Investigator-assessed Median Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

PurposeThere are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m²orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria.ResultsThe mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217–4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0–55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.ConclusionIn this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.

A Phase II Study of Chidamide Plus R-GDP Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Ineligible for Autologous Transplantation: Efficacy and Safety Analysis

Background: A significant subset of Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients (30%-40%) face treatment failure, necessitating effective salvage chemotherapy. We conducted a phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of chidamide plus R-GDP (rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin) in relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL patients. Methods: This open-label, single-arm study included 27 patients with r/r DLBCL who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. Prior to the induction monotherapy phase, chidamide was administered orally at a dose of 30 mg twice a week for one week. The combination therapy phase consisted of oral chidamide at a dose of 20 mg twice a week for two weeks, with a one-week discontinuation period, along with intravenous administration of rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin on a 21-day cycle. Results: A total of 27 patients received at least one dose of Chidamide plus R-GDP and were evaluated for safety. The median follow-up period was 17.0 months (range: 3.5 to 55 months). Radiological response assessment was available for 24 patients, who constituted the efficacy population. Fourteen patients completed six cycles of chidamide plus R-GDP (per-protocol population), while 10 patients discontinued treatment at the data cutoff. The baseline characteristics of enrolled patients included a median age of 67 years, predominantly older than 65 years. Approximately half of the patients exhibited elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels. All patients had received prior therapy with R-CHOP or equivalent chemoimmunotherapy. The majority of cases were classified as stage III/IV and non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) type by immunohistochemistry. Refractory or relapsed DLBCL within 1 year since the last treatment was observed in 74.0% of patients. Efficacy Outcomes: The investigator-assessed best objective response rate (ORR) was 79.2% (95% CI: 75.1% to 83.3%), with a complete response (CR) rate of 45.8% (95% CI: 41.6% to 49.9%) and a partial response (PR) rate of 33.3% (95% CI: 29.3% to 37.4%). The median time to response was 1.2 months, and the median time to CR or CRu (unconfirmed complete response) was 3.9 months. The best disease control rate was 87.5%. Among the patients who completed six cycles of chidamide plus R-GDP, the best ORR was 100%, with 71.4% achieving CR and 28.6% PR. Kaplan-Meier plots reveal that the median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) for the efficacy population was 5.9 (95% CI, 3.1 to 12.4) months. The median overall survival was 48.3 (95% CI, 13.1 to not reach (NR)) months. Safety Outcomes: A total of 13 patients (48.1%) required treatment interruption, primarily due to adverse events (22.2%) and disease progression (18.5%). Among patients who completed six cycles of chidamide plus R-GDP, 57.1% required a chidamide dose reduction. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia, occurring in all patients. Thrombocytopenia was the most common grade ≥3 adverse event leading to treatment interruption or dose reduction, affecting 48.1% of patients. Non-hematologic events included hypocalcemia (59.3%), hyponatremia (55.6%), and hypokalemia (44.4%). Three patients experienced grade 3 pneumonitis, and one patient had grade 3 skin rash. Conclusion: Chidamide plus R-GDP salvage chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy (ORR: 79.2%; CR rate: 45.8%) in r/r DLBCL patients. Adverse events were manageable but necessitated monitoring. Larger trials are needed to validate these findings and establish chidamide plus R-GDP as a potential treatment option for this challenging population. Keywords: relapsed/refractory DLBCL, salvage chemotherapy, chidamide, R-GDP, efficacy, safety

Clinical Utility of Mobocertinib in the Treatment of NSCLC - Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes.

Mobocertinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that selectively targets epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFRex20ins) mutations. It is a structural analog of the third-generation TKI osimertinib, which targets EGFR T790M mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, mobocertinib gains selectivity for EGFRex20ins mutants over wild type (WT) by interacting with the C790 gatekeeper residue of EGFR. This is accomplished via a carboxylated isopropyl ester moiety at the C5-position of mobocertinib's central pyrimidine core. In Phase 1/2 dose-escalation and dose-expansion studies, mobocertinib was found to have an investigator-confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 56% (9/16; 95% CI: 30-80%) and 25% (3/12; 95% CI: 5-57%) in patients without and with baseline brain metastasis, respectively. Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (mPFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 5.6 - not reached) and 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.8-15.9) in patients without and with baseline brain metastasis, respectively. A third phase evaluated patients who had received pre-treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (PPP) and included an extension cohort (EXCLAIM cohort) which evaluated patients treated previously with 1 or 2 lines of therapy. An Independent Review Committee (IRC) found both cohorts to have similar outcomes in terms of ORR, median time to response, mPFS, and disease progression or death. The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) related to mobocertinib are similar to other EGFR inhibitors and are predominately gastrointestinal (eg diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) and cutaneous (eg rash). In September 2021, the FDA granted accelerated approval for mobocertinib in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFRex20ins mutation whose disease progressed while on platinum-based chemotherapy. The present review describes data that led to the approval of mobocertinib.

