Invasive Arterial Measurements Research Articles

Comparing the compensatory reserve metric obtained from invasive arterial measurements and photoplethysmographic volume-clamp during simulated hemorrhage.

The compensatory reserve metric (CRM) is a novel tool to predict cardiovascular decompensation during hemorrhage. The CRM is traditionally computed using waveforms obtained from photoplethysmographic volume-clamp (PPGVC), yet invasive arterial pressures may be uniquely available. We aimed to examine the level of agreement of CRM values computed from invasive arterial-derived waveforms and values computed from PPGVC-derived waveforms. Sixty-nine participants underwent graded lower body negative pressure to simulate hemorrhage. Waveform measurements from a brachial arterial catheter and PPGVC finger-cuff were collected. A PPGVC brachial waveform was reconstructed from the PPGVC finger waveform. Thereafter, CRM values were computed using a deep one-dimensional convolutional neural network for each of the following source waveforms; (1) invasive arterial, (2) PPGVC brachial, and (3) PPGVC finger. Bland-Altman analyses were used to determine the level of agreement between invasive arterial CRM values and PPGVC CRM values, with results presented as the Mean Bias [95% Limits of Agreement]. The mean bias between invasive arterial- and PPGVC brachial CRM values at rest, an applied pressure of -45mmHg, and at tolerance was 6% [-17%, 29%], 1% [-28%, 30%], and 0% [-25%, 25%], respectively. Additionally, the mean bias between invasive arterial- and PPGVC finger CRM values at rest, applied pressure of -45mmHg, and tolerance was 2% [-22%, 26%], 8% [-19%, 35%], and 5% [-15%, 25%], respectively. There is generally good agreement between CRM values obtained from invasive arterial waveforms and values obtained from PPGVC waveforms. Invasive arterial waveforms may serve as an alternative for computation of the CRM.

Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness using CNAP™ technology is interchangeable with invasive arterial measurements during major open abdominal surgery

BackgroundDynamic variables of fluid responsiveness (FR), such as pulse pressure variation (PPV), have been shown to predict the response to a fluid challenge accurately. A recently introduced non-invasive technology based on the volume-clamp method (CNAP™) offers the ability to measure PPV continuously (PPVCNAP). However, the accuracy regarding the prediction of FR in the operating room has to be proved. MethodsWe compared PPVCNAP with an invasive approach measuring PPV using the PiCCO technology (PPVPiCCO). We studied 47 patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery before and after a passive leg-raising manoeuvre and i.v. fluid resuscitation. A positive response to a volume challenge was defined as ≥15% increase in stroke volume index obtained with transpulmonary thermodilution. Bootstrap methodology was used with the grey zone approach to determine the area of inconsistency regarding the ability of PPVPiCCO and PPVCNAP to predict FR. ResultsIn response to the passive leg-raising manoeuvre, PPVPiCCO predicted FR with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 72% [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86] compared with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 72% (AUC 0.78) for PPVCNAP. Regarding the volume challenge in the operating room, PPVPiCCO predicted FR with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 100% (AUC 0.97) compared with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 93% (AUC 0.97) for PPVCNAP. The grey zone approach identified a range of PPVPiCCO values (11–13%) and PPVCNAP values (7–11%) for which FR could not be predicted reliably. ConclusionsNon-invasive assessment of FR using PPVCNAP seems to be interchangeable with PPVPiCCO in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery. Clinical trial registrationNCT02166580.

Neonatal/infant validation study of the CAS model 740 noninvasive blood pressure monitor with the Orion/MaxIQ NIBP module

Blood pressure monitoring is an essential vital sign when caring for critically ill children. Invasive monitoring is considered the gold standard, but is not always feasible. The following study compared the CAS model 740 noninvasive blood pressure monitor with the Orion/MaxIQ NIBP module with the reference (invasive arterial measurement). We evaluated the validity of the system using the criteria provided by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. We performed paired measurements of 29 critically ill neonates and children. For individual paired comparisons, the mean difference in the systolic blood pressure was 2.42 mmHg (SD ± 6.3). The mean difference in the diastolic blood pressure was -1.29 mmHg (SD ± 5.45). The percentage of readings within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg for systolic blood pressure was 65.6, 86.0, and 96.8%, respectively. The percentage of readings within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure was 77.7, 93, and 95.5%, respectively. The CAS model 740 noninvasive blood pressure monitor with the Orion/MaxIQ NIBP module fulfills the accuracy performance criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. This model may allow for rapid and accurate noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in neonates and children.