Intron-encoded Reverse Transcriptase Research Articles

Development of a group II intron-based genetic manipulation tool for Streptomyces.

The availability of an alternative and efficient genetic editing technology is critical for fundamental research and strain improvement engineering of Streptomyces species, which are prolific producers of complex secondary metabolites with significant pharmaceutical activities. The mobile group II introns are retrotransposons that employ activities of catalytic intron RNAs and intron-encoded reverse transcriptase to precisely insert into DNA target sites through a mechanism known as retrohoming. We here developed a group II intron-based gene editing tool to achieve precise chromosomal gene insertion in Streptomyces. Moreover, by repressing the potential competition of RecA-dependent homologous recombination, we enhanced site-specific insertion efficiency of this tool to 2.38%. Subsequently, we demonstrated the application of this tool by screening and characterizing the secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) responsible for synthesizing the red pigment in Streptomyces roseosporus. Accompanied with identifying and inactivating this BGC, we observed that the impair of this cluster promoted cell growth and daptomycin production. Additionally, we applied this tool to activate silent jadomycin BGC in Streptomyces venezuelae. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential of this method as an alternative tool for genetic engineering and cryptic natural product mining in Streptomyces species.

A new RNA-DNA interaction required for integration of group II intron retrotransposons into DNA targets.

Mobile group II introns are site-specific retrotransposable elements abundant in bacterial and organellar genomes. They are composed of a large and highly structured ribozyme and an intron-encoded reverse transcriptase that binds tightly to its intron to yield a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particle. During the first stage of the mobility pathway, the intron RNA catalyses its own insertion directly into the DNA target site. Recognition of the proper target rests primarily on multiple base-pairing interactions between the intron RNA and the target DNA, while the protein makes contacts with only a few target positions by yet-unidentified mechanisms. Using a combination of comparative sequence analyses and in vivo mobility assays we demonstrate the existence of a new base-pairing interaction named EBS2a–IBS2a between the intron RNA and its DNA target site. This pairing adopts a Watson–Crick geometry and is essential for intron mobility, most probably by driving unwinding of the DNA duplex. Importantly, formation of EBS2a–IBS2a also requires the reverse transcriptase enzyme which stabilizes the pairing in a non-sequence-specific manner. In addition to bringing to light a new structural device that allows subgroup IIB1 and IIB2 introns to invade their targets with high efficiency and specificity our work has important implications for the biotechnological applications of group II introns in bacterial gene targeting.

Template-switching mechanism of a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase and its implications for biological function and RNA-Seq

The reverse transcriptases (RTs) encoded by mobile group II introns and other non-LTR retroelements differ from retroviral RTs in being able to template-switch efficiently from the 5' end of one template to the 3' end of another with little or no complementarity between the donor and acceptor templates. Here, to establish a complete kinetic framework for the reaction and to identify conditions that more efficiently capture acceptor RNAs or DNAs, we used a thermostable group II intron RT (TGIRT; GsI-IIC RT) that can template switch directly from synthetic RNA template/DNA primer duplexes having either a blunt end or a 3'-DNA overhang end. We found that the rate and amplitude of template switching are optimal from starter duplexes with a single nucleotide 3'-DNA overhang complementary to the 3' nucleotide of the acceptor RNA, suggesting a role for nontemplated nucleotide addition of a complementary nucleotide to the 3' end of cDNAs synthesized from natural templates. Longer 3'-DNA overhangs progressively decreased the template-switching rate, even when complementary to the 3' end of the acceptor template. The reliance on only a single bp with the 3' nucleotide of the acceptor together with discrimination against mismatches and the high processivity of group II intron RTs enable synthesis of full-length DNA copies of nucleic acids beginning directly at their 3' end. We discuss the possible biological functions of the template-switching activity of group II intron- and other non-LTR retroelement-encoded RTs, as well as the optimization of this activity for adapter addition in RNA- and DNA-Seq protocols.

Retrohoming of a Mobile Group II Intron in Human Cells Suggests How Eukaryotes Limit Group II Intron Proliferation.

