a period of three months, whereas Group B (control group) were given moderate aerobic exercise and a low calorie, low-FODMAPs diet only. Assessments of total body fat, abdominal fat, severity of IBS, as well as quality of life related to IBS were conducted prior to and after the study period. Results: Overall body fat mass, abdominal fat mass, IBS severity, and IBS quality of life were all significantly improved in both groups. All evaluated variables showed a highly significant improvement in favor of the study group when comparing the two groups. Conclusion: Focused Ultrasound (cavitation) in addition with aerobic exercise as well as a low calorie, low-FODMAPs diet cause more improvement of irritable bowel syndrome symptoms and quality of life.

Gastrointestinal complaints after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Impact of microbiota and its metabolites

Unexplainable gastrointestinal complaints occasionally occur after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) surgery. We therefor investigated the impact of microbiota composition and metabolites on gastrointestinal complaints after RYGB. In the BARICO study (Bariatric surgery Rijnstate and Radboudumc neuroimaging and Cognition in Obesity), microbiota and metabolites were measured before surgery, and 6, and 24 months after surgery. Gastrointestinal complaints were assessed with the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) questionnaire 24 months after surgery. 65 participants (86.2 % female) with a mean age of 46.2 ± 6.0 years, and mean BMI of 41.2 ± 3.6 kg/m2 were included. According to the IBS-SSS questionnaire, 32.3 % had moderate/severe gastrointestinal complaints 24 months after surgery. Microbiota alpha diversity remained stable, while beta diversity significantly changed over time. Bile acids and short-chain fatty acids were significantly higher, and inflammatory markers significantly lower after surgery. Barnesiella sp., Escherichia/Shigella sp., and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii correlated positively, while Akkermansia sp correlated inversely with gastrointestinal complaints. Patients with mild and moderate/severe gastrointestinal complaints showed higher levels of GLC-3S. These findings suggest involvement of microbiota and metabolite changes in gastrointestinal complaints after surgery. However, it remains unclear whether bacteria influence gastrointestinal complaints directly or indirectly. Further exploration is required for development of interventions against gastrointestinal symptoms after surgery.

A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of a Short Course of Rifaximin 2200 mg/day on Abdominal Symptoms and its Effects on Quality of Life in Patients with Moderate to Severe Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Rifaximin is used to treat diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). However, determining the most effective regimen remains a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a 10-day high-dose course of rifaximin (2200 mg/day) and its effects on both abdominal symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with IBS-D. Adult patients with moderate to severe IBS-D (Rome IV) and fecal urgency and bloating were prescribed rifaximin 1100 mg twice daily for 10 days. Demographic information, the IBS Symptom Severity Index (IBS-SSI) score (using a 7-point Likert scale), and Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score were recorded at baseline, day 10, and 4 weeks after treatment cessation. IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and IBS-QOL scores were recorded at baseline and day 10. Any drug adverse effects were recorded. In total, 39 patients completed the study. Average scores for all abdominal symptoms and BSS showed significant improvement at day 10 and 4 weeks after treatment cessation (all p < 0.001). A significant improvement was seen in IBS-SSS and overall IBS-QOL score at day 10 (p < 0.001), with the highest improvement (31%) in interference with activity. Moreover, composite improvement rates were 38.64% for all abdominal symptoms, together with BSS < 5, bi-composite (66.67% for abdominal pain + bloating; 61.54% for abdominal pain + urgency), and 56.41% for tri-composite (abdominal pain + bloating + urgency) symptoms. Notably, no serious adverse effects were reported, and the adherence rate was 94.9%. Abdominal symptoms and overall QOL, especially in social and work dimensions, significantly improved in patients with moderate to severe IBS-D following a regimen of rifaximin 2200 mg/day, which was well tolerated.

Inflammatory Prostatitis Plus IBS-D Subtype and Correlation with Immunomodulating Agent Imbalance in Seminal Plasma: Novel Combined Treatment.