Survival with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BackgroundIn an analysis of the primary outcome of this phase 3 trial, patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, as second-line treatment had significantly longer event-free survival than those who received standard care. Data were needed on longer-term outcomes.MethodsIn this trial, we randomly assigned patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in a 1:1 ratio to receive either axi-cel or standard care (two to three cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients who had a response). The primary outcome was event-free survival, and key secondary outcomes were response and overall survival. Here, we report the results of the prespecified overall survival analysis at 5 years after the first patient underwent randomization.ResultsA total of 359 patients underwent randomization to receive axi-cel (180 patients) or standard care (179 patients). At a median follow-up of 47.2 months, death had been reported in 82 patients in the axi-cel group and in 95 patients in the standard-care group. The median overall survival was not reached in the axi-cel group and was 31.1 months in the standard-care group; the estimated 4-year overall survival was 54.6% and 46.0%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.98; P=0.03 by stratified two-sided log-rank test). This increased survival with axi-cel was observed in the intention-to-treat population, which included 74% of patients with primary refractory disease and other high-risk features. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 14.7 months in the axi-cel group and 3.7 months in the standard-care group, with estimated 4-year percentages of 41.8% and 24.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67). No new treatment-related deaths had occurred since the primary analysis of event-free survival.ConclusionsAt a median follow-up of 47.2 months, axi-cel as second-line treatment for patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma resulted in significantly longer overall survival than standard care. (Funded by Kite; ZUMA-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03391466.)

Second-line endocrine therapy (ET) with or without palbociclib (P) maintenance in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR[+])/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2[-]) advanced breast cancer (ABC): PALMIRA trial.

1001 Background: Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with ET has become a standard first-line treatment for pts with endocrine-sensitive, HR[+]/HER2[-] ABC. The optimal treatment after progression on a CDK4/6i remains unknown. This study aims to determine if P maintenance with an alternative ET improves the antitumor activity of second-line treatment in this patient population. Methods: A total of 198 pts with HR[+]/HER2[-] ABC who had disease progression to first-line P plus ET (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) were included. Pts were eligible if they had clinical benefit to the first-line treatment defined as response or stable disease ≥24 weeks, or who had progressed on a P-based regimen in the adjuvant setting with disease progression after at least 12 months of treatment but no more than 12 months following P treatment completion. Pts were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive P plus second-line ET (letrozole or fulvestrant, based on prior ET) or second-line ET alone. Stratification factors were prior ET and the presence of visceral involvement. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) determined by RECIST v.1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival, and safety. The 2-sided log-rank test (α = 0.05) had an 80% power to detect a hazard ratio ≤0.59 in favor of P maintenance. Results: Between April 2019 and October 2022, 136 and 62 pts were randomized to receive P+ET and ET, respectively. Pts characteristics were well balanced. Median age was 59 years (range: 33-85), 61.1% were ECOG 0, 61.1% had visceral disease, and 89.9% received aromatase inhibitor + P as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. At median follow-up of 8.7 months and 155 PFS events, median investigator-assessed PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.5–5.8) in the P+ET vs. 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7–4.2) in the ET arm (hazard ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.6–1.1, p=0.206). This result was consistent across all stratification subgroups. 6-month PFS rate was 40.9% and 28.6% for P+ET and ET, respectively. Among 138 pts with measurable disease, no significant differences were observed in ORR (6.4% vs. 2.3%) or CBR (33.0% vs. 29.5%) for P+ET and ET, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events were higher in pts treated with P+ET (45.2% vs. 8.3%) and no new safety signals were identified. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: For HR[+]/HER2[-] ABC pts, maintaining P with a second-line ET beyond progression on prior P-based therapy did not significantly improve PFS compared with second-line ET alone. Planned biomarker analysis may help identify which pts are more likely to benefit from this therapeutic approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03809988 .

