Ipsilateral Deep Vein Thrombosis Research Articles

Use of Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging for the Diagnostic Management of Suspected Thrombosis in Routine Clinical Practice.

Background The noninvasive magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) technique can be used to diagnose acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), without the use of intravenous contrast. MRDTI holds the potential to differentiate between acute and chronic DVT and could be helpful when diagnosing thrombosis is challenging. Objectives Our objective was to evaluate the application of MRDTI in clinical practice, including the frequency and indications of MRDTI scans performed in practice-based conditions, results, impact on treatment decisions, and associated patient outcomes. Methods A retrospective study was performed at the Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. MRDTI scans performed since its implementation in patients aged ≥18 years as part of clinical practice for the diagnostic management of suspected thrombosis were evaluated. Results Between October 2015 and September 2023, 36 patients had undergone MRDTI for the diagnostic evaluation of thrombosis. MRDTI application increased since 2019 (five-eight scans per year). The most common indication was to differentiate between acute and chronic thrombosis, mainly for suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT after inconclusive compression ultrasonography. In over a third of patients, acute thrombosis was confirmed by MRDTI. MRDTI results determined treatment decisions in all except two patients. One patient had symptomatic thrombosis of the lower extremity within 3 months after an MRDTI of the upper extremity without signs of acute thrombosis (1/23; 4.3%, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-21). Conclusion Over the past 4 years, MRDTI has been used increasingly in our hospital. MRDTI results guided treatment decisions, which confirms the clinical impact and feasibility of its application in daily practice.

Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF S2k Guideline.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are the most common manifestations of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Most DVTs affect the lower-extremity veins. Since the symptoms of DVT are non-specific, a prompt and standardised diagnostic work-up is essential to minimise the risk of PE in the acute phase and to prevent thrombosis progression, post-thrombotic syndrome and VTE recurrence in the long-term. Only recently, the AWMF S2k guidelines on Diagnostics and Therapy of Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism have been revised. In the present article, we summarize current evidence and guideline recommendations focusing on lower-extremity DVT (LEDVT). Depending on whether the diagnostic work-up is performed by a specialist in vascular medicine or by a primary care physician, different diagnostic algorithms are presented that combine clinical probability, D-dimer testing and diagnostic imaging. The diagnosis of ipsilateral recurrent DVT poses a particular challenge and is presented in a separate algorithm. Anticoagulant therapy is an essential part of therapy, with current guidelines clearly favouring regimens based on direct oral anticoagulants over the traditional sequential therapy of parenteral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists. For most DVTs, a duration of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation of at least 3 to 6 months is considered sufficient, and this raises the question of the risk of VTE recurrence after discontinuation of anticoagulation and the need for secondary prophylaxis in the long-term. Depending on the circumstances and trigger factors that have contributed to the occurrence of DVT, management strategies are presented that allow decision-making taking into account the individual bleeding risk and patient's preferences.

Associated Factors Of Post Thrombotic Syndrome In Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis

Background: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a chronic complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) which results in decreased quality of life and high health-care costs. Age, gender, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, ipsilateral DVT, history of surgery, use of anticoagulants, and history of malignancy are risk factors that associated with the occurrence of PTS. Method: This case-control study was conducted in 2019 at Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar. The presence or absence of risk factors of patients who met the inclusion criteria would then be obtained from medical records. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analyzes were performed using SPSS. Results: From 48 patients, 60.5% of the subjects were ≤60 years old and 56.3% were female. In the bivariate analysis it was found that not using anticoagulants (OR: 7.28; 95% CI = 2.03-26.10; p = 0.00), obesity (OR: 26.4; 95% CI = 5.54- 125.7; p = 0.00) and history of surgery (OR: 4.94; 95% CI = 0.92-26.41; p = 0.04) were risk factors associated with the incidence of PTS. Meanwhile, in the multivariate analysis, it was found that obesity status was the most dominant factor in which obese patients had a 31.91-fold higher risk of experiencing PTS (95% CI: 4,623-220.3; p = 0.00). Conclusion: Obesity, not using anticoagulants and history of surgery were factors that were independently associated with the occurrence of PTS in patients with DVT.

Cost-Effectiveness of Performing Reference Ultrasonography in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis.

The diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with compression ultrasonography (CUS) may be hindered by residual intravascular obstruction after previous DVT. A reference CUS, an additional ultrasound performed at anticoagulant discontinuation, may improve the diagnostic work-up of suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT by providing baseline images for future comparison. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routinely performing reference CUS in DVT patients. Patient-level data (n = 96) from a prospective management study (Theia study; NCT02262052) and claims data were used in a decision analytic model to compare 12 scenarios for diagnostic management of suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT. Estimated health care costs and mortality due to misdiagnosis, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and bleeding during the first year of follow-up after presentation with suspected recurrence were compared. All six scenarios including reference CUS had higher estimated 1-year costs (€1,763-€1,913) than the six without reference CUS (€1,192-€1,474). Costs were higher because reference CUS results often remained unused, as 20% of patients (according to claims data) would return with suspected recurrent DVT. Estimated mortality was comparable in scenarios with (14.8-17.9 per 10,000 patients) and without reference CUS (14.0-18.5 per 10,000). None of the four potentially most desirable scenarios included reference CUS. One-year health care costs of diagnostic strategies for suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT including reference CUS are higher compared to strategies without reference CUS, without mortality benefit. These results can inform policy-makers regarding use of health care resources during follow-up after DVT. From a cost-effectiveness perspective, the findings do not support the routine application of reference CUS.

Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban

IntroductionThe evaluation and management of patients who sustain recurrent thromboembolic events while taking therapeutic anticoagulation have not been well characterized; moreover, there has been no systematic review or randomized trial focused on treating patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. Therefore, we developed a pilot trial to compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism despite ongoing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban. Materials and methodsThe study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients with objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism to receive rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) plus aspirin (300 mg once a day) or an adjusted dose of acenocoumarol. The study was designed to evaluate the incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events (recurrent ipsilateral or contralateral DVT, PE, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic events. ResultsA total of 58 patients were randomized: 28 were allocated to the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and 30 to the acenocoumarol group. After 90 days of follow-up, three recurrent thromboembolic events (primary outcome) occurred in the acenocoumarol group – two DVTs and one ischemic stroke – and zero events in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.15; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008–2.83; P = 0.20). Minor bleeding occurred in five patients in the acenocoumarol group and zero in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (RR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.005–1.68; p = 0.10). There was one non-fatal gastrointestinal major bleed in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. ConclusionsIn this pilot study, there were no significant differences in any outcome assessed; however, recurrent thromboembolic events and minor bleeding events occurred numerically less frequently in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. These data suggest the need to carry out more extensive randomized studies with sufficient statistical power to clarify these results.

25 mm Hg versus 35 mm Hg elastic compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis (CELEST): a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

The optimal strength of compression needed to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after a proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is debated. We aimed to assess whether 25 mm Hg elastic compression stockings (ECS) are non-inferior to 35 mm Hg ECS in preventing PTS after a DVT. In this multicentre, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with a first ipsilateral proximal DVT attending 46 French vascular medicine hospital departments or private practices. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1, stratified by centre, age, and sex; with varying block sizes of two and four) to wear 25 mm Hg or 35 mm Hg ECS for 2 years. The primary outcome was the cumulative rate of PTS 2 years after inclusion, defined by a Villalta scale (≥5). Efficacy was assessed by intention-to-treat and in eligible participants who had complete primary outcome data. A per-protocol analysis was also conducted among compliant patients as a secondary outcome measure. Safety was assessed in all participants who used ECS at least once, and for which we have at least some tolerance information during follow-up. The margin for non-inferiority was 12·5%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01578122, and has been completed. Between June 28, 2012, and July 21, 2017, we enrolled 341 eligible participants who consented to randomisation. 233 (68%) were men and median age was 59 years (IQR 45-70). Collection of ethnicity and race as a routine research variable is not authorised in France. Median follow-up was 735 days (IQR 721-760). 249 (73%) had complete data at 2 years. For the primary analysis, 40 (31%) of 129 participants with complete data in the 25 mm Hg ECS group and 40 (33%) of 120 in the 35 mm Hg group had PTS (absolute difference -2·3% [90% CI -12·1 to 7·4], pnon-inferiority=0·0062; relative risk 0·93, 95% CI 0·65 to 1·33). Results remained similar after imputation of missing data in patients we were authorised to do so: the cumulative proportion of PTS was 45 (29%) of 154 in the 25 mm Hg ECS group versus 52 (35%) of 148 in the 35 mm Hg ECS group (relative risk 0·83, 95% CI 0·60 to 1·16). Absolute difference was -5·9%, (90% CI -14·7 to 2·9), p=0·0003 for non-inferiority. Adherence was optimal (>80% and modified GIRERD score of 0-2) for 75 (51%) of 146 patients assigned to 25 mm Hg ECS and for 56 (42%) of 134 patients assigned to 35 mm Hg ECS (p=0·11). Regarding major adverse events related to ECS, there were no between-group differences in rates of deep vein thrombosis (0 vs 1 [0·6%]), ipsilateral leg ulcer (0 vs 1 [0·6%]), infection (0 vs 0), or death (0 vs 0) between the 169 patients evaluated in the 25 mm Hg ECS group and the 159 patients in the 35 mm Hg ECS group. Two (1%) of 328 patients who ever wore ESC developed ECS-related serious adverse events, one distal DVT and one leg ulcer (both in the 35 mm Hg ECS group). In the 25 mm Hg group, 6 patients died, 14 had a venous thromboembolic recurrence (proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism), and 7 had a major bleed. In the 35 mm Hg group, 5 patients died, 10 had a venous thromboembolic recurrence (proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism), and 6 had a major bleed. Although we did not reach the prespecified sample size, our results suggest that 25 mm Hg ECS are non-inferior to 35 mm Hg ECS in preventing PTS. Larger more powerful studies are needed. Laboratoires Innothera, France.

