Abstract Aims Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor (SI-NETs) is the most common malignancy of the small bowel. Curative treatment is exclusively operative and explorative laparotomy is still considered to be the standard procedure. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the outcome of minimally invasive surgery in patients with SI-NETs, at our endocrine surgery unit in 2019, compared to the open approach. Methods Patients who underwent surgery for SI-NETs between 2013 and 2023 were included. Descriptive variables such as operative time, length of hospital stay, use of analgesia and radiciality were compared primarily between groups of patients operated before and after 2019 and secondarily between open and hand-port assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). Results Of 97 patients with SI-NET included in the study, 58 (59.8 %) had an open and 39 (40.2 %) minimal invasive surgery. While difference in the operative time, 121 min (91.3-150.3) vs 108 min (83-141), the length of hospital stay, 6 days (4-7) vs 5 days (4-8) and surgical radicality in patients with stage II-III, 79.3% vs 85%, (p-value 0.313) was not significant, 86.2% of patients with explorative laparotomy required epidural analgesia compared to 23.1% with HALS (p-value = <0.001). Conclusion Hand-port assisted laparoscopic surgery of SI-NETs was assessed to be a feasible approach without compromising radical resection and enhancing postoperative recovery with lower amount of required analgesia postoperatively.
Read full abstract