A phase 2 study of HLX07 as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

4029 Background: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) being the predominant histological subtype. Most patients are diagnosed at the advanced stage, and the prognosis remains poor. About 40–84% of ESCC cases showed overexpression of EGFR which was related to shorter overall survival and disease-free survival, indicating that treatment targeting EGFR could be a new strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HLX07, a novel recombinant humanized anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable/metastatic ESCC. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter phase 2 study, patients aged 18–75 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced, unresectable/metastatic ESCC or esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma were enrolled. Patients with no prior systemic antitumor therapy were assigned to group A and given HLX07 1000 mg plus serplulimab 200 mg (anti-PD-1 mAb) and chemotherapy (5-FU 2400 mg/m2 + cisplatin 50 mg/m2), Q2W IV. Patients who had failed first-line immuno-chemotherapy combination or at least two lines of other systemic antitumor therapy were assigned to group B and given HLX07 monotherapy (1000 mg Q2W IV). The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent radiological review committee and investigators per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included other efficacy measures, safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarker explorations. Results: As of February 4, 2023, 49 patients were enrolled in group A (n=30) and group B (n=19), with a median age of 64.5 and 59.0 years, respectively. 26 (86.7%) patients in group A and all patients in group B were male. The median follow-up duration was 2.9 months, and the preliminary efficacy was presented. Among the 42 efficacy evaluable patients (29 in group A and 13 in group B), investigator-assessed ORRs were 55.2% (95% CI 35.7–73.6%) and 23.1% (95% CI 5.0–53.8%) in the respective groups. Investigator-assessed median PFSs were not reached in group A and 1.5 months (95% CI 1.2–not evaluable) in group B. 15 (50.0%) patients in group A and 5 (26.3%) in group B had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). AEs of special interest were observed in 16 (53.3%) and 11 (57.9%) patients, respectively, most commonly rash (43.3% vs 47.4%) and hypomagnesemia (33.3% vs 36.8%). No drug-related death was reported. Conclusions: The encouraging antitumor activity and manageable safety profile support further development of HLX07 as a new treatment option for patients with advanced ESCC, both in first-line and late-line settings. Clinical trial information: NCT05221658 .

Pertuzumab retreatment in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Overall survival results of a phase III randomized trial (JBCRG-M05: PRECIOUS).

1015 Background: We previously reported that pertuzumab (P) retreatment in combination with trastuzumab (T) + chemotherapy based on physician’s choice (C) (PTC) significantly improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) compared with T + C (TC) in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) previously treated with P-containing regimens in the phase III PRECIOUS study. Here we report updated OS at the median follow-up of 27.4 mo. Methods: Patients previously treated with P-containing regimens as 1st/2nd-line treatment for LA/MBC were randomly assigned 1:1 to two groups, PTC group and TC group, stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status, previous treatment duration of P, number of previous chemotherapy regimens, and presence or absence of visceral metastasis. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. The key secondary endpoints included OS, independent reviewer assessed PFS and safety. Superiority of PTC to TC will be tested using a log-rank test and a one-sided P-value of less than 0.05 will be considered an indicator of superiority. The distribution of OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, the hazard ratio and one-sided 95% CI of the therapeutic effect between the groups will be calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Of the 219pts enrolled, 217 (108 PTC, 109 TC) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. At the data cutoff (Dec 31, 2021), OS and PFS events were 138 (63.6%) and 190 (87.6%), respectively. Updated median OS was significantly longer in the PTC group (median OS 36.2 vs. 26.5 mo.; HR = 0.73 [one side 95%CI upper limit, 0.97]; log-rank test p = 0.0323). In a prespecified subgroup analysis for OS including ER, visceral metastases, number of previous chemotherapy regimen was broadly constant without disease-free interval. Updated median investigator-assessed PFS (5.5 vs. 4.2 mo.; HR = 0.81 [one side 95%CI upper limit, 1.03]; stratified log-rank test p = 0.019) were also significantly better in the PTC group. Median PFS by independent review did not show the difference between two groups (4.4 vs. 4.4 mo.; HR = 1.03 [one side 95%CI upper limit, 1.36]; log-rank test p = 0.561). The serious adverse event rate did not differ between the groups (19.0% vs. 23.1%). There were no new safety signals in the two groups. Conclusions: Retreatment of P in combination with TC demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to TC. HER2 dual blockade with PT can contribute to improve survival in patients previously treated with P-containing regimens as 1st/2nd-line treatment for LA/MBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02514681 .