The Incidence and Significance of Iliac Vein Stenosis in Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis

The role of iliac vein stenosis in the development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is poorly understood. This study determines the incidence of iliac vein stenosis in patients diagnosed with DVT and assesses its impact on presentation and outcomes. Our hypothesis is that the presence of iliac vein stenosis increases the risk of long-term ipsilateral DVT recurrence.

Risk of Ipsilateral Deep Vein Thrombosis After Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

Objective: To investigate the incidence and characteristics of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in kidney transplantation recipients and analyze whether the anatomical side of DVT was associated with the side of the transplanted organ.Methods: A single-center retrospective medical record review of patients who received a kidney transplant between January 2004 and July 2019 and who subsequently developed DVT. Only patients who received unilateral kidney transplants were included in the study. Patients who underwent concomitant pancreatic transplants, bilateral kidney transplants, or repeat procedures were excluded.Results: Of the 2449 kidney transplants performed during the study period, 1482 were included in the analysis (948 men [64%]; mean age 61 years). Of 606 duplex ultrasound tests, 115 results confirmed the presence of DVT. The incidence of symptomatic DVT was 4.7%. The most common time of DVT diagnosis was within four weeks after transplantation. Type 2 diabetes, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/abnormal pulmonary function, and being confined to bed were associated with DVT after kidney transplant (all P < 0.05). Patients with ultrasound-confirmed DVT had higher mean Caprini scores than patients with negative duplex ultrasounds (P < 0.5). Approximately 53% of transplant patients with ultrasound-confirmed DVT had a 1:1 correlation of transplant side to the side of DVT. Cohen kappa statistic 0.03 indicated no correlation between the side of DVT and the side of transplant.Conclusions: The incidence of DVT after kidney transplant was lower than the incidence reported in the literature. Being confined to a bed may be a risk factor for DVT after transplant surgery. Kidney transplant recipients who had a positive duplex ultrasound had higher Caprini risk assessment scores than transplant recipients who had negative duplex ultrasounds. There was no correlation between the side of the DVT and the side of the transplant.

Reduced calf muscle pump function is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study

The calf muscle pump is a major determinate of venous return in the legs but has not been studied as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). A population-based cohort study of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents was performed using calf pump function (CPF) measurements from venous plethysmography studies from 1998 to 2015. Patients with a history of VTE were excluded. Nursing validated VTE outcomes from the Rochester Epidemiology Project were identified after the index study date, and patients with reduced CPF (rCPF) were compared with patients with normal CPF. A total of 1532 patients with recorded CPF (28% air and 72% strain gauge plethysmography) were included; 591 (38.5%) had normal CPF, 353 (23.0%) had unilateral rCPF, and 588 (38.3%) had bilateral rCPF. Any VTE occurred in 87 patients (5.7%) after a median follow-up of 11.7 years (range, 0-22.0 years). Comparing patients with bilateral reduced to bilateral normal CPF, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for incident VTE was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.4) and after adjusting for age, BMI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, the HR was 1.68 (95% CI, 0.98-2.89). The adjusted HR for ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis was evaluated in 3064 legs comparing legs with reduced to normal CPF and was 1.71 (95% CI, 1.03-2.84). Mortality was significantly higher in both the bilateral (P < .001) and unilateral (P < .001) rCPF groups compared with normal CPF. Our results demonstrate that CPF is a risk factor for VTE in an otherwise low-risk ambulatory population and might be a useful component in risk stratification models.

Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis

The diagnostic workup of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) using compression ultrasonography (CUS) can be complicated by persistent intravascular abnormalities after a previous DVT. We showed that magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) can exclude recurrent ipsilateral DVT. However, it is unknown whether the application of MRDTI in daily clinical practice is cost effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of MRDTI-based diagnosis for suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT during first year of treatment and follow-up in the Dutch health care setting. Patient-level data of the Theia study (NCT02262052) were analyzed in 10 diagnostic scenarios, including a clinical decision rule and D-dimer test and imaging with CUS and/or MRDTI. The total costs of diagnostic tests and treatment during 1-year follow-up, including costs of false-positive and false-negative diagnoses, were compared and related to the associated mortality. The 1-year health care costs with MRDTI (range, €1219-1296) were generally lower than strategies without MRDTI (range, €1278-1529). This was because of superior specificity, despite higher initial diagnostic costs. Diagnostic strategies including CUS alone and CUS followed by MRDTI in case of an inconclusive CUS were potential optimal cost-effective strategies, with estimated average costs of €1529 and €1263 per patient and predicted mortality of 1 per 737 patients and 1 per 609 patients, respectively. Our model shows that diagnostic strategies with MRDTI for suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT have generally lower 1-year health care costs than strategies without MRDTI. Therefore, compared with CUS alone, applying MRDTI did not increase health care costs.

Can we predict and prevent the postthrombotic syndrome?

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) remains one of the major late complications of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a reported prevalence from 10 to 50%. Many factors were found to be related with the development and severity of PTS such as ipsilateral recurrent DVT, advanced age, obesity, ilio-femoral DVT and primary chronic venous disease presence. Some PTS prediction models have been proposed based on risk factor weight. However, it is still difficult to predict which patient with DVT will develop PTS and thus, the clinical application of these models remains limited. Among the identified problems the heterogeneity of the DVT patient population together with the variety of PTS clinical presentations and difficulties concerning PTS severity assessment should be mentioned. Difficulties on the implementation of the specific and objective PTS identification method have also the significant influence on the research focusing on PTS prevention modalities including risk factor modification, compression treatment, anticoagulation and invasive DVT treatment. In this review, the current approach and knowledge on PTS prediction and prevention are presented, including the conservative and invasive DVT treatment possibilities.

Yield of ultrasonography in patients with or without post‐thrombotic syndrome for diagnosis of suspected recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis

BackgroundThe yield of ultrasonography in patients with or without post‐thrombotic syndrome (PTS) presenting with a suspected recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is unknown. MethodsPatients with a first unprovoked DVT received standard anticoagulation for 5 to 7 months. Then, they were assessed for PTS using the Villalta scale (score equal or >5) and followed for up to 18 months. Yield of ultrasonography for recurrent ipsilateral DVT was defined as the number of confirmed DVT divided by the number of suspicions. Outcomes were compared between patients without or with PTS. Results and discussionA total of 452 patients with a symptomatic proximal DVT were included. During follow‐up, there were 144 suspicions of recurrent ipsilateral DVT, which were confirmed in 38 patients (26.4%). The confirmation rate of recurrent ipsilateral DVT was 25.6% (23/90) in patients without PTS as compared with 27.8% (15/54) in patients with PTS (P = .84). Our study supports a similar yield of ultrasonography to diagnose recurrent ipsilateral DVT in patients off anticoagulation therapy with or without PTS as defined by 5 or more points on the Villalta scale.