We recently demonstrated the effectiveness of long-term treatment with rifaximin and the probiotic DSF (De Simone formulation) in improving urogenital and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with both chronic inflammatory prostatitis (IIIa prostatitis) and diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), relative to patients with IBS-D alone. Because the low-grade inflammation of the intestine and prostate may be one of the reasons for co-developing both IIIa prostatitis and IBS-D, we designed the present study to once again evaluate the efficacy of combined rifaximin and DSF treatment in patients affected by IIIa prostatitis plus IBS-D, but we also measured seminal plasma pro-inflammatory (IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines before and after treatment. Methods: We consecutively enrolled 124 patients with IIIa prostatitis and IBS-D (diagnosed using the Rome III criteria). Patients were randomized into two groups: group A (n = 64) was treated with rifaximin (seven days per month for three months) followed by DSF, and group B (n = 60) was treated with a placebo. By the end of the intervention, 68.7% and 62.5% of patients from group A reported improved NIH-CPSI (National Institute of Health's Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index) and IBS-SSS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scoring System) scores, respectively, compared to only 3.3% and 5% of the placebo group. Group A patients also had significantly lower mean seminal plasma levels of IL-6 (11.3 vs. 32.4 pg/mL) and significantly higher mean levels of IL-10 (7.9 vs. 4.4 pg/mL) relative to baseline, whereas the levels of IL-6 and IL-10 did not change in the placebo group. Conclusions: The combined treatment with rifaximin and DSF appears to represent the optimal approach for addressing a syndrome such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D plus), which frequently co-occurs with prostatitis (IIIa prostatitis). This approach is particularly beneficial in cases where the symptoms are not always clearly delineated, the etiology is multifactorial, and the diagnosis is multilevel.

Impact of HADS Anxiety and Depression Scores on the Efficacy of Dietary Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Anxiety and depression are associated strongly with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Dietary therapies are used increasingly in the management of IBS, but the impact of common mental disorders on response to these has not been well studied. To examine whether symptoms compatible with common mental disorders influence response to dietary interventions. Prospective cohort study of adults, with either diarrhoea-predominant or mixed bowel habits, IBS Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] score ≥ 75 points. Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression score (HADS) and attended initially for British Dietary Association advice for IBS. IBS-SSS was re-checked 3 months later to assess response. If primary endpoint (≥ 50 point decrease in IBS-SSS) was not achieved, patients were offered low fermentable oligo-, di- and monosaccharides and polyol diet and repeated IBS-SSS after another 3 months. Secondary endpoints included of change in IBS-SSS and effect of symptom severity on response. In total, 448 patients took part, average age of 42 years and 79.0% were female. 69.9% of participants had HADS-A scores ≥ 8 and 39.3% with HADS-D scores ≥ 8. Average IBS-SSS score at baseline was 290 (SD 86). No significant difference was noted in achievement of the primary endpoint according to HADS-A scores (53.4% vs. 62.2% by ITT in those with HADS-A ≥ 8 vs. HADS-A < 8, p = 0.09). Patients with HADS-D ≥ 8 were significantly less likely to achieve the primary endpoint compared with those with HADS-D < 8 (43.8% vs. 64.0% by ITT, p < 0.01). Understanding psychological profile of patients can help predicting their response to IBS dietary interventions.

Impact of Enteric Nervous Cells on Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Potential Treatment Options.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a condition that significantly impacts the lifestyle, health, and habits of numerous individuals worldwide. Its diagnosis and classification are based on the Rome criteria, updated periodically to reflect new research findings in this field. IBS can be classified into different types based on symptoms, each with distinct treatment approaches and some differences in their pathophysiology. The exact pathological background of IBS remains unclear, with many aspects still unknown. Recent research developments suggest that disorders in the brain-gut-microbiota axis are key contributors to the symptoms and severity of IBS. The central nervous system (CNS) interacts bidirectionally with intestinal processes within the lumen and the intestinal wall, with the autonomic nervous system, particularly the vagus nerve, playing an important role. However, the enteric nervous system (ENS) is also crucial in the pathophysiological pathway of IBS. The apeline-corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling route via enteric glia and serotonin production in enteroendocrine cells at the enteric barrier are among the most well-understood new findings that affect IBS through the ENS. Additionally, the microbiota regulates neuronal signals, modifying enteric function by altering the number of enteric bacteria and other mechanisms. Given the limited therapeutic options currently available, it is essential to identify new treatment targets, with the brain-gut axis, particularly the enteric nervous system, being a promising focus. This study aims to delineate the molecular mechanisms that induce IBS and to suggest potential targets for future research and treatment of this potentially debilitating disease.

Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Is Associated with the Severity of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Background and Objectives: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), as a gastrointestinal disorder, presents with abdomen pain and alterations in the bowel habits. Its pathogenesis remains unclear. Here, we examined mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtCN) in IBS and its clinical value. Materials and Methods: mtCN was analyzed in 43 IBS patients using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, data on the clinical characteristics of patients and symptom severity of IBS were collected, and their association with mtCN was analyzed. Results: mtCN was higher in patients with IBS (p = 0.008) and those with a drinking habit (p = 0.004). Smoking and the presence of a sleep partner showed a possible association with mtCN; however, it did not reach significance. The severity of IBS symptoms tended to positively correlate with mtCN (r = 0.279, p = 0.070). Conclusions: Overall, we demonstrated a potential association between mtCN and the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with IBS. Further studies considering genetic and clinical factors are required.

Low-dose titrated amitriptyline as second-line treatment for adults with irritable bowel syndrome in primary care: the ATLANTIS RCT.

Irritable bowel syndrome, characterised by abdominal pain and a change in stool form or frequency, is most often managed in primary care. When first-line therapies are ineffective, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines suggest considering low-dose tricyclic antidepressants as second-line treatment, but their effectiveness in primary care is unknown and they are infrequently prescribed by general practitioners. To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of low-dose titrated amitriptyline as a second-line treatment for irritable bowel syndrome in primary care. A pragmatic, randomised, multicentre, two-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A nested, qualitative study explored participant and general practitioner experiences of treatments and trial participation, and implications for wider use of amitriptyline for irritable bowel syndrome in primary care. Participants, clinicians, investigators and analysts were masked to allocation. Fifty-five general practices in three regions in England (Wessex, West of England, West Yorkshire). Patients aged ≥ 18 years meeting Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome with ongoing symptoms after trying first-line treatments and no contraindications to TCAs. Amitriptyline 10 mg once-daily, self-titrated by participants to a maximum of 30 mg once-daily or matched placebo for 6 months. Participants randomised 1 : 1 with most having the option to continue blinded treatment for a further 6 months. The primary participant-reported outcome was the effect of amitriptyline on global irritable bowel syndrome symptoms at 6 months, measured using the irritable bowel syndrome Severity Scoring System, with a 35-point between-group difference defined as the minimum clinically important difference. The key secondary outcome was the proportion of participants reporting subjective global assessment of relief at 6 months, defined as somewhat, considerable, or complete relief of symptoms. Other secondary outcomes included: effect on global symptoms, via the irritable bowel syndrome Severity Scoring System, and subjective global assessment of relief of irritable bowel syndrome symptoms at 3 and 12 months; effect on somatic symptom-reporting at 6 months; anxiety an-d depression scores; ability to work and participate in other activities at 3, 6 and 12 months; acceptability, tolerability and adherence to trial medication. Four hundred and sixty-three participants were randomised to amitriptyline (232) or placebo (231). An intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome showed a significant difference in favour of amitriptyline for irritable bowel syndrome Severity Scoring System score between arms at 6 months [-27.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) -46.9 to -7.10; p = 0.008]. For the key secondary outcome of subjective global assessment of relief of irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, amitriptyline was superior to placebo at 6 months (odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.66; p = 0.005). Amitriptyline was superior to placebo across a range of other irritable bowel syndrome symptom measures but had no impact on somatoform symptom-reporting, anxiety, depression, or work and social adjustment scores. Adverse event trial withdrawals were more common with amitriptyline (12.9% vs. 8.7% for placebo) but most adverse events were mild. The qualitative study thematically analysed 77 semistructured interviews with 42 participants and 16 GPs. Most participants found the self-titration process acceptable and empowering. General practitioners should offer low-dose amitriptyline to patients with irritable bowel syndrome whose symptoms do not improve with first-line therapies. Guidance and resources should support GP-patient communication to distinguish amitriptyline for irritable bowel syndrome from use as an antidepressant and to support patients managing their own dose titration. This trial is registered as ISRCTN48075063. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/162/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment Vol. 28, No. 66. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Fecal Proteolytic Bacteria and Staphylococcal Superantigens Are Associated With Abdominal Pain Severity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Changes in the composition of the gut microbiota have been associated with the development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, to what extent specific bacterial species relate to clinical symptoms remains poorly characterized. We investigated the clinical relevance of bacterial species linked with increased proteolytic activity, histamine production, and superantigen (SAg) production in patients with IBS. Fecal (n = 309) and nasal (n = 214) samples were collected from patients with IBS and healthy volunteers (HV). Clinical symptoms and gut transit time were evaluated. Bacterial abundance in feces and nasal swabs as well as fecal trypsin-like activity were assessed. The percentage of fecal samples containing Staphylococcus aureus was significantly higher in IBS compared with HV. Forty-nine percent of S. aureus -positive fecal samples from patients with IBS were also positive for SAgs, compared with 12% of HV. Patients with IBS and positive fecal SAg-producing S. aureus reported higher pain scores than those without S. aureus . Moreover, increased fecal proteolytic activity was associated with abdominal pain. Fecal abundance of Paraprevotella clara and Alistipes putredinis was significantly decreased in IBS, particularly in samples with higher proteolytic activity. Patients with lower Alistipes putredinis or Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance reported more severe abdominal pain. In keeping with our preclinical findings, we show that increased presence of SAg-producing S. aureus in fecal samples of patients with IBS is associated with increased levels of abdominal pain. We also show that increased fecal proteolytic activity is associated with increased abdominal pain in patients with IBS.