Veliparib with frontline chemotherapy and as maintenance in Japanese women with ovarian cancer: a subanalysis of efficacy, safety, and antiemetic use in the phase 3 VELIA trial

BackgroundThe phase 3 VELIA trial evaluated veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel and as maintenance in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.MethodsPatients with previously untreated stage III–IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma were randomized 1:1:1 to control (placebo with carboplatin/paclitaxel and placebo maintenance), veliparib-combination-only (veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel and placebo maintenance), or veliparib-throughout (veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel and veliparib maintenance). Randomization stratification factors included geographic region (Japan versus North America or rest of the world). Primary end point was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a subgroup of Japanese patients.ResultsSeventy-eight Japanese patients were randomized to control (n = 23), veliparib-combination-only (n = 30), and veliparib-throughout (n = 25) arms. In the Japanese subgroup, median progression-free survival for veliparib-throughout versus control was 27.4 and 19.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–1.16; p = 0.1 [not significant]). In the veliparib-throughout arm, grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia rates were higher for Japanese (32%/88%/32%) versus non-Japanese (17%/56%/28%) patients. Grade 3/4 anemia rates were higher in non-Japanese (65%) versus Japanese (48%) patients. Early introduction of olanzapine during veliparib monotherapy maintenance phase may help prevent premature discontinuation of veliparib, via its potent antiemetic efficacy.ConclusionsMedian progression-free survival was numerically longer in Japanese patients in the veliparib-throughout versus control arm, consistent with results in the overall study population. Pharmacokinetics were comparable between Japanese and non-Japanese patients. Data for the subgroup of Japanese patients were not powered to show statistical significance but to guide further investigation.

Trifluridine–tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy (SOLSTICE): a randomised, open-label phase 3 study

Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab has shown efficacy in previous phase 2 studies including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to investigate first-line trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive treatment. In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 study, we enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer, ineligible for full-dose doublet or triplet chemotherapy and curative resection across 25 countries and regions. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab or capecitabine plus bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity using an interactive web response system, stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2), primary tumour location (right vs left colon), and the main reason for not being a candidate for intensive therapy (clinical condition vs non-clinical condition). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to radiological progression or death from any cause, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients having taken at least one dose of the study drug. The trial is ongoing, findings presented here are those of the primary analysis of progression-free survival, conducted after 629 events had occurred. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03869892. Between March 21, 2019, and Sept 14, 2020, 856 patients (54% male, 46% female) were randomly assigned to trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab (n=426) or capecitabine plus bevacizumab (n=430). After a median follow-up of 16·6 months (95% CI 16·5-17·1), the hazard ratio for progression-free survival for trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab was 0·87 (0·75-1·02; p=0·0464; protocol-defined significance level of p=0·021 not met). Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9·4 months (95% CI 9·1-10·9) with trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus 9·3 months (8·9-9·8) with capecitabine plus bevacizumab. The most common grade 3 and higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (220 [52%] of 423 patients in the trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab group vs six [1%] of 427 in the capecitabine plus bevacizumab group), decreased neutrophil count (78 [18%] vs four [<1%]), anaemia (60 [14%] vs 16 [4%]), and hand-foot syndrome (none vs 61 [15%]). Nine deaths (five in the trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and four in the capecitabine plus bevacizumab group) were treatment related. First-line trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab was not superior to capecitabine plus bevacizumab in this population. As expected, the safety profile differed between the two treatments, but there were no new safety concerns. Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab represents a feasible alternative to capecitabine plus bevacizumab in this population. Servier International Research Institute, Suresnes, France.

Efficacy and safety of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs. trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with pretreated HER2-positive advanced metastatic breast cancer: results from a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II bridging study.

