Radiotherapy Schedules Research Articles

Subclinical cardiac damage monitoring in breast cancer patients treated with an anthracycline-based chemotherapy receiving left-sided breast radiation therapy: subgroup analysis from a phase 3 trial.

This study, derived from the phase 3 SAFE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT2236806), explores subclinical cardiac damage in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy and left-sided breast radiation therapy (RT). Eligible patients were randomized to a cardioprotective pharmacological therapy (bisoprolol, ramipril, or both) or placebo, with cardiac surveillance at multiple time-point using standard and 3-dimensional echocardiography. Dosimetric parameters were analysed, including mean heart dose (MHD) and various metrics for heart substructures, employing advanced contouring techniques and auto-contouring software. In the analysis of left-sided breast RT patients, the study encompassed 39 out of 46 irradiated individuals, focusing on GLS and 3D-LVEF outcomes with ≥ 10% worsening, defined as subclinical heart damage. Distinct RT schedules were used, with placebo exhibiting the highest ≥ 10% worsening (36.4%). In terms of treatment arms, bisoprolol exhibited 11.1% worsening, while ramipril 16.7% and bisoprolol + ramipril 25%. For patients with no subclinical damage, the mean MHD was 1.5Gy; for patients with subclinical heart damage, the mean MHD was 1.6Gy (p = 0.94). Dosimetric parameters related to heart and heart substructures (left anterior descending artery, right and left atrium, right and left ventricle) showed no statistically significant differences between patients with and without subclinical damage. Our results emphasize the crucial role of cardioprotective measures in mitigating adverse effects, highlighting RT as having negligible influence on cardiac performance. An extended follow-up assessment of the whole series is warranted to determine whether a subclinical effect could significantly influence clinical outcomes and cardiac events.

Impact of the radiotherapy rhythm on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective The role of chronoradiobiology in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been fully elucidated. We sought to investigate the impact of radiotherapy rhythm on the survival outcomes of individuals to explore a chronomodulated radiation strategy to improve prognosis of NPC. Methods A cohort comprising non-metastatic NPC patients subjected to intensity-modulated radiotherapy at Fujian Cancer Hospital between Jan. 2016 and Dec. 2019 was assembled. Rhythmic fluctuation of radiotherapy (RFRT) was quantified based on the temporal distribution of radiation delivery. Cox proportional hazard model was performed to explore the impact of radiotherapy rhythm on all-cause mortality. The maximally selected rank statistics method was employed to discern an optimal cutoff. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of observed associations. Results Our analysis encompassed 2245 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 55 months, during which 315 individuals succumbed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis unveiled a significant correlation between prolonged RFRT and heightened mortality risk in NPC patients (HR, 1.17, 95% CI, 1.07-1.27, p < .001), a relationship robust to comprehensive adjustment for confounding variables. A cutoff value of 3 h was selected for potential clinical application, beyond which patients exhibited markedly poorer survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses consistently underscored the directional consistency of observed effects. Conclusion Our study sheds light on the potential advantages of scheduling radiotherapy sessions at consistent times. These findings have implications for optimizing radiotherapy schedules and warrant further investigation into personalized chronotherapy approaches in NPC management.

Exploring the feasibility of preoperative tumor-bed boost, oncoplastic surgery, and adjuvant radiotherapy schedule in early-stage breast cancer: A phase II clinical trial.