Association between disturbance of self-organization and irritable bowel syndrome in Japanese population using the international trauma questionnaire

Disturbance of self-organization (DSO) is defined by affective dysregulation, negative self-concept, and disturbances in relationships. Along with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), DSO is a part of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD), which often results from childhood trauma and has life-long consequences. We investigated the association between CPTSD, PTSD, DSO, childhood adversity, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Individuals with IBS exhibited markedly higher prevalences of DSO, CPTSD, and PTSD symptoms and higher trauma scores compared with healthy individuals. The odds of having IBS were 3.718 and 1.924 times greater for those with DSO symptoms (p < .001) and CPTSD symptoms (p = .005), respectively. IBS severity was highest in the DSO group, followed by the CPTSD, PTSD, and non-DSO/CPTSD/PTSD groups. DSO symptoms mediate the impact of childhood adversity on IBS symptoms, explaining half of this effect, whereas PTSD symptoms do not. These findings suggest a significant role of DSO in the development of IBS.

Effect of physical activity on the severity of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms

Irritable bowel syndrome is a chronic gastrointestinal disease whose symptoms affect patients' daily lives. Exacerbation of symptoms can worsen patients' quality of life and lead to depressive-anxiety and somatoform disorders. The associated costs burden not only the patients, but also those around them. The etiology of IBS is multifactorial and not fully understood. The brain-gut axis remains a subject of research, which may involve the development of new, effective therapies for the treatment of IBS in the future. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods are used to treat IBS. In order to provide the patient with the best possible treatment results in the absence of significant side effects, research is being conducted on the possibilities of non-pharmacological patient management. Currently, there are numerous studies on the effect of physical activity on the severity of symptoms in IBS patients. The results show that the introduction of moderate-intensity physical activity has positive effects in terms of alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms, reducing the severity of psychological and somatoform symptoms, and improving patients' well-being as well as quality of life. Appropriate physical activity is acceptable to patients and rated by them as positive and having a beneficial effect on IBS symptoms. The lack of patient-reported significant side effects is important. Given the results of the study, it seems beneficial to recommend that IBS patients perform moderate physical activity to alleviate and control symptoms. It is necessary to educate patients and individualize physical activity recommendations to match the type of activity to patients' abilities and needs.