Trastuzumab is the recommended first-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in China, but therapeutic resistance to trastuzumab and other early-line treatments is common and late-line treatment options are limited. Derived from the same murine precursor antibody, margetuximab has enhanced anti-tumor activity compared with trastuzumab and may be an effective late-line treatment. However, data regarding the use of margetuximab in pre-treated Chinese patients are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs. trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients, and to determine whether the results are consistent with the clinical benefit of margetuximab observed in the pivotal global phase III study. In this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II bridging study, eligible Chinese patients pretreated with ≥2 lines of anti-HER2 therapies were randomized 1:1 by stratified block randomization to margetuximab (15 mg/kg over at least 120 minutes) or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg over at least 30 minutes), each administered intravenously once every 21-day cycle and plus chemotherapy. Disease assessment was conducted once every two treatment cycles (6 weeks ± 7 days). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Between February 4, 2020 and February 23, 2021, 123 patients were randomized to the margetuximab (n=62) and trastuzumab (n=61) arms. Among them, 15 and 7 patients, respectively, were still on study treatment as of data cut-off (September 3, 2021). Overall, 99.2% were female, median age was 53 years old. All patients were pretreated with trastuzumab, and 83.7% and 25.2%, respectively, were pretreated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and pertuzumab. Baseline characteristics were numerically balanced between arms. BICR-assessed median PFS (mPFS) was 5.5 months in the margetuximab arm and 4.1 months in the trastuzumab arm, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-1.12], which met the consistency criterion (HR <0.88) for bridging success. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 5.5 months in the margetuximab arm and 4.0 months in the trastuzumab arm (HR =0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.96). Median OS (mOS) was not yet reached. Both ORR and CBR were greater in the margetuximab arm (25.5% vs. 12.5%; 32.7% vs. 14.3%). Safety results were numerically comparable between the two arms. Anti-HER2 treatment-related infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were more common in the margetuximab arm than in the trastuzumab arm (12.9% vs. 1.7%). All IRRs could be resolved. Margetuximab was effective and well-tolerated in this study, supporting its clinical use in pretreated HER2-positive MBC patients in China. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04262804.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK+ NSCLC: Final Results of the Phase 1/2 and Randomized Phase 2 (ALTA) Trials

IntroductionWe report brigatinib long-term efficacy and safety from phase 1/2 and phase 2 (ALTA) trials in ALK–rearrangement positive (ALK+) NSCLC. MethodsThe phase 1/2 study evaluated brigatinib 30 to 300 mg/d in patients with advanced malignancies. ALTA randomized patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC to brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in at 90 mg; arm B). ResultsIn the phase 1/2 study, 79 of 137 brigatinib-treated patients had ALK+ NSCLC; 71 were crizotinib pretreated. ALTA randomized 222 patients (n = 112 in arm A; n = 110 in arm B). Median follow-up at phase 1/2 study end (≈5.6 y after last patient enrolled) was 27.7 months; at ALTA study end (≈4.4 y after last patient enrolled), 19.6 months (A) and 28.3 months (B). Among patients with ALK+ NSCLC in the phase 1/2 study, median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8–21.2); median overall survival was 47.6 months (28.6–not reached). In ALTA, median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.2 months (7.4–11.1) in arm A and 15.6 months (11.1–18.5) in arm B; median independent review committee (IRC)-assessed PFS was 9.9 (7.4–12.8) and 16.7 (11.6–21.4) months, respectively; median overall survival was 25.9 (18.2–45.8) and 40.6 (32.5–not reached) months, respectively. Median intracranial PFS for patients with any brain metastases was 12.8 (9.2–18.4) months in arm A and 18.4 (12.6–23.9) months in arm B. No new safety signals were identified versus previous analyses. ConclusionsBrigatinib exhibited sustained long-term activity and PFS with manageable safety in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Befotertinib (D-0316) in Patients With EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC That Had Progressed After Prior EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study

IntroductionBefotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This study evaluated befotertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who developed an EGFR T790M mutation after progression on first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy. MethodsThis was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study at 49 hospitals across mainland China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M mutations with disease progression after prior first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy received oral befotertinib of 50 mg (cohort A) or 75 to 100 mg (cohort B) once daily. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee in intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03861156. ResultsA total of 176 patients and 290 patients were included in cohorts A (50 mg) and B (75–100 mg), respectively. At data cutoff (August 15, 2021), independent review committee–assessed ORR was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.9%–72.9%) in cohort B. The investigator-assessed ORR was 54.0% (95% CI: 46.3%–61.5%) in cohort A and 65.9% (95% CI: 60.1%–71.3%) in cohort B. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 11.0 (95% CI: 9.6–12.5) months in cohort A and 12.5 (95% CI: 11.1–13.8) months in cohort B. The median independent review committee–assessed progression-free survival in cohort B was 16.6 (95% CI: 15.0–not evaluable [NE]) months. The intracranial ORR was 26.7% (95% CI: 7.8%–55.1%) in cohort A by investigator assessment, while 57.1% (95% CI: 34.0%–78.2%) and 55.9% (95% CI: 37.9%–72.8%) in cohort B by investigator and independent review committee assessment, respectively. The median investigator-assessed intracranial progression-free survival was 16.5 (95% CI: 8.6–NE) months in cohort A, while the median intracranial progression-free survival was not evaluable in cohort B due to immature data regardless of investigator or independent review committee assessment. and NE (95% CI: 13.8–NE) in cohort B. The overall survival was immature. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 20.5% and 11.4% of patients in cohort A and in 29.3% and 10.0% of patients in cohort B, respectively. ConclusionsBefotertinib of 75 to 100 mg has satisfying efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring T790M mutation with resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. A phase 3 randomized trial is underway (NCT04206072).

Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel for PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: primary results from cohort B of the IPATunity130 randomized phase 3 trial

PurposePI3K/AKT pathway alterations are frequent in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers. IPATunity130 Cohort B investigated ipatasertib–paclitaxel in PI3K pathway-mutant HR+ unresectable locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (aBC).MethodsCohort B of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 IPATunity130 trial enrolled patients with HR+ HER2-negative PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered measurable aBC who were considered inappropriate for endocrine-based therapy (demonstrated insensitivity to endocrine therapy or visceral crisis) and were candidates for taxane monotherapy. Patients with prior chemotherapy for aBC or relapse < 1 year since (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were ineligible. Patients were randomized 2:1 to ipatasertib (400 mg, days 1–21) or placebo, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15), every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsOverall, 146 patients were randomized to ipatasertib–paclitaxel and 76 to placebo–paclitaxel. In both arms, median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.3 months (hazard ratio, 1.00, 95% CI 0.71–1.40) and the objective response rate was 47%. Median paclitaxel duration was 6.9 versus 8.8 months in the ipatasertib–paclitaxel versus placebo–paclitaxel arms, respectively; median ipatasertib/placebo duration was 8.0 versus 9.1 months, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were diarrhea (12% with ipatasertib–paclitaxel vs 1% with placebo–paclitaxel), neutrophil count decreased (9% vs 7%), neutropenia (8% vs 9%), peripheral neuropathy (7% vs 3%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (3% vs 5%) and hypertension (1% vs 5%).ConclusionAdding ipatasertib to paclitaxel did not improve efficacy in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered HR+ HER2-negative aBC. The ipatasertib–paclitaxel safety profile was consistent with each agent’s known adverse effects.Trial registration NCT03337724.

Veliparib monotherapy following carboplatin/paclitaxel plus veliparib combination therapy in patients with germline BRCA-associated advanced breast cancer: results of exploratory analyses from the phase III BROCADE3 trial

In the BROCADE3 trial, addition of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, veliparib, to carboplatin/paclitaxel improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.88; P= 0.002) in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, germline BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer. A subset of patients discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on veliparib/placebo maintenance monotherapy until progression. Analyses in this patient subgroup are reported. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel or placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel. Veliparib (120 mg twice daily) or placebo was given on days-2 to 5, carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/ml) on day 1, and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles. Patients who discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression received blinded study drug monotherapy at an increased dose of 300-400 mg twice daily continuously. PFS was the primary endpoint. Exploratory analyses were carried out in the subgroup of patients who received blinded study drug as monotherapy. A time-varying Cox model including data from all patients was also used to evaluate treatment effect in the combination and monotherapy phases. A total of 136 of 337 patients randomized to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and 58/172 patients randomized to placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on blinded veliparib or placebo monotherapy. In this blinded monotherapy subgroup, investigator-assessed median PFS from randomization was 25.7 months with veliparib versus 14.6 months with placebo. Hazard ratios from a time-varying Cox model favored veliparib during both combination therapy and monotherapy. Any-grade adverse events occurring in the monotherapy phase were primarily gastrointestinal. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia and anemia (4% each with veliparib; 5% and 2%, respectively, with placebo). Veliparib maintenance monotherapy had a tolerable safety profile and may extend PFS following combination chemotherapy.

Fulvestrant-Palbociclib vs Letrozole-Palbociclib as Initial Therapy for Endocrine-Sensitive, Hormone Receptor–Positive, ERBB2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole has become a standard first-line treatment for patients with endocrine-sensitive, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer. Meanwhile, the antiestrogen fulvestrant was shown to be superior to anastrozole in the absence of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibition for this patient population. To assess whether fulvestrant is superior to letrozole when combined with palbociclib in the first-line scenario. In this international, randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical study conducted from July 30, 2015, to January 8, 2018, patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer with no prior therapy in the metastatic setting and endocrine-sensitive criteria were recruited from 47 centers in 7 countries. Data were analyzed from February 11 to May 15, 2020. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive palbociclib with either fulvestrant or letrozole. Stratification factors were type of disease presentation (de novo vs recurrent) and the presence of visceral involvement (yes vs no). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. A total of 486 women (median age, 63 years [range, 25-90 years]; 3 Asian women [0.6%]; 4 Black women [0.8%]; 461 White women [94.9%]; 18 women of unknown race [3.7%]) were randomized (243 to fulvestrant-palbociclib and 243 to letrozole-palbociclib). Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.2-33.1 months) in the fulvestrant-palbociclib group vs 32.8 months (95% CI, 25.8-35.9 months) in the letrozole-palbociclib group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89-1.45; P = .32). This result was consistent across the stratification factors. No significant differences were observed in objective response rate (46.5% vs 50.2%) and 3-year overall survival rate (79.4% vs 77.1%) for fulvestrant-palbociclib and letrozole-palbociclib, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events were comparable among treatment groups, and no new safety signals were identified. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Although fulvestrant-palbociclib demonstrated significant antitumor activity, this randomized clinical trial failed to identify an improvement in progression-free survival with this regimen over letrozole-palbociclib in patients with endocrine-sensitive, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02491983.

Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma: the effects of progression-free interval and prior therapies on efficacy and safety in the randomized phase III trial ARIEL3

IntroductionIn ARIEL3 (NCT01968213), the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo regardless of biomarker status when used as maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer. The aim...

Clinical effectiveness of olaparib monotherapy in germline BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: phase IIIb LUCY interim analysis

BackgroundIn the phase III OlympiAD trial, olaparib significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy of physician's choice in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The phase IIIb LUCY trial assessed the clinical effectiveness of olaparib in similar patients, in a setting reflecting clinical practice. MethodsThis open-label, single-arm trial of olaparib (300 mg, twice daily) enrolled patients with BRCAm, HER2-negative mBC who had received taxane and/or anthracycline in the (neo)adjuvant/metastatic setting and not more than two lines of prior chemotherapy for mBC. Patients with hormone receptor–positive mBC had progressed on at least one line of endocrine therapy in an adjuvant/metastatic setting and were unsuitable for further endocrine treatment. This interim analysis was planned after 160 PFS events. ResultsOf 563 patients screened, 252 patients with gBRCAm were enrolled and received at least one dose of olaparib. The median investigator-assessed PFS was 8.11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.93–8.67; 166/252 events [65.9% maturity]). The investigator-assessed clinical response rate was 48.6%, and median time to first subsequent treatment or death was 9.66 months (95% CI, 8.67–11.14). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; >20% patients) were nausea, anaemia, asthenia, vomiting and fatigue. Eleven patients (4.4%) discontinued treatment because of a TEAE. Grade 3 or higher TEAEs occurred in 64 patients (25.4%), including anaemia (33 patients; 13.1%). ConclusionOlaparib was clinically effective in patients with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC with safety outcomes consistent with previous findings. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03286842.

Subcutaneous trastuzumab with pertuzumab and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Final analysis of MetaPHER, a phase IIIb single-arm safety study

PurposeIntravenous trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel are first-line standard of care for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). MetaPHER is the first study assessing the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous trastuzumab plus intravenous pertuzumab and chemotherapy in a global patient population with HER2-positive mBC.MethodsIn this open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 3b study, eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old with histologically/cytologically confirmed previously untreated HER2-positive mBC. All received ≥ 1 subcutaneous trastuzumab 600 mg fixed dose plus intravenous pertuzumab (loading dose: 840 mg/kg; maintenance: 420 mg/kg) and docetaxel (≥ 6 cycles; initial dose 75 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. The primary objective was safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included efficacy.ResultsAt clinical cutoff, 276 patients had completed the study; median duration of follow-up was 27 months. The most common any-grade adverse events were diarrhea, alopecia, and asthenia; the most common grade ≥ 3 events were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and hypertension. There were no cardiac deaths and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was stable over time. Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 18.7 months; objective response rate was 75.6%.ConclusionsSafety and efficacy with subcutaneous trastuzumab plus intravenous pertuzumab and docetaxel in mBC are consistent with historical evidence of intravenous trastuzumab with this combination. Findings further support subcutaneous administration not affecting safety/efficacy profiles of trastuzumab in HER2-positive BC with increased flexibility in patient care. A fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection has recently been approved for the treatment of HER2-positive early/mBC, further addressing the increasing relevance of and need for patient-centric treatment strategies.Trial registrationNCT02402712