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) improves satisfaction in patients who would fare otherwise sub-optimal cosmetic outcome, while brings challenge in tumor-bed identification during adjuvant radiotherapy. The ultra-hypofractionated breast radiotherapy further shortens treatment sessions from moderately hypofractionated regimens. To circumscribe the difficulty in tumor-bed contouring and the additional toxicity from larger boost volumes, we propose to move forward the boost session preoperatively from the adjuvant radiation part. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a new treatment paradigm of preoperative primary-tumor boost before breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or OBCS followed by adjuvant ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (u-WBRT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer. There was a phase II study. Patients younger than 55 years old, with a biopsy confirmed mono-centric breast cancer, without lymph node involvement were enrolled. Preoperative primary-tumor boost was given by a single 10Gy in 1 fraction, and BCS or OBCS was conducted within two weeks afterwards. Adjuvant u-WBRT (26Gy/5.2Gy/5f) was given in 6 weeks postoperatively without any boost, after the full recovery from surgery. Surgical complications and patient-reported outcomes, as assessed via Breast-Q questionnaires, were documented. A propensity score matching approach was employed to identify a control group at a 1:1 ratio for BREAST-Q outcomes comparison. From May 2022 to September 2023, 36 patients were prospectively enrolled. Surgical complications were observed in 7 cases (19.4%), including 3 cases with Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade 1-2 and 4 cases with CD grade 3 complications. All but four patients (11.1%) started the planned u-WBRT within one week after the pre-defined due dates postoperatively (≤49d). Four patients (11.1%) developed grade 2 radiodermatitis after chemotherapy initiation. Compared to the study group, the control patients reported higher scores in chest physical well-being (P=0.045) and in their attitudes towards arm swelling (P=0.01). No significant difference was detected in the other of domains (Satisfaction with Breasts, Sexual and Psychosocial Well-Being, and Adverse Effects of Radiation). With a median follow-up period of 9.8 months (2.4-18.9mo), none had any sign of relapse. This Phase II clinical trial confirmed the technical and safety feasibility of novel radiation schedule in patients undergoing BCS or OBCS. According to the BREAST-Q questionnaire, patients who underwent novel radiation schedules reported lower satisfaction in chest physical well-being. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to further investigate these findings. Additionally, long-term follow-up is required to assess oncological outcomes.

Choosing Wisely Between Radiotherapy Dose-Fractionation Schedules: The Molecular Graded Prognostic Assessment for Elderly Glioblastoma Patients.

This study aimed to develop a graded prognostic assessment (GPA) model integrating genomic characteristics for elderly patients with glioblastoma (eGBM), and to compare the efficacy of different radiotherapy schedules. This multi-institutional retrospective study included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with or without temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed eGBM. Based on the significant factors identified in the multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), the molecular GPA for eGBM (eGBM-molGPA) was established. A total of 334 and 239 patients who underwent conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) were included, respectively, with 86% of patients receiving TMZ-based chemoradiation. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months (range, 3.3-149.9), the median OS was 18.7 months for CFRT+TMZ group, 15.1 months for HFRT+TMZ group, and 10.4 months for radiotherapy alone group (CFRT+TMZ vs. HFRT+TMZ: HR 1.52, p<0.001; CFRT+TMZ vs. radiotherapy alone: HR 2.52, p<0.001). In a combined analysis with the NOA-08 and NORDIC trials, CFRT+TMZ group exhibited the highest survival rates among all treatment groups. The eGBM-molGPA, which integrated four clinical and three molecular parameters, stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. CFRT+TMZ significantly improved OS compared to HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone in the low-risk (p=0.023) and intermediate-risk groups (p<0.001). However, in the high-risk group, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment options (p=0.770). CFRT+TMZ may be more effective than HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone for selected eGBM patients. The novel eGBM-molGPA model can guide treatment selection for this patient population.

Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy in the Era of Modern Cancer Care for NSCLC.

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher radiation doses administered over longer periods have shown modest survival benefits. These findings stem from studies conducted before the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in clinical practice. Currently, there are no large prospective studies specifically dedicated to palliative radiotherapy conducted in this new treatment era. Modern radiotherapy technologies are now widely available and are increasingly used for palliative purposes in selected patients, reflecting the expanded array of therapeutic options for disseminated NSCLC and improved prognosis. Some traditional tenets of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, such as the improvement of overall survival with a protracted radiation schedule and the use of simple, cost-effective radiation techniques for palliative purposes, may no longer hold true for patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The application of IMRT or SBRT in the context of palliative radiotherapy for NSCLC is not yet sufficiently explored, and this is addressed in this review. Moreover, new risks associated with combining palliative radiotherapy with these systemic treatments are being explored and are discussed within the context of palliative care. The optimal timing, doses, fractionation schedules, and treatment volumes for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy are currently subjects of investigation. In emergencies, radiotherapy should be used as a life-saving measure without delay. However, for other indications of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, decisions regarding doses, timing relative to systemic treatments, and treatment volumes should be made in a multidisciplinary context, considering the patient's prognosis, anticipated outcomes, and access to potentially effective treatments. We still lack robust data from prospective studies on this matter. This review examines and discusses available evidence on the use of palliative thoracic radiotherapy within the framework of modern treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Long-term Results of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Intra-prostatic Boosts in Men With Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Trial