Safety of using the combination of the Wells rule and D‐dimer test for excluding acute recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis

BackgroundThe diagnostic accuracy of clinical probability assessment and D‐dimer testing for clinically suspected recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is largely unknown. AimTo evaluate the safety of ruling out acute recurrent DVT based on an unlikely Wells score for DVT and a normal D‐dimer test. MethodsThis was a predefined endpoint of the Theia study in which the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in acute recurrent ipsilateral DVT was validated. The Wells rule and D‐dimer test, performed as part of the study protocol, were not used for management decisions. The primary outcome of this analysis was the incidence of recurrent DVT at baseline or during 3‐month follow‐up for patients with an unlikely Wells score and a normal D‐dimer test. ResultsResults of both Wells score and D‐dimer tests were available in 231 patients without anticoagulant treatment. The recurrent DVT prevalence was 45% (103/231). Forty‐nine patients had an unlikely Wells score and normal D‐dimer test, of whom 3 (6.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3%‐18%) had recurrent DVT at baseline/follow‐up, yielding a sensitivity of 97% (95% CI 92%‐99%) and specificity of 36% (95% CI 28%‐45%). Thus, if clinical probability scoring and D‐dimer testing would have been applied, radiological imaging could have been omitted in 21% of patients with a diagnostic failure rate of 6.1%. ConclusionBy applying clinical probability scoring and D‐dimer testing, radiological imaging could be spared in one fifth of patients with suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT. However, the high failure rate does not support implementation of this strategy in daily practice.

Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis

AbstractThe diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is challenging, because persistent intravascular abnormalities after previous DVT often hinder a diagnosis by compression ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI), a technique without intravenous contrast and with a 10-minute acquisition time, has been shown to accurately distinguish acute recurrent DVT from chronic thrombotic remains. We have evaluated the safety of MRDTI as the sole test for excluding recurrent ipsilateral DVT. The Theia Study was a prospective, international, multicenter, diagnostic management study involving patients with clinically suspected acute recurrent ipsilateral DVT. Treatment of the patients was managed according to the result of the MRDTI, performed within 24 hours of study inclusion. The primary outcome was the 3-month incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after a MRDTI negative for DVT. The secondary outcome was the interobserver agreement on the MRDTI readings. An independent committee adjudicated all end points. Three hundred five patients were included. The baseline prevalence of recurrent DVT was 38%; superficial thrombophlebitis was diagnosed in 4.6%. The primary outcome occurred in 2 of 119 (1.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-5.9) patients with MRDTI negative for DVT and thrombophlebitis, who were not treated with any anticoagulant during follow-up; neither of these recurrences was fatal. The incidence of recurrent VTE in all patients with MRDTI negative for DVT was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.13%-3.8%). The agreement between initial local and post hoc central reading of the MRDTI images was excellent (κ statistic, 0.91). The incidence of VTE recurrence after negative MRDTI was low, and MRDTI proved to be a feasible and reproducible diagnostic test. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02262052.

Factors Affecting Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis after Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis and Left Iliac Vein Stent Placement in Patients with Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome

PurposeThis study evaluated the factors affecting contralateral and ipsilateral recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after iliac vein stent placement in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS). Materials and MethodsData from 130 patients (95 female patients) who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis and stent placement for IVCS with left lower leg thrombosis at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Mean patient age was 69.0 ± 14.0 years old. Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 3–164 months). Anticoagulation therapy was prescribed for 6 months, followed by lifelong antiplatelet therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors affecting the development of contralateral and ipsilateral recurrent DVT. ResultsSeven patients (5.4%) developed contralateral DVT (median, 26 months; range, 2–61 months), and 11 patients (8.5%) developed ipsilateral DVT (median, 1 month; range, 0–53 months). Stent location (odds ratio [OR], 11.564; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.159–115.417) and in-stent thrombosis during follow-up (OR, 15.142; 95% CI, 1.406–163.119) were predictors of recurrent contralateral DVT. Thrombophilia (OR, 47.560; 95% CI, 2.369–954.711), remaining inferior vena cava filter (OR, 30.552; 95% CI, 3.495–267.122), and in-stent thrombosis during follow-up (OR, 82.057; 95% CI, 2.915–2309.848) were predictors of ipsilateral DVT. ConclusionsContralateral DVT occurs late and is associated with extension of the iliac vein stent to the inferior vena cava and in-stent thrombosis. Ipsilateral DVT occurs relatively early and is associated with thrombophilia, remaining inferior vena cava filter, and in-stent thrombosis.