Mobile bacterial group II introns are evolutionary ancestors of spliceosomal introns and retroelements in eukaryotes. They consist of an autocatalytic intron RNA (a “ribozyme”) and an intron-encoded reverse transcriptase, which function together to promote intron integration into new DNA sites by a mechanism termed “retrohoming”. Although mobile group II introns splice and retrohome efficiently in bacteria, all examined thus far function inefficiently in eukaryotes, where their ribozyme activity is limited by low Mg2+ concentrations, and intron-containing transcripts are subject to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) and translational repression. Here, by using RNA polymerase II to express a humanized group II intron reverse transcriptase and T7 RNA polymerase to express intron transcripts resistant to NMD, we find that simply supplementing culture medium with Mg2+ induces the Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB intron to retrohome into plasmid and chromosomal sites, the latter at frequencies up to ~0.1%, in viable HEK-293 cells. Surprisingly, under these conditions, the Ll.LtrB intron reverse transcriptase is required for retrohoming but not for RNA splicing as in bacteria. By using a genetic assay for in vivo selections combined with deep sequencing, we identified intron RNA mutations that enhance retrohoming in human cells, but <4-fold and not without added Mg2+. Further, the selected mutations lie outside the ribozyme catalytic core, which appears not readily modified to function efficiently at low Mg2+ concentrations. Our results reveal differences between group II intron retrohoming in human cells and bacteria and suggest constraints on critical nucleotide residues of the ribozyme core that limit how much group II intron retrohoming in eukaryotes can be enhanced. These findings have implications for group II intron use for gene targeting in eukaryotes and suggest how differences in intracellular Mg2+ concentrations between bacteria and eukarya may have impacted the evolution of introns and gene expression mechanisms.

Biotechnological applications of mobile group II introns and their reverse transcriptases: gene targeting, RNA-seq, and non-coding RNA analysis

Mobile group II introns are bacterial retrotransposons that combine the activities of an autocatalytic intron RNA (a ribozyme) and an intron-encoded reverse transcriptase to insert site-specifically into DNA. They recognize DNA target sites largely by base pairing of sequences within the intron RNA and achieve high DNA target specificity by using the ribozyme active site to couple correct base pairing to RNA-catalyzed intron integration. Algorithms have been developed to program the DNA target site specificity of several mobile group II introns, allowing them to be made into ‘targetrons.’ Targetrons function for gene targeting in a wide variety of bacteria and typically integrate at efficiencies high enough to be screened easily by colony PCR, without the need for selectable markers. Targetrons have found wide application in microbiological research, enabling gene targeting and genetic engineering of bacteria that had been intractable to other methods. Recently, a thermostable targetron has been developed for use in bacterial thermophiles, and new methods have been developed for using targetrons to position recombinase recognition sites, enabling large-scale genome-editing operations, such as deletions, inversions, insertions, and ‘cut-and-pastes’ (that is, translocation of large DNA segments), in a wide range of bacteria at high efficiency. Using targetrons in eukaryotes presents challenges due to the difficulties of nuclear localization and sub-optimal magnesium concentrations, although supplementation with magnesium can increase integration efficiency, and directed evolution is being employed to overcome these barriers. Finally, spurred by new methods for expressing group II intron reverse transcriptases that yield large amounts of highly active protein, thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptases from bacterial thermophiles are being used as research tools for a variety of applications, including qRT-PCR and next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). The high processivity and fidelity of group II intron reverse transcriptases along with their novel template-switching activity, which can directly link RNA-seq adaptor sequences to cDNAs during reverse transcription, open new approaches for RNA-seq and the identification and profiling of non-coding RNAs, with potentially wide applications in research and biotechnology.

Enhanced group II intron retrohoming in magnesium-deficient Escherichia coli via selection of mutations in the ribozyme core