AimsIn the conventionally fractionated phase III FLAME prostate trial, focal boosts improved local control and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS). We explored the toxicity and effectiveness of a moderately hypofractionated schedule with focal boosts. Material and methodsBIOPROP20 is a phase II single-arm non-randomised trial for intermediate- to very high-risk localised prostate cancer patients with bulky tumour volumes. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-choline positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans were used for staging and boost volume definition. Patients were treated with 60Gy in 20 fractions with a boost dose up to 68Gy. Five patients with positive lymph nodes on the PET-CT scan received radiotherapy to pelvic lymph nodes (45Gy to elective nodes, boosted up to 50Gy to involved nodes). Primary outcomes were acute (≤18 weeks) and late urinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, prospectively recorded up to 5 years with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4 (CTCAE). Secondary outcomes were biochemical or clinical progression, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Results61 patients completed radiotherapy with hormone therapy (range: 6–36 months). Cumulative acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity was low at 6.6% and 5.0%, respectively. Cumulative acute and late urinary toxicity was 49.2% and 30.1%, respectively; the prevalence reduced to 5.9% at 5 years. At 5 years: 6 patients had biochemical progression (bDFS: 88.5%; 95% CI: 80.2–97.6%), the MFS was 82.4% (95% CI: 73.0–92.9%), 5 patients died (OS: 91.2%; 95% CI: 84.1–98.9%), one with prostate cancer. The prostate, boost, nodal planning volumes, and the organs at risk (rectum, bowel, urethra, and bladder) met the optimal protocol dose constraints. There was a trend to increased urinary toxicity with increasing urethral (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 0.73–5.22, p = 0.18), but not bladder dose. ConclusionFocal boosts with a 20 fraction hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy schedule are associated with an acceptable risk of gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity and achieve good cancer control. ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02125175.

Parallel explorations in LA-NSCLC: Chemoradiation dose-response optimisation considering immunotherapy and cardiac toxicity sparing

Background and purposeChemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has undergone advances, including increased overall survival (OS) when combined with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), and using cardiac-sparing techniques to reduce the radiotoxicity. This research investigated 1) how radiotherapy schedules can be optimised with CRT-ICB schemes, and 2) how cardiac-sparing might change the OS for concurrent CRT (cCRT). Methods and materialsSurvival data and dosimetric indices were sourced from published studies, with 2-year OS standardised and the hazard ratio of mean heart dose (MHD) against radiotoxicity tabulated in purpose. A published CRT dose–response model was selected, then modified with ICB and cardiac-sparing hypotheses. Models were maximum likelihood fitted, then visualised the prediction outcomes after bootstrapping. ResultsThe modelled 2-year OS rate of cCRT-ICB reached 71 % (95 % confidence intervals, CI 62 %, 84 %) and 66 % (95 % CI: 53 %, 81 %) for stage IIIA and IIIB/C, respectively, given 60 Gy in 2 Gy-per-fraction. 60 Gy in 30 fractions remained the best schedule for cCRT-ICB, whereas modest dose de-escalation to 55 Gy only reduced the OS in 2 %. Sequential CRT (sCRT)-ICB provided 6 % OS increases versus the best OS rate achieved by sCRT alone. Photon MHD-sparing achieved a 5–10 % increase in modelled 2-year OS, with protons providing a further roughly 5–10 % increase. ConclusionNeither dose-escalation nor de-escalation relative to 60 Gy in 30 fractions influenced the survival with cCRT-ICB, while 5 Gy dose de-escalation might benefit patients with heavily irradiated organs at risk. Cardiac-sparing improved OS, and protons provided advantages for tumours anatomically overlapped or lay below the heart.

Evaluating a hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule for prostate cancer at an institution in South Africa

Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) has logistical and cost advantages, especially in a resource constrained setting. Studies have demonstrated equivalent efficacy with HFRT schedules using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) as treatment modality. However, higher rates of acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity have been reported when compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). In this study, we evaluate the efficacy and toxicity rates of a HFRT schedule using 3D conformal radiotherapy (RT) as treatment modality.Aim: With this study, we aim to describe the safety and outcomes of a definitive HFRT schedule used for localised PCa. We hypothesise that there is no difference in the biochemical relapse rate and incidence rates of normal tissue toxicities between patients receiving CFRT and HFRT schedules.Setting: This RT schedule was used at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in South Africa for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.Methods: This is a retrospective study in which the records of patients diagnosed with localised PCa were reviewed. Patients were treated with either CFRT regimen to a total of 74Gy in 37 daily fractions for 5 days a week or a HFRT regimen to a total of 65Gy in 26 daily fractions for 4 days per week.Results: In all, 116 patients were included in the study with a median follow-up of 57.2 months from the start of RT. No statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) and biochemical relapse-free survival were found between the two schedules. A significant difference in acute GI toxicity was observed, with a higher incidence noted in the HFRT schedule. No significant differences were observed in late GI toxicity or in early and late GU toxicities.Conclusion: This study observes a hypofractionated regimen using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) with similar efficacy and RT-related toxicities to CFRT.Contribution: The HFRT schedule used in this study could be useful in hospitals with limited access to resources.

Targeting the Tumor Vascular Supply to Enhance Radiation Therapy Administered in Single or Clinically Relevant Fractionated Schedules.

This pre-clinical study was designed to demonstrate how vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) should be administered, either alone or when combined with radiation in clinically relevant fractionated radiation schedules, for the optimal anti-tumor effect. CDF1 mice, implanted in the right rear foot with a 200 mm3 murine C3H mammary carcinoma, were injected with various doses of the most potent VDA drug, combretastatin A-1 phosphate (CA1P), under different schedules. Tumors were also locally irradiated with single-dose, or stereotactic (3 × 5-20 Gy) or conventional (30 × 2 Gy) fractionation schedules. Tumor growth and control were the endpoints used. Untreated tumors had a tumor growth time (TGT5; time to grow to 5 times the original treatment volume) of around 6 days. This increased with increasing drug doses (5-100 mg/kg). However, with single-drug treatments, the maximum TGT5 was only 10 days, yet this increased to 19 days when injecting the drug on a weekly basis or as three treatments in one week. CA1P enhanced radiation response regardless of the schedule or interval between the VDA and radiation. There was a dose-dependent increase in radiation response when the combined with a single, stereotactic, or conventional fractionated irradiation, but these enhancements plateaued at around a drug dose of 25 mg/kg. This pre-clinical study demonstrated how VDAs should be combined with clinically applicable fractionated radiation schedules for the optimal anti-tumor effect, thus suggesting the necessary pre-clinical testing required to ultimately establish VDAs in clinical practice.

Mechanistic in silico explorations of the immunogenic and synergistic effects of radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a critical review.

Immunotherapy is a rapidly evolving field, with many models attempting to describe its impact on the immune system, especially when paired with radiotherapy. Tumor response to this combination involves a complex spatiotemporal dynamic which makes either clinical or pre-clinical in vivo investigation across the resulting extensive solution space extremely difficult. In this review, several in silico models of the interaction between radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and the patient's immune system are examined. The study included only mathematical models published in English that investigated the effects of radiotherapy on the immune system, or the effect of immuno-radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The findings indicate that treatment efficacy was predicted to improve when both radiotherapy and immunotherapy were administered, compared to radiotherapy or immunotherapy alone. However, the models do not agree on the optimal schedule and fractionation of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. This corresponds to relevant clinical trials, which report an improved treatment efficacy with combination therapy, however, the optimal scheduling varies between clinical trials. This discrepancy between the models can be attributed to the variation in model approach and the specific cancer types modeled, making the determination of the optimum general treatment schedule and model challenging. Further research needs to be conducted with similar data sets to evaluate the best model and treatment schedule for a specific cancer type and stage.

Ultrahypofractionation in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: A single-institution retrospective cohort series.

