BackgroundData on ER and IV POS among organ transplant recipients (OTRs) are limited, and the role of TDM is unclear.MethodsRetrospective study of patients (pt) receiving any formulation of POS who had serum troughs checked. Therapeutic was defined as 3 1 mcg/mL.ResultsWe analyzed 88 pt and 340 levels (SUS: 88, ER: 197, IV: 55). Eighty-five pt were OTRs (97%), 73 were lung transplant recipients (LT) (83%), 17 had cystic fibrosis (CF) (19%). POS was used for treatment (70%) (probable aspergillosis (38%), possible aspergillosis (10%), mucormycosis (16%), other mycoses (6%)), prophylaxis (19%), and pre-emptive therapy (14%). POS was given for intolerance of or contraindication to other azoles (47%), salvage therapy (10%), resistance (19%), and failure to achieve therapeutic levels with other azoles (6%). Serum concentration/dose ratios were lower with SUS vs. ER/IV (P < 0.0001) but were similar in ER/IV groups (P = 0.51) (Figure). There was no difference in serum levels between pt receiving ER vs. IV POS at 300 mg once daily (median 1.2 vs. 1.3 mcg/mL, therapeutic 70% vs. 73%, P = 0.57 and >0.99, respectively). 3 pt had levels £ 0.2 mcg/mL on 300 mg ER: 2 had CF and had undergone LT (0.2 and 0 mcg/mL) and 1 had short-gut syndrome (0.1 mcg/mL). Sixty-six percent and 67 % of pt receiving ER or IV POS (300 mg once daily) achieved initial therapeutic levels, respectively; of these, 87% and 83% had median therapeutic follow-up levels, respectively. Serial levels were available for 7 pt whose dose was increased from 300 to 400 mg ER once daily for subtherapeutic levels. 4/7 pt achieved therapeutic levels on 400 vs. 0/7 on 300 mg ER once daily (P = 0.069). Metoclopramide use and CF were associated with subtherapeutic vs. therapeutic levels (25% vs. 4% and 37% vs. 13%, respectively, P = < 0.05). When pt with CF were excluded, neither age nor body mass index were associated with POS levels. CF pt had lower levels than non-CF pt on a dose of 300 mg ER once daily (median 0.8 vs. 1.3 mcg/mL, P = 0.018).ConclusionTherapeutic levels are more reliably achieved with ER & IV POS compared with SUS POS. Serial TDM is unnecessary for most, but is recommended for pt with CF or those on metoclopramide. Dose increases may effectively increase levels. Novel dosing strategies are needed for CF.Disclosures R. K. Shields, Astellas: Received research funding, Research support. Merck: Received research funding, Research support. C. J. Clancy, Merck: Received research funding, Research support. Astellas: Received research funding, Research support. Cidara: Received research funding, Research support. Astellas: Scientific Advisor, Advisory board. Merck: Scientific Advisor, Advisory board. Cidara: Scientific Advisor, Advisory board. Medicines Company: Scientific Advisor, Advisory board.
Read full abstract