Efficacy and Safety of Rociletinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: The Results of TIGER-3, a Phase 3 Randomized Study

IntroductionThe TIGER-3 (NCT02322281) study was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of rociletinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets EGFR T790M and common EGFR-activating mutations, versus chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC who progressed on first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. MethodsPatients with advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC with disease progression on standard therapy (previous EGFR TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy) were randomized to oral rociletinib (500 or 625 mg twice daily) or single-agent chemotherapy (pemetrexed, gemcitabine, docetaxel, or paclitaxel). ResultsEnrollment was halted when rociletinib development was discontinued in 2016. Of 149 enrolled patients, 75 were randomized to rociletinib (n = 53: 500 mg twice daily; n = 22: 625 mg twice daily) and 74 to chemotherapy. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6–5.4) in the rociletinib 500-mg group and 5.5 months (95% CI: 1.8–8.1) in the 625-mg group versus 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.4–2.9) in the chemotherapy group. An improved PFS was observed in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC treated with rociletinib (n = 25; 500 mg and 625 mg twice daily) versus chemotherapy (n = 20; 6.8 versus 2.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28–1.07, p = 0.074). Grade 3 or higher hyperglycemia (24.0%), corrected QT prolongation (6.7%), diarrhea (2.7%), and vomiting (1.3%) were more frequent with rociletinib than chemotherapy (0%, 0%, 1.4%, and 0%, respectively). ConclusionsRociletinib had a more favorable median PFS versus chemotherapy but had higher rates of hyperglycemia and corrected QT prolongation in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on previous EGFR TKI. Incomplete enrollment prevented evaluation of the primary efficacy end point.

Surufatinib in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-p): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

Surufatinib showed superior efficacy in extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the phase 3 SANET-ep study. In SANET-p, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. SANET-p was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, done in 21 hospitals across China. Eligible patients were adults (aged 18 years or older) with progressive, advanced, well differentiated pancreatic NETs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and progression on up to two kinds of previous systemic regimens for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive web response system to receive 300 mg of surufatinib or placebo, taken orally once per day in consecutive 4-week treatment cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, poor compliance, use of other antitumour medication, pregnancy, loss to follow-up, or if the investigator deemed discontinuation in the patient's best interest. Randomisation was done centrally using stratified block randomisation (block size three), stratified by pathological grade, previous systemic antitumour treatment, and ECOG performance status score. Patients, investigators, research staff, and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment allocation. Crossover to surufatinib was permitted for patients in the placebo group with disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients in randomisation. A pre-planned interim analysis was done at 70% of the predicted progression-free survival events. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02589821. Between Feb 18, 2016, and Nov 11, 2019, of 264 patients who were screened, 172 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive surufatinib (n=113) or placebo (n=59). The median follow-up was 19·3 months (95% CI 9·3-19·4) in the surufatinib group and 11·1 months (5·7-35·9) in the placebo group. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 10·9 months (7·5-13·8) for surufatinib versus 3·7 months (2·8-5·6) for placebo (hazard ratio 0·49, 95% CI 0·32-0·76; p=0·0011). The trial met the early stopping criteria at the interim analysis and was terminated on recommendation from the independent data monitoring committee. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (43 [38%] of 113 with surufatinib vs four [7%] of 59 with placebo), proteinuria (11 [10%] vs one [2%]), and hypertriglyceridaemia (eight [7%] vs none). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 25 (22%) patients in the surufatinib group and four (7%) patients in the placebo group. There were three on-treatment deaths in the surufatinib group, including two deaths due to adverse events (gastrointestinal haemorrhage [possibly treatment-related] and cerebral haemorrhage [unlikely to be treatment-related]), and one death attributed to disease progression. One on-treatment death in the placebo group was attributed to disease progression. Surufatinib significantly improves progression-free survival and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with progressive, advanced pancreatic NETs, and could be a potential treatment option in this patient population. Hutchison MediPharma.