Risk of Ipsilateral Deep Vein Thrombosis After Use of AngioSeal Closure Device in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a known complication in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). This study investigated the association between use of the AngioSeal (St. Jude Medical, Minnetonka, MN) vascular closure device and the risk of ipsilateral and any DVT event after angiography in patients with aSAH. We conducted a review of our institutional cerebral angiography database for the years 2005-2018 to identify all adult patients who underwent angiography for aSAH. We compared the incidence of DVT (occurring within 14 days) between aSAH patients who underwent manual compression versus the AngioSeal closure device. A total of 459 aSAH patients underwent angiography; 262 underwent manual compression (57.1%) and 197 received AngioSeal (42.9%). There was a 3.4% rate of ipsilateral DVT in the manual compression group and 7.6% in the AngioSeal closure device group (χ2 test, P= 0.04). Similarly, the rate of any DVT was 8.8% for manual compression and 16.8% for patients who received AngioSeal (χ2 test, P= 0.01). On multivariate analysis, AngioSeal remained a significant independent predictor of ipsilateral DVT (odds ratio 2.4, P= 0.04) and any DVT (odds ratio 2.3, P= 0.01). In aSAH patients undergoing cerebral angiographic procedures with access through the femoral artery, the use of AngioSeal closure device was found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of ipsilateral DVT within 14 days.

OC2. Abstract Title: Comparison of Two Clinical Scales to Assess the Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Trial of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep Vein Thrombosis

<h3>Background</h3> Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) occurs in 20-50% of patients following proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), despite anticoagulation treatment. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends using the Villalta scale to standardize the diagnosis of PTS and to quantify its severity. However, many investigators use the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) to assess PTS. Different to the Villalta score, the VCSS was developed as a measure for chronic venous disease and not PTS specifically. The aim of the study was to determine which of Villalta and VCSS best captures clinically important PTS and PTS severity by analyzing the relationship of each to QoL scores in the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial study population. <h3>Methods</h3> A secondary analysis of the ATTRACT randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. 621 ATTRACT patients with symptomatic proximal DVT are included in this analysis. Correlations of the Villalta and VCSS scores with QoL scores (Short-Form Health Survey-36 physical component score/mental component score [SF-36 PCS/MCS]; the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-QoL/Symptoms [VEINES-QoL/Sym] questionnaire) were examined at study visits. The correlation of the random intercept (mean scores) and random slope (rate of change of the scores) between the Villalta, VCSS and the VEINES-QoL/Sym scores was assessed using a multivariate longitudinal model. <h3>Results</h3> The mean age at enrolment was 51 years of age, 78% were white, 62% were male, the mean BMI was 32 kg/m2, 57% had iliofemoral DVT, 19% had a previous ipsilateral DVT and 93% were taking one or more anticoagulation therapies prior to randomization. The median (range) correlation coefficients across all follow-up visits for the Villalta scale and VEINES-QOL and the Villalta scale and VEINES-Sym were -0.73 (0.51, -0.73) and -0.75 (-0.50, -0.76), respectively. The median (range) correlation coefficients for the Villalta scale and the SF-36 PCS or the SF-36 MCS across all follow-up visits were -0.51 (-0.35, -0.54) and -0.31 (-0.21, -0.38), respectively. In all correlation analyses between the Villalta scale and QoL measures, correlations at baseline were the weakest, and then increased until 6 months, after which the correlation coefficients remained relatively constant. The median correlation coefficient (range) across all follow-up visits for VCSS and VEINES-QOL and for VCSS and VEINES-Sym were -0.39 (-0.37, -0.39) and -0.41 (-0.36, -0.41), respectively. The median correlation (range) between VCSS and SF-36 PCS and for VCSS and MCS were -0.32 (-0.31, -0.32) and -0.12 (-0.12, -0.14), respectively. The magnitude of the correlations remained relatively constant from 6 months to 24 months follow-up visits. The Villalta scale had a strong negative correlation with VEINES-QoL and VEINES-Sym, a moderate negative correlation with SF-36 PCS, and a weak negative correlation with SF-36 MCS. Conversely, the VCSS had a weak negative correlation with VEINES-QoL, VEINES-Sym and SF-36 PCS, and a very weak negative correlation with SF-36 MCS. Adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, race, extent of DVT and previous ipsilateral DVT did not change our findings. Each pair of disease severity scales and QoL scales were analyzed as a multivariate outcome in a multivariate longitudinal model. A random intercept (mean scores) and random slope (rate of change of the scores) were present in all these multivariate longitudinal models. The impact of covariates (i.e. age, sex and BMI) was also examined. The Villalta score and VCSS score have a positive correlation between their random intercept and random slope. This suggests that patients with a higher average Villalta score also tend to have a higher average VCSS score (correlation is 0.74 and 0.69 if adjusted). Those that have a higher rate of change in Villalta score over time tend to have a higher rate of change in VCSS (correlation is 0.72 and 0.84 if adjusted). The impact from covariate adjustment by age, sex and BMI was minor. <h3>Conclusion</h3> For all measures, the Villalta scale has a substantially higher correlation with QOL than the VCSS. Our findings support the use of the Villalta scale to assess PTS in preference to VCSS, as it better captures the impact of PTS on patient reported QoL, a key consideration in patients with chronic PTS.