Nutritional safety and status following a 12-week strict low FODMAP diet in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

A low FODMAP diet (LFD) is an established dietary treatment for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, knowledge on the extended effects of the restriction phase regarding nutrient intake, symptom severity, and quality of life (QoL) is sparse. Therefore, our objectives were to evaluate the safety of a dietitian-led 12-week strict LFD on measures of blood biochemistry, nutritional status, symptom severity, and QoL. In this open-label dietitian-led 12-week strict LFD intervention for IBS patients with predominantly diarrhea or mixed stool pattern (IBS-D/-M), we collected data on diet intake (3-day dietary record), overnight fasting routine blood samples, body weight, IBS symptoms (IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS)), and IBS-related QoL (IBS-QoL) at baseline and after 12 weeks. Thirty-six participants completed the 12-week follow-up (mean age: 37 years, 67% women, IBS-SSS: 242 (101)). All blood parameters measured were within established reference values at both time points. We found no change in intake of macro- or micronutrients, but several micronutrients were below the recommendations both before and after 12 weeks. BMI slightly decreased, primarily driven by participants with BMI >25 (p < 0.005). QoL improved among most subdomains (p ≤ 0.002), except food avoidance and social reaction. An extended dietitian-guided LFD (12 weeks) is not inferior to the participants' baseline diet, since no clinically meaningful changes in nutritionally related blood samples and no changes in macro- or micronutrient intake were observed. However, the intake of several nutrients was below the recommendations at both time points indicating low diet quality.

Rome III and IV criteria are less discordant to diagnose irritable bowel syndrome in clinic patients than in community subjects.

Though Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are less sensitive; they select Rome III patients with greater severity and consultation behavior. Since severity of IBS may determine consultation behavior, we compared Rome III and IV criteria in clinic patients and compared with earlier published data from Indian community hypothesizing that the diagnostic discordance between these criteria would be less in clinic than in community. Tertiary clinic patients were screened for IBS using Hindi translated-validated Rome III and IV questionnaires; IBS symptom severity scores (IBS-SSS) was also assessed. Diagnostic discordance between Rome III and IV criteria for IBS was compared with earlier published Indian community data. Of 110 clinic patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders, 72 met IBS criteria (47 [42.7%], 22 [20%] and three [2.7%] both Rome III and IV criteria, Rome III criteria only and Rome IV criteria only, respectively). In contrast, of 40 IBS subjects from Indian community published earlier, nine (22.5%), 28 (70%) and three (7.5%) fulfilled both Rome III and IV, Rome III only, Rome IV onlycriteria, respectively. Clinic patients with IBS fulfilling both Rome III and IV criteria or Rome IV criteria had higher IBS-SSS than those fulfilling Rome III criteria only (295.3 ± 80.7 vs. 205.6 ± 65.7; p < 0.00001). This difference was primarily related to pain severity and number of days with pain. Discordance between Rome IV and Rome III criteria in tertiary care clinic patients is less than in community subjects with IBS in India.

The aging gastrointestinal tract: Epidemiology and clinical significance of disorders of gut-brain interaction in the older general population.

Most previous reports on the prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) show higher rates in younger individuals. Exceptions are faecal incontinence and functional constipation. To compare prevalence rates for 22 DGBI and 24 primary symptoms, by age, using the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology (RFGES) study dataset. The RFGES dataset enables diagnosis of 22 DGBI among 54,127 participants (≥18 years) in 26 countries. Older age was defined as ≥65 years. We assessed differences between age groups by sex, geographic region, somatisation, abnormal anxiety and depression scores, quality of life (QoL), individual gastrointestinal symptoms and disease severity for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Rates for any DGBI were 41.9% and 31.9% in the <65 and ≥65 age groups, respectively. For all Rome IV diagnoses except faecal incontinence, rates were higher in the younger group. The older group had lower scores for any DGBI by geographic region, non-gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, abnormal anxiety and depression scores, and IBS severity, and better scores for QoL. The mean number of endorsed symptoms and their frequency were higher in the younger group. In this large general population study, the prevalence and impact of DGBI, apart from faecal incontinence, were higher in the younger group. Despite this, DGBI rates are still high in absolute terms in the ≥65 age group and necessitate clinical awareness and, perhaps, an age-specific treatment approach.