Mobile group II introns are bacterial retrotransposons thought to be evolutionary ancestors of spliceosomal introns and retroelements in eukaryotes. They consist of a catalytically active intron RNA ("ribozyme") and an intron-encoded reverse transcriptase, which function together to promote RNA splicing and intron mobility via reverse splicing of the intron RNA into new DNA sites ("retrohoming"). Although group II introns are active in bacteria, their natural hosts, they function inefficiently in eukaryotes, where lower free Mg(2+) concentrations decrease their ribozyme activity and constitute a natural barrier to group II intron proliferation within nuclear genomes. Here, we show that retrohoming of the Ll.LtrB group II intron is strongly inhibited in an Escherichia coli mutant lacking the Mg(2+) transporter MgtA, and we use this system to select mutations in catalytic core domain V (DV) that partially rescue retrohoming at low Mg(2+) concentrations. We thus identified mutations in the distal stem of DV that increase retrohoming efficiency in the MgtA mutant up to 22-fold. Biochemical assays of splicing and reverse splicing indicate that the mutations increase the fraction of intron RNA that folds into an active conformation at low Mg(2+) concentrations, and terbium-cleavage assays suggest that this increase is due to enhanced Mg(2+) binding to the distal stem of DV. Our findings indicate that DV is involved in a critical Mg(2+)-dependent RNA folding step in group II introns and demonstrate the feasibility of selecting intron variants that function more efficiently at low Mg(2+) concentrations, with implications for evolution and potential applications in gene targeting.

A Targetron System for Gene Targeting in Thermophiles and Its Application in Clostridium thermocellum

BackgroundTargetrons are gene targeting vectors derived from mobile group II introns. They consist of an autocatalytic intron RNA (a “ribozyme”) and an intron-encoded reverse transcriptase, which use their combined activities to achieve highly efficient site-specific DNA integration with readily programmable DNA target specificity.Methodology/Principal FindingsHere, we used a mobile group II intron from the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus to construct a thermotargetron for gene targeting in thermophiles. After determining its DNA targeting rules by intron mobility assays in Escherichia coli at elevated temperatures, we used this thermotargetron in Clostridium thermocellum, a thermophile employed in biofuels production, to disrupt six different chromosomal genes (cipA, hfat, hyd, ldh, pta, and pyrF). High integration efficiencies (67–100% without selection) were achieved, enabling detection of disruptants by colony PCR screening of a small number of transformants. Because the thermotargetron functions at high temperatures that promote DNA melting, it can recognize DNA target sequences almost entirely by base pairing of the intron RNA with less contribution from the intron-encoded protein than for mesophilic targetrons. This feature increases the number of potential targetron-insertion sites, while only moderately decreasing DNA target specificity. Phenotypic analysis showed that thermotargetron disruption of the genes encoding lactate dehydrogenase (ldh; Clo1313_1160) and phosphotransacetylase (pta; Clo1313_1185) increased ethanol production in C. thermocellum by decreasing carbon flux toward lactate and acetate.Conclusions/SignificanceThermotargetron provides a new, rapid method for gene targeting and genetic engineering of C. thermocellum, an industrially important microbe, and should be readily adaptable for gene targeting in other thermophiles.

Mobile Group II Introns: Site‐Specific DNA Integration and Applications in Gene Targeting

Mobile group II introns are bacterial retroelements that integrate site-specifically into new DNA target sites in a process called “retrohoming”. Retrohoming is mediated by an RNP that is formed during RNA splicing and consists of the catalytically active intron RNA (“ribozyme”) and an intron-encoded reverse transcriptase (RT). RNPs recognize DNA target sequences for retrohoming by using both the protein and base pairing of the intron RNA, with the latter contributing most of the DNA target specificity. Site-specific DNA integration then ensues by a remarkable mechanism in which the intron RNA uses its ribozyme activity to insert (“reverse splice”) directly into a DNA strand, where it is reverse transcribed back into DNA by the intron-encoded RT. Because the DNA target site is recognized largely by base pairing of the intron RNA with little contribution from the protein, the intron can be reprogrammed to insert into new DNA target sites simply by modifying the intron RNA. This feature combined with their high insertion frequencies and specificity enabled the development of mobile group II introns into gene targeting vectors (“targetrons”), with the unique feature of readily programmable DNA target specificity. Targetrons are now widely used for genetic engineering and functional genomics in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and are being adapted for use in higher organisms.