The 'FAST-forward', study published in April 2020, demonstrated the effectiveness of an extremely hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule, delivering the total radiation dose in five sessions over the course of 1 week. We share our department's experience regarding patients treated with this regimen in real-world clinical settings, detailing outcomes related to short-term toxicity and efficacy. A descriptive observational study was conducted on 160 patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Between July 2020 and December 2021, patients underwent conservative surgery followed by a regimen of 26 Gy administered in five daily fractions. The median age was 64 years (range: 43-83), with 82 patients (51.3%) treated for left-sided breast cancer, 77 patients (48.1%) for right-sided breast cancer, and 1 instance (0.6%) of bilateral breast cancer. Of these, 66 patients had pT1c (41.3%), 70.6% were infiltrative ductal carcinomas, and 11.3% were ductal carcinoma insitu. Most tumours exhibited intermediate grade (41.9%), were hormone receptor positive (81.3%), had low Ki-67 (Ki-67 < 20%; 51.9%) and were Her 2 negative (85%). The majority of surgical margins were negative (99.4%). Among the patients, 72.5% received hormonotherapy, and 23.8% received chemotherapy. Additionally, 26 patients (16.3%) received an additional tumour boost following whole breast irradiation (WHBI) of 10 Gy administered in five sessions of 2 Gy over a week. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 899 cm3 (range: 110-2509 cm3). Early toxicity was primarily grade I radiodermatitis, affecting 117 patients (73.1%). During a median follow-up of 15 months (range: 3.9-28.77), only one patient experienced a local relapse, which required mastectomy. The implementation of this highly hypofractionated regimen in early-stage breast cancer appears feasible and demonstrates minimal early toxicity. However, a more extended follow-up duration would be required to evaluate long-term toxicity and efficacy accurately.

Quality of palliative radiotherapy assessed using quality indicators: a multicenter survey†.

We sought to identify potential evidence-practice gaps in palliative radiotherapy using quality indicators (QIs), previously developed using a modified Delphi method. Seven QIs were used to assess the quality of radiotherapy for bone metastases (BoM) and brain metastases (BrM). Compliance rate was calculated as the percentage of patients for whom recommended medical care was conducted. Random effects models were used to estimate the pooled compliance rates. Of the 39 invited radiation oncologists, 29 (74%) from 29 centers participated in the survey; 13 (45%) were academic and 16 (55%) were non-academic hospitals. For the QIs, except for BoM-4, the pooled compliance rates were higher than 80%; however, for at least some of the centers, the compliance rate was lower than these pooled rates. For BoM-4 regarding steroid use concurrent with radiotherapy for malignant spinal cord compression, the pooled compliance rate was as low as 32%. For BoM-1 regarding the choice of radiation schedule, the compliance rate was higher in academic hospitals than in non-academic hospitals (P= 0.021). For BrM-3 regarding the initiation of radiotherapy without delay, the compliance rate was lower in academic hospitals than in non-academic hospitals (P= 0.016). In conclusion, overall, compliance rates were high; however, for many QIs, practice remains to be improved in at least some centers. Steroids are infrequently used concurrently with radiotherapy for malignant spinal cord compression.

TRLS-03. A PHASE 1/2 STUDY ASSESSING SAFETY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF CEMIPLIMAB IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY SOLID OR CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM TUMORS AND SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CEMIPLIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA, NEWLY DIAGNOSED HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA, OR RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND We investigated, for the first time, combination PD-1 inhibition (cemiplimab) and radiation therapy (RT) followed by cemiplimab monotherapy in children with solid tumors, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and high-grade glioma (HGG). METHODS We conducted a multicenter study through the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium. Phase 1 established the safety/pharmacokinetics of cemiplimab monotherapy in children (&amp;lt;18 years) with recurrent solid and central-nervous-system (CNS) tumors. Phase 2 evaluated cemiplimab/RT in children and young adults (3-25 years) with newly diagnosed (nd) DIPG, ndHGG or recurrent HGG (rHGG). Patients with ndDIPG and ndHGG were randomized to hypofractionated RT (hfRT) or conventionally fractionated RT (cRT). Primary endpoints included overall survival at 12 months (OS12) for ndDIPG and rHGG and progression-free survival at 12 months (PFS12) for ndHGG. Correlates included quality-of-life, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), immunogenicity, and PD-1 pathway components. RESULTS 25 patients (solid tumors, n=8; CNS tumors, n=17) were treated in phase 1; serum drug concentrations were comparable to adults. 32 patients were treated in phase 2. OS12 was 33.3% for ndDIPG treated with cemiplimab/hfRT (n=6), 0.0% for ndDIPG with cemiplimab/cRT (n=5), and 31.3% for rHGG (n=9). PFS12 was not estimable for ndHGG treated with cemiplimab/hfRT (n=5) and 20.0% for ndHGG treated with cemiplimab/cRT (n=7). 20 patients (35.1%) had grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and 13 (22.8%) had serious TRAEs. The most frequent grade 3/4 TRAE was decreased lymphocyte count (n=4 [7.0%]). 12 patients (21.1%) demonstrated treatment-emergent pseudo-progression, 2 (3.5%) grade 3/4. The most frequent serious TRAE was pseudo-progression (n=3 [5.3%]). CONCLUSIONS Cemiplimab/RT did not demonstrate an improvement in OS (ndDIPG and rHGG) or PFS (ndHGG), leading to early stopping for futility. However, the combination was tolerable, demonstrated similar outcomes across RT schedules, and showed similar exposure in serum compared to adults. Biologic and clinical correlate analyses are underway.