Gut microbial signatures of patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and their healthy relatives

Abstract Aims Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, encompassing diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). Here, we utilized 16S rDNA gene sequencing to identify potential microbial drivers of IBS-D. Methods and Results A total of 30 healthy relatives and 27 patients with IBS-D were recruited. Clinical data and fecal samples were collected from patients and controls. 16S rDNA gene sequencing was performed to obtain fecal bacterial data. Differences in community composition were evaluated utilizing analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare differences in taxa and functional pathways. Finally, the key gut microbiota was identified using the random forest algorithm. Gut microbiota diversity, estimated through the Observe, Chao1, and abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) indices, was significantly lower in the IBS-D patients than in the healthy relatives. ANOSIM analysis further confirmed significant differences in the composition of the gut microbiota between IBS-D patients and healthy relatives, with an R value of 0.106 and a P-value of 0.005. Notably, the IBS-D patients exhibited a significant enrichment of specific bacterial genera, including Fusicatenibacter, Streptococcus, and Klebsiella, which may possess potential pathogenic properties. In particular, the bacterial genus Klebsiella demonstrated a positive correlation with irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system scores. Conversely, healthy subjects showed enrichment of bacterial genera such as Alistipes, Akkermansia, and Dialister, which may be beneficial bacteria in IBS-D. Utilizing the random forest model, we developed a discriminative model for IBS-D based on differential bacterial genera. This model exhibited impressive performance, with an area under the curve value of 0.90. Additionally, our analysis did not reveal any gender-specific differences in the microbiota community composition among IBS-D patients. Conclusions Our findings offer preliminary insights into the potential relationship between intestinal microbiota and IBS-D. The identification model for IBS-D, grounded in gut microbiota, holds promising prospects for improving early diagnosis of IBS-D.

Effectiveness of a Balanced Nine-Strain Synbiotic in Primary-Care Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients-A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The aim of the study was to characterize effects of a multi-strain synbiotic in patients with moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) of all stool form types. A total of 202 adult IBS patients were randomized (1:1) and after a four-week treatment-free run-in phase and were treated either with the synbiotic or a placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoints were the assessment of the severity of IBS symptoms (IBS-SSS) and the improvement of IBS global symptoms (IBS-GIS). Secondary endpoints comprised adequate relief (IBS-AR scale), stool form type (Bristol Stool Form Scale), bowel movements, severity of abdominal pain and bloating, stool pressure, feeling of incomplete stool evacuation, and adverse events. A total of 201 patients completed the study. Synbiotic treatment, in comparison to placebo, significantly improved IBS-SSS and IBS-GIS scores. At the end of the treatment, 70% of patients in the synbiotic group achieved adequate relief. After 12 weeks of treatment, the secondary endpoints were favorably differentiated in the synbiotic group when compared with the placebo group. Two patients in the synbiotic group reported transient adverse events (headache). The results indicate that treatment of IBS patients with the synbiotic significantly improved all major symptoms of IBS and was well-tolerated. The ClinicalTrials.gov registration was NCT05731232.