Genetic identification of potential RNA-binding regions in a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase

Mobile group II introns encode a reverse transcriptase that binds the intron RNA to promote RNA splicing and intron mobility, the latter via reverse splicing of the excised intron into DNA sites, followed by reverse transcription. Previous work showed that the Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB intron reverse transcriptase, denoted LtrA protein, binds with high affinity to DIVa, a stem-loop structure at the beginning of the LtrA open reading frame and makes additional contacts with intron core regions that stabilize the active RNA structure for forward and reverse splicing. LtrA's binding to DIVa down-regulates its translation and is critical for initiation of reverse transcription. Here, by using high-throughput unigenic evolution analysis with a genetic assay in which LtrA binding to DIVa down-regulates translation of GFP, we identified regions at LtrA's N terminus that are required for DIVa binding. Then, by similar analysis with a reciprocal genetic assay, we confirmed that residual splicing of a mutant intron lacking DIVa does not require these N-terminal regions, but does require other reverse transcriptase (RT) and X/thumb domain regions that bind the intron core. We also show that N-terminal fragments of LtrA by themselves bind specifically to DIVa in vivo and in vitro. Our results suggest a model in which the N terminus of nascent LtrA binds DIVa of the intron RNA that encoded it and nucleates further interactions with core regions that promote RNP assembly for RNA splicing and intron mobility. Features of this model may be relevant to evolutionarily related non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR)-retrotransposon RTs.

A Broadscale Phylogenetic Analysis of Group II Intron RNAs and Intron-Encoded Reverse Transcriptases

Group II introns are self-splicing RNAs that are frequently assumed to be the ancestors of spliceosomal introns. They are widely distributed in bacteria and are also found in organelles of plants, fungi, and protists. In this study, we present a broadscale phylogenetic analysis of group II introns using sequence data from both the conserved RNA structure and the intron-encoded reverse transcriptase (RT). Two similar phylogenies are estimated for the RT open reading frame (ORF), based on either amino acid or nucleotide sequence, whereas one phylogeny is produced for the RNA. In making these estimates, we confronted nearly all the classic challenges to phylogenetic inference, including positional saturation, base composition heterogeneity, short internodes with low support, and sensitivity to taxon sampling. Although the major lineages are well-defined, robust resolution of topology is not possible between these lineages. The approximately unbiased (AU) and Shimodaira-Hasegawa topology tests indicated that the RT ORF and RNA ribozyme data sets are in significant conflict under a variety of models, revealing the possibility of imperfect coevolution between group II introns and their intron-encoded ORFs. The high level of sequence divergence, large timescale, and limited number of alignable characters in our study are representative of many RTs and group I introns, and our results suggest that phylogenetic analyses of any of these sequences could suffer from the same sources of error and instability identified in this study.

A Three-Dimensional Model of a Group II Intron RNA and Its Interaction with the Intron-Encoded Reverse Transcriptase

Group II introns are self-splicing ribozymes believed to be the ancestors of spliceosomal introns. Many group II introns encode reverse transcriptases that promote both RNA splicing and intron mobility to new genomic sites. Here we used a circular permutation and crosslinking method to establish 16 intramolecular distance relationships within the mobile Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB-DeltaORF intron. Using these new constraints together with 13 established tertiary interactions and eight published crosslinks, we modeled a complete three-dimensional structure of the intron. We also used the circular permutation strategy to map RNA-protein interaction sites through fluorescence quenching and crosslinking assays. Our model provides a comprehensive structural framework for understanding the function of group II ribozymes, their natural structural variations, and the mechanisms by which the intron-encoded protein promotes RNA splicing and intron mobility. The model also suggests an arrangement of active site elements that may be conserved in the spliceosome.

A bacterial group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase localizes to cellular poles

The Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB group II intron encodes a reverse transcriptase (LtrA protein) that binds the intron RNA to promote RNA splicing and intron mobility. Here, we used LtrA-GFP fusions and immunofluorescence microscopy to show that LtrA localizes to cellular poles in Escherichia coli and Lactococcus lactis. This polar localization occurs with or without coexpression of Ll.LtrB intron RNA, is observed over a wide range of cellular growth rates and expression levels, and is independent of replication origin function. The same localization pattern was found for three nonoverlapping LtrA subsegments, possibly reflecting dependence on common redundant signals and/or protein physical properties. When coexpressed in E. coli, LtrA interferes with the polar localization of the Shigella IcsA protein, which mediates polarized actin tail assembly, suggesting competition for a common localization determinant. The polar localization of LtrA could account for the preferential insertion of the Ll.LtrB intron in the origin and terminus regions of the E. coli chromosome, may facilitate access to exposed DNA in these regions, and could potentially link group II intron mobility to the host DNA replication and/or cell division machinery.

Domain structure and three-dimensional model of a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase

Group II intron-encoded proteins (IEPs) have both reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, which functions in intron mobility, and maturase activity, which promotes RNA splicing by stabilizing the catalytically active RNA structure. The LtrA protein encoded by the Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB group II intron contains an N-terminal RT domain, with conserved sequence motifs RT1 to 7 found in the fingers and palm of retroviral RTs; domain X, associated with maturase activity; and C-terminal DNA-binding and DNA endonuclease domains. Here, partial proteolysis of LtrA with trypsin and Arg-C shows major cleavage sites in RT1, and between the RT and X domains. Group II intron and related non-LTR retroelement RTs contain an N-terminal extension and several insertions relative to retroviral RTs, some with conserved features implying functional importance. Sequence alignments, secondary-structure predictions, and hydrophobicity profiles suggest that domain X is related structurally to the thumb of retroviral RTs. Three-dimensional models of LtrA constructed by "threading" the aligned sequence on X-ray crystal structures of HIV-1 RT (1) account for the proteolytic cleavage sites; (2) suggest a template-primer binding track analogous to that of HIV-1 RT; and (3) show that conserved regions in splicing-competent LtrA variants include regions of the RT and X (thumb) domains in and around the template-primer binding track, distal regions of the fingers, and patches on the protein's back surface. These regions potentially comprise an extended RNA-binding surface that interacts with different regions of the intron for RNA splicing and reverse transcription.

Characterization of the C-Terminal DNA-binding/DNA Endonuclease Region of a Group II Intron-encoded Protein

Group II intron retrohoming occurs by a mechanism in which the intron RNA reverse splices directly into one strand of a double-stranded DNA target site, while the intron-encoded reverse transcriptase uses a C-terminal DNA endonuclease activity to cleave the opposite strand and then uses the cleaved 3′ end as a primer for reverse transcription of the inserted intron RNA. Here, we characterized the C-terminal DNA-binding/DNA endonuclease region of the LtrA protein encoded by the Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB intron. This C-terminal region consists of an upstream segment that contributes to DNA binding, followed by a DNA endonuclease domain that contains conserved sequence motifs characteristic of H–N–H DNA endonucleases, interspersed with two pairs of conserved cysteine residues. Atomic emission spectroscopy of wild-type and mutant LtrA proteins showed that the DNA endonuclease domain contains a single tightly bound Mg 2+ ion at the H–N–H active site. Although the conserved cysteine residue pairs could potentially bind Zn 2+, the purified LtrA protein is active despite the presence of only sub-stoichiometric amounts of Zn 2+, and the addition of exogenous Zn 2+ inhibits the DNA endonuclease activity. Multiple sequence alignments identified features of the DNA-binding region and DNA endonuclease domain that are conserved in LtrA and related group II intron proteins, and their functional importance was demonstrated by unigenic evolution analysis and biochemical assays of mutant LtrA protein with alterations in key amino acid residues. Notably, deletion of the DNA endonuclease domain or mutations in its conserved sequence motifs strongly inhibit reverse transcriptase activity, as well as bottom-strand cleavage, while retaining other activities of the LtrA protein. A UV-cross-linking assay showed that these DNA endonuclease domain mutations do not block DNA primer binding and thus likely inhibit reverse transcriptase activity either by affecting the positioning of the primer or the conformation of the reverse transcriptase domain.

Non-cognate template usage and alternative priming by a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase

Group II introns are retroelements that site-specifically insert into DNA through homing. They are also implicated in related phenomena such as ectopic site insertions and precise intron deletions, but little is known about how group II intron reverse transcriptases (RTs) interact with non-cognate substrates. Here we show that wild-type aI2 RT readily reverse transcribes non-cognate RNAs in mitochondrial RNP particles when the aI2 intron structure is misfolded. In two closely related priming mutants, 1°2 ΔD5 and 1 +2 ΔD5, which contain wild-type RT but a disrupted intron structure, the RT has substantially lost specificity for aI2 RNA and copies multiple RNAs present in the RNP particles, using an alternative priming mechanism. The RT in 1°2 ΔD5 RNP particles can also copy exogenous RNAs but unlike the endogenous templates, a complementary primer is required, suggesting that the alternative priming event is specific to RT-RNA interactions formed in vivo. Alternatively primed cDNAs from strains 1°2 ΔD5, 1 +2 ΔD5 and 1°2 P714T (containing the mutation P714T in the RT) do not use homing site DNA as a primer, but appear to utilize a non-complementary DNA primer of approximately ten nucleotides. The alternative priming mechanism and reverse transcription of non-cognate templates has implications for in vivo reverse transcription of non-intronic RNAs, which is expected to occur during intron deletions and other retroprocessing events.

Group II intron mobility in yeast mitochondria: target DNA-primed reverse transcription activity of ai1 and reverse splicing into DNA transposition sites in vitro

The retrohoming of the yeast mtDNA intron aI1 occurs by a target DNA-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) mechanism in which the intron RNA reverse splices directly into the recipient DNA and is then copied by the intron-encoded reverse transcriptase. Here, we carried out biochemical characterization of the intron-encoded reverse transcriptase and site-specific DNA endonuclease activities required for this process. We show that the aI1 reverse transcriptase has high TPRT activity in the presence of appropriate DNA target sites, but differs from the closely related reverse transcriptase encoded by the yeast aI2 intron in being unable to use artificial substrates efficiently. Characterization of TPRT products shows that the fully reverse spliced intron RNA is an efficient template for cDNA synthesis, while reverse transcription of partially reverse spliced intron RNA is impeded by the branch point. Novel features of the aI1 reaction include a prominent open-circular product in which cDNAs are incorporated at a nick at the antisense-strand cleavage site. The aI1 endonuclease activity, which catalyzes the DNA cleavage and reverse splicing reactions, is associated with ribonucleoprotein particles containing the intron-encoded protein and the excised intron RNA. As shown for the aI2 endonuclease, both the RNA and protein components are used for DNA target site recognition, but the aI1 protein has less stringent nucleotide sequence requirements for the reverse splicing reaction. Finally, perhaps reflecting this relaxed target specificity, in vitro experiments show that aI1 can reverse splice directly into ectopic mtDNA transposition sites, consistent with the previously suggested possibility that this mechanism is used for ectopic transposition of group II introns in vivo.

Group II intron endonucleases use both RNA and protein subunits for recognition of specific sequences in double-stranded DNA.

Group II introns use intron-encoded reverse transcriptase, maturase and DNA endonuclease activities for site-specific insertion into DNA. Remarkably, the endonucleases are ribonucleoprotein complexes in which the excised intron RNA cleaves the sense strand of the recipient DNA by reverse splicing, while the intron-encoded protein cleaves the antisense strand. Here, studies with the yeast group II intron aI2 indicate that both the RNA and protein components of the endonuclease contribute to recognition of an approximately 30 bp DNA target site. Our results lead to a model in which the protein component first recognizes specific nucleotides in the most distal 5' exon region of the DNA target site (E2-21 to -11). Binding of the protein then leads to DNA unwinding, enabling the intron RNA to base pair to a 13 nucleotide DNA sequence (E2-12 to E3+1) for reverse splicing. Antisense-strand cleavage requires additional interactions of the protein with the 3' exon DNA (E3+1 to +10). Our results show how enzymes can use RNA and protein subunits cooperatively to recognize specific sequences in double-stranded DNA.

Efficient integration of an intron RNA into double-stranded DNA by reverse splicing.

Some group II introns are mobile elements as well as catalytic RNAs. Introns aI1 and aI2 found in the gene COX1 in yeast mitochondria encode reverse transcriptases which promote site-specific insertion of the intron into intronless alleles ('homing'). For aI2 this predominantly occurs by reverse transcription of unspliced precursor RNA at a break in double-strand DNA made by an endonuclease encoded by the intron. The aI2 endonuclease involves both the excised intron RNA, which cleaves the DNA's sense strand by partial reverse splicing; and the intron-encoded reverse transcriptase which cleaves the anti-sense strand. Here we show that aI1 encodes an analogous endonuclease specific for a different target site compatible with the different exon-binding sequences of the intron RNA. Over half of aI1 undergoes complete reverse splicing in vitro, thus integrating linear intron RNA directly into the DNA. This unprecedented reaction has implications for both intron mobility and evolution, and potential genetic engineering applications.