Comparative evaluation of three palliative external beam radiotherapy schedules in painful bone metastases

Comparative evaluation of three palliative external beam radiotherapy schedules in painful bone metastases

Implementation of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules for breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands

Background and purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an accelerated recommendation to use five-fraction radiotherapy schedules, according to the FAST- and FAST-Forward trial. In this study, trends in the use of different radiotherapy schedules in the Netherlands were studied, as well as the likelihood of receiving five fractions. Materials and methodsData from the NABON Breast Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy and Netherlands Cancer Registry was used. Women receiving radiotherapy for their primary invasive breast cancer or DCIS between 01–01-2020 and 31–12-2021 were included. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between patient-, tumour-, treatment-, and radiotherapy institution-related characteristics and the likelihood of receiving five fractions in tumours meeting the FAST and FAST-Forward criteria. ResultsDetailed information about radiotherapy treatment was available for 9,392 tumours. Shortly after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e. April 2020, 19% of the tumours being treated with radiotherapy received five fractions of 5.2 or 5.7 Gray (Gy). While only 3% of the tumours received five fractions in March 2020. The usage of five fractions increased to 26% in December 2021. Partial breast irradiation, compared to whole breast irradiation, was significantly associated with the administration of five fractions, as well as radiotherapy delivered in an academic radiotherapy institution compared to an independent institution. ConclusionThe start of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with the early use of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules. After publication of the trials, and mainly after the recommendation by the national radiotherapy society, the implementation further increased. These schedules were not yet used in all patients meeting the eligibility criteria for the FAST- or FAST-Forward trial.

ADRIATIC: Durvalumab (D) as consolidation treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

LBA5 Background: The standard of care (SoC) for pts with LS-SCLC is concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) ± prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). ADRIATIC (NCT03703297), a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, multicenter, global study, assessed D ± tremelimumab (T) as consolidation tx for pts with LS-SCLC who had not progressed after cCRT. Here we report results for D vs PBO from the first planned interim analysis (IA). Methods: Eligible pts had stage I–III LS-SCLC (stage I/II inoperable) and WHO performance status 0/1, and had not progressed after cCRT. PCI was permitted before randomization. Pts were randomized 1–42 days after cCRT to D 1500 mg + PBO, D 1500 mg + T 75 mg, or PBO + PBO every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 4 cycles, followed by D (D±T arms) or PBO Q4W until investigator-determined progression or intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 24 months (mo). The first 600 pts were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio; subsequent pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to D or PBO. Randomization was stratified by stage (I/II vs III) and receipt of PCI (yes vs no). The dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS (blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1) for D vs PBO. OS and PFS for D+T vs PBO were alpha-controlled secondary endpoints. Results: 730 pts were randomized, including 264 to D and 266 to PBO. Baseline characteristics and prior tx were well balanced between arms. Radiation schedule in the D vs PBO arms was once daily in 73.9% vs 70.3% of pts and twice daily in 26.1% vs 29.7%; 53.8% of pts in each arm received PCI. At this IA (data cutoff 15Jan2024), median (range) duration of follow-up for OS and PFS in censored pts was 37.2 (0.1–60.9) and 27.6 (0.0–55.8) mo, respectively. OS was significantly improved with D vs PBO (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.57–0.93]; p=0.0104; median OS 55.9 [95% CI 37.3 – not estimable] vs 33.4 [25.5–39.9] mo; 24-mo OS rate 68.0% vs 58.5%; 36-mo OS rate 56.5% vs 47.6%). PFS was also significantly improved with D vs PBO (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.61–0.95]; p=0.0161; median PFS 16.6 [95% CI 10.2–28.2] vs 9.2 [7.4–12.9] mo; 18-mo PFS rate 48.8% vs 36.1%; 24-mo PFS rate 46.2% vs 34.2%). Tx benefit was generally consistent across predefined pt subgroups for both OS and PFS. With D vs PBO, maximum grade 3/4 all-cause adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24.3% vs 24.2% of pts; AEs led to tx discontinuation in 16.3% vs 10.6% of pts and to death in 2.7% vs 1.9%. Any-grade pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis was reported in 38.0% vs 30.2% of pts with D vs PBO (maximum grade 3/4 in 3.0% vs 2.6%). The D+T arm remains blinded until the next planned analysis. Conclusions: D as consolidation tx after cCRT demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS and PFS compared with PBO in pts with LS-SCLC. D was well tolerated and AEs were consistent with the known safety profile, with no new signals observed. These data support consolidation D as a new SoC for pts with LS-SCLC who have not progressed after cCRT. Clinical trial information: NCT03703297 .