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial on Lactobacillus-containing cultured milk drink as adjuvant therapy for depression in irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is frequently linked with coexisting mental illnesses. Our previous study discovered that 32.1% of IBS patients had subthreshold depression (SD), placing them at higher risk of developing major depression. Gut microbiota modulation through psychobiotics was found to influence depression via the gut-brain axis. However, the efficacy of lessening depression among IBS patients remains ambiguous. The study’s aim was to investigate the roles of cultured milk drinks containing 109 cfu Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Lactobacillus paracasei L. CASEI-01 on depression and related variables among IBS participants with SD. A total of 110 IBS participants with normal mood (NM) and SD, were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups: IBS-NM with placebo, IBS-NM with probiotic, IBS-SD with placebo, and IBS-SD with probiotic. Each participant was required to consume two bottles of cultured milk every day for a duration of 12 weeks. The following outcomes were assessed: depression risk, quality of life, the severity of IBS, and hormonal changes. The depression scores were significantly reduced in IBS-SD with probiotic and placebo from baseline (p < 0.001). Only IBS-SD with probiotic showed a significant rise in serotonin serum levels (p < 0.05). A significantly higher life quality measures were seen in IBS-SD with probiotic, IBS-SD with placebo, and IBS-NM with placebo (p < 0.05). All groups, both placebo and probiotic, reported significant improvement in IBS severity post-intervention with a higher prevalence of remission and mild IBS (p < 0.05). Dual strains lactobacillus-containing cultured milk drink via its regulation of relevant biomarkers, is a potential anti-depressive prophylactic agent for IBS patients at risk.

A low FODMAP diet plus traditional dietary advice versus a low-carbohydrate diet versus pharmacological treatment in irritable bowel syndrome (CARIBS): a single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Dietary advice and medical treatments are recommended to patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Studies have not yet compared the efficacy of dietary treatment with pharmacological treatment targeting the predominant IBS symptom. We therefore aimed to compare the effects of two restrictive dietary treatment options versus optimised medical treatment in people with IBS. This single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted in a specialised outpatient clinic at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Participants (aged ≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe IBS (Rome IV; IBS Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] ≥175) and no other serious diseases or food allergies were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by web-based randomisation to receive a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) plus traditional IBS dietary advice recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (hereafter the LFTD diet), a fibre-optimised diet low in total carbohydrates and high in protein and fat (hereafter the low-carbohydrate diet), or optimised medical treatment based on predominant IBS symptom. Participants were masked to the names of the diets, but the pharmacological treatment was open-label. The intervention lasted 4 weeks, after which time participants in the dietary interventions were unmasked to their diets and encouraged to continue during 6 months' follow-up, participants in the LFTD group were instructed on how to reintroduce FODMAPs, and participants receiving pharmacological treatment were offered diet counselling and to continue with their medication. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who responded to the 4-week intervention, defined as a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS relative to baseline, and was analysed per modified intention-to-treat (ie, all participants who started the intervention). Safety was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970591, and is complete. Between Jan 24, 2017, and Sept 2, 2021, 1104 participants were assessed for eligibility and 304 were randomly assigned. Ten participants did not receive their intervention after randomisation and thus 294 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (96 assigned to the LFTD diet, 97 to the low-carbohydrate diet, and 101 to optimised medical treatment). 241 (82%) of 294 participants were women and 53 (18%) were men and the mean age was 38 (SD 13). After 4 weeks, 73 (76%) of 96 participants in the LFTD diet group, 69 (71%) of 97 participants in the low-carbohydrate diet group, and 59 (58%) of 101 participants in the optimised medical treatment group had a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS compared with baseline, with a significant difference between the groups (p=0·023). 91 (95%) of 96 participants completed 4 weeks in the LFTD group, 92 (95%) of 97 completed 4 weeks in the low-carbohydrate group, and 91 (90%) of 101 completed 4 weeks in the optimised medical treatment group. Two individuals in each of the intervention groups stated that adverse events were the reason for discontinuing the 4-week intervention. Five (5%) of 91 participants in the optimised medical treatment group stopped treatment prematurely due to side-effects. No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Two 4-week dietary interventions and optimised medical treatment reduced the severity of IBS symptoms, with a larger effect size in the diet groups. Dietary interventions might be considered as an initial treatment for patients with IBS. Research is needed to enable personalised treatment strategies. The Healthcare Board Region Västra Götaland, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, AFA Insurance, grants from the Swedish state, the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Science Foundation, Skandia, the Dietary Science Foundation, and the Nanna Swartz Foundation.

