The purpose of the article is to study the essence of physical law. It is assumed that the modern era gave rise to a special type of theoretical constructions that nominally inherit the notions of lawfulness known since Antiquity (“regularity,” “orderliness,” “cyclicality,” etc.), but in fact they are arranged fundamentally differently. The perspective within which the authors expect to determine its specificity is outlined in the Quentin Meillassoux’s After Finitude, where an attempt was made to combine the “contingency of beings” with the stability and immutability of physical laws discovered by the experimental science of modern time. However, the authors of the article move away from the speculative solution proposed by Meillassoux and suggest that the guarantee of the stability of physical laws is contained in the very “mathematized scientific statement,” the justification of which Meillassoux is looking for at the level of philosophical speculation. This guarantee emerges from the mid-18th century, during the so-called quiet scientific revolution, when, thanks primarily to the efforts of Leonhard Euler and Joseph Louis Lagrange, the laws of nature began to be formulated using the apparatus of differential equations. This circumstance makes it possible to explain the stability of the physical law under conditions of the contingency of beings, since the solution to the differential equation may turn out to be unstable, irregular and chaotic motion trajectories. This possibility is a consequence of the specific structure of the differential equation, which makes it possible to relate arbitrarily complex, arbitrary changes in physical quantities. As a result, the law of nature, formulated through a differential relation between physical quantities, does not describe regular, repeatable motion, but fixes arbitrary changes of being, without violating that relation. Thus, it is the mathematical form in which the law of nature is expressed that makes it stable and thereby turns it into a mechanism for expressing contingent beings.
Read full abstract