Evaluation of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy after iliocaval stenting: Factors associated with stent occlusion

ObjectiveIliocaval stenting has gained increased use over recent years for a variety of indications, including May-Thurner syndrome (MTS), post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MethodsA retrospective review of 155 patients undergoing iliocaval venous stenting at a large teaching hospital was performed. Clinical and procedural data, mode and duration of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, and outcomes were recorded. ResultsForty-five patients were treated for MTS, 49 for PTS. and 61 for acute DVT. The median follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range, 9-30 months). Primary patency rates were 97.8% in the MTS group, 85.7% in PTS, and 85.2% for the acute DVT group. Stent restenosis or occlusion occurred in one patient with MTS (2.2%), seven patients with PTS (14%), and nine patients with acute DVT (15%). An ipsilateral DVT recurred in 7 patients with PTS (14%) and 15 patients with acute DVT (25%). The stents that occluded had a tendency toward longer length (162.2 vs 125.2 mm; P = NS) and extension into the common femoral vein (18.8 vs 5.3%; P = NS). The patent stent group had statistically larger nominal diameter stents (P = .013). The duration of anticoagulation did not seem to be a significant factor in stent patency. ConclusionsStent diameter has a significant influence on iliocaval stent patency rates.

Post-thrombotic syndrome prevention – do we really know the predictive factors?

AbstractDespite an increasing knowledge and experience regarding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treatment, the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) remains still relatively high. According to the current knowledge it is still difficult to predict on the individual basis, who of the DVT patients will develop PTS as late complication of the vein thrombosis. Among the factors influencing the higher prevalence of PTS, the ipsilateral DVT recurrence is of the highest importance. The other factors which should be mentioned are age, obesity, previous chronic venous disease as well as a proximal DVT location or lack of symptoms’ resolution in the early treatment. Looking for the most effective PTS prevention method several clinical trials were performed regarding pharmacological DVT treatment, use of early mobilization and medical compression stocking as well as an implementation of the thrombectomy and thrombolysis. This paper presents a review of the current knowledge regarding the PTS predictive factors and prevention.

Abstract No. 592 Two steps forward, one step back: development of contralateral DVT following left common iliac vein stenting

Treatment of iliac vein narrowing/thrombosis necessitates stent deployment which typically extends into the inferior vena cava (IVC). The purpose of this study is to determine whether stent placement into the left iliac vein leads to future contralateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A retrospective analysis of 93 consecutive patients that underwent left common iliac vein stent placement between July 2008 and August 2017 was performed. In addition to demographic data the following was collected: proximal and distal stent landing zones, quantification of stent extension into the IVC, etiology of vein stenosis/thrombosis, presence of an IVC filter, incidence of ipsilateral and contralateral DVT, anticoagulation status, risk factors for DVT after stent placement, and reintervention rates. Pre procedural and post-procedure clinic visits were performed on all patients that had a stent deployed. A multiple logistic regression model was used for analysis. 93 patients (67 female, 26 male) underwent stent placement for left common iliac vein stenosis/thrombosis with an average follow-up of 826 days. Contralateral DVT developed in 9/93 (9.68%) with 8/9 developing after 30 days and 1/9 less than 30 days. Clinical symptoms necessitated reintervention on the ipsilateral side in 30/93 (32.29%) patients with 19/30 after 30 days and 11/30 within 30 days. Stent extension into the inferior vena cava was 24.3 ± 13.6 mm. Stent extension into the IVC in patients that developed contralateral DVT was 26.7 ± 18.0 mm. Mean stent diameter placed into the left common iliac vein was 14 mm for all patients. The upper landing zone/ extent of stent extension into the IVC did not carry an association with contralateral DVT formation (p=0.17) or rate of ipsilateral reintervention (p=0.07). Presence of an IVC filter (p=0.22) and stent diameter (p=0.13) did not correlate with contralateral DVT development. Contralateral DVT formation was a frequent finding in this study population but did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are warranted to elucidate potential etiologies for contralateral DVT formation in this patient population.