The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in predicting the resilience, symptom severity, and quality of life of patients with irritable bowel syndrome

BackgroundPsychosocial stressors contribute to the development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and exacerbate the symptoms. The capability to cope with stress is an essential element in the management of IBS. This study assessed nine cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) and their role in predicting symptom severity, quality of life (QOL), and resilience in IBS subjects. MethodsThe scores regarding nine subscales of CERS were obtained by cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ) and compared between study patients based on the severity and subtypes of IBS using one-way ANOVA. To evaluate the predictive role of CERS, logistic regression was performed. The correlation between CERS and the QOL was assessed by Pearson correlation analysis. The score of resilience was measured by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). ResultsWe recruited 100 patients diagnosed with IBS based on ROME IV criteria. Among nine subscales of CERS, patients with more severe symptoms scored higher in catastrophizing (p < 0.001) and blaming others (p = 0.015) while lower in positive reappraisal (p = 0.028). Blaming others was the only predictor of resilience and severity of IBS in our patients (odds ratio (OR): -2.103, p=0.028, and OR:1.715, p = 0.049, respectively). We observed significant negative correlations between the quality of life and rumination (r= -0.202, p=0.044), self-blame (r= -0.241, p=0.016), catastrophizing (r= -0.342, p<0.001), and blaming others (r= -0.219, p=0.028). ConclusionMaladaptive strategies are more common in IBS patients with more severe symptoms and have negative correlations with the QOL. Blaming others has the potential to predict the resilience and severity of symptoms in IBS patients.

THE MOST COMMON DISORDERS OF THE INTESTINE-BRAIN AXIS IN PATIENTS WITH GLUTEN-DEPENDENT DISEASES ON THE BACKGROUND OF MEDICAL NUTRITION AND THE POSSIBILITY OF THEIR CORRECTION

Background. At least 20% of people with celiac disease (CD) continue to experience symptoms during a gluten-free diet (GFD). Other estimates indicate that more than one-third of individuals with celiac disease have symptoms similar to those seen in disorders of gut-brain interaction (particularly irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or functional dyspepsia). Similarly, approximately 25% of individuals with non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) continue to have unexplained complaints during a GFD.&#x0D; Aim: To investigate and evaluate the potential correction of IBS-like symptoms in patients with celiac disease and NCGS adhering to a GFD using a probiotic.&#x0D; Materials and Methods. The study included 42 adult participants, of whom 22 (52.38%) had celiac disease, and 20 (47.62%) had NCGS. Patient surveys, using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS), were conducted in April-May 2023 before and after the administration of a multi-strain probiotic containing Lactobacillus plantarum CECT7484, Lactobacillus plantarum CECT7485, Pediococcus acidilactici CECT7483 - at least 3x10⁹ CFU. The duration of the probiotic treatment was 30 days. The data obtained were processed using the "Statistica 10.0" software package.&#x0D; Results. After a 30-day course of probiotic intake, a significant reduction in the severity of IBS-like symptoms (p=0.00005) was observed in the majority of patients with gluten-sensitive pathology according to the IBS-SSS questionnaire: symptom reduction was noted in 29 patients (69%), no change in condition in 7 patients (17%), worsening of the condition and increased severity of complaints in 6 patients (14%). The severity of IBS-like symptoms determined the treatment response: in patients with IBS and more pronounced symptoms, the probiotic showed significantly greater effectiveness, particularly in cases with pronounced complaints (bloating, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain) (p=0.009376) and in moderate cases (p=0.000379). The probiotic most effectively influenced bloating in both patient groups (p=0.003699).&#x0D; Conclusion. The combination of two strains of Lactobacillus plantarum (CECT7484 and CECT7485) and one strain of Pediococcus acidilactici (CECT7483) can be effectively used to correct IBS-like complaints in patients with celiac disease and NCGS who have complaints despite adhering to a GFD.