Adding 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy to postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of short-course versus no androgen deprivation therapy in the RADICALS-HD randomised controlled trial

Previous evidence indicates that adjuvant, short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves metastasis-free survival when given with primary radiotherapy for intermediate-risk and high-risk localised prostate cancer. However, the value of ADT with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy is unclear. RADICALS-HD was an international randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of ADT used in combination with postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Key eligibility criteria were indication for radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen less than 5 ng/mL, absence of metastatic disease, and written consent. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to radiotherapy alone (no ADT) or radiotherapy with 6 months of ADT (short-course ADT), using monthly subcutaneous gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue injections, daily oral bicalutamide monotherapy 150 mg, or monthly subcutaneous degarelix. Randomisation was done centrally through minimisation with a random element, stratified by Gleason score, positive margins, radiotherapy timing, planned radiotherapy schedule, and planned type of ADT, in a computerised system. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was metastasis-free survival, defined as distant metastasis arising from prostate cancer or death from any cause. Standard survival analysis methods were used, accounting for randomisation stratification factors. The trial had 80% power with two-sided α of 5% to detect an absolute increase in 10-year metastasis-free survival from 80% to 86% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·67). Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN40814031, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047. Between Nov 22, 2007, and June 29, 2015, 1480 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 61-69]) were randomly assigned to receive no ADT (n=737) or short-course ADT (n=743) in addition to postoperative radiotherapy at 121 centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. With a median follow-up of 9·0 years (IQR 7·1-10·1), metastasis-free survival events were reported for 268 participants (142 in the no ADT group and 126 in the short-course ADT group; HR 0·886 [95% CI 0·688-1·140], p=0·35). 10-year metastasis-free survival was 79·2% (95% CI 75·4-82·5) in the no ADT group and 80·4% (76·6-83·6) in the short-course ADT group. Toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported for 121 (17%) of 737 participants in the no ADT group and 100 (14%) of 743 in the short-course ADT group (p=0·15), with no treatment-related deaths. Metastatic disease is uncommon following postoperative bed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Adding 6 months of ADT to this radiotherapy did not improve metastasis-free survival compared with no ADT. These findings do not support the use of short-course ADT with postoperative radiotherapy in this patient population. Cancer Research UK, UK Research and Innovation (formerly Medical Research Council), and Canadian Cancer Society.

Duration of androgen deprivation therapy with postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of long-course versus short-course androgen deprivation therapy in the RADICALS-HD randomised trial

Previous evidence supports androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with primary radiotherapy as initial treatment for intermediate-risk and high-risk localised prostate cancer. However, the use and optimal duration of ADT with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy remains uncertain. RADICALS-HD was a randomised controlled trial of ADT duration within the RADICALS protocol. Here, we report on the comparison of short-course versus long-course ADT. Key eligibility criteria were indication for radiotherapy after previous radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen less than 5 ng/mL, absence of metastatic disease, and written consent. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to add 6 months of ADT (short-course ADT) or 24 months of ADT (long-course ADT) to radiotherapy, using subcutaneous gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (monthly in the short-course ADT group and 3-monthly in the long-course ADT group), daily oral bicalutamide monotherapy 150 mg, or monthly subcutaneous degarelix. Randomisation was done centrally through minimisation with a random element, stratified by Gleason score, positive margins, radiotherapy timing, planned radiotherapy schedule, and planned type of ADT, in a computerised system. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was metastasis-free survival, defined as metastasis arising from prostate cancer or death from any cause. The comparison had more than 80% power with two-sided α of 5% to detect an absolute increase in 10-year metastasis-free survival from 75% to 81% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72). Standard time-to-event analyses were used. Analyses followed intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN40814031, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047. Between Jan 30, 2008, and July 7, 2015, 1523 patients (median age 65 years, IQR 60-69) were randomly assigned to receive short-course ADT (n=761) or long-course ADT (n=762) in addition to postoperative radiotherapy at 138 centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. With a median follow-up of 8·9 years (7·0-10·0), 313 metastasis-free survival events were reported overall (174 in the short-course ADT group and 139 in the long-course ADT group; HR 0·773 [95% CI 0·612-0·975]; p=0·029). 10-year metastasis-free survival was 71·9% (95% CI 67·6-75·7) in the short-course ADT group and 78·1% (74·2-81·5) in the long-course ADT group. Toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported for 105 (14%) of 753 participants in the short-course ADT group and 142 (19%) of 757 participants in the long-course ADT group (p=0·025), with no treatment-related deaths. Compared with adding 6 months of ADT, adding 24 months of ADT improved metastasis-free survival in people receiving postoperative radiotherapy. For individuals who can accept the additional duration of adverse effects, long-course ADT should be offered with postoperative radiotherapy. Cancer Research UK, UK Research and Innovation (formerly Medical Research Council), and Canadian Cancer Society.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Pleural Mesothelioma: Fine-Tuning the Optimal Doses

There is growing evidence of a role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of patients with oligoprogressive pleural mesothelioma (PM). The objective of this study was to investigate the optimal radiation therapy doses and schedules in this setting. The records of patients treated with SBRT (>5 Gy per fraction) for oligoprogression of PM at 2 institutions from June 2014 to September 2022 were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: “intermediate-dose” SBRT (i-SBRT; total dose, 30-36 Gy in 5-6 fractions) and “high-dose” SBRT (h-SBRT; total dose, 45-50 Gy in 4-8 fractions). The comparison between the 2 groups in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity was the primary endpoint of the study. Overall, 23 patients were treated for 25 pleural lesions. All had received upfront chemotherapy with platinum/pemetrexed. Fifteen patients were treated with i-SBRT and 8 patients with h-SBRT. The median equivalent dose was 40 Gy (range, 40-49.6) in the i-SBRT group and 74.46 Gy (range, 64-88) in the h-SBRT group. Six-month, 1-year, and 2-year LC were 100%, 100%, and 80% in the i-SBRT group and 100%, 100%, and 67% in the h-SBRT group, respectively (p =.94). Only 2 patients (1 for each dose group) had a recurrence in the radiation therapy field, both after experiencing a distant relapse. No severe acute and late toxicities were observed in the i-SBRT group, whereas in the h-SBRT group, 2 patients experienced G2 acute and late thoracic pain and 1 patient experienced G2 acute and G3 chronic thoracic pain. In our experience, SBRT is a safe and effective option for selected patients with oligoprogressive PM. Use of intermediate total doses keeping the dose per fraction high seems to offer an excellent LC, avoiding the risk of severe toxicity.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO HYPOFRACTIONATED EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY SCHEDULES IN SYMPTOM PALLIATION IN UNRESECTABLE CARCINOMA GALLBLADDER

Introduction: Gallbladder cancer is a highly aggressive cancer, with majority of the patients presenting in advanced stage having a dismal prognosis. Objective: The aim of the study, is to compare the symptom relief, loco-regional tumour response and tolerance between the two different external beam radiation therapy schedules. Methods: A randomized study was conducted for two years including 60 patients. The patients were divided into two arms, with Arm-A receiving a total dose of 33Gy/15# and theArm-B receiving 30Gy/10#. Results: Early tumour response was slightly better in Arm-B than in Arm-A, with 50% patients showing partial response in Arm-B in comparison to 40% in Arm-A. Symptom relief was better and statistically significant in Arm-B with respect to Arm-A. At 3 and 6 month follow up, the symptomatic relief was comparable between the two arms, with 72% patients having relief of nausea/ vomiting in Arm-B with respect to 39.1% patients in Arm-A. The weekly toxicities were almost comparable between the arms, with haematological toxicities being slightly higher in Arm-A as compared to Arm-B. Late treatment related toxicities were also higher in Arm-A as compared to Arm-B. Conclusion: Palliative radiation therapy given to patients, over a short period of time is better in comparison to similarequivalent dose given over longer period of time in symptom palliationfor patients with unresectable gallbladder cancer.