No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Female Urology1 Jun 2001COMPLICATIONS AND INITIAL CONTINENCE RATES AFTER A REPEAT PUBOVAGINAL SLING PROCEDURE FOR RECURRENT STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE STEVEN P. PETROU and IGOR FRANK STEVEN P. PETROUSTEVEN P. PETROU Financial and/or other relationship with Bard, American Medical Systems, Upjohn Pharmacia and Timm Medical. More articles by this author and IGOR FRANKIGOR FRANK More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66257-XAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of repeat pubovaginal sling procedures for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 14 patients in whom an initial suburethral sling procedure failed, who then underwent a repeat pubovaginal sling procedure for recurrent stress urinary incontinence at our institution and who were available for followup evaluation. Mean followup after re-operation was 17 months (range 5 to 41). The response to surgery was assessed using the Blaivas-Groutz anti-incontinence surgery response score. Results: There were no intraoperative complications. Mean blood loss was 155 cc (range 50 to 750) and average operative time was 101 minutes (range 80 to 145). Long-term urinary retention developed in 1 of the 14 patients (7%). There were no deaths. Two patients (14%) had postoperative complications, including a pelvic abscess and osteomyelitis pubis in 1 each. Based on the Blaivas-Groutz anti-incontinence scale 7 of the 14 patients (50%) were cured, 1 (7%) had a good response, 4 (29%) had a fair response, 2 (14%) had a poor response and none had treatment failure. Subjectively 12 of the 14 women (86%) considered themselves cured or improved and 2 (14%) considered the operation to have failed. Conclusions: Our data imply that a repeat pubovaginal sling procedure after an initial failed operation is associated with low complication and acceptable continence rates. It should be considered a reasonable treatment option in select women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. References 1 : Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence. J Urol1978; 119: 82. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J Urol1998; 160: 1312. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Favorable outcome of pubovaginal slings for geriatric women with stress incontinence. J Urol1997; 157: 125. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Expanded indications for the pubovaginal sling: treatment of type 2 or 3 stress incontinence. J Urol1996; 156: 1620. Link, Google Scholar 5 : An assessment of the surgical outcome and urodynamic effects of the pubovaginal sling for stress incontinence and the associated urge syndrome. J Urol1999; 162: 135. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Our experience with pubovaginal slings in patients with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol1998; 159: 1195. Link, Google Scholar 7 : A simplified urinary incontinence score for the evaluation of treatment outcomes. Neurourol Urodyn2000; 19: 127. Google Scholar 8 : Results of pubovaginal sling for the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency determined by questionnaire analysis. J Urol1997; 158: 1738. Link, Google Scholar 9 : The effect of study methodology on reported success rates of the modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension. J Urol1995; 154: 1732. Link, Google Scholar 10 : A follow up of silastic sling for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1995; 102: 143. Google Scholar 11 : Vaginal wall sling for anatomical incontinence and intrinsic sphincter dysfunction: efficacy and outcome analysis. J Urol1996; 156: 166. Link, Google Scholar From the Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida© 2001 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byRutman M, Deng D, Shah S, Raz S and Rodríguez L (2018) Spiral Sling Salvage Anti-Incontinence Surgery in Female Patients With a Nonfunctional Urethra: Technique and Initial ResultsJournal of Urology, VOL. 175, NO. 5, (1794-1799), Online publication date: 1-May-2006.CHOE J (2018) Suprapubic Sling Adjustment: Minimally Invasive Method of Curing Recurrent Stress Incontinence After Sling SurgeryJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 5, (2059-2062), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2002. Volume 165Issue 6 Part 1June 2001Page: 1979-1981 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2001 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordsurinary incontinence, stressurethrareoperationMetricsAuthor Information STEVEN P. PETROU Financial and/or other relationship with Bard, American Medical Systems, Upjohn Pharmacia and Timm Medical. More articles by this author IGOR FRANK More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract