BACKGROUND: The course of benign prostatic hyperplasia is associated with immunological disorders at the systemic and local level. Despite the wide arsenal of pharmacological agents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, some patients undergo surgical treatment. Postoperative management programmes should be aimed at reducing the risks of complications, including infectious-inflammatory complications. In this regard, the inclusion of immunomodulatory pharmacotherapy and therapeutic physical factors in the course of reconstructive treatment is reasonable and justified. AIM: To study the role of the complex effect of pharmacotherapy and extracorporeal magnetic stimulation in the correction of immune disorders with the patients after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There have been observed 88 patients after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, who underwent a medical rehabilitation at stages II and III. At stage II 43 patients in the comparison group underwent standardized drug therapy, individual exercise therapy; in the main group 45 patients additionally were prescribed immunomodulatory therapy with Tameritis. At stage III the patients of the comparison group continued pharmacotherapy, exercise therapy, and transrectal magnetic therapy; in the main group 45 patients were additionally prescribed extracorporeal magnetic stimulation. A method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to study the content of interleukins (IL); IPSS-QOL (International Prostate Symptom Score – Quality-of-Life) and SF-36 (The Short Form-36) were used to assess the quality of life. Confidence level (р) 0.05. RESULTS: After the second inpatient stage of rehabilitation the patients of the main group after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia had a decrease the level of pro-inflammatory IL by 47.5% on average (p 0.01) with an increase in the level of anti-inflammatory IL-10 by 36.2% (p 0.01). After the III outpatient rehabilitation stage, a positive dynamics significantly increased and amounted to 63.2% (p 0.01) and 51.9% (p 0.01), reaching the normative values in the population. It should be noted that the achieved results have been preserved in a long time. In the comparison group the positive dynamics was significantly lower (p 0.05; p 0.01) in all the cases after the II and III stages of rehabilitation. The patients of the main group were observed a decrease in the severity of urinary disorders (p 0.01), restoration of quality of life (p 0.05) according to IPSS-QOL and SF-36 questionnaires at significant inter-group values (p 0.05) with the same confidence. CONCLUSION: The integrated use of pharmacotherapy and extracorporeal magnetic stimulation with the patients after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia provides significant correction of immune disorders, restoration of physical and mental health.